{"numero_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_sha256": "adf00bf147eba20edd702d93b5424acb4325215dab29c3664b24704d55de7f2f", "source_tei": "https://github.com/Princeton-CDH/bluemountain-transcriptions/blob/main/periodicals/bmtnaap/issues/1922/06_01/bmtnaap_1922-06_01.tei.xml", "source_mets": "https://github.com/pulibrary/BlueMountain/blob/main/metadata/periodicals/bmtnaap/issues/1922/06_01/bmtnaap_1922-06_01.mets.xml", "url_numero": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01", "articles": [{"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c002", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c002", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "[183]", "page_fin": "[183]", "image_debut": 2, "image_fin": 2, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.2", "titre_corps": "Table of Contents", "titre_sommaire": "Table of Contents", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 2, "page_imprimee": "[183]", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.2", "debut_caractere": 1247, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2072, "texte": "Cover Design — Ladiseaw Medges.\nThe Apoeeo of Veii.\nHymn from A Watermeeon Pavieion — Waeeace Stevens 185\nSix Characters in Search of an Author. Act. I, — Luigi Pirandeeeo 186\nA Last Word — Henry Beeeaman 205\nHedges — Henry Beeeaman 206\nJacques Lipchitz and My Portrait Bust — Jean Cocteau 207\nJean Cocteau — Lipchitz 208\nImprovisations — Conrad Aiken 210\nScuepture — Lipchitz 216\nMurder — Waedo Frank 220\nStars at Taeeapoosa — Waeeace Stevens 236\nConversations —S. Foster Damon . 236\nAee is one — Martin Armstrong 237\nThe Apoeeo of Veii — Edward Storer 238\nEtruscan Head • 241\nIf You Had Three Husbands — Gertrude Stein 242\nWaste — Loea Ridge 247\nPoems — Edward Storer 248\nThe Limbo of American Literature — Gorham B. Munson. 250\nDedicated to the Enemy — Gordon Craig 261\nMade in America — Mathew Josephson 266\nComment . 271"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c003", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c003", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "[184]", "page_fin": "[184]", "image_debut": 3, "image_fin": 3, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.3", "titre_corps": "The Apollo of Veii", "titre_sommaire": "The Apollo of Veii", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 3, "page_imprimee": "[184]", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.3", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 18, "texte": "THE APOLLO OF VEII"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c004", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c004", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "185", "page_fin": "185", "image_debut": 4, "image_fin": 4, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.4", "titre_corps": "Hymn from a Watermelon Pavilion", "titre_sommaire": "Hymn from a Watermelon Pavilion", "signature_source": "Wallace Stevens", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 4, "page_imprimee": "185", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.4", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 619, "texte": "HYMN FROM A WATERMELON PAVILION\nWallace Stevens\nYou dweller in the dark cabin,\nTo whom the watermelon is always purple,\nWhose garden is wind and moon,\nOf the two dreams, night and day,\nWhat lover, what dreamer, would choose\nThe one obscured by sleep ?\nHere is the plantain by your door\nAnd the best cock of red feather\nThat crew before the clocks.\nA feme may come, leaf-green,\nWhose coining may give revel\nBeyond revelries of sleep,\nYes, and the blackbird spread its tail,\nSo that the sun may speckle,\nWhile it creaks hail.\nYou dweller in the dark cabin,\nRise, since rising will not waken,\nAnd hail, cry hail, cry hail."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c005", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c005", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "186", "page_fin": "204", "image_debut": 5, "image_fin": 23, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.5", "titre_corps": "Six Characters in Search of an Author", "titre_sommaire": "Six Characters in Search of an Author", "signature_source": "Luigi Pirandello ; Edward Storer", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 5, "page_imprimee": "186", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.5", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1391, "texte": "SIX CHARACTERS IN SEARCH OF AN AUTHOR\n\nA Comedy in the Making\nACT I.\nCHARACTERS OF THE COMEDY IN THE MAKING:\nThe Father — The Mother — The Step-Daughter — The Son —\nThe Boy — The Chied — [The last two don't speak at all) Madame\nPace.\nACTORS OF THE COMPANY:\nThe Manager — Leading Lady — Leading Man — Second Lady\nLead — L'lng&nue — Juveniee Lead — Other Actors and Actresses —\nProperty Man — Prompter — Machinist — Manager's Secretary —\nDoor-keeper — Scene-shifters.\nDaytime. The Stage of a Theatre.\nN. B. The Comedy is without acts or scenes. The performance is interrupted once,\nwithout the curtain being lowered, when the manager and the chief character withdraw to ar-\nrange the scenario. A second interruption of the action takes place when, by mistake, the\nstage hand let the curtain down.\nNote\nThe spectators will find the curtain raised and the stage as it usually is during\nthe day time. It will be half dark and empty so that from, the beginning the public\nmay have the impression of an impromptu performance.\nPrompter's box and a small table and chair for the manager.\nTwo other small tables and several chairs scattered about as during re-\nhearsals.\nThe actors and actresses of the company enter from the back of the stage :\nfirst one, then another, then two together: nine or ten in all. They are about to\nrehearse a Pirandello play Mixing It Up. Some of the company move off to-"}, {"page_pdf": 6, "page_imprimee": "187", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.6", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2312, "texte": "wards their dressing rooms. The prompter who has the « book » under his arm, is\nwaiting for the Manager in order to begin the rehearsal.\nThe actors and actresses, some standing, some sitting, chat and smoke. One\nperhaps reads a paper ; another cons his part.\nFinally, the Manager enters and goes to the table prepared for him. His\nsecretary brings him his mail, at which he glances. The prompter takes his seat,\nturns on a light, and opens the \" book\nThe Manager {throwing a letter down on the table). I can't see {to\nProperty Man). Let's have a little light please.\nProperty Man. Yes, Sir, yes, at once {a light comes down on to the\nstage).\nThe Manager {clapping his hands). Come along ! Come along ! Second\nact of \" Mixing it Up \" {sits down).\n{The actors and actresses go from the front of the stage to the wings, all except\nthe three who are to begin the rehearsal).\nThe Prompter {reading the Book). Leo Gala's house. A curious room\nserving as dining-room and study.\nThe Manager {to Property Man). Fix up the old red room.\nProperty Man (•noting it down). Red set. All right.\nThe Prompter {continuing to read from Book). Table already laid and writ-\ning desk with books and papers. Book-shelves. Exit rear to Leo's Bedroom.\nExit left to kitchen. Principal exit to right.\nThe Manager {energetically). Well, you understand. There is the principal\nexit. Here the kitchen. {Turning to actor who is to play the part of Socrates)\nYou make your entrances and exits here. {To Property Man) The baize\ndoors at the rear and curtains.\nProperty Man {noting it down). Right oh!\nPrompter (;reading as before). When the curtain rises, Leo Gala, dress-\ned in cook's cap and apron is busy beating an egg in a cup. Philip, also\ndressed as a cook, is beating another egg. Guido Venanzi is seated and listens.\nLeading Man {to Manager). Excuse me, but must I absolutely wear a\ncook's cap ?\nThe Manager {annoyed). I imagine so. It says so there anyway {point-\ning to Book).\nLeading Man. But it's ridiculous !\nThe Manager {jumping up in a rage). Ridiculous ! ridiculous ! Is it my\nfault if France won't send us any more good comedies, and we are reduced\nputting on Pirandello's works, where nobody understands anything, and\nwhere the author plays the fool with us all ? {The actors grin. The Manager\ngoes to Leading Man and shouts)."}, {"page_pdf": 7, "page_imprimee": "188", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.7", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2592, "texte": "Yes sir, you put on the cook's cap and beat eggs. Do you suppose that\nwith all this egg-beating business you are on an ordinary stage ? Get that out\nof your head. You represent the shell of the eggs you are beating (Laughter\nand comments among the actors). Silence ! and listen to my explanations please.\n(to Leading Man). The empty form of reason without the fullness of instinct,\nwhich is blind. You stand for reason, your wife is instinct. It's a mixing up\nof the parts, according to which you who act your own part become the\npuppet of yourself. Do you understand ?\nIvEADiNG Man. I'm hanged if I do.\nThe Manager. Neither do I. But let's get on with it. It's sure to be a\nglorious failure anyway, (confidentially) But I say, please face three-quar-\nters Otherwise, what with the abstruseness of the dialogue, and the public\nthat won't be able to hear you, the whole thing will go to hell. Com.e on !\ncome on !\nPrompter. Pardon sir, may I get into my box ? There's a bit of a draught.\nThe Manager. Yes, yes.\nAt this point, the door-keeper has entered from the stage door and advances\ntowards the manager's table, taking off his braided cap. During this manoeuvre,\nthe Six Characters enter, and stop by the door at back of stage, so that when the door-\nkeeper is about to announce their coming to the Manager, they are already on the\nstage. A tenuous light surrounds them, almost as if irradiated by them — the faint\nbreath of their fantastic reality.\nThis light will disappear when they come forward towards the actors. They\npreserve, however, something of the dream lightness in which they seem almost\nsuspended, but this does not detract from the essential reality of their forms and\nexpressions.\nHe who is known as The Father is a man of about 50 : hair, thin at the temples,\nbut not bald, hair reddish in colour, and with thick moustaches, falling over his still\nfresh mouth, which often opens in an empty and uncertain smile. He is fattish,\npale; especially on his wide forehead. He has blue, oval-shaped eyes, very clear\nand piercing. Wears light trousers and a dark jacket. He is alternatively mell-\nifluous and violent in his manner.\nThe Mother seems crushed and terrified as if by an intolerable weight of\nshame and abasement. She is dressed in modest black and wears a thick widow s\nveil of crepe. When she lifts this, she reveals a wax-like face. She always keeps\n\\her eyes downcast.\nkj- The Step-Daughter, eighteen, is dashing, almost impudent, beautiful.\nKSfoe wears mourning too, but with great elegance. She shows contempt for the timid\nhalf-frightened manner of the wretched"}, {"page_pdf": 8, "page_imprimee": "189", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.8", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2108, "texte": "Boy (14 years old), also dressed in black. On the other hand, she displays\na lively tenderness for her little sister\nThe Chjxd (about four) dressed in white, with a black silk sash at the\nwaist.\nThe Son (22) tall, severe in his attitude of contempt for The Father, super-\ncilious and indifferent to the Mother. He looks as if he had come on the stage against\nhis will.\nDoor-keeper [cap in hand). Excuse me, sir.\nThe Manager [rudely). Eh ? What is it ?\nDoor-keeper [timidly). These people are asking for you, sir.\nThe Manager [furious). I am rehearsing, and you know perfectly well\nno one's allowed to come in during rehearsals [turning to the Characters). Who\nare you please ? What do you want ?\nThe Father [coming forward a little, followed by the others who seem embar-\nrassed) . As a matter of fact . . . we have come here in search of an author . . .\nThe Manager [half angry, half amazed). An author ? What author ?\nThe Father. Any author, sir.\nThe Manager. But there's no author here. We are not rehearsing a\nnew piece.\nThe Step-Daughter [vivaciously). So much the better, so much the better.\nWe can be your new piece.\nAn Actor [coming forward from the others). Oh, do you hear that ?\nThe Father [to Step-Daughter). Yes, but if the author isn't here [to\nManager). Unless you would be willing .. .\nThe Manager. You are trying to be funny.\nThe Father. No, for Heaven's sake, what are you saying ? We bring\nyou a drama, sir.\nThe Step-Daughter. We may be your fortune.\nThe Manager. Will you oblige me by going away. ? We haven't time to\nwaste with mad people.\nThe Father [mellifluously). Oh Sir, you know well that life is full of in-\nfinite absurdities, which, strangely enough, do not even need to appear plausible\nsince they are true.\nThe Manager. What the devil is he talking about ? \"\nThe Father. I say that to reverse the ordinary process may well be\nconsidered a madness : that is to create credible situations, in order that they\nmay appear true. But permit me to observe that if this be madness, it is the\nthe sole raison d'etre of your profession gentlemen (The actors look hurt and per-\nplexed) ."}, {"page_pdf": 9, "page_imprimee": "190", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.9", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2372, "texte": "The Manager [getting up and looking at him). So our profession seems to\nyou one worthy of madmen then ?\nThe Father. Well, to make seem true that which isn't true without\nany need, for a joke as it were .. . Isn't that your mission gentlemen : to\ngive life to fantastic characters on the stage ?\nThe Manager [interpreting the rising anger of the Company). But I would beg\nyou to believe, my dear Sir, that the profession of the comedian is a noble one.\nIf to-day, as things go, the playwrights give us stupid comedies to play and\npuppets to represent instead of men, remember we are proud to have given\nlife to immortal works here on these very boards (The actors, satisfied,\napplaud their Manager).\nThe Father [interrupting furiously). Exactly, perfectly, to living beings\nmore alive than those who breathe and wear clothes. Beings less real perhaps, but\ntruer. I agree with you entirely. [The actors look at one another in amaze-\nment) .\nThe Manager. But what do you mean ? Before you said .. .\nThe Father. No, excuse me, I meant it for you Sir, who were cry-\ning out that you had no time to lose with madmen, while no one better than\nyourself knows that nature uses the instrument of human fantasy in order to\npursue her high creative purpose.\nThe Manager. Very well. But where does all this take us ?\nThe Father. Nowhere. It is merely to show you that one is born\nto life in many forms, in many shapes, as tree, or as stone, as water,\nas butterfly, or as woman. So one may also be born a character in\na play.\nThe Manager [with feigned comic dismay). So you and these other friends\nof yours have been born characters ?\nThe Father. Exactly, and alive as you see [Manager and actors\nburst out laughing).\nThe Father [hurt). lam sorry you laugh, because we carry in us a drama,\nas you can guess from this woman here veiled in black.\nThe Manager [losing patience at last and almost indignant). Oh, chuck it!\nGet away please! Clear out of here! [to Property Man). For Heaven's\nsake turn them out!\nThe Father [resisting). No, no, look here, we .. .\nThe Manager [roaring). We come here to work you know.\nLeading Actor. One cannot let oneself be made such a fool of.\nThe Father [determined, coming forward). I at your incredu-\nlity, gentlemen. Are you not accustomed to see the characters created by an\nauthor spring to life in yourselves and face each other ? Just because there"}, {"page_pdf": 10, "page_imprimee": "191", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.10", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2210, "texte": "is no Book (pointing to the Prompter's box) which contains us, you refuse to be-\nlieve , . .\nThe Step-Daughter (advances towards Manager, smiling and coquettish).\nBelieve me, we are really six most interesting characters sir ; side-tracked\nhowever.\nThe Father. Yes, that is the word (to Manager all at once). In the sense,\nthat is, that the author who created us alive no longer wished or was no longer\nable materially to put us into a work of art. And this was a real crime sir,\nbecause he who has had the luck to be born a character can laugh even at\ndeath. He cannot die. The man, the writer, the instrument of the creation\nwill die, but his creation does not die. And to live for ever it does not need to\nhave extraordinary gifts or to be able to work wonders. Who was Sancho Panza ?\nWho was Don Abbondio ? Yet they live eternally because — live germs as\nthey .were — they had the fortune to find a fecundating matrix, a fantasy which\ncould raise and nourish them : make them live for ever. !\nThe Manager. That is quite all right. But what do you want here, all\nof you ?\nThe Father. We want to live.\nThe Manager (ironically). For Eternity?\nThe Father. No, sir, only for a moment in you.\nAn Actor. Just listen to him.\nLeading Lady. They want to live in us.\nJuvenile Lead (pointing to the Step-Daughter). I've no objection as\nfar as that one is concerned.\nThe Father. Look here ! look here ! The comedy has to be made.\n(to the Manager) But if you and your actors are willing, we can soon concert\nit among ourselves.\nThe Manager (annoyed). But what do you want to concert ? We\ndon't go in for concerts here. Here we play dramas and comedies !\nThe Father. Exactly. That is just why we have come to you.\nThe Manager. And where is the book ?\nThe Father. It is in us (The actors laugh). The drama is in us, and we\nare the drama. We are impatient to play it. Our inner passion drives us\non to this.\nThe Step-Daughter (disdainful, alluring, treacherous, full of impudence).\nMy passion, Sir, ah, if you only knew ! My passion for him ! (points to the\nFather and makes a pretence of embracing him. Then she breaks out into a loud\nlaugh).\nThe Father (angrily). Behave yourself ! And please don't laugh in that\nfashion."}, {"page_pdf": 11, "page_imprimee": "192", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.11", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2475, "texte": "The Step-Daughter. With your permission, gentlemen, I who am a\ntwo months orphan, will show you how I can dance and sing.\n(Sings and then dances Prenez garde a Tchou-Thin-Tehou).\nLes chinois sont un peuple malin,\nDe Shangai a Pekin,\nlis ont mis des ecriteux partout :\nPrenez garde a Tchou-Thin-Tchou.\nActors and Actresses. Bravo ! Well done ! Tip-top !\nThe Manager. Silence ! This isn't a cafe concert you know (iturning\nto the Father in consternation). Is she mad ?\nThe Father. Mad ? No, she's worse-than mad.\nThe Step-Daughter (to Manager). Worse! worse! Listen! Stage this\ndrama for us at once ! Then you will see that at a certain moment I-when\nthis little darling here (takes the Child by the hand and leads xher to the Manager).\nIsn't she a dear? (Takes her up and kisses her). Darling! Darling! (puts\nher down again and adds feelingly). Well, when God suddenly takes this dear\nlittle child away from that poor mother there, and this imbecile here (seizing\nhold of the Boy roughly and pushing him forward) does the stupidest things,\nlike the fool he is, you will see me run away. Yes, gentlemen, I shall be\noff. But the moment hasn't arrived yet. After what has taken place between\nhim and me, (indicates the Father with a horrible wink), I can't remain any\nlonger in this society to have to witness the anguish of this mother here\nfor that fool. . . (indicates the Son). Look at him ! at him ! See how\nindifferent, how frigid he is because he is the legitimate son. He despises me,\ndespises him (pointing to the Boy) despises this here because ... we are\nbastards (goes to the Mother and embraces her). And he doesn't want to recog-\nnize her as his mother, she who is the common mother of us all. He looks\ndown upon her as if she were only the mother of us three bastards. Wretch !\n(She says all this this very rapidly, excitedly. At the word \" bastards ~ she raises\nher voice, and almost spits out the final \" wretch /). ~\nThe Mother (to the Manager, in anguish). In the name of these two lit-\ntle children, I beg you . . . (She grows faint and is about to fall). Oh God !\nThe Father (coming forward to support her as do some of the actors) ! Quick „\na chair, a chair for this poor widow !\nThe Actors. Is it true ? Has she really fainted ?\nThe Manager. Quick, a chair here !\n(One of the actors brings a chair, the others proffer assistance. The Mother\ntries to prevent the Father from lifting the veil which covers her face).\nThe Father. Iyook at her ! Iyook at her !"}, {"page_pdf": 12, "page_imprimee": "193", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.12", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2358, "texte": "The Mother. No, no ; stop it please !\nThe Father (raising her veil). Let them see you !\nThe Mother (rising and covering her face with her hands, in desperation).\nI beg you Sir, to prevent this man from carrying out his plan which is loath-\nsome to me.\nThe Manager (dumbfounded). I don't understand at all. What is the\nsituation ? Is this lady your wife ? (to the Father).\nThe Father. Yes, gentlemen : my wife.\nThe Manager. But how can she be a widow if you are alive ? (The\nactors find relief for their astonishment in a loud laugh).\nThe Father. Don't laugh ! Don't laugh like that for Heaven's sake. Her\ndrama lies just here in this. She has had a lover,, a man who ought to\nbe here.\nThe Mother (with a cry). No ! No !\nThe Step-Daughter. Fortunately for her, he is dead. Two months\nago as I said. We are in mourning as you see.\nThe Father. He isn't here you see, not because he is dead. He isn't\nhere — look at her a moment and you will understand — because her drama\nisn't a drama of the love of two men for whom she was incapable of feeling\nanything excejjt possibly a little gratitude — not for me ; for the other. She\nisn't a woman, she is a mother, and her drama — powerful sir, I assure you —\nlies, as a matter of fact, all in these four children she has had by two men.\nThe Mother. I had them ? Have you got the courage to say that I\nwanted them ? It was his doing. It was he who gave me that other man,\nwho forced me to go away with him.\nThe Step-Daughter. It isn't true.\nThe Mother (startled). Not true, isn't it ?\nThe Step-Daughter. No, it isn't true, it just isn't true.\nThe Mother. And what can you know about it ?\nThe Step-Daughter. It isn't true. Don't believe it.(To Manager)\nDo you know why she says so ? For that fellow there (indicates the Son). She\ntortures herself, destroys herself on account of the neglect of that son there,\nand she wants him to believe that if she abandoned him when he was only\ntwo years old, it was because he (indicates the Father) made her do so.\nThe Mother (vigorously). He forced me to it, and I call God to witness\nit (to the Manager). Ask him (indicates husband) if it isn't true. Let him\nspeak ! You (to daughter) are not in a position to know anything about it.\nThe Step-Daughter. I know you lived in peace and happiness with\nmy father while he lived. Can you deny it ?\nThe Mother. No, I don't deny it .. ."}, {"page_pdf": 13, "page_imprimee": "194", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.13", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2216, "texte": "The Step-Daughter. He was always full of affection and kindness for\nyou (to the Boy, angrily). Its true, isn tit ? Tell them ! Why don t\nyou speak, you little fool ?\nThe Mother. Leave the poor boy alone ! Why do you want to make\nme appear ungrateful, daughter ? I don't want to offend .your father. I have\nanswered him that I didn't abandon my house and my son through any fault\nof mine, nor from any wilful passion.\nThe Father. It is true. It was my doing.\nLeading Man (to the Company). What a spectacle !\nLeading Lady. We are the audience this time.\nJuvenile Lead. For once in a way.\nThe Manager (beginning to get really interested). Let s hear them out.\nListen !\nThe Son. Oh yes, you're going to hear a fine bit now. He will talk\nto you of the Demon of Experiment.\nThe Father. You are a cynical imbecile. I've told you so already a\nhundred times (to the Manager). He tries to make fun of me on account of\nthis expression which I have found to excuse myself with.\nThe Son (with disgust). Yes, phrases! phrases!\nThe Father. Phrases. Isn't everyone consoled when faced with a\ntrouble or fact he doesn't understand, by a word, some simple word which tells\nus nothing and yet calms us ?\nThe Step-Daughter. Even in the case of remorse. In fact especially\nthen.\nThe Father. Remorse. No, that isn't true. I've done more than use\nwords to quieten the remorse in me.\nThe Step-Daughter. Yes, there was a bit of money too. Yes, yes, a bit\nof money. There were the hundred lire he was about to offer me in payment,\ngentlemen . . . (sensation of horror among the actors).\nThe Son (to the Step-Daughter). This is vile.\nThe Step-Daughter. Vile ? There they were in a pale blue envelope on\na little mahogany table in the back of Madame Pace's shop. You know Madame\nPace — one of those ladies who attract poor girls of good family i their ate-\nliers, under the pretext of their selling robes et manteaux.\nThe Son. And he thinks he has bought the right to tyrannise over us all\nwith those hundred lire he was going to pay ; but which, fortunately — n°te \"this\ngentlemen — he had no chance of paying.\nThe Step-Daughter. It was a near thing, though, you know ! (laughs\nironically).\nThe Mother (protesting). Shame, my daughter, shame !"}, {"page_pdf": 14, "page_imprimee": "195", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.14", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2638, "texte": "The Step-Daughter. Shame indeed ! This is my revenge ! lam dying\nto live that scene ... The room ... I see it .. . Here is the window with\nthe mantles exposed, there the divan, the looking-glass, a screen, there in front\nof the window the little mahogany table with the blue envelope containing one\nhundred lire. I see it. I see it. I could take hold of it. . . But you, gentle-\nmen, you ought to turn your backs now : lam almost nude, you know. But\nI don't blush : I leave that to him (indicating Father).\nThe Manager. I don't understand this at all.\nThe Father. Naturally enough. I would ask you, Sir, to exercise your\nauthority a little here, and let me speak before you believe all she is trying\nto blame me with. lyet me explain.\nThe Step-Daughter. Ah yes, explain it in your own way.\nThe Father. But don't you see that the whole trouble lies here. In\nwords, words. Each one of us has within him a whole world of things, each man\nof us his own special world. And how can we ever come to an understanding if\nI putin the words I utter the sense and value of things as I see them, while\nyou who listen to me must inevitably translate them according to the concep-\ntion of things each one of you has within himself ? We think we understand\neach other, but we never really do. Iyook here ! This woman {indicating\nthe Mother) takes all my pity for her as a specially ferocious form of cruelty.\nThe Mother. But you drove me away.\nThe Father. Do you hear her ? I drove her away. She believes I\nreally sent her away.\nThe Mother. You know how to talk, and I dont, but believe me Sir\n(to Manager) after he had married me .. . who knows why ?. . . I was a poor\ninsignificant woman . . .\nThe Father. But, good Heavens ! it was just for your humility that\nI married you. I loved this simplicity in you (He stops when he sees she makes\nsigns to contradict him, opens his arms wide in sign of desperation, seeing how\nhopeless it is to make himself understood). You see she denies it. Her mental\ndeafness, believe me is phenomenal, the limit (touches his forehead) deaf, deaf,\nmentally deaf. She has plenty of feeling. Oh yes, a good heart for the children\nbut the brain, deaf, to the point of desperation.\nThe Step-Daughter. Yes, but ask him how his intelligence has helped us.\nThe Father. If we could see all the evil that may spring from good,\nwhat should we do ? (At this point the Leading Lady who is biting her lips\nwith rage at seeing the Leading Man flirting with the Step-Daughter, comes forward\nand says to the Manager).\nIvEAding IyADY. Excuse me, but are we going to rehearse today ?\nManager. Of course, of course; but let's hear them out."}, {"page_pdf": 15, "page_imprimee": "196", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.15", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2293, "texte": "Juvenile IyEAD. This is something quite new.\nVlng&nue. Most interesting.\nLeading Yes, for the people who like that kind of thing (casts\na glance at Leading Man).\nThe Manager (to Father). You must please explain yourself quite clearly\n(sits down).\nThe Father. Very well then : listen. I had in my service a poor man, a\nclerk, a secretary of mine, full of devotion, who became friends with her (in-\ndicating the Mother). They understood one another, were kindred souls in fact,\nwithout, however, the least suspicion of any evil existing. They were incapable\neven of thinking of it.\nThe Step-Daughter. So he thought of it for them.\nThe Father. That's not true. I meant to do good to them and to myself,\nI confess, at the same time. Things had come to the point that I could not\nsay a word to either of them without their making a mute appeal, one to the\nother, with their eyes. I could see them silently asking each other how I was\nto be kept in countenance, how I was to be kept quiet. And this, believe\nme, was just about enough of itself to keep me in a constant rage, to exasperate\nme beyond measure.\nThe Manager. And why didn't you send him away then — this secretary\nof yours ?\nThe Father. Precisely what I did, Sir. And then I had to watch this\npoor woman drifting forlornly about the house like an animal without a master,\nlike an animal one has taken in out of pity.\nThe Mother. Ah yes .. . !\nThe Father (suddenly turning to the Mother). It's true about the son\nanyway, isn't it ?\nThe Mother. He took my son away from me first of all.\nThe Father. But not from cruelty. I did it so that he should grow up\nhealthy and strong by living in the country.\nThe Step-Daughter (pointing to him ironically). As one can see.\nThe Father (quickly). Is it my fault if he has grown up like this? I\nsent him to a wet nurse in the country, a peasant, as she did not seem to me\nstrong enough, though she is of humble origin. That was, anyway, the rea-\nson I married her. Unpleasant all this maybe, but how can it be helped?\nMy mistake possibly, but there we are ! All my life I have had these\nconfounded aspirations towards a certain moral sanity. (At this point the\nStep-Daughter bursts out into a noisy laugh). Oh, stop, it! Stop it! I can't\nstand it.\nThe Manager. Yes, please stop it, for Heaven's sake."}, {"page_pdf": 16, "page_imprimee": "197", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.16", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2675, "texte": "The Step-Daughter. But imagine moral sanity from him if you please,\nthe client of certain ateliers like that of Madame Pace.\nThe Father. Fool ! That is the proof that lam a man ! This seem-\ning contradiction, gentlemen, is the strongest proof that I stand here a live\nman before you. Why, it is just for this very incongruity in my nature that\nI have had to suffer what I have. I could not live by the side of that woman\n(',indicating the Mother) any longer, but not so much for the boredom she inspired\nme with as for the pity I felt for her.\nThe Mother. And so he turned me out.\nThe Father. Well provided for. Yes, I sent her to that man, gentle-\nmen ... to let her go free of me.\nThe Mother. And to free himself.\nThe Father. Yes, I admit it. It was also a liberation for me. But\ngreat evil has come of it. I meant well when I did it, and I did it more for her\nsake than mine. I swear it (crosses his arms on his chest ; then turns suddenly\nto the Mother). Did I ever lose sight of you until that other man carried you\noff to another town like the angry fool he was ? And on account of my pure\ninterest in you . . . my pure interest, I repeat, that had 110 base motive in it.\nI watched with the tenderest concern the new family that grew up around\nher. She can bear witness to this (;points to the Step-Daughter).\nThe Step-Daughter. Oh yes, that's true enough. When I was a kiddie,\nso so high, you know, with plaits over my shoulders and knickers longer than\nmy skirts, I used to see him waiting outside the school for me to come out.\nHe came to see how I was growing up.\nThe Father. This is infamous, shameful.\nThe Step-Daughter. No. Why ?\nThe Father. Infamous ! infamous ! (then excitedly to Manager explain-\ning). After she (indicating Mother) went away, my house seemed suddenfy\nempty. She was my incubus, but she filled my house. I was like a dazed\nfly alone in the empty rooms. This boy heie (indicating the Son) was educated\naway from home, and when he came back, he seemed to me to be no more\nmine. With no mother to stand between him and me, he grew up entirely for\nhimself, on his own, apart, with no tie of intellect or affection binding him\nto me. And then — strange but true — I was driven by curiosity at first and\nthen by some tender sentiment towards her family which had come into being\nthrough my will. The thought of her began gradually to fill up the emptiness\nI felt all around me. I wanted to know if she were happy in living out the\nsimple daily duties of life. I wanted to think of her as fortunate and happy\nbecause far away from the complicated torments of my spirit. And so, to\nhave proof of this, I used to watch that child coming out of school."}, {"page_pdf": 17, "page_imprimee": "198", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.17", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2662, "texte": "The Step-Daughter. Yes, yes. True. He used to follow me in the street\nand smiled at me, waved his hand like this. I would look at him with interest,\nwondering who he might be. I told my mother, who guessed at once (The\nMother agrees with a nod). Then she didn't want to send me to school for some\ndays, and when I finally went back, there he was again — looking so ridiculous\n— with a paper parcel in his hands. He came close to me, caressed me, and drew\nout a fine straw hat from the parcel with a bouquet of flowers — all for me.\nThe Manager. A bit discursive this you know.\nThe Son (<contemptuously). Literature ! Literature !\nThe Father. Literature indeed ! This is life, this is passion.\nThe Manager. It may be, but it won't act.\nThe Father. I agree. This is only the part leading up. I don't sug-\ngest this should be staged. She (pointing to the Step-Daughter) as you see, is\nno longer the flapper with plaits down her back.\nThe Step-Daughter. And the knickers showing below the shirt.\nThe Father. The drama is coming now Sir. Something new, complex,\nmost interesting.\nThe Step-Daughter. As soon as my father died .. .\nThe Father. There was absolute misery for them. They came back here,\nunknown to me. Through her stupidity (;pointing to the Mother). It is true\nshe can barely write her own name, but she could anyhow have got her daughter\nto write to me that they were in need. . . .\nThe Mother. And how was Ito divine all this sentiment in him ?\nThe Father. That, is exactly your mistake, never to have guessed\nany of my sentiments.\nThe Mother. After so many years apart, and all that had happened .. .\nThe Father. Was it my fault if that fellow carried you away ?It hap-\npened quite suddenly, for after he had obtained some job or other, I could\nfind no trace of them, and so not unnaturally, my interest in them dwindled. But\nthe drama culminated unforseen and violent on their return when I was im-\npelled by my miserable flesh that still lives ... Ah ! what misery, what\nwretchedness is that of the man who is alone and disdains debasing liaisons.\nNot old enough to do without women, and not young enough to go and look\nfor one without shame. Misery ! it's worse than misery. It's a horror, for no\nwoman can any longer give him love, and when a man feels this . . . One ought\nto do without you say. Yes, yes, I know. Each of us when he appears\nbefore his fellows is clothed in a certain dignity. But every man knows what\nunconfessable things pass within the secrecy of his own heart. One gives\nway to the temptation, only to rise from it again afterwards with a great\neagerness to reestablish one's dignity, as if it were a tombstone to place on the"}, {"page_pdf": 18, "page_imprimee": "199", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.18", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2813, "texte": "grave of one's shame, and a monument to hide and sign the memory of our\nweaknesses. Everybody's in the same case. Some folk haven't the courage to\nsay certain things, that's all.\nThe Step-Daughter. All appear to have the courage to do them though.\nThe Father. Yes, but in secret. Therefore, you want more courage to say these\nthings. Let a man but speak these things out, and folk at once label him a cynic.\nBut it isn't true. He is like all the others, better indeed, because he isn't afraid to\nreveal with the light of the intelligence the red shame of human bestiality on\nwhich most men close their eyes so as not to see it.\nWoman — for example — look at her case. She turns tantalizing inviting\nglances on you. You seize her. No sooner does she feel herself in your grasp\nthan she closes her eyes. It is the sign of her mission, the sign by which she\nsays toman : \" Blind yourself for I am blind. \"\nThe Step-Daughter. Sometimes she can close them no more : when\nshe no longer feels the need of hiding her shame to herself, but dry-eyed and\ndispassionately, sees only that of the man who has blinded himself without\nlove. Oh, all these intellectual complications make me sick, disgust me, all\nthis philosophy that uncovers the beast in man, and then seeks to save him,\nexcuse him ... I can't stand it Sir. When a man seeks to \" simplify\"\nlife bestially, throwing aside every relic of humanity, every chaste aspiration,\npure feeling, all sense of ideality, duty, modesty, shame .. . then nothing is\nmore revolting and nauseous than a certain kind of remorse — crocodiles'\ntears, that's what it is.\nThe Manager. Let's come to the point. This is only discussion.\nThe Father. Very good, Sir. But a fact is like a sack which won't\nstand up when it is empty. In order that it may stand up, one has to put into\nit the reason and sentiment which have caused it to exist. I couldn't possibly\nknow that after the death of that man, they had decided to return here, that\nthey were in misery, and that she (;pointing to the Mother) had gone to work\nas a modiste, and at a shop of the type of that of Madame Pace.\nThe Step-Daughter. A real high class modiste you must know gentlemen.\nIn appearance, she works for the leaders of the best society, but she arranges\nmatters so that these elegant ladies serve her purpose. . . . without prejudice\nto other ladies who are well. . . only so so.\nThe Mother. You will believe me, gentlemen, that it never entered my\nmind that the old hag offered me work because she had her eye on my daughter.\nThe Step-Daughter. Poor mamma! Do you know, Sir, what that\nwoman did when I brought her back the work my mother had finished ? She would\npoint out to me that I had torn one of my frocks, and she would give it back\nto my mother to mend. It was I who paid for it, always I, while this poor"}, {"page_pdf": 19, "page_imprimee": "200", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.19", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2517, "texte": "creature here believed she was sacrificing herself for me and these two children\nhere, sitting up at night sewing Madame Pace's robes.\nThe Manager. And one day you met there .. .\nThe Step-Daughter. Him, him. Yes Sir, an old client. There's a\nscene for you to play. Superb !\nThe Father. She, the Mother arrived just then .. .\nThe Step-Daughter (treacherously). Almost in time.\nThe Father (crying out). No, in time !in time ! Fortunately I recognized\nher in time. And I took them back home with me to my house. You can\nimagine now her position and mine. She, as you see her, and I who cannot\nlook iher in the face.\nThe Step-Daughter. Absurd ! How can I possibly be expected to be\na modest young miss \" after ...\" a fit person to go with his confounded aspira-\ntions for \"a solid moral sanity \" ?\nThe Father. For the drama lies all in this — in the conscience that I\nhave, that each one of us has. We believe this conscience to be a single thing,\nbut it is many-sided. There is one for this person, and another for that. Di-\nverse consciences. So we have this illusion of being one person for all, of having\na personality that is unique in all our acts. But it isn't true. We perceive\nthis when, tragically perhaps, in something we do, we are as it were, suspended,\ncaught up in the air on a kind of hook. Then we perceive that all of us was not\nin that act, and that it would be an atrocious injustice to judge us by that\naction alone, as if all our existence were summed up in that one deed. Now\ndo you understand the perfidy of this girl ? She surprised me in a place,\nwhere she ought not to have known me, just as I could not exist for her,\nand she now seeks to attach to me a reality such as I could never suppose I\nshould have to assume for her in a shameful and fleeting moment of my life.\nI feel this above all else. And the drama, you will see, acquires a tremendous\nvalue from this point. Then there is the position of the others . . . his .. .\n(indicating the Son).\nThe Son (shrugging his shoulders scornfully). me alone ! I don't\ncome into this.\nThe Father. What ? You don't come into this ?\nThe Son. I've got nothing to do with it, and don't want to have, because\nyou know well enough I wasn't made to be mixed up in all this with the rest\nof you.\nThe Step-Daughter. We are only vulgar folk ! He is the fine gentleman.\nYou may have noticed, Mr. Manager, that I fix him now and again with a look\nof scorn while he lowers his eyes — for he knows the evil he has done me.\nThe Son (scarcely looking at her). I ?"}, {"page_pdf": 20, "page_imprimee": "201", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.20", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2652, "texte": "2\n\nThe Step-Daughter. You ! you! I owe my life on the streets to yoti.\nDid you or did you not deny us with your behaviour, I won't say the intimacy\nof home, but even that mere hospitality which makes guests feel at their\nease. We were intruders who had come to disturb the kingdom of your legit-\nimacy. I should like to have you witness, Mr. Manager , certain scenes between\nhim and me. He says I have tyrannized over everyone. But it was just his\nbehaviour which made me insist on the reason for which I had come into the\nhouse, — this reason he calls \" vile \" — into his house with my mother who is his\nmother too. And I came as mistress of the house.\nThe Son. It's easy for them to put me always in the wrong. But imagine,\ngentlemen, the position of a son, whose fate it is to see arrive one day at his\nhome a young woman of impudent bearing, a young woman who inquires\nfor his father, with whom who knows what business she has. This young man\nhas then to witness her return bolder than ever, accompanied by that child\nthere. He is obliged to watch her treat his father in an equivocal and confi-\ndential manner. She asks money of him in a way that lets one suppose he\nmust give it her, must, do you understand, because he has every obligation\nto do so.\nThe Father. But I have, as a matter of fact, this obligation. I owe\nit to your mother.\nThe Son. How should I know ? When had I ever seen or heard of her ?\nOne day there arrive with her (lindicating Step-Daughter) that lad and this baby\nhere. lam told : \"This is your mother too, you know. \" I divine from\nher manner [indicating Step-Daughter again) why it is they have come home.\nI had rather not say what I feel and think about it. I shouldn't even care to\nconfess to myself. No action can therefore be hoped for from me in this affair.\nBelieve me, Mr. Manager, I am an \" unrealized \" character, dramatically speak-\ning, and I find myself not at all at ease in their company. lyeave me out of\nit, I beg you.\nThe Father. What ? It is just because you are so that. . .\nThe Son. How do you know what I am like ? When did you ever\nbother your head about me ?\nThe Father. I admit it. I admit it. But isn't that a situation in itself ?\nThis aloofness of yours which is so cruel to me and your mother who returns\nhome and sees you almost for the first time grown up, who doesn't recognize\nyou but knows you are her son . . . (pointing out the Mother to the Manager).\nSee, she's crying !\nThe Step-Daughter (angrily, stamping her foot). Iyike a fool!\nThe Father (indicating Step-Daughter). She can't stand him you know\n(then referring again to the Son). She says he doesn't come into the affair, whereas"}, {"page_pdf": 21, "page_imprimee": "202", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.21", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2549, "texte": "he is really the hinge of the whole action. Look at that lad who is always\nclinging to his mother, frightened and humiliated. It is on account of this\nfellow here. Possibly his situation is the most painful of all. He feels himself\na stranger more than the others. The poor little chap feels mortified,\nhumiliated at being brought into a home out of charity as it were {in confidence).\nHe is the image of his father. Hardly talks at all. Humble and quiet.\nThb Managkr. Oh, we'll cut him out. You've no notion what a nui-\nsance boys are on the stage. . . .\nThe Father. He disappears soon, you know. And the baby too. She\nis the first to vanish from the scene. The drama consists finally in this : when\nthat mother re-enters my house, her family born outside of it, and\nshall we say superimposed on the original, ends with the death of the little\ngirl, the tragedy of the boy and the flight of the elder daughter. It cannot\ngo on, because it is foreign to its surroundings. So after much torment, we\nthree remain : I, the mother, that son. Then, owing to the disappearance\nof that extraneous family, we too find ourselves strange to one another. We\nfind we are living in an atmosphere of mortal desolation which is the revenge,\nas he (indicating Son) scornfully said of the Demon of Experiment, that unfor-\ntunately hides in me. Thus, Sir, you see when faith is lacking, it becomes\nimpossible to create certain states of happiness, for we lack the necessary humility.\nVaingloriously, we try to substitute ourselves for this faith, creating thus for\nthe rest of the world a reality which we believe after their fashion, while, actually,\nit doesn't exist. For each one of us has his own reality to be respected before\nGod, even when it is harmful to one's self.\nThe Manager. There is something in what you say. I assure you all\nthis interests me very much. I begin to think there's the stuff for a drama in\nall this, and not a bad drama either.\nThe Step-Daughter (coming forward). When you've got a character\nlike me.\nThe Father (shutting her up, all excited to learn the decision of the Man-\nager). You be quiet !\nThe Manager (;reflecting, heedless of interruption). It's new. . . hem .. .\nyes. . .\nThe Father. Absolutely new!\nThe Manager. You've got a nerve though, I must say, to come here\nand fling it at me like this ....\nThe Father. \\ou will understand, Sir, born as we are for the stage .. .\nThe Manager. Are you amateur actors then ?\nThe Father. No. I say born for the stage, because .. .\nThe Manager. Oh, nonsense. You're an old hand, you know."}, {"page_pdf": 22, "page_imprimee": "203", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.22", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2283, "texte": "The Father. No, Sir, no. We act that role for which we have been\ncast, that role which we are given in life. And in my own case, passion itself,\nas usually happens, becomes a trifle theatrical when it is exalted.\nThe Manager. Well, well, that will do. But you see, without an author\n... I could give you the address of an author if you liked . . .\nThe Father. No, no. Look here ! You must be the author.\nThe Manager. I ? What are you talking about ?\nThe Father. Yes, you, you. Why not ?\nThe Manager. Because I have never been an author: that's why.\nThe Father. Then why not turn author now ? Everybody does it.\nYou don't want any special qualities. Your task is made much easier by the\nfact that we are all here alive before you . . .\nThe Manager. It won't do.\nThe Father. What ? When you see us live our drama .. .\nThe Manager. Yes, that's all right. But you want someone to write it.\nThe Father. No, no. Someone to take it down possibly while we play\nit, scene by scene. It will be enough to sketch it out at first, and then try it\nover.\nThe Manager. Well. . . lam almost tempted. It's a bit of an idea.\nOne might have a shot at it.\nThe Father. Of course. You'll see what scenes will come out of it. I\ncan give you one at once . . .\nThe Manager. By Jove, it tempts me. I'd like to have a go at it.\nLet's try it out. Come with me to my office (turning to the Actors). You\nare at liberty for a bit, but don't stop out of the theatre for long. In a quarter\nof an hour, twenty minutes all back here again (to the Father). We'll see what\ncan be done. Who knows if we don't get something really extraordinary out\nof it ?\nThe Father. There's no doubt about it. They (indicating the Characters)\nhad better come with us too, hadn't they ?\nThe Manager. Yes, yes. Come on ! come on ! (moves away and then\nturning to the actors). Be punctual please. (Manager and the Six Characters\ncross the stage and go off. The other actors remain, looking at one another in astonish-\nment).\nLeading Man. Is he serious ? What the devil does he want to do ?\nJuveniee Lead. This is rank madness.\nThird Actor. Does he expect to knock up a drama in five minutes ?\nJuveniee Lead. Like the improvisers.\nLeading Lady. If he thinks I'm going to take part in a joke like this . .\nJuvenieE Lead. I'm out of it anyway."}, {"page_pdf": 23, "page_imprimee": "204", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.23", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 914, "texte": "Fourth Actor. I should like to know who they are (alludes to Charac-\nters).\nThird Actor. What do you suppose ? Madmen or rascals.\nIyEAD. And he takes them seriously.\nI/Ing£nue. Vanity. He fancies himself as an author now.\nIvBADiNG Man. It's absolutely unheard of. If the stage has come to\nthis .. . well I'm .. .\nFifth Actor. It's rather a joke.\nThird Actor. Well, we'll see what's going to happen next.\n{Thus talking, the actors leave the stage ; some going out by the little door at\nthe back ; others retiring to their dressing-rooms.\nThe curtain remains up.\nThe action of the play is suspended for twenty minutes).\nThe dramatic rights of Signor Pirandello*s comedy Six Characters in Search of an Author\nare secured for the following countries : U. S. of America, England, France, Holland, Germ-\nany and Hungary in all of which the play will be produced this year.\n\nLuigi Pirandello\n(Translated By Edward Storer)"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c006", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c006", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "205", "page_fin": "205", "image_debut": 24, "image_fin": 24, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.6", "titre_corps": "A Last Word", "titre_sommaire": "A Last Word", "signature_source": "Henry Bellaman", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 24, "page_imprimee": "205", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.24", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 640, "texte": "A LAST WORD\nYou are lying under coffin glass today.\nSo soon !\nIt seems we must have run\ntrhough all the days,\nbreathlessly,\nto be here — so soon.\nAnd the winds that sped with us\ndown the slanting roads —\nthey huddle back. ,\nThe motion, the tending,\nthe flight —\nstill like stars in deep water.\nTo-night you keep your tryst\nwith earth.\nWill you remember —\nin the vast ecstasies of silence —\nwill you remember that other night\nin April ?\nAnd remembering, will the cool dark\nthrill for you\nas quiet waters thrill\nat gold finch flight above them ?\nOh, you must remember !\nCan you hear me whisper it again —\ncan you —\nagainst your coffin glass ?"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c007", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c007", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "206", "page_fin": "206", "image_debut": 25, "image_fin": 25, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.7", "titre_corps": "Hedges", "titre_sommaire": "Hedges", "signature_source": "Henry Bellaman", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 25, "page_imprimee": "206", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.25", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 741, "texte": "HEDGES\nHenry Bellaman\nHedges have good manners . . .\nimposing order . . .\nThings grow straight\nand keep in place\nand breeds don't mix.\nWhite buds stay white\nand red stay red\nwith no indecent streaking\nin the flower.\nCedars have room\nto shape themselves rotundly . . .\nThere are shears for vines\nthat rise by easy handholds.\nBut even a garden remembers . . .\nremembers the thick choking,\nthe strangling climbers\nblossoming scarlet above tense quivers.\nOh, the long straight rise to the sun !\nOh, the rough winds from the snows !\nthe trampling,\nthe crowding,\nthe wild sap,\nthe unhampered seeding 1\nHedges have good manners . . .\nthings grow straight in rows.\nWeak things bloom free —\ncertain slow and strong things\nwait the gardener's passing."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c008", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c008", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "207", "page_fin": "209", "image_debut": 26, "image_fin": 28, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.8", "titre_corps": "Jacques Lipchitz and My Portrait Bust", "titre_sommaire": "Jacques Lipchitz and My Portrait Bust", "signature_source": "Jean Cocteau", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 26, "page_imprimee": "207", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.26", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1865, "texte": "JACQUES LIPCHITZ AND MY PORTRAIT BUST\n\nThe critics have never been able to remove a hair from my head, but\nIyipchitz has decapitated me . This is how the thing was done. I passed one\nhour every day on a platform, held rigid by the mortal cold which radiates from\nstone blocks and falls from the slanting window panes like a meat chopper.\nI buried my feet in sabots, my body in shawls and an old army coat; my head\npale, as a convicted prisoner's, emerging from the disorder.\nThe cold hypnotized me and gave me the strange feeling of surgical opera-\ntions. Thus I found myself rigid and without strength, ready to submit to the\nexperiment. The problem was to combine light and shade in my likeness, not\nby copying my face and then simplifying it, nor by deforming it afterwards on\nthe pretext of style.\nI have seen the unbelievable patience necessary for taming light and bring-\ning it within arm's reach. The task is simple enough ;it only consists in build-\ning a trap. Then the sculptor or hunter has no further worry. He lies in wait\nfor the light, cajoles it, frightens it; bullies it, using all the means by which one\ntames the most nervous animals.\nBut though Iyipchitz, after having completely renounced the sphere —\nwhich is the dormant force and epitome of the Greek ideal — rediscovered the\nskeleton of architecture and recreated about it a new flesh that has, shall we\nsay, nothing of the human figure, he yet considers the portrait bust as an ex-\nceptional problem.\nHe avoids the monstrous. His figures, like certain painted effigies of Pic-\nasso, no longer repel as being caricatured humanity. They give us an image\nof the truer than the true, the real aim of the contemporary artist when he does\nnot limit himself to simple decorative experiments.\nSculpture is an austere art. Painting is still a simulacrum. It hides its\nnakedness under rich colours."}, {"page_pdf": 28, "page_imprimee": "209", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.28", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2121, "texte": "The public likes to have a role reserved for it. Cubism already displeased\nit on account of the small opportunity it left for the collaboration of the\nspectator amused by the drawings.\nThink of the courage of the sculptor. What are his artifices ? In the case of\nLipchitz, I shall point out two. The first is to distribute his masses in such a\nway that the statue unfolds like a fa£ade. Mere curiosity will move the beholder\nto look behind. The second artifice is that the statue has a spiral development,\nand obliges the onlooker to go all round it. Thus the necessarily stable work —\nsince Iyipchitz renounces the trick of L'homme qui marche — will benefit by the\ndynamism which this manoeuvre awakens in the beholder.\nA trifling artifice compared with those which-painters, musicians and poets\nuse without the slightest dishonesty.\nMany artists of our group, born to be audacious, cherish certain routines.\nAnd it is in trying them and coming to grief with them that they obtain their\ncharm. Chance perfumes these seductive works. Lipchitz, on the contrary,\nis consciousness itself. He goes where he wants to go. The beauty of what he\nis working at crowns his calculations. How may times have I seen him made\nill when an indiscreet lady visitor has been looking for the likeness in one of\nhis guitarists — regular buildings inhabited from top to bottom by a soul.\nTherefore a fresh problem presents itself to Iyipchitz the portraitist, since\nhe never does things by halves. Neither the cast, the stylization nor the mon-\nstrousness. What remains ? A hunt for light more difficult than writing differ-\nent sentences with the right and left hand. A terrible hunt with all kinds of\nsmall arms, silences, unheard of halts.\nThe two quarries draw near light first. It lies down and allows itself to\nbe caressed. After comes likeness.\nThe capture of likeness was a very long affair. Brusquely, like the effect\nof a drug on the organism, it came from all sides. It was captured. And the\nday in which the two savage beasts understood each other to perfection and\nbecame domestic animals, Iyipchitz decapitated me.\n\nJean Cocteau"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c009", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c009", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "208", "page_fin": "208", "image_debut": 27, "image_fin": 27, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.9", "titre_corps": "Jean Cocteau", "titre_sommaire": "Jean Cocteau", "signature_source": "Lipchitz", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 27, "page_imprimee": "208", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.27", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 21, "texte": "Lipchitz\nJean Cocteau"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c010", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c010", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "210", "page_fin": "215", "image_debut": 29, "image_fin": 34, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.10", "titre_corps": "Improvisations : Lights and Snow", "titre_sommaire": "Improvisations : Lights and Snow", "signature_source": "Conrad Aiken", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 29, "page_imprimee": "210", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.29", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 901, "texte": "IMPROVISATIONS : LIGHTS AND SNOW\n\nI.\nThe girl in the rocm beneath\nBefore going to bed\nStrums softly on a mandolin\nThe three simple tunes she knows.\nHow inadequate they are to tell what her heart feels !\nWhen she has finished them several\nShe thrums the strings softly with her fingernails\nAnd smiles, and thinks happily of many things.\nII.\nI stood for a long while before the shop window\nLooking at the blue butterflies embroidered on tawny silk.\nThe building was a tower before me,\nTime was loud behind me,\nSun went over the housetops and dusty trees.\nAnd there they were, glistening, brilliant, motionless,\nStitched in a golden sky\nBy yellow patient fingers long since turned to dust.\nIII.\nOn the day when my uncle and I drove to the cemetery\nRain rattled on the roof of the carriage ;\nAnd talking constrainedly of this and that\nWe refrained from looking at the child's coffin on the seat before us."}, {"page_pdf": 30, "page_imprimee": "211", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.30", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1033, "texte": "When we reached the cemetery,\nWe found that the thin snow on the grass\nWas already half transparent with rain,\nAnd boards had been laid upon it\nSo that we might walk without wetting our feet\nIV.\nWhen I was a boy, and saw bright rows of icicles\nIn many lengths along a wall,\nI was disappointed to find\nThat I could not play music upon them :\nIran my fingers lightly across them\nAnd they fell, tinkling.\nI tell you this, young man, so that your expectations\nOf life will not be too great.\nV.\nIt is now two hours since I left you,\nAnd the perfume of your hands is still on my hands.\nAnd though, since then,\nI have looked at the stars, walked in the cold blue streets,\nAnd heard the dead leaves blowing over the ground\nUnder the trees,\nI still remember the sound of your laughter. . .\nHow will it be, lady, when there is none to remember you\nEven as long as this ?\nWill the dust braid your hair ?\nVI.\nThe day opens with the brown light of snowfall\nAnd past the window snowflakes fall and fall.\nI sit in my chair all day and work and work"}, {"page_pdf": 31, "page_imprimee": "212", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.31", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1450, "texte": "Measuring words against each other.\nI open the piano and play a tune\nBut find it does not say what I feel,\nI grow tired of measuring delicate words against each other,\nI grow tired of these four walls,\nAnd I think of you, who write me that you have just had a daughter,\nAnd named her after your first sweetheart;\nAnd you, who break your heart, far away,\nIn the dullness and savagery of a long war ;\nAnd you, who, worn by the bitterness of winter,\nWill- soon go South . . .\nThe snowflakes fall almost straight in the brown light\nPast my window,\nAnd a sparrow finds refuge on my window-ledge.\nThis alone comes to me out of the world outside\nAs I measure word with word.\nVII.\nMany things perplex me and leave me troubled,\nMany things are locked away in the white book of stars\nNever to be opened by me.\nThe starred leaves are silently turned,\nAnd the mooned leaves ;\nAnd as they are turned fall the shadows of life and death. . .\nPerplexed and troubled,\nI light a small light in a small room,\nThe lighted walls come closer to me,\nThe familiar pictures are clear.\nI sit in my favourite chair and turn in my mind\nThe tiny pages of my own life, whereon so little is written,\nAnd hear at the eastern window the pressure of a long wind, coming\nFrom I know not where.\nHow many times have I sat here,\nHow many times will I sit here again,\nThinking these same things over and over in solitude\nAs a child says over and over\nThe first word he has learned to say !"}, {"page_pdf": 32, "page_imprimee": "213", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.32", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1203, "texte": "VIII.\nThis girl gave her heart to me,\nAnd this, and this ;\nThis one looked at me as if she loved me,\nAnd silently walked away.\nThis one I saw once, and loved, and saw her never again.\nShall I count them for you upon my fingers ?\nOr like a priest solemnly sliding beads ?\nOr pretend they are roses, pale pink, yellow, and white,\nAnd arrange them for you in a wide bowl\nTo be set in sunlight ?\nSee how nicely it sounds as I count them for you —\n' This girl gave her heart to me,\nAnd this, and this ! . . '\nAnd nevertheless my heart breaks when I think of them\nWhen I think their names,\nAnd how, like leaves, they have changed and blown\nAnd will lie at last, pitifully forgotten,\nUnder the snow.\nIX.\nIt is night-time, and cold, and snow is falling,\nAnd no wind grieves the walls.\nIn the small circle of light around the arc-lamp\nA swarm of snow-flakes falls and falls.\nThe street grows silent. The last stranger passes,\nAnd the sound of his feet in the snow is indistinct.\nWhat old sadness is it, on a night like this,\nTakes possession of my heart ?\nWhy do I think of a camellia tree in a southern garden\nWith pink blossoms among dark leaves,\nStanding surprised in the snow ?\nAnd why do I think of spring ?"}, {"page_pdf": 33, "page_imprimee": "214", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.33", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1271, "texte": "The snowflakes, delicately veering,\nFall silently past my window;\nThey come from darkness and enter darkness.\nWhat is it in my heart is surprised and bewildered\nLike that camellia tree,\nBeautiful\" still in its glittering anguish ? . . .\nAnd spring so far away !\nX.\nAs I walked through the lamplit gardens\nOn the thin white crust of snow\nSo intensely was I thinking of my misfortune,\nSo clearly were my eyes fixed\nOn the face of this grief which has come to me,\nThat I did not notice the beautiful pale coloring\nOf lamplight on the snow;\nNor the interlaced long blue shadows of trees ;\nAnd yet these things were there,\nAnd the white lamps, and orange lamps, and lamps of lilac were there,\nAs I have seen them so often before ;\nAs they will be so often again\nLong after my grief is forgotten.\nAnd still, though I know this, and say this, it cannot console me.\nXI.\nHow many times have we been interrupted\nJust as I was about to make up a story for you ! . . .\nOne time it was because we suddenly saw a firefly\nlighting his green lantern among the boughs of a fir-tree.\nMarvellous ! marvellous ! He is making for himself\nA little tent of light in the darkness ! . . .\nAnd one time it was because we saw a lilac lightning-flash\nRun wrinkling into the blue top of a mountain, —"}, {"page_pdf": 34, "page_imprimee": "215", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.34", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 958, "texte": "We heard boulders of sound rolling down upon us,\nAnd the plat-plat of drops on the window,\nAnd we ran to watch the rain\nCharging in wavering white clouds across the long grass of the field. .\nOr at other times it was because we saw a star\nSlipping easily out of the sky, and falling, far off,\nAmong pine-dark hills ;\nOr because we found a crimson evet\nDarting in the cold grass !—\nThese things interrupted us, and left us wondering ;\nAnd the stories, whatever they might have been,\nWere never told.\nA fairy binding a daisy down and laughing ?\nA golden-haired princess caught in a cobweb ?\nA love-story of long ago ? . .\nSome day, just as we are beginning again,\nJust as we blow the first sweet note,\nDeath itself will interrupt us.\nXII.\nIyike an old tree uprooted by the wind\nAnd flung down cruelly\nWith roots bared to the sun and stars,\nAnd fading leaves brought to earth —\nTorn from its house —\n. So do I seem to myself\nWhen you have left me.\n\nConrad Aiken"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c011", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c011", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "216", "page_fin": "216", "image_debut": 35, "image_fin": 35, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.11", "titre_corps": "Sculpture", "titre_sommaire": "Sculpture", "signature_source": "Lipchitz", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 35, "page_imprimee": "216", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.35", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 18, "texte": "Lipchitz\nSculpture"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c013", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c013", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "217", "page_fin": "217", "image_debut": 36, "image_fin": 36, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.12", "titre_corps": "Sculpture", "titre_sommaire": "Sculpture", "signature_source": "Lipchitz", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 36, "page_imprimee": "217", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.36", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 18, "texte": "Lipchitz\nSculpture"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c014", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c014", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "218", "page_fin": "218", "image_debut": 37, "image_fin": 37, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.13", "titre_corps": "The Technique of Jacques Lipchitz", "titre_sommaire": "The Technique of Jacques Lipchitz", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 37, "page_imprimee": "218", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.37", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2762, "texte": "THE TECHNIQUE OF JACQUES LIPCHITZ\nAt the beginning of his career Jacques Iyipchitz executed works which\nwere distinguished by their artistic maturity. With rapid strides he advanced to-\nwards that complete grasp of form which is the final aim of all artists haunted\nby the ideal of perfection. Enamoured of harmony, he eliminated anatomic\ndetails, simplified his technique and circumscribed his figures within the limits\nof the oval or the sphere. He seemed thus to conform to the principles which\ngovern modern sculpture in France, and cultivated with rare skill those artisan\nvirtues which have sufficed to place among the masters a large number of second\nrate artists. But as soon as he foresaw the danger to his art from the break-\ning up of the plastic equilibrium, Jacques Iyipchitz attempted a rehabilitation.\nTo the spherical form, which was the essential basis of his work, he added the\ncubic formula. Iyight, hitherto distributed gradually over the volumes, mo-\ndulated like painted surfaces, now exaggerates the differentiation of the planes\nin space. In eliminating from his works the spherical forms which might lessen\nthe specifically spatial character of his sculpture, Iyipchitz expresses depth, not\nby movement but by contrast of direction. His art is objective and self-suffi-\ncient. It excludes all sentimental relation between the statue and the specta-\ntor. It is characterized by the preponderance of the cubic element. The her-\nmetic character of Iyipchitz has been much discussed. Are the statues dehu-\nmanized a priori and stripped of all emotional content ? We do not think so.\nBut the artist, having decided to construct arhitectural unities, found it neces-\nsary to convert into uniform plastic elements the constituent parts of the hetero-\ngenous bodies which he represented. Thus the hair, the flesh, and the draperies\nof a stone woman, instead of being differentiated realistically, form an homogenous\norganism, determined by the laws of the medium out of which they are created.\nEach fragment of such a work though incorporated in the whole, has assigned to\nit a special r6le independent of its representative value. On the other hand, this\nprinciple of economy imposes on the artist certain constructive processes such as\nthe interpenetration of adjoining planes, whose object is to reduce to the minimum\nrepetitions in the body. In binding contiguous masses Jacques Iyipchitz achieves\norganic unity. The need for full expression has always been one of his gravest\npreoccupations.\nIyipchitz's statues mean nothing but themselves. They are accessible only\nto those who show themselves capable of disassociating the plastic from the re-\npresentative element, those who appreciate a work of art exclusively for arti-\nstic reasons. «"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c015", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c015", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "219", "page_fin": "219", "image_debut": 38, "image_fin": 38, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.14", "titre_corps": "Sculpture", "titre_sommaire": "Sculpture", "signature_source": "Lipchitz", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 38, "page_imprimee": "219", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.38", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 18, "texte": "Lipchitz\nSculpture"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c016", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c016", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "220", "page_fin": "235", "image_debut": 39, "image_fin": 54, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.15", "titre_corps": "Murder", "titre_sommaire": "Murder", "signature_source": "Waldo Frank", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 39, "page_imprimee": "220", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.39", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1643, "texte": "MURDER\n\nAt the hall's one end two doors, dim with the light that came through\nwired glass : making of all a cross with black tree, short luminous arms.\nNow at one moment the two doors opened. 'Two women closed them and\nstood, shadows against frail light, looked at each other.\nEach thought:\n\" She too is going to have a child ! \"\nThe tall woman smiled, the smile spoke.\n\" I have not seen you before. We just moved in. \"\nThe short woman smiled, but her smile was in the dark . . .\nThey walked down stairs feeling each other's steps. The short stout\nwoman, careful of her steps, she was shy. She felt in her back this other —\nnot like her name she had read on the vestibule plate .. . Breddan. — She\ndon't seem Irish. The front door let them out. Sunshine vibrant and shrill,\nfull of motes, full of wagons and dirt and children and themselves dancing\nthere against the dark house and each other. The tall woman faced her. —\nShe is lovely, she is like her voice , . .\nI.\nAnna Suchy opened her door. Sophie Breddan stood still against the little\nwoman's silence, she understood it : she came in. Anna was thinking .. .\noften since their first moment she had thought — I wonder, could she like me ?\nWe are both Czech. But she is married to a swell Irish politician, my Michael's\na Subway guard : I wonder, could she like me ?\n\" Will you mind coming this way ? \" She led Sophie Breddan back to\na dim kitchen : brown wall paper sucked away its light. She did not say that\ntheir front light room was always rented to Mr. Kandro.\n\" I hope I am not disturbing you, \" said Sophie.\n\" O no, I am sewing. \"\n\" I brought mine along too. We can sew together. \""}, {"page_pdf": 40, "page_imprimee": "221", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.40", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2341, "texte": "Often they sewed together . . .\nSophie's flat was all hers — just her man and hers. It was full of light.\nNext door on that side was the empty lot and the windows had sun, not alley.\nIt was finer in Sophie's apartment. But Sophie never said, having once just\nstopped from saying : \" Come over always, Anna. The light's so much better. \"\nThey exchanged visits.\nTheir men did not count : they did not speak of their men. Anna was\nafraid of meeting an Irish politician : Sophie had no feel of the being of Michael\nSuchy. It was not these things. Simply, they looking at one another, feeling\nthe sacrament of their own life in one another, feeling themselves so, their\nmen did not count.\nThey were not solemn, feeling herself in the other. They were like trees in\nthe Spring, giving forth blossom. So Anna chattered. She sat there plump, far\nback in her rocker, rocking. Her feet did not touch the floor when she leaned\nfar back and chattered. White stockings brimmed over the wrinkled shoes.\nThey were like her chatter. Above them a grey dress : a round bare flat face\nwith blue eyes, sharp like her chattering that came from a silence in her, solid\nand sure like her grey-covered body. Sophie sat at her sewing machine : while\nAnna chattered, listening she hummed. Naked arms, thin, very long upon the\nwood and the white cloth. Black hair drawn tight and knotted to the neck.\nIyips full against her slender all, 'red lips upon paleness: lips clear and blooded\nas if fine steel had chiselled their edge.\nSophie turned her face, unmoving her naked arms: then Anna saw her\neyes like slow fires buried within a snow at night. Sophie worked and hummed :\nAnna felt her eyes. — She likes me, she likes me ... In knowledge of that,\nAnna chattered like an infant at play in a warm high crib.\nSophie went to bed.\nThere was a doctor : two doctors : three ... A trained nurse. A husband\nfluttering ever near, unapproachable, unapproached, like flesh of a man caught\nin a moving wheel. . . There was a dead child.\nSophie lay on, at the wheel's center/still: J drop by drop life that had\ngushed from her crawled hesitant back.\nShe could reach out a hand, take another hand and press it, press almost\na smile to her lips — not her eyes yet. She could feel sorry for her man, and\nsuffer for him, feel her suffering not enough for his, and stroke at last quite"}, {"page_pdf": 41, "page_imprimee": "222", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.41", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2640, "texte": "naturally his pain as she must have her child's misery who was dead. She\nwas able to ask for Anna. Then Anna went to bed.\nAnna's child was a girl. . . seven pounds .. . Hilda. Sophie lying grey\nin her bright room knew how Hilda had come into that dark other flat as the\nSun always noiselessly into her own. There was night, there was day : so\neasily.\nShe placed her cool hands on her hot eyes, over her face. So she lay,\nbehind and yet within herself. Swaying. Swaying within her arms and\nslender hands. She had a sense of her man in the other room, sitting in a chair\nand trying to reason.\n\"We must be sensible, \" she was sure he said to himself. Sensible. His\nboyish face was less ruddy, his lips she knew were a little twisted. Twisted and\npale with being sensible. There were diagonal furrows on his brow with being\nsensible. His nails were bitten to the quick with being sensible. He was all\ntortured and out of himself with being calm there, sensible. Sophie stretched\nher body very long in her hot bed, down to where it was cooler : she forgot\nVictor. She stretched her feet, lying upon her back, in order to be longer. She\nwas sudden at peace. Her arms were at her side, very flat: her palms lay up-\nward upon each side of her face. Her face and her palms looked upward. Her\nlips were parted. Her face and palms, her mouth looked upward : her face\nand her mouth were warm with happy tears.\n\" I will be strong — right away — very soon. Next time it will be\ngood : go well. \" She slept.\\\nVictor Breddan sat tense in his chair and summarized the talk he\nhad had with Doctor Lacey. He sat very tense at work, making up his\nmind.\nThis was a blow and he resented it. He did not' know,* but he resented\nSophie who had brought it upon him. An unknown unsought, gaugeless ele-\nment, his resenting, to merge in the making up his mind.\nVictor was very young, successful. He was the Confidential Clerk of Su-\npreme Court Justice Targett, and Justice Targett too was young for one in his\nposition, ambitious for more position. He liked Victor, Victor knew .. . and\nthere was a high way before them they must travel together. Victor sat very\nstill in his chair, and leaned on the vision that was easily his, as if it had been\nhimself, of Justice Targett writing a Decision.\nIt was impossible to bring the Doctor to a commitment. — \" I do not\nknow, I cannot say... whether Mrs. Breddan should be again subjected to child-\nbirth. \". . . There was a risk, and yet perhaps this was a mere mischance.\nOne can't be sure .. . one cannot be too careful. She 'is young, healthy .. .\nAnd yet there's a risk . . Always, perhaps ? Better wait .. . The Doctor"}, {"page_pdf": 42, "page_imprimee": "223", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.42", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2314, "texte": "did not feel he could be responsible :. . why not let matters drift for a while ?\nwas the retreat of the Doctor.\nVictor had ideas of his own. The vaguenesses of Doctor came into\nthe form of them like a gas, and filled them. Victor sat there, filling his mind\nthat was already a form.\nVictor was sure he loved his wife, and almost he had lost her. His savings\nwere wiped out, there were debts :he needed savings. Beyond was the high\nway he must be travelling with Justice Targett : a high way with high barriers\nwhere one needed to pay high tolls. Risk, shock, wastage. So this had been :\nso at least for the time of the crucial years of his career ahead, it must not be\nagain.\nVictor Breddan sat in a calm body. His chestnut hair rose like an ordered\nhedge from his narrow forehead. His mouth was pursed. A dimple in his\nchin. His hands were clasped on a knee.\nThen his shoulders moved upward. He got up stiff. He undressed. He\nfolded away his clothes. He lay beside his wife.\nShe was moving warmly through a water of deep sleep. Sleep laved her,\nit was passionate soft like the touch of her child within herself, as had been\nher hand laid on her swelling stomach. Now, a cold current cutting like silver\nthrough the dark sea of her sleep.. . She awoke. Victor beside her. He slept\nsoundly: he had filled up his mind.\n2.\nRose from her bed and moved about her world a tall gaunt woman with\nlips cut as by steel, with lips moveless as she spoke. She lived ; the world called\nSophie, called Mrs. Breddan ; she answered the world.\nHer husband was calm with his filled-up mind. Each morning he went down\ntown, at evening returned laden with papers and a weighted silence under all his\nwords. Her husband was full with his ambitious life. She came to understand\nthe hard will of her husband .. . She did not understand, but she felt that it\nwas cruel. She received his cruelty, and the seed of fear that lives in cruelty\nlike a seed in a hard shell she received also. She was a woman, she was a receiv-\ner of seed. She was a woman who needed other seed than the hard dead will\nof her husband.\nHe lay beside her at night. He was very near and aloof : a dull knife\nthat her love threw herself upon, and that would not cut her. She was all whole :\nlike a knot she lay writhed beneath her man who would not cut her and loose"}, {"page_pdf": 43, "page_imprimee": "224", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.43", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2600, "texte": "her. She went forth from him into the hammering world : it also would not\nloose her. She was in no way burst open.\nAnna Suchy kneaded her bread, nursed her child : with stout strong arms\nshe held and released her husband. She was a multitude of duties. Her eyes\nwere a little closer upon the bareness of her face. She had no time to visit\nSophie in her flat. Sophie came more and more to her, explainless, silent.\nAnna was glad. She bustled and chattered about the silence of her friend\nlike a flock of sparrows about a branch in winter. Wherever her duties took her,\nSophie was willing to be. Sophie lived in the need of helping, helping no matter\nhow with Hilda. But Anna was a woman and a mother, simple and elemental\nbeyond help. She had her nest to build, her child to nurture. lyike any female.\nBuilt to work alone. And this was the closest of Anna's duties. Motherhood\ncame from her fingers as her breasts like its intricate web from a spider's spin-\nnerets. Sophie sat silent :at times she held the child, placed her in the crib,\nmoved the crib. She sat with still eyes following the mother's hands and lips\nas she washed the baby.\nSophie came to swing with a dull beat between her emptiness and her\nfriend's fullness. She dwelt nowhere. Neither her world nor the other world\ncould she take wholly to her. She swung, dully. Her mouth was very still.\nHer seeking, swung contrariwise to her imprisoned body. She was in\nconflict: a slow dizziness came to live within the eyes of Sophie.\nShe knew that Anna loved her. She was thankful. She was thankful\nas a mute creature — as a cat is thankful who gleans of a strange creature's\nlove the right to lie by a stove. Anna was strange to Sophie : she used her\nlove like a mute hungry creature. And Anna in her love for Sophie was moved\nout of herself : out of her comfort, out of her domain : into a world of limitless\nhorizon whither her mind and her instincts could not follow. Her care for child\nand man was of her flesh. It fitted, it was heiself, it was within her like her\nheart that went on working. Her love for Sophie was not of her : it stood upon\nher. Sheer and separate it stood where God had placed it. Her love of man\nand child was buiied in her like a heart : it did not see it had no need of seeing.\nHer love for this woman who came and did nothing and was silent was an Eye\nupon her. It looked out. It beheld. But what it beheld it could not bring\nto Anna's mind in words. For Anna had no understanding of the beholding of\nher love. She could only be gentle to her friend, and chatter cheerily, see\nand be sorry that she was unhappy."}, {"page_pdf": 44, "page_imprimee": "225", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.44", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2194, "texte": "Sophie walked westward through the high brimming Block . . . through\nothers growing gradually neater, harsher, less alive ... to the Park.\nShe sat among children.\nThey wrreathed about her in curves and flares of movement that had her\nheart for center. They were about her as her feelings within her. Little boys\nwith serious mouths in leather leggins and fur caps ; little girls, gold-curled,\nbundled in blue-wool. . . played, shouted, leaped like particles of light in a\nconcentric rainbow. Sophie sat still in the cold air, on the cold bench, feeling\ntheir luminous warmth.\nAside her, on benches, thrust away from her world, nurses in hard lines.\nShe saw them talking among themselves, sufficient among themselves, opaque\nto children. Hard voices thrust back to the world of children orders. Voices\nof women, brittle and weak beside this chaos of colors.\nSophie's agony was bright with the dancing colors of children. Her\nagony was her life : she sat cold and still, but there was her agony within the\nflames of children, her life . . . burning her, making her yet warm. '\nNurses were long strokes blotting. They covered something Sophie could\nnot see . . .\nAcross the walk, alone, sat a nurse clad in blue. Blue cape caught lissomly\nabout her slender shoulders. Blue brimless bonnet, tucked with an organdie\nwhite . . . bow beneath white pointed chin. . . sat clear on clear hair, Sophie's\neyes met eyes that drew her. She crossed and sat with the nurse on the green\nbench. She said no word. Sophie and the nurse felt each other, saying\nno word.\nA boy played with a hoop. He beat it savagely with his stick when it\nrefused to roll: he got on his knees to beat it savagely. He beat at the heart of\nSophie . . .\nSudden she said : \" The mothers — all the mothers of all these children —\nwhat do they do ? Where are they ? They're not all working, are they ? —\nnot all dead ? . . . \"\nThe blue nurse did not turn.\n\" All dead, \" she answered.\nSophie waited.\n\" Alive ... all dead. \"\n— \" All dead \" was a high hard stroke of cloud, it beat, it bled the dancing\nof children .. . Children \\ bled and drooped .. . children danced no more .. .\n\" All dead. \"\nSharply Sophie got up. She walked away, slow."}, {"page_pdf": 45, "page_imprimee": "226", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.45", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1945, "texte": "She walked away from a world whose heart she was. She could no longer bear\nthis being its heart. She returned to her flat.\nShe opened, shut the door. She sat in a chair. She was not conscious of\nher passage from the Park.\nIt was late morning. She did not stir. Sun placed a finger on her foot.\nHis finger rose. His finger rose ... It lit the matted hair on her ear. She\n# ♦\nhad not stirred.\nHer husband entered. She did not stir ...\nShe turned her head, heavy . . . looked at her man with a look so weighted\nit took time to reach him. He bent and kissed her.\n\" Tired, sweetheart ? \"\nHer mind threw a happening before her eyes she had not known when it\nwas borne to her. Now ... a tall blond boy — young man finely tall —\nwith thick hair, thin hands, as she passed coming home on the Block, a tall\nfine man — he stops : he looks at her : he is graceful standing.\nTender inquiry in his eyes, as not now in her husband's ! . . .\nSophie flung herself into her husband's arms.\nShe felt his hands holding her body, claiming it, drinking it, that way he\nhad . . . hands eager for themselves.\n\"Me... me ! \" she cried silently in her throat.\nHe kissed her. He was very content, very happy. — She loves me. .. .\n3.\nAnna was small and ashamed, half suppliant, half exultant before\nthe tense body of her friend. Sophie's face was turned away in order not to\nsee: now her body saw and it throbbed like steel against her naked\nnerves.\nAnna was going to have another baby.\nComing that day into her kitchen Sophie knew this. She said nothing,\nher neck strained fiercely now with her averted face. She turned her eyes\nfull to the pleading eyes of Anna : she placed her hands on Anna's shoulders.\nShe kissed her eyes.\n\" Have you known long ? \"\n\"No — I — just .. . \" Anna was pale, eyes brimmed. She took\nSophie's hand, the other. . . stroked them together, held them hot against her\ncheek. \" You are so wonderful! \" she exclaimed.\n\" So wonderful, \" smiled Sophie."}, {"page_pdf": 46, "page_imprimee": "227", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.46", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2173, "texte": "One great change. Sophie no longer yearned to do caring things for Hilda.\nShe was glad now of Anna's subjective motherhood. She did not realise, in\nits true terms, this change. Merely that she was more at peace : as she sat\nnow in Anna's kitchen peace was nearer . . . waiting, waiting . . . and this she\naccepted, docilely, mute, as a driven beast after the work-day night.\nThe months went. Anna was heavier, more languid : she allowed her\nfriend to do more things for her. She allowed her to sweep the kitchen, to bring\nfresh water to the room of Mr. Kandro. She allowed her to scrub the floors.\nShe gave her orders. When Sophie broke a dish : \"My ! how can you be\nso careless ? \"\nSophie was in peace. She did not look at Hilda. She came at length\nnot even to look at Anna. Nearly all days, as the time grew near, she came\nto Anna and helped her. She needed to be near her .. . near her in order to\nbe waiting, in order to find the heart of waiting .. . She needed not to see her.\nShe helped her.\nSophie hated children.\nShe walked to the Park through the summer streets that were lush with\nthem, that were a surge and a delirium of children ; streets overflowed with shim-\nmering boys and girls, streets banked with heavy women, walled with arrogant\nsucking women's bellies. But she walked always on. She walked as if she had\nbeen swimming through a sea. If she stopped she must sink. No Park bench,\nno heat, no shade of a thick tree could make her stop. . . Until she was in\nher flat, limp, with dry eyes and with a skin scorched by the passion she had\nwalked through.\nWalking so, she did not perspire. Now seated still, she was soon drenched\nwith sweat.\nShe saw the tall boy — young man, finely tall — with thick hair, thin\nhands whose eyes, looking at her, gave her a tender touch. She never looked\nat him straight, he was there in her mind. He had a long, gentle face, pointed\nchin, blue eyes. He was good somehow in his rough grey shirt and his rough\ntweed suit and his low heavy shoes that showed the grace of his ankles.\nHe was frightened of her. He was like a woman. He was this boy, forever\nsweet in her averted mind where he stood aloof, slenderly, silent . . ."}, {"page_pdf": 47, "page_imprimee": "228", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.47", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2116, "texte": "... He walked directly in her path. She was flanked by warring children,\nearnest as only children. They were both blocked by children. They had\nto stand, facing each other, till the tangle unswarmed.\nShe saw him blush. His face was close. His eyes went out to hers, asking\na question. Her lips that were always moveless quivered.\n\" You are unhappy, \" she heard him.\nHer breathing was brutal strokes against her.\n\" Can't we go to the Park. . . and talk it over ? \" She heard him above\nthe clamor of her breathing.\n\"No : lam married. \" She heard herself beneath the clamor of her\nbreathing.\n\" But you're unhappy! \" She thought her breast would break with\nthis clamor of her breathing .. . She saw his eyes holding her. Then : — she\nsaw his mouth part, break with indecision. Her breathing lessened. Since\nhis mouth was so, she was able to pass him.\n.. . She said to herself : \"Am I unhappy ? \"\nShe said to herself : \" Why should I . . . just I . . . be unhappy so ? \"\nThen her thought turned : \" I am unhappy. \"\nShe was afraid. Each time this thought came to her, came too the young-\nman who had taught her. She did not want this. She put away the thought\nthought of the young man also. All her thought, all her feeling were deep tangled\nin this thought. She came, more and more, more and more easily, to put\naway all her thought, all her feeling.\nWhen she saw him in the Block, it was she who looked at him, like reach-\ning down for a Word that she had buried. It was he who could not look\nstraight : his face was clouded : turning away from her his face he turned into\nsome inner shadow.\nAnna went soon to bed, her child was a splendid girl, they christened her\nIvouisa.\nSophie shut one dim door, the hall was a black stroke upon her cheek,\nand opened the other. It was late afternoon and she must prepare her husband's\nsupper. She had been with Anna who lay in bed, very moist, very chatter-\nful, eager to get up. For Anna's feet and hands knew how to do. But\nher tongue was awkward. It was easier to do than to tell Sophie how. She\nwas hot and moist and comfortless in bed : healthy already : ready again to\nbegin."}, {"page_pdf": 48, "page_imprimee": "229", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.48", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2332, "texte": "She was cross with Sophie, giving her difficult orders, cross also with Mr.\nKandro who came early in order to be of use, these days with Anna in bed.\nThe big dark man moved noiselessly about, trying to be of use. The tops of\nhis cheeks gleamed white about the massed black beard : the white of his eyes\ngleamed under toppling brows. He was gentle and stupid, when Anna was cross\nhe smiled at Sophie, and Sophie who almost never smiled felt warm and\nsmiled — she couldn't to him — at Anna.\n\"Do you think lyouisa is a pretty name ? \" Sophie asked Victor.\n\"It will do. Why ? \"\n\" That's what they've called — Suchy's new little girl. \"\nVictor felt very vaguely a strangeness in Sophie's choice of words. Their\ndim recording of a world infinitely beyond his mind. He was cheerful tonight :\nhe had many things to say : all else faded.\n\" Well dear, I've good news. I can get named for Assemblyman if I\nwant to ! And there's the money in the Bank. \"\nHe got up, he stood behind Sophie's chair, he placed his hands about her\nthroat. \" Now you tell me, do I want it ? \"\nHis hand were a little heavy. Sophie was glad she could say :\n\" You are choking me, Victor. \"\nHe slipped his grasp to her chin, tilted her head.\n\" It's up to you. You decide, Darling. You decide eveiything. Shall\nI go to the Assembly ? \"\n\" What do they do in the Assembly ? \"\n\" Don't you know ? Make laws. \"\n\" You will make laws ? \"\nHe leaned and kissed her forehead. He was very sure of himself, sure of\nhis wife, sure of the kind of laws he would help make in the Assembly.\n\" Well ? \"\n\" Iyaws are funny things, \" said Sophie.\nWomen are funny things. \" Victor, a little hurt, stepped away.\n\" Women are serious things ... Or aren't they ?. . . \" She got up.\n\" Tell me, Victor, \" she said, \" tell me ... of course dear, I want you to\ngo to the Assembly. \"\nHe sat and pulled her down to him, and placed her on his knees. She was\nstiffly erect. She was as a tall as he was. Now her head was above him.\nAbove the neat containment of his profile, her full face, a smothered flame.\nBut she did not burn him. He smiled, living in his neat life, thinking in his\nneat thoughts, speaking in his well-ordered words. She burned in smother.\nHis plans . . his ambitions. He must remain free as he was .. . free of\ndebts, free of worry. With her whole to stand by him and share his plans,"}, {"page_pdf": 49, "page_imprimee": "230", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.49", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2590, "texte": "his ambitions. As he spoke, her head moved up and down, slowly, jerkily, in\na sort of sardonic rhythm with his words. Her breasts ached.\nShe got up. She placed her two forefingers stiff against his eyes so that\nhe needed to shut them.\n\" What would you do, \" she said, \"if I put out your eyes ? \"\nHe laughed. \" Women are funny things ! \"\nShe pressed her two forefingers. She felt the bulb of his eyes give in. She\nwithdrew her fingers into fists. Fists very hard and fierce beat against her\nbreasts, again and again, in silence, rhythmically, where they ached. He did\nnot hear their beating — with shut eyes.\n4.\nVictor, high-keyed and glowing as never before, was drab to Sophie as\nnever before. He was out of her world :he was happy and strong as she had\nnever made him in the earliness of their love, when he was a boy laying his\nhead on her lap and letting his fingers blindly stray to her face, to her mouth\nwhich kissed them. It was terrible, seeing him a man, and turned to a world\nthat seemed to love him since it made him glow, and that was not she. He\nwas less hers, less lovely to her. She saw him come in, bright-eyed, sharp-\nworded, in new clothes smart; he was drab to her. He told her of his nomina-\ntion, she stood as a stranger willing to applaud as if that had been all he could\nwant further of her. He spoke of his meetings, of his assurance of success,\nhe showed her letters; he had hushed words for the silent work of Justice Tar-\ngett. And she beheld him, outside the circle of her flame like a black dead world\nthat had been once within it. He asked her if she did not wish to come to\nthe Campaign meetings, she answered yes. . . and knew for the first time she\nhad lied to her man.\nHe did not press her. He was too happy in himself, letting this new\nworld time him up and away.\nShe was alone now evenings, also, alone. She lay on her back, dressed on\nher bed, and tried to recall a world in which it seemed to her she had been alive.\nA world to which she woke with sunlight dancing under her eyelids. A world\nin which, walking from her flat to the street, there was purpose and cheer. A\nworld in which it was natural to take food inorder to go on living in it: natural\nto love inorder to feel that she was living in it. A world in which the hours, for\nall the pain they held, pointed hopeward, sunward : where though at times the\nearth was packed with pain, about the earth was the Air, all about : infinite spaces\nfull of the Sun .. . She lay on her back and reached for her man who was hers,\nwho had his hands upon her and his lips. She could grasp nothing. Her mind"}, {"page_pdf": 50, "page_imprimee": "231", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.50", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2295, "texte": "was dull. It had a way of stopping upon a crack in the wall as if it had been\nan abyss.\nShe left Anna alone. She lay on her bed, she sat in her chair. When\nVictor was not to be home to supper, often she cooked no food for herself. Once\nwhen the bell rang, and she knew it was Anna, she did not respond.\nAnna said to herself : \" Sophie is very busy with her husband. He is\nrunning for the Election. She must be helping him or something \". Anna\ndid not believe this, she did not know what she believed : this she managed to\nsay to herself. It was enough.\nShe was busy. Louisa was a big child for her four months. Already she\ngave her a little milk from the bottle each day. The hands and the feet\nof Anna forever at work in her rooms did not miss Sophie. Her eyes missed\nher : but her eyes spoke feebly, when her hands and her feet were at work.\nShe sat, half turned away from the kitchen table. In her hand was a\nlarge piece of buttered bread and cheese. In her lap lay easefully balanced\na cup of coffee. Cake was on the table. Close to the door which was the\nsafest place sat Hilda who was two : looking at her mother, crooning and beg-\nging for food.\n\" No, you — you have had your lunch. Mama eat, once, won't\nyou ? You'll get so fat, you, I won't have room for you here .. . I'll have\nto put you in the street if you eat all the time... Do you want me — you —\nto put you in the street ? \"\nHilda forged across vast spaces to the table. Her hands beat against the\nwooden leg that held the top that held the cake she needed. Anna gave her\na piece. It crumbled against Hilda's rosy mouth and fell. Hilda followed to\nthe sight of her feet where the cake lay crumbled. She was satisfied. An oc-\ncasional glance up the table leg where was the table's top and the cake •—\nwhen these crumbs were gone.\nAnna talked with her mouth full of cake and coffee. She was very soft and\ncomfortable in her kitchen : her grey dress was warm like the skin of her cheeks.\n\" You'll be a fatty ! \" she warned. \" There. \" With a fat large shoe\nshe shoved a piece of the cake into Hilda's reach.\nThe door opened.\nAnna thrust her coffee away and jumped up, startled.\n\" Michael! \"\nMichael was not due until late that evening. But still it was he. Solid\nand heavy and sure, he stood in the door.\n\" It's me, \" he announced."}, {"page_pdf": 51, "page_imprimee": "232", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.51", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2339, "texte": "\" What has happened ! \" Anna's mind raced through the catastrophes\nthat his standing there excluded. Her children were alive, Iyouisa slept in her\ncrib, Michael was alive also — not sick, not injured.\n\" They telephoned me . . . when I got to the Barn they give me the message.\nIt's Papa. \"\n\" He's very sick ! \"\n\" Max says for us to come right over, while his alive. I came back.\"\nHe stood there, his cap in a fat hard hand, turning a round face upon\nhis commanding wife. His face was slightly tilted to one side, and his eyes\nmoved from Anna to the floor. Anna knew he was suffering. He was ill\nat ease in suffering. Almost, he was embarrassed. He looked a little as he look-\ned to her when, for a reason connected with his food, he sulked. But he was\nwarmer, more like a child : in his own soul, was softer than when he sulked.\nHer mind worked.\n\" I can get Sophie. We can be back. When do you think ?\n\"In a few hours. Only we go there and see him. I can wait till he dies.\nYou don't have to. \"\nHe blocked the door. She had to take him by the hand, lead him to a chair.\nHis eyes looked diagonally down to the floor about Hilda, inattentive, who\ncried against the imperviousness of table legs upon whose top was cake. So\nhe sat: Anna rang Sophie's bell.\nShe rang it again, again.\nSophie stood before her with swollen eyes as if she had slept. She wore\na dark wrapper. It was open at the front and Anna saw that Sophie was half\ndressed. She had no corsets.\nIt went through her mind that Sophie looked sick — or funny. She\nknew the inconsequence of illness in a woman, when a duty spoke.\n\" Sophie \" she said, \"my man's papa — he's dying — over in Brook-\nlyn. We got to go. I'll be back by supper. Will you come over and take\ncare of Iyouisa? Just for a few hours, Sophie dear. There's milk over the\nstove to give to her —at five I have just nursed her. That's enough. She'll\nsleep most likely all the time. Will you come ? \"\n\" Right away ? \"\n\" Right away. \"\nSophie shut the dim door behind her. They stepped in unison across\nthe hall. The other dim door received them.\nAnna stuffed her body into a coat, found her hat. She changed her slip-\npers to shoes. She had few clothes forgoing out.\n\" I'll take Hilda into the bedroom to be near the baby, \" Sophie thought.\nShe looked long at the man who stood in the hall, fingering his cap, with eyes"}, {"page_pdf": 52, "page_imprimee": "233", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.52", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2833, "texte": "forever diagonally downcast .. . Father of children .. . She said no word\nto him. He bowed, and she said no word, she looked away, seeing hkn still. . .\nfather of children.\nShe was alone .. . behind the other door.\nShe stood a moment, looking where they had left. She felt alone. She\npinned her wrapper high at her throat. She remembered the children with\nwhom she was alone .. . not alone then. —In my own flat alone : not here .. .\nThere with the truth of loneliness she had come not to feel it. Here, where\nthere were many things, many voices, lives, she was not alone, she felt lonely.\nA faint shiver rose from her stomach to her shoulders. She jerked it off\nher ears. She walked into the kitchen. Hilda looked at her, suspended in\nher ceaseless hopeful effort to reach the top of a table where was cake. Sophie\ntook a bit of the cake, placed it firmly in Hilda's palm. She lifted her.\n\" Hold on tight, now, \" she said. She carried her out.\nThrough the hall of the flat she looked to the front room of Mr. Kandro.\nShe noticed that it was far away : she did not think it was strange that it should\nseem so. His door was open. Sunlight was sharp there like a flame burning\non a black stick. It made her know that she had on a wrapper and that she\n■ was not presentable if she should meet him in the hall : she forgot that she had\nmet already Anna's man — and that she could certainly run over to her flat\nand get a dress, and put it on in the Suchy bedroom. Then she was aware of\nhaving come without her key. It was instinct, before she shut her door, to feel,\nthat she had her key. This time she had shut it, not feeling.\nShe went into the bedroom of the Suchys.\nShe forgot key and wrapper. The shade was up, the room breathed quietly.\nA brown light, very full, in the room, was its breath like Anna's breathing\nthat came also full from all her little body.\nSophie closed the door at her back, stood still, holding Hilda in her arms.\nThere was the double-bed, covered with a great patch quilt. The bed was\nquiet and proud : the quilt with its blacks and reds was vibrance making the bed\nmove .. . lifting it, bringing the corners of the room into a sort of wooden\ndance. At the bed's side was a low cot: at its foot the baby slept in her open\ncrib. There was a bureau, littered. There was a rocking chair.\nDominant the bed. Under the arrogant vibrance of its quilt lived depths.\nDepths quiet. Sleep of a man and woman, sleeping and waking together.\nBirth. Still moment before birth — just a moment was it in her long perspec-\ntive — when man gave wholly, shattered, gave himself, the world that was his,\nthe world and its infinite reaches forward and back — and when woman took . . .\nSophie went quietly to the rocker, still holding Hilda, and sat down.\nThe child was hushed. She held her cake in her tight fist. She did not eat\n4"}, {"page_pdf": 53, "page_imprimee": "234", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.53", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2358, "texte": "of it. Her eyes were wide. She held her body upright in the woman's arms.\nShe was hushed.\nSophie faced toward the crib and the bed. She remained . very quiet,\nlong. She arose. She placed Hilda upon the cot. The child lay docilely on\nher back, her eyes still wide. Sophie crossed to the bed's other side. For a\nmoment she peered toward the window. Then she lay down, softly, upon the\nbed. She did not touch the pillows : Her face was flat below them : her body\nwas at an angle. The palms of her hands moved measuredly at her side, up\nand down, rubbing the quilt, as if they sought the quiet deep beneath it.\nHer hands came to rest. She slept.\nHilda's eyes closed also, above her little cot. She slept„ . .\nThe baby awoke . . . and began to cry.\nShe cried low, in measure, as if she were prepared to cry a long time. She\ncried a long time.\nHer voice was a little green vine stringing its way across the brown breath\nof the room. It clambered up into the air : it lay athwart the window : it\ndrooped upon the bed, touching Sophie's hands with its tender shoots. It\ntouched her ears that slept beneath her hair.\nSophie awoke. She saw the room full of the green tracery of the infant's\ncrying.\n\" Yes, yes. \" She sat.\nShe arose. She took Louisa from her crib, smoothing her dresses. She\ntook her to the chair and held her against her bosom and began to rock.\nLouisa cried. Her crying was the small white buds upon the vine.\n\" Yes, yes, \" said Sophie.\nShe held the baby forward in her arms and looked at her. She placed\nher lips on the wet cheeks, on the blinking eyes, on the tousled hair.\n\" Yes, yes\nHolding her to one side, with her right hand she loosed her wrapper. She\nlet fall her left breast free from its scant sheath. Very tenderly, very closely,\nwith eyes far away, she held the baby against it.\nLouisa's crying was red small flowers against the green of her hunger.\n\" Yes, yes, \" Sophie crooned again. She pressed the baby closer. The\ncrying was a flame running fast.\nSophie thrust her forward upon her lap. She lay there, upon her back,\nher fists crumpled, her face tortured : a leaping passion she lay there.\nSophie's hands were very fierce, very swift. She tore the wrapper from her\nshoulders. Down to her waist she rent away her clothes. Her shoulders were\nsharp and white. Her breasts — small, pear-shaped, firm — were the breasts\nof a tall virgin."}, {"page_pdf": 54, "page_imprimee": "235", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.54", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1496, "texte": "Once more she gathered the baby from the torn clothes that lay about her\non her lap, held her close. The nipples stood sheer. She crushed Louisa against\nthem.\nThe infant wailed : Sophie pressed more close. The wail was a shriek.\nSophie had no sense of her self separate from this life upon her.\nShe had no sense of its shriek above the shriek of her flesh. She folded her\narms about the infant and crushed her close, feeling her breasts crush, bruise,\nfeeling her breasts swell out and encase the child and the shriek. She drew her\nhands about her naked shoulders, she pressed with her hands and with her\nthroat, with all her imprisoning self she pressed that had so long pressed-in what\nnow was sweetly escaping. She moved up and down in her chair, pressing,\npressing.\n\" Yes, yes, \" she said. And the child's shriek was over.\n\" Yes, yes.\nIn the silence, she knew that what had been within, so long, so terribly\nwas now outside her. A sagging, a cutting thing within, breaking her back,\nclamping her throat, tugging the flesh of her breasts — now warm, now a being,\nlike a babe, at her breast. And her self flowing upon it, giving it blood and\nmilk.\nShe sat rocking, crooning. The rocking ceased, then the crooning.\nShe sat with wide eyes, wide lips, faintly upturned in a smile . . .\nDarkness came like smoke into the room, fining at last all of it with a black\nstir save the room's center which was still and glowed and was a woman . . .\na half naked woman clasping a child's body.\n\nWaldo Frank"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c017", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c017", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "236", "page_fin": "236", "image_debut": 55, "image_fin": 55, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.16", "titre_corps": "Stars at Tallapoosa", "titre_sommaire": "Stars at Tallapoosa", "signature_source": "Wallace Stevens", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 55, "page_imprimee": "236", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.55", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 933, "texte": "STARS AT TALLAPOOSA\nWallace Stevens\nThe lines are straight and swift between the stars.\nThe night is not the cradle that they cry,\nThe criers, undulating the deep-oceaned phrase.\nThe lines are much too dark and much too sharp.\nThe mind herein attains simplicity.\nThere is no moon, no single, silvered leaf.\nThe body is no body to be seen\nBut is an eye that studies its black lid.\nL,et these be your delight, secretive hunter,\nWading the sea-lines, moist and ever-mingling,\nMounting the earth-lines, long and lax, lethargic.\nThese lines are swift and fall without diverging.\nThe melon-flower nor dew nor web of either\nIs like to these. But in yourself is like :\nA sheaf of brilliant arrows flying straight,\nFlying and falling straightway for their pleasure,\nTheir pleasure that is all bright-edged and cold ;\nOr, if not arrows, then the nimblest motions,\nMaking recoveries of young nakedness\nAnd the lost vehemence the midnights hold."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c018", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c018", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "236", "page_fin": "236", "image_debut": 55, "image_fin": 55, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.17", "titre_corps": "Conversations", "titre_sommaire": "Conversations", "signature_source": "S. Foster Damon", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 55, "page_imprimee": "236", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.55", "debut_caractere": 935, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1332, "texte": "CONVERSATIONS\nIvast night, ghosts of flowers floated\ncolorless, yet still perfect of frail form,\nsea jellies in the night-waters ;\nand with invisible voices they wailed :\n\" Pray for us ! Pray for us ! \"\nAlas ! Iyost flowers, why should ye ask\nfor the prayers of a man ?\n\" That we may rise to be men, fool \\\" they answered.\nBut I prayed instead the impossible prayer\nthat men should become flowers."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c019", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c019", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "237", "page_fin": "237", "image_debut": 56, "image_fin": 56, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.18", "titre_corps": "Voyage", "titre_sommaire": "Voyage", "signature_source": "S. Foster Damon", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 56, "page_imprimee": "237", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.56", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 379, "texte": "VOYAGE\nS. Foster Damon\nIt is an indisputable fact\nthat the load of grotesque humans\nin this awkward ship\nis moving directly toward\nthe glory of the rising moon.\nIt is not so indisputable\nthat they shall never reach it.\nFor I can see them,\nstrained through the sieve of many generations,\nsetting forth from the silver rim of the moon\nin an irradiant galleon\ntoward the sun itself."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c020", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c020", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "237", "page_fin": "237", "image_debut": 56, "image_fin": 56, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.19", "titre_corps": "All Is One", "titre_sommaire": "All Is One", "signature_source": "Martin Armstrong", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 56, "page_imprimee": "237", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.56", "debut_caractere": 381, "fin_caractere_exclue": 901, "texte": "ALL IS ONE\nMartin Armstrong\nI hear the flowing of great rivers\nAnd the long slow breathing of the wind,\nAnd solemnly, unceasingly,\nL,ike gleaming fish\nIn weeds beneath dim water,\nStars on their universal way\nGlide among woven boughs.\nAll is one,\nSurely, indivisibly.\nA falling pebble\nRuffles the pool's clear face,\nAnd in those wavering circles waken\nPowers that shall change the motion of Orion\nAnd vex the dreaming of a thousand stars.\nDeeds are immortal,\nOnce the rose is gathered,\nNothing can ever be.the same again."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c021", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c021", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "238", "page_fin": "239", "image_debut": 57, "image_fin": 58, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.20", "titre_corps": "The Apollo Of Veii", "titre_sommaire": "The Apollo Of Veii", "signature_source": "Edward Storer", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 57, "page_imprimee": "238", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.57", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2744, "texte": "THE APOLLO OF VEII\n\nOn the 19th May 1916, in the middle of the great war, a new Apollo was\nbrought to light by the excavators of the Italian government at Veio, the an-\ncient Veii of the Etruscans. Although the professor superintending the work ~\nknew that his discovery was of prime importance, not only archaeologically but\nalso artistically, the discovery remained the secret of a few persons until 1920.\nThen the director of the Etruscan Museum in Rome gave photographs and partic-\nulars to the Italian press, and the new Apollo caused a momentary flutter of\nexcitement among those interested in antique art. The statue in question forms\npart of a group representing the myth of Apollo fighting with Hercules for a\nhind in the presence of two other divinities, one of whom can be recognized as\nMercury. Another is probably Diana, but this portion of the group of statuary,\nwhich probably formed part of the decoration of a temple, is ruined. The subject\nis often repeated in ancient art, and there is a notable example of the struggle of\nApollo with Hercules, on a bronze helmet in Paris.\nThat the statues in question, and especially the Apollo which is reproduced\nin this number of Broom are of considerable importance will reveal itself at a\nglance. These reproductions of the sculpture of the unknown Etruscan artist\nhave not so far appeared — as far as we know — in any illustrated periodical out\nof Italy. The statues are not even yet shown to the general public at the\nEtruscan museum at the Villa Giulia in Rome.\nThe style of the statues is lonic-Etruscan of the end of the vith or the be-\nginning of the vth century B. C. Professor Giglioli of the Etruscan museum gives\nthe date of the Veii Apollo as 500 B. C. The work is in terra cotta and has had\nto be considerably restored. The Apollo is covered with a coating of polished\nclay, which, as with many ancient terra cottas, has a yellowish color. The nude\nparts of the body are painted that brownish- red [which characterizes male fig-\nures in archaic sculpture. The statue was all of a piece, and made of clay about\nan inch and a quarter thick, and was baked entire, for which purpose holes were\nleft in the plinth and the shoulders.\nBut the archaeological details do not concern us here so much as the artistic\ninterest of the life-size god. The pose of the advancing figure, the tremendous\nforce of the head and face, the curious malignity in the mask-like countenance add\nsomething fresh to our conception of this deity, wrought and rewrought in al-\nmost every kind of plastic material by the artists of Asia and Europe.\nThe statue raises for us once again the perplexing riddle: who were the Etrus-\ncans ? The unknown Veian artist has contrived to give to the Sun god a touch"}, {"page_pdf": 58, "page_imprimee": "239", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.58", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2774, "texte": "of that Sphinx-like character which is responsible for the charm of Etruscology,\nthat fascination which led the old Englishman Dennis to spend years travelling\nabout alone in the 'eighteen-forties through the forgotten and buried cities of the\npeople that gave her earliest arts to Rome.\nHow different is the conception of the lonic-Etruscan or Italo-Etruscan\nartist, author of the Veii Apollo from that even of the primitive Greeks. Without\ngoing into the technical details, which demonstrate a decadence of the pure archaic\nstyle, we find this example of Etruscan art has something of its own. In the\nexpression of the face, there is something sinister and cruel, dark and hermetic.\nFar indeed is it removed from the sunny tragicness of the Greek art of the per-\nfect period.\nIt has the strangeness of the names of the strange gods of Etruria, as Tages\n\" a wondrous boy with a hoary head and the wisdom of age who sprang from the\nfresh ploughed furrows of Tarquinii \", or dark Typhoon with his mallet, the Sa-\ntanic deity, or Phuphlums, a grimmer Bacchus.\nEtruscan art is mostly known to the general cultured public by those later\nexamples of it when it merges into Etrusco-Roman art, as in those monstrously\nsmug funeral statues that we see on tombs and cinerary monuments. Even here\nsomething of the sensual divinity which characterizes the expression of works like\nthe Veii Apollo and the Veii Mercury remains. It persists, indeed, diluted, in\nItalian art of much later epochs.\nThat modern sculpture has points of contact with the antique art is self\nevident. What is interesting to note is how close sometimes these points of\nrelation may be. The preoccupation of modern sculptors with pure form has\nits analogy in the works of the ancients, where what is known in art jargon as\nplastic import or significant form occupied consciously or unconsciously the\nold time sculptors to a considerable extent. And probably, much more con-\nsciously than is generally supposed.\nThis form would seem to be the chief obsession of the modern artist. The\nvivifying spiritual influence he must find in himself. What does the modern ar-\ntist accept whole-heartedly as his motive faith shall we say ? Christianity ?\nNo. Paganism ? It can only be a charming affectation. A kind of sublimated\nmathematics, the divinity of geometrical ratiocination ? Maybe, in part. Util-\nity ? To an extent, yes, but it is a drab creed, without cross or laurel. The\nartist usually supplies his own faith, which can be but little else than faith in\nhimself, an egocentric religion, whose ideality will rarely bear searching analysis.\nAnd if the modern and the ancient artist sometimes meet in the cerebral\nsympathies of form, in this matter of faith or spiritual impulse they are far apart.\n\nEdward Storer"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c022", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c022", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "240", "page_fin": "240", "image_debut": 59, "image_fin": 59, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.21", "titre_corps": "The Apollo Of Veii", "titre_sommaire": "The Apollo Of Veii", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 59, "page_imprimee": "240", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.59", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 18, "texte": "The Apollo of Veii"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c023", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c023", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "241", "page_fin": "241", "image_debut": 60, "image_fin": 60, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.22", "titre_corps": "Head From Etruscan Tomb Fresco", "titre_sommaire": "Head From Etruscan Tomb Fresco", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 60, "page_imprimee": "241", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.60", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 30, "texte": "Head from Etruscan Tomb Fresco"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c024", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c024", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "242", "page_fin": "246", "image_debut": 61, "image_fin": 65, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.23", "titre_corps": "If You Had Three Husbands", "titre_sommaire": "If You Had Three Husbands", "signature_source": "Gertrude Stein", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 61, "page_imprimee": "242", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.61", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1161, "texte": "IF YOU HAD THREE HUSBANDS\nPresent Homes\n\nThere then.\n«*»\nPresent ten.\nMother and sister apples, no not apples, they can't be apples, everything\ncan't be apples, sounds can't be apples. Do be quiet and refrain from accept-\nances.\nIt was a great disappointment to me.\nI can see that here is a balcony. There never was a sea or land, there\nnever was a harbor or a snow storm, there never was excitement. Some said\nshe couldn't love. I don't believe that anybody said that. I don't mean\nthat anybody said that. We were all present . We could be devoted. It\ndoes make a different thing. And hair, hair should not be deceiving. Cause\ntears. Why tears, why not abscesses.\nI will never mention an ugly skirt.\nIt pleased me to say that I was pretty.\nOh we are so pleased.\nI don't say this at all.\nConsequences are not frightful.\nPleasure in a home.\nAfter lunch, why after lunch, no birds are eaten. Of course carving is\nspecial.\nI don't say that for candor.\nPlease be prepared to stay.\nI don't care for wishes.\nThis is not a success.\nBy this stream.\nStreaming out.\nI am relieved from draught. This is not the way to spell water.\nI cannot believe in much.\nI have courage."}, {"page_pdf": 62, "page_imprimee": "243", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.62", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 738, "texte": "Endurance.\nAnd restraint.\nAfter that.\nFor the end.\nThis is the title of a conclusion which was not anticipated.\nWhen I was last there I smiled behind the car. What car showed it.\nBy that time.\nBelieve her out.\nOut where.\nBy that.\nBuy that.\nShe pleased me for .. . Eye saw.\nDo it.\nFor that over that.\nWe passed away. By that time servants were memorable. They came\nto praise.\nPlease do not.\nA blemish.\nThey have spans.\nI cannot consider that the right word.\nBy the time we are selfish, by that time we are selfish.\nBy that time we are selfish.\nIt is a wonderful sight,\nIt is a wonderful sight to see.\nDays.\nWhat are days.\nThey have hams.\nDelicate.\nDelicate hams.\nPounds,\nPounds where.\nPounds of.\nWhere.\nNot 'butter dogs.\nI establish souls."}, {"page_pdf": 63, "page_imprimee": "244", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.63", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 917, "texte": "Any spelling will do.\nIf you look at it.\nThat way.\nI am going on.\nIn again.\nI am going on again in in them.\nWhat I feel.\nWhat I do feel.\nThey said mirrors.\nUndoubtedly they have that phrase.\nI can see a hat.\nI remember very well knowing largely.\nAny shade, by that Ido mean iron glass. Iron glass is so torn. By\nwhat. By the glare. Be that beside. Size shall be sensible. That size shall\nbe sensible.\nFixing.\nFixing enough.\nFixing up.\nBy fixing down, that is softness, by fixing down there.\nTheir end.\nPoliteness.\nNot by linen.\nI don't wish to be recalled.\nOne, day, I do not wish to use the word, one day they asked to buy that.\nI don't mean anything by threads. It was wholly unnecessary to do so.\nIt was done and then a gun. By that stand. Wishes.\nI do not see what I have to do with that.\nAny one can help weeping.\nBy wise.\nI am so indifferent.\nNot a bite.\nCall me handsome.\nIt was a nice fate.\nAny one could see."}, {"page_pdf": 64, "page_imprimee": "245", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.64", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 989, "texte": "Any one could see.\nAny one could see.\nBuy that etching.\nDo be black.\nI do not mean to say etching. Why should I be very sensitive. Why\nshould I matter. Why need I be seen. Why not have politeness.\nWhy not have politeness.\nIn my hair.\nI don't think it sounds at all like that.\nTheir end.\nTo end.\nTo be for that end.\nI don't see what difference it makes.\nIt does matter.\nWhy have they pots.\nOrnaments.\nAnd china.\nIt isn't at all.\nI have made every mistake. '\nPowder it.\nNot put into boxes.\nNot put into boxes.\nPowder it.\nI know that well.\nShe mentioned it as she was sleeping.\nShe liked bought cake best. No she didn't for that purpose.\nI have utter confusion.\nNo two can be alike.\nThey are and they are not stubborn.\nPlease me.\nI was mistaken.\nAny way.\nBy that.\nDo not refuse to be wild.\nDo not refuse to be all.\nWe have decided not to withstand it.\nWe would rather not have the home.\nThis is not to teach lessons of exchange endurance and resemblance and\nby that time it was turned.\nShout."}, {"page_pdf": 65, "page_imprimee": "246", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.65", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 709, "texte": "By.\nOut.\nI am going to continue humming.\nThis does not mean express wishes.\nI am not so fanciful. I am beside that calculated to believe in whole\npages. Oh do not annoy me.\nDays.\nI don't like to be fitted. She didn't say that.\nIf it hadn't been as natural as all the rest you would have been as silly\nas all the rest.\nIt's not at all when it is right.\nI wish for a cake.\nShe said she did.\nShe said she didn't.\nGloom.\nThere was no gloom.\nEvery room.\nThere was no room.\nThere was no room.\nBuy that chance.\nShe didn't leave me any money.\nHead.\nAhead.\nI don't want to be visible or invisible.\nI don't want a dog named Dick.\nIt has nothing to do with it.\nI am obliged to end.\nIntend.\nMy uncle will.\n\nGertrude Stein"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c025", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c025", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "247", "page_fin": "247", "image_debut": 66, "image_fin": 66, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.24", "titre_corps": "Waste", "titre_sommaire": "Waste", "signature_source": "Lola Ridge", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 66, "page_imprimee": "247", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.66", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 465, "texte": "WASTE\nLola Ridge\nDawn is like a broken honeycomb\nSpilling over the waxen edges of the clouds\nThat drip with light.\nSpires, swarming up the mauve mist,\nReach their rosy tips\nLike little pointed tongues\nFirst about a shining platter,\nAnd every window is a brazier\nThat cups the living gold.\nEven the squat chimneys\nRooting heaven\nCatch the sun upon their snouts\nAnd keep it balancing ...\nOnly my heart,\nIyikeTa splintered vase,\nIs envious of the light\nIt cannot hold."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c026", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c026", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "248", "page_fin": "248", "image_debut": 67, "image_fin": 67, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.25", "titre_corps": "Gold", "titre_sommaire": "Gold", "signature_source": "Edward Storer", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 67, "page_imprimee": "248", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.67", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 302, "texte": "GOLD\nI let the rich gold sunlight\nbind itself round me,\ninfinitely fine\nwrappings of gold,\ntill I grew blind and\nmy heart seemed to stop,\nand I thought myself\nsome Eastern emperor,\nswathed in leaf of gold,\nupright within the tomb\nof his great ancestors,\ndeep in cobalt caverns hewn\nin the savage earth."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c027", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c027", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "248", "page_fin": "248", "image_debut": 67, "image_fin": 67, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.26", "titre_corps": "Broken Image", "titre_sommaire": "Broken Image", "signature_source": "Edward Storer", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 67, "page_imprimee": "248", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.67", "debut_caractere": 304, "fin_caractere_exclue": 458, "texte": "BROKEN IMAGE\nIyike the tide\nwhen it falls back\nleaving upon the shore\ndelicate seaweeds and\nwatery fantasies dead,\nso in the heart\nlove when it goes . . ."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c028", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c028", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "249", "page_fin": "249", "image_debut": 68, "image_fin": 68, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.27", "titre_corps": "By The Shore", "titre_sommaire": "By The Shore", "signature_source": "Edward Storer", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 68, "page_imprimee": "249", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.68", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 206, "texte": "BY THE SHORE\nFlowers flaming by the seashore,\ncrimson flowers,\nshuddering in the breeze\nas if the violent sea,\nwith its white fangs\nhad wounded earth,\nand the blood dripped\nperfumedly\no'er the salty stones."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c029", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c029", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "249", "page_fin": "249", "image_debut": 68, "image_fin": 68, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.28", "titre_corps": "Dreams", "titre_sommaire": "Dreams", "signature_source": "Edward Storer", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 68, "page_imprimee": "249", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.68", "debut_caractere": 208, "fin_caractere_exclue": 344, "texte": "DREAMS\nPoppies in the corn,\nlike dreams among reality,\nwhere man to live,\nthe white bread must savour\nwith rosy dreams,\ndelicate dreams."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c030", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c030", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "249", "page_fin": "249", "image_debut": 68, "image_fin": 68, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.29", "titre_corps": "Illusion", "titre_sommaire": "Illusion", "signature_source": "Edward Storer", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 68, "page_imprimee": "249", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.68", "debut_caractere": 346, "fin_caractere_exclue": 496, "texte": "ILLUSION\nEdward Storer\nWhere the moon's image lay\npalely printed on water,\na summer moth\nlay dying happily . . .\nshe thought she died upon the moon.\n5"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c031", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c031", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "250", "page_fin": "260", "image_debut": 69, "image_fin": 79, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.30", "titre_corps": "The Limbo Of American Literature", "titre_sommaire": "The Limbo Of American Literature", "signature_source": "Gorham B. Munson", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 69, "page_imprimee": "250", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.69", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2255, "texte": "THE LIMBO OF AMERICAN LITERATURE\n\nI.\nCritics are the conscience of a literature. When we speak of the <112 artistic\nconscience \" of a writer, we mean his power of self-criticism. Hence, the above\ndictum is simply a logical extension of the term, \" artistic conscience.\"\nWith the reminder that dated periods in literature are arbitrary and over-\nlapping, I would make an 1860-1910 period in American literature which\nmight be called the Neo-Colonial or the Neo-Puritanic Era. It starts approx-\nimately with the death of the New England School and terminates roughly\nwith the rise of the present. Young America into prominence.\nDuring these fifty years American literature was either without a conscience,\nor with a diseased conscience, or, at the best, with only a very feeble right-\neous conscience. During this time the adventures of a vigorous plutocracy\nand the servitudes exacted by it, sapped the energies of America; the middle\nclass moralists planted all their stodgy weight upon the creative spirit; Vic-\ntorian England filled up the entire intellectual and literary horizon. The\nrespectable morally-minded business-serving professor-preacher, e.g., Ha-\nmilton Wright Mabie, was an unchallenged blight and a White Iyist of books\nwas an imperial decree issued with divine sanction. Percival Pollard, Walter\nBlackburn Harte, a few others were desperate enough to protest in the name\nof literary art, but how far did their voices, choked up in magazines of weak\nprestige, carry into the American consciousness ? At no time between the Civil\nWar and 1910 was there a sizable corps of critical spirits in love with aesthetic\nform to war brilliantly for the emergence of a national literature embodying\nthe realities of human experience in America. looking back now, we per-\nceive two results of this deficiency.\nThe first affects our three literary men of admitted genius in that period\n— Walt Whitman, Henry James, Mark Twain. The wreckage of Mark Twain's\ngreat gift in that conscienceless era has lately been ably demonstrated. What\nhappened to the other two who fulfilled in a high degree the natural urge of\ntheir genius was a very thorough failure to achieve any immediate wide-\nspread contact with the minds and actions of their countrymen. Henry"}, {"page_pdf": 70, "page_imprimee": "251", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.70", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2969, "texte": "James has influenced two creditable novelists in America, but compare this\nwith the much larger following he has inspired in England. He took the art\nof novel-writing with the greatest seriousness, a preoccupation so offensive\nto most Americans that his expatriation was used to steer him away from our\nattention. - So well has the charge of un-Americanism been pressed against\nJames that today it surprises us to hear young Englishmen rendering tribute\nto \" your novelist/' to\"the American, Henry James.\" This matter may\nperhaps be seen in all its absurdity if we recall Turgenev in exile at Paris\nand under the influence of Flaubert, writing novels in which the Russian\ntravelling outside his native land was often the principal figure just as the Amer-\nican in Europe was a favorite figure for James. But where is the Russian\nwho seriously contends that Turgenev belongs not to- Russian but to French\nliterature ? Walt Whitman at least was indubitably an indigenous poet, but\nfor long the bulk of his acclaim came from Europe. It was not until the\nlast decade, when a species of Whitman Renaissance sprang up, that he could\nbe said to have fermented the American mass in any recognizable degree.\nThis slowness in making contact I blame directly upon the absence of alert\nintelligent critics capable of utilizing the wonderful springboards Mark Twain,\nHenry James and Walt Whitman presented, and for proof of this contention\nI point again to Russian literature. Here we find contemporaneous with\nthe great Russian poets and novelists extremely able critics writing in powerful\nreviews who promptly expounded and praised the works of the former. The\nhuge sales of Pushkin, lyermontov, Turgenev, Dostoyevsky, Tolstoy, Gorki,\ntheir almost instant penetration into the intellectual and emotional life of Russia\nare acknowledged by historians of Russian literature to be appreciably due\nto the brilliant pens of the critics Byelinsky, Tchernyshevsky, Dubrolubov,\nPisarev and Michailovsky. These were men of a stature sorely needed in the\nranks of American critics from iB6O to 1910.\nThe other results was the creation of a cloudy limbo to which the pro-\nfessor-preachers consigned whatever original and vital talent intruded within\ntheir range of reading. Only a few swam free and received the plaudits of\nthe pundits, and these perhaps owed their reception to extra-literary causes.\nWilliam Dean Ho wells, for instance, was nominated as our foremost novelist,\nnot so much for his sustained control of good prose, as for his adoption of a\nsuave undisturbing selected realism. On the other hand, into the limbo went\na truly fascinating crew of doughty uncompromisers with art and life. A\npartial list includes Frank Norris, Ambrose Bierce, Stephen Crane, Iyafcadio\nHearn, Percival Pollard, Walter Blackburn Harte, Michael Monahan, Sada-\nkichi Hartmann, Edgar Saltus and William Vaughn James Huneker\nthey could not keep there. His enthusiastic personality came storming out,"}, {"page_pdf": 71, "page_imprimee": "252", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.71", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2799, "texte": "and even vaulted into the National Institute of Arts and Letters. Part of\nthe literary reconstruction in Anierica has been the pulling out from this limbo\nof the powerful novelist Norris, of the mordant Bierce, of the subtle prose\nartist Hearn, and thanks to the efforts of Joseph Conrad and Ford Madox\nHueffer, of Stephen Crane, whose barbarically beautiful \" Red Badge of Cour-\nage \" and whose \" The Black Riders and Other Lines, \" anticipatory by fifteen\nor twenty years of the vogue of vers libre in this country, probably hold a\nposition of much less prestige than the works of James Lane Allen in the rank-\ning lists of our reading public. Pollard and Harte have been recently discussed\nin print : Pollard's \" Their Day in Court \" will for long be an invaluable source-\nbook for the literary history of this period. Harte and Monahan and Sada-\nkichi Hartmann will probably always remain in the limbo and be discovered\nonly by the curious from time to time. Their talents lack momentum,\nbut let us honor them for their level heads and true eyes and gallant\nspirits which, in a time of most confused provincialism, chose and fought\non the intelligent side. Hartmann was early in the field for Walt Whitman,\nWhistler, Swinburne, Verlaine and Mallarme : he is a delightfully picturesque\nvagrom, but unfortunately he writes broken English, Monahan is a shrewd\nlover of books and writes with charm, geniality and insight. If he had devel-\noped a more personal idiom, and if he had placed more objectivity in his sub-\njective essays, he might have had a chance for survival. These men should\nhave been powers in the criticism of their day, but the times were against\nthem. There were no giant critics to whom they might have allied themselves\nin a profitable warfare, nor was there any access to an adequate circulation\nfor their thoughts.\nIn what plight they were may be visualized if we throw back twenty-five\nor thirty-five years a novelist like Sherwood Arderson. Anderson, emerging\nin the last decade, has found good publishers and influential magazines open\nto him. He has captured a reading public and received understanding and\npraise from a large number of important critics. The contemporary American\nnovel cannot be treated without considering his creation. But a few years\nback and how complete!} 7 his appearance might have been smothered. Con-\ndemned to tiny magazines, printed by small publishers, perhaps even forced\nto publish at his own expense, blackballed by the hordes of professor-preacher\nreviewers, he too would probably have disappeared into the limbo for decades.\nHis ability would have prevented such a fate, you say. Well, look up the\nstory of Ambrose Bierce again.\nEdgar Saltus 1 and William Vaughn Moody will be treated in more detail.\n1 Bdgar Saltus died July 31, 1921,"}, {"page_pdf": 72, "page_imprimee": "253", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.72", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2521, "texte": "5*\n\nII.\nDon't be frightened away from Saltus by President Harding's startling\npredilection for \" The Imperial Purple.\" Against such approbation set Hun-\neker's worded remark that Saltus was a \" pet author \" of his, Wilde's\n\" In Edgar Saltus's work passion struggles with grammar on every page, \" Ar-\nthur Symons g It seems to me that; Kdgar Saltus is an American wiiter al-\ntogether too little read, glow over \" The Imperial Purple/' and\nCarl Van Vechten's excellent chapter on Saltus.f The elite, then, have discussed\nhim far more than the canaille.\nStyle is a synonym for Saltus. Put this passage descriptive of the\" suicide\nof Lenox in \" Mr. Incoul's Misadventure \" through the laboratory\ntests.\n\" Then he took from the package a phial that held a brown liquid, in which\nhe detected a shade like to that of gold. The odor was dull and heavy. He\nput the phial down and stood for a moment irresolute. He had looked into the\nfuture. But in its Arcadias he saw nothing, save his own image suspended\nfrom a gibbet. He looked again almost wistfully • no, there was nothing.\nHe threw off his coat and rolled up his sleeve. From the phial he filled the\nsyringe, and with the point pricked the bare arm and sent the liquid spurting\ninto the flesh. Three times he did this. He reached for the absinthe and left\nit untasted.\n\" Into his veins had come an unknown, a delicious languor. He sank\ninto a chair. The walls of the room dissolved into cataracts of light and daz-\nzling steel. The flooring changed to crimson, and from that to black, and\nback to red again. From the ceiling came flood after flood of fused, intermin-\ngled and oscillating colors. His eyes closed. The light became more intense,\nand burned luminous through the lids. In his ears filtered a harmony, faint as\ndid it come fiom afar, and singular as were it won from some new consonance\nof citherns and clavichords, and suddenly it rose into tumultuous vibrations,\nstriated with series of ascending scales. Then as suddenly ceased, drowned\nin claps of thunder.\n\" The lights turned purple and glowed less vividly, as thongh tough veils\nwere being lowered between him and them. But still the languour continued,\nsweeter ever and more enveloping, till from very sweetness it was almost\npain.\n\" The room grew darker, the colors waned, the lights behind the falling\nveils sank dim, and dimmer, fading, one by one \\ a single spark lingered, it\nwavered a moment, and vanished into night.\"\nThis passage is not one of Saltus s most purple ! it lies level, however, with"}, {"page_pdf": 73, "page_imprimee": "254", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.73", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2644, "texte": "the bulk of his writing. Some of his early books are composed in a concise\nchaste diction of remarkable clarity : a few of the later works exhibit an as-\ntonishing style-suicide. The Syren-lure of words, the splendors within reach\nof his pen made Saltus delirious for a short period and the vitals of his prose,\nclarity, were ornamented into intoxicating but incomprehensible obscurity.\nSwinburne's fault committed in prose. \" A prose paranoiac,\" said Pollard. But\nthe last books show that Saltus again caught control of his glittering instru-\nment.\nNo other American writer cultivates sensuous appeals so much as Saltus.\nBehind the majority of his sentences Lesbian lutes play; from them perfumes\nrise, out of them colors stare or flash. His pages are stained with ochres\nand indigoes and jets. He actually compels the reader to caress delicately,\ntaste sybaritically, inhale observingly, listen carefully and see vividly what\nhe writes.\nThe rhythm of Saltus is a swift staccato intoned with a very sensitive\nfeeling for word inversions. He is a master of the short sentence, as difficult\na mastery as that of rhythmically and clearly manipulating long sentences.\nHe has a fertile gift for striking metaphor and simile. \" \" The item hung\na hammock for her thoughts, rested her mentally, unrolled a carpet for the\nreturning steps of health. \" 11 whips in his word, he added . Of Ivan\nthe Terrible, \" A cholera, corpses mounted about him.\" \" Her fingers rippled\nover the keys like rain.\" \" When she laughed one could see her tongue ; it\nwas like an innner cut of water-melon. Such as these aie as plentiful in Sal\ntus*s pages as precious stones in El Dorado.\nSaltus can report expertly the conversation of the haut monde (alas,\nthe brilliant repartee of the haut monde nowadays at least comes only from the\nclever author's brain). From \" The Monster \" I take the following conversa-\ntion, casting it into stage dialog form, between the young daredevil Aurelia\nand her stupid fiance Buttercups, nicknamed Parsnips.\nFootman : Will mademoiselle give herself the trouble to pass into the salon ?\nAurelia : No, I like it here. Besides I hate suggestions. Tell Madame\nBarouffska that I have come on a most unimportant matter which will pro-\nbably detain me a very long time.\nButtercups : Yes, I often think that it is only unimportant matters that\nare really momentous. What is this one, if I may ask ?\nAurelia : I have forgotten.\nButtercups : Perhaps then it was really important.\nAurelia : So it was ! So it was ! I remember now I wanted to ask her\nhow she likes matrimony.\nButtercups : Caesar ! You are not collecting data on the subject, are you i"}, {"page_pdf": 74, "page_imprimee": "255", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.74", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2066, "texte": "Aureua (treacherously innocent) : You wouldn't wish me to take leaps\nin the dark, would you ?\nButtercups : Certainly I would. Certainly I do — since you are to\ntake them with me.\nAureua [same wicked look) : What a beautiful nature you have !\nButtercups : I'll tell you what matrimony is, two souls with but a single\nthought.\nAureua : Yes. Two souls with half a thought apiece. There is real\nbliss !\nButtercups (snarling) :Oh come, now! If you turn everything into\nridicule.\nAureua [dreamily) : I asked the duchess, and she said.\nButtercups : The old harridan !\nAureua : You know her manner. (imitating her.) My dear, matrimony\nis three months of adoration, three months of introspection, thirty years of\ntoleration — with the children to begin it all over.\nButtercups [frowning) : A rather voluminous definition.\nAureua : Rather luminous I should call it.\nButtercups : While you were at it, it's a pity you did not ask her what\nlove is.\nAureua : Parsnips ! You'll never believe it ! She asked me !\nButtercups [glowering): Mistook you for an expert. What did you say ?\nAureua : I said, that while from studies and statistics I was inclined\nto believe that, theoretically, love is a fermentation of the molecules of the ima-\ngination, actually it is the affection of somebody else.\nButtercups : I don't understand that.\nAureua : I added that from the same studies and statistics I was also\ninclined to believe that love is the tragedy of those who lack it, the boredom\nthose who don't.\nButtercups: Eh? I don't understand that either.\nAureua : I further stated that love is a specific emotion, more or less\nexclusive in selection, more — or less — permanent in duration and due\nto a mental disturbance, in itself caused by a law of attraction which some-\nbody or other said was the myth of happiness, invented by the devil for men's\ndespair.\nButtercups [groaning) : I don't understand that at all.\nAureua : Violet said she didn't either.\nButtercups : Now there's a woman of sense.\nAureua : Xyeilah Baouffska said she did understand, so I may suppose\nthat she is stupid."}, {"page_pdf": 75, "page_imprimee": "256", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.75", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2858, "texte": "Buttercups: No doubt, she does seem to have made a mess of things.\nWhy now did she leave her first husband ?\nAurEUA : It is not a thing I could mention.\nButtercups : What ?\nAurEUA (;perversely) : She caught him in the act, [Appearing to blush.)\nWith her own eyes she saw him eating fish with his knife.\nSurely, this dialog with its wit and epigrammatic quality can be read\nin the same evening with Congreve or Wilde.\nSaltus's diction, then, has clarity, brilliant figures, sensuous appeal, rhythm,\npersonal accent and wit. With this sharp, polished, jewel-encrusted dagger\nhe carved out thirty odd books whose range from translation through fiction,\nliterary criticism and historical panoramas to philosophy proclaims the author\na versatile talent in possession of a well-digested general culture.\nIn his short stories and novels Saltus uses mechanized plots and mechan-\nized characters with ingenious variations. Stripped of all but a synoptic\nverbiage, his stories appeal to the same naivete in us which makes \" mystery \"\nor detective stories so popular. Iyike the latter, \" The Truth about Tristrem\nVaiick \" or \" The Paliser Case \" utilized the lassoo of suspense to pull us to\nthe finis. Like them, Saltus offers little psychological dissection, none of the\nthrobbing immensities of life, no third dimension of art as we are tugged along.\nBut his entertainment is vastly better. He adorns our suspense with sulphur-\nous language, he nearly drains off the cruelty and perversity in us, he never\nrepeats himself as a virtuoso of the shudder. He is a Petronius in his percep-\ntion of the art of suicide, a Wainwright in the aesthetic employment of crime —\nin sum, a Grand Marshal of the Pomps of Satan. He takes very few and then\nvery brief philosophical excursions in his fiction, but his attitude towards the\nuniverse has been profoundly acquired and its presence in the author, although\napparently excluded from his fiction, does give added weight to his wiry struc-\ntures. Saltus is saturated with Hindoo philosophy and is a thorough disciple\nof Schopenhauer and Hartmann. In \" The Philosophy of Disenchantment \"\nand \" The Anatomy of Negation \" he has written two compact readable and\nscholarly resumes of pessimism and of skepticism — perhaps the best hand-\nbooks ever published on these subjects. I quote the final paragraphs of \" The\nAnatomy of Negation \" in order to indicate clearly the philosophical position\nof the mind which devises such delightful fiction.\n\" There is no help there, nor is there any elsewhere. The Orient is asleep\nin the ashes of her gods. The star of Ormuzd has burned out in the skies. On\nthe banks of her sacred seas, Greece, hushed for evermore, rests on the divine\nlimbs of her white immortals. In the sepulchre of the pale Nazarene, humanity\nguards its last divinity. Every promise is unfulfilled. There is no light save"}, {"page_pdf": 76, "page_imprimee": "257", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.76", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2954, "texte": "perchance in death. One torture more, one more throb of the heart, and after\nit nothing. The grave opens, a little flesh falls in, and the weeds of forgetful-\nness which soon hide the tomb grow eternally above its vanities. And still\nthe voice of the living, of the just and of the unjust, of kings, of felons and of\nbeasts, will be raised unsilenced, until humanity, unsatisfied as before and yet\nimpatient for the peace which life has disturbed, is tossed at last, with its shat-\ntered globe and forgotten gods, to fertilize the furrows of where worlds\nferment.\n\"On this vista the curtain may be drawn. Neither poet nor seer can\nlook beyond. Nature, who is unconscious in her immorality, entrancing in\nher beauty, savage in her cruelty, imperial in her prodigality, and appalling\nin her convulsions, is not only deaf, but dumb. There is no answer to any\nappeal. The best we can do, the best that has ever been done, is to recognize\nthe implacability of the laws that rule the universe, and contemplate as calmly\nas we can the nothingness from which we are come and into which we shall\nall disappear. The one consolation we hold, though it is one which may be\nillusory too, consists in the belief that when death comes, fear and hope are\nat an end. Then wonder ceases ; the insoluble no longer perplexes ; space is\nlost ; the infinite is blank ; the farce is done.\"\nSuch a vision of the universe requires a drastic escape. Schopenhauer\nrecommended compassion, others have countered with irony. Saltus says :\nFirst, health ; second, indifference. His pessimism permeates him, his indif-\nference cloaks him — almost. His preoccupation with cruelty, with the ten-\nsions of mental agonies, with the bloody nightmares of history lifts one corner\nof the cloak and the question occurs : Is Edgar Saltus a sadistic artist, is his\npessimism fed by a furtive delight in the spectacle of mankind's sufferings ?\nCertainly, the spectacular cinematographic histories he has written of the\nCaesars and the Tsars were congenial tasks. His fiction may remain second-\nhand book-stall quarry for the curious but the \" Imperial Purple \" and \" The\nImperial Orgy \" should last as long as \" The Philosophy of Disenchantment \"\nand \" The Anatomy of Negation : \" the former two definitively capture the\ntheatrical qualities of the corrupt Roman and Russian lineages in a scintillat-\ning prose. Not the least wonder about Saltus is his consummate ability to\nreduce whole libraries of yawns into two hundred pages of compact excitement.\nAt the age of eighteen Saltus wrote a monograph on Balzac, the value\nof which is not wholly spoiled by his acceptance of the Balzac legend in toto.\nIndeed, the searchlight had not lit up so relentlessly then as it has\nsince the soft spots -in the legend. In 1917, a subscription printer brought\nout \" Oscar Wilde : An Idler's Impression,\" a brochure which establishes\nSaltus's ability to write with charm and discrimination on other authors. He"}, {"page_pdf": 77, "page_imprimee": "258", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.77", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2952, "texte": "includes intimate gossip, stores up some interesting anecdotes and renders an\nexcellent tribute to Wilde.\nBecause of the scarcity of this book, I leave criticism momentarily to quote\nan anecdote. Saltus had been invited to Tite Street for dinner. Upon his\narrival, he was surprised to find no other guests and the house apparently\nunfestive. Wilde met him in the drawing-room and drawled : \" This is delightful\nof you. I have been late for dinner a half hour, again a whole hour. You\nare late an entire week. That is what I call originality.\" Saltus responded with\nan invitation to dine with him. Oscar remarked on accepting : \" I have the\nsimplest tastes. lam always satisfied with the best.\" Interesting also is Saltus's\nestimate of O. W. \" Wilde was a third rate poet who occasionally rose to the se-\ncond class but not once to the first. Prose is more difficult than verse and in\nit he is rather sloppy... In talk he blinded, and it is the subsiding wonder of\nit that his plays contain. \"\nReturning to an estimate of Saltus, let us sum up by saying we have in\nhim a temperament saturated with pessimism which expresses itself by the\nbeautiful decoration of sinister themes. To see grandeurs in vast horrors is\nthe last thing a commonplace person can do. Neither can commonplace\npersons accumulate effortlessly a legend about themselves. This Edgar Saltus\nhas done. The recorded facts are his birth in New York in 1858, his education\nhere and at the Sorbonne, his visits to European capitals, his three marriages,\nhis wealth and its loss, and his long succession of books. In his work are many\ngrains of pollen from the great pessimists and from Balzac and Gautier.\nRumor goes on to elaborate upon his recluse habits, his gigantic indifference\nto the ordinary concerns of man, his Balzacian hours of work and his Balzacian\ntheory that the artist must carry his sex in his brain. A glamorous romantic\npersonality who has been enveloped in the limbo partly because of his disdain for\njournalistic advertising but mainly because the prevalent attitude of the literary\nmoguls in the period in which he wrote most of his books was that which is\ngiven concretely in the following excerpts on \" The Daughters of the Rich.\"\n\"It is strange that a practised hand like that of Mr. Saltus should have\nreleased to any mark but the waste basket a thing that suggests, both in tone\nand style, a muddy-minded schoolboy's first attempts to imitate De Maupas-\nsant.\" The Nation Jl. 1/09 (Paul Elmer More, literary editor).\nToday he is still submerged because our aggressive seekers for a virile\nAmerican Literature find him too exotic, too Gallic, let us say. But we can\nno more control literary cross-currents than we can keep the wind from spread-\ning pollen far and wide. The English do not reject Arnold Ben net because\nhe has learned much from the French novel. Why must we proclaim only\nthe impossibly pure-blooded ? Why have we not, as other nations have, room"}, {"page_pdf": 78, "page_imprimee": "259", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.78", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2692, "texte": "in our literature for strange flora and fauna ? Edgar Saltus has admittedly\nbeen greatly influenced by European art, but he has not imitated to the point\nwhere his idiosyncracies vanish. His work is his own.\nTo read Saltus is to take a showerbath of jewels. But it is not to explore\na great ocean with thousand-league currents and wide treasure caves of gold.\nFor that we can turn to William Vaughn Moody.\nIII.\nThe experience of reading the poetry of Moody is rich and full. His gor-\ngeous imagery and color, his flexible lines with their delicacy and music, his\ndramatic sense, his studious control with its suggestion of untapped reserves\nof power are strengthened by a well developed and unusually strong interior\norganization. By interior organization I mean what painters call a third dimen-\nsional solidity and what Willard Huntington Wright calls documentary solidity\nin literature. Moody knew how to make aesthetic use of his passion, greater\nemotions, proud rebelliousness and philosophy : he knew how to fuse them with.\nhis design so that its elements took on body, became firm, modelled, and\nweighty, and yet preserved their balanced motion.\nIt is curious that some aspects of the interior organization of Moody's\npoetry should not have attracted critics like Van Wyck Brooks and Waldo\nFrank who are raking back and forth over American literature to create a usable\npast. It is curious that there should have been only one exemplar of Young\nAmerica who has written about him. In 1914, in the Little Review, George\nSoule said : \" Here, surely, is an American poet who speaks in eternal terms\nof the new inspiration ; one who was sane and blazing at the same time ; one\nwho in order to be modern did not need to use a poor imitation of Whitman,\nscreech of boiler factories and exalt a somewhat doubtful brand of democracy ;\none who was uncompromisingly radical without being feverish ; above all, one\nwho succeeded in writing the most beautiful verse without going to London\nto do it. When one is oppressed with the doubt of American possibilities it is\na renewal of faith to turn to him, If Whitman is of our soil, is no less\nso ; through these two the best in us has so far found its individual expression.\"\nThere are three aspects of Moody that should attract young Americans of\nthis school.\nHe was, first of all, a doubter. For him, as for us, the old gods had been\nshattered and he was profoundly groping for new ones. He had no facile op-\ntimism : he did not know whether God was in his heaven and Pangloss was right :\nhe did not know even that imperialists in China and the Phillippines were right\n(in fact, his patriotism, took a very eloquent stand against them). More reli-"}, {"page_pdf": 79, "page_imprimee": "260", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.79", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2823, "texte": "gious than any contemporary, he contemplated Christ with wistful eyes and\nthen half-turned away. The road to Calvary lacked completely satisfying\norchestration for this questing adventurous pilgrim who winged his doubts\nwith a strong hopefulness.\nSecondly, Moody had a vivid sense of social sin. It is a thought of Randolph\nBourne's that our ancestors suffered from personal sin, we from social wrongs.\nThere was rebellion in the very base of Moody's soul against the degradation\nof mankind by the machiiie, there was superb anger against the captains of\nearth, reckless, aghast, gorged, who battened the hatches on souls, cursing,\nsighing, distraught and sad, there was wonderment at the social inequalities\nof the time. Here then we have another sensitive spirit recoiling from the\nwholesale sadisms of our present industrial organization.\nThird, Moody worked out a great synthesis for himself, the outline perhaps\nof a future religion. It was a philosophical union of Pan and Christ, a harmony\nof Pan's lust of living and beauty-madnesses with the gentle anarchic brotherhood\nof man of the romantic Jesus. Moody was pagan to a delightful degree, but\nhe could not accept gladiatorial shows and slavery. He was Christian in many\nof his outlooks, but the laughing earth and libidinous liotous man must be af-\nfirmed. His culture was of both Greece and Nazareth and most fittingly has\nSoule called him \" a great pilgrim-pagan.\" His perfect physical endowment,\nhis firm intellect, his stout heart, his gift of artistry, his vital erudition, his\nquestioning religious soul gave him such fulness of life as rarely comes to anyone in\na generation of Americans. He was a bachanalian, an artist, a lover : he wor-\nshipped Bacchus, Apollo, Eros. And these, I suggest, are the gods America needs.\nAll this is in Moody's work but he carried it as an artist. His doubts and\nindignations and philosophy disengage themselves for us from an aesthetic\nexperience. His projections were deep but his surfaces were proportioned. At\npresent the greatest relevance is an exhortation to read the Poems and Poetic\nDramas and it is to reinforce my urgency that I list May Sinclair, Robert Morss\nLovett, Ridgely Torrence and Edwin Arlington Robinson as admirers of\nthis poet.\nHe died in 1910. The era of experimentation and achievement in vers\nlibre followed hard after and doubtless distracted attention from Gloucester\nMoors and The Masque of Judgment. Yet culture is traditional as well as insati-\nable for departures, and it is not rash to predict a growing discovery of a man\nwho worked traditional metrical poetry into a complex • full toned organ for\nhimself, an organ distinguishable from that of any other poet. His poetry\nis a splendid fruition after which young American poets might well turn to\nrevolt and experiment.\n\nGorham B. Munson"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c032", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c032", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "261", "page_fin": "265", "image_debut": 80, "image_fin": 84, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.31", "titre_corps": "Dedicated To The Enemy", "titre_sommaire": "Dedicated To The Enemy", "signature_source": "Gordon Craig", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 80, "page_imprimee": "261", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.80", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 23, "texte": "DEDICATED TO THE ENEMY."}, {"page_pdf": 80, "page_imprimee": "261", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.80", "debut_caractere": 39, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1778, "texte": "IX\nThe Business man is an essential to any Theatre. But it is a mistake, .. .\na fatal one for which everyone has to pay . . . when he is at the head of a\nTheatre \\\nFor try how we may to attribute to him qualifications as head, we cannot\nadmit that he understands the difference between a good play, a very good\nplay, and a foolish play : neither can we allow that his judgment is sound in so\nfar as eye and ear are concerned or that he has what we call good taste. That\nis not part of his Business — how should it be ?\nThe Business man has one object — to make a thing pay. It is necessary\nto a modern theatre that it should pay — it should pay its way anyhow, and\nafter that provide for a rainy day.\nThe money which comes in from the public should not go into the pockets\nof shareholders. It should return to the Public, .. . and in this manner :. . .\nEach year's profit should be spent on Improvement of the Theatre :\nEnlargement of the Theatre: Development of its capacity to delight, instruct,\nand satisfy the Public.\nA School should be added to the Theatre : a library, a museum :. . . (some\nfew theatres have fairly good libraries and museums, but the schools are not\ngood). Each Theatre should have its own Pension Fund for its most faith-\nful adherents.\nIf there was enough to spare, it should devote a yearly sum to helping other\nless successful theatres in extremity.\n1 I will go so far as to say it has proved THE fatal mistake — and it is has been\nslowly ruining the whole European and American Dramatic Art for the past hundred\nyears.\nIt is now just a hundred years since Napoleon died: Byron is exiled : and the com-\nmonplace is found to be a relief to all true (and egoistical) democrats. The golden mean\nof a pinchbeck age."}, {"page_pdf": 81, "page_imprimee": "262", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.81", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2254, "texte": "There are very many ways in which the money could be made to benefit\nthe Public and the Art at the same time.\nAll I insist on is that shareholders should not profit, for that merely for-\nces a business man to the head of affairs, and very properly his sole thought\nis for his shareholders .. . Oh! he will talk very noble language, giving us\nthe usual catchpenny phrases about his working solely for the Public's benefit :\nbut that he cannot do this is clear, for his is a mind which is unable to com-\nprehend what will benefit anyone except his shareholders.\nThe practice of having a business man at the head is widespread in England.\nIt makes it abominably difficult for the actors and for artists to make headway.\nIt is a very grave pity.\nSometimes a so-called \" artist \" acts the business man. There are a few\nsuch \"artists \" in London and in control at central theatres.\nWhat they give us may be called \" the grandest show ever known on earth, \"\nand it may even be a good slapdash show, . . . but to run it for their sharehold-\ners and not to put all profits to benefit Public and Playhouse and the Per-\nformers is wrong as it can be.\nSo it comes to it that neither a quite honest business man nor the dishon-\nest \" artist \" ought to be in the position of head of a theatre.\nI wish Law and Order — the Powers which be — and not only the powers\nwhich may be before long, could see such simple matters as these in their\ntrue light.\nX\nTo the Egoist\nYou have reason to be desperate, my dear confrere, if impelled by ambi-\ntion, and governed by your ego, you attempt to be what you call the \" Napo-\nleon of the Theatre \". . . or the \" Catherine of the Stage. \" Because your\naffair should be your Art, and I think that the less of an organizer you are,\nthe less you will come to despair.\nIf before your art is seen by your contemporaries. . . the mob ... or the\nPublic, you are obliged to push, to advertise to engage what our dear cousins\ncall \" barkers, \" you are putting upon yourself a strain which you are not called\nto put upon yourself.\nSuppose you have some push in you — which in your egoism you call\nwill, — and suppose we exalt it to the heights and honour it with the name of\nAction, what is all your action really worth in this field of Art ?"}, {"page_pdf": 82, "page_imprimee": "263", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.82", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2646, "texte": "You value it evidently, and the Public — your Public — values it. But\nthat is has true value is very doubtful. In fact, we may be pretty well sure\nthat it is not worth a fig. That's the worst of it: — would to goodness it was\nas easy as that.\nBurnt up, transformed, translated, transmuted into something really val-\nuable to the artist, and you cease altogether from action. You are not to\ndo as Napoleon does but as Beethoven does and as Mozart does. Remember\nthat Wagner was just what you admire — a colossal figure in the world of Art .. .\nbut by the side of Beethoven and Mozart he cuts a very poor figure — no ?\nAnd the term \" the Napoleon of the Theatre, \" although we know what\nit signifies, is not at all a happy one ; for Napoleon would have been the last\nman, had he chosen to conquer in the field of Art and disregard all other fields, . . .\nhe would have been the last man to waste his strength organizing — pushing —\nNapoleonizing. He would have followed Mozart's lead.\nNapoleon as artist would have wasted no energy guiding people, dominat-\ning human society, showing impatience when restrained, brooking no rivals,\ncontemptuous towards those who refused to render him homage, looking on\nthe world as a great banquet open to any comer and where long arms are the\nmain necessity, grabbing the sign of the highest excellence, and to the devil\nwith the others.\nIt seems to me that you sometimes do in a little way what Napoleon would\nnever have done even in a big way had he been the artist you are;. .. what\nBeethoven never did, nor Mozart; what Wagner through his work shall suffer\nfor having done.\nRule out ambition of that kind from your programme altogether.. . and\nyou'll feel twice as strong and achieve ten times as much. Already you know\nthey speak of you as Napoleonic — awfully dangerous.\nYou are probably just as impatient as the great men and women have\nbeen ; you are probably an epileptic in a mild way. Be reasonable and direct\nthis force that is more than you, in the way it will most profit us, your fellow\nmen — and yourself. Artist — Egoist.... think of yourself, I beg of you.\nYou need not be an altruist to do that. It would become you better to\nbe a treble egoist. . . but have sense .. . show method in your madness. Put\nthe right saddle on the back of your Pegasus, and don't, oh don't, put it hind-\nside-fore.\nThese \" Napoleons, \" dear Reader, the Napoleons of the Theatre always\ncome into existence because they get muddled early in life and imagine that an\nartist is a man of action.\nBut what has Art to do with Action, or what the deuce is the ass thinking\nof who calls on an artist to be a man of action ?"}, {"page_pdf": 83, "page_imprimee": "264", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.83", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2448, "texte": "Leonardo da Vinci, Shakespeare, Moli£re, Beethoven, Mozart, ... do these\nnames suggest to such a great ass — anything ?\nLet me help the great ass.\nThese artist had Patrons .. . who acted for them. These Patrons supplied\nthe funds .. . How ? Let me suggest a little more by a few more names ... .\nThe Duke of Milan ; the Earl of Leicester ; Louis XIV ; the Cardinal at Salzburg\n(one forgets his name) ; and the little Prince Lichnowsky.\nThere in their order, five patrons to five supreme artists . . . were men of\naction — of paltry action. The five artists were not (my dear and patient ass)\nmen of action at all .. . Have you understood ?\nOur Theatres have lately somehow been clogged with men of action, Na-\npoleons of the Stage.\nOpen the doors — let them and their glorious self-importance escape ...\nor we shall have a thousand little Napoleons.\nWhat we have been working for years in our Movement Towards a New\nTheatre is to grow Artists not Men of Action. For it is easier to produce five\nhundred men of action than one artist.\nA man of action is a fine thing anywhere except where the Arts are to\nthrive. He may hover around, he may even show his remarkable powers\nof action by ordering a cathedral or two, a theatre or two, but he must not put\nfoot in our workshop.\nWe are patient sort of madmen, we artist-workmen, but we have oubliettes\nclose to our work tables.\nGentlemen posing as Patrons, as men of action, as connoisseurs, have thou-\nsands of times come meddling too near the table and have been known to disap-\npear suddenly.\nWho was that great fool at Salzburg who posed as being the Patron of\nMozart ? I forget who he was, but I know where he is. He is down an ou-\nbliette.\nThe Earl of Leicester, who failed to build Shakespeare a decent theatre —\nwhere is he ? The Patron of Beethoven, that poor Prince lichnowsky, where\nis he ? . . . \" in our memory locked \" down an oubliette and drowned every time\nwe think of him in our laughter ... a farce of a fool.\nI am making a list (I would give it here but it requires more time to make\nit quite complete), of the hundred or two hundred artists whose work we have\nhad and in some cases still have, and short facts as to their sustenance . . . and\ntheir patrons.\nI wish to show by this list that if there are fifty fine artists who are as\npoor as was Mozart, there are fifty who were as rich as Rubens ; and that\nthis being the case it is an exaggeration for Lord Rosebery to assert that"}, {"page_pdf": 84, "page_imprimee": "265", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.84", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2281, "texte": "\" Genius thrives on Poverty and Ait is smothered by riches. \" Because some\nGreek writer said so before Lord Rosebery polished up the phrase for some\nmeeting whereat everyone wept and crowed over the death of Robert Burns\nis no special matter. There are some lies which even started in Greece ... Ben-\nvenuto's old proverb \" cats of good breed hunt better fat than lean \" is as apt\nto-day as when the Pope first heard it from old Cellini and made a bold effort\nto look less mean than he was.\nBut because Patrons betray us — because we be poor — this is no reason\nfor becoming \" men of action, \" \" Napoleons of the stage. \" Our instinct on\nreceiving a letter from Ours faithfully our Patron to tell us that he is sorry he\ncannot help us . . . (that is to say, our work) . . . that though he promised us two\nor three thousand a year to help the work he now regrets that owing to some\none having persuaded his weakness to act differently .. . e. to break his word .. .\nhe must now stop sending the sums he ladled out grudgingly month by month1\n. our instinct on getting such a letter is to turn business man, is it not ? To\nbecome men of action, — to be free from such fellows. If that were possible —\nto be business man and artist, well and good : but it don't work — it really\ndon't. No, the artist must remember that it is as possible to be backed by a\nwrong 'un as it is to back a wrong un. If the artist is of no use at all; if\nhe is not able to create, lacking in vision and skill to express, then he is indeed\na poor horse to back: — but say he has all the powers we expect an artist to\nhave, then if things go ill he can assuredly claim to have been backed by\na wrong' un — and wait for another event.\nMy point is that whatever betide, the artist must never change his mind —\nit must be the mind of the artist once and for ever. Never the man of action,\nnever the impresario, never the Napoleon of the Arts.\n1 I was told last month of just such a patron of the arts ... an Englishman . . . who\nis one of the very wealthiest Lords of Great Britain, who used to dole out month by\nmonth his promised support, . . . but listen, . . . only after he had received two letters\nof reminder, a telegram, and sometimes a telephone message per month. . . Incredible but\ntrue.\n\nGordon Craig"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c033", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c033", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "266", "page_fin": "270", "image_debut": 85, "image_fin": 89, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.32", "titre_corps": "Made In America", "titre_sommaire": "Made In America", "signature_source": "Matthew Josephson", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 85, "page_imprimee": "266", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.85", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2237, "texte": "MADE IN AMERICA\n\nThe cost of living in Europe becomes very cheap for Americans because\nof the high dollar exchange. Boatloads of Americans, therefore, transport\nthemselves to Europe and, basking in its milder climate, blossoming under\nits floods of beer and wine, conceive a new culture which is entirely contrary\nto all the tendencies which burgeon between San Diego and Bangor. They\n\" hate \" the United States, nation of bad taste, shorn of liberty, ungentle to\ntheir paranoias and inhibitions.\nIn Paris they are subject to the precise influences of the glittering French\nmind. Good Heavens ! America is now all the rage here : the American ci-\nnema, American shoes, skyscrapers, business methods, even American drinks.\nThey hastily turn a somersault and proceed to reconstruct a United States\nexperienced from a safe distance of three thousand miles through European\nspy-glasses . . .\nA very plausible thesis, this of Mr. IyOeb. However, it is assumed a priori\nthat the Americans in Montparnasse are in a certain accord in their decisions\non matters of art and of ethics. In reality, the Americans who have poured\ninto Paris impress one with their bewildering ranges of mediocrity. For the most\npart, they seldom speak French, never read the literary reviews published in\nParis, and isolate themselves so completely with their compatriots in an expa-\ntriated and vicious American milieu that there is scarcely any liaison with\nFrench ideas.\nThere are, of course, a few men living in Paris (not necessarily in Mont-\nparnasse) whose capacities one respects but whose reactions to and affinities\nwith the French literature of the day are remarkably different. Artists simply\nwill not herd. It can no more be said of these men that they echo a French\nart under American influences than it can be said that all American writers\nare headed for the diffuse subjective naturalism that has recently been crown-\ned in New York.\nMr. lyoeb's observations on the American literary scene, proper, seem per-\nfectly just. There is a dreadful lack of clarity among the critics of the \" ad-\nvanced \" journals. The \" iconoclastic spirit \" still roars about, still rants at Pur-\nitanism, asserts that American husbands are occasionally prompted to infld-"}, {"page_pdf": 86, "page_imprimee": "267", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.86", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2864, "texte": "elity, or that vers libre is a perfectly justifiable form of poetry. Writers who\ngive a \" cross-section of life \" are rendered a helping hand in Vanity Fairt Prizes\nare awarded to persons who write sincere but wretched verses about the\nA. E. F. .. . Sic ! Occasionally a self-conscious interest is evinced in some-\nthing that is more exotic : in de Gourmont, for instance. Quite by way of\nsnobism.\nI have become convinced that the whole foul morass of all this is due to the\ndesire, naive enough, to vulgarize literature in America.\nCertain individuals launch a pretentious magazine which is designed to\nsupport and publish pure literature. (Loud applause). Within a year they\nhave succeeded in gravitating toward something solid and nourishing, something\nonly a shade different from Harpers' or the Atlantic Montly. Vulgarization,\neclecticism. Give the best French, Russian, German minds to the PEOPIJb !\n(\" It is to the creation of an attentive an 4 critical environment that the Dial s\naward testifies And elsewhere something to the effect that \"we would\nonly be doing half our duty \" if we did not heed the other half).\nThis is the risk we run in attempting with Mr. lyoeb to \" bridge the sepa-\nration between 'highbrow ' and 'lowbrow ' which isolates the artist from the\ncommunity. \"\nThere is a larger audience, to be sure, for the artist in Paris. But the true\nartist here is not fooled by this fact into compromise. I have been assured\nagain and again by young writers that the gulf between the great public and them-\nselves is wider than ever before. These conditions are due on the one hand io the sus-\npicion and bigotry that are the wake of war, and on the other hand 10 the pro-\nhibitive efforts of some of the influential literary journals toward vulgarization.\nUnder these conditions the avant-garde is even more intransigent than ever in\nits isolation from the public of the press and the theatre.\nBy 1918, thirty years of symbolist poetry, fifty or sixty evenly matched\npoets had nearly all been laid asunder. The hundreds of volumes of painfully\nwrought verses for which Remy de Gourmont was the spokesman become too\ntiresome to be intelligible. Henry de Regnier, Paul Pott, Pernand Gregh, and\na host of Academicians may be read in the daily press or in La Revue de Paris,\nbut they do not cross our trail.\nIt is Andre Gide who emerged from the war with the strongest literary\nfollowing. Gide, an extraordinary personality, together with Jaques Riviere built\nup the Nouvelle Revue Frangaise, the centre, if you will, of French letters to-\nday. Its characteristics were at once the art-egoism of Gide, mirrored in such\nkindred spirits as Jean Girandoux, Paul Morand, Valery Ivarbaud, and the\ndiverse mysticism, at once, of Francis James, of Jules Romains, of Andre Suares,\nof Paul Claudel. The indefatigable Marcel Proust is ranged with them. The N."}, {"page_pdf": 87, "page_imprimee": "268", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.87", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2823, "texte": "R. F., in short, has represented no one tendency. It has been eclectic to the\npoint of inviting members of the Dada group to contribute, in its fear of not\nseeming catholic enough. It has been sagaciously directed, has reached\na wide public, and serves the excellent purpose which the Mercure de France\ndid ten years ago. Its crystallization ad absurdum was attained last winter\nwith the establishment of a school for the instruction of young poets under the\nguidance of Jules Romains.\nIt would scarcely be fair, then, to regard the N. R. F. as the wing of French\nletters that offers something novel or corrupting. For the rest, Andre Sal-\nmon and Max Jacob, allied as they are with Cubism, are the exponents of a mo-\ndernity which was purely of the moment and ended with yesterday. Girau-\ndoux and Morand are whimsical and ironical enough but it is a rather facile\nmanner at bottom. All these are the men who have largely attracted atten-\ntion abroad, and who, Mr. Iyoeb suspects, may have persuaded some of the Amer-\nican writers in Paris into a revaluation of their homeland.\nVery little, then, is offered in the way of nourishment for the American quester\nof literary gold. In spite of the appearance of a number of impressive look-\ning revues and the surprisingly strong industrial support of art, the present\nhour is not an auspicious one for French letters. It is a moment perhaps, of too\ngreat transition. The writers who have been conspicuously presented are\ntoo obviously small talents, excessively mannered, using a paltry mask of\nmodernity.\nJean Cocteau is a typical case. Trumpeted as the last word in modern\ndeviltry, this man has almost succeeded in confusing and diverting whatever\nattention the public has been disposed to give to the newer art movements.\nHis has been the glaring example of the cheap and offensive shifts for shocking\nthe bourgeois which Mr. Iyoeb condemns. The method in his poetry has simply\nbeen to make un-musical and irritating verses which refer to expresses, steam-\nboats, aeroplanes, the unconscious, the rubber heel, etcetera, thereby bringing\nhis wiitirigs squarely up to 1922 ! He is again a clever man, occasionally\nworth listening to in the prose medium, although his poetry leaves a perfect\nblank in the brain.\nThere is still a small determined faction to turn to far younger men who have\nneither attained their ripest growth nor been accepted in the name of authentic\nliterature. To an American who has been intensely conscious of his environ-\nment during the first quarter of this century and the trend of American life,\nthe spirit and tentatives of this left wing indicate a striking departure from the\nother currents.\nThe stimulus came directly out of the brain of the Comte de Iyautreamont,\nwho chanted in his Poesies preface : \" Man is great and his greatness consists"}, {"page_pdf": 88, "page_imprimee": "269", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.88", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2846, "texte": "ill that he will not know himself miserable !!. . . Greatness refutes sorrow.\nMy thoughts are unchained. The heart of man is a book I have learned to\nesteem.\n\" Man is the conqueror of chimeras, the novelty of tomorrow, the order\nthat rules chaos. . . He judges all things. He is the depository of truth, the\ncollector of certitudes, the glory not the butt of the universe. ...\"\nOut of Iyautreamont and Rimbaud came the stimulus toward an affirm-\native Promethean attitude. The whole nineteenth centurv erred, according\nmf ' O\nto Iyautreamont, in that its literature echoed and re-echoed the note of doubt,\ndespair, and humility, instead of affirmation, self-assertion and human triumph\nover nature which embody the actual achievements of that century. The\n'90s were even more sterile in their refinement of skepticism, sickness and ennui.\nThe young men who at the close of the War courageously advanced these\nideas as the basis for a new art in the pages of Litterature during 1919-21 are\nthe present left wing of French letters referred to above. Iyouis Aragon, Andre\nBreton, Paul Eluard, Philippe Soupault, Tristan Tzara have been producing\nprose and poetry since the close of the War which sought a mood of humor\ninstead of pathos, aggression instead of doubt, and complete freedom of me-\nthod for tire restrictions of the previous age.\nIt matters little that this movement encompassed Badaism which frighten-\ned and offended so many, nor that Dada is unquestionably dead. A strong\nimpetus has been given to unlimited experiment with form, to a greater daring\nand a more penetrating humor. Apollinaire, who at the time of his unfortun-\nate death was close to these young writers, urged them to the greatest\npossible liberties. To be at least as daring as the mechanical geniuses of the\nage which has attained the veritable realization of the miracles forecast in\nprimitive fables. To be the prophets alike, the fable-makers for the incre-\ndible ages to come !\nThe machine is not \" flattening us out \" nor \" crushing us. \" The machine\nis our magnificent slave, our fraternal genius. We are a new and hardier\nrace, friend to the sky-scraper and the subterranean railway as well.\nWe are at home under the sea as well as in the air, and we can sing\nand laugh as heartily under these .transformed conditions. The whole scene,\nstrangely enough is much more provocative of mirth than of condemnation.\nThe work of these younger men makes no bow to the public. Liberat-\ned as they are from all tendencies to make the public a little more \" highbrow \"\nand themselves a little more \" lowbrow, \" they carry prose and poetry into\nnew roles. The novels of Aragon, Anicet and Telemaque obey the requisites\nof poetry for music, color, freedom of movement. Les Champs Magnetiques\nin which Breton and Soupault collaborated is a novel without plot or characters."}, {"page_pdf": 89, "page_imprimee": "270", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.89", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1933, "texte": "The poems of Eluard are written in prose rather than in verses, but they\nare not Poemes en prose. There is place here to indicate little else than that\nthese men who may well have their best work yet before them are confirmed\nexplorers who are turning up fresh soil. From a purely philological point\nof view their experiments with argot, with profanity, with the unconscious\nzones in natural speech mark them apart from their contemporaries. The\nFrench language becomes less thin and pellucid, gains body and richness.\nSo much, briefly, for their technique. We can scaicely follow them\nin these directions. Our language tendencies are Elizabethan. And in Amer-\nica there has been an equal groping toward purer forms of literature in iso-\nlated corners, here and there among younger writers.\nWitnessing as we are the gradual Americanization of the Eastern Hemi-\nsphere, it would surely be a strange surrender of our prerogatives to imitate\nEurope, or Paris, for that matter. The fundamental attitude of aggression,\nhumor, unequivocal affirmation which they pose, comes most naturally from\nAmerica. The high speed and tension of American life may have been exported\nin quantity to Europe. But we are still richest in material. Our preposterous\nnaive profound film will never be surpassed by artistic or literary German\ncinemas. No cities will quite equal what New York or Chicago or Tulsa have.\nWe have only to roll a great big boulder over all the little American au-\nthor-insects who are still imitating a discredited French naturalism of fifty\nyears ago. We have only to free ourselves of fixed ideas as to how a prose-\nstory or a verse-poem should be written. Reacting to purely American sour-\nces, to the at once bewildering and astounding American panorama, which only\nChaplin and a few earnest unsung film-directors have mirrored, we may yet\namass a new folk-lore out of the domesticated miracles of our time.\n\nMatthew Josephson"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c034", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c034", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "271", "page_fin": "272", "image_debut": 90, "image_fin": 91, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.33", "titre_corps": "Comment", "titre_sommaire": "Comment", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 90, "page_imprimee": "271", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.90", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2259, "texte": "COMMENT\n• We have received the first number of Secession a new literary review publish-\ned by Gorham B. Munson in Vienna. According to the editorial pronounce-\nment, Secession exists for those who are preoccupied with researches for new\nforms. One of its collaborators writes that Secession can really be a pretty good\norgan, because, after all, the sky is its limit. Broom wishes every success\nto its young contemporary which, at least, will not be hindered by lack of room.\nThe first number aligns itself in a general way with Post-Dadaism. Tris-\ntan Tzara and Aragon collaborate in translations. Malcolm Cowley,\nMatthew Josephson, Will Bray and the editor contribute the American portion.\nThe responsibility for the review is laid in part upon the Dial in an expose\nwhich closes : \" The existence of this Yale-Review-in-a-Harvard-blazer is one\nof the bitter necessities calling for Secession.\nSince Cezanne. By Cuvß Beu, (Chatto and Windus, js. net).\nMr. Bell continues emphatically to assert, and finds a remarkable number\nof different ways in which to reiterate, that significant form is the one essential\nproperty of a work of art. His position has become less confident, however,\nwith the passing years, for the old Clive Bell would never have asked u I do not\ndisbelieve in absolute beauty : only, can we recognize it ? \"\nIf we remember rightly, once upon a time Mr. Bell was not only sure of his\nown ability to recognize it, but also of the capacity in this direction of all\nsensitive humans as well.\nSince Cezanne well accomplishes its stated purpose. \"To put the public\nin the way of aesthetic pleasure. \"\nIn the May number of Broom an error occurred in our acknowledgement of\nE pur si muove. The author of this book, a study of the constructive bases\nof the various aesthetic trends of Europe, is Mr. Elie Ehrenburg. The inter-\nnational magazine of modern art, with which we confused it, is L'Ob jet published\nby Russians in Berlin, under the direction of El Lissitzky and Elie Ehrenburg.\nThe new magazine outlines its purposes in a long manifesto written in three\nlanguages. To quote in part: —\n\" The appearance of UOb jet is a symptom of the exchange of experiences which\nis recommencing between the young artisans of Russia and of the Occident."}, {"page_pdf": 91, "page_imprimee": "272", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.91", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1984, "texte": "\" L'Objet is the junction of two related trends. We assist at the birth of\na great constructive epoch. It goes without saying that reaction and bourgeois\nobstinacy are still powerful in Europe as well as in Russia, unseated from its\nold foundations. But all the efforts of old believers cannot retard the construc-\ntion of n«ew forms of life and of matter. The days of destruction, of sieges and\ntrenches are over.\n\"It is time to build on the cleared-off soil. That which is dead will disap-\npear of itself, but the empty ground has no need of programs or of schools,\nbut of work.\n\" L'Ob jet does not deny the past in the past. —In invites modern work for\nmodern times. That is why the vestiges of the day before yesterday, such as\nimpressionism, symbolism, etc, are hostile to it. We consider the triumph of\nconstructive methods as the essential trait of our time. We observe it as well\nin the new economics, as in the development of industry and psychology of\nthe Moderns in art.\n\" L'Objet stands for constructive art which does not embellish life, but which\norganizes it. We have called our review L'Objet because art exists for the crea-\ntion of new objects. It is that which explains the attraction which realism,\nweight, volume, the earth have for us.\n\" But it must not be concluded that the word L'Objet means for us objects\nof current usage. Naturally in the case of utilitarian objects fabricated in fac-\ntories, in the case of the areoplane, or the automobile we see the art of form.\nBut we do not wish to limit the production of artists to utilitarian objects.\n\" L'Objet considers a poem, a plastic form, a play as indispensable objects.\nL'Objet will observe with profound attention the reciprocal relations between\nmodern art and all the various manifestations of reality : science, politics, techni-\nque, customs, etc.\n\" In suffocating atmosphere, in exhausted Russia, in somnolent Europe\none cry rises.\n\" live — stop making declarations and contradictions — make objects"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c035", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c035", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "272", "page_fin": "272", "image_debut": 91, "image_fin": 91, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.34", "titre_corps": "Other Books Received", "titre_sommaire": "Other Books Received", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 91, "page_imprimee": "272", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.91", "debut_caractere": 1986, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2243, "texte": "OTHER BOOKS RECEIVED\nRahab. By Frank (Boni and Iyiveright, New York).\nThe Foundations of Aesthetics. By C. K. Ogden, I. A. Richards, and\nJ. Wood (G. Allen and Unwin, Iyondon, js. 6d. net).\nLa Danse de Qiva. By Ananda Coomaraswamy (F. Rieder et Cie., Paris)."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c037", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c037", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "[273]", "page_fin": "[273]", "image_debut": 92, "image_fin": 92, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.36", "titre_corps": "[Publicité]", "titre_sommaire": "[Publicité]", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 92, "page_imprimee": "[273]", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.92", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 375, "texte": "Pa rfu m PA RI S „\n6 U/ie new COTYcreationll\n( fzscinatioiz of £2^CLViS—/Ae\nvivid brilliant personality of tire,\ncity courage—it brea tk es\nits indescriba bl& allure* iri the,\neoccjuisite- perfume, PAR.I S „\nike- veritable spirit esse-Tzce, of\n, the. citi,\ny\nc^J\n\"PARIS.\npSSENCE\nTOILET WATER\nPACE POWDER\nCOMPACT\nSACHET\nfleu? C 714- fffth \"venue\nOTtonireal 14- Phillips Square"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c038", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c038", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "[274]", "page_fin": "[274]", "image_debut": 93, "image_fin": 93, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.37", "titre_corps": "[Publicité]", "titre_sommaire": "[Publicité]", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 93, "page_imprimee": "[274]", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.93", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 183, "texte": "./Pearl\nno\nj6O fx\nvenue\n(UVeiucljorh\n=-m\nr=i\nr™\n■ •.,\nilj! -\nris\njg WItr\" CenturyJei\nWs- Casket—'beionqL\n|112 lotherDuchesse\n==;\": cU?<Y(? Tldoiric^-\n112\neioe\nc ru\niffiii\nWmWIB\nII\n%S,"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c039", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c039", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "n. p.", "page_fin": "n. p.", "image_debut": 94, "image_fin": 94, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.38", "titre_corps": "[Publicité]", "titre_sommaire": "[Publicité]", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 94, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.94", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 567, "texte": "The largest selling quality\npencil in the world.\nAS soft as you\nwish; as hard as\nyou please, but al-\nways smoother than\nyou had dreamed.\nAny VENUS Pen-\ncil you select glides\nover the paper with\na restful freedom free\nfrom friction.\n17 Black Degrees\n3 Copying\nFor bold heavy lines\n68-58-48-3B\nFor writing, sketching\n28-B-HB-F-H\nFor clean fine lines\n2H-3H-4H-SH-6H\nFor delicate, thin lines\n7H-BH-9H\nPlain Ends,\nper doz. $ 1.00\nRubber Ends,\nper doz. $ 1.20\nAt Stationers and Stores\nthroughout the World.\nAmerican\nLead Pencil Co\n220 Fifth Avenue\nNew York\nand London, Eng."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaap-1922-06-01-c040", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01#c040", "volume": "bmtnaap_1922-06_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "n. p.", "page_fin": "n. p.", "image_debut": 94, "image_fin": 94, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.2.39", "titre_corps": "[Publicité]", "titre_sommaire": "[Publicité]", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 94, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.94", "debut_caractere": 569, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1292, "texte": "carv nvcre\njf\\ words express Row\n41 you. jeef ?~-\n\\ AjUr yow»Ve done vour feest\n—-tear it u.p and\nWitf%,^(oWersf\nSHE is, wric Of -phone us,\nand we'll arrange -far >Vnmg<3i?rlg delivery\nin zry city rn Und t-thanks i- Oar\n3,000 6?»hd£4 r^rusery{»iiv^# .. # ,\n75iE «f'Jkw%rk\" ?^'\n-785 PFm 724 -\n' t/^ew^or^\nODOOCDCDCDCDCDOtSIDDnDtSICDDDCDCDDDCDGDCDGDGDCOISIODCDCD\nCD CO\nCD CD\nCD (XI\n| Daniel Gallery |\nCO CD\nCO PAINTINGS BY MODERN CO\nCO CD\nCO CD\nAmerican and French Artists\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCO\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCO\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\ncd\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\n2 WEST 47™ STREET H\nCD\n§ NEW YORK CITY = {3}\nCD CD\nCD CD\nCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCD"}]}], "pages_ocr_originales": [{"page_pdf": 2, "page_imprimee": "[183]", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.2", "texte": "BROOM\nAn International Magazine of the Arts Published by Harold A. Loeb.\nEditor, Haroed A. Loeb. Associate Editor, Edward Storer. American Editor, Loea Ridge.\nJUNE, 1922\nAPPEARS MONTHLY\nvoe. 2, no 3.\nThe Editor of Broom will be pleased to consider rnss. submitted to him, but all mss. must\nbe accompanied by a self-addressed, stamped envelope. The Editor cannot hold himself respon-\nsible for loss of mss. in transit.\nMss. from Europe should be sent to the Rome office; mss. from America to the New\nYork office.\nThe price of Broom is :\nFor America, fifty cents the copy, and five dollars for a year's subscription. For Italy,\n10 lire the copy, and 100 lire for a year's subscription. For France, 6 francs the copy, and\n60 francs for a year's subscription. For Great Britain, 3/6 the cop}', and one pound and fifteen\nshillings for a year's subscription.\nThe contents of this issue are protected by copyright, January, 1922. Infringement of\nsame will be prosecuted.\nEntered as Second Class matter at the Post Office at New York, N. Y. April 22, 1922\nunder the Act of March 3, 1879.\n%\nHeadquarters, 68, Via Leccosa, Rome (9), Itaey.\nNew York Office, Three East Ninth Street.\nLondon Office, Cecie Paemer, Oakeey House, 15-18 Bloomsbury St., W. C. I.\n\nCover Design — Ladiseaw Medges.\nThe Apoeeo of Veii.\nHymn from A Watermeeon Pavieion — Waeeace Stevens 185\nSix Characters in Search of an Author. Act. I, — Luigi Pirandeeeo 186\nA Last Word — Henry Beeeaman 205\nHedges — Henry Beeeaman 206\nJacques Lipchitz and My Portrait Bust — Jean Cocteau 207\nJean Cocteau — Lipchitz 208\nImprovisations — Conrad Aiken 210\nScuepture — Lipchitz 216\nMurder — Waedo Frank 220\nStars at Taeeapoosa — Waeeace Stevens 236\nConversations —S. Foster Damon . 236\nAee is one — Martin Armstrong 237\nThe Apoeeo of Veii — Edward Storer 238\nEtruscan Head • 241\nIf You Had Three Husbands — Gertrude Stein 242\nWaste — Loea Ridge 247\nPoems — Edward Storer 248\nThe Limbo of American Literature — Gorham B. Munson. 250\nDedicated to the Enemy — Gordon Craig 261\nMade in America — Mathew Josephson 266\nComment . 271"}, {"page_pdf": 3, "page_imprimee": "[184]", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.3", "texte": "THE APOLLO OF VEII"}, {"page_pdf": 4, "page_imprimee": "185", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.4", "texte": "HYMN FROM A WATERMELON PAVILION\nWallace Stevens\nYou dweller in the dark cabin,\nTo whom the watermelon is always purple,\nWhose garden is wind and moon,\nOf the two dreams, night and day,\nWhat lover, what dreamer, would choose\nThe one obscured by sleep ?\nHere is the plantain by your door\nAnd the best cock of red feather\nThat crew before the clocks.\nA feme may come, leaf-green,\nWhose coining may give revel\nBeyond revelries of sleep,\nYes, and the blackbird spread its tail,\nSo that the sun may speckle,\nWhile it creaks hail.\nYou dweller in the dark cabin,\nRise, since rising will not waken,\nAnd hail, cry hail, cry hail."}, {"page_pdf": 5, "page_imprimee": "186", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.5", "texte": "SIX CHARACTERS IN SEARCH OF AN AUTHOR\n\nA Comedy in the Making\nACT I.\nCHARACTERS OF THE COMEDY IN THE MAKING:\nThe Father — The Mother — The Step-Daughter — The Son —\nThe Boy — The Chied — [The last two don't speak at all) Madame\nPace.\nACTORS OF THE COMPANY:\nThe Manager — Leading Lady — Leading Man — Second Lady\nLead — L'lng&nue — Juveniee Lead — Other Actors and Actresses —\nProperty Man — Prompter — Machinist — Manager's Secretary —\nDoor-keeper — Scene-shifters.\nDaytime. The Stage of a Theatre.\nN. B. The Comedy is without acts or scenes. The performance is interrupted once,\nwithout the curtain being lowered, when the manager and the chief character withdraw to ar-\nrange the scenario. A second interruption of the action takes place when, by mistake, the\nstage hand let the curtain down.\nNote\nThe spectators will find the curtain raised and the stage as it usually is during\nthe day time. It will be half dark and empty so that from, the beginning the public\nmay have the impression of an impromptu performance.\nPrompter's box and a small table and chair for the manager.\nTwo other small tables and several chairs scattered about as during re-\nhearsals.\nThe actors and actresses of the company enter from the back of the stage :\nfirst one, then another, then two together: nine or ten in all. They are about to\nrehearse a Pirandello play Mixing It Up. Some of the company move off to-"}, {"page_pdf": 6, "page_imprimee": "187", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.6", "texte": "wards their dressing rooms. The prompter who has the « book » under his arm, is\nwaiting for the Manager in order to begin the rehearsal.\nThe actors and actresses, some standing, some sitting, chat and smoke. One\nperhaps reads a paper ; another cons his part.\nFinally, the Manager enters and goes to the table prepared for him. His\nsecretary brings him his mail, at which he glances. The prompter takes his seat,\nturns on a light, and opens the \" book\nThe Manager {throwing a letter down on the table). I can't see {to\nProperty Man). Let's have a little light please.\nProperty Man. Yes, Sir, yes, at once {a light comes down on to the\nstage).\nThe Manager {clapping his hands). Come along ! Come along ! Second\nact of \" Mixing it Up \" {sits down).\n{The actors and actresses go from the front of the stage to the wings, all except\nthe three who are to begin the rehearsal).\nThe Prompter {reading the Book). Leo Gala's house. A curious room\nserving as dining-room and study.\nThe Manager {to Property Man). Fix up the old red room.\nProperty Man (•noting it down). Red set. All right.\nThe Prompter {continuing to read from Book). Table already laid and writ-\ning desk with books and papers. Book-shelves. Exit rear to Leo's Bedroom.\nExit left to kitchen. Principal exit to right.\nThe Manager {energetically). Well, you understand. There is the principal\nexit. Here the kitchen. {Turning to actor who is to play the part of Socrates)\nYou make your entrances and exits here. {To Property Man) The baize\ndoors at the rear and curtains.\nProperty Man {noting it down). Right oh!\nPrompter (;reading as before). When the curtain rises, Leo Gala, dress-\ned in cook's cap and apron is busy beating an egg in a cup. Philip, also\ndressed as a cook, is beating another egg. Guido Venanzi is seated and listens.\nLeading Man {to Manager). Excuse me, but must I absolutely wear a\ncook's cap ?\nThe Manager {annoyed). I imagine so. It says so there anyway {point-\ning to Book).\nLeading Man. But it's ridiculous !\nThe Manager {jumping up in a rage). Ridiculous ! ridiculous ! Is it my\nfault if France won't send us any more good comedies, and we are reduced\nputting on Pirandello's works, where nobody understands anything, and\nwhere the author plays the fool with us all ? {The actors grin. The Manager\ngoes to Leading Man and shouts)."}, {"page_pdf": 7, "page_imprimee": "188", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.7", "texte": "Yes sir, you put on the cook's cap and beat eggs. Do you suppose that\nwith all this egg-beating business you are on an ordinary stage ? Get that out\nof your head. You represent the shell of the eggs you are beating (Laughter\nand comments among the actors). Silence ! and listen to my explanations please.\n(to Leading Man). The empty form of reason without the fullness of instinct,\nwhich is blind. You stand for reason, your wife is instinct. It's a mixing up\nof the parts, according to which you who act your own part become the\npuppet of yourself. Do you understand ?\nIvEADiNG Man. I'm hanged if I do.\nThe Manager. Neither do I. But let's get on with it. It's sure to be a\nglorious failure anyway, (confidentially) But I say, please face three-quar-\nters Otherwise, what with the abstruseness of the dialogue, and the public\nthat won't be able to hear you, the whole thing will go to hell. Com.e on !\ncome on !\nPrompter. Pardon sir, may I get into my box ? There's a bit of a draught.\nThe Manager. Yes, yes.\nAt this point, the door-keeper has entered from the stage door and advances\ntowards the manager's table, taking off his braided cap. During this manoeuvre,\nthe Six Characters enter, and stop by the door at back of stage, so that when the door-\nkeeper is about to announce their coming to the Manager, they are already on the\nstage. A tenuous light surrounds them, almost as if irradiated by them — the faint\nbreath of their fantastic reality.\nThis light will disappear when they come forward towards the actors. They\npreserve, however, something of the dream lightness in which they seem almost\nsuspended, but this does not detract from the essential reality of their forms and\nexpressions.\nHe who is known as The Father is a man of about 50 : hair, thin at the temples,\nbut not bald, hair reddish in colour, and with thick moustaches, falling over his still\nfresh mouth, which often opens in an empty and uncertain smile. He is fattish,\npale; especially on his wide forehead. He has blue, oval-shaped eyes, very clear\nand piercing. Wears light trousers and a dark jacket. He is alternatively mell-\nifluous and violent in his manner.\nThe Mother seems crushed and terrified as if by an intolerable weight of\nshame and abasement. She is dressed in modest black and wears a thick widow s\nveil of crepe. When she lifts this, she reveals a wax-like face. She always keeps\n\\her eyes downcast.\nkj- The Step-Daughter, eighteen, is dashing, almost impudent, beautiful.\nKSfoe wears mourning too, but with great elegance. She shows contempt for the timid\nhalf-frightened manner of the wretched"}, {"page_pdf": 8, "page_imprimee": "189", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.8", "texte": "Boy (14 years old), also dressed in black. On the other hand, she displays\na lively tenderness for her little sister\nThe Chjxd (about four) dressed in white, with a black silk sash at the\nwaist.\nThe Son (22) tall, severe in his attitude of contempt for The Father, super-\ncilious and indifferent to the Mother. He looks as if he had come on the stage against\nhis will.\nDoor-keeper [cap in hand). Excuse me, sir.\nThe Manager [rudely). Eh ? What is it ?\nDoor-keeper [timidly). These people are asking for you, sir.\nThe Manager [furious). I am rehearsing, and you know perfectly well\nno one's allowed to come in during rehearsals [turning to the Characters). Who\nare you please ? What do you want ?\nThe Father [coming forward a little, followed by the others who seem embar-\nrassed) . As a matter of fact . . . we have come here in search of an author . . .\nThe Manager [half angry, half amazed). An author ? What author ?\nThe Father. Any author, sir.\nThe Manager. But there's no author here. We are not rehearsing a\nnew piece.\nThe Step-Daughter [vivaciously). So much the better, so much the better.\nWe can be your new piece.\nAn Actor [coming forward from the others). Oh, do you hear that ?\nThe Father [to Step-Daughter). Yes, but if the author isn't here [to\nManager). Unless you would be willing .. .\nThe Manager. You are trying to be funny.\nThe Father. No, for Heaven's sake, what are you saying ? We bring\nyou a drama, sir.\nThe Step-Daughter. We may be your fortune.\nThe Manager. Will you oblige me by going away. ? We haven't time to\nwaste with mad people.\nThe Father [mellifluously). Oh Sir, you know well that life is full of in-\nfinite absurdities, which, strangely enough, do not even need to appear plausible\nsince they are true.\nThe Manager. What the devil is he talking about ? \"\nThe Father. I say that to reverse the ordinary process may well be\nconsidered a madness : that is to create credible situations, in order that they\nmay appear true. But permit me to observe that if this be madness, it is the\nthe sole raison d'etre of your profession gentlemen (The actors look hurt and per-\nplexed) ."}, {"page_pdf": 9, "page_imprimee": "190", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.9", "texte": "The Manager [getting up and looking at him). So our profession seems to\nyou one worthy of madmen then ?\nThe Father. Well, to make seem true that which isn't true without\nany need, for a joke as it were .. . Isn't that your mission gentlemen : to\ngive life to fantastic characters on the stage ?\nThe Manager [interpreting the rising anger of the Company). But I would beg\nyou to believe, my dear Sir, that the profession of the comedian is a noble one.\nIf to-day, as things go, the playwrights give us stupid comedies to play and\npuppets to represent instead of men, remember we are proud to have given\nlife to immortal works here on these very boards (The actors, satisfied,\napplaud their Manager).\nThe Father [interrupting furiously). Exactly, perfectly, to living beings\nmore alive than those who breathe and wear clothes. Beings less real perhaps, but\ntruer. I agree with you entirely. [The actors look at one another in amaze-\nment) .\nThe Manager. But what do you mean ? Before you said .. .\nThe Father. No, excuse me, I meant it for you Sir, who were cry-\ning out that you had no time to lose with madmen, while no one better than\nyourself knows that nature uses the instrument of human fantasy in order to\npursue her high creative purpose.\nThe Manager. Very well. But where does all this take us ?\nThe Father. Nowhere. It is merely to show you that one is born\nto life in many forms, in many shapes, as tree, or as stone, as water,\nas butterfly, or as woman. So one may also be born a character in\na play.\nThe Manager [with feigned comic dismay). So you and these other friends\nof yours have been born characters ?\nThe Father. Exactly, and alive as you see [Manager and actors\nburst out laughing).\nThe Father [hurt). lam sorry you laugh, because we carry in us a drama,\nas you can guess from this woman here veiled in black.\nThe Manager [losing patience at last and almost indignant). Oh, chuck it!\nGet away please! Clear out of here! [to Property Man). For Heaven's\nsake turn them out!\nThe Father [resisting). No, no, look here, we .. .\nThe Manager [roaring). We come here to work you know.\nLeading Actor. One cannot let oneself be made such a fool of.\nThe Father [determined, coming forward). I at your incredu-\nlity, gentlemen. Are you not accustomed to see the characters created by an\nauthor spring to life in yourselves and face each other ? Just because there"}, {"page_pdf": 10, "page_imprimee": "191", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.10", "texte": "is no Book (pointing to the Prompter's box) which contains us, you refuse to be-\nlieve , . .\nThe Step-Daughter (advances towards Manager, smiling and coquettish).\nBelieve me, we are really six most interesting characters sir ; side-tracked\nhowever.\nThe Father. Yes, that is the word (to Manager all at once). In the sense,\nthat is, that the author who created us alive no longer wished or was no longer\nable materially to put us into a work of art. And this was a real crime sir,\nbecause he who has had the luck to be born a character can laugh even at\ndeath. He cannot die. The man, the writer, the instrument of the creation\nwill die, but his creation does not die. And to live for ever it does not need to\nhave extraordinary gifts or to be able to work wonders. Who was Sancho Panza ?\nWho was Don Abbondio ? Yet they live eternally because — live germs as\nthey .were — they had the fortune to find a fecundating matrix, a fantasy which\ncould raise and nourish them : make them live for ever. !\nThe Manager. That is quite all right. But what do you want here, all\nof you ?\nThe Father. We want to live.\nThe Manager (ironically). For Eternity?\nThe Father. No, sir, only for a moment in you.\nAn Actor. Just listen to him.\nLeading Lady. They want to live in us.\nJuvenile Lead (pointing to the Step-Daughter). I've no objection as\nfar as that one is concerned.\nThe Father. Look here ! look here ! The comedy has to be made.\n(to the Manager) But if you and your actors are willing, we can soon concert\nit among ourselves.\nThe Manager (annoyed). But what do you want to concert ? We\ndon't go in for concerts here. Here we play dramas and comedies !\nThe Father. Exactly. That is just why we have come to you.\nThe Manager. And where is the book ?\nThe Father. It is in us (The actors laugh). The drama is in us, and we\nare the drama. We are impatient to play it. Our inner passion drives us\non to this.\nThe Step-Daughter (disdainful, alluring, treacherous, full of impudence).\nMy passion, Sir, ah, if you only knew ! My passion for him ! (points to the\nFather and makes a pretence of embracing him. Then she breaks out into a loud\nlaugh).\nThe Father (angrily). Behave yourself ! And please don't laugh in that\nfashion."}, {"page_pdf": 11, "page_imprimee": "192", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.11", "texte": "The Step-Daughter. With your permission, gentlemen, I who am a\ntwo months orphan, will show you how I can dance and sing.\n(Sings and then dances Prenez garde a Tchou-Thin-Tehou).\nLes chinois sont un peuple malin,\nDe Shangai a Pekin,\nlis ont mis des ecriteux partout :\nPrenez garde a Tchou-Thin-Tchou.\nActors and Actresses. Bravo ! Well done ! Tip-top !\nThe Manager. Silence ! This isn't a cafe concert you know (iturning\nto the Father in consternation). Is she mad ?\nThe Father. Mad ? No, she's worse-than mad.\nThe Step-Daughter (to Manager). Worse! worse! Listen! Stage this\ndrama for us at once ! Then you will see that at a certain moment I-when\nthis little darling here (takes the Child by the hand and leads xher to the Manager).\nIsn't she a dear? (Takes her up and kisses her). Darling! Darling! (puts\nher down again and adds feelingly). Well, when God suddenly takes this dear\nlittle child away from that poor mother there, and this imbecile here (seizing\nhold of the Boy roughly and pushing him forward) does the stupidest things,\nlike the fool he is, you will see me run away. Yes, gentlemen, I shall be\noff. But the moment hasn't arrived yet. After what has taken place between\nhim and me, (indicates the Father with a horrible wink), I can't remain any\nlonger in this society to have to witness the anguish of this mother here\nfor that fool. . . (indicates the Son). Look at him ! at him ! See how\nindifferent, how frigid he is because he is the legitimate son. He despises me,\ndespises him (pointing to the Boy) despises this here because ... we are\nbastards (goes to the Mother and embraces her). And he doesn't want to recog-\nnize her as his mother, she who is the common mother of us all. He looks\ndown upon her as if she were only the mother of us three bastards. Wretch !\n(She says all this this very rapidly, excitedly. At the word \" bastards ~ she raises\nher voice, and almost spits out the final \" wretch /). ~\nThe Mother (to the Manager, in anguish). In the name of these two lit-\ntle children, I beg you . . . (She grows faint and is about to fall). Oh God !\nThe Father (coming forward to support her as do some of the actors) ! Quick „\na chair, a chair for this poor widow !\nThe Actors. Is it true ? Has she really fainted ?\nThe Manager. Quick, a chair here !\n(One of the actors brings a chair, the others proffer assistance. The Mother\ntries to prevent the Father from lifting the veil which covers her face).\nThe Father. Iyook at her ! Iyook at her !"}, {"page_pdf": 12, "page_imprimee": "193", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.12", "texte": "The Mother. No, no ; stop it please !\nThe Father (raising her veil). Let them see you !\nThe Mother (rising and covering her face with her hands, in desperation).\nI beg you Sir, to prevent this man from carrying out his plan which is loath-\nsome to me.\nThe Manager (dumbfounded). I don't understand at all. What is the\nsituation ? Is this lady your wife ? (to the Father).\nThe Father. Yes, gentlemen : my wife.\nThe Manager. But how can she be a widow if you are alive ? (The\nactors find relief for their astonishment in a loud laugh).\nThe Father. Don't laugh ! Don't laugh like that for Heaven's sake. Her\ndrama lies just here in this. She has had a lover,, a man who ought to\nbe here.\nThe Mother (with a cry). No ! No !\nThe Step-Daughter. Fortunately for her, he is dead. Two months\nago as I said. We are in mourning as you see.\nThe Father. He isn't here you see, not because he is dead. He isn't\nhere — look at her a moment and you will understand — because her drama\nisn't a drama of the love of two men for whom she was incapable of feeling\nanything excejjt possibly a little gratitude — not for me ; for the other. She\nisn't a woman, she is a mother, and her drama — powerful sir, I assure you —\nlies, as a matter of fact, all in these four children she has had by two men.\nThe Mother. I had them ? Have you got the courage to say that I\nwanted them ? It was his doing. It was he who gave me that other man,\nwho forced me to go away with him.\nThe Step-Daughter. It isn't true.\nThe Mother (startled). Not true, isn't it ?\nThe Step-Daughter. No, it isn't true, it just isn't true.\nThe Mother. And what can you know about it ?\nThe Step-Daughter. It isn't true. Don't believe it.(To Manager)\nDo you know why she says so ? For that fellow there (indicates the Son). She\ntortures herself, destroys herself on account of the neglect of that son there,\nand she wants him to believe that if she abandoned him when he was only\ntwo years old, it was because he (indicates the Father) made her do so.\nThe Mother (vigorously). He forced me to it, and I call God to witness\nit (to the Manager). Ask him (indicates husband) if it isn't true. Let him\nspeak ! You (to daughter) are not in a position to know anything about it.\nThe Step-Daughter. I know you lived in peace and happiness with\nmy father while he lived. Can you deny it ?\nThe Mother. No, I don't deny it .. ."}, {"page_pdf": 13, "page_imprimee": "194", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.13", "texte": "The Step-Daughter. He was always full of affection and kindness for\nyou (to the Boy, angrily). Its true, isn tit ? Tell them ! Why don t\nyou speak, you little fool ?\nThe Mother. Leave the poor boy alone ! Why do you want to make\nme appear ungrateful, daughter ? I don't want to offend .your father. I have\nanswered him that I didn't abandon my house and my son through any fault\nof mine, nor from any wilful passion.\nThe Father. It is true. It was my doing.\nLeading Man (to the Company). What a spectacle !\nLeading Lady. We are the audience this time.\nJuvenile Lead. For once in a way.\nThe Manager (beginning to get really interested). Let s hear them out.\nListen !\nThe Son. Oh yes, you're going to hear a fine bit now. He will talk\nto you of the Demon of Experiment.\nThe Father. You are a cynical imbecile. I've told you so already a\nhundred times (to the Manager). He tries to make fun of me on account of\nthis expression which I have found to excuse myself with.\nThe Son (with disgust). Yes, phrases! phrases!\nThe Father. Phrases. Isn't everyone consoled when faced with a\ntrouble or fact he doesn't understand, by a word, some simple word which tells\nus nothing and yet calms us ?\nThe Step-Daughter. Even in the case of remorse. In fact especially\nthen.\nThe Father. Remorse. No, that isn't true. I've done more than use\nwords to quieten the remorse in me.\nThe Step-Daughter. Yes, there was a bit of money too. Yes, yes, a bit\nof money. There were the hundred lire he was about to offer me in payment,\ngentlemen . . . (sensation of horror among the actors).\nThe Son (to the Step-Daughter). This is vile.\nThe Step-Daughter. Vile ? There they were in a pale blue envelope on\na little mahogany table in the back of Madame Pace's shop. You know Madame\nPace — one of those ladies who attract poor girls of good family i their ate-\nliers, under the pretext of their selling robes et manteaux.\nThe Son. And he thinks he has bought the right to tyrannise over us all\nwith those hundred lire he was going to pay ; but which, fortunately — n°te \"this\ngentlemen — he had no chance of paying.\nThe Step-Daughter. It was a near thing, though, you know ! (laughs\nironically).\nThe Mother (protesting). Shame, my daughter, shame !"}, {"page_pdf": 14, "page_imprimee": "195", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.14", "texte": "The Step-Daughter. Shame indeed ! This is my revenge ! lam dying\nto live that scene ... The room ... I see it .. . Here is the window with\nthe mantles exposed, there the divan, the looking-glass, a screen, there in front\nof the window the little mahogany table with the blue envelope containing one\nhundred lire. I see it. I see it. I could take hold of it. . . But you, gentle-\nmen, you ought to turn your backs now : lam almost nude, you know. But\nI don't blush : I leave that to him (indicating Father).\nThe Manager. I don't understand this at all.\nThe Father. Naturally enough. I would ask you, Sir, to exercise your\nauthority a little here, and let me speak before you believe all she is trying\nto blame me with. lyet me explain.\nThe Step-Daughter. Ah yes, explain it in your own way.\nThe Father. But don't you see that the whole trouble lies here. In\nwords, words. Each one of us has within him a whole world of things, each man\nof us his own special world. And how can we ever come to an understanding if\nI putin the words I utter the sense and value of things as I see them, while\nyou who listen to me must inevitably translate them according to the concep-\ntion of things each one of you has within himself ? We think we understand\neach other, but we never really do. Iyook here ! This woman {indicating\nthe Mother) takes all my pity for her as a specially ferocious form of cruelty.\nThe Mother. But you drove me away.\nThe Father. Do you hear her ? I drove her away. She believes I\nreally sent her away.\nThe Mother. You know how to talk, and I dont, but believe me Sir\n(to Manager) after he had married me .. . who knows why ?. . . I was a poor\ninsignificant woman . . .\nThe Father. But, good Heavens ! it was just for your humility that\nI married you. I loved this simplicity in you (He stops when he sees she makes\nsigns to contradict him, opens his arms wide in sign of desperation, seeing how\nhopeless it is to make himself understood). You see she denies it. Her mental\ndeafness, believe me is phenomenal, the limit (touches his forehead) deaf, deaf,\nmentally deaf. She has plenty of feeling. Oh yes, a good heart for the children\nbut the brain, deaf, to the point of desperation.\nThe Step-Daughter. Yes, but ask him how his intelligence has helped us.\nThe Father. If we could see all the evil that may spring from good,\nwhat should we do ? (At this point the Leading Lady who is biting her lips\nwith rage at seeing the Leading Man flirting with the Step-Daughter, comes forward\nand says to the Manager).\nIvEAding IyADY. Excuse me, but are we going to rehearse today ?\nManager. Of course, of course; but let's hear them out."}, {"page_pdf": 15, "page_imprimee": "196", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.15", "texte": "Juvenile IyEAD. This is something quite new.\nVlng&nue. Most interesting.\nLeading Yes, for the people who like that kind of thing (casts\na glance at Leading Man).\nThe Manager (to Father). You must please explain yourself quite clearly\n(sits down).\nThe Father. Very well then : listen. I had in my service a poor man, a\nclerk, a secretary of mine, full of devotion, who became friends with her (in-\ndicating the Mother). They understood one another, were kindred souls in fact,\nwithout, however, the least suspicion of any evil existing. They were incapable\neven of thinking of it.\nThe Step-Daughter. So he thought of it for them.\nThe Father. That's not true. I meant to do good to them and to myself,\nI confess, at the same time. Things had come to the point that I could not\nsay a word to either of them without their making a mute appeal, one to the\nother, with their eyes. I could see them silently asking each other how I was\nto be kept in countenance, how I was to be kept quiet. And this, believe\nme, was just about enough of itself to keep me in a constant rage, to exasperate\nme beyond measure.\nThe Manager. And why didn't you send him away then — this secretary\nof yours ?\nThe Father. Precisely what I did, Sir. And then I had to watch this\npoor woman drifting forlornly about the house like an animal without a master,\nlike an animal one has taken in out of pity.\nThe Mother. Ah yes .. . !\nThe Father (suddenly turning to the Mother). It's true about the son\nanyway, isn't it ?\nThe Mother. He took my son away from me first of all.\nThe Father. But not from cruelty. I did it so that he should grow up\nhealthy and strong by living in the country.\nThe Step-Daughter (pointing to him ironically). As one can see.\nThe Father (quickly). Is it my fault if he has grown up like this? I\nsent him to a wet nurse in the country, a peasant, as she did not seem to me\nstrong enough, though she is of humble origin. That was, anyway, the rea-\nson I married her. Unpleasant all this maybe, but how can it be helped?\nMy mistake possibly, but there we are ! All my life I have had these\nconfounded aspirations towards a certain moral sanity. (At this point the\nStep-Daughter bursts out into a noisy laugh). Oh, stop, it! Stop it! I can't\nstand it.\nThe Manager. Yes, please stop it, for Heaven's sake."}, {"page_pdf": 16, "page_imprimee": "197", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.16", "texte": "The Step-Daughter. But imagine moral sanity from him if you please,\nthe client of certain ateliers like that of Madame Pace.\nThe Father. Fool ! That is the proof that lam a man ! This seem-\ning contradiction, gentlemen, is the strongest proof that I stand here a live\nman before you. Why, it is just for this very incongruity in my nature that\nI have had to suffer what I have. I could not live by the side of that woman\n(',indicating the Mother) any longer, but not so much for the boredom she inspired\nme with as for the pity I felt for her.\nThe Mother. And so he turned me out.\nThe Father. Well provided for. Yes, I sent her to that man, gentle-\nmen ... to let her go free of me.\nThe Mother. And to free himself.\nThe Father. Yes, I admit it. It was also a liberation for me. But\ngreat evil has come of it. I meant well when I did it, and I did it more for her\nsake than mine. I swear it (crosses his arms on his chest ; then turns suddenly\nto the Mother). Did I ever lose sight of you until that other man carried you\noff to another town like the angry fool he was ? And on account of my pure\ninterest in you . . . my pure interest, I repeat, that had 110 base motive in it.\nI watched with the tenderest concern the new family that grew up around\nher. She can bear witness to this (;points to the Step-Daughter).\nThe Step-Daughter. Oh yes, that's true enough. When I was a kiddie,\nso so high, you know, with plaits over my shoulders and knickers longer than\nmy skirts, I used to see him waiting outside the school for me to come out.\nHe came to see how I was growing up.\nThe Father. This is infamous, shameful.\nThe Step-Daughter. No. Why ?\nThe Father. Infamous ! infamous ! (then excitedly to Manager explain-\ning). After she (indicating Mother) went away, my house seemed suddenfy\nempty. She was my incubus, but she filled my house. I was like a dazed\nfly alone in the empty rooms. This boy heie (indicating the Son) was educated\naway from home, and when he came back, he seemed to me to be no more\nmine. With no mother to stand between him and me, he grew up entirely for\nhimself, on his own, apart, with no tie of intellect or affection binding him\nto me. And then — strange but true — I was driven by curiosity at first and\nthen by some tender sentiment towards her family which had come into being\nthrough my will. The thought of her began gradually to fill up the emptiness\nI felt all around me. I wanted to know if she were happy in living out the\nsimple daily duties of life. I wanted to think of her as fortunate and happy\nbecause far away from the complicated torments of my spirit. And so, to\nhave proof of this, I used to watch that child coming out of school."}, {"page_pdf": 17, "page_imprimee": "198", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.17", "texte": "The Step-Daughter. Yes, yes. True. He used to follow me in the street\nand smiled at me, waved his hand like this. I would look at him with interest,\nwondering who he might be. I told my mother, who guessed at once (The\nMother agrees with a nod). Then she didn't want to send me to school for some\ndays, and when I finally went back, there he was again — looking so ridiculous\n— with a paper parcel in his hands. He came close to me, caressed me, and drew\nout a fine straw hat from the parcel with a bouquet of flowers — all for me.\nThe Manager. A bit discursive this you know.\nThe Son (<contemptuously). Literature ! Literature !\nThe Father. Literature indeed ! This is life, this is passion.\nThe Manager. It may be, but it won't act.\nThe Father. I agree. This is only the part leading up. I don't sug-\ngest this should be staged. She (pointing to the Step-Daughter) as you see, is\nno longer the flapper with plaits down her back.\nThe Step-Daughter. And the knickers showing below the shirt.\nThe Father. The drama is coming now Sir. Something new, complex,\nmost interesting.\nThe Step-Daughter. As soon as my father died .. .\nThe Father. There was absolute misery for them. They came back here,\nunknown to me. Through her stupidity (;pointing to the Mother). It is true\nshe can barely write her own name, but she could anyhow have got her daughter\nto write to me that they were in need. . . .\nThe Mother. And how was Ito divine all this sentiment in him ?\nThe Father. That, is exactly your mistake, never to have guessed\nany of my sentiments.\nThe Mother. After so many years apart, and all that had happened .. .\nThe Father. Was it my fault if that fellow carried you away ?It hap-\npened quite suddenly, for after he had obtained some job or other, I could\nfind no trace of them, and so not unnaturally, my interest in them dwindled. But\nthe drama culminated unforseen and violent on their return when I was im-\npelled by my miserable flesh that still lives ... Ah ! what misery, what\nwretchedness is that of the man who is alone and disdains debasing liaisons.\nNot old enough to do without women, and not young enough to go and look\nfor one without shame. Misery ! it's worse than misery. It's a horror, for no\nwoman can any longer give him love, and when a man feels this . . . One ought\nto do without you say. Yes, yes, I know. Each of us when he appears\nbefore his fellows is clothed in a certain dignity. But every man knows what\nunconfessable things pass within the secrecy of his own heart. One gives\nway to the temptation, only to rise from it again afterwards with a great\neagerness to reestablish one's dignity, as if it were a tombstone to place on the"}, {"page_pdf": 18, "page_imprimee": "199", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.18", "texte": "grave of one's shame, and a monument to hide and sign the memory of our\nweaknesses. Everybody's in the same case. Some folk haven't the courage to\nsay certain things, that's all.\nThe Step-Daughter. All appear to have the courage to do them though.\nThe Father. Yes, but in secret. Therefore, you want more courage to say these\nthings. Let a man but speak these things out, and folk at once label him a cynic.\nBut it isn't true. He is like all the others, better indeed, because he isn't afraid to\nreveal with the light of the intelligence the red shame of human bestiality on\nwhich most men close their eyes so as not to see it.\nWoman — for example — look at her case. She turns tantalizing inviting\nglances on you. You seize her. No sooner does she feel herself in your grasp\nthan she closes her eyes. It is the sign of her mission, the sign by which she\nsays toman : \" Blind yourself for I am blind. \"\nThe Step-Daughter. Sometimes she can close them no more : when\nshe no longer feels the need of hiding her shame to herself, but dry-eyed and\ndispassionately, sees only that of the man who has blinded himself without\nlove. Oh, all these intellectual complications make me sick, disgust me, all\nthis philosophy that uncovers the beast in man, and then seeks to save him,\nexcuse him ... I can't stand it Sir. When a man seeks to \" simplify\"\nlife bestially, throwing aside every relic of humanity, every chaste aspiration,\npure feeling, all sense of ideality, duty, modesty, shame .. . then nothing is\nmore revolting and nauseous than a certain kind of remorse — crocodiles'\ntears, that's what it is.\nThe Manager. Let's come to the point. This is only discussion.\nThe Father. Very good, Sir. But a fact is like a sack which won't\nstand up when it is empty. In order that it may stand up, one has to put into\nit the reason and sentiment which have caused it to exist. I couldn't possibly\nknow that after the death of that man, they had decided to return here, that\nthey were in misery, and that she (;pointing to the Mother) had gone to work\nas a modiste, and at a shop of the type of that of Madame Pace.\nThe Step-Daughter. A real high class modiste you must know gentlemen.\nIn appearance, she works for the leaders of the best society, but she arranges\nmatters so that these elegant ladies serve her purpose. . . . without prejudice\nto other ladies who are well. . . only so so.\nThe Mother. You will believe me, gentlemen, that it never entered my\nmind that the old hag offered me work because she had her eye on my daughter.\nThe Step-Daughter. Poor mamma! Do you know, Sir, what that\nwoman did when I brought her back the work my mother had finished ? She would\npoint out to me that I had torn one of my frocks, and she would give it back\nto my mother to mend. It was I who paid for it, always I, while this poor"}, {"page_pdf": 19, "page_imprimee": "200", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.19", "texte": "creature here believed she was sacrificing herself for me and these two children\nhere, sitting up at night sewing Madame Pace's robes.\nThe Manager. And one day you met there .. .\nThe Step-Daughter. Him, him. Yes Sir, an old client. There's a\nscene for you to play. Superb !\nThe Father. She, the Mother arrived just then .. .\nThe Step-Daughter (treacherously). Almost in time.\nThe Father (crying out). No, in time !in time ! Fortunately I recognized\nher in time. And I took them back home with me to my house. You can\nimagine now her position and mine. She, as you see her, and I who cannot\nlook iher in the face.\nThe Step-Daughter. Absurd ! How can I possibly be expected to be\na modest young miss \" after ...\" a fit person to go with his confounded aspira-\ntions for \"a solid moral sanity \" ?\nThe Father. For the drama lies all in this — in the conscience that I\nhave, that each one of us has. We believe this conscience to be a single thing,\nbut it is many-sided. There is one for this person, and another for that. Di-\nverse consciences. So we have this illusion of being one person for all, of having\na personality that is unique in all our acts. But it isn't true. We perceive\nthis when, tragically perhaps, in something we do, we are as it were, suspended,\ncaught up in the air on a kind of hook. Then we perceive that all of us was not\nin that act, and that it would be an atrocious injustice to judge us by that\naction alone, as if all our existence were summed up in that one deed. Now\ndo you understand the perfidy of this girl ? She surprised me in a place,\nwhere she ought not to have known me, just as I could not exist for her,\nand she now seeks to attach to me a reality such as I could never suppose I\nshould have to assume for her in a shameful and fleeting moment of my life.\nI feel this above all else. And the drama, you will see, acquires a tremendous\nvalue from this point. Then there is the position of the others . . . his .. .\n(indicating the Son).\nThe Son (shrugging his shoulders scornfully). me alone ! I don't\ncome into this.\nThe Father. What ? You don't come into this ?\nThe Son. I've got nothing to do with it, and don't want to have, because\nyou know well enough I wasn't made to be mixed up in all this with the rest\nof you.\nThe Step-Daughter. We are only vulgar folk ! He is the fine gentleman.\nYou may have noticed, Mr. Manager, that I fix him now and again with a look\nof scorn while he lowers his eyes — for he knows the evil he has done me.\nThe Son (scarcely looking at her). I ?"}, {"page_pdf": 20, "page_imprimee": "201", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.20", "texte": "2\n\nThe Step-Daughter. You ! you! I owe my life on the streets to yoti.\nDid you or did you not deny us with your behaviour, I won't say the intimacy\nof home, but even that mere hospitality which makes guests feel at their\nease. We were intruders who had come to disturb the kingdom of your legit-\nimacy. I should like to have you witness, Mr. Manager , certain scenes between\nhim and me. He says I have tyrannized over everyone. But it was just his\nbehaviour which made me insist on the reason for which I had come into the\nhouse, — this reason he calls \" vile \" — into his house with my mother who is his\nmother too. And I came as mistress of the house.\nThe Son. It's easy for them to put me always in the wrong. But imagine,\ngentlemen, the position of a son, whose fate it is to see arrive one day at his\nhome a young woman of impudent bearing, a young woman who inquires\nfor his father, with whom who knows what business she has. This young man\nhas then to witness her return bolder than ever, accompanied by that child\nthere. He is obliged to watch her treat his father in an equivocal and confi-\ndential manner. She asks money of him in a way that lets one suppose he\nmust give it her, must, do you understand, because he has every obligation\nto do so.\nThe Father. But I have, as a matter of fact, this obligation. I owe\nit to your mother.\nThe Son. How should I know ? When had I ever seen or heard of her ?\nOne day there arrive with her (lindicating Step-Daughter) that lad and this baby\nhere. lam told : \"This is your mother too, you know. \" I divine from\nher manner [indicating Step-Daughter again) why it is they have come home.\nI had rather not say what I feel and think about it. I shouldn't even care to\nconfess to myself. No action can therefore be hoped for from me in this affair.\nBelieve me, Mr. Manager, I am an \" unrealized \" character, dramatically speak-\ning, and I find myself not at all at ease in their company. lyeave me out of\nit, I beg you.\nThe Father. What ? It is just because you are so that. . .\nThe Son. How do you know what I am like ? When did you ever\nbother your head about me ?\nThe Father. I admit it. I admit it. But isn't that a situation in itself ?\nThis aloofness of yours which is so cruel to me and your mother who returns\nhome and sees you almost for the first time grown up, who doesn't recognize\nyou but knows you are her son . . . (pointing out the Mother to the Manager).\nSee, she's crying !\nThe Step-Daughter (angrily, stamping her foot). Iyike a fool!\nThe Father (indicating Step-Daughter). She can't stand him you know\n(then referring again to the Son). She says he doesn't come into the affair, whereas"}, {"page_pdf": 21, "page_imprimee": "202", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.21", "texte": "he is really the hinge of the whole action. Look at that lad who is always\nclinging to his mother, frightened and humiliated. It is on account of this\nfellow here. Possibly his situation is the most painful of all. He feels himself\na stranger more than the others. The poor little chap feels mortified,\nhumiliated at being brought into a home out of charity as it were {in confidence).\nHe is the image of his father. Hardly talks at all. Humble and quiet.\nThb Managkr. Oh, we'll cut him out. You've no notion what a nui-\nsance boys are on the stage. . . .\nThe Father. He disappears soon, you know. And the baby too. She\nis the first to vanish from the scene. The drama consists finally in this : when\nthat mother re-enters my house, her family born outside of it, and\nshall we say superimposed on the original, ends with the death of the little\ngirl, the tragedy of the boy and the flight of the elder daughter. It cannot\ngo on, because it is foreign to its surroundings. So after much torment, we\nthree remain : I, the mother, that son. Then, owing to the disappearance\nof that extraneous family, we too find ourselves strange to one another. We\nfind we are living in an atmosphere of mortal desolation which is the revenge,\nas he (indicating Son) scornfully said of the Demon of Experiment, that unfor-\ntunately hides in me. Thus, Sir, you see when faith is lacking, it becomes\nimpossible to create certain states of happiness, for we lack the necessary humility.\nVaingloriously, we try to substitute ourselves for this faith, creating thus for\nthe rest of the world a reality which we believe after their fashion, while, actually,\nit doesn't exist. For each one of us has his own reality to be respected before\nGod, even when it is harmful to one's self.\nThe Manager. There is something in what you say. I assure you all\nthis interests me very much. I begin to think there's the stuff for a drama in\nall this, and not a bad drama either.\nThe Step-Daughter (coming forward). When you've got a character\nlike me.\nThe Father (shutting her up, all excited to learn the decision of the Man-\nager). You be quiet !\nThe Manager (;reflecting, heedless of interruption). It's new. . . hem .. .\nyes. . .\nThe Father. Absolutely new!\nThe Manager. You've got a nerve though, I must say, to come here\nand fling it at me like this ....\nThe Father. \\ou will understand, Sir, born as we are for the stage .. .\nThe Manager. Are you amateur actors then ?\nThe Father. No. I say born for the stage, because .. .\nThe Manager. Oh, nonsense. You're an old hand, you know."}, {"page_pdf": 22, "page_imprimee": "203", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.22", "texte": "The Father. No, Sir, no. We act that role for which we have been\ncast, that role which we are given in life. And in my own case, passion itself,\nas usually happens, becomes a trifle theatrical when it is exalted.\nThe Manager. Well, well, that will do. But you see, without an author\n... I could give you the address of an author if you liked . . .\nThe Father. No, no. Look here ! You must be the author.\nThe Manager. I ? What are you talking about ?\nThe Father. Yes, you, you. Why not ?\nThe Manager. Because I have never been an author: that's why.\nThe Father. Then why not turn author now ? Everybody does it.\nYou don't want any special qualities. Your task is made much easier by the\nfact that we are all here alive before you . . .\nThe Manager. It won't do.\nThe Father. What ? When you see us live our drama .. .\nThe Manager. Yes, that's all right. But you want someone to write it.\nThe Father. No, no. Someone to take it down possibly while we play\nit, scene by scene. It will be enough to sketch it out at first, and then try it\nover.\nThe Manager. Well. . . lam almost tempted. It's a bit of an idea.\nOne might have a shot at it.\nThe Father. Of course. You'll see what scenes will come out of it. I\ncan give you one at once . . .\nThe Manager. By Jove, it tempts me. I'd like to have a go at it.\nLet's try it out. Come with me to my office (turning to the Actors). You\nare at liberty for a bit, but don't stop out of the theatre for long. In a quarter\nof an hour, twenty minutes all back here again (to the Father). We'll see what\ncan be done. Who knows if we don't get something really extraordinary out\nof it ?\nThe Father. There's no doubt about it. They (indicating the Characters)\nhad better come with us too, hadn't they ?\nThe Manager. Yes, yes. Come on ! come on ! (moves away and then\nturning to the actors). Be punctual please. (Manager and the Six Characters\ncross the stage and go off. The other actors remain, looking at one another in astonish-\nment).\nLeading Man. Is he serious ? What the devil does he want to do ?\nJuveniee Lead. This is rank madness.\nThird Actor. Does he expect to knock up a drama in five minutes ?\nJuveniee Lead. Like the improvisers.\nLeading Lady. If he thinks I'm going to take part in a joke like this . .\nJuvenieE Lead. I'm out of it anyway."}, {"page_pdf": 23, "page_imprimee": "204", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.23", "texte": "Fourth Actor. I should like to know who they are (alludes to Charac-\nters).\nThird Actor. What do you suppose ? Madmen or rascals.\nIyEAD. And he takes them seriously.\nI/Ing£nue. Vanity. He fancies himself as an author now.\nIvBADiNG Man. It's absolutely unheard of. If the stage has come to\nthis .. . well I'm .. .\nFifth Actor. It's rather a joke.\nThird Actor. Well, we'll see what's going to happen next.\n{Thus talking, the actors leave the stage ; some going out by the little door at\nthe back ; others retiring to their dressing-rooms.\nThe curtain remains up.\nThe action of the play is suspended for twenty minutes).\nThe dramatic rights of Signor Pirandello*s comedy Six Characters in Search of an Author\nare secured for the following countries : U. S. of America, England, France, Holland, Germ-\nany and Hungary in all of which the play will be produced this year.\n\nLuigi Pirandello\n(Translated By Edward Storer)"}, {"page_pdf": 24, "page_imprimee": "205", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.24", "texte": "A LAST WORD\nYou are lying under coffin glass today.\nSo soon !\nIt seems we must have run\ntrhough all the days,\nbreathlessly,\nto be here — so soon.\nAnd the winds that sped with us\ndown the slanting roads —\nthey huddle back. ,\nThe motion, the tending,\nthe flight —\nstill like stars in deep water.\nTo-night you keep your tryst\nwith earth.\nWill you remember —\nin the vast ecstasies of silence —\nwill you remember that other night\nin April ?\nAnd remembering, will the cool dark\nthrill for you\nas quiet waters thrill\nat gold finch flight above them ?\nOh, you must remember !\nCan you hear me whisper it again —\ncan you —\nagainst your coffin glass ?"}, {"page_pdf": 25, "page_imprimee": "206", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.25", "texte": "HEDGES\nHenry Bellaman\nHedges have good manners . . .\nimposing order . . .\nThings grow straight\nand keep in place\nand breeds don't mix.\nWhite buds stay white\nand red stay red\nwith no indecent streaking\nin the flower.\nCedars have room\nto shape themselves rotundly . . .\nThere are shears for vines\nthat rise by easy handholds.\nBut even a garden remembers . . .\nremembers the thick choking,\nthe strangling climbers\nblossoming scarlet above tense quivers.\nOh, the long straight rise to the sun !\nOh, the rough winds from the snows !\nthe trampling,\nthe crowding,\nthe wild sap,\nthe unhampered seeding 1\nHedges have good manners . . .\nthings grow straight in rows.\nWeak things bloom free —\ncertain slow and strong things\nwait the gardener's passing."}, {"page_pdf": 26, "page_imprimee": "207", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.26", "texte": "JACQUES LIPCHITZ AND MY PORTRAIT BUST\n\nThe critics have never been able to remove a hair from my head, but\nIyipchitz has decapitated me . This is how the thing was done. I passed one\nhour every day on a platform, held rigid by the mortal cold which radiates from\nstone blocks and falls from the slanting window panes like a meat chopper.\nI buried my feet in sabots, my body in shawls and an old army coat; my head\npale, as a convicted prisoner's, emerging from the disorder.\nThe cold hypnotized me and gave me the strange feeling of surgical opera-\ntions. Thus I found myself rigid and without strength, ready to submit to the\nexperiment. The problem was to combine light and shade in my likeness, not\nby copying my face and then simplifying it, nor by deforming it afterwards on\nthe pretext of style.\nI have seen the unbelievable patience necessary for taming light and bring-\ning it within arm's reach. The task is simple enough ;it only consists in build-\ning a trap. Then the sculptor or hunter has no further worry. He lies in wait\nfor the light, cajoles it, frightens it; bullies it, using all the means by which one\ntames the most nervous animals.\nBut though Iyipchitz, after having completely renounced the sphere —\nwhich is the dormant force and epitome of the Greek ideal — rediscovered the\nskeleton of architecture and recreated about it a new flesh that has, shall we\nsay, nothing of the human figure, he yet considers the portrait bust as an ex-\nceptional problem.\nHe avoids the monstrous. His figures, like certain painted effigies of Pic-\nasso, no longer repel as being caricatured humanity. They give us an image\nof the truer than the true, the real aim of the contemporary artist when he does\nnot limit himself to simple decorative experiments.\nSculpture is an austere art. Painting is still a simulacrum. It hides its\nnakedness under rich colours."}, {"page_pdf": 27, "page_imprimee": "208", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.27", "texte": "Lipchitz\nJean Cocteau"}, {"page_pdf": 28, "page_imprimee": "209", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.28", "texte": "The public likes to have a role reserved for it. Cubism already displeased\nit on account of the small opportunity it left for the collaboration of the\nspectator amused by the drawings.\nThink of the courage of the sculptor. What are his artifices ? In the case of\nLipchitz, I shall point out two. The first is to distribute his masses in such a\nway that the statue unfolds like a fa£ade. Mere curiosity will move the beholder\nto look behind. The second artifice is that the statue has a spiral development,\nand obliges the onlooker to go all round it. Thus the necessarily stable work —\nsince Iyipchitz renounces the trick of L'homme qui marche — will benefit by the\ndynamism which this manoeuvre awakens in the beholder.\nA trifling artifice compared with those which-painters, musicians and poets\nuse without the slightest dishonesty.\nMany artists of our group, born to be audacious, cherish certain routines.\nAnd it is in trying them and coming to grief with them that they obtain their\ncharm. Chance perfumes these seductive works. Lipchitz, on the contrary,\nis consciousness itself. He goes where he wants to go. The beauty of what he\nis working at crowns his calculations. How may times have I seen him made\nill when an indiscreet lady visitor has been looking for the likeness in one of\nhis guitarists — regular buildings inhabited from top to bottom by a soul.\nTherefore a fresh problem presents itself to Iyipchitz the portraitist, since\nhe never does things by halves. Neither the cast, the stylization nor the mon-\nstrousness. What remains ? A hunt for light more difficult than writing differ-\nent sentences with the right and left hand. A terrible hunt with all kinds of\nsmall arms, silences, unheard of halts.\nThe two quarries draw near light first. It lies down and allows itself to\nbe caressed. After comes likeness.\nThe capture of likeness was a very long affair. Brusquely, like the effect\nof a drug on the organism, it came from all sides. It was captured. And the\nday in which the two savage beasts understood each other to perfection and\nbecame domestic animals, Iyipchitz decapitated me.\n\nJean Cocteau"}, {"page_pdf": 29, "page_imprimee": "210", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.29", "texte": "IMPROVISATIONS : LIGHTS AND SNOW\n\nI.\nThe girl in the rocm beneath\nBefore going to bed\nStrums softly on a mandolin\nThe three simple tunes she knows.\nHow inadequate they are to tell what her heart feels !\nWhen she has finished them several\nShe thrums the strings softly with her fingernails\nAnd smiles, and thinks happily of many things.\nII.\nI stood for a long while before the shop window\nLooking at the blue butterflies embroidered on tawny silk.\nThe building was a tower before me,\nTime was loud behind me,\nSun went over the housetops and dusty trees.\nAnd there they were, glistening, brilliant, motionless,\nStitched in a golden sky\nBy yellow patient fingers long since turned to dust.\nIII.\nOn the day when my uncle and I drove to the cemetery\nRain rattled on the roof of the carriage ;\nAnd talking constrainedly of this and that\nWe refrained from looking at the child's coffin on the seat before us."}, {"page_pdf": 30, "page_imprimee": "211", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.30", "texte": "When we reached the cemetery,\nWe found that the thin snow on the grass\nWas already half transparent with rain,\nAnd boards had been laid upon it\nSo that we might walk without wetting our feet\nIV.\nWhen I was a boy, and saw bright rows of icicles\nIn many lengths along a wall,\nI was disappointed to find\nThat I could not play music upon them :\nIran my fingers lightly across them\nAnd they fell, tinkling.\nI tell you this, young man, so that your expectations\nOf life will not be too great.\nV.\nIt is now two hours since I left you,\nAnd the perfume of your hands is still on my hands.\nAnd though, since then,\nI have looked at the stars, walked in the cold blue streets,\nAnd heard the dead leaves blowing over the ground\nUnder the trees,\nI still remember the sound of your laughter. . .\nHow will it be, lady, when there is none to remember you\nEven as long as this ?\nWill the dust braid your hair ?\nVI.\nThe day opens with the brown light of snowfall\nAnd past the window snowflakes fall and fall.\nI sit in my chair all day and work and work"}, {"page_pdf": 31, "page_imprimee": "212", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.31", "texte": "Measuring words against each other.\nI open the piano and play a tune\nBut find it does not say what I feel,\nI grow tired of measuring delicate words against each other,\nI grow tired of these four walls,\nAnd I think of you, who write me that you have just had a daughter,\nAnd named her after your first sweetheart;\nAnd you, who break your heart, far away,\nIn the dullness and savagery of a long war ;\nAnd you, who, worn by the bitterness of winter,\nWill- soon go South . . .\nThe snowflakes fall almost straight in the brown light\nPast my window,\nAnd a sparrow finds refuge on my window-ledge.\nThis alone comes to me out of the world outside\nAs I measure word with word.\nVII.\nMany things perplex me and leave me troubled,\nMany things are locked away in the white book of stars\nNever to be opened by me.\nThe starred leaves are silently turned,\nAnd the mooned leaves ;\nAnd as they are turned fall the shadows of life and death. . .\nPerplexed and troubled,\nI light a small light in a small room,\nThe lighted walls come closer to me,\nThe familiar pictures are clear.\nI sit in my favourite chair and turn in my mind\nThe tiny pages of my own life, whereon so little is written,\nAnd hear at the eastern window the pressure of a long wind, coming\nFrom I know not where.\nHow many times have I sat here,\nHow many times will I sit here again,\nThinking these same things over and over in solitude\nAs a child says over and over\nThe first word he has learned to say !"}, {"page_pdf": 32, "page_imprimee": "213", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.32", "texte": "VIII.\nThis girl gave her heart to me,\nAnd this, and this ;\nThis one looked at me as if she loved me,\nAnd silently walked away.\nThis one I saw once, and loved, and saw her never again.\nShall I count them for you upon my fingers ?\nOr like a priest solemnly sliding beads ?\nOr pretend they are roses, pale pink, yellow, and white,\nAnd arrange them for you in a wide bowl\nTo be set in sunlight ?\nSee how nicely it sounds as I count them for you —\n' This girl gave her heart to me,\nAnd this, and this ! . . '\nAnd nevertheless my heart breaks when I think of them\nWhen I think their names,\nAnd how, like leaves, they have changed and blown\nAnd will lie at last, pitifully forgotten,\nUnder the snow.\nIX.\nIt is night-time, and cold, and snow is falling,\nAnd no wind grieves the walls.\nIn the small circle of light around the arc-lamp\nA swarm of snow-flakes falls and falls.\nThe street grows silent. The last stranger passes,\nAnd the sound of his feet in the snow is indistinct.\nWhat old sadness is it, on a night like this,\nTakes possession of my heart ?\nWhy do I think of a camellia tree in a southern garden\nWith pink blossoms among dark leaves,\nStanding surprised in the snow ?\nAnd why do I think of spring ?"}, {"page_pdf": 33, "page_imprimee": "214", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.33", "texte": "The snowflakes, delicately veering,\nFall silently past my window;\nThey come from darkness and enter darkness.\nWhat is it in my heart is surprised and bewildered\nLike that camellia tree,\nBeautiful\" still in its glittering anguish ? . . .\nAnd spring so far away !\nX.\nAs I walked through the lamplit gardens\nOn the thin white crust of snow\nSo intensely was I thinking of my misfortune,\nSo clearly were my eyes fixed\nOn the face of this grief which has come to me,\nThat I did not notice the beautiful pale coloring\nOf lamplight on the snow;\nNor the interlaced long blue shadows of trees ;\nAnd yet these things were there,\nAnd the white lamps, and orange lamps, and lamps of lilac were there,\nAs I have seen them so often before ;\nAs they will be so often again\nLong after my grief is forgotten.\nAnd still, though I know this, and say this, it cannot console me.\nXI.\nHow many times have we been interrupted\nJust as I was about to make up a story for you ! . . .\nOne time it was because we suddenly saw a firefly\nlighting his green lantern among the boughs of a fir-tree.\nMarvellous ! marvellous ! He is making for himself\nA little tent of light in the darkness ! . . .\nAnd one time it was because we saw a lilac lightning-flash\nRun wrinkling into the blue top of a mountain, —"}, {"page_pdf": 34, "page_imprimee": "215", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.34", "texte": "We heard boulders of sound rolling down upon us,\nAnd the plat-plat of drops on the window,\nAnd we ran to watch the rain\nCharging in wavering white clouds across the long grass of the field. .\nOr at other times it was because we saw a star\nSlipping easily out of the sky, and falling, far off,\nAmong pine-dark hills ;\nOr because we found a crimson evet\nDarting in the cold grass !—\nThese things interrupted us, and left us wondering ;\nAnd the stories, whatever they might have been,\nWere never told.\nA fairy binding a daisy down and laughing ?\nA golden-haired princess caught in a cobweb ?\nA love-story of long ago ? . .\nSome day, just as we are beginning again,\nJust as we blow the first sweet note,\nDeath itself will interrupt us.\nXII.\nIyike an old tree uprooted by the wind\nAnd flung down cruelly\nWith roots bared to the sun and stars,\nAnd fading leaves brought to earth —\nTorn from its house —\n. So do I seem to myself\nWhen you have left me.\n\nConrad Aiken"}, {"page_pdf": 35, "page_imprimee": "216", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.35", "texte": "Lipchitz\nSculpture"}, {"page_pdf": 36, "page_imprimee": "217", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.36", "texte": "Lipchitz\nSculpture"}, {"page_pdf": 37, "page_imprimee": "218", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.37", "texte": "THE TECHNIQUE OF JACQUES LIPCHITZ\nAt the beginning of his career Jacques Iyipchitz executed works which\nwere distinguished by their artistic maturity. With rapid strides he advanced to-\nwards that complete grasp of form which is the final aim of all artists haunted\nby the ideal of perfection. Enamoured of harmony, he eliminated anatomic\ndetails, simplified his technique and circumscribed his figures within the limits\nof the oval or the sphere. He seemed thus to conform to the principles which\ngovern modern sculpture in France, and cultivated with rare skill those artisan\nvirtues which have sufficed to place among the masters a large number of second\nrate artists. But as soon as he foresaw the danger to his art from the break-\ning up of the plastic equilibrium, Jacques Iyipchitz attempted a rehabilitation.\nTo the spherical form, which was the essential basis of his work, he added the\ncubic formula. Iyight, hitherto distributed gradually over the volumes, mo-\ndulated like painted surfaces, now exaggerates the differentiation of the planes\nin space. In eliminating from his works the spherical forms which might lessen\nthe specifically spatial character of his sculpture, Iyipchitz expresses depth, not\nby movement but by contrast of direction. His art is objective and self-suffi-\ncient. It excludes all sentimental relation between the statue and the specta-\ntor. It is characterized by the preponderance of the cubic element. The her-\nmetic character of Iyipchitz has been much discussed. Are the statues dehu-\nmanized a priori and stripped of all emotional content ? We do not think so.\nBut the artist, having decided to construct arhitectural unities, found it neces-\nsary to convert into uniform plastic elements the constituent parts of the hetero-\ngenous bodies which he represented. Thus the hair, the flesh, and the draperies\nof a stone woman, instead of being differentiated realistically, form an homogenous\norganism, determined by the laws of the medium out of which they are created.\nEach fragment of such a work though incorporated in the whole, has assigned to\nit a special r6le independent of its representative value. On the other hand, this\nprinciple of economy imposes on the artist certain constructive processes such as\nthe interpenetration of adjoining planes, whose object is to reduce to the minimum\nrepetitions in the body. In binding contiguous masses Jacques Iyipchitz achieves\norganic unity. The need for full expression has always been one of his gravest\npreoccupations.\nIyipchitz's statues mean nothing but themselves. They are accessible only\nto those who show themselves capable of disassociating the plastic from the re-\npresentative element, those who appreciate a work of art exclusively for arti-\nstic reasons. «"}, {"page_pdf": 38, "page_imprimee": "219", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.38", "texte": "Lipchitz\nSculpture"}, {"page_pdf": 39, "page_imprimee": "220", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.39", "texte": "MURDER\n\nAt the hall's one end two doors, dim with the light that came through\nwired glass : making of all a cross with black tree, short luminous arms.\nNow at one moment the two doors opened. 'Two women closed them and\nstood, shadows against frail light, looked at each other.\nEach thought:\n\" She too is going to have a child ! \"\nThe tall woman smiled, the smile spoke.\n\" I have not seen you before. We just moved in. \"\nThe short woman smiled, but her smile was in the dark . . .\nThey walked down stairs feeling each other's steps. The short stout\nwoman, careful of her steps, she was shy. She felt in her back this other —\nnot like her name she had read on the vestibule plate .. . Breddan. — She\ndon't seem Irish. The front door let them out. Sunshine vibrant and shrill,\nfull of motes, full of wagons and dirt and children and themselves dancing\nthere against the dark house and each other. The tall woman faced her. —\nShe is lovely, she is like her voice , . .\nI.\nAnna Suchy opened her door. Sophie Breddan stood still against the little\nwoman's silence, she understood it : she came in. Anna was thinking .. .\noften since their first moment she had thought — I wonder, could she like me ?\nWe are both Czech. But she is married to a swell Irish politician, my Michael's\na Subway guard : I wonder, could she like me ?\n\" Will you mind coming this way ? \" She led Sophie Breddan back to\na dim kitchen : brown wall paper sucked away its light. She did not say that\ntheir front light room was always rented to Mr. Kandro.\n\" I hope I am not disturbing you, \" said Sophie.\n\" O no, I am sewing. \"\n\" I brought mine along too. We can sew together. \""}, {"page_pdf": 40, "page_imprimee": "221", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.40", "texte": "Often they sewed together . . .\nSophie's flat was all hers — just her man and hers. It was full of light.\nNext door on that side was the empty lot and the windows had sun, not alley.\nIt was finer in Sophie's apartment. But Sophie never said, having once just\nstopped from saying : \" Come over always, Anna. The light's so much better. \"\nThey exchanged visits.\nTheir men did not count : they did not speak of their men. Anna was\nafraid of meeting an Irish politician : Sophie had no feel of the being of Michael\nSuchy. It was not these things. Simply, they looking at one another, feeling\nthe sacrament of their own life in one another, feeling themselves so, their\nmen did not count.\nThey were not solemn, feeling herself in the other. They were like trees in\nthe Spring, giving forth blossom. So Anna chattered. She sat there plump, far\nback in her rocker, rocking. Her feet did not touch the floor when she leaned\nfar back and chattered. White stockings brimmed over the wrinkled shoes.\nThey were like her chatter. Above them a grey dress : a round bare flat face\nwith blue eyes, sharp like her chattering that came from a silence in her, solid\nand sure like her grey-covered body. Sophie sat at her sewing machine : while\nAnna chattered, listening she hummed. Naked arms, thin, very long upon the\nwood and the white cloth. Black hair drawn tight and knotted to the neck.\nIyips full against her slender all, 'red lips upon paleness: lips clear and blooded\nas if fine steel had chiselled their edge.\nSophie turned her face, unmoving her naked arms: then Anna saw her\neyes like slow fires buried within a snow at night. Sophie worked and hummed :\nAnna felt her eyes. — She likes me, she likes me ... In knowledge of that,\nAnna chattered like an infant at play in a warm high crib.\nSophie went to bed.\nThere was a doctor : two doctors : three ... A trained nurse. A husband\nfluttering ever near, unapproachable, unapproached, like flesh of a man caught\nin a moving wheel. . . There was a dead child.\nSophie lay on, at the wheel's center/still: J drop by drop life that had\ngushed from her crawled hesitant back.\nShe could reach out a hand, take another hand and press it, press almost\na smile to her lips — not her eyes yet. She could feel sorry for her man, and\nsuffer for him, feel her suffering not enough for his, and stroke at last quite"}, {"page_pdf": 41, "page_imprimee": "222", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.41", "texte": "naturally his pain as she must have her child's misery who was dead. She\nwas able to ask for Anna. Then Anna went to bed.\nAnna's child was a girl. . . seven pounds .. . Hilda. Sophie lying grey\nin her bright room knew how Hilda had come into that dark other flat as the\nSun always noiselessly into her own. There was night, there was day : so\neasily.\nShe placed her cool hands on her hot eyes, over her face. So she lay,\nbehind and yet within herself. Swaying. Swaying within her arms and\nslender hands. She had a sense of her man in the other room, sitting in a chair\nand trying to reason.\n\"We must be sensible, \" she was sure he said to himself. Sensible. His\nboyish face was less ruddy, his lips she knew were a little twisted. Twisted and\npale with being sensible. There were diagonal furrows on his brow with being\nsensible. His nails were bitten to the quick with being sensible. He was all\ntortured and out of himself with being calm there, sensible. Sophie stretched\nher body very long in her hot bed, down to where it was cooler : she forgot\nVictor. She stretched her feet, lying upon her back, in order to be longer. She\nwas sudden at peace. Her arms were at her side, very flat: her palms lay up-\nward upon each side of her face. Her face and her palms looked upward. Her\nlips were parted. Her face and palms, her mouth looked upward : her face\nand her mouth were warm with happy tears.\n\" I will be strong — right away — very soon. Next time it will be\ngood : go well. \" She slept.\\\nVictor Breddan sat tense in his chair and summarized the talk he\nhad had with Doctor Lacey. He sat very tense at work, making up his\nmind.\nThis was a blow and he resented it. He did not' know,* but he resented\nSophie who had brought it upon him. An unknown unsought, gaugeless ele-\nment, his resenting, to merge in the making up his mind.\nVictor was very young, successful. He was the Confidential Clerk of Su-\npreme Court Justice Targett, and Justice Targett too was young for one in his\nposition, ambitious for more position. He liked Victor, Victor knew .. . and\nthere was a high way before them they must travel together. Victor sat very\nstill in his chair, and leaned on the vision that was easily his, as if it had been\nhimself, of Justice Targett writing a Decision.\nIt was impossible to bring the Doctor to a commitment. — \" I do not\nknow, I cannot say... whether Mrs. Breddan should be again subjected to child-\nbirth. \". . . There was a risk, and yet perhaps this was a mere mischance.\nOne can't be sure .. . one cannot be too careful. She 'is young, healthy .. .\nAnd yet there's a risk . . Always, perhaps ? Better wait .. . The Doctor"}, {"page_pdf": 42, "page_imprimee": "223", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.42", "texte": "did not feel he could be responsible :. . why not let matters drift for a while ?\nwas the retreat of the Doctor.\nVictor had ideas of his own. The vaguenesses of Doctor came into\nthe form of them like a gas, and filled them. Victor sat there, filling his mind\nthat was already a form.\nVictor was sure he loved his wife, and almost he had lost her. His savings\nwere wiped out, there were debts :he needed savings. Beyond was the high\nway he must be travelling with Justice Targett : a high way with high barriers\nwhere one needed to pay high tolls. Risk, shock, wastage. So this had been :\nso at least for the time of the crucial years of his career ahead, it must not be\nagain.\nVictor Breddan sat in a calm body. His chestnut hair rose like an ordered\nhedge from his narrow forehead. His mouth was pursed. A dimple in his\nchin. His hands were clasped on a knee.\nThen his shoulders moved upward. He got up stiff. He undressed. He\nfolded away his clothes. He lay beside his wife.\nShe was moving warmly through a water of deep sleep. Sleep laved her,\nit was passionate soft like the touch of her child within herself, as had been\nher hand laid on her swelling stomach. Now, a cold current cutting like silver\nthrough the dark sea of her sleep.. . She awoke. Victor beside her. He slept\nsoundly: he had filled up his mind.\n2.\nRose from her bed and moved about her world a tall gaunt woman with\nlips cut as by steel, with lips moveless as she spoke. She lived ; the world called\nSophie, called Mrs. Breddan ; she answered the world.\nHer husband was calm with his filled-up mind. Each morning he went down\ntown, at evening returned laden with papers and a weighted silence under all his\nwords. Her husband was full with his ambitious life. She came to understand\nthe hard will of her husband .. . She did not understand, but she felt that it\nwas cruel. She received his cruelty, and the seed of fear that lives in cruelty\nlike a seed in a hard shell she received also. She was a woman, she was a receiv-\ner of seed. She was a woman who needed other seed than the hard dead will\nof her husband.\nHe lay beside her at night. He was very near and aloof : a dull knife\nthat her love threw herself upon, and that would not cut her. She was all whole :\nlike a knot she lay writhed beneath her man who would not cut her and loose"}, {"page_pdf": 43, "page_imprimee": "224", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.43", "texte": "her. She went forth from him into the hammering world : it also would not\nloose her. She was in no way burst open.\nAnna Suchy kneaded her bread, nursed her child : with stout strong arms\nshe held and released her husband. She was a multitude of duties. Her eyes\nwere a little closer upon the bareness of her face. She had no time to visit\nSophie in her flat. Sophie came more and more to her, explainless, silent.\nAnna was glad. She bustled and chattered about the silence of her friend\nlike a flock of sparrows about a branch in winter. Wherever her duties took her,\nSophie was willing to be. Sophie lived in the need of helping, helping no matter\nhow with Hilda. But Anna was a woman and a mother, simple and elemental\nbeyond help. She had her nest to build, her child to nurture. lyike any female.\nBuilt to work alone. And this was the closest of Anna's duties. Motherhood\ncame from her fingers as her breasts like its intricate web from a spider's spin-\nnerets. Sophie sat silent :at times she held the child, placed her in the crib,\nmoved the crib. She sat with still eyes following the mother's hands and lips\nas she washed the baby.\nSophie came to swing with a dull beat between her emptiness and her\nfriend's fullness. She dwelt nowhere. Neither her world nor the other world\ncould she take wholly to her. She swung, dully. Her mouth was very still.\nHer seeking, swung contrariwise to her imprisoned body. She was in\nconflict: a slow dizziness came to live within the eyes of Sophie.\nShe knew that Anna loved her. She was thankful. She was thankful\nas a mute creature — as a cat is thankful who gleans of a strange creature's\nlove the right to lie by a stove. Anna was strange to Sophie : she used her\nlove like a mute hungry creature. And Anna in her love for Sophie was moved\nout of herself : out of her comfort, out of her domain : into a world of limitless\nhorizon whither her mind and her instincts could not follow. Her care for child\nand man was of her flesh. It fitted, it was heiself, it was within her like her\nheart that went on working. Her love for Sophie was not of her : it stood upon\nher. Sheer and separate it stood where God had placed it. Her love of man\nand child was buiied in her like a heart : it did not see it had no need of seeing.\nHer love for this woman who came and did nothing and was silent was an Eye\nupon her. It looked out. It beheld. But what it beheld it could not bring\nto Anna's mind in words. For Anna had no understanding of the beholding of\nher love. She could only be gentle to her friend, and chatter cheerily, see\nand be sorry that she was unhappy."}, {"page_pdf": 44, "page_imprimee": "225", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.44", "texte": "Sophie walked westward through the high brimming Block . . . through\nothers growing gradually neater, harsher, less alive ... to the Park.\nShe sat among children.\nThey wrreathed about her in curves and flares of movement that had her\nheart for center. They were about her as her feelings within her. Little boys\nwith serious mouths in leather leggins and fur caps ; little girls, gold-curled,\nbundled in blue-wool. . . played, shouted, leaped like particles of light in a\nconcentric rainbow. Sophie sat still in the cold air, on the cold bench, feeling\ntheir luminous warmth.\nAside her, on benches, thrust away from her world, nurses in hard lines.\nShe saw them talking among themselves, sufficient among themselves, opaque\nto children. Hard voices thrust back to the world of children orders. Voices\nof women, brittle and weak beside this chaos of colors.\nSophie's agony was bright with the dancing colors of children. Her\nagony was her life : she sat cold and still, but there was her agony within the\nflames of children, her life . . . burning her, making her yet warm. '\nNurses were long strokes blotting. They covered something Sophie could\nnot see . . .\nAcross the walk, alone, sat a nurse clad in blue. Blue cape caught lissomly\nabout her slender shoulders. Blue brimless bonnet, tucked with an organdie\nwhite . . . bow beneath white pointed chin. . . sat clear on clear hair, Sophie's\neyes met eyes that drew her. She crossed and sat with the nurse on the green\nbench. She said no word. Sophie and the nurse felt each other, saying\nno word.\nA boy played with a hoop. He beat it savagely with his stick when it\nrefused to roll: he got on his knees to beat it savagely. He beat at the heart of\nSophie . . .\nSudden she said : \" The mothers — all the mothers of all these children —\nwhat do they do ? Where are they ? They're not all working, are they ? —\nnot all dead ? . . . \"\nThe blue nurse did not turn.\n\" All dead, \" she answered.\nSophie waited.\n\" Alive ... all dead. \"\n— \" All dead \" was a high hard stroke of cloud, it beat, it bled the dancing\nof children .. . Children \\ bled and drooped .. . children danced no more .. .\n\" All dead. \"\nSharply Sophie got up. She walked away, slow."}, {"page_pdf": 45, "page_imprimee": "226", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.45", "texte": "She walked away from a world whose heart she was. She could no longer bear\nthis being its heart. She returned to her flat.\nShe opened, shut the door. She sat in a chair. She was not conscious of\nher passage from the Park.\nIt was late morning. She did not stir. Sun placed a finger on her foot.\nHis finger rose. His finger rose ... It lit the matted hair on her ear. She\n# ♦\nhad not stirred.\nHer husband entered. She did not stir ...\nShe turned her head, heavy . . . looked at her man with a look so weighted\nit took time to reach him. He bent and kissed her.\n\" Tired, sweetheart ? \"\nHer mind threw a happening before her eyes she had not known when it\nwas borne to her. Now ... a tall blond boy — young man finely tall —\nwith thick hair, thin hands, as she passed coming home on the Block, a tall\nfine man — he stops : he looks at her : he is graceful standing.\nTender inquiry in his eyes, as not now in her husband's ! . . .\nSophie flung herself into her husband's arms.\nShe felt his hands holding her body, claiming it, drinking it, that way he\nhad . . . hands eager for themselves.\n\"Me... me ! \" she cried silently in her throat.\nHe kissed her. He was very content, very happy. — She loves me. .. .\n3.\nAnna was small and ashamed, half suppliant, half exultant before\nthe tense body of her friend. Sophie's face was turned away in order not to\nsee: now her body saw and it throbbed like steel against her naked\nnerves.\nAnna was going to have another baby.\nComing that day into her kitchen Sophie knew this. She said nothing,\nher neck strained fiercely now with her averted face. She turned her eyes\nfull to the pleading eyes of Anna : she placed her hands on Anna's shoulders.\nShe kissed her eyes.\n\" Have you known long ? \"\n\"No — I — just .. . \" Anna was pale, eyes brimmed. She took\nSophie's hand, the other. . . stroked them together, held them hot against her\ncheek. \" You are so wonderful! \" she exclaimed.\n\" So wonderful, \" smiled Sophie."}, {"page_pdf": 46, "page_imprimee": "227", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.46", "texte": "One great change. Sophie no longer yearned to do caring things for Hilda.\nShe was glad now of Anna's subjective motherhood. She did not realise, in\nits true terms, this change. Merely that she was more at peace : as she sat\nnow in Anna's kitchen peace was nearer . . . waiting, waiting . . . and this she\naccepted, docilely, mute, as a driven beast after the work-day night.\nThe months went. Anna was heavier, more languid : she allowed her\nfriend to do more things for her. She allowed her to sweep the kitchen, to bring\nfresh water to the room of Mr. Kandro. She allowed her to scrub the floors.\nShe gave her orders. When Sophie broke a dish : \"My ! how can you be\nso careless ? \"\nSophie was in peace. She did not look at Hilda. She came at length\nnot even to look at Anna. Nearly all days, as the time grew near, she came\nto Anna and helped her. She needed to be near her .. . near her in order to\nbe waiting, in order to find the heart of waiting .. . She needed not to see her.\nShe helped her.\nSophie hated children.\nShe walked to the Park through the summer streets that were lush with\nthem, that were a surge and a delirium of children ; streets overflowed with shim-\nmering boys and girls, streets banked with heavy women, walled with arrogant\nsucking women's bellies. But she walked always on. She walked as if she had\nbeen swimming through a sea. If she stopped she must sink. No Park bench,\nno heat, no shade of a thick tree could make her stop. . . Until she was in\nher flat, limp, with dry eyes and with a skin scorched by the passion she had\nwalked through.\nWalking so, she did not perspire. Now seated still, she was soon drenched\nwith sweat.\nShe saw the tall boy — young man, finely tall — with thick hair, thin\nhands whose eyes, looking at her, gave her a tender touch. She never looked\nat him straight, he was there in her mind. He had a long, gentle face, pointed\nchin, blue eyes. He was good somehow in his rough grey shirt and his rough\ntweed suit and his low heavy shoes that showed the grace of his ankles.\nHe was frightened of her. He was like a woman. He was this boy, forever\nsweet in her averted mind where he stood aloof, slenderly, silent . . ."}, {"page_pdf": 47, "page_imprimee": "228", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.47", "texte": "... He walked directly in her path. She was flanked by warring children,\nearnest as only children. They were both blocked by children. They had\nto stand, facing each other, till the tangle unswarmed.\nShe saw him blush. His face was close. His eyes went out to hers, asking\na question. Her lips that were always moveless quivered.\n\" You are unhappy, \" she heard him.\nHer breathing was brutal strokes against her.\n\" Can't we go to the Park. . . and talk it over ? \" She heard him above\nthe clamor of her breathing.\n\"No : lam married. \" She heard herself beneath the clamor of her\nbreathing.\n\" But you're unhappy! \" She thought her breast would break with\nthis clamor of her breathing .. . She saw his eyes holding her. Then : — she\nsaw his mouth part, break with indecision. Her breathing lessened. Since\nhis mouth was so, she was able to pass him.\n.. . She said to herself : \"Am I unhappy ? \"\nShe said to herself : \" Why should I . . . just I . . . be unhappy so ? \"\nThen her thought turned : \" I am unhappy. \"\nShe was afraid. Each time this thought came to her, came too the young-\nman who had taught her. She did not want this. She put away the thought\nthought of the young man also. All her thought, all her feeling were deep tangled\nin this thought. She came, more and more, more and more easily, to put\naway all her thought, all her feeling.\nWhen she saw him in the Block, it was she who looked at him, like reach-\ning down for a Word that she had buried. It was he who could not look\nstraight : his face was clouded : turning away from her his face he turned into\nsome inner shadow.\nAnna went soon to bed, her child was a splendid girl, they christened her\nIvouisa.\nSophie shut one dim door, the hall was a black stroke upon her cheek,\nand opened the other. It was late afternoon and she must prepare her husband's\nsupper. She had been with Anna who lay in bed, very moist, very chatter-\nful, eager to get up. For Anna's feet and hands knew how to do. But\nher tongue was awkward. It was easier to do than to tell Sophie how. She\nwas hot and moist and comfortless in bed : healthy already : ready again to\nbegin."}, {"page_pdf": 48, "page_imprimee": "229", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.48", "texte": "She was cross with Sophie, giving her difficult orders, cross also with Mr.\nKandro who came early in order to be of use, these days with Anna in bed.\nThe big dark man moved noiselessly about, trying to be of use. The tops of\nhis cheeks gleamed white about the massed black beard : the white of his eyes\ngleamed under toppling brows. He was gentle and stupid, when Anna was cross\nhe smiled at Sophie, and Sophie who almost never smiled felt warm and\nsmiled — she couldn't to him — at Anna.\n\"Do you think lyouisa is a pretty name ? \" Sophie asked Victor.\n\"It will do. Why ? \"\n\" That's what they've called — Suchy's new little girl. \"\nVictor felt very vaguely a strangeness in Sophie's choice of words. Their\ndim recording of a world infinitely beyond his mind. He was cheerful tonight :\nhe had many things to say : all else faded.\n\" Well dear, I've good news. I can get named for Assemblyman if I\nwant to ! And there's the money in the Bank. \"\nHe got up, he stood behind Sophie's chair, he placed his hands about her\nthroat. \" Now you tell me, do I want it ? \"\nHis hand were a little heavy. Sophie was glad she could say :\n\" You are choking me, Victor. \"\nHe slipped his grasp to her chin, tilted her head.\n\" It's up to you. You decide, Darling. You decide eveiything. Shall\nI go to the Assembly ? \"\n\" What do they do in the Assembly ? \"\n\" Don't you know ? Make laws. \"\n\" You will make laws ? \"\nHe leaned and kissed her forehead. He was very sure of himself, sure of\nhis wife, sure of the kind of laws he would help make in the Assembly.\n\" Well ? \"\n\" Iyaws are funny things, \" said Sophie.\nWomen are funny things. \" Victor, a little hurt, stepped away.\n\" Women are serious things ... Or aren't they ?. . . \" She got up.\n\" Tell me, Victor, \" she said, \" tell me ... of course dear, I want you to\ngo to the Assembly. \"\nHe sat and pulled her down to him, and placed her on his knees. She was\nstiffly erect. She was as a tall as he was. Now her head was above him.\nAbove the neat containment of his profile, her full face, a smothered flame.\nBut she did not burn him. He smiled, living in his neat life, thinking in his\nneat thoughts, speaking in his well-ordered words. She burned in smother.\nHis plans . . his ambitions. He must remain free as he was .. . free of\ndebts, free of worry. With her whole to stand by him and share his plans,"}, {"page_pdf": 49, "page_imprimee": "230", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.49", "texte": "his ambitions. As he spoke, her head moved up and down, slowly, jerkily, in\na sort of sardonic rhythm with his words. Her breasts ached.\nShe got up. She placed her two forefingers stiff against his eyes so that\nhe needed to shut them.\n\" What would you do, \" she said, \"if I put out your eyes ? \"\nHe laughed. \" Women are funny things ! \"\nShe pressed her two forefingers. She felt the bulb of his eyes give in. She\nwithdrew her fingers into fists. Fists very hard and fierce beat against her\nbreasts, again and again, in silence, rhythmically, where they ached. He did\nnot hear their beating — with shut eyes.\n4.\nVictor, high-keyed and glowing as never before, was drab to Sophie as\nnever before. He was out of her world :he was happy and strong as she had\nnever made him in the earliness of their love, when he was a boy laying his\nhead on her lap and letting his fingers blindly stray to her face, to her mouth\nwhich kissed them. It was terrible, seeing him a man, and turned to a world\nthat seemed to love him since it made him glow, and that was not she. He\nwas less hers, less lovely to her. She saw him come in, bright-eyed, sharp-\nworded, in new clothes smart; he was drab to her. He told her of his nomina-\ntion, she stood as a stranger willing to applaud as if that had been all he could\nwant further of her. He spoke of his meetings, of his assurance of success,\nhe showed her letters; he had hushed words for the silent work of Justice Tar-\ngett. And she beheld him, outside the circle of her flame like a black dead world\nthat had been once within it. He asked her if she did not wish to come to\nthe Campaign meetings, she answered yes. . . and knew for the first time she\nhad lied to her man.\nHe did not press her. He was too happy in himself, letting this new\nworld time him up and away.\nShe was alone now evenings, also, alone. She lay on her back, dressed on\nher bed, and tried to recall a world in which it seemed to her she had been alive.\nA world to which she woke with sunlight dancing under her eyelids. A world\nin which, walking from her flat to the street, there was purpose and cheer. A\nworld in which it was natural to take food inorder to go on living in it: natural\nto love inorder to feel that she was living in it. A world in which the hours, for\nall the pain they held, pointed hopeward, sunward : where though at times the\nearth was packed with pain, about the earth was the Air, all about : infinite spaces\nfull of the Sun .. . She lay on her back and reached for her man who was hers,\nwho had his hands upon her and his lips. She could grasp nothing. Her mind"}, {"page_pdf": 50, "page_imprimee": "231", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.50", "texte": "was dull. It had a way of stopping upon a crack in the wall as if it had been\nan abyss.\nShe left Anna alone. She lay on her bed, she sat in her chair. When\nVictor was not to be home to supper, often she cooked no food for herself. Once\nwhen the bell rang, and she knew it was Anna, she did not respond.\nAnna said to herself : \" Sophie is very busy with her husband. He is\nrunning for the Election. She must be helping him or something \". Anna\ndid not believe this, she did not know what she believed : this she managed to\nsay to herself. It was enough.\nShe was busy. Louisa was a big child for her four months. Already she\ngave her a little milk from the bottle each day. The hands and the feet\nof Anna forever at work in her rooms did not miss Sophie. Her eyes missed\nher : but her eyes spoke feebly, when her hands and her feet were at work.\nShe sat, half turned away from the kitchen table. In her hand was a\nlarge piece of buttered bread and cheese. In her lap lay easefully balanced\na cup of coffee. Cake was on the table. Close to the door which was the\nsafest place sat Hilda who was two : looking at her mother, crooning and beg-\nging for food.\n\" No, you — you have had your lunch. Mama eat, once, won't\nyou ? You'll get so fat, you, I won't have room for you here .. . I'll have\nto put you in the street if you eat all the time... Do you want me — you —\nto put you in the street ? \"\nHilda forged across vast spaces to the table. Her hands beat against the\nwooden leg that held the top that held the cake she needed. Anna gave her\na piece. It crumbled against Hilda's rosy mouth and fell. Hilda followed to\nthe sight of her feet where the cake lay crumbled. She was satisfied. An oc-\ncasional glance up the table leg where was the table's top and the cake •—\nwhen these crumbs were gone.\nAnna talked with her mouth full of cake and coffee. She was very soft and\ncomfortable in her kitchen : her grey dress was warm like the skin of her cheeks.\n\" You'll be a fatty ! \" she warned. \" There. \" With a fat large shoe\nshe shoved a piece of the cake into Hilda's reach.\nThe door opened.\nAnna thrust her coffee away and jumped up, startled.\n\" Michael! \"\nMichael was not due until late that evening. But still it was he. Solid\nand heavy and sure, he stood in the door.\n\" It's me, \" he announced."}, {"page_pdf": 51, "page_imprimee": "232", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.51", "texte": "\" What has happened ! \" Anna's mind raced through the catastrophes\nthat his standing there excluded. Her children were alive, Iyouisa slept in her\ncrib, Michael was alive also — not sick, not injured.\n\" They telephoned me . . . when I got to the Barn they give me the message.\nIt's Papa. \"\n\" He's very sick ! \"\n\" Max says for us to come right over, while his alive. I came back.\"\nHe stood there, his cap in a fat hard hand, turning a round face upon\nhis commanding wife. His face was slightly tilted to one side, and his eyes\nmoved from Anna to the floor. Anna knew he was suffering. He was ill\nat ease in suffering. Almost, he was embarrassed. He looked a little as he look-\ned to her when, for a reason connected with his food, he sulked. But he was\nwarmer, more like a child : in his own soul, was softer than when he sulked.\nHer mind worked.\n\" I can get Sophie. We can be back. When do you think ?\n\"In a few hours. Only we go there and see him. I can wait till he dies.\nYou don't have to. \"\nHe blocked the door. She had to take him by the hand, lead him to a chair.\nHis eyes looked diagonally down to the floor about Hilda, inattentive, who\ncried against the imperviousness of table legs upon whose top was cake. So\nhe sat: Anna rang Sophie's bell.\nShe rang it again, again.\nSophie stood before her with swollen eyes as if she had slept. She wore\na dark wrapper. It was open at the front and Anna saw that Sophie was half\ndressed. She had no corsets.\nIt went through her mind that Sophie looked sick — or funny. She\nknew the inconsequence of illness in a woman, when a duty spoke.\n\" Sophie \" she said, \"my man's papa — he's dying — over in Brook-\nlyn. We got to go. I'll be back by supper. Will you come over and take\ncare of Iyouisa? Just for a few hours, Sophie dear. There's milk over the\nstove to give to her —at five I have just nursed her. That's enough. She'll\nsleep most likely all the time. Will you come ? \"\n\" Right away ? \"\n\" Right away. \"\nSophie shut the dim door behind her. They stepped in unison across\nthe hall. The other dim door received them.\nAnna stuffed her body into a coat, found her hat. She changed her slip-\npers to shoes. She had few clothes forgoing out.\n\" I'll take Hilda into the bedroom to be near the baby, \" Sophie thought.\nShe looked long at the man who stood in the hall, fingering his cap, with eyes"}, {"page_pdf": 52, "page_imprimee": "233", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.52", "texte": "forever diagonally downcast .. . Father of children .. . She said no word\nto him. He bowed, and she said no word, she looked away, seeing hkn still. . .\nfather of children.\nShe was alone .. . behind the other door.\nShe stood a moment, looking where they had left. She felt alone. She\npinned her wrapper high at her throat. She remembered the children with\nwhom she was alone .. . not alone then. —In my own flat alone : not here .. .\nThere with the truth of loneliness she had come not to feel it. Here, where\nthere were many things, many voices, lives, she was not alone, she felt lonely.\nA faint shiver rose from her stomach to her shoulders. She jerked it off\nher ears. She walked into the kitchen. Hilda looked at her, suspended in\nher ceaseless hopeful effort to reach the top of a table where was cake. Sophie\ntook a bit of the cake, placed it firmly in Hilda's palm. She lifted her.\n\" Hold on tight, now, \" she said. She carried her out.\nThrough the hall of the flat she looked to the front room of Mr. Kandro.\nShe noticed that it was far away : she did not think it was strange that it should\nseem so. His door was open. Sunlight was sharp there like a flame burning\non a black stick. It made her know that she had on a wrapper and that she\n■ was not presentable if she should meet him in the hall : she forgot that she had\nmet already Anna's man — and that she could certainly run over to her flat\nand get a dress, and put it on in the Suchy bedroom. Then she was aware of\nhaving come without her key. It was instinct, before she shut her door, to feel,\nthat she had her key. This time she had shut it, not feeling.\nShe went into the bedroom of the Suchys.\nShe forgot key and wrapper. The shade was up, the room breathed quietly.\nA brown light, very full, in the room, was its breath like Anna's breathing\nthat came also full from all her little body.\nSophie closed the door at her back, stood still, holding Hilda in her arms.\nThere was the double-bed, covered with a great patch quilt. The bed was\nquiet and proud : the quilt with its blacks and reds was vibrance making the bed\nmove .. . lifting it, bringing the corners of the room into a sort of wooden\ndance. At the bed's side was a low cot: at its foot the baby slept in her open\ncrib. There was a bureau, littered. There was a rocking chair.\nDominant the bed. Under the arrogant vibrance of its quilt lived depths.\nDepths quiet. Sleep of a man and woman, sleeping and waking together.\nBirth. Still moment before birth — just a moment was it in her long perspec-\ntive — when man gave wholly, shattered, gave himself, the world that was his,\nthe world and its infinite reaches forward and back — and when woman took . . .\nSophie went quietly to the rocker, still holding Hilda, and sat down.\nThe child was hushed. She held her cake in her tight fist. She did not eat\n4"}, {"page_pdf": 53, "page_imprimee": "234", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.53", "texte": "of it. Her eyes were wide. She held her body upright in the woman's arms.\nShe was hushed.\nSophie faced toward the crib and the bed. She remained . very quiet,\nlong. She arose. She placed Hilda upon the cot. The child lay docilely on\nher back, her eyes still wide. Sophie crossed to the bed's other side. For a\nmoment she peered toward the window. Then she lay down, softly, upon the\nbed. She did not touch the pillows : Her face was flat below them : her body\nwas at an angle. The palms of her hands moved measuredly at her side, up\nand down, rubbing the quilt, as if they sought the quiet deep beneath it.\nHer hands came to rest. She slept.\nHilda's eyes closed also, above her little cot. She slept„ . .\nThe baby awoke . . . and began to cry.\nShe cried low, in measure, as if she were prepared to cry a long time. She\ncried a long time.\nHer voice was a little green vine stringing its way across the brown breath\nof the room. It clambered up into the air : it lay athwart the window : it\ndrooped upon the bed, touching Sophie's hands with its tender shoots. It\ntouched her ears that slept beneath her hair.\nSophie awoke. She saw the room full of the green tracery of the infant's\ncrying.\n\" Yes, yes. \" She sat.\nShe arose. She took Louisa from her crib, smoothing her dresses. She\ntook her to the chair and held her against her bosom and began to rock.\nLouisa cried. Her crying was the small white buds upon the vine.\n\" Yes, yes, \" said Sophie.\nShe held the baby forward in her arms and looked at her. She placed\nher lips on the wet cheeks, on the blinking eyes, on the tousled hair.\n\" Yes, yes\nHolding her to one side, with her right hand she loosed her wrapper. She\nlet fall her left breast free from its scant sheath. Very tenderly, very closely,\nwith eyes far away, she held the baby against it.\nLouisa's crying was red small flowers against the green of her hunger.\n\" Yes, yes, \" Sophie crooned again. She pressed the baby closer. The\ncrying was a flame running fast.\nSophie thrust her forward upon her lap. She lay there, upon her back,\nher fists crumpled, her face tortured : a leaping passion she lay there.\nSophie's hands were very fierce, very swift. She tore the wrapper from her\nshoulders. Down to her waist she rent away her clothes. Her shoulders were\nsharp and white. Her breasts — small, pear-shaped, firm — were the breasts\nof a tall virgin."}, {"page_pdf": 54, "page_imprimee": "235", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.54", "texte": "Once more she gathered the baby from the torn clothes that lay about her\non her lap, held her close. The nipples stood sheer. She crushed Louisa against\nthem.\nThe infant wailed : Sophie pressed more close. The wail was a shriek.\nSophie had no sense of her self separate from this life upon her.\nShe had no sense of its shriek above the shriek of her flesh. She folded her\narms about the infant and crushed her close, feeling her breasts crush, bruise,\nfeeling her breasts swell out and encase the child and the shriek. She drew her\nhands about her naked shoulders, she pressed with her hands and with her\nthroat, with all her imprisoning self she pressed that had so long pressed-in what\nnow was sweetly escaping. She moved up and down in her chair, pressing,\npressing.\n\" Yes, yes, \" she said. And the child's shriek was over.\n\" Yes, yes.\nIn the silence, she knew that what had been within, so long, so terribly\nwas now outside her. A sagging, a cutting thing within, breaking her back,\nclamping her throat, tugging the flesh of her breasts — now warm, now a being,\nlike a babe, at her breast. And her self flowing upon it, giving it blood and\nmilk.\nShe sat rocking, crooning. The rocking ceased, then the crooning.\nShe sat with wide eyes, wide lips, faintly upturned in a smile . . .\nDarkness came like smoke into the room, fining at last all of it with a black\nstir save the room's center which was still and glowed and was a woman . . .\na half naked woman clasping a child's body.\n\nWaldo Frank"}, {"page_pdf": 55, "page_imprimee": "236", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.55", "texte": "STARS AT TALLAPOOSA\nWallace Stevens\nThe lines are straight and swift between the stars.\nThe night is not the cradle that they cry,\nThe criers, undulating the deep-oceaned phrase.\nThe lines are much too dark and much too sharp.\nThe mind herein attains simplicity.\nThere is no moon, no single, silvered leaf.\nThe body is no body to be seen\nBut is an eye that studies its black lid.\nL,et these be your delight, secretive hunter,\nWading the sea-lines, moist and ever-mingling,\nMounting the earth-lines, long and lax, lethargic.\nThese lines are swift and fall without diverging.\nThe melon-flower nor dew nor web of either\nIs like to these. But in yourself is like :\nA sheaf of brilliant arrows flying straight,\nFlying and falling straightway for their pleasure,\nTheir pleasure that is all bright-edged and cold ;\nOr, if not arrows, then the nimblest motions,\nMaking recoveries of young nakedness\nAnd the lost vehemence the midnights hold.\n\nCONVERSATIONS\nIvast night, ghosts of flowers floated\ncolorless, yet still perfect of frail form,\nsea jellies in the night-waters ;\nand with invisible voices they wailed :\n\" Pray for us ! Pray for us ! \"\nAlas ! Iyost flowers, why should ye ask\nfor the prayers of a man ?\n\" That we may rise to be men, fool \\\" they answered.\nBut I prayed instead the impossible prayer\nthat men should become flowers."}, {"page_pdf": 56, "page_imprimee": "237", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.56", "texte": "VOYAGE\nS. Foster Damon\nIt is an indisputable fact\nthat the load of grotesque humans\nin this awkward ship\nis moving directly toward\nthe glory of the rising moon.\nIt is not so indisputable\nthat they shall never reach it.\nFor I can see them,\nstrained through the sieve of many generations,\nsetting forth from the silver rim of the moon\nin an irradiant galleon\ntoward the sun itself.\n\nALL IS ONE\nMartin Armstrong\nI hear the flowing of great rivers\nAnd the long slow breathing of the wind,\nAnd solemnly, unceasingly,\nL,ike gleaming fish\nIn weeds beneath dim water,\nStars on their universal way\nGlide among woven boughs.\nAll is one,\nSurely, indivisibly.\nA falling pebble\nRuffles the pool's clear face,\nAnd in those wavering circles waken\nPowers that shall change the motion of Orion\nAnd vex the dreaming of a thousand stars.\nDeeds are immortal,\nOnce the rose is gathered,\nNothing can ever be.the same again."}, {"page_pdf": 57, "page_imprimee": "238", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.57", "texte": "THE APOLLO OF VEII\n\nOn the 19th May 1916, in the middle of the great war, a new Apollo was\nbrought to light by the excavators of the Italian government at Veio, the an-\ncient Veii of the Etruscans. Although the professor superintending the work ~\nknew that his discovery was of prime importance, not only archaeologically but\nalso artistically, the discovery remained the secret of a few persons until 1920.\nThen the director of the Etruscan Museum in Rome gave photographs and partic-\nulars to the Italian press, and the new Apollo caused a momentary flutter of\nexcitement among those interested in antique art. The statue in question forms\npart of a group representing the myth of Apollo fighting with Hercules for a\nhind in the presence of two other divinities, one of whom can be recognized as\nMercury. Another is probably Diana, but this portion of the group of statuary,\nwhich probably formed part of the decoration of a temple, is ruined. The subject\nis often repeated in ancient art, and there is a notable example of the struggle of\nApollo with Hercules, on a bronze helmet in Paris.\nThat the statues in question, and especially the Apollo which is reproduced\nin this number of Broom are of considerable importance will reveal itself at a\nglance. These reproductions of the sculpture of the unknown Etruscan artist\nhave not so far appeared — as far as we know — in any illustrated periodical out\nof Italy. The statues are not even yet shown to the general public at the\nEtruscan museum at the Villa Giulia in Rome.\nThe style of the statues is lonic-Etruscan of the end of the vith or the be-\nginning of the vth century B. C. Professor Giglioli of the Etruscan museum gives\nthe date of the Veii Apollo as 500 B. C. The work is in terra cotta and has had\nto be considerably restored. The Apollo is covered with a coating of polished\nclay, which, as with many ancient terra cottas, has a yellowish color. The nude\nparts of the body are painted that brownish- red [which characterizes male fig-\nures in archaic sculpture. The statue was all of a piece, and made of clay about\nan inch and a quarter thick, and was baked entire, for which purpose holes were\nleft in the plinth and the shoulders.\nBut the archaeological details do not concern us here so much as the artistic\ninterest of the life-size god. The pose of the advancing figure, the tremendous\nforce of the head and face, the curious malignity in the mask-like countenance add\nsomething fresh to our conception of this deity, wrought and rewrought in al-\nmost every kind of plastic material by the artists of Asia and Europe.\nThe statue raises for us once again the perplexing riddle: who were the Etrus-\ncans ? The unknown Veian artist has contrived to give to the Sun god a touch"}, {"page_pdf": 58, "page_imprimee": "239", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.58", "texte": "of that Sphinx-like character which is responsible for the charm of Etruscology,\nthat fascination which led the old Englishman Dennis to spend years travelling\nabout alone in the 'eighteen-forties through the forgotten and buried cities of the\npeople that gave her earliest arts to Rome.\nHow different is the conception of the lonic-Etruscan or Italo-Etruscan\nartist, author of the Veii Apollo from that even of the primitive Greeks. Without\ngoing into the technical details, which demonstrate a decadence of the pure archaic\nstyle, we find this example of Etruscan art has something of its own. In the\nexpression of the face, there is something sinister and cruel, dark and hermetic.\nFar indeed is it removed from the sunny tragicness of the Greek art of the per-\nfect period.\nIt has the strangeness of the names of the strange gods of Etruria, as Tages\n\" a wondrous boy with a hoary head and the wisdom of age who sprang from the\nfresh ploughed furrows of Tarquinii \", or dark Typhoon with his mallet, the Sa-\ntanic deity, or Phuphlums, a grimmer Bacchus.\nEtruscan art is mostly known to the general cultured public by those later\nexamples of it when it merges into Etrusco-Roman art, as in those monstrously\nsmug funeral statues that we see on tombs and cinerary monuments. Even here\nsomething of the sensual divinity which characterizes the expression of works like\nthe Veii Apollo and the Veii Mercury remains. It persists, indeed, diluted, in\nItalian art of much later epochs.\nThat modern sculpture has points of contact with the antique art is self\nevident. What is interesting to note is how close sometimes these points of\nrelation may be. The preoccupation of modern sculptors with pure form has\nits analogy in the works of the ancients, where what is known in art jargon as\nplastic import or significant form occupied consciously or unconsciously the\nold time sculptors to a considerable extent. And probably, much more con-\nsciously than is generally supposed.\nThis form would seem to be the chief obsession of the modern artist. The\nvivifying spiritual influence he must find in himself. What does the modern ar-\ntist accept whole-heartedly as his motive faith shall we say ? Christianity ?\nNo. Paganism ? It can only be a charming affectation. A kind of sublimated\nmathematics, the divinity of geometrical ratiocination ? Maybe, in part. Util-\nity ? To an extent, yes, but it is a drab creed, without cross or laurel. The\nartist usually supplies his own faith, which can be but little else than faith in\nhimself, an egocentric religion, whose ideality will rarely bear searching analysis.\nAnd if the modern and the ancient artist sometimes meet in the cerebral\nsympathies of form, in this matter of faith or spiritual impulse they are far apart.\n\nEdward Storer"}, {"page_pdf": 59, "page_imprimee": "240", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.59", "texte": "The Apollo of Veii"}, {"page_pdf": 60, "page_imprimee": "241", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.60", "texte": "Head from Etruscan Tomb Fresco"}, {"page_pdf": 61, "page_imprimee": "242", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.61", "texte": "IF YOU HAD THREE HUSBANDS\nPresent Homes\n\nThere then.\n«*»\nPresent ten.\nMother and sister apples, no not apples, they can't be apples, everything\ncan't be apples, sounds can't be apples. Do be quiet and refrain from accept-\nances.\nIt was a great disappointment to me.\nI can see that here is a balcony. There never was a sea or land, there\nnever was a harbor or a snow storm, there never was excitement. Some said\nshe couldn't love. I don't believe that anybody said that. I don't mean\nthat anybody said that. We were all present . We could be devoted. It\ndoes make a different thing. And hair, hair should not be deceiving. Cause\ntears. Why tears, why not abscesses.\nI will never mention an ugly skirt.\nIt pleased me to say that I was pretty.\nOh we are so pleased.\nI don't say this at all.\nConsequences are not frightful.\nPleasure in a home.\nAfter lunch, why after lunch, no birds are eaten. Of course carving is\nspecial.\nI don't say that for candor.\nPlease be prepared to stay.\nI don't care for wishes.\nThis is not a success.\nBy this stream.\nStreaming out.\nI am relieved from draught. This is not the way to spell water.\nI cannot believe in much.\nI have courage."}, {"page_pdf": 62, "page_imprimee": "243", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.62", "texte": "Endurance.\nAnd restraint.\nAfter that.\nFor the end.\nThis is the title of a conclusion which was not anticipated.\nWhen I was last there I smiled behind the car. What car showed it.\nBy that time.\nBelieve her out.\nOut where.\nBy that.\nBuy that.\nShe pleased me for .. . Eye saw.\nDo it.\nFor that over that.\nWe passed away. By that time servants were memorable. They came\nto praise.\nPlease do not.\nA blemish.\nThey have spans.\nI cannot consider that the right word.\nBy the time we are selfish, by that time we are selfish.\nBy that time we are selfish.\nIt is a wonderful sight,\nIt is a wonderful sight to see.\nDays.\nWhat are days.\nThey have hams.\nDelicate.\nDelicate hams.\nPounds,\nPounds where.\nPounds of.\nWhere.\nNot 'butter dogs.\nI establish souls."}, {"page_pdf": 63, "page_imprimee": "244", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.63", "texte": "Any spelling will do.\nIf you look at it.\nThat way.\nI am going on.\nIn again.\nI am going on again in in them.\nWhat I feel.\nWhat I do feel.\nThey said mirrors.\nUndoubtedly they have that phrase.\nI can see a hat.\nI remember very well knowing largely.\nAny shade, by that Ido mean iron glass. Iron glass is so torn. By\nwhat. By the glare. Be that beside. Size shall be sensible. That size shall\nbe sensible.\nFixing.\nFixing enough.\nFixing up.\nBy fixing down, that is softness, by fixing down there.\nTheir end.\nPoliteness.\nNot by linen.\nI don't wish to be recalled.\nOne, day, I do not wish to use the word, one day they asked to buy that.\nI don't mean anything by threads. It was wholly unnecessary to do so.\nIt was done and then a gun. By that stand. Wishes.\nI do not see what I have to do with that.\nAny one can help weeping.\nBy wise.\nI am so indifferent.\nNot a bite.\nCall me handsome.\nIt was a nice fate.\nAny one could see."}, {"page_pdf": 64, "page_imprimee": "245", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.64", "texte": "Any one could see.\nAny one could see.\nBuy that etching.\nDo be black.\nI do not mean to say etching. Why should I be very sensitive. Why\nshould I matter. Why need I be seen. Why not have politeness.\nWhy not have politeness.\nIn my hair.\nI don't think it sounds at all like that.\nTheir end.\nTo end.\nTo be for that end.\nI don't see what difference it makes.\nIt does matter.\nWhy have they pots.\nOrnaments.\nAnd china.\nIt isn't at all.\nI have made every mistake. '\nPowder it.\nNot put into boxes.\nNot put into boxes.\nPowder it.\nI know that well.\nShe mentioned it as she was sleeping.\nShe liked bought cake best. No she didn't for that purpose.\nI have utter confusion.\nNo two can be alike.\nThey are and they are not stubborn.\nPlease me.\nI was mistaken.\nAny way.\nBy that.\nDo not refuse to be wild.\nDo not refuse to be all.\nWe have decided not to withstand it.\nWe would rather not have the home.\nThis is not to teach lessons of exchange endurance and resemblance and\nby that time it was turned.\nShout."}, {"page_pdf": 65, "page_imprimee": "246", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.65", "texte": "By.\nOut.\nI am going to continue humming.\nThis does not mean express wishes.\nI am not so fanciful. I am beside that calculated to believe in whole\npages. Oh do not annoy me.\nDays.\nI don't like to be fitted. She didn't say that.\nIf it hadn't been as natural as all the rest you would have been as silly\nas all the rest.\nIt's not at all when it is right.\nI wish for a cake.\nShe said she did.\nShe said she didn't.\nGloom.\nThere was no gloom.\nEvery room.\nThere was no room.\nThere was no room.\nBuy that chance.\nShe didn't leave me any money.\nHead.\nAhead.\nI don't want to be visible or invisible.\nI don't want a dog named Dick.\nIt has nothing to do with it.\nI am obliged to end.\nIntend.\nMy uncle will.\n\nGertrude Stein"}, {"page_pdf": 66, "page_imprimee": "247", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.66", "texte": "WASTE\nLola Ridge\nDawn is like a broken honeycomb\nSpilling over the waxen edges of the clouds\nThat drip with light.\nSpires, swarming up the mauve mist,\nReach their rosy tips\nLike little pointed tongues\nFirst about a shining platter,\nAnd every window is a brazier\nThat cups the living gold.\nEven the squat chimneys\nRooting heaven\nCatch the sun upon their snouts\nAnd keep it balancing ...\nOnly my heart,\nIyikeTa splintered vase,\nIs envious of the light\nIt cannot hold."}, {"page_pdf": 67, "page_imprimee": "248", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.67", "texte": "GOLD\nI let the rich gold sunlight\nbind itself round me,\ninfinitely fine\nwrappings of gold,\ntill I grew blind and\nmy heart seemed to stop,\nand I thought myself\nsome Eastern emperor,\nswathed in leaf of gold,\nupright within the tomb\nof his great ancestors,\ndeep in cobalt caverns hewn\nin the savage earth.\n\nBROKEN IMAGE\nIyike the tide\nwhen it falls back\nleaving upon the shore\ndelicate seaweeds and\nwatery fantasies dead,\nso in the heart\nlove when it goes . . ."}, {"page_pdf": 68, "page_imprimee": "249", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.68", "texte": "BY THE SHORE\nFlowers flaming by the seashore,\ncrimson flowers,\nshuddering in the breeze\nas if the violent sea,\nwith its white fangs\nhad wounded earth,\nand the blood dripped\nperfumedly\no'er the salty stones.\n\nDREAMS\nPoppies in the corn,\nlike dreams among reality,\nwhere man to live,\nthe white bread must savour\nwith rosy dreams,\ndelicate dreams.\n\nILLUSION\nEdward Storer\nWhere the moon's image lay\npalely printed on water,\na summer moth\nlay dying happily . . .\nshe thought she died upon the moon.\n5"}, {"page_pdf": 69, "page_imprimee": "250", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.69", "texte": "THE LIMBO OF AMERICAN LITERATURE\n\nI.\nCritics are the conscience of a literature. When we speak of the <112 artistic\nconscience \" of a writer, we mean his power of self-criticism. Hence, the above\ndictum is simply a logical extension of the term, \" artistic conscience.\"\nWith the reminder that dated periods in literature are arbitrary and over-\nlapping, I would make an 1860-1910 period in American literature which\nmight be called the Neo-Colonial or the Neo-Puritanic Era. It starts approx-\nimately with the death of the New England School and terminates roughly\nwith the rise of the present. Young America into prominence.\nDuring these fifty years American literature was either without a conscience,\nor with a diseased conscience, or, at the best, with only a very feeble right-\neous conscience. During this time the adventures of a vigorous plutocracy\nand the servitudes exacted by it, sapped the energies of America; the middle\nclass moralists planted all their stodgy weight upon the creative spirit; Vic-\ntorian England filled up the entire intellectual and literary horizon. The\nrespectable morally-minded business-serving professor-preacher, e.g., Ha-\nmilton Wright Mabie, was an unchallenged blight and a White Iyist of books\nwas an imperial decree issued with divine sanction. Percival Pollard, Walter\nBlackburn Harte, a few others were desperate enough to protest in the name\nof literary art, but how far did their voices, choked up in magazines of weak\nprestige, carry into the American consciousness ? At no time between the Civil\nWar and 1910 was there a sizable corps of critical spirits in love with aesthetic\nform to war brilliantly for the emergence of a national literature embodying\nthe realities of human experience in America. looking back now, we per-\nceive two results of this deficiency.\nThe first affects our three literary men of admitted genius in that period\n— Walt Whitman, Henry James, Mark Twain. The wreckage of Mark Twain's\ngreat gift in that conscienceless era has lately been ably demonstrated. What\nhappened to the other two who fulfilled in a high degree the natural urge of\ntheir genius was a very thorough failure to achieve any immediate wide-\nspread contact with the minds and actions of their countrymen. Henry"}, {"page_pdf": 70, "page_imprimee": "251", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.70", "texte": "James has influenced two creditable novelists in America, but compare this\nwith the much larger following he has inspired in England. He took the art\nof novel-writing with the greatest seriousness, a preoccupation so offensive\nto most Americans that his expatriation was used to steer him away from our\nattention. - So well has the charge of un-Americanism been pressed against\nJames that today it surprises us to hear young Englishmen rendering tribute\nto \" your novelist/' to\"the American, Henry James.\" This matter may\nperhaps be seen in all its absurdity if we recall Turgenev in exile at Paris\nand under the influence of Flaubert, writing novels in which the Russian\ntravelling outside his native land was often the principal figure just as the Amer-\nican in Europe was a favorite figure for James. But where is the Russian\nwho seriously contends that Turgenev belongs not to- Russian but to French\nliterature ? Walt Whitman at least was indubitably an indigenous poet, but\nfor long the bulk of his acclaim came from Europe. It was not until the\nlast decade, when a species of Whitman Renaissance sprang up, that he could\nbe said to have fermented the American mass in any recognizable degree.\nThis slowness in making contact I blame directly upon the absence of alert\nintelligent critics capable of utilizing the wonderful springboards Mark Twain,\nHenry James and Walt Whitman presented, and for proof of this contention\nI point again to Russian literature. Here we find contemporaneous with\nthe great Russian poets and novelists extremely able critics writing in powerful\nreviews who promptly expounded and praised the works of the former. The\nhuge sales of Pushkin, lyermontov, Turgenev, Dostoyevsky, Tolstoy, Gorki,\ntheir almost instant penetration into the intellectual and emotional life of Russia\nare acknowledged by historians of Russian literature to be appreciably due\nto the brilliant pens of the critics Byelinsky, Tchernyshevsky, Dubrolubov,\nPisarev and Michailovsky. These were men of a stature sorely needed in the\nranks of American critics from iB6O to 1910.\nThe other results was the creation of a cloudy limbo to which the pro-\nfessor-preachers consigned whatever original and vital talent intruded within\ntheir range of reading. Only a few swam free and received the plaudits of\nthe pundits, and these perhaps owed their reception to extra-literary causes.\nWilliam Dean Ho wells, for instance, was nominated as our foremost novelist,\nnot so much for his sustained control of good prose, as for his adoption of a\nsuave undisturbing selected realism. On the other hand, into the limbo went\na truly fascinating crew of doughty uncompromisers with art and life. A\npartial list includes Frank Norris, Ambrose Bierce, Stephen Crane, Iyafcadio\nHearn, Percival Pollard, Walter Blackburn Harte, Michael Monahan, Sada-\nkichi Hartmann, Edgar Saltus and William Vaughn James Huneker\nthey could not keep there. His enthusiastic personality came storming out,"}, {"page_pdf": 71, "page_imprimee": "252", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.71", "texte": "and even vaulted into the National Institute of Arts and Letters. Part of\nthe literary reconstruction in Anierica has been the pulling out from this limbo\nof the powerful novelist Norris, of the mordant Bierce, of the subtle prose\nartist Hearn, and thanks to the efforts of Joseph Conrad and Ford Madox\nHueffer, of Stephen Crane, whose barbarically beautiful \" Red Badge of Cour-\nage \" and whose \" The Black Riders and Other Lines, \" anticipatory by fifteen\nor twenty years of the vogue of vers libre in this country, probably hold a\nposition of much less prestige than the works of James Lane Allen in the rank-\ning lists of our reading public. Pollard and Harte have been recently discussed\nin print : Pollard's \" Their Day in Court \" will for long be an invaluable source-\nbook for the literary history of this period. Harte and Monahan and Sada-\nkichi Hartmann will probably always remain in the limbo and be discovered\nonly by the curious from time to time. Their talents lack momentum,\nbut let us honor them for their level heads and true eyes and gallant\nspirits which, in a time of most confused provincialism, chose and fought\non the intelligent side. Hartmann was early in the field for Walt Whitman,\nWhistler, Swinburne, Verlaine and Mallarme : he is a delightfully picturesque\nvagrom, but unfortunately he writes broken English, Monahan is a shrewd\nlover of books and writes with charm, geniality and insight. If he had devel-\noped a more personal idiom, and if he had placed more objectivity in his sub-\njective essays, he might have had a chance for survival. These men should\nhave been powers in the criticism of their day, but the times were against\nthem. There were no giant critics to whom they might have allied themselves\nin a profitable warfare, nor was there any access to an adequate circulation\nfor their thoughts.\nIn what plight they were may be visualized if we throw back twenty-five\nor thirty-five years a novelist like Sherwood Arderson. Anderson, emerging\nin the last decade, has found good publishers and influential magazines open\nto him. He has captured a reading public and received understanding and\npraise from a large number of important critics. The contemporary American\nnovel cannot be treated without considering his creation. But a few years\nback and how complete!} 7 his appearance might have been smothered. Con-\ndemned to tiny magazines, printed by small publishers, perhaps even forced\nto publish at his own expense, blackballed by the hordes of professor-preacher\nreviewers, he too would probably have disappeared into the limbo for decades.\nHis ability would have prevented such a fate, you say. Well, look up the\nstory of Ambrose Bierce again.\nEdgar Saltus 1 and William Vaughn Moody will be treated in more detail.\n1 Bdgar Saltus died July 31, 1921,"}, {"page_pdf": 72, "page_imprimee": "253", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.72", "texte": "5*\n\nII.\nDon't be frightened away from Saltus by President Harding's startling\npredilection for \" The Imperial Purple.\" Against such approbation set Hun-\neker's worded remark that Saltus was a \" pet author \" of his, Wilde's\n\" In Edgar Saltus's work passion struggles with grammar on every page, \" Ar-\nthur Symons g It seems to me that; Kdgar Saltus is an American wiiter al-\ntogether too little read, glow over \" The Imperial Purple/' and\nCarl Van Vechten's excellent chapter on Saltus.f The elite, then, have discussed\nhim far more than the canaille.\nStyle is a synonym for Saltus. Put this passage descriptive of the\" suicide\nof Lenox in \" Mr. Incoul's Misadventure \" through the laboratory\ntests.\n\" Then he took from the package a phial that held a brown liquid, in which\nhe detected a shade like to that of gold. The odor was dull and heavy. He\nput the phial down and stood for a moment irresolute. He had looked into the\nfuture. But in its Arcadias he saw nothing, save his own image suspended\nfrom a gibbet. He looked again almost wistfully • no, there was nothing.\nHe threw off his coat and rolled up his sleeve. From the phial he filled the\nsyringe, and with the point pricked the bare arm and sent the liquid spurting\ninto the flesh. Three times he did this. He reached for the absinthe and left\nit untasted.\n\" Into his veins had come an unknown, a delicious languor. He sank\ninto a chair. The walls of the room dissolved into cataracts of light and daz-\nzling steel. The flooring changed to crimson, and from that to black, and\nback to red again. From the ceiling came flood after flood of fused, intermin-\ngled and oscillating colors. His eyes closed. The light became more intense,\nand burned luminous through the lids. In his ears filtered a harmony, faint as\ndid it come fiom afar, and singular as were it won from some new consonance\nof citherns and clavichords, and suddenly it rose into tumultuous vibrations,\nstriated with series of ascending scales. Then as suddenly ceased, drowned\nin claps of thunder.\n\" The lights turned purple and glowed less vividly, as thongh tough veils\nwere being lowered between him and them. But still the languour continued,\nsweeter ever and more enveloping, till from very sweetness it was almost\npain.\n\" The room grew darker, the colors waned, the lights behind the falling\nveils sank dim, and dimmer, fading, one by one \\ a single spark lingered, it\nwavered a moment, and vanished into night.\"\nThis passage is not one of Saltus s most purple ! it lies level, however, with"}, {"page_pdf": 73, "page_imprimee": "254", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.73", "texte": "the bulk of his writing. Some of his early books are composed in a concise\nchaste diction of remarkable clarity : a few of the later works exhibit an as-\ntonishing style-suicide. The Syren-lure of words, the splendors within reach\nof his pen made Saltus delirious for a short period and the vitals of his prose,\nclarity, were ornamented into intoxicating but incomprehensible obscurity.\nSwinburne's fault committed in prose. \" A prose paranoiac,\" said Pollard. But\nthe last books show that Saltus again caught control of his glittering instru-\nment.\nNo other American writer cultivates sensuous appeals so much as Saltus.\nBehind the majority of his sentences Lesbian lutes play; from them perfumes\nrise, out of them colors stare or flash. His pages are stained with ochres\nand indigoes and jets. He actually compels the reader to caress delicately,\ntaste sybaritically, inhale observingly, listen carefully and see vividly what\nhe writes.\nThe rhythm of Saltus is a swift staccato intoned with a very sensitive\nfeeling for word inversions. He is a master of the short sentence, as difficult\na mastery as that of rhythmically and clearly manipulating long sentences.\nHe has a fertile gift for striking metaphor and simile. \" \" The item hung\na hammock for her thoughts, rested her mentally, unrolled a carpet for the\nreturning steps of health. \" 11 whips in his word, he added . Of Ivan\nthe Terrible, \" A cholera, corpses mounted about him.\" \" Her fingers rippled\nover the keys like rain.\" \" When she laughed one could see her tongue ; it\nwas like an innner cut of water-melon. Such as these aie as plentiful in Sal\ntus*s pages as precious stones in El Dorado.\nSaltus can report expertly the conversation of the haut monde (alas,\nthe brilliant repartee of the haut monde nowadays at least comes only from the\nclever author's brain). From \" The Monster \" I take the following conversa-\ntion, casting it into stage dialog form, between the young daredevil Aurelia\nand her stupid fiance Buttercups, nicknamed Parsnips.\nFootman : Will mademoiselle give herself the trouble to pass into the salon ?\nAurelia : No, I like it here. Besides I hate suggestions. Tell Madame\nBarouffska that I have come on a most unimportant matter which will pro-\nbably detain me a very long time.\nButtercups : Yes, I often think that it is only unimportant matters that\nare really momentous. What is this one, if I may ask ?\nAurelia : I have forgotten.\nButtercups : Perhaps then it was really important.\nAurelia : So it was ! So it was ! I remember now I wanted to ask her\nhow she likes matrimony.\nButtercups : Caesar ! You are not collecting data on the subject, are you i"}, {"page_pdf": 74, "page_imprimee": "255", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.74", "texte": "Aureua (treacherously innocent) : You wouldn't wish me to take leaps\nin the dark, would you ?\nButtercups : Certainly I would. Certainly I do — since you are to\ntake them with me.\nAureua [same wicked look) : What a beautiful nature you have !\nButtercups : I'll tell you what matrimony is, two souls with but a single\nthought.\nAureua : Yes. Two souls with half a thought apiece. There is real\nbliss !\nButtercups (snarling) :Oh come, now! If you turn everything into\nridicule.\nAureua [dreamily) : I asked the duchess, and she said.\nButtercups : The old harridan !\nAureua : You know her manner. (imitating her.) My dear, matrimony\nis three months of adoration, three months of introspection, thirty years of\ntoleration — with the children to begin it all over.\nButtercups [frowning) : A rather voluminous definition.\nAureua : Rather luminous I should call it.\nButtercups : While you were at it, it's a pity you did not ask her what\nlove is.\nAureua : Parsnips ! You'll never believe it ! She asked me !\nButtercups [glowering): Mistook you for an expert. What did you say ?\nAureua : I said, that while from studies and statistics I was inclined\nto believe that, theoretically, love is a fermentation of the molecules of the ima-\ngination, actually it is the affection of somebody else.\nButtercups : I don't understand that.\nAureua : I added that from the same studies and statistics I was also\ninclined to believe that love is the tragedy of those who lack it, the boredom\nthose who don't.\nButtercups: Eh? I don't understand that either.\nAureua : I further stated that love is a specific emotion, more or less\nexclusive in selection, more — or less — permanent in duration and due\nto a mental disturbance, in itself caused by a law of attraction which some-\nbody or other said was the myth of happiness, invented by the devil for men's\ndespair.\nButtercups [groaning) : I don't understand that at all.\nAureua : Violet said she didn't either.\nButtercups : Now there's a woman of sense.\nAureua : Xyeilah Baouffska said she did understand, so I may suppose\nthat she is stupid."}, {"page_pdf": 75, "page_imprimee": "256", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.75", "texte": "Buttercups: No doubt, she does seem to have made a mess of things.\nWhy now did she leave her first husband ?\nAurEUA : It is not a thing I could mention.\nButtercups : What ?\nAurEUA (;perversely) : She caught him in the act, [Appearing to blush.)\nWith her own eyes she saw him eating fish with his knife.\nSurely, this dialog with its wit and epigrammatic quality can be read\nin the same evening with Congreve or Wilde.\nSaltus's diction, then, has clarity, brilliant figures, sensuous appeal, rhythm,\npersonal accent and wit. With this sharp, polished, jewel-encrusted dagger\nhe carved out thirty odd books whose range from translation through fiction,\nliterary criticism and historical panoramas to philosophy proclaims the author\na versatile talent in possession of a well-digested general culture.\nIn his short stories and novels Saltus uses mechanized plots and mechan-\nized characters with ingenious variations. Stripped of all but a synoptic\nverbiage, his stories appeal to the same naivete in us which makes \" mystery \"\nor detective stories so popular. Iyike the latter, \" The Truth about Tristrem\nVaiick \" or \" The Paliser Case \" utilized the lassoo of suspense to pull us to\nthe finis. Like them, Saltus offers little psychological dissection, none of the\nthrobbing immensities of life, no third dimension of art as we are tugged along.\nBut his entertainment is vastly better. He adorns our suspense with sulphur-\nous language, he nearly drains off the cruelty and perversity in us, he never\nrepeats himself as a virtuoso of the shudder. He is a Petronius in his percep-\ntion of the art of suicide, a Wainwright in the aesthetic employment of crime —\nin sum, a Grand Marshal of the Pomps of Satan. He takes very few and then\nvery brief philosophical excursions in his fiction, but his attitude towards the\nuniverse has been profoundly acquired and its presence in the author, although\napparently excluded from his fiction, does give added weight to his wiry struc-\ntures. Saltus is saturated with Hindoo philosophy and is a thorough disciple\nof Schopenhauer and Hartmann. In \" The Philosophy of Disenchantment \"\nand \" The Anatomy of Negation \" he has written two compact readable and\nscholarly resumes of pessimism and of skepticism — perhaps the best hand-\nbooks ever published on these subjects. I quote the final paragraphs of \" The\nAnatomy of Negation \" in order to indicate clearly the philosophical position\nof the mind which devises such delightful fiction.\n\" There is no help there, nor is there any elsewhere. The Orient is asleep\nin the ashes of her gods. The star of Ormuzd has burned out in the skies. On\nthe banks of her sacred seas, Greece, hushed for evermore, rests on the divine\nlimbs of her white immortals. In the sepulchre of the pale Nazarene, humanity\nguards its last divinity. Every promise is unfulfilled. There is no light save"}, {"page_pdf": 76, "page_imprimee": "257", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.76", "texte": "perchance in death. One torture more, one more throb of the heart, and after\nit nothing. The grave opens, a little flesh falls in, and the weeds of forgetful-\nness which soon hide the tomb grow eternally above its vanities. And still\nthe voice of the living, of the just and of the unjust, of kings, of felons and of\nbeasts, will be raised unsilenced, until humanity, unsatisfied as before and yet\nimpatient for the peace which life has disturbed, is tossed at last, with its shat-\ntered globe and forgotten gods, to fertilize the furrows of where worlds\nferment.\n\"On this vista the curtain may be drawn. Neither poet nor seer can\nlook beyond. Nature, who is unconscious in her immorality, entrancing in\nher beauty, savage in her cruelty, imperial in her prodigality, and appalling\nin her convulsions, is not only deaf, but dumb. There is no answer to any\nappeal. The best we can do, the best that has ever been done, is to recognize\nthe implacability of the laws that rule the universe, and contemplate as calmly\nas we can the nothingness from which we are come and into which we shall\nall disappear. The one consolation we hold, though it is one which may be\nillusory too, consists in the belief that when death comes, fear and hope are\nat an end. Then wonder ceases ; the insoluble no longer perplexes ; space is\nlost ; the infinite is blank ; the farce is done.\"\nSuch a vision of the universe requires a drastic escape. Schopenhauer\nrecommended compassion, others have countered with irony. Saltus says :\nFirst, health ; second, indifference. His pessimism permeates him, his indif-\nference cloaks him — almost. His preoccupation with cruelty, with the ten-\nsions of mental agonies, with the bloody nightmares of history lifts one corner\nof the cloak and the question occurs : Is Edgar Saltus a sadistic artist, is his\npessimism fed by a furtive delight in the spectacle of mankind's sufferings ?\nCertainly, the spectacular cinematographic histories he has written of the\nCaesars and the Tsars were congenial tasks. His fiction may remain second-\nhand book-stall quarry for the curious but the \" Imperial Purple \" and \" The\nImperial Orgy \" should last as long as \" The Philosophy of Disenchantment \"\nand \" The Anatomy of Negation : \" the former two definitively capture the\ntheatrical qualities of the corrupt Roman and Russian lineages in a scintillat-\ning prose. Not the least wonder about Saltus is his consummate ability to\nreduce whole libraries of yawns into two hundred pages of compact excitement.\nAt the age of eighteen Saltus wrote a monograph on Balzac, the value\nof which is not wholly spoiled by his acceptance of the Balzac legend in toto.\nIndeed, the searchlight had not lit up so relentlessly then as it has\nsince the soft spots -in the legend. In 1917, a subscription printer brought\nout \" Oscar Wilde : An Idler's Impression,\" a brochure which establishes\nSaltus's ability to write with charm and discrimination on other authors. He"}, {"page_pdf": 77, "page_imprimee": "258", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.77", "texte": "includes intimate gossip, stores up some interesting anecdotes and renders an\nexcellent tribute to Wilde.\nBecause of the scarcity of this book, I leave criticism momentarily to quote\nan anecdote. Saltus had been invited to Tite Street for dinner. Upon his\narrival, he was surprised to find no other guests and the house apparently\nunfestive. Wilde met him in the drawing-room and drawled : \" This is delightful\nof you. I have been late for dinner a half hour, again a whole hour. You\nare late an entire week. That is what I call originality.\" Saltus responded with\nan invitation to dine with him. Oscar remarked on accepting : \" I have the\nsimplest tastes. lam always satisfied with the best.\" Interesting also is Saltus's\nestimate of O. W. \" Wilde was a third rate poet who occasionally rose to the se-\ncond class but not once to the first. Prose is more difficult than verse and in\nit he is rather sloppy... In talk he blinded, and it is the subsiding wonder of\nit that his plays contain. \"\nReturning to an estimate of Saltus, let us sum up by saying we have in\nhim a temperament saturated with pessimism which expresses itself by the\nbeautiful decoration of sinister themes. To see grandeurs in vast horrors is\nthe last thing a commonplace person can do. Neither can commonplace\npersons accumulate effortlessly a legend about themselves. This Edgar Saltus\nhas done. The recorded facts are his birth in New York in 1858, his education\nhere and at the Sorbonne, his visits to European capitals, his three marriages,\nhis wealth and its loss, and his long succession of books. In his work are many\ngrains of pollen from the great pessimists and from Balzac and Gautier.\nRumor goes on to elaborate upon his recluse habits, his gigantic indifference\nto the ordinary concerns of man, his Balzacian hours of work and his Balzacian\ntheory that the artist must carry his sex in his brain. A glamorous romantic\npersonality who has been enveloped in the limbo partly because of his disdain for\njournalistic advertising but mainly because the prevalent attitude of the literary\nmoguls in the period in which he wrote most of his books was that which is\ngiven concretely in the following excerpts on \" The Daughters of the Rich.\"\n\"It is strange that a practised hand like that of Mr. Saltus should have\nreleased to any mark but the waste basket a thing that suggests, both in tone\nand style, a muddy-minded schoolboy's first attempts to imitate De Maupas-\nsant.\" The Nation Jl. 1/09 (Paul Elmer More, literary editor).\nToday he is still submerged because our aggressive seekers for a virile\nAmerican Literature find him too exotic, too Gallic, let us say. But we can\nno more control literary cross-currents than we can keep the wind from spread-\ning pollen far and wide. The English do not reject Arnold Ben net because\nhe has learned much from the French novel. Why must we proclaim only\nthe impossibly pure-blooded ? Why have we not, as other nations have, room"}, {"page_pdf": 78, "page_imprimee": "259", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.78", "texte": "in our literature for strange flora and fauna ? Edgar Saltus has admittedly\nbeen greatly influenced by European art, but he has not imitated to the point\nwhere his idiosyncracies vanish. His work is his own.\nTo read Saltus is to take a showerbath of jewels. But it is not to explore\na great ocean with thousand-league currents and wide treasure caves of gold.\nFor that we can turn to William Vaughn Moody.\nIII.\nThe experience of reading the poetry of Moody is rich and full. His gor-\ngeous imagery and color, his flexible lines with their delicacy and music, his\ndramatic sense, his studious control with its suggestion of untapped reserves\nof power are strengthened by a well developed and unusually strong interior\norganization. By interior organization I mean what painters call a third dimen-\nsional solidity and what Willard Huntington Wright calls documentary solidity\nin literature. Moody knew how to make aesthetic use of his passion, greater\nemotions, proud rebelliousness and philosophy : he knew how to fuse them with.\nhis design so that its elements took on body, became firm, modelled, and\nweighty, and yet preserved their balanced motion.\nIt is curious that some aspects of the interior organization of Moody's\npoetry should not have attracted critics like Van Wyck Brooks and Waldo\nFrank who are raking back and forth over American literature to create a usable\npast. It is curious that there should have been only one exemplar of Young\nAmerica who has written about him. In 1914, in the Little Review, George\nSoule said : \" Here, surely, is an American poet who speaks in eternal terms\nof the new inspiration ; one who was sane and blazing at the same time ; one\nwho in order to be modern did not need to use a poor imitation of Whitman,\nscreech of boiler factories and exalt a somewhat doubtful brand of democracy ;\none who was uncompromisingly radical without being feverish ; above all, one\nwho succeeded in writing the most beautiful verse without going to London\nto do it. When one is oppressed with the doubt of American possibilities it is\na renewal of faith to turn to him, If Whitman is of our soil, is no less\nso ; through these two the best in us has so far found its individual expression.\"\nThere are three aspects of Moody that should attract young Americans of\nthis school.\nHe was, first of all, a doubter. For him, as for us, the old gods had been\nshattered and he was profoundly groping for new ones. He had no facile op-\ntimism : he did not know whether God was in his heaven and Pangloss was right :\nhe did not know even that imperialists in China and the Phillippines were right\n(in fact, his patriotism, took a very eloquent stand against them). More reli-"}, {"page_pdf": 79, "page_imprimee": "260", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.79", "texte": "gious than any contemporary, he contemplated Christ with wistful eyes and\nthen half-turned away. The road to Calvary lacked completely satisfying\norchestration for this questing adventurous pilgrim who winged his doubts\nwith a strong hopefulness.\nSecondly, Moody had a vivid sense of social sin. It is a thought of Randolph\nBourne's that our ancestors suffered from personal sin, we from social wrongs.\nThere was rebellion in the very base of Moody's soul against the degradation\nof mankind by the machiiie, there was superb anger against the captains of\nearth, reckless, aghast, gorged, who battened the hatches on souls, cursing,\nsighing, distraught and sad, there was wonderment at the social inequalities\nof the time. Here then we have another sensitive spirit recoiling from the\nwholesale sadisms of our present industrial organization.\nThird, Moody worked out a great synthesis for himself, the outline perhaps\nof a future religion. It was a philosophical union of Pan and Christ, a harmony\nof Pan's lust of living and beauty-madnesses with the gentle anarchic brotherhood\nof man of the romantic Jesus. Moody was pagan to a delightful degree, but\nhe could not accept gladiatorial shows and slavery. He was Christian in many\nof his outlooks, but the laughing earth and libidinous liotous man must be af-\nfirmed. His culture was of both Greece and Nazareth and most fittingly has\nSoule called him \" a great pilgrim-pagan.\" His perfect physical endowment,\nhis firm intellect, his stout heart, his gift of artistry, his vital erudition, his\nquestioning religious soul gave him such fulness of life as rarely comes to anyone in\na generation of Americans. He was a bachanalian, an artist, a lover : he wor-\nshipped Bacchus, Apollo, Eros. And these, I suggest, are the gods America needs.\nAll this is in Moody's work but he carried it as an artist. His doubts and\nindignations and philosophy disengage themselves for us from an aesthetic\nexperience. His projections were deep but his surfaces were proportioned. At\npresent the greatest relevance is an exhortation to read the Poems and Poetic\nDramas and it is to reinforce my urgency that I list May Sinclair, Robert Morss\nLovett, Ridgely Torrence and Edwin Arlington Robinson as admirers of\nthis poet.\nHe died in 1910. The era of experimentation and achievement in vers\nlibre followed hard after and doubtless distracted attention from Gloucester\nMoors and The Masque of Judgment. Yet culture is traditional as well as insati-\nable for departures, and it is not rash to predict a growing discovery of a man\nwho worked traditional metrical poetry into a complex • full toned organ for\nhimself, an organ distinguishable from that of any other poet. His poetry\nis a splendid fruition after which young American poets might well turn to\nrevolt and experiment.\n\nGorham B. Munson"}, {"page_pdf": 80, "page_imprimee": "261", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.80", "texte": "DEDICATED TO THE ENEMY.\n\n(icontinued)\n\nIX\nThe Business man is an essential to any Theatre. But it is a mistake, .. .\na fatal one for which everyone has to pay . . . when he is at the head of a\nTheatre \\\nFor try how we may to attribute to him qualifications as head, we cannot\nadmit that he understands the difference between a good play, a very good\nplay, and a foolish play : neither can we allow that his judgment is sound in so\nfar as eye and ear are concerned or that he has what we call good taste. That\nis not part of his Business — how should it be ?\nThe Business man has one object — to make a thing pay. It is necessary\nto a modern theatre that it should pay — it should pay its way anyhow, and\nafter that provide for a rainy day.\nThe money which comes in from the public should not go into the pockets\nof shareholders. It should return to the Public, .. . and in this manner :. . .\nEach year's profit should be spent on Improvement of the Theatre :\nEnlargement of the Theatre: Development of its capacity to delight, instruct,\nand satisfy the Public.\nA School should be added to the Theatre : a library, a museum :. . . (some\nfew theatres have fairly good libraries and museums, but the schools are not\ngood). Each Theatre should have its own Pension Fund for its most faith-\nful adherents.\nIf there was enough to spare, it should devote a yearly sum to helping other\nless successful theatres in extremity.\n1 I will go so far as to say it has proved THE fatal mistake — and it is has been\nslowly ruining the whole European and American Dramatic Art for the past hundred\nyears.\nIt is now just a hundred years since Napoleon died: Byron is exiled : and the com-\nmonplace is found to be a relief to all true (and egoistical) democrats. The golden mean\nof a pinchbeck age."}, {"page_pdf": 81, "page_imprimee": "262", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.81", "texte": "There are very many ways in which the money could be made to benefit\nthe Public and the Art at the same time.\nAll I insist on is that shareholders should not profit, for that merely for-\nces a business man to the head of affairs, and very properly his sole thought\nis for his shareholders .. . Oh! he will talk very noble language, giving us\nthe usual catchpenny phrases about his working solely for the Public's benefit :\nbut that he cannot do this is clear, for his is a mind which is unable to com-\nprehend what will benefit anyone except his shareholders.\nThe practice of having a business man at the head is widespread in England.\nIt makes it abominably difficult for the actors and for artists to make headway.\nIt is a very grave pity.\nSometimes a so-called \" artist \" acts the business man. There are a few\nsuch \"artists \" in London and in control at central theatres.\nWhat they give us may be called \" the grandest show ever known on earth, \"\nand it may even be a good slapdash show, . . . but to run it for their sharehold-\ners and not to put all profits to benefit Public and Playhouse and the Per-\nformers is wrong as it can be.\nSo it comes to it that neither a quite honest business man nor the dishon-\nest \" artist \" ought to be in the position of head of a theatre.\nI wish Law and Order — the Powers which be — and not only the powers\nwhich may be before long, could see such simple matters as these in their\ntrue light.\nX\nTo the Egoist\nYou have reason to be desperate, my dear confrere, if impelled by ambi-\ntion, and governed by your ego, you attempt to be what you call the \" Napo-\nleon of the Theatre \". . . or the \" Catherine of the Stage. \" Because your\naffair should be your Art, and I think that the less of an organizer you are,\nthe less you will come to despair.\nIf before your art is seen by your contemporaries. . . the mob ... or the\nPublic, you are obliged to push, to advertise to engage what our dear cousins\ncall \" barkers, \" you are putting upon yourself a strain which you are not called\nto put upon yourself.\nSuppose you have some push in you — which in your egoism you call\nwill, — and suppose we exalt it to the heights and honour it with the name of\nAction, what is all your action really worth in this field of Art ?"}, {"page_pdf": 82, "page_imprimee": "263", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.82", "texte": "You value it evidently, and the Public — your Public — values it. But\nthat is has true value is very doubtful. In fact, we may be pretty well sure\nthat it is not worth a fig. That's the worst of it: — would to goodness it was\nas easy as that.\nBurnt up, transformed, translated, transmuted into something really val-\nuable to the artist, and you cease altogether from action. You are not to\ndo as Napoleon does but as Beethoven does and as Mozart does. Remember\nthat Wagner was just what you admire — a colossal figure in the world of Art .. .\nbut by the side of Beethoven and Mozart he cuts a very poor figure — no ?\nAnd the term \" the Napoleon of the Theatre, \" although we know what\nit signifies, is not at all a happy one ; for Napoleon would have been the last\nman, had he chosen to conquer in the field of Art and disregard all other fields, . . .\nhe would have been the last man to waste his strength organizing — pushing —\nNapoleonizing. He would have followed Mozart's lead.\nNapoleon as artist would have wasted no energy guiding people, dominat-\ning human society, showing impatience when restrained, brooking no rivals,\ncontemptuous towards those who refused to render him homage, looking on\nthe world as a great banquet open to any comer and where long arms are the\nmain necessity, grabbing the sign of the highest excellence, and to the devil\nwith the others.\nIt seems to me that you sometimes do in a little way what Napoleon would\nnever have done even in a big way had he been the artist you are;. .. what\nBeethoven never did, nor Mozart; what Wagner through his work shall suffer\nfor having done.\nRule out ambition of that kind from your programme altogether.. . and\nyou'll feel twice as strong and achieve ten times as much. Already you know\nthey speak of you as Napoleonic — awfully dangerous.\nYou are probably just as impatient as the great men and women have\nbeen ; you are probably an epileptic in a mild way. Be reasonable and direct\nthis force that is more than you, in the way it will most profit us, your fellow\nmen — and yourself. Artist — Egoist.... think of yourself, I beg of you.\nYou need not be an altruist to do that. It would become you better to\nbe a treble egoist. . . but have sense .. . show method in your madness. Put\nthe right saddle on the back of your Pegasus, and don't, oh don't, put it hind-\nside-fore.\nThese \" Napoleons, \" dear Reader, the Napoleons of the Theatre always\ncome into existence because they get muddled early in life and imagine that an\nartist is a man of action.\nBut what has Art to do with Action, or what the deuce is the ass thinking\nof who calls on an artist to be a man of action ?"}, {"page_pdf": 83, "page_imprimee": "264", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.83", "texte": "Leonardo da Vinci, Shakespeare, Moli£re, Beethoven, Mozart, ... do these\nnames suggest to such a great ass — anything ?\nLet me help the great ass.\nThese artist had Patrons .. . who acted for them. These Patrons supplied\nthe funds .. . How ? Let me suggest a little more by a few more names ... .\nThe Duke of Milan ; the Earl of Leicester ; Louis XIV ; the Cardinal at Salzburg\n(one forgets his name) ; and the little Prince Lichnowsky.\nThere in their order, five patrons to five supreme artists . . . were men of\naction — of paltry action. The five artists were not (my dear and patient ass)\nmen of action at all .. . Have you understood ?\nOur Theatres have lately somehow been clogged with men of action, Na-\npoleons of the Stage.\nOpen the doors — let them and their glorious self-importance escape ...\nor we shall have a thousand little Napoleons.\nWhat we have been working for years in our Movement Towards a New\nTheatre is to grow Artists not Men of Action. For it is easier to produce five\nhundred men of action than one artist.\nA man of action is a fine thing anywhere except where the Arts are to\nthrive. He may hover around, he may even show his remarkable powers\nof action by ordering a cathedral or two, a theatre or two, but he must not put\nfoot in our workshop.\nWe are patient sort of madmen, we artist-workmen, but we have oubliettes\nclose to our work tables.\nGentlemen posing as Patrons, as men of action, as connoisseurs, have thou-\nsands of times come meddling too near the table and have been known to disap-\npear suddenly.\nWho was that great fool at Salzburg who posed as being the Patron of\nMozart ? I forget who he was, but I know where he is. He is down an ou-\nbliette.\nThe Earl of Leicester, who failed to build Shakespeare a decent theatre —\nwhere is he ? The Patron of Beethoven, that poor Prince lichnowsky, where\nis he ? . . . \" in our memory locked \" down an oubliette and drowned every time\nwe think of him in our laughter ... a farce of a fool.\nI am making a list (I would give it here but it requires more time to make\nit quite complete), of the hundred or two hundred artists whose work we have\nhad and in some cases still have, and short facts as to their sustenance . . . and\ntheir patrons.\nI wish to show by this list that if there are fifty fine artists who are as\npoor as was Mozart, there are fifty who were as rich as Rubens ; and that\nthis being the case it is an exaggeration for Lord Rosebery to assert that"}, {"page_pdf": 84, "page_imprimee": "265", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.84", "texte": "\" Genius thrives on Poverty and Ait is smothered by riches. \" Because some\nGreek writer said so before Lord Rosebery polished up the phrase for some\nmeeting whereat everyone wept and crowed over the death of Robert Burns\nis no special matter. There are some lies which even started in Greece ... Ben-\nvenuto's old proverb \" cats of good breed hunt better fat than lean \" is as apt\nto-day as when the Pope first heard it from old Cellini and made a bold effort\nto look less mean than he was.\nBut because Patrons betray us — because we be poor — this is no reason\nfor becoming \" men of action, \" \" Napoleons of the stage. \" Our instinct on\nreceiving a letter from Ours faithfully our Patron to tell us that he is sorry he\ncannot help us . . . (that is to say, our work) . . . that though he promised us two\nor three thousand a year to help the work he now regrets that owing to some\none having persuaded his weakness to act differently .. . e. to break his word .. .\nhe must now stop sending the sums he ladled out grudgingly month by month1\n. our instinct on getting such a letter is to turn business man, is it not ? To\nbecome men of action, — to be free from such fellows. If that were possible —\nto be business man and artist, well and good : but it don't work — it really\ndon't. No, the artist must remember that it is as possible to be backed by a\nwrong 'un as it is to back a wrong un. If the artist is of no use at all; if\nhe is not able to create, lacking in vision and skill to express, then he is indeed\na poor horse to back: — but say he has all the powers we expect an artist to\nhave, then if things go ill he can assuredly claim to have been backed by\na wrong' un — and wait for another event.\nMy point is that whatever betide, the artist must never change his mind —\nit must be the mind of the artist once and for ever. Never the man of action,\nnever the impresario, never the Napoleon of the Arts.\n1 I was told last month of just such a patron of the arts ... an Englishman . . . who\nis one of the very wealthiest Lords of Great Britain, who used to dole out month by\nmonth his promised support, . . . but listen, . . . only after he had received two letters\nof reminder, a telegram, and sometimes a telephone message per month. . . Incredible but\ntrue.\n\nGordon Craig\n\n(To be concluded)."}, {"page_pdf": 85, "page_imprimee": "266", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.85", "texte": "MADE IN AMERICA\n\nThe cost of living in Europe becomes very cheap for Americans because\nof the high dollar exchange. Boatloads of Americans, therefore, transport\nthemselves to Europe and, basking in its milder climate, blossoming under\nits floods of beer and wine, conceive a new culture which is entirely contrary\nto all the tendencies which burgeon between San Diego and Bangor. They\n\" hate \" the United States, nation of bad taste, shorn of liberty, ungentle to\ntheir paranoias and inhibitions.\nIn Paris they are subject to the precise influences of the glittering French\nmind. Good Heavens ! America is now all the rage here : the American ci-\nnema, American shoes, skyscrapers, business methods, even American drinks.\nThey hastily turn a somersault and proceed to reconstruct a United States\nexperienced from a safe distance of three thousand miles through European\nspy-glasses . . .\nA very plausible thesis, this of Mr. IyOeb. However, it is assumed a priori\nthat the Americans in Montparnasse are in a certain accord in their decisions\non matters of art and of ethics. In reality, the Americans who have poured\ninto Paris impress one with their bewildering ranges of mediocrity. For the most\npart, they seldom speak French, never read the literary reviews published in\nParis, and isolate themselves so completely with their compatriots in an expa-\ntriated and vicious American milieu that there is scarcely any liaison with\nFrench ideas.\nThere are, of course, a few men living in Paris (not necessarily in Mont-\nparnasse) whose capacities one respects but whose reactions to and affinities\nwith the French literature of the day are remarkably different. Artists simply\nwill not herd. It can no more be said of these men that they echo a French\nart under American influences than it can be said that all American writers\nare headed for the diffuse subjective naturalism that has recently been crown-\ned in New York.\nMr. lyoeb's observations on the American literary scene, proper, seem per-\nfectly just. There is a dreadful lack of clarity among the critics of the \" ad-\nvanced \" journals. The \" iconoclastic spirit \" still roars about, still rants at Pur-\nitanism, asserts that American husbands are occasionally prompted to infld-"}, {"page_pdf": 86, "page_imprimee": "267", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.86", "texte": "elity, or that vers libre is a perfectly justifiable form of poetry. Writers who\ngive a \" cross-section of life \" are rendered a helping hand in Vanity Fairt Prizes\nare awarded to persons who write sincere but wretched verses about the\nA. E. F. .. . Sic ! Occasionally a self-conscious interest is evinced in some-\nthing that is more exotic : in de Gourmont, for instance. Quite by way of\nsnobism.\nI have become convinced that the whole foul morass of all this is due to the\ndesire, naive enough, to vulgarize literature in America.\nCertain individuals launch a pretentious magazine which is designed to\nsupport and publish pure literature. (Loud applause). Within a year they\nhave succeeded in gravitating toward something solid and nourishing, something\nonly a shade different from Harpers' or the Atlantic Montly. Vulgarization,\neclecticism. Give the best French, Russian, German minds to the PEOPIJb !\n(\" It is to the creation of an attentive an 4 critical environment that the Dial s\naward testifies And elsewhere something to the effect that \"we would\nonly be doing half our duty \" if we did not heed the other half).\nThis is the risk we run in attempting with Mr. lyoeb to \" bridge the sepa-\nration between 'highbrow ' and 'lowbrow ' which isolates the artist from the\ncommunity. \"\nThere is a larger audience, to be sure, for the artist in Paris. But the true\nartist here is not fooled by this fact into compromise. I have been assured\nagain and again by young writers that the gulf between the great public and them-\nselves is wider than ever before. These conditions are due on the one hand io the sus-\npicion and bigotry that are the wake of war, and on the other hand 10 the pro-\nhibitive efforts of some of the influential literary journals toward vulgarization.\nUnder these conditions the avant-garde is even more intransigent than ever in\nits isolation from the public of the press and the theatre.\nBy 1918, thirty years of symbolist poetry, fifty or sixty evenly matched\npoets had nearly all been laid asunder. The hundreds of volumes of painfully\nwrought verses for which Remy de Gourmont was the spokesman become too\ntiresome to be intelligible. Henry de Regnier, Paul Pott, Pernand Gregh, and\na host of Academicians may be read in the daily press or in La Revue de Paris,\nbut they do not cross our trail.\nIt is Andre Gide who emerged from the war with the strongest literary\nfollowing. Gide, an extraordinary personality, together with Jaques Riviere built\nup the Nouvelle Revue Frangaise, the centre, if you will, of French letters to-\nday. Its characteristics were at once the art-egoism of Gide, mirrored in such\nkindred spirits as Jean Girandoux, Paul Morand, Valery Ivarbaud, and the\ndiverse mysticism, at once, of Francis James, of Jules Romains, of Andre Suares,\nof Paul Claudel. The indefatigable Marcel Proust is ranged with them. The N."}, {"page_pdf": 87, "page_imprimee": "268", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.87", "texte": "R. F., in short, has represented no one tendency. It has been eclectic to the\npoint of inviting members of the Dada group to contribute, in its fear of not\nseeming catholic enough. It has been sagaciously directed, has reached\na wide public, and serves the excellent purpose which the Mercure de France\ndid ten years ago. Its crystallization ad absurdum was attained last winter\nwith the establishment of a school for the instruction of young poets under the\nguidance of Jules Romains.\nIt would scarcely be fair, then, to regard the N. R. F. as the wing of French\nletters that offers something novel or corrupting. For the rest, Andre Sal-\nmon and Max Jacob, allied as they are with Cubism, are the exponents of a mo-\ndernity which was purely of the moment and ended with yesterday. Girau-\ndoux and Morand are whimsical and ironical enough but it is a rather facile\nmanner at bottom. All these are the men who have largely attracted atten-\ntion abroad, and who, Mr. Iyoeb suspects, may have persuaded some of the Amer-\nican writers in Paris into a revaluation of their homeland.\nVery little, then, is offered in the way of nourishment for the American quester\nof literary gold. In spite of the appearance of a number of impressive look-\ning revues and the surprisingly strong industrial support of art, the present\nhour is not an auspicious one for French letters. It is a moment perhaps, of too\ngreat transition. The writers who have been conspicuously presented are\ntoo obviously small talents, excessively mannered, using a paltry mask of\nmodernity.\nJean Cocteau is a typical case. Trumpeted as the last word in modern\ndeviltry, this man has almost succeeded in confusing and diverting whatever\nattention the public has been disposed to give to the newer art movements.\nHis has been the glaring example of the cheap and offensive shifts for shocking\nthe bourgeois which Mr. Iyoeb condemns. The method in his poetry has simply\nbeen to make un-musical and irritating verses which refer to expresses, steam-\nboats, aeroplanes, the unconscious, the rubber heel, etcetera, thereby bringing\nhis wiitirigs squarely up to 1922 ! He is again a clever man, occasionally\nworth listening to in the prose medium, although his poetry leaves a perfect\nblank in the brain.\nThere is still a small determined faction to turn to far younger men who have\nneither attained their ripest growth nor been accepted in the name of authentic\nliterature. To an American who has been intensely conscious of his environ-\nment during the first quarter of this century and the trend of American life,\nthe spirit and tentatives of this left wing indicate a striking departure from the\nother currents.\nThe stimulus came directly out of the brain of the Comte de Iyautreamont,\nwho chanted in his Poesies preface : \" Man is great and his greatness consists"}, {"page_pdf": 88, "page_imprimee": "269", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.88", "texte": "ill that he will not know himself miserable !!. . . Greatness refutes sorrow.\nMy thoughts are unchained. The heart of man is a book I have learned to\nesteem.\n\" Man is the conqueror of chimeras, the novelty of tomorrow, the order\nthat rules chaos. . . He judges all things. He is the depository of truth, the\ncollector of certitudes, the glory not the butt of the universe. ...\"\nOut of Iyautreamont and Rimbaud came the stimulus toward an affirm-\native Promethean attitude. The whole nineteenth centurv erred, according\nmf ' O\nto Iyautreamont, in that its literature echoed and re-echoed the note of doubt,\ndespair, and humility, instead of affirmation, self-assertion and human triumph\nover nature which embody the actual achievements of that century. The\n'90s were even more sterile in their refinement of skepticism, sickness and ennui.\nThe young men who at the close of the War courageously advanced these\nideas as the basis for a new art in the pages of Litterature during 1919-21 are\nthe present left wing of French letters referred to above. Iyouis Aragon, Andre\nBreton, Paul Eluard, Philippe Soupault, Tristan Tzara have been producing\nprose and poetry since the close of the War which sought a mood of humor\ninstead of pathos, aggression instead of doubt, and complete freedom of me-\nthod for tire restrictions of the previous age.\nIt matters little that this movement encompassed Badaism which frighten-\ned and offended so many, nor that Dada is unquestionably dead. A strong\nimpetus has been given to unlimited experiment with form, to a greater daring\nand a more penetrating humor. Apollinaire, who at the time of his unfortun-\nate death was close to these young writers, urged them to the greatest\npossible liberties. To be at least as daring as the mechanical geniuses of the\nage which has attained the veritable realization of the miracles forecast in\nprimitive fables. To be the prophets alike, the fable-makers for the incre-\ndible ages to come !\nThe machine is not \" flattening us out \" nor \" crushing us. \" The machine\nis our magnificent slave, our fraternal genius. We are a new and hardier\nrace, friend to the sky-scraper and the subterranean railway as well.\nWe are at home under the sea as well as in the air, and we can sing\nand laugh as heartily under these .transformed conditions. The whole scene,\nstrangely enough is much more provocative of mirth than of condemnation.\nThe work of these younger men makes no bow to the public. Liberat-\ned as they are from all tendencies to make the public a little more \" highbrow \"\nand themselves a little more \" lowbrow, \" they carry prose and poetry into\nnew roles. The novels of Aragon, Anicet and Telemaque obey the requisites\nof poetry for music, color, freedom of movement. Les Champs Magnetiques\nin which Breton and Soupault collaborated is a novel without plot or characters."}, {"page_pdf": 89, "page_imprimee": "270", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.89", "texte": "The poems of Eluard are written in prose rather than in verses, but they\nare not Poemes en prose. There is place here to indicate little else than that\nthese men who may well have their best work yet before them are confirmed\nexplorers who are turning up fresh soil. From a purely philological point\nof view their experiments with argot, with profanity, with the unconscious\nzones in natural speech mark them apart from their contemporaries. The\nFrench language becomes less thin and pellucid, gains body and richness.\nSo much, briefly, for their technique. We can scaicely follow them\nin these directions. Our language tendencies are Elizabethan. And in Amer-\nica there has been an equal groping toward purer forms of literature in iso-\nlated corners, here and there among younger writers.\nWitnessing as we are the gradual Americanization of the Eastern Hemi-\nsphere, it would surely be a strange surrender of our prerogatives to imitate\nEurope, or Paris, for that matter. The fundamental attitude of aggression,\nhumor, unequivocal affirmation which they pose, comes most naturally from\nAmerica. The high speed and tension of American life may have been exported\nin quantity to Europe. But we are still richest in material. Our preposterous\nnaive profound film will never be surpassed by artistic or literary German\ncinemas. No cities will quite equal what New York or Chicago or Tulsa have.\nWe have only to roll a great big boulder over all the little American au-\nthor-insects who are still imitating a discredited French naturalism of fifty\nyears ago. We have only to free ourselves of fixed ideas as to how a prose-\nstory or a verse-poem should be written. Reacting to purely American sour-\nces, to the at once bewildering and astounding American panorama, which only\nChaplin and a few earnest unsung film-directors have mirrored, we may yet\namass a new folk-lore out of the domesticated miracles of our time.\n\nMatthew Josephson"}, {"page_pdf": 90, "page_imprimee": "271", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.90", "texte": "COMMENT\n• We have received the first number of Secession a new literary review publish-\ned by Gorham B. Munson in Vienna. According to the editorial pronounce-\nment, Secession exists for those who are preoccupied with researches for new\nforms. One of its collaborators writes that Secession can really be a pretty good\norgan, because, after all, the sky is its limit. Broom wishes every success\nto its young contemporary which, at least, will not be hindered by lack of room.\nThe first number aligns itself in a general way with Post-Dadaism. Tris-\ntan Tzara and Aragon collaborate in translations. Malcolm Cowley,\nMatthew Josephson, Will Bray and the editor contribute the American portion.\nThe responsibility for the review is laid in part upon the Dial in an expose\nwhich closes : \" The existence of this Yale-Review-in-a-Harvard-blazer is one\nof the bitter necessities calling for Secession.\nSince Cezanne. By Cuvß Beu, (Chatto and Windus, js. net).\nMr. Bell continues emphatically to assert, and finds a remarkable number\nof different ways in which to reiterate, that significant form is the one essential\nproperty of a work of art. His position has become less confident, however,\nwith the passing years, for the old Clive Bell would never have asked u I do not\ndisbelieve in absolute beauty : only, can we recognize it ? \"\nIf we remember rightly, once upon a time Mr. Bell was not only sure of his\nown ability to recognize it, but also of the capacity in this direction of all\nsensitive humans as well.\nSince Cezanne well accomplishes its stated purpose. \"To put the public\nin the way of aesthetic pleasure. \"\nIn the May number of Broom an error occurred in our acknowledgement of\nE pur si muove. The author of this book, a study of the constructive bases\nof the various aesthetic trends of Europe, is Mr. Elie Ehrenburg. The inter-\nnational magazine of modern art, with which we confused it, is L'Ob jet published\nby Russians in Berlin, under the direction of El Lissitzky and Elie Ehrenburg.\nThe new magazine outlines its purposes in a long manifesto written in three\nlanguages. To quote in part: —\n\" The appearance of UOb jet is a symptom of the exchange of experiences which\nis recommencing between the young artisans of Russia and of the Occident."}, {"page_pdf": 91, "page_imprimee": "272", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.91", "texte": "\" L'Objet is the junction of two related trends. We assist at the birth of\na great constructive epoch. It goes without saying that reaction and bourgeois\nobstinacy are still powerful in Europe as well as in Russia, unseated from its\nold foundations. But all the efforts of old believers cannot retard the construc-\ntion of n«ew forms of life and of matter. The days of destruction, of sieges and\ntrenches are over.\n\"It is time to build on the cleared-off soil. That which is dead will disap-\npear of itself, but the empty ground has no need of programs or of schools,\nbut of work.\n\" L'Ob jet does not deny the past in the past. —In invites modern work for\nmodern times. That is why the vestiges of the day before yesterday, such as\nimpressionism, symbolism, etc, are hostile to it. We consider the triumph of\nconstructive methods as the essential trait of our time. We observe it as well\nin the new economics, as in the development of industry and psychology of\nthe Moderns in art.\n\" L'Objet stands for constructive art which does not embellish life, but which\norganizes it. We have called our review L'Objet because art exists for the crea-\ntion of new objects. It is that which explains the attraction which realism,\nweight, volume, the earth have for us.\n\" But it must not be concluded that the word L'Objet means for us objects\nof current usage. Naturally in the case of utilitarian objects fabricated in fac-\ntories, in the case of the areoplane, or the automobile we see the art of form.\nBut we do not wish to limit the production of artists to utilitarian objects.\n\" L'Objet considers a poem, a plastic form, a play as indispensable objects.\nL'Objet will observe with profound attention the reciprocal relations between\nmodern art and all the various manifestations of reality : science, politics, techni-\nque, customs, etc.\n\" In suffocating atmosphere, in exhausted Russia, in somnolent Europe\none cry rises.\n\" live — stop making declarations and contradictions — make objects\n\nOTHER BOOKS RECEIVED\nRahab. By Frank (Boni and Iyiveright, New York).\nThe Foundations of Aesthetics. By C. K. Ogden, I. A. Richards, and\nJ. Wood (G. Allen and Unwin, Iyondon, js. 6d. net).\nLa Danse de Qiva. By Ananda Coomaraswamy (F. Rieder et Cie., Paris).\n\nErnesto Fratonj, Gerente responsabile.\nPrinted in Italy by « I/Uuiverselle * Imprimerie Polyglotte — Roma."}, {"page_pdf": 92, "page_imprimee": "[273]", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.92", "texte": "Pa rfu m PA RI S „\n6 U/ie new COTYcreationll\n( fzscinatioiz of £2^CLViS—/Ae\nvivid brilliant personality of tire,\ncity courage—it brea tk es\nits indescriba bl& allure* iri the,\neoccjuisite- perfume, PAR.I S „\nike- veritable spirit esse-Tzce, of\n, the. citi,\ny\nc^J\n\"PARIS.\npSSENCE\nTOILET WATER\nPACE POWDER\nCOMPACT\nSACHET\nfleu? C 714- fffth \"venue\nOTtonireal 14- Phillips Square"}, {"page_pdf": 93, "page_imprimee": "[274]", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.93", "texte": "./Pearl\nno\nj6O fx\nvenue\n(UVeiucljorh\n=-m\nr=i\nr™\n■ •.,\nilj! -\nris\njg WItr\" CenturyJei\nWs- Casket—'beionqL\n|112 lotherDuchesse\n==;\": cU?<Y(? Tldoiric^-\n112\neioe\nc ru\niffiii\nWmWIB\nII\n%S,"}, {"page_pdf": 94, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaap192206-01.1.94", "texte": "The largest selling quality\npencil in the world.\nAS soft as you\nwish; as hard as\nyou please, but al-\nways smoother than\nyou had dreamed.\nAny VENUS Pen-\ncil you select glides\nover the paper with\na restful freedom free\nfrom friction.\n17 Black Degrees\n3 Copying\nFor bold heavy lines\n68-58-48-3B\nFor writing, sketching\n28-B-HB-F-H\nFor clean fine lines\n2H-3H-4H-SH-6H\nFor delicate, thin lines\n7H-BH-9H\nPlain Ends,\nper doz. $ 1.00\nRubber Ends,\nper doz. $ 1.20\nAt Stationers and Stores\nthroughout the World.\nAmerican\nLead Pencil Co\n220 Fifth Avenue\nNew York\nand London, Eng.\n\ncarv nvcre\njf\\ words express Row\n41 you. jeef ?~-\n\\ AjUr yow»Ve done vour feest\n—-tear it u.p and\nWitf%,^(oWersf\nSHE is, wric Of -phone us,\nand we'll arrange -far >Vnmg<3i?rlg delivery\nin zry city rn Und t-thanks i- Oar\n3,000 6?»hd£4 r^rusery{»iiv^# .. # ,\n75iE «f'Jkw%rk\" ?^'\n-785 PFm 724 -\n' t/^ew^or^\nODOOCDCDCDCDCDOtSIDDnDtSICDDDCDCDDDCDGDCDGDGDCOISIODCDCD\nCD CO\nCD CD\nCD (XI\n| Daniel Gallery |\nCO CD\nCO PAINTINGS BY MODERN CO\nCO CD\nCO CD\nAmerican and French Artists\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCO\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCO\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\ncd\nCD\nCD\nCD\nCD\n2 WEST 47™ STREET H\nCD\n§ NEW YORK CITY = {3}\nCD CD\nCD CD\nCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCD"}]}