{"numero_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_sha256": "c156da0f80edea4ff6b68aff43ccb7231b60558a6a18a28a67ec270d0e31385c", "source_tei": "https://github.com/Princeton-CDH/bluemountain-transcriptions/blob/main/periodicals/bmtnaau/issues/1925/10_01/bmtnaau_1925-10_01.tei.xml", "source_mets": "https://github.com/pulibrary/BlueMountain/blob/main/metadata/periodicals/bmtnaau/issues/1925/10_01/bmtnaau_1925-10_01.mets.xml", "url_numero": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01", "articles": [{"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c001", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c001", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "n. p.", "page_fin": "n. p.", "image_debut": 2, "image_fin": 2, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.1", "titre_corps": "LA TOPOGRAFIA DI ROMA", "titre_sommaire": "LA TOPOGRAFIA DI ROMA", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 2, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.2", "debut_caractere": 18, "fin_caractere_exclue": 211, "texte": "LA TOPOGRAF 1A D1 ROMA.\nDouble Plate of Nolli's Plan of Roma, independent of the other plates. Showing the whole Plan on a smaller scale, Piranesi, the Elder, has worked on this Plate.\nPlate 1."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c002", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c002", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "1", "page_fin": "4", "image_debut": 3, "image_fin": 6, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.2", "titre_corps": "FOREWORD", "titre_sommaire": "FOREWORD", "signature_source": "J. S", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 3, "page_imprimee": "1", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.3", "debut_caractere": 5, "fin_caractere_exclue": 956, "texte": "FOREWORD\n\nIN Nolli's Plan of Roma, which is here offered for the\nfirst time in a handy form and at a popular price, we\nhave a leaf of genuine History, for it is all fact.\nBooks about the Roma of the 18th century may con-\ntain as much fancy as fact, and that in time renders them\nof little use to the historian. We talk of the Roman streets,\nof the Palaces, Theatres, Churches and other monuments;\nwe write of the Piazza Navona or the Palazzo Rospigliosi,\nand though all these may be known by hearsay to us they\nstill remain vague, ....vague as to position, form, size, and\nin their relation to their surroundings.\nWe may have seen these places, but. perhaps forgotten\none of them, and, certainly, quite forgotten where they are\nplaced, how surrounded, or how one reaches them from\nthe Porta del Popolo or from the Porta di S. Giovanni\nLaterano.\nAsk yourself to define the track leading from Porta\ndel Popolo to the Piazza Navona without looking at any"}, {"page_pdf": 4, "page_imprimee": "2", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.4", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1537, "texte": "plan. It is only a matter of pulling down a few street\n....but can you do it?\nTo save you the trouble here is Nolli. He can stanc\non your desk in his present form: in 1748 he was far to<\nbig a book to be handy: and even if you can get a cop)\nnow it is too large to serve you as reference book, for it i:\na folio of thirty six pages, and measures one foot sever\ninches by one foot two inches.\n4 4 The Mask \" having seen that, besides this plan oi\nRoma being one of the very best, it was used frequently bj\nthe most active students of the Theatre, thought that, by\nreducing it to a practical size it would be doing some ser-\nvice. So now you can have your Mollis Plan of Roma\nclose at hand to refer to when rereading the many books\nwhich deal with Roma, no matter what the subject. Not\nonly theatrical students but scholars of all kinds will find\nit useful.\nThe Plan illustrates many hundreds of books, but it\nalso corrects, and with authority, a number of them, sup-\nplementing others. Errors have sometimes crept into these\nDooks because the chief guide, ie Roma itself, was not\nproperly followed.\nNolli shows us eight Theatres, most of them very\nclearly defined. Teatro Alibert, 296:\nTeatro Argentina, 771:\nTeatro Capranica, 332:\nTeatro de' Granari, 618:\nTeatro della Pace, 611:\nTeatro della Pallaccorda, 444:\nTeatro di Tordinona, 536:\nTeatro della Valle, 795.\nBut we must not forget that this short list of eight thea-\ntres represents none but the 44 public playhouses \": and thai\nin many a palace was a magnificent Teatro privato oi\n»"}, {"page_pdf": 5, "page_imprimee": "3", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.5", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1857, "texte": "a Teatrino. And, lest we develope any wrong notion about\nRoma and its manner of doing things of this kind in the\nseventeenth and eighteenth Centuries, let us state what a\nprivate Theatre was not in those days.\nMerely because it was private, it was not anything\nwhich today we call \"amateurish but inasmuch as it was\nan \" amatore delle arti\", a lover of the arts, who devoted a\nlarge portion of his wealth and time to the care of his\nTeatro, so was the work amateurish, but only in this sense.\nDevoting time and money to his Teatro did not as\na rule mean that he interfered with the work, the con-\nstruction of the place, the production or composition of plays,\n>pera or ballet. Counts Pepoli and Albergatti, two of the\noremost amatori d'arte of Italy, did assuredly write plays,\ntnd perform in them; but as a rule the great people of\nloma made and kept their private theatres more for the\nentertainment of their guests and to avoid the inconvenien-\n:es of the public playhouses with their crush, draughts,\nloise and suffocation.\nAmongst those who had Private Theatres in Roma\nvere the Queen of Poland, Maria Casimira, who in 1709\nived in Pal azzo de Torres alia Trinita del Monte: Olimpia\n\\ldobrandini, the famous Principessa di Rossano; the\nSpanish Ambassador whose private theatre in the Spanish\n3alace was built in 1688: the Barberini family, whose\nheatre it is said seated 3000 people and was opened in\n1634. The Prince Galicano had a private Theatre at\nvhich Evelyn in 1645 witnessed \" a magnificent opera \".\nThen there was the teatro of Palazzo Rospigliosi; those of\n3alazzo Corsini; of Palazzo Colonna in Borgo, (the Co-\nonna family had it seems two private theatres, one of these\nmown as \" il grand teatro del Contestabile Colonna \"); of\nthe Palazzo Panfili in the Corso; and of the Collegio Ro-\nmano. The most fashionable theatre of 1639 was a pri-"}, {"page_pdf": 6, "page_imprimee": "4", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.6", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 534, "texte": "vate Theatre built by Bernini in the Fonderia del Yati-\ncano. Lastly there was the teatrino built for Cardinal Pietro\nOttoboni by Juvarra in about 1 700, a building of three\ntiers and most beautifully designed interior. We have seen\nthe almost unknown original designs. In 1678 during the\ncarneval there were 130 comedies given in the private\ntheatres of Roma.\nBut most of our readers probably know all about\nthese places and what was performed there, and the Plan\nis nnlv to serve as a means of locating their exact positions.\n\nJ. S."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c004", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c004", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "5", "page_fin": "34", "image_debut": 7, "image_fin": 36, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.3", "titre_corps": "A NEW PLAN OF ROMA : by GIOVAN BATTISTA NOLLI.(1) PUBLISHED IN THE YEAR MDCCXLVIII", "titre_sommaire": "A NEW PLAN OF ROMA : by GIOVAN BATTISTA NOLLI.(1) PUBLISHED IN THE YEAR MDCCXLVIII", "signature_source": "GIOVAN BATTISTA NOLLI", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 7, "page_imprimee": "5", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.7", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2677, "texte": "A NEW PLAN OF ROMA\nBY GIOVAN BATTISTA NOLLI.(1)\nPUBLISHED IN THE YEAR MDCCXLVIII.\n(i)\nFOREWORD BY THE DESIGNER.\nALTHOUGH the leaves of the large Plan\nof Roma ought to be all united\ntogether, so as to have them all extended\nbefore the eye, as are usually all Geo-\ngraphical Maps, yet, if it should please\nanyone to have them bound, in book form,\nit is to be noted that, to be able to make\nuse of its indexes, desiring to find those\nBuildings or Places which are in the same\nPlan, it is necessary first to find in the\nalphabetical Index the name of that Buil-\nding or Place which one is seeking, and\nio see what is the number by which it\nts indicated on the sheets ; then the same\nnumber is found in the other numerical\nIndex, and in this wise one will know in\nwhich Rione it is described : and, seeing\nin that same Rione the number already\nfound, one will see the Place or Building\ndesired. At the top of each sheet are\nrepeated the Rione,and, some being de-\nscribed in a single sheet, others in several\nsh eets, there is indicated, beside the name\nof each one, those sheets in which some\npart of this same Rione is included, and\nin one of which there will be found the\nnumber of the Building, or Place, which\none seeks.\nRIONI OR DIVISIONS OF THE CITY.\nRione I. Monti Sheet 14. 15. 16. Rione VIII. S. Eustacio 19.\n20.21.22.27. « IX. Pigna 19.\n28.\n\" II. Trevi 20.21.26.27. X. Campitelli 6.9.14.15.19.\n\" III. Colonna 19. 20. 25. 26. \" Xl- S- AnSel° l9'\n27. \" XII. Ripa 5.6,8.12.13.\n\" IV. Campo Marzo 19. 25. 26. 19.\n\" V. Ponte 18.19.24.25. \" XIII. Trastevere 12. 13. 18. 19.\n\" VI. Parione 18. 19. 24.\n\" VII. Regola 18.19. 11 XIV. Borgo 23.24.\n\n(1} IAMB A TTISTA, or Giovan Battista Nolli was born at\nVJT Como, in Italy, about thebeginning of the eighteenth\ncentury. An architect by profession, he built the church of\nS. Dorotea in Roma, and in 1748 made a plan of that city,\nwhich was issued under the title of \" Nuova Pianta di Roma\nIt is a plan of the modern city with indications of the ancient\nruins, and was considered the finest which had been executed\nup to that time. Some years later, about 1755, he made another\nplan of ancient Roma.\nHe died in 1780, ten years after his son Carlo, who, a\npainter and engraver, predeceased him, in Naples where he\nhad gone to work for the King of Naples, in 1770.\n(2) r I AHERE are two Indexes in the original edition. We\n1 have not included the Alphabetical Index, thinking that\none Index would be enough for the moment. We have used\nthe two, and find the one i?icluded here to be the more useful\nof the two.\n*\nBUT we will give the Alphabetical Index in the next\nnumber of \" The Mask and those who wish can\nhine the whole work together."}, {"page_pdf": 8, "page_imprimee": "6", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.8", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 658, "texte": "INDEX OFNUMBERS ON THE PLAN.\nRIONE I. - MONTI.\n1. Chiesa di S. Stefano Rotondo T.C. 43\n2. Strada della Ferratella\n3. Ruine Antiche 44\n4. Abitazione de' PP. Penitenzieri di\nS. Gio. Laterano\n5. Cliiesa patriarc. e\" Paroc. di hS. Gio.\nLaterano\n6. Palaz Pontifieio ora Conservatorio di\nZitelle\n7. Cbiesa di S. Maria in Fonte\n8. Chiesa delle SS. Rufina, e Seconda\n9. Chiesa di S. Gio. in Fonte\n10. Obelisco gi& del Circo Massimo\n11. Sped, di S. Gio. per gli Uomini\n12. Cliiesa di S. Andrea unita al d. Sped.\n13. Sped, di S. Gio. per le Donne\n14. Obelisco Lodovisio giacente\n15. Sancta, Sanctorum e Scala santa\n16. Orat e Confrat del Sagramento in\nS. Gio. Laterano"}, {"page_pdf": 9, "page_imprimee": "7", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.9", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 685, "texte": "17' 'lieid(leLLxivU'0 linovato da N* S'\nBenedetto XIV\n• £a*P. f. Margarita\n19. Cap. di S. M. de Cisterciensi\n<20. Anfiteatro Castrense\n2L. Chiesa di S. Croce in Gernsalem T.C.\no0 t °? Cisterci Lombardi\n-2. lenipio di Venere, e Cupidine\n23. Strada Felice\n24. Terme di S. Elena\n25. Acquedotto di Claudio Imp.\n26. Tempio di Minerva Medina\n27. Chiesa di S. Bibiana\n28. Chiesa di S. Matteo in Merculana T.C.\ne conv. di Agostiniani Jrland.\n29. Chiesa di SS. Pietro? e Marcellino\nT. C. e Monast. de Maroniti di S. An-\ntnnin AW(,\n,,n /u,;!\" aJ pi t rT. n n\nChiesa di S. Clemente I. C. e Conven.\n\"e' Ibernesi\n31- Chiesa di S. Maria di Loreto, e Ospi-\nzio de Convalescenti\n32. Terme di Tito Imp."}, {"page_pdf": 10, "page_imprimee": "8", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.10", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 755, "texte": "33. Conserve d'acqua per d. Terme dette\nle sette sale\n34. Strada delle sette sale\n35. Palaz, e Villa Gaetani\n36. Chiesa di S. Giuliano, e Ospiz. dei\nCarmelit. della Provin. Romana\n37. R. A. d' volgarmente, i Trofei di\nMario\n38. Chiesa di S. Eusebio I. C. e Monast\nde' Celestini\n39. Ruin© credute della Villa di Meceuate\n40. Chiesa de' SS. Vito e Modesto D.C. e\nMonasterio de Cistercien. della Pro-\nvincia Romana\n41. Arco di Gallieno Imp.\n42. Chiesac'della Conceze e conservatorio\ndetto delle Viperesclie\n43. Memoria della Reconciliazione di En-\nrico IV\n44. Argine di Tarquinio\n45. Chiesa di S. Antonio Abate, e casa\nde' Canonici Reg. di d. Santo di Vien-\nna in Erancia\n46. Sped, di S. Antonio Abate\n47. Abitazione de' PP. Penitenzieri d.\nS. Maria Maggiore"}, {"page_pdf": 11, "page_imprimee": "9", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.11", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 716, "texte": "48. Colonna gia del Tempio della Pace\n49. Chiesa patriarc. di S. Mi Maggiore\n50. Obelisco gia del Mausol d'Ang.\n51. Palazzo Ciarnpini.\n52. Strada Paolina\n53. Palazzo Ravenna\n54. Strada dell' Olmo\n55. Palazzo Pocavena\n56. C. P. di S. Prassede T. 0. e Monast.\nde Vallombrosani\n57. Strada della Coroncina\n58. C. P. di S. Martino a' Monti T. C. e\nconv. de' Carroelitani con mine cre-\ndute delle Terme di Tito\n59. Chiesa di S. Lucia in selee e Monast.\ndi Agostiniane con R. A. e Torre\n60. Chiesa di S. M. della Purificazione e\nMonast di Monaclie di S. Chiara\ncon It. A,\n61. Cap. gia S. M. in Monasterio\n62. Monast. di Oblate di S. Francesco di\nPaola\n63. Yicolo di Monti Pollaeco\n64. Cbiesa di S. Pietro in Vincoli T. C. e"}, {"page_pdf": 12, "page_imprimee": "10", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.12", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 629, "texte": "Monasterio di Canonici Reg. di S. Sal*\nvatore\n65. C. P. di S. Franc, di Paola e conv.\nde' Minimi di Calabria con Tore\n66. Orat. e confr. di d. Santo\n67. Chiesa della concezion e Monast. di\ncappuccine dette Farnesiane\n68. Vicolo dell'Agnello d° Scelerato\n69. Vicolo del Cardello\n70. Chiesa di SS. Andrea Apost. e Ber-\nnardino de' Rigattieri\n71. Tempio creduto d' Isside e Serapide\n72 Chiesa di S. Francesca Romana e\nMonasterio d' Olivetani\n73. Arco di Tito Imp.\n74. Tempio della Pace\n75. Conservatorio delle Zitelle Mendicanti\ndel P. caravita\n76. Chiesa di S. Pantaleone a'Monti e\nconvitto di Preti Secolari\n77. Yicolo del Pozzolo"}, {"page_pdf": 13, "page_imprimee": "11", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.13", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 604, "texte": "78. Yicolo de'Pozzi\n79. Strada Alessandrina\n80. Ohiesa de SS. Cosmo, e Damiano D.C.\ne con. de' PP. del 3 ordine di S. Franc0\n81. Chiesa di S. Lorenzo in Miranda de'gli\nspeziali gi& Tempio d'Antoniuo, e\nFaustina\n82. Strada della salara vecchia\n83. Yicolo del Lauro\n84. Strada del Sole\n85. Avanzi del Foro Palladio, o di Xerva\n86. Torre di Conti\n87. Piazza delle Carrette\n88. Yicolo delle Pernicone\n89. C. P. de SS. Quirico, e G-iulitta T. C.\n©Ospizio de' Domenicani di S. Marco\ndi Firenze\n90. Orat. e Confr. del Sagramento in detta\nohiesa\n91. Strada di Torre de' eonti\n92. Chiesa di S. Agata de' Tessitori"}, {"page_pdf": 14, "page_imprimee": "12", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.14", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 769, "texte": "93. Strada della Croce Bianca\n94. Chiesa di S. Adriauo D. C. e conv.\nde' PP. della Mercede della prov.\nRoman a\n95. Orat. di S. M. del Riscatto degli\nAcqnavitari e Tabaccari\n96. Arco di Settimio Severo\n97. Chiesa de SS. Martina e Luca del-\nl'accademia de'Pittori\n98. Strada Bonella\n99. Strada del Priorato\n100. Palazzo Ghislieri\n101. Strada Creriiona, e Mannorella\n102. Strada delle Chiavi d'oro\n103. Chiesa di S. Urbano, e Monastero delle\nMonache Cappuccine\n104. Vicolo di Carbonari\n105. Palazzino Conti\n106. C. P. di S. Lorenzo a' Monti\n107. Strada di Testa Spaccata\n108. Strada di Marforio\n109. Palazzino Carandini\n110. Palazzino Mantica con sepolcro di\nCajo Pnblicio\n111. Luogo della Ripresa de' Barbari\n112. Piazza di' Marcel de' Corvi\n113. Piazza e colonna Trajana"}, {"page_pdf": 15, "page_imprimee": "13", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.15", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 728, "texte": "114. Chiesa delio Spirito Santo, e Mona-\nstero di Canonicliesse Lateranensi\n115. Chiesa di S. Enfemia, e Conserva-\nt.orio di Zitelle\n116. Vicolo de' Taroli\n117. Palazzi Cevra\n118. Salita di Monte Magnanapoli\n119. Ruine de' Bagni di Paolo\n120. Ospizio per le vedove\n121. C. P. di S- Min. Oampo Carleo\n122. Strada di Campo Carleo\n123. Chiesa dell' Annunziatn, e Monast.\ndi Donienicane nel Foro di ISTerva\n124. Arco di Pontani\n125. Yicolo degli Ibernesi\n120. Collegio degli Ibernesi\n127. Piazza del Grillo\n128. Palazzo del Grillo con Torre\n129. Salita del Grillo\n130. Chiesa di S. Caterina di Siena, e\nMonastero di Donienicane con Torre\n131. Chiesa di SS. Domenico, e Sisto, e\nMonastero di Domenieane della Pro-\nvincia di Lombardia"}, {"page_pdf": 16, "page_imprimee": "14", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.16", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 560, "texte": "132. Cbiesa di S. Bernardino, e Monast.\ndi Monacbe del 3 ordine di S. Franc0\n133. Collegio Faccioli\n134. Strada Bacciua\n135. C. P. di S. Salvatore, e Casa de' Ca-\ntecuraeni\n136. Orat. di S. Gio. Battista de' Neofiti\ne conservat. delle Neofiti\n137. Cliiesa di S. Maria de Monti e Col-\nlegio de Neofiti in cura de Pij Operari\n138. Orat. e Confr. di S M della Neve\n139. Strada Leonina\n140. Cliiesa di S. M. del Pasrolo, e Ospiz.\nde Monaci Basiliani Kuteni\n141. Strada de Serpen ti\n142. Strada delle Carrette\n143 Abitaze Stefanoni con Torre\n144. Vicolo del Sambuco"}, {"page_pdf": 17, "page_imprimee": "15", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.17", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 523, "texte": "145. Piazza de' Zingari\n146. Strada Clementina\n147. Yicolo di Cimarra\n148. Palazzo Passarini\n149. Palazzo Cimarra\n150. Yicolo di Ciancaleone\n151. Strada Paradisi\n152. Strada TTrbana\n153. Cliiesa di S. Lorenzo in Fonte e\nOspiz. TTrbano de' Coitegiani\n154. Piazza, e Strada della Suburra\n155. Ospiz. de Benfratelli Spagnnoli\n156. Strada Graziosa\n157. Cliiesa delPAnnunziata e Monast. di\nAgostiniane de le Turchine\n158. Monnst. delle Filippine\n159 Abitazione Cantarelli con Torre\n160. Salita di Sforza\n161. Vicolo di Buinaglia"}, {"page_pdf": 18, "page_imprimee": "16", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.18", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 611, "texte": "162. Chiesa del Bambino Gesu e convitto\ndi oblate Agostiniani\n163. Vicolo della Caprareccia\n164. Chiesa di S. Lorenzo in Pane, e\nPerna T. C. e Monast. di Monache\ndi S. Chiara con It. A.\n165. Torre nella Yigua di Monache\n166. Strada del Boscbetto\n167. Palazzino Corasoli\n168. Chiesa di S. Agata in Snburra D. C. e\nMonast. de'Monaci di Monte Yergine\n169. Palazzo Panfiii\n170. Palazzino Reali\n171. Vicolo de' Mazzarini\n172. Palazzo Pianetti\n173. Palazzo Rospigliosi\n174. Palazzo della Consulta\n175. Chiesa di S- M. Maddal. a Monte\nCavallo e Monast. di Domenicane\n176. Chiesa del Sagramento, e Monast.\ndi Cappuccine"}, {"page_pdf": 19, "page_imprimee": "17", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.19", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 670, "texte": "177. Chiesa di S. Andrea, e Eoviziato\nde Gesuiti\n178. Chiesa di S. Vitale unita a detto\nNoviziato\n179. Chiesa di S. Anna e S. Gioachino,\ne Ospiz. de' Carmelitani Scalzi\n180 Chiesa di S. Carlo, e Ospiz. de' Tri-\nnitari Scalzi Spagnuoli\n181. Quattro Eontane\n182. Chiesa di S. Dionisio, e conv. de\nTrinitari Scalzi Francesi\n183. Strada di S. Vitale\n184. Palazzino dell' Emo Albani S. Cleme\n185. Chiesa di S. Paolo p. Eremita e Ospiz\ndi Eremiti TJngari di d° Santo\n186. Chiesa di S. M. della Sanity, ©\nS. Efrem, e Ospiz. per Siriaci\n187. Palazzino dell' Emo Alessandro Al-\nbani\n188. Cliiesa di S. Pudenziana T. C. e\nMonast. de Cistercien. Riforni; di\nS. Bernardino con R. A."}, {"page_pdf": 20, "page_imprimee": "18", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.20", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 544, "texte": "189. Chiesa di S. Norberto. e Collegio de\nMonaci Preraostrateusi\n190. Palazzo Albani\n191. Chiesa di S. Teresa, e Monast. di\nCarmelitane Scalze\n192. Cbiesa dell' Incarnazione e Monast,\n> dell© Carmelit di S. M. Maddalena\nde' Pazzi de le Barberine\n193. Cbiesa di S. Caionnita al d° Monnst.\n194. Ospiz. di Ermiti Camaldolesi To-\nscani\n195. Chiesa di S. Bernardo T. C , e Mo-\nnast. di Cistercien Pi form. cli d.\nSanto\n19G. Orat. di S. Caterina unita alia Sudetla\n197. Granari Pubblici\n198. Piazza di Termine\n199. Palaz, © Villa Negroni gia Montaltq"}, {"page_pdf": 21, "page_imprimee": "19", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.21", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 342, "texte": "200. Conserve <1 Vienna delle Tonne Dio-\ncleziane \"\n201. Luogo dove si seppelliscono i x>r°te-\nstanti\n202. Castro Pretorio\n203. Chiesa di S. M. degli Angeli T. C, e\nMonast. de' Certosini nolle Terme\nDioeleziane\n204. Granari pubblici\n205. Fontana dell'acqua Felice\nRIONE II, - TREYI.\n206. C. P. di Susanna T. C. e Mouastero\ndi Monaehe Cisterci"}, {"page_pdf": 22, "page_imprimee": "20", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.22", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 482, "texte": "207. Cliiesa di S. Maria del la Vittoria e\nconv : de' Carmelit Scalzi Italiani\n208. Tempio detto <1 i Venere\n209. Avanzi del Circo do di Flora\n210. Yicolo del Falcone\n211. Chiesadi S. Nicolb di Tolentino e coil-\nvento di Agostiniani Scalze con Torre\n212. Vicolo della Colonna\n213. Cliiesa di S. Basilio, e Monastero\ndi Basiliani Italo-Greci\n214. Piazza Barberina gia Sforza e Gr;-\nman a\n215. Palazzo Barberini con Guglia gia-\ncente nel Cortile\n216. Palazzo Barberini per la famiglia"}, {"page_pdf": 23, "page_imprimee": "21", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.23", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 340, "texte": "217. Palazzino Galloppi\n218. Chiesa di S. Andrea e Collegio Scoz-\nzese\n219. Palazzo Grimani\n220. Strada Rasella\n221. Cliiesa di S. Maria della Neve e\nOspiz. de Cistercien. Risorm. Fuliensi\n222. Yicolo degli Avignonesi\n223. Yicolo della Palma\n224. CP di S. Nicolo in Arcione, e\nOspiz. de' Servi di Maria\n225. Orat, del bmo Crocif. agonizante"}, {"page_pdf": 24, "page_imprimee": "22", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.24", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 487, "texte": "della Confr. del Sagramt0 di detta\nChiesa\n226. Palazzo dell' Emo Gentili\n227. Vicolo de Gallinaccio\n228. Chiesa di S. Gio. e Colleg de' Ma-\nroniti\n229. Strada de Maroniti\n230. Palazzo del Emo Alberoni\n231. Cliiesa e Confr. de SS. Angeli Cu-\nstodi\n232. Palazzo Panfili\n233. Acquedotto delPacqna Vergine\n234. Palazzo Bufalo\n235. Strada della Cliiavica del Bufalo\n236. Cliiesa di S. Claudio de Borgoguoni\n237. Yicolo del Merangolo\n238. C. P. di S. M. in Via T. C. e conv,\nde' Servi di Maria"}, {"page_pdf": 25, "page_imprimee": "23", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.25", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 542, "texte": "239. Orat. e Confr. del Sagr. ind. Chiesa\n240. Piazza di Poli\n241. Palazzo Conti\n242. 0. P. di S. M. in Trivio, e casa de\nMinistri degli Infermi\n243. Fontana di Trevi e sua Piazza\n244 Palazzo Cavalieri\n245. S trad a Kuova\n246. Piazza © Vicolo di Scanderbecli\n247. C. P. de' SS. Vincenzo ed Anastasio,\ne Casa de' Chierici Minori\n248. Yicolo del Babuccio\n249. Dataria Apostolica, e Eesidenza del\nDatario\n250. Palazzo Pontificio nel Quirinale\n251. Orat. del Beato Nicold de' Rnpe\nnella Guardia de' Svizzeri\n252. Piazza di Monte Cavallo con Font."}, {"page_pdf": 26, "page_imprimee": "24", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.26", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 685, "texte": "253. Quartieri per la Guardia Reale\n254. Scuderia Pontificia\n255. Abitazione per la Famiglia Pontif.\n256. Chiesa di S. Croce, e Bonaventura\nde' Lncchesi con Spedale\n257. Palazzo Testa Piccolomini\n258. Palazzo e Giardino del Contestable\nColonna con R. A.\n259. Chiesa di S. Silvestro, e Noviziato\nde' Teatini\n360. Palazzo Vidman, e Ospizio de' Ve-\nscovi Yeneti\n201. Palazzo Florenzi\n262. Palazzo Molara\n263. Piazza delle 3 Cannelle, e Fontana\n264. Palazzino Stella\n265. Abitazione della Famiglia di Casa\n( olonna con Torre\n266. Palazzo Grassi\n267. S. M. del Carmine Orat della Confr.\naggregata alia Cliiesa di S. Marti no\na' Monti\n268. Vicolo de' Colonnesi con Arco\n269. Palazzo Cigolini"}, {"page_pdf": 27, "page_imprimee": "25", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.27", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 590, "texte": "270. Palazzo Scarlatti\n271. Palazzo Papi\n272. Chiesa e confr. del Nome di Maria\n278. Palazzo Bonelli\n274. Cliiesa di'S. M. di Loreto dell' Uni-\nversity de' Fornari Italiani\n275. Spedale dell' universita snd.a\n276. Palazzo Parracciani\n277. Palazzo Bolognetti\n278. Cliiesa di S, Romnaldo, e Ospizio\nde' Camaldolesi\n279. Palazzo Altemps Isimbardi S, Casa\ndi Lore to\n280. Vicolo del Piombo\n281. Palazzo e Giardino Colonna\n282. Strada della Pilotta con due Ar-\nchi\n283. C. P. de' S.S. XII Apostoli T. C. e\nconv. de'Minimi Conventuali\n284. Palazzo Odescalco\n285. Palazzo dell'Accademia di Francia"}, {"page_pdf": 28, "page_imprimee": "26", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.28", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 736, "texte": "286. C. P. di S. Marcello T. C, e Con-\nvento de' Serviti\n287. Orat. © Conf. del Crocif. in d. Chiesa\n28S. Palazzo Millini\n289. Palazzo Muti Papazzurri\n290. Palazzino della Comp. de'SS. XII\nApostoli\n291. Strada del Umilta\n292. Palazzo Mnti Papazzurri\n393. Piazza della I'ilotta\n294. Palazzo Ciogni\n295. Palazzo Grimaldi\n296. Chiesa di S. M. dell' Uroilta, © Mo-\nnastero di Domenicane\n297. Palazzo Maccarani\n298 Strada dell© Vergini\n299. Chiesa di S. M. dell© Vergini, e Mo-\nnastero di Agostinian©\n300. Palazzo Colonna di Carbognano\n301. Strada dell© Mnratte\n302. Piazza di Sciarra, © Arco di Carbo-\ngnano\nElOKE III. - COLONEA.\n303. Palazzo dell' Ereditk Lanci\n304. Ospiz. di S. Croc© de' Monaci Ci-\nstercien di Lombardia\n305. Piazza Rosa"}, {"page_pdf": 29, "page_imprimee": "27", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.29", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 697, "texte": "306. Palazzo Spada\n307. Yicolo del Pozzo\n308. Yicolo di Cacciabove\n309. Palazzo Ghigi\nColonna di Marco Aurelio, e Piazza\ndetta Colonna\n311. Palazzo dell' Ospizio Apostolico Abi-\ntazione di Monsig Yicegevente\n312. Palazzo della Casa degii Or fan i\n313. Palazzo del Cinque\n314. Palazzo delle Monaclie Agostiniane\ndella Terra di Calvi\n315. Piazza di Pietra\n316. Chiesa de SS* Bartolomeo e Alessan-\ndro e Sped, de Bergamaschi, e Colleg.\nCerasoli\n317. Palazzo Niccoliui\n318. Palazzo Guelfi Camaiani Montauti e\nKovarelli\n319. Yicolo dell'Archetto\n320. Palazzo Montecatini\n321. Palazzo di S. Giac. degli Incurabili\n322. Dogana di Terra con Colonue An-\ntiche\n323. Cliiesa di S. Mauto\n324. Seminario Komano"}, {"page_pdf": 30, "page_imprimee": "28", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.30", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 791, "texte": "ooc Palazzo Serlupi\n326. Vicolo de* Pastini\n327. Vicolo della Spada d'Orlando\n328 Palazzo della Confr. del Rosario con\ndue Colonne Antiche nel Cortile\n329. Piazza Capranica\n330 CP di S. M. in Aquiro D. C. e Col-\n' legio'Salviati e casa degli Orfani\n331. TEATRO CAPRANICA\n332. Teatro Cap-ranica\n333. Collegio Capranica\n334. Chiesa di S. M. Maddalena, e Casa\nde' Ministri degli Infermi\n335. Vicolo delle Colonuelle\n336. Palazzo delle Monac. di Campo Marzo\n337. Strada di Monte Citorio\n338. Piazza di Monte Citorio, e Piedestallo\ndella Colonna Antonina\n339. Palazzo dell'Ospiz. Apostolico d('\nl,a Curia Innocenziana\n340. Colonna Antonina giaoente\n341. Chieaa della Sma J riuitit, e Casa\nde Missionary\n342. Palazzo Mariscotti\n243. Palazzo Rondinini\n344. Palazzo Conti con Obehsco Solare\ngiacente"}, {"page_pdf": 31, "page_imprimee": "29", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.31", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 757, "texte": "345. Palazzo Paiorabara\n346. Palazzo Yerospi\n347. Palazzo Teodoli\n348. Palazzo Grhigi per la famiglia\n319. Palazzo Magnani\n350. C. P. di S. Lorenzo in Lucina T. C.\ne Casa di Chierici Minori\n351. Palazzo Ottoboni con Torre\n352. Palazzo Araadori Prelatura\n353. Sito dell'Arco di Marco Aurelio gi^t\nd° di Portogallo\n351. Strada del Gambaro\n355. Palazzo Raggi\n356. Chiesa diS. M. Maddalena e Monast.\ndi Agostiniane dette le Convertite\n357. Chiesa di S. Silvestco in Capite T* C.\ne Monast. di monache di S. Chiara\n358. Strada della Vite\n359. Strada Frattina\n360. Strada del Moretto\n361. Chiesa di S. Grio. e Ospiz de'P.P,\ndella Mercede Scalzi Spagnuoli\n362. Palazzi Bernini\n363. Palazzo Olgiati\n361. Chiesa de' SS. Re' Magi, e Collegio\nTJrbano di Propaganda Fide"}, {"page_pdf": 32, "page_imprimee": "30", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.32", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 7557, "texte": "365. C. P. di S. Andrea delle Fratte, e\nConvento de'Minimi\n366. S.S. Andrea Apost. e Franc, di Paola\norat della confr. del Sagramento in\nd. Chiesa\n367. Collegio Nazzareno\n368. Palazzi de'Angelis\n369. Piazza de' due Macelli\n370. Strada Paolina\n371. Yicolo de Zucchelli\n372. Cbiesa di S. M. dell'Idria detta di\nCostantinopoli de' Siciliani\n373. Chiesa di S. Giuseppe a' Capole\nCase e Monastero di Teresiane\n374. Chiesa de SS. Iddfonso, e Tomaso\ndi Villanova, e Ospiz. di AgGstiniani\nScalzi Spagnuoli\n375. Chiesa di S. Francesca Bomana e\nconvento di Trinitari Italiani\n376. Orat. dell'Assunta della Confr. del\nSagram. di S. Susanna\n377. Ospiz. di Benedettini Spagnuoli\n378. Palazzino Perucclii\n379. Strada della Purificazione\n380. Chiesa della Sma concezione, e\nconvento de' Cappuccini\n381. Palazzo Lucatelli\n382. Palazzo e Yilla Ludovisi\n383. Strada Salara\n384. Chiesa di S. Isidoro e Collegio de'\nMin Osservanti Irlandesi\n385. Palazzo Guarnieri\no BIONE IY. - CAMPO MABZO. o\n386. Palazzo Tomati\n387. Strada Gregoriana\n388. Piazza Mignanelli\n38th Palazzi Mignanelli\n390. Palazzo Zuccari, Nazari Comp. della\nNunziata\n391. Chiesa della Trinita de'Monte T. C.\ne Convento de' Minimi Francesi\n392. Palazzo, e Villa Medici\n393. Obolisco in detta Yilla\n394. Cap. di S. Gaetano in da Yilla\n395. Piazza di Spagna\n396. TEATBO DETTO D'ALIBEBT\n397. Strada Margntta\n398. Palazzo Boncompagni\n399. Fontana, e Strada del Babuino\n400. Vicolo del Borghetto\n401. Chiesa P. di S. M del Popolo T. C.\ne conv. di Agostiniani Lombardi\n402. I uogo dove si sepelliscono gP Impe-\nnitenti e Muro Tor to\n403. Piazza del Popolo con Fontana, e\nObelisco gi& del Circo Massimo\n404. Cbiesa di S. M. di Monte Santo, e\nconvento di Carmelitani Biformati\n405. Strada Laurina\n406. Strada Orsini\n407. Cbiesa di Gesu, e Maria, e Convento\nd'Agostiniani Scalzi\n408. Oratorio e Confr. di Gesu, Me Giu-\nseppe\n409. Chiesa di S. Atanasio de' Greci\n410. Arco, e Strada de' Greci\n411. Collegio Greco\n412. Cbiesa di S. Orsola, e Monastero di\nAgostiniane dette le Orsoline\n413. Strada Yittoria\n414. Strada de' Sediari\n415. Palazzo Gomez\n416. Strada della Croce\n417. Strada delle Carozze\n418. Palazzo della Beligione di Malta\n419. Palazzo della Porta\n420. Strada della Serena\n421. Palazzo della Trinita de' Pellegrini\n422. Strada Condotti\n423. Cbiesa della Trinita e ospizio de'\nTrinitari Castigliani\n424. Oratorio e Conf. del Sagramento in\nS. Lorenzo in Lncina\n425. Palazzo Avogadri\n426. Palazzo Nunez\n427. Palazzo Maruscelli\n428. Strada Porgognona\n429. Palazzo di Spagna\n430. Strada di Boccaleone\n431. Yicolo del Gambaro\n432. Palazzo Manfroni\n433. Strada del Corso\n434. Palazzo Buspoli\n435. Strada del Leoncino\n436. Piazza della Torretta\n437. Palazzo della S. Casa de' Loreto\n438. Piazza di Campo Marzo\n439. Palazzo Valdina Cremona\n440. Cbiesa di S. M. in Campo Marzo e\nMonast. di Benedettine, con 2 chiese\ninteriori di S. Maria, e di S. Grego-\nrio Nazzinzeno\n441. Strada di Campo Marzo\n442. Piazza di Firenze\n443. Yicolo di Ascanio\n444. TEATBODELLAPALLACCOBDA\n445. Palazzo Cardelli\n446. Palazzo'di Firenze\n447. C. P. di S. Nicolb de' Perfetti e\nospizio di Domenicani di S. Sabina\n448. Oratorio e Confr. del Sagramento e\nS. Catarina di Siena in da. Cbiesa\n449. Yicolo della Lupa\n450. Cbiesa di SS. Biagio, e Cecilia de'\nMaterassari\n451. Palazzo Borghese\n452. Piazza Borghese\n453. Palazzo Borghese per la Famiglia\n454. Vicolo del Merangolo\n455. Piazza di Monte d'Oro\n456. Ospizio de' Liegesi\n457. Palazzino Quarantotto\n458. Strada del Macello\n459. ChiesaColleg: di S. GirolamodeSchia-\nvoni T. C. con Spedale per Nazionali\n460. Strada del Grottino\n461. Cbiesa di S. Ambrogio, e S. Carlo\ndi Milanesi con Spedale\n462. Oratorio e Confr. de' Milanesi\n463. Strada di Schiavoni\n464. Piazza delle Carrette\n465. Piazza degli Otto Cantoni\n466. Strada, e vicolo delle Colonnelle\n467. Yicolo della Pergola\n468. Chiesa e Confr. di S. Bocco\n469. Oratorio sotto la detta Invocazione\n470. Spedale per gli Uomini\n471. Spedale per le donne partorienti\n472. Maus. di Augusto, e Palazzo Correa\n473. Strada de' Pontefici\n474. Yicolo della Frezza\n475. Palazzo Minucci\n476. Chiesa di S. Giacomo degl'Incurabili\n477. Spedale per le donne\n478. Spedale per gli Domini\n479. Chiesa di S. M. Porta Paradisi\n480. Sped, dismesso di S. Giacomo sud.\n481. Palazzo di S. Giacomo sudetto\n482. Yicolo del Yantaggio\n483. Palazzo Bondinini\n484 Chiesa di S. M. de' Miracoli de\nPP. del 3 ordine Biformati di S. Fran-\ncesco Francesi\n485. Yicolo dell'Inferno\n486. Piazza de' Miracoli\n487. Yicolo de' Miracoli\n488. Piazza dell' Oca\n489. Yicolo della Penna\n490. Yicolo delle Scalette\n491. Palazzo Cardelli gia Capponi\n492. Cbiesa di S. M. della providdenza, e\nconserv. di zitelle a Bipetta\n493. Dogana di Bipetta\n494. Strada e Porto di Bipetta\n495. Cbiesa di S. Gregorio dell'Universit&\nde' Muratori\n496. Oratorio di d°. Santo della da. Dni-\nversita\n497. Strada Leccosa\n498. Palazzo de' Aste de' Genova\n499. Collegio Clemeutino\n500. Torre del detto Collegio\n501. Piazza Nicosia\n502. Palazzo Negroni\n503. Palazzo Celesi ora Negroni\n504. C. P. di S. Ivo de' Britanni\n505. Yicolo della Campana\n506. Chiesa di S. Antonio di Padova de'\nPortoghesi con conv. di Preti © Spe.\n507. Vicolo del Leoncino\n508. C, P. © Colleg. di S. Lucia della Tinta\n509. Strada di Mont© Brianzo\no RIO N E V . - PONTE o\n510. Palazzo de* Romanis\n511. Palazzo Carafa Prelatura\n512. Palazzo della confr. del Confalone\ncon Torre\n513. Yicolo della Palombella\n514. Strada de' Gigli d' Oro\n515. Cliiesa di S. Apollinare e Collegio\nGermanico Ungarico\n516. Arco detto di S. Agostino\n517. Piazza Palomba\n518. Torre Sanguigna in Casa Conti\n519. Palazzo Altemps con cap. Insigne di\nS. Aniceto Papa e Martire\n520. Yicolo de' Soldati\n521. Palazzo Gottifredi\n522. C. P. di S. M. in Posterula e Mo-\nnastero di Celestini\n523. Arco detto di Parma\n524. Strada dell'Orso\n525. C. P. di Simon© Profeta\n526. Palazzo Cesi\n527. Strada della Maschera d'Oro\n528. Strada Gaetana\n529. Palazzo Sacripanti\n530. Piazza Fiammetta\n531. Palazzo Sampieri\n532. Cbiesa di S. Trifone\n533. Palazzo Lancellotti\n534. Yicolo de' Matriciani\n535. Chiesa di S. Salvatorein Lauro della\nNazione Picena, e 2 collegi annessi\n536. TEA TP O DI TOR DI NO NA.\n537. Yicolo di Yeccbiarelli\n538. Yicolo della Palma\n539. Confortaria pei condannati a morte\n540. Palazzo Altoviti\n541. Yestigie del Ponte Trionfale\n542. Yicolo dell'Agnello\n543. Yicolo del Grancio\n544. Strada di S. Gio. de' Fiorentini\n545. Yicolo delle Telline\n546. Palazzo Lavaiani\n547. Palazzo Niecolini\n548. Piazza del Agnello\n549. C. P. di Gio. de' Fiorentini con Spe-\ndali pei Nazionali\n550. Oratorio di S. Orsola detto il coti-\nsolato.\n551. Yicolo dell'Oro\n552. Palazzo de Rossi\n553. Cbiesa di S. M. della Purificazione\nde' Transalpini\n554. Yicolo de' Cimatori\n555. Collegio di Bandinelle\n556. Yicolo delle Palle\n557. Palazzo Saccbetti\n558. C. P. di S. Biagio della Pagnotta\n559. Cbiesa de SS. Faustino e Giovita\ndetta ancora di S. Anna de Bresciani\n560. Chiesa e Confr. di S. M. del Suffragio\n561. Oratorio annesso a detta Cbiesa\n562. Oratorio e Confr. del Confalone con\nChiesa sotterranea di S. Lucia\n563. Yicolo della Scimia\n564. Strada Giulia\n565. Cbiesa di S. Elisabetta della TJni-\nversitk de' Mendicanti Invalidi\n566. Strada di Bancbi vecchi.\n567. Palazzo del Nero\n568. Piazza di Sforza\n569. Palazzo Sforza e Cesarini\n570. Palazzo Spada\n571. Vicolo del Pavone\n572. Banco di S. Spirito\n573. Strada de' Bancbi, con 2 fontane\n574. Palazzo Cicciaporci\n575. C. P. e collegio de' SS. Gelso e Giu-\n1 ano\n576. Oratorio e Confr. del Sagr in detta\nChiesa\n577. Strada di Panico"}, {"page_pdf": 33, "page_imprimee": "31", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.33", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 7438, "texte": "578. Chiesa e Confr. di S. Giuliano\n579. Palazzo Cappoui di Firenze\n580. Palazzo Camerata\n581. Piazza di Monte Giordano con Fontana\n582. Palazzo Gabrielli\n583. Vicolo della Gatta\n584. Casa di Rafaelle d'Urbino.\n585. Strada de Coronari\n586. C. P. de' SS. Simone, e Giuda\n587. Palazzo Tanara\n588. Strada della PaJlaccorda al Fico\n589. Piazza del Avila\n590. Vicolo del Coralio\n591. Piazza del Fico\n592. Chiesa di S Biagio della Fossa del-\n1'university degli Osti\n593. Palazzo Sala\n594. Palazzo del Drago\n595. Palazzo del Antico Monte di Piety\n596. Palazzo Bonaventura\n597. Piazza della Pace\n598. Palazzo di S. M. dell'Anima\n599. C. P. di S. M. della Pace T. C. e\nMonastero de' Canonici Lateranensi\n600. Chiesa di S. M. dell'Anima della\nNazione Teutonica con couvitto de'\nPreti ed Ospizio\n601. Yicolo della Yolpe\n602. Yicolo del Sole\no it I ONE VI. - PARIONE o\n603. Chiesa di S. Nicolb de* Lorenesi\n604. Palazzo Ornani\n605. Piazza Navona con 3 Fontane e Obe-\nlisco del circo di Caracalla\n606. Chiesa di S. Giacoino de* Spagnuoli\ncon convitto de* Preti e Spedale de*\nCastiglioni\n607. Palazzo Panfili\n608. Chiesa di S. Agnese e Palaz. Panfili\n609. Palazzo Maculani\n610. Torre Millina\n611. TEATRO DELLA PACE\n612. Strada della Pace\n613. Collegio Nardini\n614. Palazzo della comp. di Sancta Sanc-\ntorum Residenza del Governatore\ndi Roma\n615. C. P. di S. Tomaso in Parione T. C.\n616. Palazzo Galli e Colloretti\n617. Vicolo de' Granari\n618. TEATR'O DE' GRANARI\n619. Chiesa e Conf. della Nativity di N.\nS. G. C. detta degli Agonizanti\n620. Piazza di Pasquino\n621. Palazzo Caraccioli P. di Santobuono\n622. Vicolo della Cuccagna\n623. Palazzo Lancellotti\n624. Chiesa di S. Pantaleone, e casa de'\nPP. delle scuole pei scuole pubbliche\n625. Palazzi Massimi\n626. Palazzo della Compag. de' SS. XII\nApostoli\n627. Palazzo Trulli\n628. Strada del Paradiso\n629. Palazzo Manfroni\n630. Piazza del Paradiso\n631. Chiesa di S. Elisabetta del univer-\nsity dei Garzoni Tedesclii de Fornare\ncon Spedale\n632. Strada de' Chiavari\n633. Piazza de' Satiri\n634. Chiesa di S. Barbara dell'Univ. de'\nLibrari\n635. C. P di S. M. di Grotta Pinta\n636. Palazzo Pio coil ruine del Teatro di\nPompeo\n637. Piazza del Biscione\n638. Piazza di Campo di Fiore con Fontana\n639. Piazza Pollaroli\n640. Strada de' Baullari\n641. Yicolo dell'Acquila\n642. Palazzo Galli\n643. Palazzo Bonardi\n644. Yicolo do Leutari\n645. Chiesa colleg. insigne, e P. di S. Lo-\nrenzo in Damaso\n646. Orat. e Confr. del Sagr. in d. Chiesa\n647. Cancelleria Apostolica\n648. Piazza, e Vicolo de' Cimatori\n649. Strada del Pellegrino\n650. Vicolo di Savelli\n651. Palazzo Buoncompagni con Torre\n652. Piazza di Sovra\n653. Strada di Panone\n654. Vicolo del Governo\n655. Palazzo Gaucei\n656. Chiesa di S. M. in Vallicella, e Casa\nde' P. P. della Congregazione del-\n1'Oratorio\n657. Orat. dell'Assunta e S. Cecilia de'\ndetti Padri\n658. Yicolo dei Cartari\n659. Yicolo di Calabraga\n660. C. P. di S. Stefano in Piscinnla\nRIONE VII, - REGOLA\n661. Chiesa di S. Luc. della Confrat. del\nConfalone con convit. di Preti Se-\ncolari\n662. Carceri Nuove\n663. Piazza Padella\n604. C. P. di S. Nicolb degli Incoronati\n665. Palazzo Mancini\n666. Chiesa di S. Filippo Neri\n667. Oratorio e Congr. delle Piaghe di\nGesii Cristo\n668. Piazza della Chiavica di S. Lucia\n669. Yicolo della Moretta\n670. Palazzo Bossi\n671. Palazzo Incoronati\n672. Palazzo de' Aste\n673. Palazzo Orsini\n674. Palazzo Rocci ora Spada\n675. Piazza di Ricci\n676. Yicolo dello Struzzo\n677. Collegio Ghislieri\n678. Chiesa dello Spirito S. de' Napolitani\n679. Orat. e Confr. de' medesimi\n680. Palazzo Ricci\n681. C. P. di S. Gio. in Ayno\n682. Strada di Monserrato\n683. Palazzo Pannini\n684. Palazzo Capponi di Firenze ,\n685. Yicolo de' Cappellari\n686. Palazzo Ghigi Montorio\n687. Vicolo di Montorio\n688. Chiesa di S M. di Monserrato degli\nAragonesi con Sped.\n689. Yicolo della Lunetta\n690. Chiesa di S. Eligio degli Orefici\n691. Strada dell'Armata\n692. Palazzo degli Atti\n693. Palazzo Falconieri\n694. Palazzo Falconiere\n695. Chiesa di S. Caterina de' Sanesi\n696. Palazzo Baldocci\n697. Chiesa di S. Tomaso Cantuariense\ne Collegio degl'Inglesi\n698. Palazzo del collegio Inglese\n699. Chiesa e Casa di S. Brigida dell'or-\ndine del Siho Salvatore\n700. Palazzo Fioravante\n701. Chiesa di S. Girolamo della Comp.\ndella Carity, e Casa per i Preti del-\nl'Oratorio\n702. C. P. di S. Caterina della Rota\n703. Chiesa e Confr. di S. M. dell' Ora-\nzione detta della Morte.\n704. Fontana detta il Mascherone di Far-\nnese\n705. Palazzo Farnese con Arco sopra\nStrada Giulia\n706. Piazza Farnese con due Fontane\n707. Yicolo del Gallo\n708. Palazzo Pighini\n709. Palazzo Mandosi\n710. Chiesa di S. M. della Quercia del-\n1'University de' Macellari\n711. Yicolo de' Yenti\n712. Palazzo di Cavalieri dell' Ordine Teu-\ntonico\n713. Chiesa de' SS. Gio. Apost. e Petro-\nnio de' Bolognese\n714. Strada della Catena\n715. Palazzo Spada\n716. Palazzo Spada gia Campo di Ferro\n717. Strada e Vicolo di Capo di Ferro\n718. Piazza di Spada\n719. Yicolo de' Batestrari\n720. Vicolo delle Grotte\n721. Strada di Giupponari\n722. Chiesa di SS. Teresa, e Gio. della\nCroce, e Ospiz. de Carmelitani Scaizi\n723. Chiesa di S. Marti no gia della Confr.\ndella Dottrina Cristiana\n724. Piazza di Monte di Pieta\n725. Cap. di S. M., e Sacro Monte di Piety\n726. Chiesa della Trinity, e Ospizio de*\nPellegrini, e Convalescenti\n727. Oratorio e confr. di detta Chiesa\n728. Strada de' Pettinari\n729. Palazzo Cacoia\n730. C. P. di S.Salvatore in Onda e Ospiz.\nde' Min. Conventuali\n731. Chiesa diS. Franc, d' Assisi, e Colleg.\nEcclesiastico, e Sped, pei Sacerdoti\n732. Ponte Gianicolo ora Ponte Sisto\n733. Conserv. de' SS. Clemente, e Cre-\nsceutino per Zitelie dettele Zoocolette\n734. Chiesa di S. Paolo Apost., e Conv.\nde' P.P. del 3 ordine di S. Francesco\nSiciliani\n735. Oratorio di S. Giacomo Apost. de'\nCappellari\n736. Piazza degli Specchi\n737. C. P. de' S. M. in Monticelli e Casa\nde' PP. della Dottrina Cristiana Avi-\ngnonesi\n738. C. P. di S. Salvat. in Campo\n739. Palazzo Alibrandi\n740. Palazzo Santa Croce\n741. Palazzo S. Croce per la Famiglia\n742. Piazza di Branca\n743. Palazzo di Signoribus\n744. Yicolo de' Sediari\n745. Strada della Regola\n746. Chiesa P. de. S.S. Vincenzo e Ana-\nstasio della Comp. di Cuochi\n747. Yicolo del Merangolo\n748. Chiesa di S. Bartolomeo de' Vaccinari\n749. Piazza de' Cenci\n750. Palazzi Cenci con due Archi\n751. C, P. di S. Tomaso a Cenci\n752. Yicolo de' Cenci\n753. Chiesa di Maria del Pi an to della\nConfr. della Dottr. Cristiana\n754. Oratorio della confr. suddetta\n755. Chiesa di S. Maria in Cacaberio de'\nCocchieri\n756. Avanzi d'un Antico Portico\nRIONE VIII. - S. EUTTACHIO\n757. C. P. di S. Maria in Publicolis\n758. Strada del Falegname\n759. C P. di S. Carlo, a Catinari e casa\ndi Bernabiti\n760. Palazzo Jacobelli\n761. Piazza del Monte della Farina\n762. Strada del Monte della Farina\n763. Chiesa di S. Anna, e Monastero de1\nBenedettine\n764. Chiesa di S. Elena de' Credenzieri\n765. Palazzo Cavalieri\n766. Palazzo Cavalierini\n767. Strada Argentina\n768. Chiesa de' SS. Cosimo, e Damiano de*\nBarbieri\n769. Oratorio de' medesimi Santi de' detti\nBarbieri\n770. Strada de' Cesarini\n771. TEATRO D'ARGENTINA\n772. Chiesa di S. Giuliano de' Fiammin-\nghi con Sped, pei Nazionali\n773. Torre Argentina nelle Case di Ce-\nsarini\n774. Chiesa dei Sudario de' Piernontesi\n775. Chiesa di S. Andrea della Valle, e\ncasa de' Teatini\n776. Vicolo deli'Abate Luigi\n777. Palazzo Coltrolini\n778. Palazzo Alberini\n779. Strada della Yalle\n780. Palazzo Couti"}, {"page_pdf": 34, "page_imprimee": "32", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.34", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 7555, "texte": "781. Palazzo Pescatori\n782. Palazzi del Bufalo\n783. Piazza della Valle\n784. Cbiesa P. di S. M. in Monterone, e\nConvit. de' P.P. della Mercede Scalzi\nI tali an i\n785. Arco Moderno della Ciambella\n786. Cbiesa di S. Benedetto e Scolastica\nde' Xorcini\n787. Palazzi Sinibaldi\n788. Vicolo di Nari\n789. Palazzo Nari\n790. Strada della Palombella\n791. Piazza de' Caprettari\n792. Palazzo Cenci\n793. Palazzo Lanti\n794. Palazzo Capranica\n795. TEATRO DELLA VALLE\n796. Vicolo del Melone\n797. Strada de' Sediari, e Taccari\n798. Strada de' Canestrari, o della Catena\ndella Sapienza\n799. Universita e Scuole pubbliche dette\nla Sapienza\n800. Chiesa di S. Tvo nella Sapienza\n801. Piazza di S. Eustachio\n802. Chiesa Coll e paroc. di d Santo D. C.\n803. Vicolo dell'Albergo de' Marcbegiani\n804. Palazzo Carpegna\n805. Piazza Madama\n806. Palazzo Medici detto di Madama con\nruine delle Terme Alessandrine\n807. Chiesa di S. Salvatore in Thermis\n808. C. P. di S. Luigi de Francesi\n809. Convit. di Preti, e Sped, dei Nazi.\n810. Vicolo de' Matriciani\n811. Piazza Lombarda\n812. Strada delle Cinque Lune\n813. Strada del Pinaco\n814. Palazzo del Collegio Germanico Un-\ngarico\n815. Collegio Germanico Ungarico\n816. C. P. di S. Agostino T. C. e Conv.\ndegli Agostiniani\n817. Fontanella, e strada della Scrofa\n818. Palazzo Casali\n819. Vicolo de' Spagnuoli\n820. Vicolo della Vaccarella\n821. Palazzo della Compagnia di Saneta\nSanctorum\n822. Palazzo Palma con Torre\n823. Palazzo Nari\n824. Palazzo Rita\n825. C. P. di S. Salvatore delle Cappelle\n826. Palazzo Accoramboni\n827. Piazza del Pozzo delle Cornaccbie\n828. Palazzo di S. Giacomo de Spagnuoli\n829. Palazzo Patrizi\n830. Piazza Rondinina\n831. Palazzo Borghese\n832. Palazzo Giustiniani\n833. Avanzi di un antico Portico\n834. Piazza della Rotonda con fontana e\nGuvlia\n835. Palazzo Crescenzi\n836. Palazzo Melchiorri\no RIONE IX. - PIGNA o\n837. Cbiesa Colleg. e paroc. di S. Maria\nad Marty res detta la Rotonda D. C.\ngia Pantheon\n838. Orat. e Confr. del Sagr, in d. Chiesa\n839. Palazzino Corsini Palombara\n840. Accademia Ecclesiastica\n841 Cap. di S. Caterina da Siena dentro\nla Casa della Comp. della Nunziata\n842. Piazza della Minerva con' Elefante,\ne Guglia\n843. Palazzo de' Domenicani della Mi-\nnerva\n844. C. P. di S. Maria Sopra Minervg T.\nC., e conv. de' Domenicani\n845. Strada di Pie di Marmo\n846. Piazza del Collegio Romano\n847. Cbiesa di S. Tgnazio Collegio de' Ge-\nsniti, e Scuole pubbliche dette il\nCollegio Romano\n848. Orat. di S. Maria della Piet& detto\ndel P. Caravita con Arco\n849. Palazzo de' Carolis\n850. Fontana del Facchino\n851. Cbiesa colleg. e P. di S. Maria in\nVia Lata Diaconia Cardinalizia\n852. Palazzo Panfili con R. A.\n853. Palazzo Panfili\n854 Palazzo Panfili\n855. Palazzo Verospi\n856. Palazzo d'Aste\n857. Palazzo Gottiftedi\n858. Vicolo della Gatta\n859. Chiesa di S. Marta, e Monast. di\nA gostiniane\n860. C. P. di S. Stefano del Cacco, eMo-\nnastero di Silvestrini\n861. Palazzo Altieri\n862. Palazzo Inganni\n863. Palazzo Colonna\n864. Scuole delle Mastre Pie\n865. Palazzo Amadei\n866. Cbiesa e Confr. delle Stimate di S.\nFrancesco\n867. Palazzi Marescotti\n868. Palazzo Cesi\n869. Chiesa di S. Gio. della Pigna\n870. Palazzo Nunez\n871. Palazzo Foseca\n872. Vicolo de Cestari\n873. Cbiesa di S. Chiara e Monastero di\nMonache di detta Santa\n874* Ruine delle Terme di Marco Agrippa\n875. Strada detta l'Arco della Ciambella\n876. Palazzo della Prelatura Spinola\n877. Palazzo Muti Sacchetti\n878. Palazzo della Prelatura Bussi\n879. Palazzo Strczzi\n880. Falazzo Origo\n881. Piazza Strozzi\n882. Palazzo Cesarini\n883. C. P. di S. Nicolo a Cresarini, e casa\nde Somaschi unita con arco\n884. Colonne 4 Antiche nel Coitile de'\ndette Somaschi\n885. Palazzo Colonna di Sonnino\n886. Torre nelPAbitazione Persiani\n887. Piazza, e Chiavica dell'Olmo\n888. Strada Florida\n889. Vicolo de' Cesarini\n890. Ospizio de' Preti Pellegrini\n891. Nuova Casa. e Scuole pie de' P. P.\ndelle Scuole pie\n892. Arco de' Ginnasi\n893. C. P. di S. Lucia delle Botteghe\noscure e Monastero de' Teresiane\n894. Palazzo Ginnasi\n895. Collegio Ginnasi\n896 Via Celsa\n897. Palazzo Montemarte\n898. Palazzo della comp. del Salvat. ad\nSan eta Sanctorum\n899. Palazzo Viseardi\n900. Palazzo Petroni\n901. Palazzo Petroni\n902. Cbiesa del Gesh, e Casa Professa\nde' Gesniti\n903. Palazzo di Venezia\n904. Vicolo di Madonna Lucrezia\n905. Cap. della B. V. presso S. Marco\n906. Piazza di Venezia con Fontana\n907. Cbiesa Colleg. e Paroc. di S. Marco\nT. C.\nRIONE X. - CAMPITELLI\n908. Orat., e Confr. di S. Gregorio Tau-\nmaturgo\n909. Palazzo Circi\n910. C. P. di S. Venanzo de' Camerinesi\n911. Palazzo Muti Bussi\n912. Palazzo Silvestri\n913. Palazzo Gamberuoci\n914. Cbiesa della B. Rita de' Casciani\n915. Vicolo della Pedacchia\n916. Palazzo dell'eredita di Pietro da\nCortona\n917. Cbiesa di S Maria d'Araeeli T. C.\ne conv. de' Min. Osservanti\n918. Palazzo del Mnseo Capitolino\n919. Palazzo detto dei Conservatori\n920. Resideuza del Senatore con Torre e\nCarceri an nesse\n921. Chiesa di S. Giuseppe de' Falegnami\nsopra la Carcere di S. Piet.ro\n921. Cbiesa della Carcere di S. Pietrodetta\nMaraertina e da molti Tulliana\n922. Orat. di S Giuseppe de' 1 alegnami\n923. Colonne del Tempio di Giove Tonante\n924. Portico del Tempio della Concordia\n925. Colonna Antica\n926. Dogana della Grascia con Torre\n927. Piazza di Carapo Vaccino con Fon-\ntana.\n928. Tre Anticlie Colonne Scanellate\n929. Cbiesa di S. M. Liberatrice\n930. R. dell'A. Palazzo de* Cesari\n931. Cbiesa di S. Bonaventura e conv\nde' Min. Osservanti del Ritiro\n932. Chiesa di S. Sabastiano alia pol-\nveriera\n933. Torre alia via della Polveriera\n934. Meta Sndante\n935. Arco di Costantino Magno\n936. Camp, di S. Maria della Pieta denfro\nl'ANTFITEATRO FLAYIO DETTO\nIL COLOSSEO\n937. Fenile prima sped, di S. Gio. La-\nterano\n938. Cbiesa di SS. Quattro Coronati T. C.\ne mouastero di Agostinianee conserv.\ndelle Or fane con Torre\n939. Cbiesa di S. Silvest.ro degli Scultori\ne Scarpelliiii annessa a d. Cbiesa\n940. Cbiesa di S. Maria Imperatriee\n941. Chiesa di S. Tomaso in Formis\n942. Chiesa di S. M. in Domenica T. C.\ne Monast. di Melchiti di S. Basilio\n943. Piazza della Navicella con Navi\nVotiva\n944. Obelisco nella Villa Mattei\n945. Cap. del Crocefisso nella Piazza\ndella Ferratella\n946. Cbiesa di S. Gio. a Porta Latina T.\nC. e Conv. de' Minimi della Pro-\nvincia Romana\n947. Cap. di S. Gio. in Oleo\n948. Arco di Neron Claudio Druso\n949. Chiesa di S. Sisto T. C. e conv. di\nDomenicani Irlandesi\n950. Cap. di S. Domenico Annessa\n951. Strada di S. Sisto Vecchio\n952. Vicolo delle Mole\n, 953. Luogo del Settizonio di Severo Imp.\n954. Chiesa di S. Gregorio Magno sul\nMonte Celio, e Monast. di Carnal-\ndolesi\n955. Cap. di S. Silvia in S. Gregorio\n956. Cap. di S. Andrea Apost. in S. Gre-\ngorio\n957. Cap. di S. Barbara in S Gregorio\n958. Chiesa di SS. Gio. e Paolo T. C. e\nNoviziato de' Missionari\n959. Ruina della Curia Ostilia\n960. Cap. di S. Maria de' Cerclii\n961. Cbiesa Colleg. di S. Anastasia T. C.\n962. Cbiesa di S. Teodoro creduta gi&\nTempio di Romolo\n963. Orat. e Confr. del Cuore di Gesu\n964. Strada delle Grazie\n► 965. Vicolo de' Fecili\n966. Cbiesa di S. M. della Consolazione\n967. Sped pergli Uomini feriti\n; 968. Cbiesa di S. Maria delle Grazie\n969. Spedale per le donne\n' 970. Strada di Monte Tarpeo\n. 971. Salita di Monte Caprino\n972.. Vicolo de' Saponari\n973. Vicolo della Bufbla e Muri Anicbi\n974. Piazza Montanara\n975. Chiesa di S. Maria in Vinci di Sa-\nponari\n976. Piazza della Catena, e Strada de'\nSngarari\n977. Oratorio di S. Andrea in Vinci degli\nScultori, e Scarpellini\n978. Rocca Tarpea\n979. Palazzo Oatfarelli\n980. Strada e Torre de' Specchi"}, {"page_pdf": 35, "page_imprimee": "33", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.35", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 7782, "texte": "981. Chiesa e Confr. di S. Orsola e Ca-\nterina\n982. Ospizio de' Cistercien. delle Tre\nFontane\n983. Ospizio de' Geronimini di S. Alessio\n984. Palazzo Massimi\n985. Palazzo Ruspoli\n986. Chiesa di S. Francesca Rom. e Mo-\nnastero di Oblate dette di Tor de1\nSpecehi\n987. Palazzo Capizucchi\n988. Palazzo Artieri con Arco\n989. C. P. di S. M. in Portico da di Cam -\npitelli D. O. e Casa de Chierici Rego-\nlari della Madre di Dio\n990. Palazzo Cavalletti\n991. Piazza Capizucchi\n992. Palazzo Cardelli\n993. Palazzo Maccarani\n994. Piazza Margana\n995. Palazzo Astalli\nR I O N E XT. - S. ANG E L O\n996. Palazzo della Congr. de1 Nobili al\nGesu con Torre\n997. Palazzo Mattei di Paganica\n998. Strada delle Botteghe oscure\n999. Chiesa del Salvat. e S. Stanislao, e\nOspiz de* Polacchi\n1000. Vicolo de1 Polacchi\n1001. Palazzo Altieri\n1002. Palazzo Patrizi\n1003. Chiesa di S Caterina de Funari e\nMonastero di Agostinne, e conserv.\ndi Zitelle\n1004. Palazzo Mattei di Giove\n1005. Palazzo Negroni\n1006. Palazzo Mattei di Paganica\n1007. Piazza Paganica\n1008. Palazzo Moroni\n1009. Chiesa di S. Sebastiano de'Mercanti\n1010. Palazzo della comp. della Nunziata\nora depositaria Urbana\n1011. Palazzo Boccapaduli\n1012. Piazza Costaguti\n1013. Palazzo Santa Croce con Torre\n1014. Collegio delPTJmbria\n1015. Palazzo Costaguti\n1016. Piazza Mattei con fontana\n1017. Chiesa di S. Ambrogio della Mas-\nsima, e monasterio di Benedettine\n1018. Piazza Serlupi\n1019. Palazzo Serlupi\n1020. Chiesa Colleg., e Paroc. di S. An-\ngelo in Pascaria D. C.\n1021. Orat. di S. Andrea de* Pescivendoli\n1022. Palazzo Orsini gia TEATRO DI\nMAR CELLO\n1023. Piazza di Pescaria e Colonne An-\ntichi\n1024. Strada di Pescaria\n1025. Piazza Giudea fuori del Ghetto con\nfontana Ghetto degli Ebrei\n1026. Piazza Giudea dentro del Ghetto\n1027. Strada della Rua\n1028. Piazza de' Marcelli\n1029. Piazza delle Scuole con Fontana\n1030. Cinque Scuole degli Ebrei cioe Ca-\ntalana Siciliana, Castigliana Scuola\nnuova, e Scuola del Tempio\n1031 Strada della Finmara\n1032. Vicolo della Torre\n1033. Piazza delle 3 cannelle con font,la\n1034. Yicolo de' Savelli con fontana\n1035. Strada Quattrocapi\no RIO N E XII. - R I P A o\n1036. Chiesa di S. Gregorio a Ponte 4\nCapi e congr. della divina Piety\n1037. Palazzo dell'Emo Lercari\n1038. C. Colleg. e P. di S. Niccolo in\nCarcere D. C.\n1039. Orat , e Confr. del Sagramento in\n1040. Cliiesa di S. Galla, e Ospiz. per gli\nDomini\n1041. Ospiz. di S. Luigi Gonzaga per le\nDonne\n1042. Strada e Arco di Porta Leone\n1043. Piazza e Yicolo della Fontanella\n1044. Strada delle Carrozze'\n1045. Yicolo di Buccimazza\n1046. Chiesa di S. Omobono de' Sartori\n1047. Chiesa di S. Eligio de' Ferrari\n1048. Orat. di S. Eligio de' medesimi\n1049. Chiesa di S. Gio. Decollato della\nConfr. della Misericordia\n1050. Orat. di S. Gio. della medesima\n1051. Sepoltura de' Giustiziati\n1052. Sepoltura di S. Aniano de' Pia-\nnellari e Lavorati Calzolari\n1053. Arco detto di Giano\n1054. Arco eretto da Negozianti a Set-\ntimio Severo\n1055. Chiesa di S. Giorg'o in Velabro D.\nC. e Ospiz. di Agostiniani di Genova\n1056. Acqua Juturna\n1057. Luogo ove si seppelliscono i Giudei\n1058. Luogo del Circo Massimo\n1059. Chiesa di S. Prisca T. C. e Ospiz.\ndi Agostiniani Lombardi con R. A.\n1060. Chiesa di S. Balbina T. C e casa\ndi Pii Operari con Torre\n1061. Chiesa di SS. Nereo, e Achilleo T. C.\n1062. Chiesa di S. Cesareo T. C.\n1063. Acqnedotto di Claudio\n1064. Terme Antoniane\n1065. Conserve dell'Acqua di d. Terme\n3066. Chiesa di S. Saba\n1067. Cap. di S. Maria dell'Arco in un\nTorrione\n1068. Sepolcro di Caio Cestio\n1069. Luogo ove si seppelliscono i Pro-\ntestanti\n1070. Ruine dell'Emporio\n1071. Yicolo della Serpe\n1072. Strada della Marmorata con Arco\n1073. Cap. di S. Lazaro a Marmorata\n1074. Bastione di Paolo III\n1075. Chiesa di S. M. del Priorato\n1076. Chiesa di S. Alessio T. C. e Monast.\ndi Geronimini Lombardi\n1077. Chiesa di S. Sabina T. C. e con-\nvento de' Domenicani\n1078. Cap di S. M. Maggiore in Aventino\n1019. Ruine delle Terme di Traian Decio\nImp.\n1080. Strada della Salara con Arco\n1081. Antiche Saline\n1082. Antiche ruine\n1083. Yestigie del Ponte Snblicio\n1084. Chiesa di S Anna <le' Calzettari\n1085. Yioolo della Greca\n1086. Chiesa Colleg. insigne e paroc. di\nS. M, in Cosmedin D. C. detta la\nboccadella, Yerita, e ruine del Tem-\npio della Pudicizia\n1087. Piazza della Bocea della Yerita con\nfontana e font anile\n1088. Sbocco della Cloaca Massima\n1089. Chiesa di S. M. del Sole prima\nS. Stefano delle Carozze gi& Tem-\npio Antico\n1090. Chiesa di S. M. Egiziaca e ospiz.\ndegli Armeni gia Tempio della For-\ntuna Virile\n1091. Casa del Yolgo detta di Pilato\n1092. Ponte Fabricio or Quattro Capi\n1093. Chiesa di S. Gio. Calibita e conv.\nde' Benfratelli d'Italia\n1094. Sped, de' Suddetti\n1095. Yicolo della Moletta\n1096. Muri Antichi\n1097. Vicolo del Isnla, e muri antichi\n1098. C. P. di S- Bartolomeo all'Isola T.\nC. e conv. de' Min. osservanti con\nTorre\n1099. Ponte Cestio, or di S. Bartolomeo\nRIONE XIII. - TRASTEVERE\n1100. Piazza di Molara\n1101. Chiesa di S. Eligio de Sellari\n1102. Piazza delle Gensole\n1103. Yicolo delle Boccie\n1104. C. P. di S. Benedetto in Piscinola\n1105. Vicolo della Scarpetta\n1106. Strada della Malva\n1107. Ponte Senatorio or Ponte Rotto\n1108. C. P. di S. Salvatore a Ponte Rotto\n1109. Strada de' Vascellari\n1110. Orat. di S. Andrea de' Vascellari\n1111. Strada de' Salumi\n1112. Vicolo de' Frati\n1113. Yicolo della Palma\n1114. Piazza de' Vascellari\n1115. Yicolo de' Vascellari\n1116. Chiesa di S. M. in Cappella\n1117. Strada anicia, e Frangipaua\n1118. Strada Gregoriana\n1119. Conser. di S. Pasquale per Zitelle\n1120. Chiesa di S. Gio. de Genovesi con\nSpedale\n1121. C. P. di S. Cecilia T. C. e Monast.\nde' Benedettine\n1122. Chiesa di S. M. dell'Orto di 13 Uni-\nversity unite\n1123. Sped, di d. University\n1124. Vicolo del Canale\n1125. Dogana da del passo del Vino\n1126. Dogana di Ripa Grande\n1127. Chiesa di S. M. del buon Viaggio\nannessa alia chiesa di S. Agata in\nTrastevere\n1128. Chiesa della Traffigurazione del\nSig. dentro l'Ospiz. Apost. detto di.\nS. Micliele\n1129. Ospiz. per le donne iuvalide\n1130. Ospiz. per gli Uomini invalidi\n1131. Ospiz. per i Fanciulli in cura de'\nPP. delle Scnole Pie\n1132. Casa di Correzion de' Fanciulli\n1133. Carceri delle donno\n1134. Chiesa di S. Franc, a Ripa e conv.\ndi Min. Osserv. Riformati\n1135. Strada di Monticelli\n1136. Chiesa di SS. Cosmo, e Damiano\ndetta di S- Oosmato e Monastero di\nMonache di S. Chiara\n1137. Mura di Settimo Severo\n1138. Piazza di Fontana Secca\n1139. Chiesa di S. Pasquale giy ,SS. 40\nM. N. e conv. de' Min. Osserv.\nScalzi Spagnuoli\n1140. Strada delle Fratte\n1141. Strada delle Rim esse\n1142. Piazza di Monte di Fiore\n1143. C. P. di S. Grisogono T. C. e conv.\nde' Carmelit. della Congregazione di\nMantova\n1444. Orat. e Confr. della B.V. del Carmine\n1145. Piazza della Crocetta\n1146. Chiesa Paroc. di S. Salvat. della\nCorte, e Ospizio de Minimi della\nProv. Romana\n1147. Yicolo del Bnco\n1148. Yicolo della Crociata\n1149. Strada delle due Mole\n1150. Yicolo della Stella\n1151. Piazza dell'Olmo\n1152. Strada. I iazza del Muro Novo\n1153. Yicolo di Sacchetti\n1154. Chiesa di S. Bonosa de' Calzolai\n1155. Yicolo dell'Aicaccio\n1156. Chiesa di S. Agata, e Colleg. de'\nPP. della Dottr. Cristiana di Roma,\ne Scuole Pie\n1157. Piazza Romana\n1158. Torre della S. Casa di Loreto\n1159. Chiesa di S. M., e S. Gallicano\n1160. Sped, per gli Uomini\n1161. Sped, per le donne\n1162. Yicolo del Pozzo\n1163. Palazzo delle Monache di S. Anna\n1164. Chiesa di S. Calisto T. C. e Ospiz.\nde' Monaci Cassinensi\n1165. Chiesa Colleg. insigne di S. M, in\nTrastevere\n1166. Orat. e Contr. del Sagr. in d. Chiesa\n1167. Palazzo Ossoli\n1168. Palazzo Leoni\n1169. Chiesa di S. Apollonia e Monast.\ndi Monache del 3 Ordine di S. Franc.\n1170. Chiesa di S. Marg.ta, e Monast. d.\nMonache del 3 ordine di S. Franc0"}, {"page_pdf": 36, "page_imprimee": "34", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.36", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6475, "texte": "1171. C hie&a delle SS.. Rutin a, e Seconda\nMonast di Oblate Agostiniane\n1172. Piazza Ruaccia\n1173. Yicolo della Renella\n1174. Yicolo del Moro\n1175. Piazza di Renzi\n117«. Yicolo del Pelliccia\n1177. Yicolo del Cipresso\n1178. Piazza e Yicolo del Cinque\n1179. Piazza di Ponte Sisto\n1180. Yicolo del Bologna\n1181. Strada della Scala\n1182. Chiesa di S. Egidioero e Monastero\ndi Carmelitane Scalze\n1183. Yicolo del Leoncino\n1184. Yicolo del Merangolo\n1185. Vicolo della Frusta\n1186. Chiesa di S. Pietro in Montorio T.\nT. e Conv. de Min. Osservanti Ri-\nformati\n1187. Cap. della Crucifissione di S. Pietro\n1188. Piazza Pensile con Fontana\n1189. Cap. di S. Antonio di Padova\n1190. Fontana dell'acqua Paola\n1191. Acquedotto dell'acqua Paola\n1192. Orto Botanico della Sapienza\n1193. Bosco Parrasio degli Arcadi\n1194. Conservatorio dell'Assunta\n1195. Fabbrica del Tabacco\n1196. Chiesa di S. Maria de 7 dolori e\nMonastero di Oblate Agostiniane\n1197. Strada del Mattonato\n1198. Yicolo del Canestraro\n1199. Chiesa di S. Maria della Scala D.\nC. e Conv. de' Carmelit. Scalzi\n1200. Orat. e Confr. di S. Teresa in d. Ch.\n1201. Piazza degli Fornaci\n1202. Strada Benedetta\n1203. C. P. di S. Gio. della Malva e easa\nde Ministri degli Infermi\n1204. Orat. e Confr. del Sagr. in d. Chiesa\n1205. Vicolo de' Moroni\n1206. Chiesa di S. Dorotea, e Ospiz. de'\nMin. Conventuali della Provincia\nRoman a\n1207. Porta Settimiana\n1208. Strada della Longara\n1209. Yicolo de' Riari\n1210. Palazzo e Orti Corsini\n1211. Palazzo e Giardino Farnese\n1212. Antieo Palazzo di Agostino Ghigi\noggi Farnese\n1213. Strada de' Riari\n1214. Chiesa di S. Croce, e Monastero di\nAgostiniane della Penitenza\n1215. Yicolo delle Scalette\n1216. Chiesa di S. Giacomo e Monast. di\nMonache di le Convertite\n1217. Strada di S. G iacomo gik via Mas-\nsimi\n1218. Palazzo Lanti\n1219. Yicolo dir Spagna\n1220. Chiesa della Concezione e Monastero\ndi Oblate Camaldolesi\n1221. Ch iesa di S. M. Regina Coeli, e\nMonast. di Carmelitane Scalze\n1222. Strada di Regina Coeli\n1223. Chiesa della Yisitazione e Monast.\ndi Monache di S. Franc, di Sales\n1224. Vicolo d'Aliberti\n1225. Chiesa di S. Giusep., e Casa de'\nPii Operari\n1226. Chiesa di S. Leonardo e Ospiz. di\nEremiti Camaldolesi di Monte Ca-\nrona\n1227. Palazzo Salviati\n1228. Chiesa di S. Onofrio T. C. e conv.\nd'Eremiti del B. Pietro da Pisa\n1229. Luogo ove SermoneggianO i PP.\ndella Congr. dell'Orat.\n1230. Conserv. di S. M. dell'Rifugio detto\ndelle Penitent! del P.re Bussi\n1231. Conserv. di S. M. della Clemenza\ndetta delle Malmaritate\n1232. Cap. di S. Maddalena nello Sped,\nde' Pazzi\n1233. Sped, de Pazzi per Gli TJomini\n1234. Sped, per le donne\n1235. Cap. del SS. Crocifisso nel Ceme-\nterio di S. Spirito\ni R ION E XI V . - BORGO\n1236. Bastioni a' S. Spirito\n1237. Porta di S. Spirito\n1238. Cbiesa Paroc. di S. Spirito in Sascia,\ne Casa de' Canonici Regolari Ospi-\ntalieri\n1239. Palazzo della Residenza del Com-\nmendator di S. Spirito\n1240 Chiesa di S. Tecla in S. Spirito, e\nconserv. delle Fancinlle Projette\n■ 1241. Conserv. de' Fanciulle Projette\n1242. Sped, di S. Spirito\n1243. Aggiunta a' d' Sped, fatta da N.\nS. Benedetto XIY\n1244. Strada di Borgo S. Spirito\n1245. Orat. e Confr. di S. Spirito\n1246. Strada di Borgo Yecchio\n1247. Strada di Borgo Nnovo\n1248. C. P. di S. Giacomo Scossacavalli,\ne Piazza con Fontana\n1249. Orat., e Confr. del Sagr. in d. Ch.\n1250. Chiesa di S. Filippo Neri, e ospiz.\ndi quel che si convertono alia Fede\nCattolica\n1251. Palazzo deil'Ospizio suddetto\n1252. Abitazione de P.P. Gesuiti peni-\ntenzieri di S. Pietro in Yaticano\n1253. Piazza Sannesia\n1254. Palazzo Cavalieri gia Sannesi\n1255. Palazzo Serristori\n1256. Palazzo Cesi\n1257. Chiesa di S. Lorenzo in Piscibns e\nXoviziato de' P.P. delle Scuole pie\ne scuole publicbe de' medesimi\n1258. Palazzo Marij con Quartiere della\nGuardia Reale\n1259. Cbiesa di SS. Michele, e Magno\n1260. Palazzo Barberini con Yilla\n1261. Palazzo Cesi\n1262. Strada della Catena\n1263. Strada delle Carrette\n1264. Si to della Chiesa gia di S. Salva-\ntore al Torrione unita al Palazzo del\nS. Offizio :\n1265. Palazzo e Carceri del S. Offizio\n1266. Yicolo del Leoncino\n1267. Cappeletta della B. Y. Sotto l'Arco\ne Abitazione de Cavalligeri\n1267. Yicolo del Perugino\n1269. Strada di Campo Santo\n1270. Strada del Braccio\n1271. Chiesa di S. M. di Pietk in Campo\nSanto della Xazion Tedesca\n1272. Orat., e confr, di detta Xazione in\nd. Chiesa\n1273. Sped, di Campo Santo per le donne\nTedesche\n1274. Chiesa di S. Stefano degli Ungari\ndel Coll. Germanico Ungarico\n1275. Yicolo della Scalone\n1276. Cap. della Concezione\n1277. Seminario del Capitolo di S. Pietro\n1278. Chiesa di S. Martae, e Ospiz. de'\nTrinitsri Scalzi Italiani\n1279. Chiesa di S. Stefano, e ospiz. di\nMonaci Copti di S. Antonio Abate\n1280. Piazza del Fosso con Fontana\n1281. Acquedotto dell'Acqua Paola\n1282. Strada Scaccia\n1283. Mnra della Citta fatte da S. Leone IY\n1284. Sagrestia di S. Pietro in Yaticano\n1285. Chiesa Patriarc. e Paroc. di S. Pie-\ntro in Vaticano\n1286. Piazza di S. Pietro con 2 Fontane\ne obelisco gia del Circo di Nerone\n1287. Palazzi Pontifici Yatic. e Giardino\n1.288. Zecca Pontificia\n1289. Chiesa di S. Martino degli Svizzeri\n1290. Quartiere della Guardia Svizzera\n1291. Porta Antica di Roma e Corridore\ndi Alessandro YI\n1293. Strada di Borgo Angelico\n1293. Chiesa di S. Anna de Parafrenieri\n1294. Chiesa e confr. di S. Egidio\n1295. Chiesa di S. Pellegrino della Guar-\ndia Svizzera\n1296. Chiesa di S. M. delle Grazie, e conv.\nde' Romiti di Porta Angelica\n1297. Strada di Borgo Angelico\n1298. Strada di Borgo Vittorio\n1299. Piazza delle Yaschette\n1300. Piazza di Catalone\n1301. Strada di Borgo Pio\n1302. Strada del Campanile\n1303. Yicolo d'Orfeo\n1304. Yicolo delle Palle\n1305. Yicolo del Farinone\n1306. Yicolo del Mascherino\n1307. Piazza del Mascherino\n1308. Palazzo Accoramboni\n1309. Chiesa di S. M. della Purita de'\ncaudetari de* Sig.ri Card, con Arco\n1310. Palazzo Giraud\n1311. C. P. di S. M. Traspontina T. C. e\nCon. di Carmelitani\n1312. Orat. per la Dottrina Cristiana\n1313. Strada di Borgo S, Angelo\n1314. Chiesa di S. Angelo in Borgo\n1315. Orat. e Confr. di S. Angelo\n1316. Yicolo dei Frati\n1317. Yicolo del Yillano\n1318. Ponte Elio. o' Adriano, or S. Angelo\nJ 319. Mole Adriana, or Castel S. Angelo\n1320. Chiesa della B. Y. del Rosario den-\ntro il Castello\nTWO ABB RE VI AT10 NS.\nFrequently recurring.\nT. C. - Titolo Cardinalizio\nD. C. - Diaconia Cardinalizia\nERRATA.\nFor 331 Teatro Capranica read: 331\nPalazzo Capranica.\nROME\nWAS NOT\nBUILT\nI N A\nDAY"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c031", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c031", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "35", "page_fin": "35", "image_debut": 37, "image_fin": 37, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.4", "titre_corps": "THE PRIVATE TEAT RING OF THE COLLEGIO ROMANO IN ROMA", "titre_sommaire": "THE PRIVATE TEAT RING OF THE COLLEGIO ROMANO IN ROMA", "signature_source": "J. S", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 37, "page_imprimee": "35", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.37", "debut_caractere": 69, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1518, "texte": "THE PRIVATE TEAT RING\nOF THE COLLEGIO ROMANO\nIN ROMA\nJ. S.\n\nFROM THE CONTINUATION OF DUMONT'S\n41 PARALLfeLE DES PLANS ET DES PLUS\nBELLES SALLES DES SPECTACLES PUBLIQUES\no D'EUROPE\" OF 1760. o\nThis Continuation teas published 1775.\nI have selected these two and six other plans and\ndesigns of stages and stage scenes because they\nillustrate a point in the development of the Theatre\nin Roma in the 18th century,\nI have not seen them reproduced in any book\nor journal since they were first printed in that\ncentury. Every day it is the very celebrated\n\" La Scala \" at Milano, or the equally celebrated\n44 San Carlo \" in Napoli which we see reproduced\nfor us, until surely the world is in danger of\ngrowing tired of them.\nnpHE date when the theatre was put up in the\n•*» Collegio Romano is unknown to me : whether\nthere was one only or the place had more is also\nunknown to me.\nColleges in Italy were not slow to provide\ngood stages for the students and their study of\ndeportment and speech. In Parma in the first\nhalf of the 17th century we find in the Collegio\ndei Nobili such a theatre. This College continued\nto improve its theatre, and about 1652 had mo-\nveable scenes of the triangular kind of which Sab-\nbattini had written in 1637 ; and by about 1750\nhad two Theatres, one large and one small.\nThe point I wish to make, is, that documents\nexist which show us very complete Italian College\nTheatres, and that they are not merely temporary\nstages."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c032", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c032", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "35", "page_fin": "35", "image_debut": 37, "image_fin": 37, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.4.1", "titre_corps": "MECHANISM INSTALLED IN THE TEATRINO OF THE COLLEGIO ROMANO IN ROMA", "titre_sommaire": "MECHANISM INSTALLED IN THE TEATRINO OF THE COLLEGIO ROMANO IN ROMA", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 37, "page_imprimee": "35", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.37", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 67, "texte": "MECHANISM INSTALLED IN THE TEATRINO\nOF THE COLLEGIO ROMANO IN ROMA."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c034", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c034", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "36", "page_fin": "36", "image_debut": 38, "image_fin": 38, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.5", "titre_corps": "THE THREE LARGE ROMAN THEATRES OF THE 18th CENTURY", "titre_sommaire": "THE THREE LARGE ROMAN THEATRES OF THE 18th CENTURY", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 38, "page_imprimee": "36", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.38", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 939, "texte": "THE THREE LARGE ROMAN THEATRES OF THE 18th CENTURY.\n£. TEATRO ALIBERTI in Via Margutta. 2. TEATRO ARGENTINA in Strada de' Cesarini. 3. TEATRO\nTOR DI NONA opposite Castel Sant'Angelo.\nAll three were public Theatres. The Tor di Nona was first built in 1660 but soon destroyed by fire; it was\nrebuilt in 1671 : destroyed in 1698, and rebuilt in 1735, and this is the plan given above (fig 3). This buil-\nding was destroyed by fire in 1780, and again built in 1781 ; it fell in ruins in 1785 when it was again rebuilt,\nand again in 1795; restored in 1830, restored again in 1867, it was finally destroyed in 1882, and in 1886 demo-\nlished for ever to make room for a new embankment to the Tevere. Surely few Theatres have been more\nPhoenix-like. The Teatro Alibert or Aliberti (fig. /), first known as Teatro delle Dame, built in 1718, was\nburnt at the end of the 19th century. The Teatro Argentina (fig. 2) was built in 1732 and still exists."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c036", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c036", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "n. p.", "page_fin": "n. p.", "image_debut": 39, "image_fin": 39, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.6", "titre_corps": "REPRODUCED FROM THE LIBRETTO OF 4< CARLO MAGNO n ROMA 1729", "titre_sommaire": "REPRODUCED FROM THE LIBRETTO OF 4< CARLO MAGNO n ROMA 1729", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 39, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.39", "debut_caractere": 123, "fin_caractere_exclue": 232, "texte": "REPRODUCED FROM THE LIBRETTO OF 4< CARLO MAGNO n ROMA 1729.\nENGRAVINGS BY BALPASAR GABBUGGINi AND F. VASCONI."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c037", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c037", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "n. p.", "page_fin": "n. p.", "image_debut": 39, "image_fin": 39, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.6.1", "titre_corps": "THE PRIVATE TEATRINO OF CARDINALOTTOBONI", "titre_sommaire": "THE PRIVATE TEATRINO OF CARDINALOTTOBONI", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 39, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.39", "debut_caractere": 234, "fin_caractere_exclue": 344, "texte": "THE PRIVATE TEATRINO OF CARDINALOTTOBONl\nin Roma, designed and built by the Architect Juvarra circa\n1700-1705."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c038", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c038", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "n. p.", "page_fin": "n. p.", "image_debut": 39, "image_fin": 39, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.6.2", "titre_corps": "SCENE FROM THE OPERA \"CARLO MAGNO\"", "titre_sommaire": "SCENE FROM THE OPERA \"CARLO MAGNO\"", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 39, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.39", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 121, "texte": "SCENE FROM THE OPERA \"CARLO MAGNO\",\nproduced in 1729 in the Ottoboni Teatrino and designed by\nN. Michetti: 1729.\nPlate 2."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c039", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c039", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "37", "page_fin": "40", "image_debut": 41, "image_fin": 44, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.7", "titre_corps": "THE PRETTY THEATRE", "titre_sommaire": "THE PRETTY THEATRE", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 41, "page_imprimee": "37", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.41", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4066, "texte": "THE PRETTY\nTHEATRE\n\nPART TWO\nAS I said in my opening notes on this\ntheme, I do not intend to be critical. My\npurpose is more that of the print-collector\nthan of the writer.\nHave you not seen this print-collector in\nsome old shop, in Rue de la Seine or Rue\ndes Beaux Arts, as he sits by the hour\nturning over hundreds of prints of all subjects\nand of all centuries.... silent.... pausing to\nlook at some, turning over others without more\nthan a glance, picking out with deliberation,\nbut without a word said, one here, one\nthere ; laying them in a heap. Then, after a\ngood three hours' search, silently paying for\nthese, ....going home.... undoing his package....\ngoing more slowly over each print.... saying\nnothing.\nMy purpose is his: he thinks a devil of\na lot, may be ; but whatever he thinks it is\nhis delight in the print as a print, including\nsubject, condition of the print, name of en-\ngraver, date, quality of the work and price.\nAnd so is it here with me. If some are\ncensorious, when they hear of Mile. Guimard,\nSophie Arnould and Madame Montansier, to\nselect three of the most remarkable names\nfrom a big bouquet, .... if some find the private\ntheatres of the first two ladies mere hot-beds\nof vice and the many public theatres ruled\nover by the third dens of infamy, I have come\nto look on them as the old print collector looks\nupon his treasures. They have cost me very\nlittle, and have given me great pleasure:\nI have read so much about them, seen the\nhouses they made and seen them recorded again;\n1 have seen them die : even come to forget\nthem in the centuries which followed: remem-\nbered them again while contemplating subse-\nquent centuries : see them again now. I for\none cannot pick one of them out for censure.\nBut I muse at times: La Guimard is\nworth the threepence I gave for her: Sophie\nat a golden guinea was not dear: Madame\nMontansier .... I would any day give again\nthe shilling I was asked for her and without\na murmur.\nIf the price is sometimes low, what of that:\nI gave what the print-seller asked. For a song\nby Mozart there is no price, ....so rare that\nfew can hear it, so cheap that anyone may\nhave it: for a glance at the Palazzo Ducale\nin Genova nothing is asked ; you may even\npass it for nothing and not see it. So that\nit seems that the price of a thing is nothing\nby which to guage the value : \" nothing for\nnothing and dam little for sixpence \" sounds\npretty so far as it goes, but the sound is its\nprincipal asset. There is not truth there.\nYou sometimes can get all for nothing and\nsometimes for a thousand pounds nothing.\nThe pretty is often held to be so cheap\nthat it is not worth any notice at all; and\nassuredly a little of it can be afforded by any\nof us and is useful to all. It is useless to\ndeny that. \"Whether in certain centuries it\nwas worth quite so much as the price put on\nit is another matter. I cannot tell; ....I leave\nit to the Due d'Orleans and the Prince d'Henin\nto settle that between them.... if they ever\nmeet nowadays.\nThe pretty, spite of it being so cheap,\npossibly cost the Theatre of Europe and its\nDrama a pretty penny. What of that?....\nare we not here today to pay the mortgage ?\nI have the utmost sympathy with those\nwho feel they are too poor to do more than\nadd to this debt, for the next century will have\nto pay. Possibly that is one of the reasons\nwhy so many well-to-do actors nowadays warn\ntheir sons against taking up the profession.\nBut let us return to my print shop.\nThe last time I was in Zenabella I\ndiscovered a book in my print shop. It was\na hovel of a place, and there lay Zola's\n\" Nana \". I bought it; I took it home and\nI read it.\n\nNANA.\n\n\" All Paris Will visit your Theatre \" Say,\nmy brothel, answered the Manager\nI suppose that there are very few people\nliving today who are reading Emile Zola's\nnovel \" Nana \" for the first time : yet I have\nbut just finished reading it and for the first\ntime, although I began it some thirty years\nago and came to a full stop at the passage\nin Chapter One where a manager of a Theatre\nasks a habituee of his playhouse to drop the"}, {"page_pdf": 42, "page_imprimee": "38", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.42", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4286, "texte": "word \" theatre \" and substitute the word\n\" brothel\" (0.\nKnowing dozens of theatres which were\nserious places, (serious as churches, banks, or\nships) I drew the line at any further interest\nfor a book, whose author, I saw, promised to\nkeep up the fantastic old delusion of the out-\nsider.\nThat the theatre this Zola was to write\nof, was no theatre at all, settled it for me that\nI should not be interested. I put the book\ndown.\n€J That I was probably prejudiced only\noccurs to me now. For have not there been\nwriters who made novels out of Banks full of\nThieves, Churches full of Knaves ? The\nworld is full of men and women, and men and\nwomen full of pranks, passions, vices and\nvirtues.\nAre we to read only about virtues and\nthe virtuous ? They exist and are often hidden,\nand so to reveal them with what we call\n\" art * is to do a trick not without beauty.\nBut no virtue is quite valuable surrounded by\na sea ot virtues ; how mark a poor single virtue,\nhow illumine it, if no vices are there to set\noff its brilliance ? Too much virtue may be\nas vile as too much vice.\n* * *\nCI So three days ago when I was in need\nof a book to read .... a novel above all else....\nI happened to pick up a copy of \" Nana\"\non a bookstall. For three francs I bought it,\nand in three days I have read it.\nAnd it is awefull.\nIt deals with the life of a woman who\ngoes on to the stage without any qualifications,\nwithout genius or talent, unable to act, but\npossessed of an astounding personality.... of\nthe personality which attracts.... of animal\nmagnetism.\nThis personality is not the personality of\na Rachel, who also attracted besides having\na genius as a tragic actress; it is not a bril-\nliant personality, it is just a weak one; she\nis amiable, a hundred times amiable, loveable,\nand all over the place.\nBy means of this personality displayed on\nthe stage she brings all Paris to her feet.\nShe lives every kind of life, ....in poor quar-\nters, in gaudy well-to-do ones, in neat ones,\nin sumptuous ones, and finally dies of the\nsmallpox, her face eaten away.\nTo the end, and even beyond it, she\nstill continues to attract.\nThis is not repulsive although it does not\nsound exactly attractive. But there is an un-\nder current which is interesting, more attrac-\ntive, stranger, for those of us who work in\nTheatres and want to see the Theatre of the\nworld taking on a new lease of life. It is a\ntheme which recurs and recurs, and each\ntime it does so it reminds us of paragraphs\nwe read today in the newspapers, or of photo-\ngraphs we have seen only yesterday in the\nshop windows. It is the theme of the Impre-\nsario and the hangers-on to Theatres, ....let\nit be instantly added the tenth-rate ones, these\nflashy gentlemen with their big press agencies\nand their paragraphed expressions of heartfelt\ndesire to uplift the drama, even to make it\nsacred, ....even if they have to sweeten the\npill for the public by serving up the moral\nwith something that tastes good; in short, the\nmost beautiful women that can be found in\nEurope and America.\nWe hear of these funny fellows every day.\nIn \" Nana \" we have their portraits.\nII.\nWHEN some suave theatrical impresario or\ndirector wrote to Nana, ....was she at\nthat time in Berlin or Prague?... saying he\nwanted to see her really a success, that it\nwas his way to work for love could not\ndream of business where she was concerned,\n....that her immense talents were being hid-\nden, that he felt it was part of his life's work\nto bring her to Pariis (or was it New York ?),\nshe naturally ran off to Paris or New York\nas quickly as possible. Yes, it was to Paris\nshe ran. And became a great success ; had\nsome twenty lovers immediately, ....yes, in-\nstantly.... ; took up with a twenty-first, a man\n\n(1) Even today I wince for the Theatre when Zola\nis so appalling rude about it. Yet Ido not find him old-\nfashioned although it is the fashion to call him that. The\nthing which makes him seem so to people of today is that\nthey have not read him. If Congreve be up-to-date it is\nbecause they do read him. Zola is now successfully\ndisposed of after a struggle, and because he added grief\nand pain to his tale he is to be shelved. Had he spangled\nand powdered his heroine at her death and let her laugh\na little more ironicallyv she and he today would be a la\nmode."}, {"page_pdf": 43, "page_imprimee": "39", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.43", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4401, "texte": "of wealth and left the twenty for a month ;\nthen after a few weeks more took the twenty\nback with the twenty first. Then threw them\nall over; disappeared with a hideous looking\nactor ; stayed with him a few months in more\nor less poverty in Montmartre; then sank to\nworse poverty and haunted the cafe of some\nold woman who was always eager to see new\nfaces ; appeared on the stage for two nights,\nand in those two nights managed to win ano-\nther protector, who lavished on her millions\nof francs ; ...♦all this was quite natural. The\nimpresario and the manager, looking holy,\nwere photographed with the lady between them;\nall Paris was impressed, .... just like today.\nAnd our 1924 Theatre is where it was\nin 1870: it is where these impresarios and\nmanagers, with their clever manipulation of\nwomen, would have it.\nIt is devilish clever to be sure. The\nworld gets bitten by a longing to see a sa-\ncred play, ....having heard that the Oberam-\nmergau Passion Play is not to be seen unless\nthe world will travel all the way to Oberam-\nmergau, and then only once in every ten\nyears. So the impresario and the manager\nresolve to make up a substitute to console a\nfretful world. It shall have its sacred play,\n.... but it wont really be so sacred as all\nthat, because we are prudent gentlemen from\nthe East, and know that the 'Western world\n(which, by the way, we despise) only wants\nto have the shadow of sacred things ; if there\nmust be any substance let it be as fleshy as\npossible.\nAnd Nana is again caught in the net....\nand landed ever so gently; put on the mar-\nket ; praised by the modern press agent month\nby month for her dramatic virtues, then each\nwreek, then each day; cables are sent round\nthe world of her amazing talents (and she\nwith but one, ard that the old magnetism\npossessed by myriads of women) ; photographs\nfill the back pages of daily papers; and a\nrich man, also from the East, is found to act\nnobly by supporting the immense expense,\n....so great is his love for art ....and religion,\nespecially the Christian religion. In short the\nwhole thing almost causes the impresario to\nbreak down with emotion so noble he is, she\nis, they all are.\nEvery day and in every land this is being\ndone in Theatres, on a small scale and on a\nlarge scale.\nIf not a \" religious \" play it's a Revue,\nor a Historical play; any old theme serves,\n.... it's the woman is the goods.\nDo you want any examples pointed out\nto you ? There's no need, they are so evident.\nThe small town of Zenabella, in which, I\nwrite this, has given me the details which I\nhave here related.\nPerhaps in New or in Paris or in\nLondon today there are no ludicrous jokes of\nthis sacred art business being perpetrated.\nI leave you to decide that.\nBut here in Zenabella a dark-skinned\nfellow of the name of Moses Bethany came\nand bamboozled the entire province (and the\ntown itself) with his productions of a thing\nhe called \" A Miraculous Play \", in which\nthere was nothing sacred at all. But hew he\nfooled them ! ! !\nSo do read \" Nana it tells you how\nit is done so much better than I can.\n€jj A strange and sad point made by\nZola is the amazing infidelity of his Heroine :\nhe is always returning and returning to this.\nOf her amours I do not speak; I refer to the\ninfidelity of her mind. And she and most\nof her fellow-actresses are adepts at abusing\neveryone with their tongues. Yet Madame\nBerton's pretty book had not then appea-\nred (1).\nThere is hardly one, favoured or not fa-\nvoured, whom these ladies do not abuse like\npickpockets. It is a curious point; ..S.is it true\nto life ?\nHave actresses such utterly unfaithful minds,\nso little control over their tongues? Do they\nreally slander to the extent Zola makes out ?\nIf so, is it due to the constant changing of\ntheir very nature each night, due to their pro-\nfession which forces them to this capacious\nversatility ? Is it due to this profession that\nthey come to behave like nothing real, and\nsee all real life and living beings as false life\nand false beings,as they open a door on the\nstage and go on into an unreal existence ? I\nthink it is; and so possibly they may be\nexempt from the blame due to others, for they\nhave no sense left of realities.\nIf this be true, then, if they lied they\nwould lie like truth, making the very truth\nseem falsehood to it\" : this goes without saying.\nOne is not an actress, 1 suppose, for nothing.\n\n(I) Vide Mask. Vol, X. Page 135."}, {"page_pdf": 44, "page_imprimee": "40", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.44", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1185, "texte": "And yet so many of these great ladies in the\nParis story are dancers, singers, chorus-girls ;\nall blended together, as in life, I suppose;\njournalists, singers, bankers, painters and girls ;\nan odd crew.... and all so real.\nOne wonders, is the whole book a libel,\nor is it true ?... or is it mezzo e mezzo.\nIII.\nNOW it begins to look as though these few\nnotes on the Pretty Theatre were soon\nto develope into the Ugly Theatre.\nBut 'tis no such thing. The prettiness is\nthere, and under it what is under all else.\nWe shall soon come to pretty Mile. Gui-\nmard, her mother, Mr Leger and the Mar-\nquis de Soubise. And Fragonard will step\ninto the room ... or rather into that little pri-\nvate Theatre of hers ; and Fragonard is a\nguarantee for the perfection of prettiness.\nA few measurements of her theatre, a\nfew dates as to when the place was put\nup ....and put up for auction.... cannot de-\ntract greatly from the charm; dates are in\nany case valuable as a basis for Terpsicore\nto pirouette on.... and even to die on,... for-\ngotten.\nPoor Terpsichore, one of \" le ballerine \"\nwho dominated nGt only the realms of the\nstage but also those of \"la Galanterie \".\nTo be continued.\n\nX. Y. Z."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c040", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c040", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "37", "page_fin": "37", "image_debut": 41, "image_fin": 41, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.7.1", "titre_corps": "PART TWO", "titre_sommaire": "PART TWO", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 41, "page_imprimee": "37", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.41", "debut_caractere": 20, "fin_caractere_exclue": 3629, "texte": "PART TWO\nAS I said in my opening notes on this\ntheme, I do not intend to be critical. My\npurpose is more that of the print-collector\nthan of the writer.\nHave you not seen this print-collector in\nsome old shop, in Rue de la Seine or Rue\ndes Beaux Arts, as he sits by the hour\nturning over hundreds of prints of all subjects\nand of all centuries.... silent.... pausing to\nlook at some, turning over others without more\nthan a glance, picking out with deliberation,\nbut without a word said, one here, one\nthere ; laying them in a heap. Then, after a\ngood three hours' search, silently paying for\nthese, ....going home.... undoing his package....\ngoing more slowly over each print.... saying\nnothing.\nMy purpose is his: he thinks a devil of\na lot, may be ; but whatever he thinks it is\nhis delight in the print as a print, including\nsubject, condition of the print, name of en-\ngraver, date, quality of the work and price.\nAnd so is it here with me. If some are\ncensorious, when they hear of Mile. Guimard,\nSophie Arnould and Madame Montansier, to\nselect three of the most remarkable names\nfrom a big bouquet, .... if some find the private\ntheatres of the first two ladies mere hot-beds\nof vice and the many public theatres ruled\nover by the third dens of infamy, I have come\nto look on them as the old print collector looks\nupon his treasures. They have cost me very\nlittle, and have given me great pleasure:\nI have read so much about them, seen the\nhouses they made and seen them recorded again;\n1 have seen them die : even come to forget\nthem in the centuries which followed: remem-\nbered them again while contemplating subse-\nquent centuries : see them again now. I for\none cannot pick one of them out for censure.\nBut I muse at times: La Guimard is\nworth the threepence I gave for her: Sophie\nat a golden guinea was not dear: Madame\nMontansier .... I would any day give again\nthe shilling I was asked for her and without\na murmur.\nIf the price is sometimes low, what of that:\nI gave what the print-seller asked. For a song\nby Mozart there is no price, ....so rare that\nfew can hear it, so cheap that anyone may\nhave it: for a glance at the Palazzo Ducale\nin Genova nothing is asked ; you may even\npass it for nothing and not see it. So that\nit seems that the price of a thing is nothing\nby which to guage the value : \" nothing for\nnothing and dam little for sixpence \" sounds\npretty so far as it goes, but the sound is its\nprincipal asset. There is not truth there.\nYou sometimes can get all for nothing and\nsometimes for a thousand pounds nothing.\nThe pretty is often held to be so cheap\nthat it is not worth any notice at all; and\nassuredly a little of it can be afforded by any\nof us and is useful to all. It is useless to\ndeny that. \"Whether in certain centuries it\nwas worth quite so much as the price put on\nit is another matter. I cannot tell; ....I leave\nit to the Due d'Orleans and the Prince d'Henin\nto settle that between them.... if they ever\nmeet nowadays.\nThe pretty, spite of it being so cheap,\npossibly cost the Theatre of Europe and its\nDrama a pretty penny. What of that?....\nare we not here today to pay the mortgage ?\nI have the utmost sympathy with those\nwho feel they are too poor to do more than\nadd to this debt, for the next century will have\nto pay. Possibly that is one of the reasons\nwhy so many well-to-do actors nowadays warn\ntheir sons against taking up the profession.\nBut let us return to my print shop.\nThe last time I was in Zenabella I\ndiscovered a book in my print shop. It was\na hovel of a place, and there lay Zola's\n\" Nana \". I bought it; I took it home and\nI read it."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c041", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c041", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "37", "page_fin": "40", "image_debut": 41, "image_fin": 44, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.7.2", "titre_corps": "NANA", "titre_sommaire": "NANA", "signature_source": "X. Y. Z", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 41, "page_imprimee": "37", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.41", "debut_caractere": 3631, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4066, "texte": "NANA.\n\n\" All Paris Will visit your Theatre \" Say,\nmy brothel, answered the Manager\nI suppose that there are very few people\nliving today who are reading Emile Zola's\nnovel \" Nana \" for the first time : yet I have\nbut just finished reading it and for the first\ntime, although I began it some thirty years\nago and came to a full stop at the passage\nin Chapter One where a manager of a Theatre\nasks a habituee of his playhouse to drop the"}, {"page_pdf": 42, "page_imprimee": "38", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.42", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4286, "texte": "word \" theatre \" and substitute the word\n\" brothel\" (0.\nKnowing dozens of theatres which were\nserious places, (serious as churches, banks, or\nships) I drew the line at any further interest\nfor a book, whose author, I saw, promised to\nkeep up the fantastic old delusion of the out-\nsider.\nThat the theatre this Zola was to write\nof, was no theatre at all, settled it for me that\nI should not be interested. I put the book\ndown.\n€J That I was probably prejudiced only\noccurs to me now. For have not there been\nwriters who made novels out of Banks full of\nThieves, Churches full of Knaves ? The\nworld is full of men and women, and men and\nwomen full of pranks, passions, vices and\nvirtues.\nAre we to read only about virtues and\nthe virtuous ? They exist and are often hidden,\nand so to reveal them with what we call\n\" art * is to do a trick not without beauty.\nBut no virtue is quite valuable surrounded by\na sea ot virtues ; how mark a poor single virtue,\nhow illumine it, if no vices are there to set\noff its brilliance ? Too much virtue may be\nas vile as too much vice.\n* * *\nCI So three days ago when I was in need\nof a book to read .... a novel above all else....\nI happened to pick up a copy of \" Nana\"\non a bookstall. For three francs I bought it,\nand in three days I have read it.\nAnd it is awefull.\nIt deals with the life of a woman who\ngoes on to the stage without any qualifications,\nwithout genius or talent, unable to act, but\npossessed of an astounding personality.... of\nthe personality which attracts.... of animal\nmagnetism.\nThis personality is not the personality of\na Rachel, who also attracted besides having\na genius as a tragic actress; it is not a bril-\nliant personality, it is just a weak one; she\nis amiable, a hundred times amiable, loveable,\nand all over the place.\nBy means of this personality displayed on\nthe stage she brings all Paris to her feet.\nShe lives every kind of life, ....in poor quar-\nters, in gaudy well-to-do ones, in neat ones,\nin sumptuous ones, and finally dies of the\nsmallpox, her face eaten away.\nTo the end, and even beyond it, she\nstill continues to attract.\nThis is not repulsive although it does not\nsound exactly attractive. But there is an un-\nder current which is interesting, more attrac-\ntive, stranger, for those of us who work in\nTheatres and want to see the Theatre of the\nworld taking on a new lease of life. It is a\ntheme which recurs and recurs, and each\ntime it does so it reminds us of paragraphs\nwe read today in the newspapers, or of photo-\ngraphs we have seen only yesterday in the\nshop windows. It is the theme of the Impre-\nsario and the hangers-on to Theatres, ....let\nit be instantly added the tenth-rate ones, these\nflashy gentlemen with their big press agencies\nand their paragraphed expressions of heartfelt\ndesire to uplift the drama, even to make it\nsacred, ....even if they have to sweeten the\npill for the public by serving up the moral\nwith something that tastes good; in short, the\nmost beautiful women that can be found in\nEurope and America.\nWe hear of these funny fellows every day.\nIn \" Nana \" we have their portraits.\nII.\nWHEN some suave theatrical impresario or\ndirector wrote to Nana, ....was she at\nthat time in Berlin or Prague?... saying he\nwanted to see her really a success, that it\nwas his way to work for love could not\ndream of business where she was concerned,\n....that her immense talents were being hid-\nden, that he felt it was part of his life's work\nto bring her to Pariis (or was it New York ?),\nshe naturally ran off to Paris or New York\nas quickly as possible. Yes, it was to Paris\nshe ran. And became a great success ; had\nsome twenty lovers immediately, ....yes, in-\nstantly.... ; took up with a twenty-first, a man\n\n(1) Even today I wince for the Theatre when Zola\nis so appalling rude about it. Yet Ido not find him old-\nfashioned although it is the fashion to call him that. The\nthing which makes him seem so to people of today is that\nthey have not read him. If Congreve be up-to-date it is\nbecause they do read him. Zola is now successfully\ndisposed of after a struggle, and because he added grief\nand pain to his tale he is to be shelved. Had he spangled\nand powdered his heroine at her death and let her laugh\na little more ironicallyv she and he today would be a la\nmode."}, {"page_pdf": 43, "page_imprimee": "39", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.43", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4401, "texte": "of wealth and left the twenty for a month ;\nthen after a few weeks more took the twenty\nback with the twenty first. Then threw them\nall over; disappeared with a hideous looking\nactor ; stayed with him a few months in more\nor less poverty in Montmartre; then sank to\nworse poverty and haunted the cafe of some\nold woman who was always eager to see new\nfaces ; appeared on the stage for two nights,\nand in those two nights managed to win ano-\nther protector, who lavished on her millions\nof francs ; ...♦all this was quite natural. The\nimpresario and the manager, looking holy,\nwere photographed with the lady between them;\nall Paris was impressed, .... just like today.\nAnd our 1924 Theatre is where it was\nin 1870: it is where these impresarios and\nmanagers, with their clever manipulation of\nwomen, would have it.\nIt is devilish clever to be sure. The\nworld gets bitten by a longing to see a sa-\ncred play, ....having heard that the Oberam-\nmergau Passion Play is not to be seen unless\nthe world will travel all the way to Oberam-\nmergau, and then only once in every ten\nyears. So the impresario and the manager\nresolve to make up a substitute to console a\nfretful world. It shall have its sacred play,\n.... but it wont really be so sacred as all\nthat, because we are prudent gentlemen from\nthe East, and know that the 'Western world\n(which, by the way, we despise) only wants\nto have the shadow of sacred things ; if there\nmust be any substance let it be as fleshy as\npossible.\nAnd Nana is again caught in the net....\nand landed ever so gently; put on the mar-\nket ; praised by the modern press agent month\nby month for her dramatic virtues, then each\nwreek, then each day; cables are sent round\nthe world of her amazing talents (and she\nwith but one, ard that the old magnetism\npossessed by myriads of women) ; photographs\nfill the back pages of daily papers; and a\nrich man, also from the East, is found to act\nnobly by supporting the immense expense,\n....so great is his love for art ....and religion,\nespecially the Christian religion. In short the\nwhole thing almost causes the impresario to\nbreak down with emotion so noble he is, she\nis, they all are.\nEvery day and in every land this is being\ndone in Theatres, on a small scale and on a\nlarge scale.\nIf not a \" religious \" play it's a Revue,\nor a Historical play; any old theme serves,\n.... it's the woman is the goods.\nDo you want any examples pointed out\nto you ? There's no need, they are so evident.\nThe small town of Zenabella, in which, I\nwrite this, has given me the details which I\nhave here related.\nPerhaps in New or in Paris or in\nLondon today there are no ludicrous jokes of\nthis sacred art business being perpetrated.\nI leave you to decide that.\nBut here in Zenabella a dark-skinned\nfellow of the name of Moses Bethany came\nand bamboozled the entire province (and the\ntown itself) with his productions of a thing\nhe called \" A Miraculous Play \", in which\nthere was nothing sacred at all. But hew he\nfooled them ! ! !\nSo do read \" Nana it tells you how\nit is done so much better than I can.\n€jj A strange and sad point made by\nZola is the amazing infidelity of his Heroine :\nhe is always returning and returning to this.\nOf her amours I do not speak; I refer to the\ninfidelity of her mind. And she and most\nof her fellow-actresses are adepts at abusing\neveryone with their tongues. Yet Madame\nBerton's pretty book had not then appea-\nred (1).\nThere is hardly one, favoured or not fa-\nvoured, whom these ladies do not abuse like\npickpockets. It is a curious point; ..S.is it true\nto life ?\nHave actresses such utterly unfaithful minds,\nso little control over their tongues? Do they\nreally slander to the extent Zola makes out ?\nIf so, is it due to the constant changing of\ntheir very nature each night, due to their pro-\nfession which forces them to this capacious\nversatility ? Is it due to this profession that\nthey come to behave like nothing real, and\nsee all real life and living beings as false life\nand false beings,as they open a door on the\nstage and go on into an unreal existence ? I\nthink it is; and so possibly they may be\nexempt from the blame due to others, for they\nhave no sense left of realities.\nIf this be true, then, if they lied they\nwould lie like truth, making the very truth\nseem falsehood to it\" : this goes without saying.\nOne is not an actress, 1 suppose, for nothing.\n\n(I) Vide Mask. Vol, X. Page 135."}, {"page_pdf": 44, "page_imprimee": "40", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.44", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1185, "texte": "And yet so many of these great ladies in the\nParis story are dancers, singers, chorus-girls ;\nall blended together, as in life, I suppose;\njournalists, singers, bankers, painters and girls ;\nan odd crew.... and all so real.\nOne wonders, is the whole book a libel,\nor is it true ?... or is it mezzo e mezzo.\nIII.\nNOW it begins to look as though these few\nnotes on the Pretty Theatre were soon\nto develope into the Ugly Theatre.\nBut 'tis no such thing. The prettiness is\nthere, and under it what is under all else.\nWe shall soon come to pretty Mile. Gui-\nmard, her mother, Mr Leger and the Mar-\nquis de Soubise. And Fragonard will step\ninto the room ... or rather into that little pri-\nvate Theatre of hers ; and Fragonard is a\nguarantee for the perfection of prettiness.\nA few measurements of her theatre, a\nfew dates as to when the place was put\nup ....and put up for auction.... cannot de-\ntract greatly from the charm; dates are in\nany case valuable as a basis for Terpsicore\nto pirouette on.... and even to die on,... for-\ngotten.\nPoor Terpsichore, one of \" le ballerine \"\nwho dominated nGt only the realms of the\nstage but also those of \"la Galanterie \".\nTo be continued.\n\nX. Y. Z."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c043", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c043", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "40", "page_fin": "42", "image_debut": 44, "image_fin": 46, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.8", "titre_corps": "IMITATION : A NOTE BY JAN KLAASSEN WITH STORY BY A. DUMAS PERE", "titre_sommaire": "IMITATION : A NOTE BY JAN KLAASSEN WITH STORY BY A. DUMAS PERE", "signature_source": "JAN KLAASSEN", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 44, "page_imprimee": "40", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.44", "debut_caractere": 1187, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4605, "texte": "IMITATION.\nA NOTE\nBY JAN KLAASSEN\nWITH STORY BY A. DUMAS PERE.\nIMITATING to perfection is certainly a talent,\nand it is this special talent which is pos-\nsessed by the Russians. They derive it from\nthe far East.\nAnd in the Russian Theatre this talent has\nbeen so cleverly employed that it has tho-\nroughly dazzled Europeans and Americans.\nWith the Russians imitation really be-\ncomes almost masterly.\nIn defence of this it is often with justice\nadvanced that Russians are not the only imi-\ntators : that even Italy was glad to derive from\nthe East, and that her Architecture, Painting,\nhouse decoration and all is directly inspired\nby the East. Nay, more, Eastern artists came\nto Italy at a moment when the arts were in a\nsad plight, and helped the Italians to recover\nthemselves.\nBut that is quite another matter, and the art\nof the Italian architects, sculptors, and painters,\nthough derived from Greece or Byzantium\nin the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, (0 is a\nrather greater feat than the making of a wig\nwhich, when worn, is to be taken for growing\nhair.\nTo derive from another nation is not to\nimitate slavishly. The Italians have derived,\nbut have not the requisite nature or knack for\nimitating. The Russians assuredly have both\nthis nature and the knack.\nRussia's far-famed Ballet is the fruit of\nthis slick talent, and the other forms of Dra-\nmatic art are thought out and executed by men\nwho possess immense powers of mimicry.\nBy this I do not mean that they take ideas\nfrom Antoine or from Reinhardt: I mean that\nthey take a drama to pieces, find models of\neach piece in life, and then with astounding\npatience, make facsimiles so that you can hardly\ntell the difference from the originals.\nPersonally I find this very attractive, just\nas I found the Queen's Dolls' House attractive.\nIt seemed to me to be a real Palace in mi-\nniature.... all was there.... only a small Pri-\nvate Theatre was lacking.\n\n(/) Those interested in this subject can trace it out in\ninnumerable works on Italian art. The following are a few\nlines taken here and there from the \" Renaissance in Italy\n{Fine Aids) \" by J. A, Symonds, referring to the Oriental and\nGrczco-Roman influences felt by the early masters of archi-\ntecturey painting and sculpture, such as Cimabue, Niccola Pi-\nsano, and other thirteenth century artists.\n41 The Tuscans never forgot the domes of their remote\nancestors; the Romans adhered closely to Latin traditions;\nthe Southerners were affected by Byzantine and Saracenic\nmodels\ntl The intercourse of Venice with Alexandria determined\nthe unique architecture of S. Mark's. The Arabs and Nor-\nmans left ineffaceable traces of their sojourn on Palermo.\n....All along the coasts we here and there find evidences of\nOriental style imported into mediaeval Italy....\n\" Existing thus in the midst of many potent influences, and\nsurrounded by the ruins of past civilisation, the Italians re-\ncombined and mingled styles of marked variety. The Roman,\nByzantine, Saracenic, Lombard, and German traditions were\nblended in their architecture, as the presiding genius of each\nplace determined.\n41 In the Campo Santo at Pisa may still be seen a sarcho-\nphagus representing the story of Hippolytus and Phcsdra....\nStudying the heroic nudities and noble attitudes of this bas-\nrelief Niccola {Pisano) rediscover ed the right way of art—\nnot by merely copying his model, but by divining the secret of\nthe grand style."}, {"page_pdf": 45, "page_imprimee": "41", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.45", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4303, "texte": "I admit that mimicry may possibly have\nno relation whatever with art: anyhow it in-\ntrigues me.\nAs an illustration of this colossal power of\nmimicry I think the following tale by Alexandre\nDumas pere will please.\nDumas visits a private Collection in a small\ntown of Southern France belonging to\nM. Grassei: —\n\" I confess that I expected to see one of\nthose poor collections to be met with in pro-\nvincial towns, with three or four stuffed fish\nhanging from the ceiling; but I was agreably\nsurprised to find in the very first room some\nmagnificent vases by Bernard de Palissy, and\na complete collection of stones and minerals\nfrom Mount Sinai,—a collection which, pro-\nbably, could not be found in the Paris Mu-\nseum of Natural History. Unfortunately I was\nnot sufficiently learned in minerology to appre-\nciate it properly : I accordingly turned to a\nquantity of objects of the middle ages, and\nabove all to some locks and keys, which\nwere carved with a taste and skill that would\nhave done honour to Benvenuto Cellini.\nIn this manner we passed successively\nthrough four or five rooms, filled with cu-\nrious objects, the majority of which had been\nprocured for M. Grasset by one of his friends,\na learned and brave sea-captain, who had\nsailed round the world I don't know how\nmany times, and who had arrived back from\nChina about a fortnight or three weeks pre-\nviously, bringing with him a most singular\nexample, not of the intellect, but of .the pa-\ntience, of the worshippers of the Great Dragon.\nAmongst the different pairs of trousers\nwhich the captain had had made for him be-\nfore leaving Paris there was one which was\nconsidered a master-piece: it was one of those\nmiracles which sometimes issue from the esta-\nblishments of Vaudeau or Poole, and which\nenvelop the boots, indicate the calf, abolish\nthe knee, mark the thigh, and deny the exis-\ntence of corporation. Accordingly, thanks to\nthe predilection entertained for them by their\nowner, the trousers, after having flourished\nalong the coast, at the Cape of Good Hope\nand the Isle of France, arrived at Canton,\nnearly worn out. Nevertheless, owing to that\nfashionable cut of which nothing, not even the\nfact of being new, can supply the place, they\nstill looked very well, when the Sailor, who\nserved as the captain's valet, spilled half the\noil contained in af lamp which he was clea-\nning, on the very middle of the thigh of the\nunfortunate pair.\nThis blow, in spite of his philosophy, had\nsuch an effect upon the captain, that he had\nnot quite recovered from it when one of his\nCanton associates came as usual to smoke a\npipe of opium with him. He found him in\nsuch a state of vexation that he feared some\ngreat misfortune must have befallen him, and\naccordingly enquired what had occurred to\nalter his habitual good humour. The captain\nshowed him the unfortunate trousers, which he\nhad now thrown aside : — \" There ! \" said\nhe, \"just look ! The very pair you were com-\nplimenting me on yesterday ! \".\nThe friend took the trousers, and turned\nthem about with the most provoking calm.\nWhen he was quite convinced that they could\nhot be worn again, he observed : —\n\" Well, you must have another pair made \".\n\" Another pair made! \" retorted the ca-\nptain, \" And who's to make another pair,\n.... some of your Chinese fellows ? \".\n\" Certainly, some of my Chinese fellows! \"\nreturned the friend with imperturbable coolness.\n\" Yes, and get a sack sent to me, made\nin their regular style! \" continued the captain,\nshrugging his shoulders.\n\" They won't make you a sack \", said the\nother,\" and, if you only supply them the model\nupon which you want them made, they will\nturn you out a pair of trousers that Vaudeau\nwouldn't know from his own \".\n\" Really ? \", said the captain.\n\" Upon my honour \", assured the friend.\n\" Weil, I have heard hundreds of times of\nthe fidelity of the Chinese in imitation \".\n\" And what you have heard upon the\nsubject has been less than the truth \".\n\" By heaven, you make me anxious to try\nthem\n\" Do try, especially as it won't cost you\nmuch. How much did you pay for those\ntrousers ?\n\" Fifty-five or sixty francs, I don't quite\nremember \".\n\"Well, you can see what they're capable\nof doing here for fifteen \".\n\" And what tailor must I take them to ? \".\n\" The first you come to. Mine if you like,\nhe lives at the gate \"."}, {"page_pdf": 46, "page_imprimee": "42", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.46", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 3898, "texte": "The captain takes his trousers under his arm,\nfollows his friend, and arrives at the tailor's.\n\" Now \", said the friend, \" explain what\nycu want, and I will translate your words\nto him \".\nThe captain did not need to be told twice,\nand, spreading out the trousers, he pointed\nout their cut, and ended by saying that he\nwanted a pair exactly like them. The friend\ntranslated the order, and laid great stress on\nthe directions.\n\" Very well \", said the tailor, \" in three\ndays the gentleman shall have what he wants\".\n\" What does he say? \" asked the captain\nimpatiently.\n\"He says you shall have them in three\ndays \".\n\" Three days ! That's a long time \", says\nthe captain.\nThe friend translated the captain's remark\nto the Chinese, who looked at the trousers\nagain, shook his head, and said a few words\nin reply to the interpreter.\n\"Well?\" asked the captain.\n\" He says there's a great deal of work\nto do and that three days are not too long\nin order to have it done properly \".\n\" Well, three days then: but don't let him\nbreak his word \".\nAnd the two friends went away, repeating\ntheir directions to the craftsman for the last time,\nThree days afterwards, as the captain and\nhis friend were smoking their pipe of opium,\nthe servant opened the door, and announced\nthe tailor.\n\"Oh ho\", said the captain; \"Well, let\nus see if he is as skilful as he is punctual\".\n\" There they are \" said the tailor.\n\" Let's try them \", said the captain as he\ntook the trousers from the hands of the tailor,\nput them on, and, in order to be certain that\nthey fitted well, told the tailor to draw up the\nblinds.\n\" Why, they fit wonderfully\", said the\nfriend.\n\"I should think so\" said the captain:\n\" he has given me my old pair. But where\nare the others, you stupid ? \" he exclaimed to\nthe Chinese.\nThe friend translated the remark to the\ntailor, who gave the other pair with a trium-\nphant look.\nThe captain changed the trousers.\n\"Well, I must be mad \" said he. \" This\npair now seems to be mine. Where can the\nnew ones be ?\nThe friend expressed the captain's doubts\nto the tailor, who held out the trousers upon\nwhich he had just finished working.\n\"Well, here is the new pair\" said thefriend.\n\"No, can't you see they are the old\nones ? \" replied the captain. \" Why hang it,\nthere's the spot of grease ! \".\n\" And there's one on the pair you have\n°n What' fool's wit can this be?\"\n\" The friend turned to the Chinese, que-\nstioned him, and, upon hearing his reply,\nburst into a shout of laughter \".\n\"Well?\" said the captain.\n\" Well \", said the friend, \" What did you\norder from this good man \" ?\n\" I ordered a pair of trousers \".\n\" Like your own \".\n\" Yes, like my own\n\"Well, he has made them so like that\nyou can't tell the difference that's all. But\nhe tells me that his greatest trouble has been\nto wear them out, and spot them in exactly\nthe same places ; and that he must charge you\nfive francs extra, because he failed with two\npairs before coming to a satisfactory result;\nnow, however, he defies you to distinguish\none pair from the other. You must allow\nthat that's well worth twenty francs \".\n\" Indeed it is \", replied the captain, as\nhe drew a Napoleon from his pocket and gave\nit to the Chinese,\nThe Chinese thanked him, and asked for\nthe Captain's custom so long as he remained\nin Canton, although, he added, if he always\nhad such difficult work given him, there would\nbe no profit on it.\nFrom that day the captain could never tell\none pair of trousers from the other, so much\nalike were they. He brought them both back\nto France as specimens of Chinese industry,\nand had promised to make a present of them\nto M. Grasset. If he kept his word, they\nmust be far from being the least interesting\nthings in the collection.\nMOSCOW and Leningrad are midway\" on\nthe road from Paris to China. The\ntrousers may be Parisian, but the trick is\nOriental; and the net result, as someone has\nremarked, the synthetic Orient Express."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c044", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c044", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "43", "page_fin": "44", "image_debut": 47, "image_fin": 48, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.9", "titre_corps": "\"THE SACKBUT\" AND THE NEED FOR MUSIC", "titre_sommaire": "\"THE SACKBUT\" AND THE NEED FOR MUSIC", "signature_source": "GORDON CRAIG", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 47, "page_imprimee": "43", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.47", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6730, "texte": "\"THE SACKBUT\" AND\nTHE NEED FOR MUSIC.\nBY GORDON CRAIG.\nWHENEVER I see \" The Sackbut \", that Musical\nReview with a gay cover which appears every month,\nand costs but one shilling, and is altogether quite an achieve-\nment, I am always delighted. The production is due to the\nenergy of Miss Ursula Greville, her managing Editor,\nand her Committee, which includes, amongst others, P. G.\nKonody and Granville Bantock.\nIt contains excellent historical articles on Lully, Rossini,\nJohn Braham, and other articles by modern writers, ....by\nKalisch and Gatti on Strauss and Malipiero, it is a most\nreadable shillingsworth, and its publishers are J. Curwen and\nSons Ltd.\nI would suggest that the need for music is positive, and\nthat if something can be done to bring it to U3 rather more\noften something should be done.\nI am today well fitted to say a word for the first time\nabout the need for music, for, though I am only an artist,\nand ignorant of the history of music, and quite unaware\nwho really is who in the modern stream, I am one who\nonce made a daily use of music; I mean i fed on it.\nAnd when I can no longer hear it I fear to grow thin\nat heart; and if it does not come to me I cannot hear it;\n....and so I starve, for seldom does it come.\nBut I have been hearing it for the last six days. I hear\nit from four in the afternoon until long past midnight. And\nthen I hear it once more in the morning from ten to eleven.\nWill you know where I am and what it is I hear ?\nI am in a big town in the north of Italy, having come\nhere to see and study an old and celebrated Theatre.\nI lodge in a top-but-one-floor room of a hotel which\nlooks on to a very untidy courtyard ; and the courtyard is\nfull of hangings and cries and thuds and knockings. The\nfar-off hum of wheels and motor horns is soothing to my\near, which finds the slamming of shutters, the beating of\ncarpets, the howls of servants, ringing of big electric bells,\nand crackling of cutlery and china, something to meet with\nfortitude.\nSo much for the noise.\nBut, as I said, this noise gives way to music at four\no'clock, No noise could stand up against such music. I rather\nlike it; it has the common touch which Mr. Kipling tells\nus we should try never to lose. Ido not believe 1 shall\nlose it; but, spite of Mr. Kipling, to say truly I sometimes\nwish 1 could. And my wish is in a measure granted, for\nI lose it in the morning as I will tell you later.\nThis music, from four o'clock to past midnight, which\nsweeps the courtyard of all its hideous noises, breaks threa-\nteningly outside my window in a great splash, and 1 feel\nin danger. I mean it quite seriously but without offence ;\nI am threatened by the breakers of modern Jazz music.\nTo this Jazz, millions of people dance each afternoon and\nevery night when bored by the dull old fashioned tinkle\nat the Cinema. (It is, I hear, now acknowledged that folk\nonly go to a cinema for the sake of the music).\nThe first time it attacked me I stood and listened to it\nwith attention for full ten minutes. Perhaps this show of\nrespect for it appeased and propitiated its far-off god and\nwon for me the favour of its own African particular; for\nwhen I sat down to listen to it without impatience for the\nnext thirty minutes I found it bearable.\nI concluded that I could stay without doubt where I was;\nneed not move to another hotel as for a moment 1 had\nfelt I should have to do ; and that 1 could do my work,\nwhich, whatever it be, I always enjoy doing, and in more\nor less any reasonable surroundings.\nSo I tried to work. 1 got on quite well; though 1\nadmit I was feeling quite ill.\nFor eight days I felt quite ill every time I heard that\nmusic, but now I hive grown to rather like it. At first\nI believed that I was out of touch with it, because I was\nnot down there and in it; and dancing hellishly in the flames\nwith some deadly serious modern lady who is not such a\nfool as to ask why she does anything but just does it.\nWell, I don't always like to be outdone by the great,\nso every afternoon from four to eight and from ten to\ntwelve I will work on through this steaming noise, (which\n1 am beginning to like) this landing-stage chatter, and ask\nno questions.\nBut its morning now, and up above me a player, I\nthink a careful lady-player, has just ended an hour s\npractice. She has the uncommon touch. Of all tunes to\nhear coming down to me from on high, one of Chopin's\nslighter and loveliest things was the most unexpected. ..\nand the sun seemed to break through the ceiling.\ni have heard this piece of music some hundred times ;\nbut not since 1937 have I chanced to hear it.\nThat is a long time to be without something on which\none feeds, and I mention it because it is a serious matter,\nthis starving of the heart.\nI cannot engage a private orchestra, and I cannot go\nout to hear music. Very often there is none to go out\nto hear, i have to work, and regularly. I daresay I could\nwork less regularly.\nSo as I cannot hear music in my home by the sea, near\nGenova, or go out to hear it, perhaps I ought to stay in this\ntop-but-one floor room for the rest of my life since I have\nagain found music, ....and ask no questions as to its quality.\nI ought to embrace the full ignorance of the shattering\nstrains and move to its blood and thunier rhythm which\nis not without decision; allow my new work to be colou-\nred by its blood and strengthened by its thundering, its\nclanging and tumbling form; for there seems a chance that\nin the morning the dear lady upstairs may be practising her\nbit over and over again. These seventeen years I have been\nmore or less without all music, and that is, I submit, to\nbe without a very needful thing.\nIf when 1am at home a man with a dancing bear\nchances to comes down the road 1 go to the window and\nwatch and listen ;orif an organ passes and, playing as it\npasses, passes away, I go on with my work thoroughly\ndisturbed, but thoroughly ....and well disturbed as I follow\nit to the last far off note. All that was difficult becomes\nas easy as laughing then; all that was problematical is\nsolved. Wasn't that music; and isn't that where music\nis so magical. And mustn't music come and go like that,\n....sometimes lingering a while longer, causing us to throw\ndown the spade or the pen, to stop measuring, and to stand\nstill and silent in our room or our field ?\nIs not that music ?\nIf it be, when may we expect to be favoured with a\nlittle ?\nIs Music perhaps a national thing?... if so, then of\ncourse each nation will see that it is put in its right place....\nthat it waits its turn. First the tram service, next the matter\nof drainage, and then that bothersome music.\nBut if music is not a National thing, if it is so good,\nso easy, so harmless that individuals can deal with it, let"}, {"page_pdf": 48, "page_imprimee": "44", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.48", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 5963, "texte": "them. 1 mean bring it alive again, and bring it in the right\nway and the easiest way to everyone who needs it.\nHow ? There must be ten thousand ways besides the\n44 Merrie England \" way. I suggest that the ordinary way\nmight be discovered.\n* The organs and the bears and the traffic meantime\nremain to cheer us, three or fcur times a year; until, with\nhearts once more whole again, musicians ccme pouring back\nto our cities, and we hear many dozens of old tunes\nagain—as I hear one of mine now on the floor above me.\nThe positive need for music has not, 1 think, just yet\nbeen made clear to those people who have the control of\nmost things in the world, and who, by a little thought,\ncould bring music again into our daily existence.\nThere is Mr. Otto Kahn ; there was Sir Ernest Speyer;\nthey both gave large sums of money I am told to secure\nmusic a hearing in London and New York. There was\nthe Comtesse Greffuhle in Paris; there is Contessa Picco-\nlomini in Roma. These lovers of music have done a little\n—all they could do—and yet music does not reach me\nor you or our neighbours.\nThere is Lord Berners ; there is Vaughan Williams and\nGoossens, and there is Martin Shaw in London. Shaw is\nassuredly trying to get music to those who need it; and\npossibly others are doing something. But as well attempt\nto send coals from Newcastle in a handbag as leave the\ndistribution of music to the unaided efforts of the men who\nare making it.\nIt's a life's work to create any little tune anyhow;\nand then to spread it far and wide, that takes a whole life;\nand Kahn, Speyer, Morgan and Ford cannot give up their\nbanking and motor businesses to devote their full time and\nstrength to the spreading of music far and wide.\nIf they could, it is just such energies who could do\nthis task ; ....no lesser effort by lesser men can do it.\nIt's folly to fail about music, and failure has been\nachieved if we are only to get it by going to a theatre for\nit—or to a concert.\nMusic means health ; it means light; it means all which\na world today unable to afford most things ciies out for\ntoday and is refused.\nI am no prophet, but, had I a prophesying gift, I think\nI would risk a safe word about music.\nI would say that if you can bring music into the streets\ninto courtyards, into museums, into railway stations, into*\nevery place where crowds go and pass from, you can again\nand again rout scepticism, drunkenness and ill health. You\ncan get a long way towards solving half your troublesome\nmodern problems.\nBut you must do it cunningly, with great art.\nI will give you two examples, one bad, one good.\nMusic was introduced into a Museum one or two years\nago. I think it was in London at one of the South\nKensington Museums.\nHow was it introduced into this place of wandering\npassages and courtyards gemmed with delicious things to\nlook at and to stud}', before which hundreds pass along daily,\nlooking at them, and hundreds of others sit studying them ?\nThis is what happened. A closed room was put aside\nfor the music. Caspita I a closed room for this fairy, for\nthis thing born with wings which are even now not crushed.\nAnyone in the museum who happened to find cut that\nmusic could be heard there could go away from the silver\ncaskets, leave the golden frames and the tapestries and\nhear G concert!\nIncredible to me is such an innocence of the true nature\nof music *\nIs anything mere unpractical, when a world is sick for\nlack of a little first-aid, than the notice 44 First aid can be\nobtained by applying for a ticket (Price one shilling) and\nby going in search of the aid\nFirst aid has to be brought to the sick for the sick\ncannot even crawl to where it sits, if it squats in state for\nthe sake o an exaggerated good form.\nMy second example illustrates this.\nOutside and below my house by the sea winds a long\nuphill road. One day last year three men came along this\nroad. They were Russians or Poles or some kind of\nforeigners, and they carried an instrument apiece. They\nseemed to be artists—painters may be—and, walking from\ntown to town, they were going towards Roma.\nAs they came along they were playing a strange song\nof the north. I stopped in my work to listen ; and liste-\nning, I put dewn my pencil and rose up quickly and\nran to call the others. 44 Did you hear the music? \" 44 Yes,\nisn't it lovely\".\nIt was indeed very lovely. Nothing wonderful like\nStrauss or Debussy perhaps; nor like Beethoven ; but in\nthe open air and coming tcwards us, these strange wild\nnotes sounded perfectly lovely and there an end to ar-\ngument.\nI ran out into the garden and leaned over the wall;—\nthey had passed, and, getting fifty paces away, had come\nto the end of their delicious piece. And they stopped. They\ndid not talk or laugh.\nThey were a little weary with their walking I dare\nsay; and besides this, a man full of wine was coming from\nthe direction in which they were going, gesticulating and\nlurching and making those bursting blatant noises which\ncome from the drinkers who are less gay than gloomy.\nHe was addressing the heavens, and called on them to\nwitness to the misery that mankind and the government\nhad brought him to.\nAnd then this happened. The three young men with\nthe music, who had sat down by the roadside, stood up\narid went towards him surrounding him on three sides,\nhemming him in like three of Robin Hood's outlaws would\nonce have hemmed in some rich farmer. And before you\ncould count nine they had begun to play music. They\nplayed it around him, all over him and into him ; and,\nwill ycu believe me, he stopped dead still, uttered never a\nsound, stood steady and with head depressed and turned\non one side listening.\nThey played on for over five minutes. Then without\na word they passed on towards Roma. The drunkard\npassed my house leaving them : not a sound, not a stagger,\nno lurching.\nThe days of miracles are past I knew, but the day of\nmusic will never pass.\nWe stand in great need of music today. Is there no\none who will bring it to us?"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c046", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c046", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "n. p.", "page_fin": "n. p.", "image_debut": 49, "image_fin": 49, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.10", "titre_corps": "PALAZZO BARBERINI", "titre_sommaire": "PALAZZO BARBERINI", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 49, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.49", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 70, "texte": "PALAZZO BARBERINI.\nIn which was the Theatre built by Bernini.\nPlate 3."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c047", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c047", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "45", "page_fin": "45", "image_debut": 51, "image_fin": 51, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.11", "titre_corps": "A NOTE UPON \"THE MASK\"", "titre_sommaire": "A NOTE UPON \"THE MASK\"", "signature_source": "LENNOX ROBINSON", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 51, "page_imprimee": "45", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.51", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4257, "texte": "A NOTE UPON\n\"THE MASK\".\nBY LENNOX ROBINSON.\nREPRINTED FROM\nTHE OBSERVER. LONDON.\nBELIEVING that many friends of \" The Mask \"\nof the New Movement in the Theatre will be interested\nin the following extract from an article by Mr Lennox\nRobinson published in \" The Observer \"9 London, on\nOctober 12th last, we reprint it, for those who may not\nhave seen it, by kind permission of the Editor of \" The\nObserver \", Mr /• L. Garvin.\n%\n44 THE BEST THEATRICAL MAGAZINE\no IN THE WORLD ' \\ o\nIT may seem an extraordinary thing to say, but 1 am\nalmost certain that Mr. Gordon Craig is the personage in\nthe English theatre to-day who most \" matters . True,\nin one sense he is not \"in \" the theatre at all; he pro-\nduces nothing, has no theatre of his own, makes a for-\ntune for no playwright, exploits no players, but, in spite\nof these things—or perhaps because of them—he looms\nwith a dreadful indistinct importance. No man in the\nEnglish theatre is so hated and reviled, no man so pas-\nsionately defended and revered.\n* *\nA man who can arouse such feelings of hatred and\nlove can indubitably be no nonentity. People do not\nguash their teeth and foam at the mouth over something\nthat does not matter, but foam and gnash the theatre\ndoes over Mr. Craig, and he evidently matters to a very\nintense degree. It is a little difficult to say just why\n(though it is easy to say that he is a genius, and that\ngenius always makes itself felt), and, turning over the\npages of the current number of \" The Mask\" I tried to\ndiscover what exactly was his secret, and why our attention\nis so arrested. For there is no doubt he does arrest it.\n45 The Mask \" is an amazing publication.\nI confess that, as a general rule, I am bored to extinc-\ntion by theatrical history and theatrical memoirs, and that\nit is almost inconceivable to myself . that I should find\nmyself reading with avidity of the plays witnessed by\nJohn Evelyn in London in the middle of the seventeenth\ncentury. Extracts from his diary, together with Mr. Craig's\ncomments thereon, fill a large portion of this \" Mask ,\nand I find myself reading every word greedily. Does my\ninterest spring from Mr. Craig's passionate, almost pathetic,\ninterest in the theatre, or is it awakened only by his own\nfine, vivid style ? But he has the faculty of inspiring\nothers. Every page of \" The Mask ' glows. Compared\nwith any other theatrical paper I know, it is as ginger-\nale long-opened is to champagne. This yellow magazine\nbubbles, is gay and provocative and sometimes perverse\nand absurd, but most often wise and serious, and at every\nmoment stimulating. It is as easy to imagine falling asleep\nat one's own execution as nodding over \" The Mask \".\nWhen I am feeling depressed I wonder whether there\nis any \" art \" of the theatre worth making a pother about,\nbut then the vision rises of this middle-aged Englishman\nin Florence (or is it in Rapallo ?) breaking his heart over\nit, and my spirits rise and I feel there must be something\nfor him to break his heart about. But his heart is very\nnearly broken. He knows it when, having dreamed of\nan interchange (\" not as propaganda, but to give delight \")\nof artists between the countries of the world, he cries out :\n\" I can see this because I am blind. But some one touches\nme on the shoulder as I write, and my pen slows down.\nAs though in a train that has stopped at no station,\nbut by some hedgerow; everyone popping heads out\nfrom the windows and having sensational moments. But\nthere is nothing really sensational: rather, a dull fact—the\nstoker is drunk; and what but intoxicated am I with this\nhope of what never was and what never will be ? \" And\nbecause we know that his heart is very nearly broken,\nwe continue to harry him and gibe him (though, as some-\none else in the magazine says with perfect ruth, he\nhas done nothing to interfere with our success in the\ntheatre), The quarry is panting, is very nearly down;\nif we can keep the hunt going a very little longer, he\nwill be only hound's meat. But 1 feel that Mr. Craig\nwould be the last person in the world to wish anyone to\nmake a poor mouth about him, and I content myself with\nsaying that if we have not given him a theatre he has\ngiven us the best theatrical magazine in the world.\n* October 1924.. Vol. 10 No. 4."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c050", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c050", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "46", "page_fin": "46", "image_debut": 52, "image_fin": 52, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.12", "titre_corps": "CORRESPONDENCE", "titre_sommaire": "CORRESPONDENCE", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 52, "page_imprimee": "46", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.52", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1861, "texte": "CORRESPONDENCE.\n\nTo the Editor of \"The Mask\".\nYours truly,\nA. E. DOBELL.\nDear Sir:\nRE 44 A Protest from an Actor \" in your issue for\nOctober. I hope to be abie to aliay the wrath of\n44 An English Actor , and vindicate the artist or artists\nresponsible for the three very interesting illustrations you\nhrave reproduced from any intention to insult the members\nof the Theatrical Professions.\nI have in my possession a number of Juvenile books\npublished by S. and J. Fuller, at the Temple of Fancy,\n1810 11, each of which contains a number of coloured\nprints similar to those you have reproduced. The prints\nare all headless as in your examples, but accompanying\neach set are, or should be, a detachable head and several\nhats which are made to fit in a slot at the back of the\nprint, so that the head and appropriate head-gear is easily\nattached to all the characters.\nI enclose, for reproduction, the 44 Character Harlequin \",\nwith the head in position. This is one of the Character\nfrom 44 Frank Feignwells Attempts to amuse his friends\non Twelrth Night, exhibited in a series of Characters\"\nLondon: printed for S. and J. Fuller, 1811.\nFour other titles in this series are Young Albert, the\nRoscius, Phoebe the Cottage Maid, exemplified in a series\nof rural figures. The History of Little Fanny. The History\nand Adventures of Little Henry.\n77 Charing Cross Road;\nLondon, W. C. 2.\nThe designs fondly sent by Mr Dobell would have\nbeen charming things to print; but the pictures for this\nquarter already exceed in number the usual allowance,\nand, added to this, they are in colour and would lose too\nmuch if translated into half-tone. But we thank him for\nhis timely information, and hope that, not only will our\nreaders be interested by it, as we ourselves are, but\nalso that \"An English Actor99 will be appeased. Ed.\n\n\"THE NEW THEATRE AND CINEMA OF\nSOVIET RUSSIA\""}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c052", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c052", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "46", "page_fin": "46", "image_debut": 52, "image_fin": 52, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.12.2", "titre_corps": "To the Editor of \"The Mask\"", "titre_sommaire": "To the Editor of \"The Mask\"", "signature_source": "A. E. DOBELL", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 52, "page_imprimee": "46", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.52", "debut_caractere": 17, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1814, "texte": "To the Editor of \"The Mask\".\nYours truly,\nA. E. DOBELL.\nDear Sir:\nRE 44 A Protest from an Actor \" in your issue for\nOctober. I hope to be abie to aliay the wrath of\n44 An English Actor , and vindicate the artist or artists\nresponsible for the three very interesting illustrations you\nhrave reproduced from any intention to insult the members\nof the Theatrical Professions.\nI have in my possession a number of Juvenile books\npublished by S. and J. Fuller, at the Temple of Fancy,\n1810 11, each of which contains a number of coloured\nprints similar to those you have reproduced. The prints\nare all headless as in your examples, but accompanying\neach set are, or should be, a detachable head and several\nhats which are made to fit in a slot at the back of the\nprint, so that the head and appropriate head-gear is easily\nattached to all the characters.\nI enclose, for reproduction, the 44 Character Harlequin \",\nwith the head in position. This is one of the Character\nfrom 44 Frank Feignwells Attempts to amuse his friends\non Twelrth Night, exhibited in a series of Characters\"\nLondon: printed for S. and J. Fuller, 1811.\nFour other titles in this series are Young Albert, the\nRoscius, Phoebe the Cottage Maid, exemplified in a series\nof rural figures. The History of Little Fanny. The History\nand Adventures of Little Henry.\n77 Charing Cross Road;\nLondon, W. C. 2.\nThe designs fondly sent by Mr Dobell would have\nbeen charming things to print; but the pictures for this\nquarter already exceed in number the usual allowance,\nand, added to this, they are in colour and would lose too\nmuch if translated into half-tone. But we thank him for\nhis timely information, and hope that, not only will our\nreaders be interested by it, as we ourselves are, but\nalso that \"An English Actor99 will be appeased. Ed."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c053", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c053", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "46", "page_fin": "46", "image_debut": 52, "image_fin": 52, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.12.3", "titre_corps": "\"THE NEW THEATRE AND CINEMA OF SOVIET RUSSIA\"", "titre_sommaire": "\"THE NEW THEATRE AND CINEMA OF SOVIET RUSSIA\"", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 52, "page_imprimee": "46", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.52", "debut_caractere": 1816, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1861, "texte": "\"THE NEW THEATRE AND CINEMA OF\nSOVIET RUSSIA\""}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c054", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c054", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "46", "page_fin": "46", "image_debut": 52, "image_fin": 52, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.12.3.1", "titre_corps": "The Editor of \"The Mask\"", "titre_sommaire": "The Editor of \"The Mask\"", "signature_source": "HUNTLY CARTER", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 52, "page_imprimee": "46", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.52", "debut_caractere": 1863, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2560, "texte": "The Editor of \"The Mask\".\nYours faithfully\nHUNTLY CARTER.\nSir :\nOF course my book, 44 The New Theatre and Cinema\nof Soviet Russia is well worth 52/-. My best\nthanks to Mr.. Gordon Craig for the suggestion. But as I\ndesire, as evidently Mr. Craig does, to produce a demand\nfor it let me say that its actual price is 25/-.\nWe thank Mr. Huntly Carter for his correction, and\nmuch regret that our printers, by reversing the 5 and the 2,\nmore than doubled the cost of his exceedingly cheap boofo\nreviewed on page /85 of our last number. But, as\nMr. Craig has nothing to do with the printers, we will\ntender the author s thanks to J. B., the reviewer; and to\nMr. Carter our apologies, for the error. Ed."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c055", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c055", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "46", "page_fin": "46", "image_debut": 52, "image_fin": 52, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.13", "titre_corps": "FOREIGN NOTES", "titre_sommaire": "FOREIGN NOTES", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 52, "page_imprimee": "46", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.52", "debut_caractere": 2562, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4366, "texte": "FOREIGN NOTES.\n\nLONDON. WET WEMBLEY.\nJ. B.\n|N November, in one final downpour of rain, the Prince\ni of Wales, >in an excellent speech, closed the big Empire\nExhibition after what has been undoubtedly a great success.\nFinancial success is not the only success, and of course\nthe Exhibition has cost much more money than it took\nin. But the Nation, and its exhibitons at Wembley, will\nobviously win back far more than they will be able to\ncalculate. I hey will make money, and wonder why, and\nperhaps not attribute it to this big show. But it is the\nshow which will have done it all the same.\nAnd what of the rain ? The picture of thousands\nof soaking Londoners with umbrellas is possibly an endu-\nring sight.... would it be any less so had provision been\nmade to keep them dry?\nWe suggest that architects be allowed to control the\nbuilding of future exhibitions ; being practical people, ar-\nchitects know all about how to protect crowds of people\nfrom great rains and great heat. They employ the arch,\nthe arcade, and many devices to do this. A good architect\nalso makes a fine looking piece of work, and the Empire\nExhibition was not a fine looking piece of work.\nWe also suggest that our next Pageant be somehow\nmade rather more original, five or six times less vast, and\ncost a third of the sum.\nIt has surprised many people to learn that the Pa-\ngeant cost a sum of money sufficient to have given England\na couple of Theatres in which to house its Drama, which\nDrama they say is in a poor plight. If it be so, one of\nthe reasons would seem to be, that there is too much\nmoney in England, not too little. Yet how often do people\nwho, one would think, should know better, privately or\npublicly inform all of us who would like to see good\nthings well supported that there is no money.\nWhat a horrid fib!"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c057", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c057", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "46", "page_fin": "46", "image_debut": 52, "image_fin": 52, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.13.2", "titre_corps": "LONDON. WET WEMBLEY", "titre_sommaire": "LONDON. WET WEMBLEY", "signature_source": "J. B", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 52, "page_imprimee": "46", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.52", "debut_caractere": 2578, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4366, "texte": "LONDON. WET WEMBLEY.\nJ. B.\n|N November, in one final downpour of rain, the Prince\ni of Wales, >in an excellent speech, closed the big Empire\nExhibition after what has been undoubtedly a great success.\nFinancial success is not the only success, and of course\nthe Exhibition has cost much more money than it took\nin. But the Nation, and its exhibitons at Wembley, will\nobviously win back far more than they will be able to\ncalculate. I hey will make money, and wonder why, and\nperhaps not attribute it to this big show. But it is the\nshow which will have done it all the same.\nAnd what of the rain ? The picture of thousands\nof soaking Londoners with umbrellas is possibly an endu-\nring sight.... would it be any less so had provision been\nmade to keep them dry?\nWe suggest that architects be allowed to control the\nbuilding of future exhibitions ; being practical people, ar-\nchitects know all about how to protect crowds of people\nfrom great rains and great heat. They employ the arch,\nthe arcade, and many devices to do this. A good architect\nalso makes a fine looking piece of work, and the Empire\nExhibition was not a fine looking piece of work.\nWe also suggest that our next Pageant be somehow\nmade rather more original, five or six times less vast, and\ncost a third of the sum.\nIt has surprised many people to learn that the Pa-\ngeant cost a sum of money sufficient to have given England\na couple of Theatres in which to house its Drama, which\nDrama they say is in a poor plight. If it be so, one of\nthe reasons would seem to be, that there is too much\nmoney in England, not too little. Yet how often do people\nwho, one would think, should know better, privately or\npublicly inform all of us who would like to see good\nthings well supported that there is no money.\nWhat a horrid fib!"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c058", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c058", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "47", "page_fin": "49", "image_debut": 53, "image_fin": 55, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.14", "titre_corps": "BOOK REVIEWS", "titre_sommaire": "BOOK REVIEWS", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 53, "page_imprimee": "47", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.53", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6341, "texte": "BOOK REVIEWS.\n\n/ PROFETI DI BABILONIA by\nG. F. Malipiero. Bottega di Poesia,\nMilano. Price 15 lire.\nTHIS Milanese Publishing Company\nproduces a quantity of books, some\nprinted very badly, and some excel-\nlently. It uses a poor sandy sort of\npaper without sufficient reason : for if\nthere is no perfect paper in Italy, young\nItalians could soon make some.\nIt is all nonsense nowadays\nto say there is no this, no that, with\nan awakened Italy easily able to make\neverything and make it perfectly.\nAnyhow, Signor Malipiero makes\nall he makes perfectly ; and this de-\nlightful book of scenes, letters, and\nextracts collected from 18th century\nwritings by Chiari, Carlo and Gaspare\nGozzi, Calsabigi, Affo, Algarotti, Ar-\nteaga, Metastasio, Milizia, and many\nothers, with an excellent preface and\nnotes by Malipiero himself, is as good\nas it could be.\nThe subject is the Theatre : they\nall speak of the Theatre of their time;\nand, as they are all serious men, the\ncollection is an important one, ....in\nsome ways the most important which\nexists.\nThe book consists of 438 pages of\nadmirable writing with one plate, is\nwell covered, distinguished in appearance,\nand costs only fifteen lire. It is, by\nthe way, dedicated to an Englishman.\nFourteen more books are announced\nia this series, 44 I Fascicoli Musicali \",\nof which this is the first.\nWe could do without a good half-\ndozen of them: for example, 44 Nerone\ndi Boifo \" by Guj ; 44 Opera and\nDrama \" by Wagner; 44 Falstaff di\nG. Verdi \" by della Corte ; 44 Beet-\nhoven \" by Rolland; and 44 Debussy\"\nby Perracchio. It is Italians, not Ger-\nmans and Frenchmen, we want to\nknow better.\nAs for Boito and Verdi, I some-\ntimes fee! that too much time has\nalready been devoted to these remar-\nkably famous composers.\nMore time given to telling us about\nthe lesser known composers and libret-\ntists and their assistants is what we\nlook for now. More about Pepoli,\nAlbergatti and Contarini, and their\nhouses and teatrini : more of Bibiena\nand his family, of the Galliari family,\nof the Mauri (or Mauro) family : of\nF. C. Motta, of Petronio Nanni, and\nRivani; of the singers and dancers\nwho are out-shaddowed today by the\neternal 4 4 return visit \" of Farinello\nand Cafarello.\nWhat of Sancta Stella, and Pi-\nstocci, what of architects like Sighizzi?\nHow is it that seemingly no book or\nbooklet exists telling us all about his\nservice to the Theatre ?\nI believe all these figures wait for\nSignor Malipiero to give them place\nand prominence, in a new book, for\nhe has a way of dealing with these\nfine things and people which does ho-\nnour to them.\n\nWOMAN IN WORLD HISTORY.\nHER PLACE IN THE GREAT\nRELIGIONS, by E. M. White.\nHerbert Jenkins. 8/6 net.\nWE dont quite like the title of the\nbook : ....however. Do we like\nthe book ? In it the author is stated\nto have 44 ransacked the ages and roam-\n\" ed the world to trace woman's\n44 influence in the story of civilization,\n44 with special* reference to the great\n44 religions, and to their effect on the\n44 position of womanhood. As the\n44 term religion has been taken in its\n44 broadest sense, it has included all\n44 the social and artistic spheres which\n44 each religion has touched, and thejre-\n44 fore the book covers nearly all the\n44 field of woman's hisjtory. The aim\n44 has been appreciation before criticism,\n44 and the conclusions reached are\n44 neither anti-man nor anti-feminist\nCertainly, in her 395 pages, Miss\nWhite gives us a great deal that is\ninteresting in regard to the life of\nwomen, from primitive times, and down\nthrough ancient Egypt, Babylonia and\nAssyria, through Hinduism, Buddhism,\nMahammedanism and Judaism, through\nancient Greece and Rome, and down\nfrom the beginning of the Christian Era\nto the present time : and her work is\nthe more useful because it is non-pole-\nmical : she has neither the frenzied\ndesire to prove that woman is at all\npoints the equal of man 44 only better\na desire, even if one which is never\nrealized,lhat characterizes certain ....too\ncertain.... feminist writers : nor has she\nthe inborn contempt for women which\ndetracts from the value of the writings\nof certain virulent anti-feminists. Her\nonly aim is to trace down through the\nages certain influences which reacted\nupon, and emanated from, one half of\nthe human species ; and the ways in\nwhich, in different periods, they rose\nto or lapsed from the fullest accom-\nplishment of their especial functions and\nprivileges as individuals and in relation\nto man and to the human family at\nlarge. It is not an unambitious aim,\nand we would recommend this book\nto the study of those who have often\ndisputed the conviction, now and again\nexpressed by writers in \" The Mask *\\\nthat women are not exactly in their\nright place upon the stage : they may\nlearn here that it was not any sign of\nthe belittlement of women by men, or\nof degradation, or undue weakness on\ntheir own part, when they preferred\nto hold their lives aloof from publicity,\nand especially from what a Russian\nauthor has called \"an amorous display'*\nbefore a public, for that spoilt public's\nentertainment.\nIt is a vexed question, I must\nadmit ; whether it be better to suffer\nthe slings and arrows, or to take arms\nagainst a sea ... and end the troubles.\nAnd I for one rather like to see\none role always acted by a woman :\nI refer to the part of \" Hamlet,...\"\nwith of course a man in the role of\nthe \" player queen\n\nMASKS AND DEMONS. K. Mac\nGowan and H. Rosse. Martin Hop-\nkjnson : London : 15/— net.\nWE already referred to this book\nin July 1924 when it reached us\nfrom its American publishers, Messrs\nHarcourt, Brace & Co ; we are glad\nnow to see that a English edition has\nappeared, and would recommend all\ntheatre students to secure a copy for\nthe sake of the large number of excel-\nlent illustrations it contains of masks\nof many nations, and the entertaining\ntext,\n\nRESTORATION COMEDY by\nBonamy Dohree. The Clarendon\nPress. Oxford. 6/— net.\nTHE Publishers announce that\"This\n44 book gives a general view of\n4 4 Comedy in the period from Etherege\n44 to Farquhar, and places certain aspects\n44 of Restoration Comedy in a new\n44 light. It investigates more thoroughly\n44 than has yet been done the vexed\n44 question of French influence, and\n44 proves by ample quotation that Res-\n44 toration Comedy was, in the main,\n48 a natural development of late Eliza-\n44 bethan work. But the principal"}, {"page_pdf": 54, "page_imprimee": "48", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.54", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6568, "texte": "41 content is a description and criticism\n44 of the work of the chief writers\n44 of the period, apart from any\n44 theory \".\nYes, and the whole thing is well\ndone; but where are the plays ?\nThis charming book of 182 pages\ngives us quite a number of passages\nfrom the plays, as though the author\nhad really felt as he went along that\nhe really couldn't continue to talk,\n(and talk so well) about them while\nwe, his hearers, were left utterly in the\ndark as to what he was talking about.\nSo he strikes a wax vesta now and\nagain and points to the pictures : 44 You\nsee what I mean \", he seems to say\nas he quotes a bit; at which out\ngoes the quotation, and we are again\nplunged in obscurity.\nThe fact is there are very few of\nus who know these plays well enough ;\nand I feel that Mr Dobree's ten chapters\nwould have been only in their right\nplace as prefaces to the plays of the\nsix authors on whom he discourses.\nWithout the plays the book is but\ndelightful meandering.\nOn page 138, for example, Mr Do-\nbree tells us that, 44 a thread of sadness\n44 and disillusion runs through these\n44 plays, and live passions break through\n44 the veil of cynicism wherewith the\n44 critical comedy clothes itself. We\n44 pierce through the social world to\n44 the realm of our underlying motives,\n44 to our ardours and desires, for beauty\n44 as well as for grosser satisfactions ;\n44 and Congreve reveals himself as a\n44 poet pleading for finer living \".\nWell, the thread of what you will\nmay run where it likes, but unless we\ncan be helped to follow it we are\nprone to grow a little sleepy.\nIt is of no use to say that we\nnierce through the social world \", and\nthat 44 Congreve reveals himself \", for,\nlacking the plays, no such blessed re-\nvelation can be ours.\nIn short, speech about a thing lacks\nall sanity without the hearers are first\ntold what it's all about and until they\ncan judge for themselves. A vague\nrecollection of Shakespeare is something\nto us when we come to read Coleridge\non his plays. And besides, we all\nhave a Shakespeare in the house. But\nwhen it comes to a play by Etherege\nand Shadwell, or even Congreve, unless\nthe play be in the same volume and\njoined to the discourse about it, we\nshall never be lured by the orator to\nread the play, to go out and hunt for\na copy, to buy the play or listen to the\norator; and it's quite likely we shall\ndamn the best orator and wonder why\nthe publisher didn't have enough faith\nso die Drama itself and had too much\nin the critic of it.\nIt is futile to hope that we shall\nbe sent by Mr Dobree to Eiherege,\nfor there is not time in 1925 for even\nthe average man to go trotting around ;\nand I for one will wager that very few\nof the exceptional men will have time\nto do so.\nBesides, there are too few and too\nexpensive Congreves and Ethereges in\nthe market. WANTED a shilling\nCongreve: ,.,.and for our part we\nwant that volume prefaced by Mr\nDobree.\nYes, there's something in it, isn't\nthere ?\n\nLIFE OF WILLIAM CONGREVE\nby Edmund Gosse C. B. Heinemann.\n7/6.\nMR Gosse is always gallant, and so\nhe was one of the earliest, if not\nthe very first, to write the Life of\nCongreve.\nHe might have written the life of\nEtheridge, but what would there have\nbeen gallant in such an act as that ?\nNo. Congreve the bore, that's the\nman to stand by, to prop up, force\nbefore the Public, stick to, and finally\ntriumph with.\nThat's the splendid English gallantry\nof it, and in Mr Gosse gallantry glows\nwith a steady flame.\nWhen I speak of Congreve as a\nbore, I only mean that he fails to be\nbrilliant like Etheridge or powerful like\nWycherley. He meanders, he has grace,\nhe is charming, .... he is, in fact, a\nperfect bore.\nWhat pains he is at to make no\nfaults, this perfect Congreve. But it\nis Mr Gosse and his book we have to\nconsider, and it seems to me as good\ntoday as it was when it first appeared\nsome years ago.\nWritten probably with great difficulty,\nit has about it all the signs of easy\nwriting.\nWhat is known of Congreve is ali\nthere, and what is known is really\nhardly worth recording.\nHow remarkable then that so great\nan impression has been made with this\nbook upon ali of us.\n\nTHE THEATRE: IDEAS AND\nIDEALS. J. W. H. Faulkner.\nA. Stockwell, London. 2/—.\nI wonder whether Mr Faulkner is\nquite correct in his statement that\n\" the first Theatre was built by the\nGreeks between three and four hundred\nyears before Christ M?\nI have an idea that theatres existed\nlong before that.\nAnd I wonder, is Mr Faulkner\ncorrect when he says that 44 An Exhi-\n44 bition of Paintings, a Concert, a\n44 Recital of Verses, a Display of Dan-\n44 cing.... none of these are entertain-\n44 ments \".\n1 wonder what he would call Po-\nlitics, as we receive them daily through\nthe newspaper. I, who am a theatre-\ngoer, rather resent seeing so much\ndrama made out of politics in our\nDaily Papers. It makes me quite bo-\nred when I go to hear a play.\nThe ideas and ideals set forth in\nthis little booklet of 32 pages are\nfreshly stated and familiar to us. The\nmore often they are repeated (provided\nanyone listens) the better for the London\nstage.\nUnfortunately in London hardly\nanyone has time to listen, except to\nhis own voice. What with having to\nget through a hard day's work, and\nhaving to sit through the wrong play\nat night, (for it's difficult to back a\nwinner each time), listening has to be\nput off until our August days at Mar-\ngate, when all we want to listen to\nthen is what are the tame waves saying.\nBut everyone belonging to the Bri-\ntish Drama League should assuredly\npurchase this two shillings's worth of\nIdeas and Ideals, and do their very\nbest to spread them through the length\nand breadth of the land.\nBut the first thing to do is to per-\nsuade people to listen,\n\nSMARAGDAS LOVER ; A Dra-\nmatic Phantasmagaria by W. /. Tur-\nner. Chatto & Windus. 5/-\nMR W. J, Turner has a very\nstrong, a very genuine sense of\nthe Theatre. It is needless to tell\nhim he avoids coming to the ordinary\nHecuba or to warn him not to be\ntempted away by unrealities, for it is\njust by wandering exactly where he\nwanders that he will come across the\nreal lady, There will then be no\ndoubt at all what Hecuba is to him\nand he to Hecuba. Shell be right\nthere, tragic or comic as he wills.\nMeantime, spite of this essential gift\nof his, he has not come across her\nthis time. But he is almost there.\nThis is not a little to be able to\nsay. For he hasn't been looking for\nher in any of the places she long\nago left.\nHis Phantasmagoria is a wierd and\nenchanting comedy which I think the\nEnglish actors of our day could make very\nlittle out of. When you have read it, if"}, {"page_pdf": 55, "page_imprimee": "49", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.55", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 5641, "texte": "you have an eye to its exploitation on the\nmodern stage, you more than likely close\nthe volume with the word 44 unsatis-\nfactory \" but what else can a thing\nof this kind be ? is not a Phantasma-\ngoria 44 a crowd or succession of dim\nor doubtfully real figures \" ?\nIn any event it is good reading for\nit moves along and without effort, so\nlong as one remembers that nothing is\nquite real. Sometimes it exceeds even\nunreality, not only in the situations but\nin the very speeches, as, for example,\nwhen the Prime Minister in the play\nsays of Sir Leo Edward Meyer,\n44 Extraordinary people these Jews!\nAll the world s shadiest transactions\nare done in their houses but never\nby them \".\nAgain i come to the principal de-\nfect in all plays, and that is not any\nfault committed by the authors. This\ndefect is that we are fast asleep in\nEngland so far as our Theatre is con-\ncerned. Proof: This.... Were we awake\nwe would of course produce this drama\nwithin the month; and the same au-\nthor's 44 Popomac \" play would have\ncome (come and gone, or come and\nstayed) at least a year ago.\nBut no, we are asleep. And how\nwe dream, to be sure. We dream\nthat by selecting what we think to be\nexcellent plays made in the right way\nwe may get at last at the plays.\nGloriously comic, crazy, dream. We\nshall get at last at the plays if we\nproduce without any pausing or any\nsilly sort of superior hesitation, every\nplay which every writer of even fair\ntalent, has the courage to pen.\nWe shall produce them cheaply,\nrapidly and well. It is quite easy to\ndo it cheaply and well provided you're\nrapid about it.\nWe shall thus put upon the stage\nmany hundreds of new plays each year,\nthree or four of which will prove\ntheir worth, thirty, or forty their promise,\nand some hundreds will pass away.\nWe (sleeping) dream that we can\nbe cleverer than that. Utter delu-\nsion.\nIn any case I hope Mr Turner\nwill write and publish every play that\nhe has even the faintest desire to write\nand publish, even if the London stage\nis not yet awake: for we want to see\nall that he has in his imagination;\ntechnically we see what he might do\nshould he wish to; but if the Theatre\nwill go on dreaming he cannot exactly\nexercise that wish to any great extent.\nThe English stage is in the condi-\ntion it was in years ago, Men of ta-\nlent exist who should be given Thea-\ntres so as to wake it up. Till it wakes\nup the work of thousands of writers,\nactors, producers, will be wasted, and\nI do not believe England can afford\nto waste in this manner, I wont call it\nshameful; it is merely excessively stupid\n\nA GUIDE TO CAPER by Thomas\nBodkin and Denis Eden. (Chatto &\nWindus). 5 shillings.\nC.\nAT'OU follow the pictures, not the\ntext, of this Guide,... if you want\nto get there: but the text helps.\nIt's the best five shillings* worth I\nhave seen for many a day. Mr Eden\nis a new name to us, but there is no-\nthing at all of the beginner about his\nwork.\nThe second picture, the last picture,\nthe ninth, tenth and eleventh pictures\nall play with light. If the sun is down\nthe moon shines; or a fire, or the stars\ntwinkle, and it is this light which gives\nus so much happiness when we look\nat these inhabitants of Caper, living the\nmost sensible existence man could ever\nlive, even after thinking about it for\nyears.\nI am an entire admirer of this ar-\ntist. I have nothing to find fault\nwith,... the whole thing is perfect.\nAnd not the least perfect thing about\nit is Messrs Chatto & Windus's ins-\ntinct or judgement, in having recogni-\nzed in Mr Eden an artist of first class\nfancy. Just as courtesy is in every\ntouch, so is there courtesy in the way\nit has been brought out.\nCharm is a word which extends to\nhoydens, Mrs Jordan was charming\nThis book is more than that.... and\nthe way it has been issued by the\npublishers, its paper, its covers, wrap-\nper, title page and all, reveals an un-\nderstanding for which I can find no\nbetter word than courtesy. If ten\nthousand copies be not sold quite soon\nI shall be very much surprised.\n\nTHE SLEEPING BEAUTY by\nEdith Sitwell. Duckworth. 5/- net.\nA poem of 96 pages is an achieve-\nment. I suppose Miss Sitwell a\nlover of the more eleborate drawings\nby Aubrey Beardsley.\nNever having read anything of hers\nbefore this is my impression.\nFirst that there are seasons and\nseasons for poems. I feel that this\none came out in the wrong season.\nI am in a cold room as I read this\npoem, and I wonder why it does not\ngo easily. Not Miss Sitwell's fault, but\nmine to be so placed twixt the cold and\nthis deep sea.\nObviously Miss Sitwell is full of\ngifts, clever, a poet, ....a graceful one;\nand with an ability to go on.\nAs I read it I find myself unable\nto believe that the Sleeping Beauty is\na theme any poet could make anything\nmore out of than has Miss Sit well.\n\nJUDAS. A Tragedy in Three Acts\nby Claude Houghton. 7he Four Sees\nCo. Boston. 2.00.\nI do not think that everyone and\nanyone should be at liberty to take\nup a pen and write tragedies in three\nacts or in four.\nIf they do so, and fail to write\nwell, I see no reason why they should\never do it again.\nMr Houghton has done ill, and I\nhope his next will be free from all\nthat I find in this play.\n\nTHYREA AND OTHER SON-\nNETS by John Ferguson. Andrew\nMelrose, Ltd. 1/6 net.\nTHIS little book of Sonnets, reprin-\nted from the 44 English Review\n44 Irish Monthly \" and other papers,\nis in its second edition. 1he theme\nof a large number of the sonnets is\nderived from theatre life and experien-\nces. It has an introduction by Mr.\nW. L. Courtney who writes 44 Here is\na booklet of sonnets which I can warm-\nly commend to the judicious reader \".\nI transmit his message to the readers\nof 44 The Mask \"."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c060", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c060", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "47", "page_fin": "47", "image_debut": 53, "image_fin": 53, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.14.2", "titre_corps": "/ PROFETI DI BABILONIA by", "titre_sommaire": "/ PROFETI DI BABILONIA by", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 53, "page_imprimee": "47", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.53", "debut_caractere": 15, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2581, "texte": "/ PROFETI DI BABILONIA by\nG. F. Malipiero. Bottega di Poesia,\nMilano. Price 15 lire.\nTHIS Milanese Publishing Company\nproduces a quantity of books, some\nprinted very badly, and some excel-\nlently. It uses a poor sandy sort of\npaper without sufficient reason : for if\nthere is no perfect paper in Italy, young\nItalians could soon make some.\nIt is all nonsense nowadays\nto say there is no this, no that, with\nan awakened Italy easily able to make\neverything and make it perfectly.\nAnyhow, Signor Malipiero makes\nall he makes perfectly ; and this de-\nlightful book of scenes, letters, and\nextracts collected from 18th century\nwritings by Chiari, Carlo and Gaspare\nGozzi, Calsabigi, Affo, Algarotti, Ar-\nteaga, Metastasio, Milizia, and many\nothers, with an excellent preface and\nnotes by Malipiero himself, is as good\nas it could be.\nThe subject is the Theatre : they\nall speak of the Theatre of their time;\nand, as they are all serious men, the\ncollection is an important one, ....in\nsome ways the most important which\nexists.\nThe book consists of 438 pages of\nadmirable writing with one plate, is\nwell covered, distinguished in appearance,\nand costs only fifteen lire. It is, by\nthe way, dedicated to an Englishman.\nFourteen more books are announced\nia this series, 44 I Fascicoli Musicali \",\nof which this is the first.\nWe could do without a good half-\ndozen of them: for example, 44 Nerone\ndi Boifo \" by Guj ; 44 Opera and\nDrama \" by Wagner; 44 Falstaff di\nG. Verdi \" by della Corte ; 44 Beet-\nhoven \" by Rolland; and 44 Debussy\"\nby Perracchio. It is Italians, not Ger-\nmans and Frenchmen, we want to\nknow better.\nAs for Boito and Verdi, I some-\ntimes fee! that too much time has\nalready been devoted to these remar-\nkably famous composers.\nMore time given to telling us about\nthe lesser known composers and libret-\ntists and their assistants is what we\nlook for now. More about Pepoli,\nAlbergatti and Contarini, and their\nhouses and teatrini : more of Bibiena\nand his family, of the Galliari family,\nof the Mauri (or Mauro) family : of\nF. C. Motta, of Petronio Nanni, and\nRivani; of the singers and dancers\nwho are out-shaddowed today by the\neternal 4 4 return visit \" of Farinello\nand Cafarello.\nWhat of Sancta Stella, and Pi-\nstocci, what of architects like Sighizzi?\nHow is it that seemingly no book or\nbooklet exists telling us all about his\nservice to the Theatre ?\nI believe all these figures wait for\nSignor Malipiero to give them place\nand prominence, in a new book, for\nhe has a way of dealing with these\nfine things and people which does ho-\nnour to them."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c061", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c061", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "47", "page_fin": "47", "image_debut": 53, "image_fin": 53, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.14.3", "titre_corps": "WOMAN IN WORLD HISTORY", "titre_sommaire": "WOMAN IN WORLD HISTORY", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 53, "page_imprimee": "47", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.53", "debut_caractere": 2583, "fin_caractere_exclue": 5362, "texte": "WOMAN IN WORLD HISTORY.\nHER PLACE IN THE GREAT\nRELIGIONS, by E. M. White.\nHerbert Jenkins. 8/6 net.\nWE dont quite like the title of the\nbook : ....however. Do we like\nthe book ? In it the author is stated\nto have 44 ransacked the ages and roam-\n\" ed the world to trace woman's\n44 influence in the story of civilization,\n44 with special* reference to the great\n44 religions, and to their effect on the\n44 position of womanhood. As the\n44 term religion has been taken in its\n44 broadest sense, it has included all\n44 the social and artistic spheres which\n44 each religion has touched, and thejre-\n44 fore the book covers nearly all the\n44 field of woman's hisjtory. The aim\n44 has been appreciation before criticism,\n44 and the conclusions reached are\n44 neither anti-man nor anti-feminist\nCertainly, in her 395 pages, Miss\nWhite gives us a great deal that is\ninteresting in regard to the life of\nwomen, from primitive times, and down\nthrough ancient Egypt, Babylonia and\nAssyria, through Hinduism, Buddhism,\nMahammedanism and Judaism, through\nancient Greece and Rome, and down\nfrom the beginning of the Christian Era\nto the present time : and her work is\nthe more useful because it is non-pole-\nmical : she has neither the frenzied\ndesire to prove that woman is at all\npoints the equal of man 44 only better\na desire, even if one which is never\nrealized,lhat characterizes certain ....too\ncertain.... feminist writers : nor has she\nthe inborn contempt for women which\ndetracts from the value of the writings\nof certain virulent anti-feminists. Her\nonly aim is to trace down through the\nages certain influences which reacted\nupon, and emanated from, one half of\nthe human species ; and the ways in\nwhich, in different periods, they rose\nto or lapsed from the fullest accom-\nplishment of their especial functions and\nprivileges as individuals and in relation\nto man and to the human family at\nlarge. It is not an unambitious aim,\nand we would recommend this book\nto the study of those who have often\ndisputed the conviction, now and again\nexpressed by writers in \" The Mask *\\\nthat women are not exactly in their\nright place upon the stage : they may\nlearn here that it was not any sign of\nthe belittlement of women by men, or\nof degradation, or undue weakness on\ntheir own part, when they preferred\nto hold their lives aloof from publicity,\nand especially from what a Russian\nauthor has called \"an amorous display'*\nbefore a public, for that spoilt public's\nentertainment.\nIt is a vexed question, I must\nadmit ; whether it be better to suffer\nthe slings and arrows, or to take arms\nagainst a sea ... and end the troubles.\nAnd I for one rather like to see\none role always acted by a woman :\nI refer to the part of \" Hamlet,...\"\nwith of course a man in the role of\nthe \" player queen"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c062", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c062", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "47", "page_fin": "47", "image_debut": 53, "image_fin": 53, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.14.4", "titre_corps": "MASKS AND DEMONS. K. Mac", "titre_sommaire": "MASKS AND DEMONS. K. Mac", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 53, "page_imprimee": "47", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.53", "debut_caractere": 5364, "fin_caractere_exclue": 5818, "texte": "MASKS AND DEMONS. K. Mac\nGowan and H. Rosse. Martin Hop-\nkjnson : London : 15/— net.\nWE already referred to this book\nin July 1924 when it reached us\nfrom its American publishers, Messrs\nHarcourt, Brace & Co ; we are glad\nnow to see that a English edition has\nappeared, and would recommend all\ntheatre students to secure a copy for\nthe sake of the large number of excel-\nlent illustrations it contains of masks\nof many nations, and the entertaining\ntext,"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c063", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c063", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "47", "page_fin": "48", "image_debut": 53, "image_fin": 54, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.14.5", "titre_corps": "RESTORATION COMEDY by", "titre_sommaire": "RESTORATION COMEDY by", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 53, "page_imprimee": "47", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.53", "debut_caractere": 5820, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6341, "texte": "RESTORATION COMEDY by\nBonamy Dohree. The Clarendon\nPress. Oxford. 6/— net.\nTHE Publishers announce that\"This\n44 book gives a general view of\n4 4 Comedy in the period from Etherege\n44 to Farquhar, and places certain aspects\n44 of Restoration Comedy in a new\n44 light. It investigates more thoroughly\n44 than has yet been done the vexed\n44 question of French influence, and\n44 proves by ample quotation that Res-\n44 toration Comedy was, in the main,\n48 a natural development of late Eliza-\n44 bethan work. But the principal"}, {"page_pdf": 54, "page_imprimee": "48", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.54", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2935, "texte": "41 content is a description and criticism\n44 of the work of the chief writers\n44 of the period, apart from any\n44 theory \".\nYes, and the whole thing is well\ndone; but where are the plays ?\nThis charming book of 182 pages\ngives us quite a number of passages\nfrom the plays, as though the author\nhad really felt as he went along that\nhe really couldn't continue to talk,\n(and talk so well) about them while\nwe, his hearers, were left utterly in the\ndark as to what he was talking about.\nSo he strikes a wax vesta now and\nagain and points to the pictures : 44 You\nsee what I mean \", he seems to say\nas he quotes a bit; at which out\ngoes the quotation, and we are again\nplunged in obscurity.\nThe fact is there are very few of\nus who know these plays well enough ;\nand I feel that Mr Dobree's ten chapters\nwould have been only in their right\nplace as prefaces to the plays of the\nsix authors on whom he discourses.\nWithout the plays the book is but\ndelightful meandering.\nOn page 138, for example, Mr Do-\nbree tells us that, 44 a thread of sadness\n44 and disillusion runs through these\n44 plays, and live passions break through\n44 the veil of cynicism wherewith the\n44 critical comedy clothes itself. We\n44 pierce through the social world to\n44 the realm of our underlying motives,\n44 to our ardours and desires, for beauty\n44 as well as for grosser satisfactions ;\n44 and Congreve reveals himself as a\n44 poet pleading for finer living \".\nWell, the thread of what you will\nmay run where it likes, but unless we\ncan be helped to follow it we are\nprone to grow a little sleepy.\nIt is of no use to say that we\nnierce through the social world \", and\nthat 44 Congreve reveals himself \", for,\nlacking the plays, no such blessed re-\nvelation can be ours.\nIn short, speech about a thing lacks\nall sanity without the hearers are first\ntold what it's all about and until they\ncan judge for themselves. A vague\nrecollection of Shakespeare is something\nto us when we come to read Coleridge\non his plays. And besides, we all\nhave a Shakespeare in the house. But\nwhen it comes to a play by Etherege\nand Shadwell, or even Congreve, unless\nthe play be in the same volume and\njoined to the discourse about it, we\nshall never be lured by the orator to\nread the play, to go out and hunt for\na copy, to buy the play or listen to the\norator; and it's quite likely we shall\ndamn the best orator and wonder why\nthe publisher didn't have enough faith\nso die Drama itself and had too much\nin the critic of it.\nIt is futile to hope that we shall\nbe sent by Mr Dobree to Eiherege,\nfor there is not time in 1925 for even\nthe average man to go trotting around ;\nand I for one will wager that very few\nof the exceptional men will have time\nto do so.\nBesides, there are too few and too\nexpensive Congreves and Ethereges in\nthe market. WANTED a shilling\nCongreve: ,.,.and for our part we\nwant that volume prefaced by Mr\nDobree.\nYes, there's something in it, isn't\nthere ?"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c064", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c064", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "48", "page_fin": "48", "image_debut": 54, "image_fin": 54, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.14.6", "titre_corps": "LIFE OF WILLIAM CONGREVE", "titre_sommaire": "LIFE OF WILLIAM CONGREVE", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 54, "page_imprimee": "48", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.54", "debut_caractere": 2937, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4117, "texte": "LIFE OF WILLIAM CONGREVE\nby Edmund Gosse C. B. Heinemann.\n7/6.\nMR Gosse is always gallant, and so\nhe was one of the earliest, if not\nthe very first, to write the Life of\nCongreve.\nHe might have written the life of\nEtheridge, but what would there have\nbeen gallant in such an act as that ?\nNo. Congreve the bore, that's the\nman to stand by, to prop up, force\nbefore the Public, stick to, and finally\ntriumph with.\nThat's the splendid English gallantry\nof it, and in Mr Gosse gallantry glows\nwith a steady flame.\nWhen I speak of Congreve as a\nbore, I only mean that he fails to be\nbrilliant like Etheridge or powerful like\nWycherley. He meanders, he has grace,\nhe is charming, .... he is, in fact, a\nperfect bore.\nWhat pains he is at to make no\nfaults, this perfect Congreve. But it\nis Mr Gosse and his book we have to\nconsider, and it seems to me as good\ntoday as it was when it first appeared\nsome years ago.\nWritten probably with great difficulty,\nit has about it all the signs of easy\nwriting.\nWhat is known of Congreve is ali\nthere, and what is known is really\nhardly worth recording.\nHow remarkable then that so great\nan impression has been made with this\nbook upon ali of us."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c065", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c065", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "48", "page_fin": "48", "image_debut": 54, "image_fin": 54, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.14.7", "titre_corps": "THE THEATRE: IDEAS AND", "titre_sommaire": "THE THEATRE: IDEAS AND", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 54, "page_imprimee": "48", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.54", "debut_caractere": 4119, "fin_caractere_exclue": 5692, "texte": "THE THEATRE: IDEAS AND\nIDEALS. J. W. H. Faulkner.\nA. Stockwell, London. 2/—.\nI wonder whether Mr Faulkner is\nquite correct in his statement that\n\" the first Theatre was built by the\nGreeks between three and four hundred\nyears before Christ M?\nI have an idea that theatres existed\nlong before that.\nAnd I wonder, is Mr Faulkner\ncorrect when he says that 44 An Exhi-\n44 bition of Paintings, a Concert, a\n44 Recital of Verses, a Display of Dan-\n44 cing.... none of these are entertain-\n44 ments \".\n1 wonder what he would call Po-\nlitics, as we receive them daily through\nthe newspaper. I, who am a theatre-\ngoer, rather resent seeing so much\ndrama made out of politics in our\nDaily Papers. It makes me quite bo-\nred when I go to hear a play.\nThe ideas and ideals set forth in\nthis little booklet of 32 pages are\nfreshly stated and familiar to us. The\nmore often they are repeated (provided\nanyone listens) the better for the London\nstage.\nUnfortunately in London hardly\nanyone has time to listen, except to\nhis own voice. What with having to\nget through a hard day's work, and\nhaving to sit through the wrong play\nat night, (for it's difficult to back a\nwinner each time), listening has to be\nput off until our August days at Mar-\ngate, when all we want to listen to\nthen is what are the tame waves saying.\nBut everyone belonging to the Bri-\ntish Drama League should assuredly\npurchase this two shillings's worth of\nIdeas and Ideals, and do their very\nbest to spread them through the length\nand breadth of the land.\nBut the first thing to do is to per-\nsuade people to listen,"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c066", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c066", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "48", "page_fin": "49", "image_debut": 54, "image_fin": 55, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.14.8", "titre_corps": "SMARAGDAS LOVER ; A", "titre_sommaire": "SMARAGDAS LOVER ; A", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 54, "page_imprimee": "48", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.54", "debut_caractere": 5694, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6568, "texte": "SMARAGDAS LOVER ; A Dra-\nmatic Phantasmagaria by W. /. Tur-\nner. Chatto & Windus. 5/-\nMR W. J, Turner has a very\nstrong, a very genuine sense of\nthe Theatre. It is needless to tell\nhim he avoids coming to the ordinary\nHecuba or to warn him not to be\ntempted away by unrealities, for it is\njust by wandering exactly where he\nwanders that he will come across the\nreal lady, There will then be no\ndoubt at all what Hecuba is to him\nand he to Hecuba. Shell be right\nthere, tragic or comic as he wills.\nMeantime, spite of this essential gift\nof his, he has not come across her\nthis time. But he is almost there.\nThis is not a little to be able to\nsay. For he hasn't been looking for\nher in any of the places she long\nago left.\nHis Phantasmagoria is a wierd and\nenchanting comedy which I think the\nEnglish actors of our day could make very\nlittle out of. When you have read it, if"}, {"page_pdf": 55, "page_imprimee": "49", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.55", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2558, "texte": "you have an eye to its exploitation on the\nmodern stage, you more than likely close\nthe volume with the word 44 unsatis-\nfactory \" but what else can a thing\nof this kind be ? is not a Phantasma-\ngoria 44 a crowd or succession of dim\nor doubtfully real figures \" ?\nIn any event it is good reading for\nit moves along and without effort, so\nlong as one remembers that nothing is\nquite real. Sometimes it exceeds even\nunreality, not only in the situations but\nin the very speeches, as, for example,\nwhen the Prime Minister in the play\nsays of Sir Leo Edward Meyer,\n44 Extraordinary people these Jews!\nAll the world s shadiest transactions\nare done in their houses but never\nby them \".\nAgain i come to the principal de-\nfect in all plays, and that is not any\nfault committed by the authors. This\ndefect is that we are fast asleep in\nEngland so far as our Theatre is con-\ncerned. Proof: This.... Were we awake\nwe would of course produce this drama\nwithin the month; and the same au-\nthor's 44 Popomac \" play would have\ncome (come and gone, or come and\nstayed) at least a year ago.\nBut no, we are asleep. And how\nwe dream, to be sure. We dream\nthat by selecting what we think to be\nexcellent plays made in the right way\nwe may get at last at the plays.\nGloriously comic, crazy, dream. We\nshall get at last at the plays if we\nproduce without any pausing or any\nsilly sort of superior hesitation, every\nplay which every writer of even fair\ntalent, has the courage to pen.\nWe shall produce them cheaply,\nrapidly and well. It is quite easy to\ndo it cheaply and well provided you're\nrapid about it.\nWe shall thus put upon the stage\nmany hundreds of new plays each year,\nthree or four of which will prove\ntheir worth, thirty, or forty their promise,\nand some hundreds will pass away.\nWe (sleeping) dream that we can\nbe cleverer than that. Utter delu-\nsion.\nIn any case I hope Mr Turner\nwill write and publish every play that\nhe has even the faintest desire to write\nand publish, even if the London stage\nis not yet awake: for we want to see\nall that he has in his imagination;\ntechnically we see what he might do\nshould he wish to; but if the Theatre\nwill go on dreaming he cannot exactly\nexercise that wish to any great extent.\nThe English stage is in the condi-\ntion it was in years ago, Men of ta-\nlent exist who should be given Thea-\ntres so as to wake it up. Till it wakes\nup the work of thousands of writers,\nactors, producers, will be wasted, and\nI do not believe England can afford\nto waste in this manner, I wont call it\nshameful; it is merely excessively stupid"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c067", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c067", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "49", "page_fin": "49", "image_debut": 55, "image_fin": 55, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.14.9", "titre_corps": "A GUIDE TO CAPER by Thomas Bodkin and Denis Eden. (Chatto & Windus). 5 shillings", "titre_sommaire": "A GUIDE TO CAPER by Thomas Bodkin and Denis Eden. (Chatto & Windus). 5 shillings", "signature_source": "C", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 55, "page_imprimee": "49", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.55", "debut_caractere": 2560, "fin_caractere_exclue": 3983, "texte": "A GUIDE TO CAPER by Thomas\nBodkin and Denis Eden. (Chatto &\nWindus). 5 shillings.\nC.\nAT'OU follow the pictures, not the\ntext, of this Guide,... if you want\nto get there: but the text helps.\nIt's the best five shillings* worth I\nhave seen for many a day. Mr Eden\nis a new name to us, but there is no-\nthing at all of the beginner about his\nwork.\nThe second picture, the last picture,\nthe ninth, tenth and eleventh pictures\nall play with light. If the sun is down\nthe moon shines; or a fire, or the stars\ntwinkle, and it is this light which gives\nus so much happiness when we look\nat these inhabitants of Caper, living the\nmost sensible existence man could ever\nlive, even after thinking about it for\nyears.\nI am an entire admirer of this ar-\ntist. I have nothing to find fault\nwith,... the whole thing is perfect.\nAnd not the least perfect thing about\nit is Messrs Chatto & Windus's ins-\ntinct or judgement, in having recogni-\nzed in Mr Eden an artist of first class\nfancy. Just as courtesy is in every\ntouch, so is there courtesy in the way\nit has been brought out.\nCharm is a word which extends to\nhoydens, Mrs Jordan was charming\nThis book is more than that.... and\nthe way it has been issued by the\npublishers, its paper, its covers, wrap-\nper, title page and all, reveals an un-\nderstanding for which I can find no\nbetter word than courtesy. If ten\nthousand copies be not sold quite soon\nI shall be very much surprised."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c068", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c068", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "49", "page_fin": "49", "image_debut": 55, "image_fin": 55, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.14.10", "titre_corps": "THE SLEEPING BEAUTY by", "titre_sommaire": "THE SLEEPING BEAUTY by", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 55, "page_imprimee": "49", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.55", "debut_caractere": 3985, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4752, "texte": "THE SLEEPING BEAUTY by\nEdith Sitwell. Duckworth. 5/- net.\nA poem of 96 pages is an achieve-\nment. I suppose Miss Sitwell a\nlover of the more eleborate drawings\nby Aubrey Beardsley.\nNever having read anything of hers\nbefore this is my impression.\nFirst that there are seasons and\nseasons for poems. I feel that this\none came out in the wrong season.\nI am in a cold room as I read this\npoem, and I wonder why it does not\ngo easily. Not Miss Sitwell's fault, but\nmine to be so placed twixt the cold and\nthis deep sea.\nObviously Miss Sitwell is full of\ngifts, clever, a poet, ....a graceful one;\nand with an ability to go on.\nAs I read it I find myself unable\nto believe that the Sleeping Beauty is\na theme any poet could make anything\nmore out of than has Miss Sit well."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c069", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c069", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "49", "page_fin": "49", "image_debut": 55, "image_fin": 55, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.14.11", "titre_corps": "JUDAS. A Tragedy in Three Acts", "titre_sommaire": "JUDAS. A Tragedy in Three Acts", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 55, "page_imprimee": "49", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.55", "debut_caractere": 4754, "fin_caractere_exclue": 5143, "texte": "JUDAS. A Tragedy in Three Acts\nby Claude Houghton. 7he Four Sees\nCo. Boston. 2.00.\nI do not think that everyone and\nanyone should be at liberty to take\nup a pen and write tragedies in three\nacts or in four.\nIf they do so, and fail to write\nwell, I see no reason why they should\never do it again.\nMr Houghton has done ill, and I\nhope his next will be free from all\nthat I find in this play."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c070", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c070", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "49", "page_fin": "49", "image_debut": 55, "image_fin": 55, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.14.12", "titre_corps": "THYREA AND OTHER", "titre_sommaire": "THYREA AND OTHER", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 55, "page_imprimee": "49", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.55", "debut_caractere": 5145, "fin_caractere_exclue": 5641, "texte": "THYREA AND OTHER SON-\nNETS by John Ferguson. Andrew\nMelrose, Ltd. 1/6 net.\nTHIS little book of Sonnets, reprin-\nted from the 44 English Review\n44 Irish Monthly \" and other papers,\nis in its second edition. 1he theme\nof a large number of the sonnets is\nderived from theatre life and experien-\nces. It has an introduction by Mr.\nW. L. Courtney who writes 44 Here is\na booklet of sonnets which I can warm-\nly commend to the judicious reader \".\nI transmit his message to the readers\nof 44 The Mask \"."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c071", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c071", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "49", "page_fin": "49", "image_debut": 55, "image_fin": 55, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.15", "titre_corps": "BOOK NOTES", "titre_sommaire": "BOOK NOTES", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 55, "page_imprimee": "49", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.55", "debut_caractere": 5643, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6415, "texte": "BOOK NOTES.\n\nHERE in Italy much Theatre litera-\nture is continually published.\nAn interesting article on the work\nof Gordon Craig by Henry Furst ap-\npeared in \" II Piccolo * lately.\nAnother appeared on the same\nsubject in \" Comoedia \" for November\n10th, which is issued in Milano. The\narticle was written by A. Nasaili Rocca,\nwho contributed an article on the old\nTheatres of Piacenza to the October\nnumber of \" The Mask .\n\" Comoedia \" often contains inte-\nresting items. It is published by Mon-\ndadori, (Galleria Vittorio Emanuele 74)\nMilano, and edited by Umberto Frac-\nchia, a young writer of talent and\nexperience.\nO\n\nPITY THE POOR PLAY WRITER.\n44 The average fee for a three act\nplay is five pounds per performance .\nMonica Ewer, in\n44 Play Production for Everyone \"."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c072", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c072", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "49", "page_fin": "49", "image_debut": 55, "image_fin": 55, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.15.1", "titre_corps": "HERE in Italy much Theatre", "titre_sommaire": "HERE in Italy much Theatre", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 55, "page_imprimee": "49", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.55", "debut_caractere": 5656, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6263, "texte": "HERE in Italy much Theatre litera-\nture is continually published.\nAn interesting article on the work\nof Gordon Craig by Henry Furst ap-\npeared in \" II Piccolo * lately.\nAnother appeared on the same\nsubject in \" Comoedia \" for November\n10th, which is issued in Milano. The\narticle was written by A. Nasaili Rocca,\nwho contributed an article on the old\nTheatres of Piacenza to the October\nnumber of \" The Mask .\n\" Comoedia \" often contains inte-\nresting items. It is published by Mon-\ndadori, (Galleria Vittorio Emanuele 74)\nMilano, and edited by Umberto Frac-\nchia, a young writer of talent and\nexperience.\nO"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c073", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c073", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "49", "page_fin": "49", "image_debut": 55, "image_fin": 55, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.15.2", "titre_corps": "PITY THE POOR PLAY WRITER", "titre_sommaire": "PITY THE POOR PLAY WRITER", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 55, "page_imprimee": "49", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.55", "debut_caractere": 6265, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6415, "texte": "PITY THE POOR PLAY WRITER.\n44 The average fee for a three act\nplay is five pounds per performance .\nMonica Ewer, in\n44 Play Production for Everyone \"."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c074", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c074", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "50", "page_fin": "52", "image_debut": 56, "image_fin": 58, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.16", "titre_corps": "EDITORIAL NOTES", "titre_sommaire": "EDITORIAL NOTES", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 56, "page_imprimee": "50", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.56", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6652, "texte": "EDITORIAL NOTES.\n\nTHE ITALIAN THEATRE.\nTHE old Italian Theatre, and by\nthat we mean its professional Thea-\ntre as it is today, pleases us so much\nthat, unless very fine innovations are\nmade, we would respectfully suggest\nthat it is perhaps better for the Ita-\nlians to avoid novelties.\nTheir Theatre is not the first in\nEurope because of the elegance and\ncomfort of its poltrone and its palchi\n(there England and America lead),\nnor because scenographically it is suf-\nficient, or because it is developing a\nnew group of excellent playwrights.\nIt is first by virtue of its first-class\nacting and singing, because acting and\nsinging come to Italians apparently with\nimmense ease ....not because of any\ncleverness, which after all is a very\nsmall thing at best.\nFirst they have a language; they\nknow how to speak it : they never\nmumble, drawl, are never foggy; all\nis crisp, deliberate, and rapid. They\nknow how to carry themselves ; they\nare born professionals; they 44 act\nthey do not pretend to deceive us\nthat they are 44 real \".\nYet while acting they never play at\n44 make believe \" ; they do not imi-\ntate toy soldiers and fashion plates and\nstatuary. While they are never unreal\nin that sense, 44 Realism \" has never\nbeen thinkable to them, for they know\nwhat is what, and find Realism as\nlaughable as they find forced arti-\nficiality depressing.\nThis it is which we think places\nall Italian actors in another sphere to\nthe actors of Russia, who are born\n*\nrealists and deuced serious about it all,\nor born copyists of statuary, engra-\nvings, wooden toys and the like. Ita-\nlian actors are not like German actors,\nwho are always earnest and clever but\nnever quite the thing. Certainly En-\nglish actors are the most gentlemanly\nin Europe; and French actors, ever\nthe neatest; but Italian actors are ac-\ntors before Abraham was,\nSo that when nowadays innovations\nare made in the way that the 44 Indepen-\ndenti the 44 Tetiteairo \" or T6thys-\nTheatre make them, or as Signor Bra-\ngaglia makes them, we regret to say\nthat they ring false. The 44 innovators \"\ndo nothing original.\nIt is all what we call rather cheap.\nWe have seen the designs for the\nnew 44 Teatro del Convegno \" and it\nstrikes us they are curiously poor.\nIf Italy possessed the knack for imi-\ntating northern nations, it would not\nhave waited twenty years to seize on\nthe notion used- now as an inn vation\nfor the new stage of the 44 Teatro del\nConvegno \".\nThe 44 Piccola Canobbiana \" de-\nsigns for stage machines and audito-\nrium and proscenium are no better.\nSironi's designs for 44 I cavalieri \"\nare influenced by northern notions but\nare not at all good.\nAs for Signor Bragaglia, he has\nmuch excellent energy, little judgment\nand no originality. He catches hold\nof all the notions he can find in the\nbooks of the last twenty-five years,\nand on a small stage he manages to\nhuddle them all together, bringing out\nmuch printed matter to announce their\nexistence. The whole effect is that of\na mis-fit. Of course he does not\nadmit where he has gathered most of\nthese notions : he seems to think that\nthey are public property. By thus using\nthem he becomes one of the public.\nWe don't like it a bit. Signor Bra-\ngaglia can, we feel sure, do better, ....or\ndo less. It's not at all worthy of the\nimmense tradition of the Italian stage.\nItalians have imagination, have always\nhad it. So that to echo and to copy\nis, in an Italian, very poor, and in no\nway represents the new spirit which\nhas inspired Italy to stand on its own\nmerits in all things, and which seems\nto possess enough force to last out the\ncenturies.\nThe Facist Theatre, when it comes,\nwill be one of the blossoms of this\nNew Italy which today has no time\nto turn to thoughts of blossoming, since\nits sole thought is the natural one, ....that\nof spreading roots.\nPlenty of time for the arts later on.\nInevitably those arts will blossom in\ntime. Meanwhile these sad attempts\nto 44 innovate \" in the grand Italian\ntheatre are rather ridiculous; and the\nnotion that the Italian spectators, are\ntaken in cannot be maintained for a\nmoment.\n\nA POET'S THEATRE.\nMR John Masefield has built him-\nself a theatre at Boar's Hill, near\nOxford.\n\" What ridiculous nonsense \" is the\nverdict of those folk who cannot al-\nlow that a Theatre may be other than\nthe swagger Teatro Fenice in Venezia\nor the Prinz Regenten in Munchen.\nAs though Selva and Semper (or\nwhoever built the Wagner Theatre)\nare to be the only model husbandmen.\nWho knows better than a Dramatic\npoet what kind of Theatre is suited to his\nplays ? We understand that the Poetic\nDrama by several poets will be presented\nby Mr Masefield at his playhouse, which\nis a simply constructed building in his\ngarden, and is designed to accommodate\nabout one hundred persons. A first\nproduction has been already given, and\nafter Christmas it is hoped that an Eliza-\nbethan comedy may be produced. The\nstage is broad and sceneries are not\ngoing to be allowed to be a nuisance.\nOne London paper was cruel enough\nto say that 44 artistic curtains \" would\nbe used in place of the sceneries. As\na matter of fact we believe that Mr\nMasefield has around him a group of\ndisciples, not studying how to write,\nbut helping Mr Masefield how to play\nat theatres.\nAnd in our. opinion to play at Thea-\ntres in England is the very best thing\none could possibly do. And if in the\ncountry, the country wvay of doing this\nis ihe right way. That is why we\nutterly disbelieve the shocking suggestion\nof 44 artistic curtains Country thatch\ncountry wattles, country oak planks,,.,\nany of these as a background if you\nlike; there is danger in 44 artistic curtains \"\nthey are apt to catch fire. But then this\nwould assuredly bring Mr Masefield's\nplayhouse all the advertisement from\nwhich we think a country theatre should\nbe entirely exempt, but which the prac-\ntical man, even if he be in the desert,\nthinks is necessary.\nThe unfortunate fate of too many\na country playhouse is that it becomes\nthrough advertisement, just what the\npoet would hate it to be, ....what the\npoet never for a moment suspected it\nwas being lured to be; that is to say,\na bit of a sensation.\nWe recall the fate of several coun-\ntry, or semi-rural, playhouses, Before a\nyear was out someone (assuredly not\nthe Poet) had been over-energetic;\n(that 4 practical * person over again) it\nhad been dragged or pushed up to\nLondon, where it played a while and\nwent out, puff, like a lamp.\nWhy, after having chosen a noble\nrural spot as the place of places for\na Theatre, a dash should be made at\nthe first chance for London, is puzzling.\nGoethe, who played with Theatres,\nplayed with a real playhouse ....in\nWeimar.... with a Court as well as"}, {"page_pdf": 57, "page_imprimee": "51", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.57", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 7058, "texte": "the towns-people as spectators. He\nworked hard at this playhouse of his,\nand it was even less than the poodle\nyou will remember which caused his\ndownfall as Theatre Director. It was\neven Fraulein Caroline Jagemann.\nAnd there have been other poets who\nfor a time have had little playhouses.\nVoltaire had one at Ferney. Here,\nabout 1776, Lekain stopped for some\ndays to perform to a select and ap-\npreciative audience. At Cirey, too,\nVoltaire had a playhouse of his own :\nand some years earlier had one in his\nvilla at Vernier, but we never hear of\nhim suddenly carrying his charming if\namateur troupe to Paris or Berlin.\nWe have not seen any drawings or\nengravings of these Theatres, but in\n1772, (about the time of the Ver-\nnier theatricals) it was customary to\nbe too magnificent rather than too\nsimple. The playhouse was a word\nwhich stood for something with style,\na sparkle of swagger in it. The poet\nAlbergatti liked things to look well-\ndressed, and so his theatre in Zola\nnear Bologna was the very thing. A\nlittle bit of a village this same Zola,\nbut then a big piece of a Chateau,\nand in the Chateau some Teatrino\nas Mr Stein would say, to seat three\nhundred people. And the poet Pe-\npoli.... how many theatres he built in\nhis houses in Venezia and Bologna\nand in his villas at Codalunga and\nelsewhere has net yet been decided.\nBut it is on record that he not only\nhad his own plays and those of other\npoets performed in them, but also\noperas in prose and ballets, in which\nPepoli danced, 44 the best dancer of\nthem all \" says the historian.\nBut of all private country theatres\nthat at Esterhaz, where Haydn lived\nfor many years writing his divine things\nfor the only quite divine performers....\nfor marionnettes.... is the country thea-\ntre we like to think of most. Haydn\nand Masefieid would have got on well\ntogether, we believe. What a pity\nthat the old Count Esterhazy of those\ndays is no more among us to show us\nall how.... exactly how.... a country\ntheatre should be set before the King :\n—or rather before himself and his\nhousehold. But as he is not with us,\nand as no lord seems to have retained\nthe old tricks that lords once played,\nwe must be content when a poet or\nany other artist rigs out a theatre for\nhimself. It's not the thing to do;...\n' Art for Art's sake' is no fun at all;\nand theatre for theatre's even less: but\nwhat would you ?... when a poet is\nat the same time a grand Signore he\ncan do these things as some of us\nthink they should be done ; when he\nhas only his crown of laurels, even if\nhe do them better, he cannot do them\nas they should be done.\nMr Masefieid will do them like a sim-\nple English poet, and that means he will\ndo them just as well as they can pos-\nsibly be done ; and those of us who\ncannot be there, will feel envious of those\nwho can, and who will hear beautiful\nverse spoken as it should be spoken.\nSee plate 2 and Page 35 for some\nidea of what a little private Theatre\nmeant in the 28th centmy, Ed.\n\nVALUELESS NEWS.\nTHE Observer in its issue for No-\nvember 2nd. had an exceptionally\nfunny twenty-five lines about a Berlin\nTheatre. Here it is : —\nEVEN BERLIN SHOCKED.\nTHE DRAMATIC THE A TRE\nCOMES TO GRIEF.\nThe movement of a few enthu-\nsiasts to help forward the great band\nof unacted dramatists has received a\ncrushing blow. The new \" Dramatic\nTheatre \", which opened with every\nencouragement from the critics, and\nwhich produced George Kaiser's (t Bil-\nles and Jeanne \" as its first venture,\nhas since alienated every type of au-\ndience by a succession of extravagant\nplays violating all canons of good\ntaste even in so exceptionally broad-\n-minded a city as Berlin.\nThe result is a triumph for the\nwatchful Clerical Centre party, whose\nmembers have their own theatre league,\nbut needed their own house. While\nthe Social-Democrats support their own\nexcellent '' People's Theatre *which\ncarefully avoids plays of reactionary\ntendency, the tf Dramatic Theatre \"\nhas now become the home of the po-\nlitical Catholics, whose taste in drama\nis characterised not so much by pro-\npaganda as by elimination. This rules\nout, for instance, not only three-cor-\nnered problems, but divorce in its\nentirety. This is a triumph for the\nideals of the Centre, which would pass\nunnoticed in a Catholic province, but\nis a sign of its renewed activity in\nBerlin.\nq What foolery and what cliches !\nReally, it is time to ask even this\nwell-nigh perfect journal to make a\nscrap of its Foreign Theatre Correspon-\ndents and start afresh.\nFor some time we have studied\ncarefully the theatrical news sent to\n44 The Observer \" from Wien, Berlin,\nand Budapest; and have wondered how\nlong Mr Garvin would let it go on.\nWhy is foreign theatrical news\nnecesary to 44 The Observer unless\nit be either very entertaining or very\ninforming ?\nWe suppose that the only people\nwho feel the necessity are those who\nare ever active in informing London\nthat the North European Theatre is\nquite the most important upon earth.\nHundreds of English actors doubt-\nless read 44 The Observer \", but they\nwill surely not be impressed by the\nnonsense which week after week is\nsent from Wien, Berlin and Pest.\nFor example what the dickens is\nthere of interest in this twaddle from\nBerlin about some Theatre which is\n44 the home of the political Catholics \"\nand \" whose taste is characterised by\nelimination \" ? And how comes it that\nthis or any taste 44 rules out \" divorce\nin its entirety, and how is this 44 a\ntriumph for the ideals of the Centre \" ?\nAnd then, 44 Catholic province 44 re-\nnewed activity 44 watchful clerical\ncentre party \", 44 broadminded city of\nBerlin\".—Really, 44 Observer \" ! you\nwho are the very pride of journalism\nand our delight, to accept such Pro-\npaganda from the Theatre of Elimi-\nnation in Berlin is not what you came\ninto existence to do. To hear from\nWien or Budapest that an audience\nhas sat spellbound, or that one could\nhave heard a pin drop, hardly carries\nas far as London.\nBesides, what Austria and Germany\ndo in Theatres is not half as important\nas the good 44 Observer\" seems to\nthink. If there is space that needs fill-\ning, we know of a good number of peo-\nple who could make that space glitter.\nThere is much being done in the\nEuropean and American Theatre week\nby week; but, strange as this may\nsound to some ears, it is not always\nto be found inside a playhouse.\nFor example, a book now and\nagain appears which does more to\nadvance the European Theatre than\ntwo years of energetic acting and pro-\nducing will do. Yet we hear nothing\nof this book,... or next to nothing. A\nfoolish conference is held, and it is re-\nported gravely. Or a new society for-\nmed, and reported as gravely. No dis-\ncernment is shown by the reports\ntwixt what is of value and what worth-\nless. This is a pity and a great waste\nof valuable space, time and money.\n11 Observer n will pardon this pre-\nsumption from the smallest serious paper\non earth to the largest and most im-\nportant;... but it is w The Mask's *\nspeciality, this little matter of Thea-\ntres. Like all specialists it thinks it\nknows. Who knows,... perhaps it may."}, {"page_pdf": 58, "page_imprimee": "52", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.58", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6831, "texte": "VENEZIA AND PROGRESS.\nTO judge from some recent articles\nin 44 The Manchester Guardian **\nand 44 The Daily Telegraph \" people\ndo not seem to realize in England that\nItaly is not a Museum or a Theatre,\nand that its Cities, however superb,\nhave no wish to crumble just to oblige\nthe tourists and the archeologists.\nItaly looks on it that life comes\nfirst, and all the rest comes after.\nAnd if electric motors are to be\nof any aid towards bringing to life\npart of Venezia or of any other city in\nItaly, what sort of being is it that will\ncry out about this? Venezia and the\ncities of Italy are not for him, they\nare for those who live and work and\ndie there.\n44 The Mask \" is all for the Arts.\nYou know that, we think. But only\nfor Art which comes along because a\npeople is alive. When a city is dead,\na nation drugged, a continent dulled,\nArt had better wait awhile in that\ncity, nation or continent.\nTrue, perhaps, that around some\ncities (did the Italian nation wish it)\na wall or a line might be drawn with\norders given that it was too good an\nexample of ancient work to be dis-\nturbed. Such a place might be roped\noff and put apart as a National Mo-\nnument, and outside its walls a new\ncity built. Inside its walls the very\nplainest but cleanest accommodation\nmight be provided for all who wished\nto study and work there in the monu-\nment, as in a vast Biblioteca, and\nspecial permissions granted to such on\nthat understanding. We have often\nfelt that cities like Venezia or San Gi-\nmignano might well be reserved for\nsuch a purpose.\nBut if the cities must be used, and\nmust be brought up to date, why not?\nWhere is Shakespeare's, Bacon's and\nElizabeth's London ? Has the loss of\nthat particular place (and lost it is)\nbeen no gain ? And if Titian's, Tie-\npolo's and the Doges* Venezia should\npass, where would be the loss ? To\nus, yes; to you, yes, to many thou-\nsands yes, ....but to many millions,\nprobably no. What use in architecture\nfor which the millions of people have no\ncare, which new laws no longer love ?\nGondolas are pretty boats, and to\nglide is sometimes a pleasant necessity,\nand a canal is not always as bad as\nit seems. But, since Shakespeare's Plays\nare not valued by us, Englishmen had\nbetter, we think, pause before too has-\ntily criticizing their Venetian friends.\nHow comes it that we English\ncriticize ?\nIs it just because we somehow be-\nlieve Venezia to belong to us, ....to be\nour honeymoon spot, our playground.\nAnd what are we ? a nation of\npeople more forward than any in prai-\nsing speed, electricity, cinema, liste-\nning-in ; ....and we quickly produce a\nmillion pounds if promised a safe in-\nvestment in something up-to-date and\na curse to everyone.\nIn Manchester we weakly give over\na poor cheap little National Theatre\nto a Cinema firm : with a lot of word\nprotest yet without real resistence, we\nyield it up; yet we have the audacity\nto tell Venezia from Manchester to keep\nitself unspotted from the monopoly for\nthe supply of motors.\nPrivate enterprise could have saved\nfor Manchester its Theatre Royal; and\nhad the 44 Manchester Guardian \" spo-\nken with the spirit it so often shows\nin other matters, (ie, in money matters)\nno commonplace motor-driven cinema\ncould have come into the Theatre\nRoyal.\nWhen Manchester can save one\nTheatre, and a grand old place like the\nTheatre Royal, it will be quite time\nenough for Manchester to lecture Ve-\nnezia.\n\nAS OTHERS SEE ....LONDON.\nJ. S.\nCAN anyone tell us what caused\nSir Alfred Butt or the Drury\nLane Committee to piace Mr Basil\nDean at the head of Drury Lane\nTheatre ?\nAccording to George Jean Nathan\nof New York, Dean would seem to\nbe a man of very- small talent, as\nthe following passage from an article\nin 44 The American Mercury \" will\nshow. Dean has been over in New\nYork producing plays. We want to\nsee a man put into Drury Lane who\nhas no time to go to New York or\nNewhaven to produce anything.\nNathan says that 44 It is not James\n44 Elroy Flecker's 44 Hassan \" that has\n44 failed, it is Mr Basil Dean's. Flecker\n44 wrote a play rich in the music of\n44 romance and poesy, as beautiful a\n44 thing of its kind as has appeared\n44 in recent dramatic literature; Dean\n44 staged it with all the imagination\n44 and rhythm of a sailor's smoker.\n44 The production, indeed, served as a\n44 piquant example of the low level to\n44 which the English stage, in this\n44 respect, has sunk. Dean is regarded\n44 as one of the best and most artistic\n44 of London producers, Over here,\n44 they do finer work up alleys.\n44 I have passed an eye over seven\n44 or eight of Dean's productions, three\n44 in New York and the others in\n44 England. All of them have been\n44 drolly incompetent. Not only has\n44 the gentleman apparently no sense of\n44 the dramatic, not only is he seeming-\n44 ly quite innocent of the technic of\n44 projecting a manuscript over the\n44 footlights, but he is, to boot, utterly\n44 without a sense of beauty and a\n44 sense of form. His ideas of scenic\n44 investiture go back to the day when\n44 furniture was painted on the back-\n44 drop and when a 4 big production *\n44 was any one in which the stage\n44 was so packed and crowded with\n44 scenery and irrelevant but costly\n44 props that the actors had to make\n44 their entrances from the wings side-\n44 ways. His ideas of lighting are so\n44 absurdly antiquated that even some\n44 of the most patriotic London re-\n44 viewers have difficulty in concealing\n44 their derisory hiccups. For Dean\n44 appears to believe that all that is\n44 necessary to achieve some exception-\n44 ally nobby illumination effects are\n44 a half dozen vari coloured gelatine\n44 slides supplemented by an indefati-\n44 gable fellow stationed at the dimmer.\n44 He sought to evolve mystery with\n44 a mere blue light and romance with\n44 a pink one. In the matter of dra-\n44 matic suggestion, he was equally\n44 unhappy. His scenes of melodrama\n44 were painstakingly languid ; his scenes\n44 of physical passion, as, for exam-\n44 pie, the one wherein the fair Yasmin\n44 conquers the flesh of Hassan, were\n44 as sexual as playing postoffice.\n44 Thus was a beautiful poem with\n44 its beautiful incidental music of Fre-\n44 derick Delius and with all its poten-\n44 tial stage wonder reduced to no-\n44 thing \".\nThis comes of being possessed of an\nability to push into Drury Lane with-\nout credentials. This comes of dis-\nhonest theatrical Criticism.\nLondon is slowly being made a\nlaughing stock by this sort of thing,\nand it is time the London Press said\nso clearly.\nUnfortunately Walkley, Archer,\nGrein and a few others do nothing to\nimprove matters. They either are cy-\nnical about our stage or gush about\nits worst elements. Not that Walkley\nor Archer err about playwrights; but\nto Theatricals they are sense-blind.\nGrein is not blind; he is merely ut-\nterly unfitted for a responsible positiou\nas a critic of our English Theatre."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c076", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c076", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "50", "page_fin": "50", "image_debut": 56, "image_fin": 56, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.16.2", "titre_corps": "THE ITALIAN THEATRE", "titre_sommaire": "THE ITALIAN THEATRE", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 56, "page_imprimee": "50", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.56", "debut_caractere": 18, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4062, "texte": "THE ITALIAN THEATRE.\nTHE old Italian Theatre, and by\nthat we mean its professional Thea-\ntre as it is today, pleases us so much\nthat, unless very fine innovations are\nmade, we would respectfully suggest\nthat it is perhaps better for the Ita-\nlians to avoid novelties.\nTheir Theatre is not the first in\nEurope because of the elegance and\ncomfort of its poltrone and its palchi\n(there England and America lead),\nnor because scenographically it is suf-\nficient, or because it is developing a\nnew group of excellent playwrights.\nIt is first by virtue of its first-class\nacting and singing, because acting and\nsinging come to Italians apparently with\nimmense ease ....not because of any\ncleverness, which after all is a very\nsmall thing at best.\nFirst they have a language; they\nknow how to speak it : they never\nmumble, drawl, are never foggy; all\nis crisp, deliberate, and rapid. They\nknow how to carry themselves ; they\nare born professionals; they 44 act\nthey do not pretend to deceive us\nthat they are 44 real \".\nYet while acting they never play at\n44 make believe \" ; they do not imi-\ntate toy soldiers and fashion plates and\nstatuary. While they are never unreal\nin that sense, 44 Realism \" has never\nbeen thinkable to them, for they know\nwhat is what, and find Realism as\nlaughable as they find forced arti-\nficiality depressing.\nThis it is which we think places\nall Italian actors in another sphere to\nthe actors of Russia, who are born\n*\nrealists and deuced serious about it all,\nor born copyists of statuary, engra-\nvings, wooden toys and the like. Ita-\nlian actors are not like German actors,\nwho are always earnest and clever but\nnever quite the thing. Certainly En-\nglish actors are the most gentlemanly\nin Europe; and French actors, ever\nthe neatest; but Italian actors are ac-\ntors before Abraham was,\nSo that when nowadays innovations\nare made in the way that the 44 Indepen-\ndenti the 44 Tetiteairo \" or T6thys-\nTheatre make them, or as Signor Bra-\ngaglia makes them, we regret to say\nthat they ring false. The 44 innovators \"\ndo nothing original.\nIt is all what we call rather cheap.\nWe have seen the designs for the\nnew 44 Teatro del Convegno \" and it\nstrikes us they are curiously poor.\nIf Italy possessed the knack for imi-\ntating northern nations, it would not\nhave waited twenty years to seize on\nthe notion used- now as an inn vation\nfor the new stage of the 44 Teatro del\nConvegno \".\nThe 44 Piccola Canobbiana \" de-\nsigns for stage machines and audito-\nrium and proscenium are no better.\nSironi's designs for 44 I cavalieri \"\nare influenced by northern notions but\nare not at all good.\nAs for Signor Bragaglia, he has\nmuch excellent energy, little judgment\nand no originality. He catches hold\nof all the notions he can find in the\nbooks of the last twenty-five years,\nand on a small stage he manages to\nhuddle them all together, bringing out\nmuch printed matter to announce their\nexistence. The whole effect is that of\na mis-fit. Of course he does not\nadmit where he has gathered most of\nthese notions : he seems to think that\nthey are public property. By thus using\nthem he becomes one of the public.\nWe don't like it a bit. Signor Bra-\ngaglia can, we feel sure, do better, ....or\ndo less. It's not at all worthy of the\nimmense tradition of the Italian stage.\nItalians have imagination, have always\nhad it. So that to echo and to copy\nis, in an Italian, very poor, and in no\nway represents the new spirit which\nhas inspired Italy to stand on its own\nmerits in all things, and which seems\nto possess enough force to last out the\ncenturies.\nThe Facist Theatre, when it comes,\nwill be one of the blossoms of this\nNew Italy which today has no time\nto turn to thoughts of blossoming, since\nits sole thought is the natural one, ....that\nof spreading roots.\nPlenty of time for the arts later on.\nInevitably those arts will blossom in\ntime. Meanwhile these sad attempts\nto 44 innovate \" in the grand Italian\ntheatre are rather ridiculous; and the\nnotion that the Italian spectators, are\ntaken in cannot be maintained for a\nmoment."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c077", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c077", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "50", "page_fin": "51", "image_debut": 56, "image_fin": 57, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.16.3", "titre_corps": "A POET'S THEATRE", "titre_sommaire": "A POET'S THEATRE", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 56, "page_imprimee": "50", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.56", "debut_caractere": 4064, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6652, "texte": "A POET'S THEATRE.\nMR John Masefield has built him-\nself a theatre at Boar's Hill, near\nOxford.\n\" What ridiculous nonsense \" is the\nverdict of those folk who cannot al-\nlow that a Theatre may be other than\nthe swagger Teatro Fenice in Venezia\nor the Prinz Regenten in Munchen.\nAs though Selva and Semper (or\nwhoever built the Wagner Theatre)\nare to be the only model husbandmen.\nWho knows better than a Dramatic\npoet what kind of Theatre is suited to his\nplays ? We understand that the Poetic\nDrama by several poets will be presented\nby Mr Masefield at his playhouse, which\nis a simply constructed building in his\ngarden, and is designed to accommodate\nabout one hundred persons. A first\nproduction has been already given, and\nafter Christmas it is hoped that an Eliza-\nbethan comedy may be produced. The\nstage is broad and sceneries are not\ngoing to be allowed to be a nuisance.\nOne London paper was cruel enough\nto say that 44 artistic curtains \" would\nbe used in place of the sceneries. As\na matter of fact we believe that Mr\nMasefield has around him a group of\ndisciples, not studying how to write,\nbut helping Mr Masefield how to play\nat theatres.\nAnd in our. opinion to play at Thea-\ntres in England is the very best thing\none could possibly do. And if in the\ncountry, the country wvay of doing this\nis ihe right way. That is why we\nutterly disbelieve the shocking suggestion\nof 44 artistic curtains Country thatch\ncountry wattles, country oak planks,,.,\nany of these as a background if you\nlike; there is danger in 44 artistic curtains \"\nthey are apt to catch fire. But then this\nwould assuredly bring Mr Masefield's\nplayhouse all the advertisement from\nwhich we think a country theatre should\nbe entirely exempt, but which the prac-\ntical man, even if he be in the desert,\nthinks is necessary.\nThe unfortunate fate of too many\na country playhouse is that it becomes\nthrough advertisement, just what the\npoet would hate it to be, ....what the\npoet never for a moment suspected it\nwas being lured to be; that is to say,\na bit of a sensation.\nWe recall the fate of several coun-\ntry, or semi-rural, playhouses, Before a\nyear was out someone (assuredly not\nthe Poet) had been over-energetic;\n(that 4 practical * person over again) it\nhad been dragged or pushed up to\nLondon, where it played a while and\nwent out, puff, like a lamp.\nWhy, after having chosen a noble\nrural spot as the place of places for\na Theatre, a dash should be made at\nthe first chance for London, is puzzling.\nGoethe, who played with Theatres,\nplayed with a real playhouse ....in\nWeimar.... with a Court as well as"}, {"page_pdf": 57, "page_imprimee": "51", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.57", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2958, "texte": "the towns-people as spectators. He\nworked hard at this playhouse of his,\nand it was even less than the poodle\nyou will remember which caused his\ndownfall as Theatre Director. It was\neven Fraulein Caroline Jagemann.\nAnd there have been other poets who\nfor a time have had little playhouses.\nVoltaire had one at Ferney. Here,\nabout 1776, Lekain stopped for some\ndays to perform to a select and ap-\npreciative audience. At Cirey, too,\nVoltaire had a playhouse of his own :\nand some years earlier had one in his\nvilla at Vernier, but we never hear of\nhim suddenly carrying his charming if\namateur troupe to Paris or Berlin.\nWe have not seen any drawings or\nengravings of these Theatres, but in\n1772, (about the time of the Ver-\nnier theatricals) it was customary to\nbe too magnificent rather than too\nsimple. The playhouse was a word\nwhich stood for something with style,\na sparkle of swagger in it. The poet\nAlbergatti liked things to look well-\ndressed, and so his theatre in Zola\nnear Bologna was the very thing. A\nlittle bit of a village this same Zola,\nbut then a big piece of a Chateau,\nand in the Chateau some Teatrino\nas Mr Stein would say, to seat three\nhundred people. And the poet Pe-\npoli.... how many theatres he built in\nhis houses in Venezia and Bologna\nand in his villas at Codalunga and\nelsewhere has net yet been decided.\nBut it is on record that he not only\nhad his own plays and those of other\npoets performed in them, but also\noperas in prose and ballets, in which\nPepoli danced, 44 the best dancer of\nthem all \" says the historian.\nBut of all private country theatres\nthat at Esterhaz, where Haydn lived\nfor many years writing his divine things\nfor the only quite divine performers....\nfor marionnettes.... is the country thea-\ntre we like to think of most. Haydn\nand Masefieid would have got on well\ntogether, we believe. What a pity\nthat the old Count Esterhazy of those\ndays is no more among us to show us\nall how.... exactly how.... a country\ntheatre should be set before the King :\n—or rather before himself and his\nhousehold. But as he is not with us,\nand as no lord seems to have retained\nthe old tricks that lords once played,\nwe must be content when a poet or\nany other artist rigs out a theatre for\nhimself. It's not the thing to do;...\n' Art for Art's sake' is no fun at all;\nand theatre for theatre's even less: but\nwhat would you ?... when a poet is\nat the same time a grand Signore he\ncan do these things as some of us\nthink they should be done ; when he\nhas only his crown of laurels, even if\nhe do them better, he cannot do them\nas they should be done.\nMr Masefieid will do them like a sim-\nple English poet, and that means he will\ndo them just as well as they can pos-\nsibly be done ; and those of us who\ncannot be there, will feel envious of those\nwho can, and who will hear beautiful\nverse spoken as it should be spoken.\nSee plate 2 and Page 35 for some\nidea of what a little private Theatre\nmeant in the 28th centmy, Ed."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c078", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c078", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "51", "page_fin": "51", "image_debut": 57, "image_fin": 57, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.16.4", "titre_corps": "VALUELESS NEWS", "titre_sommaire": "VALUELESS NEWS", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 57, "page_imprimee": "51", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.57", "debut_caractere": 2960, "fin_caractere_exclue": 7058, "texte": "VALUELESS NEWS.\nTHE Observer in its issue for No-\nvember 2nd. had an exceptionally\nfunny twenty-five lines about a Berlin\nTheatre. Here it is : —\nEVEN BERLIN SHOCKED.\nTHE DRAMATIC THE A TRE\nCOMES TO GRIEF.\nThe movement of a few enthu-\nsiasts to help forward the great band\nof unacted dramatists has received a\ncrushing blow. The new \" Dramatic\nTheatre \", which opened with every\nencouragement from the critics, and\nwhich produced George Kaiser's (t Bil-\nles and Jeanne \" as its first venture,\nhas since alienated every type of au-\ndience by a succession of extravagant\nplays violating all canons of good\ntaste even in so exceptionally broad-\n-minded a city as Berlin.\nThe result is a triumph for the\nwatchful Clerical Centre party, whose\nmembers have their own theatre league,\nbut needed their own house. While\nthe Social-Democrats support their own\nexcellent '' People's Theatre *which\ncarefully avoids plays of reactionary\ntendency, the tf Dramatic Theatre \"\nhas now become the home of the po-\nlitical Catholics, whose taste in drama\nis characterised not so much by pro-\npaganda as by elimination. This rules\nout, for instance, not only three-cor-\nnered problems, but divorce in its\nentirety. This is a triumph for the\nideals of the Centre, which would pass\nunnoticed in a Catholic province, but\nis a sign of its renewed activity in\nBerlin.\nq What foolery and what cliches !\nReally, it is time to ask even this\nwell-nigh perfect journal to make a\nscrap of its Foreign Theatre Correspon-\ndents and start afresh.\nFor some time we have studied\ncarefully the theatrical news sent to\n44 The Observer \" from Wien, Berlin,\nand Budapest; and have wondered how\nlong Mr Garvin would let it go on.\nWhy is foreign theatrical news\nnecesary to 44 The Observer unless\nit be either very entertaining or very\ninforming ?\nWe suppose that the only people\nwho feel the necessity are those who\nare ever active in informing London\nthat the North European Theatre is\nquite the most important upon earth.\nHundreds of English actors doubt-\nless read 44 The Observer \", but they\nwill surely not be impressed by the\nnonsense which week after week is\nsent from Wien, Berlin and Pest.\nFor example what the dickens is\nthere of interest in this twaddle from\nBerlin about some Theatre which is\n44 the home of the political Catholics \"\nand \" whose taste is characterised by\nelimination \" ? And how comes it that\nthis or any taste 44 rules out \" divorce\nin its entirety, and how is this 44 a\ntriumph for the ideals of the Centre \" ?\nAnd then, 44 Catholic province 44 re-\nnewed activity 44 watchful clerical\ncentre party \", 44 broadminded city of\nBerlin\".—Really, 44 Observer \" ! you\nwho are the very pride of journalism\nand our delight, to accept such Pro-\npaganda from the Theatre of Elimi-\nnation in Berlin is not what you came\ninto existence to do. To hear from\nWien or Budapest that an audience\nhas sat spellbound, or that one could\nhave heard a pin drop, hardly carries\nas far as London.\nBesides, what Austria and Germany\ndo in Theatres is not half as important\nas the good 44 Observer\" seems to\nthink. If there is space that needs fill-\ning, we know of a good number of peo-\nple who could make that space glitter.\nThere is much being done in the\nEuropean and American Theatre week\nby week; but, strange as this may\nsound to some ears, it is not always\nto be found inside a playhouse.\nFor example, a book now and\nagain appears which does more to\nadvance the European Theatre than\ntwo years of energetic acting and pro-\nducing will do. Yet we hear nothing\nof this book,... or next to nothing. A\nfoolish conference is held, and it is re-\nported gravely. Or a new society for-\nmed, and reported as gravely. No dis-\ncernment is shown by the reports\ntwixt what is of value and what worth-\nless. This is a pity and a great waste\nof valuable space, time and money.\n11 Observer n will pardon this pre-\nsumption from the smallest serious paper\non earth to the largest and most im-\nportant;... but it is w The Mask's *\nspeciality, this little matter of Thea-\ntres. Like all specialists it thinks it\nknows. Who knows,... perhaps it may."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c079", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c079", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "52", "page_fin": "52", "image_debut": 58, "image_fin": 58, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.16.5", "titre_corps": "VENEZIA AND PROGRESS", "titre_sommaire": "VENEZIA AND PROGRESS", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 58, "page_imprimee": "52", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.58", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 3388, "texte": "VENEZIA AND PROGRESS.\nTO judge from some recent articles\nin 44 The Manchester Guardian **\nand 44 The Daily Telegraph \" people\ndo not seem to realize in England that\nItaly is not a Museum or a Theatre,\nand that its Cities, however superb,\nhave no wish to crumble just to oblige\nthe tourists and the archeologists.\nItaly looks on it that life comes\nfirst, and all the rest comes after.\nAnd if electric motors are to be\nof any aid towards bringing to life\npart of Venezia or of any other city in\nItaly, what sort of being is it that will\ncry out about this? Venezia and the\ncities of Italy are not for him, they\nare for those who live and work and\ndie there.\n44 The Mask \" is all for the Arts.\nYou know that, we think. But only\nfor Art which comes along because a\npeople is alive. When a city is dead,\na nation drugged, a continent dulled,\nArt had better wait awhile in that\ncity, nation or continent.\nTrue, perhaps, that around some\ncities (did the Italian nation wish it)\na wall or a line might be drawn with\norders given that it was too good an\nexample of ancient work to be dis-\nturbed. Such a place might be roped\noff and put apart as a National Mo-\nnument, and outside its walls a new\ncity built. Inside its walls the very\nplainest but cleanest accommodation\nmight be provided for all who wished\nto study and work there in the monu-\nment, as in a vast Biblioteca, and\nspecial permissions granted to such on\nthat understanding. We have often\nfelt that cities like Venezia or San Gi-\nmignano might well be reserved for\nsuch a purpose.\nBut if the cities must be used, and\nmust be brought up to date, why not?\nWhere is Shakespeare's, Bacon's and\nElizabeth's London ? Has the loss of\nthat particular place (and lost it is)\nbeen no gain ? And if Titian's, Tie-\npolo's and the Doges* Venezia should\npass, where would be the loss ? To\nus, yes; to you, yes, to many thou-\nsands yes, ....but to many millions,\nprobably no. What use in architecture\nfor which the millions of people have no\ncare, which new laws no longer love ?\nGondolas are pretty boats, and to\nglide is sometimes a pleasant necessity,\nand a canal is not always as bad as\nit seems. But, since Shakespeare's Plays\nare not valued by us, Englishmen had\nbetter, we think, pause before too has-\ntily criticizing their Venetian friends.\nHow comes it that we English\ncriticize ?\nIs it just because we somehow be-\nlieve Venezia to belong to us, ....to be\nour honeymoon spot, our playground.\nAnd what are we ? a nation of\npeople more forward than any in prai-\nsing speed, electricity, cinema, liste-\nning-in ; ....and we quickly produce a\nmillion pounds if promised a safe in-\nvestment in something up-to-date and\na curse to everyone.\nIn Manchester we weakly give over\na poor cheap little National Theatre\nto a Cinema firm : with a lot of word\nprotest yet without real resistence, we\nyield it up; yet we have the audacity\nto tell Venezia from Manchester to keep\nitself unspotted from the monopoly for\nthe supply of motors.\nPrivate enterprise could have saved\nfor Manchester its Theatre Royal; and\nhad the 44 Manchester Guardian \" spo-\nken with the spirit it so often shows\nin other matters, (ie, in money matters)\nno commonplace motor-driven cinema\ncould have come into the Theatre\nRoyal.\nWhen Manchester can save one\nTheatre, and a grand old place like the\nTheatre Royal, it will be quite time\nenough for Manchester to lecture Ve-\nnezia."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c080", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c080", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "52", "page_fin": "52", "image_debut": 58, "image_fin": 58, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.16.6", "titre_corps": "AS OTHERS SEE ....LONDON", "titre_sommaire": "AS OTHERS SEE ....LONDON", "signature_source": "J. S", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 58, "page_imprimee": "52", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.58", "debut_caractere": 3390, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6831, "texte": "AS OTHERS SEE ....LONDON.\nJ. S.\nCAN anyone tell us what caused\nSir Alfred Butt or the Drury\nLane Committee to piace Mr Basil\nDean at the head of Drury Lane\nTheatre ?\nAccording to George Jean Nathan\nof New York, Dean would seem to\nbe a man of very- small talent, as\nthe following passage from an article\nin 44 The American Mercury \" will\nshow. Dean has been over in New\nYork producing plays. We want to\nsee a man put into Drury Lane who\nhas no time to go to New York or\nNewhaven to produce anything.\nNathan says that 44 It is not James\n44 Elroy Flecker's 44 Hassan \" that has\n44 failed, it is Mr Basil Dean's. Flecker\n44 wrote a play rich in the music of\n44 romance and poesy, as beautiful a\n44 thing of its kind as has appeared\n44 in recent dramatic literature; Dean\n44 staged it with all the imagination\n44 and rhythm of a sailor's smoker.\n44 The production, indeed, served as a\n44 piquant example of the low level to\n44 which the English stage, in this\n44 respect, has sunk. Dean is regarded\n44 as one of the best and most artistic\n44 of London producers, Over here,\n44 they do finer work up alleys.\n44 I have passed an eye over seven\n44 or eight of Dean's productions, three\n44 in New York and the others in\n44 England. All of them have been\n44 drolly incompetent. Not only has\n44 the gentleman apparently no sense of\n44 the dramatic, not only is he seeming-\n44 ly quite innocent of the technic of\n44 projecting a manuscript over the\n44 footlights, but he is, to boot, utterly\n44 without a sense of beauty and a\n44 sense of form. His ideas of scenic\n44 investiture go back to the day when\n44 furniture was painted on the back-\n44 drop and when a 4 big production *\n44 was any one in which the stage\n44 was so packed and crowded with\n44 scenery and irrelevant but costly\n44 props that the actors had to make\n44 their entrances from the wings side-\n44 ways. His ideas of lighting are so\n44 absurdly antiquated that even some\n44 of the most patriotic London re-\n44 viewers have difficulty in concealing\n44 their derisory hiccups. For Dean\n44 appears to believe that all that is\n44 necessary to achieve some exception-\n44 ally nobby illumination effects are\n44 a half dozen vari coloured gelatine\n44 slides supplemented by an indefati-\n44 gable fellow stationed at the dimmer.\n44 He sought to evolve mystery with\n44 a mere blue light and romance with\n44 a pink one. In the matter of dra-\n44 matic suggestion, he was equally\n44 unhappy. His scenes of melodrama\n44 were painstakingly languid ; his scenes\n44 of physical passion, as, for exam-\n44 pie, the one wherein the fair Yasmin\n44 conquers the flesh of Hassan, were\n44 as sexual as playing postoffice.\n44 Thus was a beautiful poem with\n44 its beautiful incidental music of Fre-\n44 derick Delius and with all its poten-\n44 tial stage wonder reduced to no-\n44 thing \".\nThis comes of being possessed of an\nability to push into Drury Lane with-\nout credentials. This comes of dis-\nhonest theatrical Criticism.\nLondon is slowly being made a\nlaughing stock by this sort of thing,\nand it is time the London Press said\nso clearly.\nUnfortunately Walkley, Archer,\nGrein and a few others do nothing to\nimprove matters. They either are cy-\nnical about our stage or gush about\nits worst elements. Not that Walkley\nor Archer err about playwrights; but\nto Theatricals they are sense-blind.\nGrein is not blind; he is merely ut-\nterly unfitted for a responsible positiou\nas a critic of our English Theatre."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c081", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c081", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "n. p.", "page_fin": "160", "image_debut": 59, "image_fin": 72, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.17", "titre_corps": "ON A DESIGN BY SANGALLO AN INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM", "titre_sommaire": "ON A DESIGN BY SANGALLO AN INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM", "signature_source": "J. S", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 59, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.59", "debut_caractere": 23, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1201, "texte": "ON A DESIGN BY SANGALLO\nAN INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM.\n\nIN our last two Symposiums we invited the Actors, Managers and\nCritics to the table. This time we invite the Architects, Designers\nand Scholars.\nThey are more bashful and so respond with rather less rapidity\nthan did the performers and the critics. But we believe that the few\nanswers will prove of considerable interest to our readers, all of whom\ncan suggest solutions to the difficult problem for themselves.\nWe think that most of the writers have come to a solution\nbut for us the matter still remains unsolved.\nA PRELIMINARY NOTE ABOUT THE DESIGN.\nTHIS design is by Antonio San Gallo the Younger (1485-1546) and is\nreproduced for the first time from the original drawing in the Uffizi Library\nin Firenze.\nI It is for a Theatre, showing the stage, scene and spectators seats.\nThe special thing which has concerned the artist is a revolving triangular scene for\neach side of the stage.\nWhat exactly was this scene to do or what it do. It looks to us like\na bit of a puzzle, and for this reason interesting.\nWas the triangular scene raised up above the ospitii or rooms ? Was it behind\nthem ? If behind, where did it show ?"}, {"page_pdf": 60, "page_imprimee": "152", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.60", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2836, "texte": "Was the front side of the Ospitii a transparency ?\nOr was there hung a square of cloth in front of the two top portions of the\nospitii which, when raised, revealed which ever side of the triangle was turned to\nfit the opening left exposed ?\nThe square opening indicated on the left side of the scene suggests the later notion.\nThe date of the drawing, about 1515 to 1530, makes it worth while studying.\nFor Palladio was but born in 1518 dying in 1580 and did not erect his\nfirst stage until 1565, and not till 1 545 did Serlio's second Book of Architecture appear\nwith its scenic section : only in 1 539 did he build his wooden Theatre in Vicenza.\nThis San Gallo (for there were six in all) is supposed to have assisted Raf-\nfaello and Bramante, both of whom concerned themselves with the questions of scenes,\nmachines and stages. Is this perhaps some record of Raffaello's work in Rome ?\nAmong San Gallo's contemporaries in scenic work were Peruzzi, Aristotile,\nGenga and Pericoli.\nVitruvio's book had appeared for the first time about 1486—one year after\nSan Gallo's birth : so this is an early document. Miss Campbell in her admirable\nbook \" Scenes and Machines \" (1923) does not mention it or its designer.\nScholars and artists will note several interesting points besides the two revolving\ntriangular scenes.\nWE therefore put the following questions :\n1. How were these triangular side scenes used ?\n2. Can anyone say for what play ?\n3. Were there but three scenes on each triangle or were others attached as\nthe play progressed,—ie. a new one for each \" ascione \" or \"action\" or scene?\n4. Is this the artist's sketch for work to be done, or is it a record by the artist\nof work he had seen done ?\nBesides answers to these questions we invited any additional information or\nsupposition no matter how extravagant. Without dashing in with a guess or two,\nhow arrive at any solution of what seems to be one of the most interesting\nexamples of the use of triangular side scenes.\nWE also felt it would be of interest to other students if one or two answers could be\ngiven on the following points :—\n(IB) What were the ospiiii and why so called ?\n(2B) Why was the place for the spectators called Teatro and not the whole building?\n(3B) What is the foro and why on the plan does it take such space? How was it!\nused ?\n(4B) Have we aula regia correctly translated ? was it a fixed scene fit for tragedy ? —\nor what was it ?\nTHE ANSWERS.\nBRUNO BRUNELL1. (Cortina d'Ampezzo).\n1. I hold that the triangular \"machine \"\n~~ geared behind the \" ospitii \" through an\nrture which was opened every time the\nHb. \\\naction required it, as appears from the perspec-\ntive drawing of the stage right hand side. The\nposition in which the \" macchina \" appears\non the left side must be a schematic simpli-\nfication to make plain, by means of the draw-\n\nJ. S."}, {"page_pdf": 61, "page_imprimee": "153", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.61", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4143, "texte": "ing, where it was to be inserted: it must\nhave been supported by a pivot at the height\nof the first piano of the \" ospitii \". It cor-\nresponds in this sense also with the other de-\nsign in the ground-plan, at the left side of\nthe stage (a triangle set in a square).\n2. 1 believe it is impossible. At the\nvery most the indication of the \" aula regia \"\nmay lead us to presume that it served for a\ntragedy.\n3. It is probable that only three scenes\nwere painted, as it is indicated that the\n\" macchina \" served for each \" ascione \" or\nscene.\n4. The notes which accompany the de-\nsign lead rather to the supposition that these\nwere jottings made by Sangallo subsequent\nto some performance at which he had been\npresent.\nIB. The \" ospitii \" seem here like small\nstages ( palcoscenici) upon which took place\nazioni complimentary to the principal azione ;\nperhaps allegorical azioni. Elsev/here, on\nthe contrary, (for example in the illustrations\nof an edition of Terenzio which 1 have in\nmy library, but have not the possibility of\nconsulting here) they appear rather as pal-\nchetti, platforms, reserved for honoured guests.\n2B. The \" aula regia \" in tragic plays\nwas the part of the stage reserved to the\npersonages of royal lineage : it is also a remin-\nder of the Greek theatre, which had the\nporta regia in the permanent scene—a thing\nwhich the classic theatre often reproduced\namong us ; (see the Teatro Olimpico).\nThe back of the stage was, on the con-\ntrary, reserved for the populace, and the\nrepresentation for which this stage served left\nevidently a large part to the masses.\nJOHN MASEFIELD. (OxfoTd).\n1. They revolved upon some central pole,\nlike the merry-go-round. I made a little mo-\ndel to prove this. You can get charming\naffects by such means. The scene at the\nback may have remained the same, or may\nlave been changed by simply raising and\ndropping, in the usual way.\n2. No doubt someone can, and will.\n3. There is no limit to Italian invention:\n3r other genius.\n4. Artist s jottings of something very good\nwhich he could do better, or thought he could.\n1 B. Tiring chambers, which looked like\nbuildings, and were used as such when the\nplay demanded.\n2 B. The spectators \" go to the theatre \",\nthe actors to the stage.\n3 B. All magnificence should be ample,\nThis was the setting for the plays of the con-\ntemporaries of Michael Angelo, who were\nmuch concerned with the right use of space,\nor as they called it, \" with the art of de-\n»#\nsign.\n4 B.... ?\nFRANCOIS M. FLORIAN. (Lucerne).\nMy dear Mr John Semar,—you ask too\nmuch. You would like me to make a fool\nof myself or a historian, or a pedant. Do\nhonour to the imagination of man or at least\nto his fancy, and do not ask us to be lear~\nned about what no one can know. Our fancy\nis so nimble you know.\n1 have no doubt that this good Antonio\nSan Gallo scribbled down hundreds of such\nlittle notions as the one in your design. Raf-\nfaello did the same. Aristotle San Gallo,\nAntonio s father or uncle or nephew (what\nmatter which) did the same. Peruzzi, Sab-\nbattini, Chiaramonte, Bramante, Genga- (see\nwhat a lot of names I know), Pericolo (molto!)\nLa Cecca (ah), Lancia, Buontalenti, Baldi\nProfondavalle ....how many thousands of such\nlittle sketches aod scribblings must they have\nlet fly from their wrists into the air. Where\nare they all now ? Still flying in the air ? I\nsuspect! How catch them all, get them all\ninto their right order again? ...!and once in\norder how then fill in those gaps which\nthe men when living talked, filling in with a\nword or two here, a word or two there.\nTo rebuild an old wall exactly as it was\nyou have to collect all the old stones. Col-\nlect them then if you can ....but don't forget\nthe mortar or whatever else served to join\nthem. And when putting them together try\nto get them each in his old place, so as to\nget the wall to look as it really looked. Then\ngive 150 years of time and may be you'll\nrecover the old beauty.\nBut have you ever yet seen this done, or\nhave you perhaps seen a picture of it ? I fear\nthat's all you can ever see or hope to see,\nI fear you can never reconstruct an old wall\nprecisely as it was and as for an old idea,"}, {"page_pdf": 62, "page_imprimee": "154", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.62", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4235, "texte": "you need a lot of humbug to join its dis-\njointed notions, as the bricks need a lot of\nold mortar.\nAh what folly your pretty plan exposes.\nYou solemnly set out to ask twenty or thirty\nwise men to explain what is beyond explana-\ntion, to reconstruct, plus common sense, this\nfunny notion by the good Antonio. And the\nten or twelve will respond—solemnly: and\nyou will as solemnly print their \" conclu-\nsions \".\nBut you have done a good thing through\nyour folly. You have once again proved how\nimportant it is that artists of 1925 shall create\nafresh, shall go ahead, do any wild thing,\nmad thing, rather than that maddest of things,\nreconstruct.\nYou have made it clear for the hundredth\ntime, that to waste time wondering what it\nwas they did in 1525 or 1825 may be a\ngood waste of second rate time, but is an\nabominable waste of first rate time. First\nrate time is the day, the hour, the moment\nof the artist. Waste him and his hours and\nmoments, and you and your nation are playing\nthe fool. He is nimble and he is gifted by\nthe Gods, and you run a grave risk in not\nasking him to be himself, to invent ever new-\ner things for everyone. Let him remain\nyoung since he has a young mind and spirit *,\nlet him go ahead; let him sow seed; let\nhim amuse himself that way since he enjoys it.\nEncourage that in him—and reap the harvest.\nAnd now as I shall be in Koln next week\nI shall go and study for a few days at the Thea-\ntrewissenschaft Institute at their University—\nfor 1 very much doubt the entire truth of\nwhat I have written here.— Perhaps a little\nsuffering in the Institute will make it clearer.\n° W. R. LETHABY. (London). O\nForo I suppose was the Roman Forum,\nAula Regia was rather the Basilica or Pu-\nblic Hall in the Forum than a Royal Palace.\n1 suppose spectators looked through the Ba-\nsilica into the Forum beyond. It would seem\nto have been a classical Roman play in which\n\" the Gods \" appear.\nMay not the hospitalia be Inns ? A Ro-\nman theatre was a semicircle with a scene,\nin adopting the word in the middle ages\nthe curved part may have been the theatre\nproper. The opitio (?) on left seems to have\nan open room ( camera) on upper floor and\ntwo windows on exterior below; also door\nbelow on left of centre. The right hand one\nhas two external windows in each floor. The\nbig flag-like thing 1 suppose is one side of\ntriangular revolving scenes: similar one shown\nsmaller on right in position ? That is raised\nhigh ? Three scenes on revolving triangular\nframes are well known. They allowed three\neasy changes and possibly more if loose pain-\ntings were hung up over the first lot.\n0 GORDON CRAIG. (Genova)~o\n1. I haven't the faintest idea—and I shall\nbe very surprised if anyone else is able to\nspeak with authority. It is the only drawing\n1 know of where triangles are used\nanother scene.... for obviously they revolved\ninside those side ospitiishowing though the\nupper part of the face of the side scenes.\nBut everyone can see this : — I can suggest\nnothing new. A god or a saint appears sur-\nrounded by clouds and seraphs as in the„old\nbox of tricks revealed by Furtenbach, Padre\nBrueil and others.\n3. If a thing can go round like this trian-\ngular affair it certainly would tempt many a\nscenic man to make use of the fact and put\nnew scenes on it on each revolution. — but\nItalians of that day wouldn't.\n4. I think it is a record of something seen\non a stage,—the sketchy drawing suggests\nthis and the artist's notes make it more\nevident\n1 B. What are \" Ospitii \" ? I have no\nnotion ....places for the actors to wait and\nrecover in ?\n2B. Teatro was a place to see a show\nin and a semicircle seems to have been pro-\nved best for seeing from—whereas a full cir-\ncle or an oval was best for hearing in and\nan Odeo was made so.\n3 B. This Foro has always puzzled me, and\nI have come across no explanation which is at\nall illuminating. Was it a place built out in\nfalse perspectives—built of thin wood and\nplaster and not to be approached by the per-\nformers, ....not a \" practicabile \" ? I imagine so.\nThe spectators in those days, were but only\nprinces and men of taste, but were by no means\nprejudiced against a bit vof unnecessary sce-\nnery. The acting and singing were perfect,\n— had to be — so if Raffaello, Peruzzi or"}, {"page_pdf": 63, "page_imprimee": "155", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.63", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4234, "texte": "San Galio wished to build up some imitation\nForums or Palaces, why not ? No one would\nnote them beyond their worth. No one would\nfail to note them and their worth. A per-\nformance was then looked on as a delight, to\nsee and to hear.\nNot display, either in voice or trappings,\nbut style was the thing. The critics praised\nthe first rate in terms of the first rate,—and\nDemocracy had not at that time made itself\nunsafe for the whole world.\nHORACE WYNDHAM. (\n1. Possibly as a \" strong post \", behind\nwhich an inferior company of players might\ntake shelter from angry critics and disappoin-\nted members of the audience.\n2. This looks to me like an ambitious ef-\nfort to dramatise one of the earlier books of\nEuclid, as a \" Great Triangular Drama \" or\n\" Problem Play\n3. This depends. Really economical ma-\nnagers would probably have only one scene\nthroughout, labelling each act \" the same\n4. Probably a sketch for work which the\nartist hoped he would persuade an adventu-\nrous manager to produce.\nALFRED MORTIER. (Paris).\nThe drawing or sketch which you attri-\nbute to Antonio di San Gallo has very much\ninterested me. Here are the thoughts that it\nhas suggested to me.\nLet us first examine the manuscript text,\nwhich accompanies the sketch. On certain\npoints my interpretation differs from yours.\nInstead of facivevano I read facieoano. But\nthat is unimportant, the sense remaining the\nsame. Instead .of \" come dicie di tre\nsorte \" which you translate exactly by \" as I\nsaid of three kinds \", I propose to read: si\nfacieva varii adornamenti comedici e di tre\nsorte.\nComedici is an ancient word, which has\ndisappeared from the Italian language, but\nwhich is derived in direct line from the La-\ntin comoedicus and signifies \" relative to the\ncomedy \".\nThe sense which I propose seems to me\nclearer, more accurate and more plausible.\nWill you note, in fact, that the version \" come\ndicie\" (as I said) relates to nothing, since\nSan Gallo has not spoken at all before of\nthree sorts of ornaments (1).\n\" Secondo la materia \" signifies quite\nobviously \" according to the material of the\ncomedy \"; that is to say, according to the\ndecorative requirements necessitated by the\nsubject of the piece, according to the scene,\nthe place, where the action passes ; and can\nsignify, in addition, according to the nature\nof the subject-matter, for you are not una-\nware that there were already, at the time of\nBaldassare Peruzzi, three types of decors, di-\nstinguished, one from another, as the comic,\nthe tragic, and the satiric or pastoral.\nFinally, you translate \" aula regia \" by\n\" Royal palace which seems to me not\nvery exact, and which could lead the stu-\ndent into error. The aula is, originally, an\ninterior court yard usually surrounded by co-\nlumned porticoes. If you look attentively, on\nSan Gallo's sketch, at the part which I have\ndesignated on my plan by the letters M and\nN, (2) you will see that, in M especially,\nSan Gallo has slighty indicated some co-\nlumns standing out from the facade of the\nbuilding and consequently forming a portico.\nAnd, at the foot of these columns, he has\nwritten in \" aula regia \", thus clearly in-\ndicating that this part of the scene, bordered\nby colonnades on the two sides of the stage,\nconstituted the aula, or royal court flanked\nby palaces.\nFurther on, beyond the aula, is seen the\nperspective of the scene which San Gallo calls\nthe Foro. Here an alternative presents itself:\nmust we understand by Foro any public place\nwhatsoever, or more especially the Roman\nForum ?\nThe question is of importance. Were it\na matter of the Roman Forum, that would\nlocalize the researches and permit us to de-\nduce that this scene was destined for a play\nthe action of which was laid at Rome. From\n1510 to 1530 these pieces are not numerous;\nI for my part know only the \" Amicizia \"\nof Jacopo Nardi, and the \" Tullia \", a tra-\ngedy by Lodovico Martelli, whose action\ntakes place at Rome. Later, in 1546, there\nis the Orazia by the Aretine and, before that,\n\n(!) An Italian scholar tells us that the leaflet we re-\nproduced evidently followed on from something else, as it\nbegan in the middle of a sentence; so there is no know-\ning what may have preceded. (Editor).\n(2) As in our \" key \" plan. See Plate 12. (Editor)."}, {"page_pdf": 64, "page_imprimee": "156", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.64", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4551, "texte": "in 1542, the Talanta by the same author;\nbut the scene of the Talanta was constructed\nand painted by Vasari, who speaks of it in\none of his Letters.\nFor these reasons I hold that, by Foro,\nSan Gallo meant to signify some place (pub-\nlic square) whatsoever of a city, showing\nthe vista of its streets and houses, as usually\ndone in his times.\nIn conclusion, it would be also well to\ndefine with exactitude the expression \"ed\nera cosa (or perhaps casa, which would be\nmore precise) posticcia \", which you have\ntranslated by the somewhat vague term of\n\" constructed thing \", but of which the true\nsense would be \" factitious thing that is\nto say a \" chose factice \", which signifies\na house actually constructed. We must not\nin fact forget that, in the earliest days of\nstage scenery,... until 1535 at least,... the pa-\nlaces and houses on the stage were solidly\nconstructed in wood ; it is only later that Ser-\nlio advises replacing the solid wood with can-\nvas painted and fixed upon frames as is still\ndone today.\nSan Gallo takes care, then, to specify\nthat the two lateral \" ospitij \" are not to be\nconstructed, but that they are \" cosa postic-\ncia '*; that is to say, capable of being remo-\nved or replaced easily and at will. (2) That\nis why I consider that you have been right\nto add \" moveable\", and 1 reply to your\npoint of interrogation: *' Yes, Sir, certainly\nmoveable \".\nWhy \" moveable \" ? For a very simple\nreason; which is that, after the death of Gi-\nrolamo Genga, his pupil Baldassare Lancia\nor Lanci of Urbino (1510-1571), and also\nAristotile di San Gallo who was — let us note\nthis important detail—the uncle of our An-\ntonio di San Gallo, began to establish gira-\nting scenery decors.\nThe \" Ospitij \" of which San Gallo\nspeaks are thus made of painted canvas fixed\nup on frameworks, and consequently light and\neasily \" moveable \", so as to obtain some\n\" changements a vue \".\nIn his treaty on \" Perspettiva pratica \"\n(Roma, Mascardi 1644) on page 91, Jacopo\nBarozzi da Vignola speaks at length, and\ngives a design, of the system of the -\nments a vue. And, like our San Gallo, he\ndescribes the triangular apparatus used to\nthis end, turning on a central pivot.\nHe recalls (2) his memories: at Castro, at\nthe Duke Pierluigi Farnese's, the scene changed\ntwice, and was constructed by Aristotile di\nSan Gallo. At Florence, likewise, in 1569,\nat the \" Palazzo ducale \" the scene changed\nseveral times, and the decors were made by\nBaldassare Lanci d' Urbino, of whom I have\nspoken above.\nLet us note in regard to this an interesting\ndetail. Towards 1542 Aristotile di San Gallo,\nwithout employment, goes to Roma to his\nnephew Antonio di San Gallo, to seek work;\nfor Antonio held a good position there in\ndecoration and architecture. It is in the fol-\nlowing year (3) that Aristotile repairs to Castro\nto execute the rotating scenery of which I\nhave spoken above. It is possible that the\nnephew may have shown the uncle his draw-\nings and his ideas about the girating scene.\n5|C *\nLet us now examine attentively the sketch\nof Antonio di San Gallo.\nThe drawing A presents no difficulty.\nIt is a prismatic chassis (framework), a prism\nturning on a pivot. According to Barozzi da\nVignola, each face of the prism was painted\nwith a different subject or view. Here it\nseems that each face of the prism may have\nbeen surrounded by a frame, and that it had\nsome slight depth, so as to afford place for\none or more actors ; in short, a veritable little\nscene, and not merely a flat painted surface.\nIn fact, in his commentary, San Gallo says :\n\" Perche in ogni facia a varij li efetti doe in\nuna Vaparitione delli dei etc....\nIf an apparition, god, goddess or phantom,\ncan find place there, that means that the little\nscene has depth; but necessarily a very re-\nstricted depth, on account of the other faces\nof the prism. That matters little however,\n\n(1) Opere di Vasari, Firenze, 1882 pg. 284).\n(2) Serlio expressly says that the ospizia were origi-\nnally of massive wood, and they were such in 1513 at\nUrbino for the Calandria, the decor of which was made\nby Gerolamo Genga. (Editor).\n(1) In our copy only A triangular affair is described*\nNot this one. Another sort altogether. {Editor).\n(2) We are under the impression that it is Dr Ignazio\nDante, the commentator of Vignola, who remembered and\nrecords these two performances. His edition of Vignola\nappeared in Rome for the first time in 1583, followed by\n4 later editions in 1602, 1611, 1683 (Bologna) and 1743.\n(Venezia). See Haym 1773. {Editor).\n(3) Letter of Claudio Tolomei of June 27 1543."}, {"page_pdf": 65, "page_imprimee": "157", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.65", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4283, "texte": "for an apparition generally remains motionless\nand does not need much space as do the\nactors who come and go. Thus the prismatic\nscene suffices perfectly for its function.\nWe now come to the enigmatic question\nof the manoeuvring of the apparatus.\nThis is my interpretation, founded not\nupon hypotheses but solely on the most care-\nful examination of the San Gallo design of\nwhich you have failed to perceive an impor-\ntant detail, which to my mind illumines the\nwhole working. (I)\nAt the outset and normally the \" ospitij\nare free, because they serve as coulisses for\nthe actors who come on or go off the stage.\nWe have seen this system practised in our\ndays by Max Reinhardt(2>, who, having sup-\npressed the ancient portants forming a coulisse,\nreplaced them by some constructions, not\nsuspecting, probably, that his intended novelty\nwas some centuries old.\nBut here it is that, owing to the exigencies\nof the drama or action (per ascione), the\nmachinist wishes to utilize the macchina (fi-\ngure H) (3) or prismatic apparatus.\nFor the moment this \" macchina \" is si-\ntuated in what we call the \" cintres \" of the\ntheatre, or, to be clearer, in the upper struc-\nture, that high part invisible to the spectators.\nThis upper part of the theatre was perfectly\nadapted for the preparation up there of all\nthat was required. Barozzi da Vignola(4)\n(op. cit. p. 91) relates that he has seen the\nsky open and that \" there appeared in the\nair a great number of men in the form of\ngods, who sang and played a delicious music,\nand at the same time a cloud descended\nunder their feet, which covered in the whole\nscene \".\nConsequently the \" macchina \" H was, if\nnecessary, equipped with its scenery up there.\nThe <f macchina \" H could rise and des-\ncend at will, supported by its central pivot,\nexactly like one of our modern lifts. When\nit was high up, the actors of the piece had\nthe free use of their \" ospitio which tra-\nversed only the stock of the lift. When H\nhad to descend, the actors withdrew from the\nospitio so as not to be crushed.\nAt the desired moment, and planned\nfor example, for the apparition of the gods, H\ndescended. When once H was at the bottom,\nthe ospitio G mounted to the flies, like the\ncover of a box which one lifts up.\nIn your questions you ask: Was the trian-\ngular scene behind the ospitii or rooms ?\nI reply : no, and I prove it. Will you\nlook on my plan (figure BCDE), at the little\ntriangle E (2). You will there perceive a detail\nwhich has escaped you, and which San Gallo\nhas indicated on his sketch. The triangle is\nset in a square.\nThe square is the \" ospitio \", a structure\nwhich, indeed, possesses its four sides, as\nhere: unless it be that, on the back side, in-\nvisible to the spectator, there is an empty\nspace permitting the angle of the triangular\nprism to exceed the line, as the drawing of\nSan Gallo clearly indicates.\nYou then ask : was there hung a square\nof cloth in front, etc....\nAnd I conclude : no, not a piece of stuff\nbut a veritable cage, which covered and hid\nthe triangle until the moment when the cage\nwas hauled up into the air and allowed the\ntriangle be seen.\nThus the ospitio was not transparent.\n* *\nHere then is my reply to your question\nNo. I.\nTo question No. 2, (\" Can anyone say\nfor what play ?) I am incompetent to reply\nand have not the time to make the necessary\nresearches. All that I can say is that the\npiece is a tragedy since the scene takes place\nin an aula regia.\nNo. 3. Nothing would prevent the adjust-\nment, during the course of the piece, of other\ndecors to the triangle, since two sides of it\nwere always invisible to the spectators.\nNo. 4. San Gallo's drawing seems to me\nto refer to a past work which he has seen,\nfor he says : \" si facievano, fingevasi.... donde\n\n(1) How happy we are to have left so much for our\nguests to tell us at this gathering we need not say. We\nare honoured to see them at our table and to hear them\nexchanging their views—differing or agreeing and in this\nfriendly spirit. {Editor).\n(2) It had been practised in England in 1900 before\nProf. Reinhardt adopted it a few years later (Editor).\n(3) See Plate 12. (Editor).\n(4) We believe it is Dr. Ignatio Dante who relates\nthis, not Vignola (Editor).\n(1) i. e. decorated or stage-set.\n(2) Triangle indicated E on our key plan. (Editor)."}, {"page_pdf": 66, "page_imprimee": "158", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.66", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4244, "texte": "uscivano etc.... Had it been a question\nof a present work or one to be prepared, he\nwould have written: \"si fanno, fingonsi.... ;\nor else.... \" si faranno, etc.... \".\n* * ❖\nFurther Remarks.\nI am surprised that San Gallo's design\nis dated from 1515 to 1530. (1) Lacking any\nformal and documentary certitude 1 hold it\nto be later, the date being given us when\nAristotile di San Gallo made use of the trian-\ngular scene and the changement a at\nCastro.\nThe great square opening to which you\ndraw attention in the ospizio F on the left\ndoes not seem to me seriously to weaken my\ntheory. I doubt whether this was an ope-\nning, for such opening would have allowed\nthe ascent and descent of the triangular lift\nto be seen, and would have consequently\nbeen opposed to the purpose of the ospitii,\nwhich were destined, on the contrary, to\nhide the lifts.\nThis square seems to me to be a kind\nof balcony, but closed at the bottom in such\na way as not to let the interior be seen.\nFinally I draw your attention on my dia-\ngram to the lines L and L, which do not\nfigure on your \" Key to the design but\nwhich exist on the original design, and which\nare the lines of perspective of the triangle (2).\n«£• of*\ncr^m\nDear Sir.\n1 add some observations to my letter of\nyesterday.\n1° In observing, on the design by San\nGallo, the prismatic apparatus raised to the up-\nper part of the theatre (figure H in my plan) (3)\none notes that it is furnished with a frame.\nIt is, then, actually a little scene—and thus\nthis apparatus differs from the flat painted\nsurface mentioned by Barozzi da Vignola.\nMoreover one perceives two indications\nwhich represent, according to me, two per-\nsonages. Iis the head and Yis the body.\nY head.\nThis personage, a god or an apparition,\nis indicated in a yet clearer fashion in the\nenlarged apparatus (2) (figures A on my plan),\nshowing the right arm raised, the left arm\nbent. It seems to appear in the middle of a\nlandscape of rocks. (3)\n2° I add likewise that if aula signifies\n\" cour interieure (interior court) or peristyle,\nit may equally mean \" Salle d'un palais \"\n\" Saloon, hall, of a palace\", and in the pre-\nsent case it is this latter sense which ought\nto prevail, for San Gallo expressly states\n\" fingievasi una sala \".\nOne may then ask oneself what the back\nof the decor or Foro represented; for if the\naula regia represents a closed salle, the back\ncan no longer represent the perspective of a\ncity, habitually painted in the XVI century.\nThere is here a little difficulty to resolve.\n3° El parato ? I think that by this word\nmust be understood the decorated part of the\ntheatre (la partie decoree du theatre), the\nconstructed part (partie construite) as opposed\nto the merely painted perspective.\nA. M. NASALLI-ROCCA. (Ptacenz4\nIn any case I can tell you at once that the\nverbs used in the past tense make me think\nthat Sangallo was treating of a representa-\ntion seen by him. It would be well to make\nhistorical researches.\n1. It seems from the design that the la-\nteral triangular scenes were used to change\nthe picture with the greatest celerity at each\nchange of action or ascione, such as the an-\ncient \" pieces \", comprising a succession of\nsomewhat complex events, often called for.\n2. It is not possible to say for what\nplay without making precise and accurate re-\nsearches regarding the activities of Antonio\nSan Gallo.\n3. The interesting machine, which must\nhave worked a perno (pivot-wise) on the\nospitii, was evidently invented for a special\nplay in which there was to be a rapid ap-\n\n(.1) We dated it so, recalling that in 1515 Giorgio\nVasari made machines for the performances at the'Court\nof Tuscany. The triangle was the most obvious of all\nmachines and employed since the time of Augustus.\n(2) We had observed these and took them to be\ncurved lines and too troublesome to put in by type. We\ntook them to represent a dome and a figure on top, or\neven clouds turning the square into an oval. Who knows ?\nDr. Mortier's explanation seems to us better. (Editor).\n(3) See our \" key plan, Plate 12. (Editor).\n(1) See the part indicated by H, Plate 12. (Editor).\n(2) See figure A, in key plan. (Editor):\n(3) Strange, but to us the figure seems to be surroun-\nded not by rocks but by four angels or saints. (Editor)."}, {"page_pdf": 71, "page_imprimee": "159", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.71", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4452, "texte": "parition of Olympian Gods. This rendered\nnecessary the rapid transformation of the\nscene. There could be three fixed scenes as,\non the other hand, there could be others set\nor hung over these when the play so required.\n4. It is more probable that the artist may\nhave planned a machine and a scene adapted\nto a particular play rather than have recorded\na work already accomplished, because in this\nlatter case there would perhaps be more am-\nple and definite theatrical details.\n1 B. It is certain that the ospitii were the\nrooms set apart for the actors; and they ap-\npear evidently to be such, both from their\nposition at the sides of the scene, and from\nthe inscription which accompanies the sketch\nattributed to Sangallo il giovane. I believe\nthat the name of ospitii derives from the analo-\ngous denomination in use in the Greco-Roman\ntheatre which, precisely at the sides of the\nstage, had the galleries destined to receive\nand shelter the actors and Theatrical pro-\nperties.\n2B. The Teatro in the past was gene-\nrally the stable part of the building destined\nfor spectacles, and precisely that defined by\nthe place for the spectators and the cavea.\nThus, in the design, the part denominated\nteatro, with the accessory space destined for\nthe orchestra, and the other given over to the\nconstruction of the scena (stage). The scena\nwas in fact an addition ; moveable, and added\nlater; and evidently did not form part of the\nteatro as built, but was only like a joined-on\nstructure.\n3 B. The foro is the usual place destined\nfor public gatherings and does not appear to\nhave any special significance\" in our pre-\nsent case. If it is held, as appears, that the\ndrawing relates to a particular work, it is\nevident that in the representation of the scenic\nsetting there must have been a foro, but whe-\nther Greek, Roman, Fantastic-mythological,\ndoes not matter. In the matter of the di-\nmensions the sketch has no pretensions to\ntechnical exactness ; and, on the other hand,\nit being necessary to give a proportion, the\nforo had to be more ample than the Aula\nRegia.\n4B. Aula Regia is right in so far as it\nshould relate to a definite scene for a parti-\ncular work which required the representation\nof a regal hall with a view through an open\nbackground on to the Foro.\nALLARDYCE NICOLL. (London)-\nIn connection with the exceedingly inte-\nresting early XVI century drawing which has\nbeen kindly sent to me I should like to make\na few remarks both on the MS text and on\nthe plan itself.\n1. Although I am not a palaeographer I\nam inclined to question some of the reading\nof the MS. Lines 5 and 10 of the first pas-\nsage are clearly doubtful; I should suggest\nthat the word 44 parato \" in the former should\nbe read 44 parete \" and that 44 e dera cosa\npostitia\" should be read 44 aveva cosa (or\n' cosi ') posti tre \". The \"u\" of the word\nI take to be \" aveva \"is not unlike the 44 u \"\nin the first word of the passage, while the\n\"tre\" is very similar to the \"tre\" in the\nlast line of all. The translation would then\nbe as follows :\n\" Aula regia and the hospitalia were\n\" made on the proscenium which we call the\n4 wall * and a sala was simulated and at\n\" each side an ospitio or room whence the\n\" actors came forth. This had 3 stations so\n\" that according to the subject matter various\ndecorations were given, as I said, of three\n<< 1 •J »»\nkinds .\nIt seems to me that this gives a better\nsense to the whole passage.\n2. While the drawing, judging from the\npast tense of the verbs, is not a design for a\nperformance not given, 1 question whether it\nreally represents an Italian theatre. If this\ndrawing be compared with the fanciful Ro-\nman theatre given in the Jocundus edition of\nVitruvius (1513) a startling similarity will be\napparent. The \" teatro \" is simply a trans-\nlation of the Greek @£axpov (from ©saa&at\n4 to see ') in its original sense of 4 the audi-\ntorium '. In Vitruvius we get the hospitalia\nat each side and in the middle the valvae\nregiae, corresponding to the aula regia here.\nFinally, at the rear of the stage is a square\nodeum which would be the equivalent of the\nforo in the drawing. As regards the triangulate\nmachina, Daniello Barbaro has a note in his\nedition of Vitruvius which may serve as a\ncommentary :\n44 Vtrunque aliae portae erant concharum\n\" modo, quas Nichios dicimus, ita pro fronte\n44 scenae tres erant apertiones, ante quas in\n44 singulis machinae erant collocatae triangu-\n44 lares axibus versatiles, in singulis earum"}, {"page_pdf": 72, "page_imprimee": "160", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.72", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1871, "texte": "\" frontibus picturae erant secundum fabularum,\n\" quas agebant, opportunitatem. Nam in una\n\"comica scena, pro Comoediis, in altera tra-\n\"gica pro tragoediis, in tertia satyris designa-\n\" batur. Vertebantur illae facies, & ab illis ma-\n\" chinis Dii loquebantur\nMay this drawing not be an attempt to\nsketch out a reconstruction of the early stage\nas that stage was known to the groping Re-\nnascence theorists ?\nSEN. CORRADQ RICCI. (Roma).\nI could tell you various things which I\nthink respecting the drawing by Sangallo, but\ndo not find that I can write them, as drawings\nwould have to be made and perhaps a little\nmodel would also be necessary. If you have\noccasion to come to Roma, or I to Firenze, it\nwill be well to meet and discuss it. It seems\nto me an interesting thing.\no JACK B. YE AT S. {Ireland), o\nI have no knowledge of these things but\nwould suggest a Chinese origin.\nFERDINANDO MASSAI. {Firenze).\n1B. Ospitii, (see to , that is to\nlodge, receive, take into one's house, refer-\nring to persons from without; Vocabulary of\nthe Crusca :) were the rooms which received\nthe actors before and after they had performed\ntheir part. Today they are called \" camerini\".\n2B. A rhetorical figure: naming the part\nfor the whole.\n3B. \" Forum is the name given to the\npart at the back of the stage\": the word\nis taken from Vitruvius, etc. \" thus wrote\nA. M. Salvini in his Annotations upon the\n\" Fiera \" of Michael Angelo Buonarroti.\n4B. Aularegia, in the theatre, is the most\nconspicuous place which represented in the\ndramas the royal scenes. Tommaseo Bellini.\n(Dizionario della lingua italiana).\nI do not believe that one can translate it\nin English as \" Royal Palace \".\nAMONG others invited to take part in this\nsymposium, but who have written to say\nthey felt incompetent to help us to a solu-\ntion, were Dr Cesare Levi, Mr Lennox\nRobinson and Mr George Jean Nathan. Ed."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c082", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c082", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "n. p.", "page_fin": "n. p.", "image_debut": 68, "image_fin": 68, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.17.1", "titre_corps": "A DESIGN BY ANTONIO SAN GALLO IL GIOVANE (1485-1546)", "titre_sommaire": "A DESIGN BY ANTONIO SAN GALLO IL GIOVANE (1485-1546)", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 68, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.68", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 182, "texte": "A DESIGN BY ANTONIO SAN GALLO IL GIOVANE (1485-1546) SHOWING DEVICE FOR A\nTRIANGULAR SCENE FOR A THEATRE,\nfrom a hitherto unpublished design in the Uffizi Library, Firenze.\nPlate 11."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c083", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c083", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "n. p.", "page_fin": "n. p.", "image_debut": 69, "image_fin": 69, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.18", "titre_corps": "A KEY TO THE SAN GALLO DESIGN AND MS", "titre_sommaire": "A KEY TO THE SAN GALLO DESIGN AND MS", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 69, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.69", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1195, "texte": "A KEY TO THE SAN GALLO DESIGN AND MS.\n\nItalian : Aularezio e li ospi | talia si\nfacivevano | in sul proscienio que j llo che\nnoi diciamo | el parato e fingieva | si una\nsala e da ogni | canto uno ospitio | overo\nCamera don j de uscivano li recitanti j e\ndera cosa postitia perche | secondo la ma-\nteria si facie | va varii adornamenti | come\ndicie di tre sorte. I\nEnglished literally :\nRoyal palace and the hospitalia (or\nroom) made on the stage that we call the\nparato (apparatus f decors f) and represen-\nted a sala and at each angle an ospitio or\nroom whence the actors came forth and it\nwas a constructed thing (moveable f) because\naccording to the effect of the play (*) there\nwere made various adornments as 1 said\nof three kinds.\n(*) doubtful.\nItalian '. Triangulare | machina quale j\nsi gira secondo li | efetti della Comedia |\nperche in ogni facia | a varij li efetti cioe |\nin una laparitione | delli dei | nel atra un\naltro atto | nelaltra uno ato.\nEnglished literally :\nTriangular machine which turns accor-\nding to the effects of the comedy because\non each side it has different effects ; that\nis, in one the apparition of the gods in the\nother another act in the other another act."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c086", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c086", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "n. p.", "page_fin": "n. p.", "image_debut": 69, "image_fin": 69, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.18.3", "titre_corps": "[Illustration sans titre]", "titre_sommaire": "[Illustration sans titre]", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 69, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.69", "debut_caractere": 1212, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1221, "texte": "Plate 12."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c087", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c087", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "160", "page_fin": "160", "image_debut": 72, "image_fin": 72, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.19", "titre_corps": "SPONTANEOUS VULGARITY OR EVERYONE HIS OWN KING", "titre_sommaire": "SPONTANEOUS VULGARITY OR EVERYONE HIS OWN KING", "signature_source": "J. S", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 72, "page_imprimee": "160", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.72", "debut_caractere": 1873, "fin_caractere_exclue": 3829, "texte": "SPONTANEOUS VULGARITY\nOR\nEVERYONE HIS OWN KING.\nJ. S.\n-mi—nmiiwiii II in I Mil iiinwium HI 11111111 mn—TBHIBI ■ IIMJULUJILJ\nWE have often said that the two most\nbackward Theatres of Europe are the\nParisian and the London stages.\nTheatres like dogs grow to be like their\nmasters, and the London and Paris theatres\nhave preferred to have as masters their public\nrather than their best artists.\nFor years they have made themselves ri-\ndiculous grovelling before these masters instead\nof ridding themselves once and for all of such\nstupid tyrants. \" What the Public wants we\nwill give that is the heroic phrase of these two\ntoadies.\nAnd whenever we have derided this\npair of Europeans Pantaloons their paid watch-\ndogs have given out a howl of righteous\nindignation.\nRead this extract from one of the biggest\nof English dailies, recording better than we\ncould ever do the precise level to which the\nFrench and English Theatre world has gone\ndown.\nHere is the immortal passage : —\n\" At the Theatre Frangais the other eve-\nning, Alfred de Musset's \" Fantasio \" was\ngiven before an audience comprising, as usual\nat this time of the year, a considerable pro-\nportion of English-speaking visitors.\n\" In the second act, one of the characters\ndiscusses travel and observes that he might\nhave gone to London to see what the English\nwere like, but he preferred to save himself\nthe trouble, as they all came to Paris.\n\" These sentiments were highly appre-\nciated by the English spectators, and they\nimmediately broke into a round of ap-\nplause \".\nWhen in past ages a King or an Em-\nperor visited the Theatre and some line in\nthe play could be taken as an allusion to the\nadmired monarch, an audience would some-\ntimes rise up and applaud; —it is never on\nrecord that the King rose up and applauded\nhimself.\nBut what would you have? — To-day\nevery true democrat is his own King; — how\ncharming then, since there is no one to ap-\nplaud him, that he should applaud himself."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c088", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c088", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "161", "page_fin": "162", "image_debut": 73, "image_fin": 74, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.20", "titre_corps": "ENGLISH ACTORS AND ITALIAN ACTORS. A COMPARISON", "titre_sommaire": "ENGLISH ACTORS AND ITALIAN ACTORS. A COMPARISON", "signature_source": "UMBERTO FRACCHIA", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 73, "page_imprimee": "161", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.73", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4157, "texte": "ENGLISH ACTORS\nAND ITALIAN\nACTORS.\nA COMPARISON\nBY UMBERTO FRACCHIA.\nUMBERTO FRACCHIA writer, is drama-\ntic critic of the journal \" II Secolo\nis editor of the magazine and\nis courageously spreading the reforms which\nshould reconduct the Italian theatre to the\nperfection of its origins and its traditions.\nAs a Writer of a delicate and exquisite\nimpressionism, his two novels, II Perduto\nAmore \" (the Lost Love), and \"Angela and\nthe recent volume of tales, \" Piccola genie di\ncitta \" (Little people of the city) set him\namong the most prominent of the younger li-\nterary men, and in direct reaction from the\nnarrative literature of the period which we\nmight call d'Annunzian.\nTo his daily work as critic he brings the\ndefinite characteristics of a personality which\ndoes not simulate, which knows how clearly\nto distinguish and separate art from what is\nnot art. The pretentious and tenacious obsti-\nnacies of the old dramaturgs, the like igno-\nrance of the scenographers, the base specula-\ntions of the capocomici, ...the actor-managers,\nand of the trade-like actors, find in him an\nenemy; while every intelligent young worker,\nand all the courageous and go-ahead innova-\ntors have in him the most faithful of allies.\nHis very face, the face of an adolescent sur-\nmounted by a precocious > inspires\ntrust and diffuses an encouraging serenity which\nsays very little and does very much.\nRaffaello Calzini.\nENGLISH ACTORS AND ITALIAN.\nSOME time back, while carrying out for my\npaper (I) an enquiry into the conditions\nof the dramatic theatre in the principal nations\nof Europe, I had the opportunity, during a\nbrief stay which I made in London, to com-\npare the English actor, with whom I was\nwholly unacquainted, with the Italian actor,\nall of whose good qualities and all of whose\ndefects I know thoroughly well. I have not\nbeen able to pursue my studies in this matter\nvery deeply. Hence I am the first to recog-\nnize that, in speaking of the English actor,\nI shall not be able to pass any judgments,\nbut merely to give my \" impressions \", leaving\nto the reader, more expert than I, the task\nof correcting my probable errors.\nThe English actor has above all a \" style\nwhich the Italian actor lacks. He seems to\nignore the genial improvisations which are the\nnatural product of a nature extraordinarily\nsubject to the gusts alike of the true and of\nthe false passions. The lack of \" dramatic\ntemperament \" which, according to us people\nof the south, is inherent in the English race,\nmakes itself felt also in the theatre. It is thus I\nexplain how it is that the English actor, who\nseemed to me excellent in acting comedy,\nfarce, pantomime and classic tragedy, appeared\nto me somewhat cold, colourless, and meagre\nin expression in the interpretation of the\nmodern drama. But this defect is also con-\ntributed to by the \" School \", which I believe\nis a \" high school \" for all, and which perhaps\nderives from the special social education\n.pertaining to certain classes of the English\nnation. The dress, the bearing, the gesture,\nthe tone of voice, of the leading actor and\nof the leading actress are not noticeably\ndistinguishable from those of the lowest super\nwho comes to the front of the stage to speak\nthe single line of ten words which constitutes\nhis whole part.\nA correct, measured, easy naturalness, the\nmechanical foundation of which only the\nmediocre actors disclose, while the better\nones know how marvellously to conceal every\ntrace of study and of effort, constitutes exactly,\nin my opinion, the \" style \"of the English\nactor. It is not the disordered, unequal and\nfrequently even discordant spontaneity of the\nItalian actor, and it is not the elegant but man-\nnered stylization of the French actor. It is a\nquid medium between these two extremes.\nCertainly, on the English stages, bad actors\nare also to be met with; but some small degree\nof style exists equally in all, be they good or\nbad :—a sign that all obey one and the same\nrule.\nI have also noted, (and whoever knows\nthe habits of the Italian actor will not be\nsurprised by this observation of mine) that all\n\n(1) 14 Comoedia *\\ a fortnightly illustrated Journal of\nthe Theatre, Milano."}, {"page_pdf": 74, "page_imprimee": "162", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.74", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 3195, "texte": "keep themselves strictly within the limits of\nthe part assigned to them. The perfect sub-\ndivision of work, which characterizes the\nEnglish people in other fields and which\nconstitutes its great strength, is evidently\nobserved also upon the stage.\nGive an Italian actor of some merit a part,\nbe it but of modest dimensions, in which he\nhas the opportunity of displaying his own\npowers, and, at the opportune moment, (which\nis almost always inopportune) you will see\nhim seek by every means to attract to\nhimself the attention of the public, usurping,\nfor a moment or so, the place of the leading\nactor and creating for his own personage,\nhowever insignificant it be, the illusion of\nbeing for that moment the protagonist of the\ndrama.\nIt does not, on the contrary, seem to me\nto be one of the habits of the English actor\nto overcharge or distort his part for love of\ntheatrical effect. I did not chance, for example,\nat the entrance alone upon the stage of a\nleading actress, to see that which is normal\nin Italy,—an emptiness, a truly \" splendid iso-\nlation left around her instantly as though\nshe were suddenly mounted upon a pedestal\nand the others were but poor pigmies at her\nfeet.\nIn yet stronger contrast with this correct\ndiscipline, and with the measured naturalness\nto which I have referred already, are the\nexcesses, exorbitant even for us who know\nthe volcanic dramaticity of Grasso and the\nclamorous comicality of Musco and of Petro-\nlini, to which the English actors attain in the\ndrama of adventure of the type of that \" Good\nLuck \" which was represented during the past\nyear at Drury Lane, and in classic farce, as\nin \" The Merry Wives of Windsor \" which\nat that time was being performed by a Shake-\nspearean company at the Golders Green\nHyppodrome. It was in fact a revelation to\nme to see with how much unrestrained brio\nthere unfolded before my eyes, accustomed to\nthe timid—(timid through a too great respect) —\nItalian interpretations of the same comedy, the\ngay adventures which set forth the Garter Inn,\nthe streets, and Windsor Park (l). A work\nwhich I had until the previous day considered\narchaic appeared to me all at once as extraor-\ndinarily alive, thanks to the overpowering and\nbroad comicality of its interpreters. In like\nmanner as the English actors adopt this spe-\ncial method in the classic farce of Shake-\nspeare does the Italian actor change in style,\nin manners, in customs, when he acts Goldoni.\nIn conclusion, I consider that our Italian\ntheatre lacks a good scuola di plotone, while\nthe English theatre would perhaps be benefitted\nby a course of individual exercises.\nThe Italian actor can boast a greater\nwealth of natural gifts, a greater ductility and\nelasticity of talent, a more sensitive and im-\npassioned nature. The English actor can\nboast in his turn the superiority which derives\nfrom a disciplined study, from a more cons-\ncientious respect for his art; and, above all,\nfrom the habit of reciting without a prompter\nwhich gives him an extraordinary mastery of\nhimself and of his own resources.\n\n(1) Until Miss Ellen Terry came to show English\nactors how to unloose the comedy and make it alive it\nhad been just as timid in our land. (Editor)."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c090", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c090", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "162", "page_fin": "162", "image_debut": 74, "image_fin": 74, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.21", "titre_corps": "THE PROMPTER", "titre_sommaire": "THE PROMPTER", "signature_source": "E. G. C", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 74, "page_imprimee": "162", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.74", "debut_caractere": 3197, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4358, "texte": "THE PROMPTER\nE. G. C.\nIT may slrike Italian students of the Theatre as strange\nthat my appreciation of the work done by the Italian\nPrompter has increased not lessened.\nI remember once listening to an early rehearsal of an\nItalian Company. I heard the Prompter giving each word.\n\" Then it comes automatically and easily into the ear of\nthe actor \" I thought; \" what a blessing! He has not\nto think ; — all he needs to do is to feel. What a release\nfrom an incubus I thought. Hamlet is there on the\nstage. The ghost appears. He does not know what he\nwill say — and slowly his ear hears the words afar off\nand yet tiny and close in his ear. Angels and ministers\nof grace.... defend us.... why, it is one of the great\nblessings of the Italian stage; it was an inspiration on the\npart of who ever first thought to invent this Prompter.\nDoubtless it was the Dramatic Poet who was the first\nPrompter — and I see no reason why he should not\ncontinue to perform this part of his task.\nAnd this — this wonderful aid to spontaneity — is the\nfigure il Gran Signor Pirandello and others will have\nremoved, so as to save the stage !\n\" Angels and ministers of grace defend us"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c092", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c092", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "163", "page_fin": "166", "image_debut": 75, "image_fin": 78, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.22", "titre_corps": "UNIVERSITIES AND THE DRAMA A REPLY BY PROFESSOR ALLARDYCE NICOLL", "titre_sommaire": "UNIVERSITIES AND THE DRAMA A REPLY BY PROFESSOR ALLARDYCE NICOLL", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 75, "page_imprimee": "163", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.75", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4196, "texte": "UNIVERSITIES AND THE DRAMA\nA REPLY BY PROFESSOR ALLARDYCE NICOLL.\nIT is far from my wish to quarrel with the\naims and intentions of The Mask, a pe-\nriodical which I, as everyone who is truly\ninterested in the drama, most heartily admire\nand honour.\nAt the same time, there are three paragraphs\nin the recent (July) number which seem to\nme to demand some comment, the more espe-\ncially as two of them are directly inspired\nby my own article in the last issue.\nI refer to Mr. C. G. Smith's letter on\np. 143, to the Editorial Note,— Drama not\nTheatre—on p. 144, and the other note—\nBritish Opera—on p. 150.\nIn many ways, everyone will agree with\ncertain points raised by Mr. Smith. Undoubt-\nedly \" theatricals \" can be carried too far in\na university, and, moreover, \" theatricals\"\nare not fundamentally theatrical at all. It is\nunquestionably bad for students who have a\nliving to make to be led to imagine that they\nare budding Hamlets, and the inglorious (and,\nbe it whispered, on occasions mute) Hamlets\nof College productions can hardly be said to\nhelp on the work of the drama. So far\nMr. Smith, the writer of the Editorial Note\nand I agree. There come now the further\nassumptions that only \"young gentlemen\" go\nto the University and that there is no use in\nstudying the \" laws \" of drama. In the first\nplace, conditions have vastly changed from the\ntime when Collegio this or Collegio that built\ntheatres for its students in XVIII century\nItaly. I can say from experience that the\nmajority of my students have had to deprive\nthemselves of many things before they could\nattend the College classes and all of them\nhave had to think with due seriousness of\nbread and butter questions when they took\ntheir degrees. Secondly, there seems to be\nsome sort of confusion concerning the vital\nquestion of study of the drama and of the\ntheatre. Why does The Mask print va-\nluable plans of Rome and of Paris? Why\ndoes it present to its readers engravings and\ndrawings of by gone theatres? Why does\nit delve into the musty records of the past?\nBecause Mr. Gordon Craig, one of our most\ndistinguished creative artists, knows that inspi-\nration for future endeavour may come from these\nrecords. Surely this is a task which a University\nmay well perform? By studying intensively the\ndocuments of departed centuries, by collecting\ntogether all available materials, by providing\na centre of information on these subjects a\nUniversity may well make itself an integral\npart of the great body theatric.\nPerhaps my views may be clearer if I set\ndown a concrete instance. At East London\nCollege in the University of London I am\nstarting in October (and I trust Mr. Smith\nwill aid me) a School of Dramatic Study\nand Research. This School will not appeal\nprimarily to ordinary undergraduate students;\nit will not exist for the purpose of '' training\nyoung gentlemen in the crafts of the stage \";\nit will not indulge in amateur theatricals.\nOur appeal will be to the acting pro-\nfession and to the student of the theatre.\nWe shall engage in research work such as is\nso ably presented in the pages of \" The\nMask \".\nWe shall endeavour to make the results of\nthat research available by talking of the va-\nrious periods of dramatic literature (treating\nthe drama as drama and not as poetry), of\nthe theatrical art of past times, of the con-\nceptions of drama in past ages, of the latest\nmovements in the international world of the\nTheatre.\nThe Theatre cannot \"be a little world\nby itself for the Theatre belongs to huma-\nnity, and perhaps the Universities may have\nsomething to give to it which the artistry of\nthe theatre will transmute into gold.\nIn announcing this new School of Drama\nin The Mask, I wish therefore to note that I\ndo not wish to train the \" young gentlemen \"\nstudents to be actors, or scene-painters, or\ncostume-designers, or producers. My aim —\nand this I think should be the aim of all\nUniversity departments of this kind — is to\nprovide a cultural centre which may in its\nown way (however slightly) improve the con-\nditions of the theatrical world. It is only the\nlesser and the unsuccessful artists who cry out\nabout the sanctity of art and the contamina-\ntion of scholarship. Your Leonardo da Vinci"}, {"page_pdf": 76, "page_imprimee": "164", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.76", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4301, "texte": "and your Dante and your Milton never made\nthat mistake.\nWhile amateur theatricals will not be in-\ndulged in at this new centre, revival of un-\nknown works of the past and performance of\nnew works will form part of the activities of\nthe School. If professional actors and actres-\nses, aided by professional artists and produ-\ncers, co-operate, there seems to be no reason\nwhy a University should not provide the\ncentre for an \"experimental\" theatre. The\nordinary theatrical work in London is hope-\nlessly commercialised. Commercialism of a\ngood sort is, of course, not to be despised\nin the stage world; Shakespeare gave us\nHamlet and Moliere gave us Les Femmes\nSaoanles under those conditions. But the\ncommercialism in the theatre of today is not\nof the right sort; it is parasitic and art-quel-\nling.\nSurely then, there is reason to welcome\nany endeavour which strives, not to curb the\nartist, but to give him the opportunity of de-\nveloping and improving his art ?\nWith these general remarks on the Uni-\nversities and the drama, I should like to make\none comment on the British Opera.\nNo one could be more eager to see\nPurcell on the stage than I, yet one must\never remember that art, especially the art of\nthe theatre, is international.\nThe British National Opera Company is\nan endeavour to create for London a centre\nof interpretative artistry such as Berlin and\nVienna and Paris already possess.\nTo limit the B.N.O.C. to the performance\nof all British seems to me unduly\ninsular.\nSurely a National Theatre, if that ever\ncomes into existence, would not refuse to\nplay Ibsen or Moliere or Goldoni any more\nthan a Continental theatre, nationally supported,\nwould refuse to play Shakespeare or Sheridan ?\nI must apologize for occupying so much\nspace in the pages of The Mask. I have\nhad to write at length because I think there\nhave been misconceptions all round, because I\nbelieve that the theatre can thrive only when\nit is regarded by all in an international spirit,\nand because I look confidently to the suppor-\nters of The Mask and to lovers of the theatre\nsuch as Mr. Smith for encouragement and aid\nin my effort to establish a centre for real dra-\nmatic and theatrical study in London.\nMR. C. G. SMITH'S REPLY\nTHE Editor of \" The Mask \", having\ncourteously shown me an advance proof\nof Professor N icoll*s letter relating to my own\nin the last number, enables me to reply with-\nout delay to some of his points and to make,\nif necessary, yet clearer what I then wrote\nregarding \" University and Drama\nProfessor Nicoll announces the imminent\nestablishment of a school for the study of\nthe art of the theatre at the East London\nCollege.\nThis, in some ways, is an excellent plan.\nIt will not, it is true, be able to train actors\nor make artists, but it can ultimately develope\ncriticism and produce critics; and that is\nsomething.\nBut why does Professor Nicoll take ex-\nception to what he calls my \" assumption \"\nthat \" only ' Young gentlemen * go to the Un-\nversity \" ! why does he seem to slight the old\nEnglish notion that young gentlemen have still\nsome sort of claim though gentlemen ? He\nsays that \" conditions have vastly changed \".\nBut surely conditions have never changed,\nnever can change, to such an extent that a\nCollege education will aim, even if at times it\nfail, to make its students anything other or\nless than gentlemen ?\nOur Colleges are, we shall always suppose,\nto lend men, be they by nature boors, ani-\nmals, what you will, a certain manner; nay,\nmore manners.\nThat is what one feels regarding such an\ninstitution as the old Collegio dei Nobili in\nParma: it did lend its students manners, ad-\ndress, a certain polish. And that is definite\ngain. It matters nothing whether the student\nbe poor, of humble parentage, rich or of the\nbluest blood. Every man surely wishes to\nhave fine manners, nor will he object if the\nworld note it. And the old College Theatres\nwere of value in so far as they contributed to-\nwards this end.\nProfessor Nicoll seems to lay great store\nby the fine fact that a student has paid for\nhis own Education; that he has sacrificed\nmany things to do so, and has had to con-\nsider bread and butter questions while doing\nso.\nThat's A1 highly creditable; but itN\ndoesn't in itself constitute any superiority over\nthose less unfortunately equipped. And those"}, {"page_pdf": 77, "page_imprimee": "165", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.77", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4311, "texte": "who believe it does, might consider the words\nof that ballad by Gilbert the wise .... a Lon-\ndoner and which begins :\nSpurn not the nobly born\nwith love affected\nNor treat with virtuous scorn\nthe well connected.\nHigh rank involves no shame....\nWe boast an equal claim\nWith him of humble name\nto be respected.\nBlue blood.... blue blood.... etc.\nProfessor Nicoll must not imagine that any\nof us undervalue the born democrat and the\nintellectual Bolschevic, but some of us can\nnever be brought nor bring ourselves to under-\nvalue the born gentleman. That is all.\nThe second point in my letter in which\nProfessor Nicoll finds \"some sort of confusion\"\nis that wherein I maintained that the study of\nthe Theatre and the Drama were not quite\nof an equal value to a University man:\nthat, while a little drama was most valuable,\ntheatricals were not particularly so ; were, in\nfact, something of a waste of time and\nmoney. And I added that it was perhaps\nthe Theatres more than the Colleges which\nneeded the millions to endow them with the\npower to study Theatricals: in fact that if\nthey were financially endowed with such po-\nwer it would be rendered unnecessary for Col-\n1 a »\nleges to step in: .... dare I even say, butt in.\nProfessor Nicoll mentions Mr Gordon\nCraig, and by so doing strengthens my argu-\nment.\nMr Craig, says Professor Nicoll, has per-\nsuaded the Editor of \" The Mask \" to pub-\nblish \" valuable plans of Rome and Paris and\npresent its readers with engravings and draw-\nings of bygone Theatres and he is to be\npraised \".\nBut praise is cheap, and soft words butter\nno parsnips\". Is Mr. Craig merely to be\n4 praised ' for his services,... a little sweet\nwind blown upon him.... while Colleges are\nto receive solid support to play at Theatri-\ncals, usurp a position not their own ? Because\nMr Craig is an artist, not a collegiate body,\n(not even a Professor like Herr Max Rein-\nhardt) is he to step aside — be side-step-\nped — ; passed over and denied support while\nthat support is given to Universities and Col-\nleges for the very work he initiated and was\nborn to do ?\nHe it is who wishes to reestablish his\n\" School for the Art of the Theatre and\nis entitled to do so since the whole idea for\nsuch Schools originated with him. It seems\nhowever that Professor Nicoll would prefer to\ndo it for him and is laying his plans to do so.\nNow Professor Nicoll is a most able Pro-\nfessor, and he cannot be blamed because he\nis not an artist. To blame him would be as\nirrational as to blame a man for being born\nwith a silver spoon in his mouth.\nBut for all this it is, I think, the artist\nand not the professor who can be relied on\nbest, to give to the theatre all it needs. And,\nso long as college professors put themselves\nforward to usurp the offices which ought by\nevery right to be filled by artists and theatre\nmen, they continue to do the theatre, regar-\nding which they profess to be solicitous, se-\nrious harm.\nProfessor Nicoll writes in rather too pa-\nthetic a tone. He says he thinks there is\nsurely room for 44 any endeavour which strives\nto give the artist opportunity of developing\nand improving his art \". Which is a fine-\nsounding phrase, but a hollow one when\nexamined.\nThe best way to 44 give the artist oppor-\ntunity \" is to stand out of his light, to set\nfoot in no position which should be his by\nright of birth, endowment and capacity; to\nbring the powers of a trained academic intel-\nligence to bear so as to induce those in power,\nthose with financial control, to afford artist\nfunds to work with and opportunity to work.\nFirst put bur friend Gordon Craig into a\nposition to develope the art he knows so well,\nso that artists can thrive through him: then\nthere will be plenty of room in the outer\ncircle for a hundred professors and their ac-\ntivities.\nBut for the Professors to push forward\ntoday into the theatre and say 44 we can do\nthis , while there is a man who has been\ndoing it for twenty years yet who is still waiting\nfor the power and means to give to others\nthe result of his efforts, is a little too much.\nI wonder how the readers of 44 The Mask \"\nfeel about it ?\nMr Craig has had countless imitators.\nNow one more has to be added to the list,\nas Professor Nicoll, who long ago had his\nown task assigned him, pushes forward to run\nthe Gordon Craig School for the Art of the"}, {"page_pdf": 78, "page_imprimee": "166", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.78", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1026, "texte": "Theatre, calling it \" The London University\nSchool of Dramatic Study and Research \".\nIt is just what Professor Baker did at\nHarvard.\nFor years Craig had projected and called\nfor such a School. Baker, across the Atlantic,\nlooking up from correcting the theses of the\nyoung gentlemen of Harvard, heard and echoed\nhim, and, being quite smart, got it.\nBut Baker's School was what Nicoll's\nSchool will be, .... a Professor's School.\nCraig called for a school for serious crafts-\nmen who should then be drafted into a spe-\ncial, an experimental, Theatre; who should\nstudy practically under artists, not under pro-\nfessors. And, while he still awaits his op-\nportunity, professors parody the whole scheme,\nsquandering endowment money and their own,\nand, I fear, their students', time\nIf I am a little warm in my expressions\nin this note it is that I for one dislike to see\na valuable artist like Craig wasted, while\nevery amateur seems able to push forward,\nelbowing his way into a position which Craig\nrefuses to use elbows to gain."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c094", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c094", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "166", "page_fin": "173", "image_debut": 78, "image_fin": 85, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.23", "titre_corps": "MEASURED RECITATION A STUDY ON THE POETICAL RHYTHMS OF SPEECH", "titre_sommaire": "MEASURED RECITATION A STUDY ON THE POETICAL RHYTHMS OF SPEECH", "signature_source": "LORENZO GUIDO BREZZO", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 78, "page_imprimee": "166", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.78", "debut_caractere": 1028, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2762, "texte": "MEASURED\nRECITATION\nA STUDY ON THE\nPOETICAL RHYTHMS OF SPEECH\nBY LORENZO GUIDO BREZZO\n11 'tis we musicians know n\n(R. Browning: Abt Vogltr),\nPURE RHYTHM\n1. - Rhythm is the order of elements in\nsuccession.\n2. - A rhythm measure (shortly a )\nis a duration unity that can be repeated inde-\nfinitely in succession.\n3. - Measured isochronism finds its origin\nin the tendency of the mind to perceive phe-\nnomena under the aspect of unity. That per-\nception is easy in proportion to the degree of\nlikeness possessed by the component elements;\nfor, the greater the likeness, the weaker will\nbe the power of attracting attention, exercised\nby each.\n4. - In order to become perceptible to the\near, a measure must be filled with sound. As\nregards speech, the sound is the spoken language.\n5. - In order to make each measure per-\nceived separately, the sound must undergo a\nmodification at the beginning of every measure.\nThe modification, in the present case, is one\nof intensity.\n6. - If we consider the spoken language as\na prolonged sound, every fraction of that sound\nbetween two successive moments of diminished\nintensity constitutes a syllable (1\\\n7. - \" The strength of each separate force-\nimpulse, such as we give to the separate syl-\nlables, tends to diminish progressively. The\nbeginning of each of these force-impulses marks\nthe beginning of the syllable \" We shall\ncall this beginning \" accent \", and use it to\nmark the beginning of the measure.\n8. - When every measure is marked by\nan accent, we have the measured diction,\nwhich gives rise to poetical rhythm. Ordinary (i.\ne. unmeasured) diction produces prose rhythm.\n\n(1) SWEET. A handbook of phonetics, p. 87. —\nJONES. The pronunciation of English, p. 55.\n(2) SWEET. Ibid.p. 89."}, {"page_pdf": 79, "page_imprimee": "167", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.79", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4195, "texte": "9. Accent isochronism is therefore the first\nfundamental law of poetical rhythm (1).\n10. - The syllables of any indefinite set\nnever possess accents of equal intensity. If\nwe call the weakest accents 1, accents 2 will\ndivide the set into groups of several measures.\nEach group constitutes a foot. The foot-accent\ntends towards isochronism (9), that is, the set\nis apt to fall into equal feet.\n11. - We shall indicate the measure and\nthe foot by means of the symbols — , VJ . It\nmust be remembered that either of them stands\nfor a measure, not for a syllable. The former\nstands for a measure marked by accent 2,. the\nlatter for a measure marked by accent 1. To\navoid confusion, they shall be called strong and\nWeak, not longa and brevis.\n12. - In any definite set of syllables, some foot-\naccents are stronger. We shall call them 3\nThey will divide the sets into groups, and each\ngroup constitutes a metre. The metre-accent\ntends toward isochronism (9).\n13. - The secondfundamental law o\nrhythm is seen at work constantly for the first\ntime, in connection with the metre. The ac-\ncent proper to a rhythm-member finds its place\nat the end of the member. The reason is\nthis. An accent is a point on which attention\nis focused : what enables a stronger accent to\nattract attention is the difference between its\nown intensity, and that of the weaker accents.\nNow, this difference cannot be felt unless the\nweaker accents be heard first.\n14. - As it is easier to imagine few than\nmany objects together, the rhythm-member that\nis apt to prevail is always the simplest pos-\nsible (3). This fact constitutes the third fun-\ndamental law of poetical rhythm.\n15. This is the notation of the metre of\ntwo two-measure feet, which is the simplest\npossible :\n16. - In any indefinite set of metres, some\nmetre-accents are stronger. We shall mark\nthem 4 (,). They will divide the sets into\ngroups : each group constitutes a verse. The\nverse-accent is final (13), and tends to iso-\nchronism (9). This is the notation of the two-\nmetre verse :\n17. - In the same way, groups of verses are\nformed with final isochronous accents which\nwill be marked 5. Each group constitutes a\npolustich :\n18. - Stanzas are formed in the same way,\nwith final isochronous accents to be marked 6.\nHere is the two-polystich stanza :\n19. - Intermediate rhythm members are not\nas a rule found between the stanza and the\npoem. The last accent of the poem is its\naccent proper, which might* be marked 7, if\nnecessary.\n20. - In the typical stanza scheme (18)\nall the rhythm-members of the same order are\nalike, and all the members are binary. Rhythm\nis therefore perceived here under the aspect\nof unity, as perfectly as possible.\n21. \" Besides the tendency to unity (3), the\nmind possesses a tendency to perceive phe-\nnomena under the aspect of multiplicity. So\nthe perception of a phenomenon is not satis-\nfactory, unless it takes place under both\naspects (2). Unconsciously following this second\ntendency, usage has modified the typical stanza\nscheme, imperfect because too unitary, into\nforms much too numerous to be recorded,\nwhich are obtained by combining in every\n\n(1) 44 The fundamental and necessary law of verse-\nrhythm is the equality of time-periods marked by stress ' .\nPublications of the Modern Language Association of Ame-\nrica, vol. XXXIX, no. 4, Dec. 1924: Report of the\nCommittee on Metrical Notation.\n(2) Further on, it will be sufficient to mark metre-\naccents by placing the sign | before the stressed syllable.\n(3) It must be noticed that a quaternary member is sim-\npler than a ternary one, for it can split into two equal\ngroups; a senary member is simpler than a quinary one,\nfor it can be split into two or three equal groups, and\nso on.\n(1) Further on it will be sufficient to mark metre-accents\nby placing the sign |j before the stressed syllable.\n(2) We cannot, in a non-phylosophical study search\nfor reasons for this fact. Those who admit the existence\nof an objective reality, separated from the perceiving sub-\nject, will think the fact to be connected with the nature\nof that reality; that is, the universe to be, in some my-\nsterious and apparently contradictory way, one and, mani-\nfold at the same time."}, {"page_pdf": 80, "page_imprimee": "168", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.80", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4270, "texte": "possible way rhythm-members composed of\nany number of members of inferior order. In\nthese derivative schemes, any of the above-\nmentioned accent-isochronisms may be inter-\nrupted, or disappear. Yet, if we consider\nthe schemes that are met with in the literary\npractice, we shall find that, besides the indispen-\nsable measure-isochronism (8), several others are\ngenerally preserved, among which, stanza-iso-\nchronism is hardly ever wanting.\nSPEECH RHYTHM\n22. -Up to now, we have considered\nsyllables as if they were elements not subject,\nin their grouping, to any law but that of\nrhythm, so that we might use them to embody\nany given pure-rhythm scheme, as we might\nwith the sounds of a musical instrument. If\nthe language were an arbitrary construction,\nif it were possible, in order to represent ideas\nto make up words of such shape and size as\nwe please, we might make speech-members\ntally exactly with the members of any pure-\nrhythm scheme. Every simple idea could be\nrepresented by means of a one measure word,\nevery coumpound idea by means of as many\nwords as there are measures in the foot, and\nso on. But language is an autonomous and\nirregular construction, which we can make use\nof only on condition of respecting its laws.\nIn most cases, therefore, the correspondence\nbetween speech-members and pure-rhythm\nscheme members will be unattainable.\n23. - The members of speech are : the\nword, the phrase, the clause, the period.\n24. - Division of speech-members—. This\nis obvious as far as words are concerned. As\nto clauses and periods, the grammar principles\non the analysis of sentences are sufficient\nA phrase is more difficult to define (2),\nand therefore more difficult to divide by rule.\nYet the difficulty disappears in practice, most\nparticular instances being very clear.\n25. - Accent. — Each member of speech\nis endowed with a proper accent, which could\nbe called the centre of gravity of the whole\nmember. That accent must not be confused\nwith emphasis, which is a further stress added\noccasionally to a word accent, in order to\ngive prominence to the idea for which that\nword stands (I). Since the nature of that\naccent is rhythmical, the accent itself shall\nobey the rules of pure rhythm, as far as lan-\nguage structure and the meaning of speech\nwill permit.\nNamely : Word-accents have a fixed seat\nof linguistic origin, which cannot, as a rule,\nbe influenced by rhythm-law.\nPhrase-, clause-, and period-accents fol-\nlow the second fundamental law of poetical-\nrhythm (13), and place themselves at the end\nof the member.\nNot all accents marked with the same\nnumber have exactly the same degree of in-\ntensity. Yet, to take into account all possible\ndegrees is unnecessary and would lead to\nconfusion. The meaning of numbers in our\nnotation is that any accent of a given order\n—3, for instance-is always stronger than\nthe strongest accent of the inferior order—2—,\nand weaker than the weakest accent of the\nsuperior order—4—.\nThe word on which the accent falls need\nnot be the most important of the member, as\nhere we have to do with accent, not with\nemphasis (25). As long as the accent does\nnot lend the word a prominence inconsistent\nwith the natural meaning of the member, the\nword itself is immaterial.\nIn the following clause, the last word is\na different one at each inversion. Yet the\naccent always falls on that.\nBut time drives flocks from field to \\\\ fold(2)\nFrom field to fold drives time the jj flocks\nThe flocks from field to fold drives (| time\nFrom field to fold time flocks does || drive\nIt is easy to make up similar examples for\nthe phrase and the period.\n26. - Separation of speech-members. —\nSpeech-members are separated from each\nother by means of caesurae. We have syl-\nlable-, word-, phrase-, clause-, and period-cae-\nsurae. A caesura is a moment of relaxed\n\n(1) NESFIELD. English grammar, past and present,\np. 102.\n(2) Ibid. p. 2. Nesfield's definition of the phrase is\nbut a negative one.\n(1) As the nature of emphasis is not rhythmical but\nlogical, the fact itself is outside the scope of our present\nresearch. Besides, emphasis is, to a great extent, arbitrary\nand variable.\nSee E. A. Poe: The Rationale of verse. Complete\nWorks: Black, London 1901, vol. Ill, p. 242.\n(2) RALEIGH. Answer to Marlow s Passionate Shep-\nherd."}, {"page_pdf": 81, "page_imprimee": "169", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.81", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 3783, "texte": "attention, caused by a diminution of intensity,\nwhich will soon attain to silence, whenever\nthe caesura is of some importance. Since there\ncannot be degrees of silence as there are\ndegrees of intensity, silence-caesurae are in-\ntensified by being lengthened. As a rule,\nthe stronger the accent, the more important\nwill be the following caesura.\nMEASURED DICTION\n27. - Ordinary speech diction is not mea-\nsured, since neither the syllables nor the cae-\nsurae have an absolutely fixed duration. The\nrelative duration values (quantity) proper to\nspeech-sounds, already variable in themselves\nto a notable extent, are moreover incessantly\nmodified by emphasis Yet this variety\nis restrained by limits which cannot be disre-\ngarded in practice, for it is through keeping\nwithin these limits that each uttered portion\nof speech can retain a quantitative physiognomy\nsufficient for its instant recognition. Clearness\nand power of speech greatly depend upon\nthat.\nSpeech becomes measured in order to\nacquire further unity through rhythm (3). That\nend is desirable only inasmuch as it can be\nattained without loss of clearness or power,\nor, at least, with greater gain than loss. Mea-\nsured diction, therefore, must needs be founded\non ordinary good diction. One of its charac-\nteristic features is, that accent always prevails\nover emphasis (25).\n28. - Measures and syllables. —As the\nsyllable is practically the shortest element of\nthe language, it is apt to coincide with the\nmeasure which is the least member of pure\nrhythm. So a measure will usually be filled\nup with a syllable of average length. The\nresult will be that its relative duration will\nprove sometimes a little longer, sometimes a\nlittle shorter than in ordinary diction. If\nthis difference exceeds a certain limit, the\ndiction becomes too artificial, and clearness\nor power of speech is impaired. In that case,\nthe syllable shall be made to last more than\none measure, or a measure shall be filled up\nwith several syllables. Naturalness of utte-\nrance is further preserved :\na) By beginning a syllable after the be-\nginning of a measure, and filling up the gap\neither with a lengthened preceding syllable,\nor with a caesura, according to sense. This\nis often done with weak syllables and occa-\nsionally with strong syllables in weak feet.\nThe fourth syllable begins towards the\nmiddle of the fourth measure.\nb) By beginning a syllable before the be-\nginning of a measure and shortening the pre-\nceding syllable accordingly.\nThe fourth syllable lasts somewhat less and\nthe fifth somewhat more than a measure.\n29. - Feet and words. — Feet naturally\ntend to be binary (14), if that is compatible\nwith natural diction. If not, they become\nternary, again to revert to binary grouping as\nsoon as possible. Yet, should they be com-\npelled to remain ternary for a considerable\ntime, the tendency to the simplest member (14)\nwould be overcome by the law of isochro-\nnism (9), and ternary grouping would acquire\na certain degree of stability.\nThe tendency to foot-accent isochronism\nwill sometimes induce a lengthening, or, less\nfrequently, a shortening of a syllable, not no-\nticeable in ordinary diction, and which is\nquite permissable, so long as it does not in-\nterfere with clearness or power of speech.\nThe second syllable is lengthened in mea-\nsured diction that foot-accent isochronism may\nbe preserved.\n30. - Metres and phrases. — Everything\nthat has been said about feet and words, ap-\nplies to metres and phrases, with the only dif-\nference that metre-accent isochronism will be\nmore often interrupted. For, if it is easy to\nget rid of a redundant measure by shortening\na syllable, or to obtain an extra measure by\n\n(1) SWEET'S Handbook,p. 97.\n(1) TAGORE. Gilanjali, 2.\n(2) SPENSER. T Bridal Day.\n(3) TAGORE. Gitanjali, 2."}, {"page_pdf": 82, "page_imprimee": "170", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.82", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 3293, "texte": "lengthening a syllable or inserting a short\ncaesura, it is hardly ever possible to make\naway with the duration of one or several feet, or\nto wedge in a long caesura without marring\nthe sense. Yet, instances of metres, partly\nfilled up with words, and completed by means\nof added silent measures, are very often to be\nmet with (34). Here are examples of how\ndifferent metres get formed under the influ-\nence of speech-rhythm;\nThe binary metre is preserved throughout,\nas the sense allows the syllable \" cap \" to\nhave accent 3 on it.\nAs the sense forbids the first syllable of\n\" little \" having an accent stronger than 2,\nthe metre becomes ternary. On the other\nhand, as \"cap \" cannot have an accent weaker\nthan 3, the following metre consists of a single\nfoot.\nA new foot, with accent 2 (tiny) being\nadded, the metre becomes quaternary.\nOwing to the new foot (pretty), with\naccent 2, the metre becomes quinary. It is\nto be noticed that quinary metres are already\ncomparatively rare, and longer metres are\nbecoming rarer and rarer as ihe number of\ncomponent reet increases.\n31. - Verses and clauses. — The difficulty\nof preserving accent-isochronism is still greater.\n32. - Polystichs and periods. — To pre-\nserve accent-isochronism is all but impossible.\n33. - There are no members of speech\nthat outwardly correspond to stanzas. They\nare made up of several periods linked toge-\nther into a compound one by the sense.\n34. - Duration of caesurae. — When a\nsufficient number of measures marked by syl-\nlable-accents has been heard, the measure is\nkept up, for some time, by habit, in the mind,\nthough the voice be silent. The same thing\nhappens with all rhythm-members. It is clear\nthat the period of a rhythm-member cannot\nchange during silence, for want of accent.\nTherefore a caesura (9) shall normally last\nas many measures as are required, in order\nthat the first subsequent accent may fall in\nwith the accent-period in progress.\n35. - From what has been said, it follows\nthat measured diction does not necessarily\ndepend on any special arrangement of words,\nthough that arrangement may have a great\ninfluence upon the degree of excellence of\nthe poetical rhythm obtainable in each instance.\nTherefore, under the aspect of rhythm we\ncannot properly speak of poetical or prose\nform as visible in writing, since speech, in\nwhatever form be it written, is always ame-\nnable to measured as well as to ordinary\ndiction.\nPOETICAL RHYTHM FORMS\nTO BE MET WITH IN PRACTICE.\n36. - Since the poetical rhythm-form of a\nliterary piece is determined by the interplay\nof pure-rhythm laws, and the laws of speech,\nit is different for each piece, so that no list\nof pre established schemes can possibly be\ngiven. Yet, in that interplay, we shall di-\nstinguish three phases, to one of which any\ngiven form can be ascribed.\n37. - First phase. — The members of speech\nare moulded upon the pattern of a pure-rhythm\nscheme.\na) Syllables are moulded upon measures :\nThis happens very frequently, as it is\nrather easy to arrange the speech so as to\nhave a set of syllable-words that can be made\n\n(!) We feel we must apologize for atrociously spoi-\nling the first line in Kipling's Mandalay. We took the\nliberty of so doing, as the example suited our present\npurpose, to perfection.\n(1) MARLOW'S Passionate Shepherd."}, {"page_pdf": 83, "page_imprimee": "171", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.83", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2535, "texte": "to last one measure each, withont loss of ;\nnatural diction. 1\nb) Words are moulded upon feet:\nThis is not so easy, as it is often impos-\nsible to arrange the speech so as to have a\nset of words identical in number of syllables,\nnatural quantity and accent.\nc) Phrases are moulded upon metres :\nEx: The longer 1 life, the more of || fence ;\nThe more of | fence, the greater |J pain,\nThe greater pain, the less de | fence,\nThe less de fence, the greater | gain<2>.\nd) Clauses are moulded upon verses:\nEx. Open the temple-gates unto my [j love,\nOpen them wide that she may enter || in;\nAnd all the posts adorn as doth be || hove,\nAnd all the pillars deck with garlands ||\ntrim\nThis case is extremely common.\ne) Periods are moulded upon poiystichs :\nEx : The ghosts of Ossian skim the misty vale,\nAnd hosts of Sylphids on the moon-beam\nsail <♦>.\n/) Compound periods are moulded upon\nstanzas:\nEx: What should we talk of dainties, then,\nOr better meat than's fit for men ?\nThese are but vain; that's only good\nWhich God hath blessed and sent for\nfood (5).\nThis case is normal with hardly any ex-\nception.\n38. - Second phase. — Speech members\nare no longer moulded upon the pattern of\na pure rhythm-scheme, yet the latter is still\npartly made perceptible through rhyme. Rhyme\nis an assimilation of sounds under the aspect\nof quality. It is chiefly employed as a factor\nof unitary perception; but this point does not\nconcern us here, as it has nothing to do with\nrhythm.\nRhyme is also used to mark the end of\na rhythm-member, generally a verse (,). Then\nits office is akin to that of accent; in fact,\nit might be called a quality accent.\na) Verses are made perceptible through\nrhyme:\n39. - Third phase. — Rhyme having dis-\nappeared, pure I-rhythm members no longer\nretain a means of their own through which\nto make themselves perceptible side by side\nwith speech-members.\nThat means that one of the two rhythm-\npatterns must be sacrificed. Which shall it\nbe? If we give up speech-rhythm, we betray\na tendency towards a uni-lateral notion of\n\n(1) DRYDEN'S, Alexander's Feast.\n(2) WYATT. One might object that these are clau-\nses, not phrases. That is true; yet rhythmically speaking,\nthe place of a phrase is sometimes taken up by a clause.\n(3) SPENSER. The Bridal Day.\n(4) H. K. WHITE. Clifton Grove.\n(5) RALEIGH. Answer to Marlow's 'Passionate\nShepherd.\n(1) See POE. The Rationale of Verse, etc.\np. 232.\n(2) MILTON. II penseroso. In order to make speech-\nmembers clearly seen, we begin a new line at each\nclause.\n(3) J. MONTGOMERY. Religion."}, {"page_pdf": 84, "page_imprimee": "172", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.84", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1845, "texte": "poetical art, that is, towards considering it as\nbeing outside the pale of ideas, and akin to\ninstrumental music. So it seems that the\nadvisability of abandoning pure rhythm may\nbe taken for granted.\nYet, shall a poet take pains to cut his\nsentences into an elaborate system of lines\nand use a number of otherwise totally unne-\ncessary capitals, only to give his readers the\ntrouble of undoing his work ? The argument\nis a strong one ; yet it can be reversed. Shall\na poet—Milton for instance, — carefully break\nhis lines and build up their fragments into\nspeech-members of ever-changing length, that\nthe reader may do his best to merge that\nbeautiful variety into a monotonous sequence\nof iambic pentameters ? If a poet desires a\npure-rhythm scheme to be perceptible in his\nwork, let him make it tally with his speech-\nmembers.\n40. -In the following examples, the no-\ntation is calculated to give prominence to\nspeech-rhythm only. Pure-rhythm schemes,\nwhen existing, have been disregarded.\nPolystichs are separated from each other\nby means of a blank line.\nCaesurae are marked, when necessary, by\nmeans of blank measures <x).\n41. - Example I.\n\n(1) It might be objected that, while our notation\nshows exactly the duration of the time-interval between\nany two successive accents, it possesses no signs to mark\nsyllable-quantity, such as, for instance, are suggested in\nthe above quoted \" Report of the Committee on Metri-\ncal Notation. \"To justify this want, we give the follow-\ning reasons. On the one hand, we think a syllable-\nquantity notation is unnecessary. What is indispensable\ncan be shown by the position of the measure-signs. For\nthe rest, the reader will be guided by good natural dic-\ntion (27). On the other hand, we fear that any such\nnotation would either prove confusingly complex, or fall\nshort of precision.\n(!) HAMLET, III, 1."}, {"page_pdf": 85, "page_imprimee": "173", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.85", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2916, "texte": "43. - If we compare the two last examples,\nthe first of which was written by the poet in\nthe manner peculiar to the pure-rhythm scheme\ncalled iambic pentameter, the second in the\none peculiar to prose, we get further evidence\nof what was stated at No. 35: namely, that\ndiction, as marked by us, does not, as far\nas rhythm is concerned, afford any ground for\ndistinguishing prose form from poetical form.\nThe rhythm features of the two are the same:\nmeasure-accent isochronism maintained throu-\nghout, foot-accent isochronism seldom inter-\nrupted, metre-accent isochronism broken oftener,\nverse-accent isochronism all but wanting, po-\nlystich-accent isochronism wanting altogether.\nIt is true that in the second example, we\noften find a syllable lasting two measures,\nwhereas in the first, that happens only once.\nYet such cases, as well as the opposite ones\nof one measure filled up with several syllables,\nare extremely frequent in numerous poems\nunmistakably written in what is usually called\n44. - We shall conclude our study by ob-\nserving that the same has enabled us to take\na bird's-eye view of the whole range of pos-\nsible poetical rhythm forms, from those through\nwhich unity alone is best expressed, and which\ncan be realized only with the help of pure\nsound in instrumental music, (18) to some\nchosen from actual literature, among such as\nbest embody multiplicity. (41-42).\nThe search for and analysis of particular\nforms, together with the examination of their\naesthetic worth, cannot be the object of an\nessay on general principles.\nYet, let us state a fundamental rule: The\nbetter a rhythmic form unites harmoniously\nwell-balanced expression of unity and multi-\nplicity with clearness and power of speech\nthe higher its literary merit will be.\n\n(1) TAGORE. Gitanjali, 2.\n(1) E. BARRETT-BROWNING, A musical instrument.\n(2) HAMLET, III, 1.\no ADDITIONAL WORKS TO BE CONSULTED, O\nABERCROMBIE Lascelles. 'Principles of Prosody, (1923).\nANDREW. Writing and Reading of VerseI\nBAUM P. F. The Principles of English Versification,\nCambridge, Harv. Univ. Press, 1922.\nDABNEY J. P. Musical Basis of Verse. Longmans, 1901,\nGOUJON H. L'Expression du Rhytme Mental dans la\nM&lodie et la Parole. Paris, Paulin, 1907.\nGUEST E. History of English Rhythm ; London, 1882.\nLANIER. Science of English Verse, (1880).\nMAYOR J. H. Chapters on English Metre. Macmillan,l 901.\nOMOND, Study of Metre, (1903).\nOLIVERO F. II ritornello e la Ripetizione in E. A. Poe, in\n\" Studi sul Romanticism© inglese Bari, Laterza, 1914.\nSAINTSBURY, History of English Prosody. Macmillan*\nSCHIPPER J. A History of English Versification. Cla-\nrendon Press, 1910.\nSTEWART G. R. A Method toward the Study of Di~\npodic Verse, in \" Publications of The Modern Lan-\nguage Association of America Vol. XXXIX, No. 4,\nDecember 1924.\nSTEWART G. R. Modern Metrical Technique, (1922).\nTHOMSON William. The Rhythm of Speech.\nVERRIER. Metriqne Anglaise, (1909)."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c113", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c113", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "174", "page_fin": "177", "image_debut": 86, "image_fin": 93, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.24", "titre_corps": "THE PRETTY THEATRE", "titre_sommaire": "THE PRETTY THEATRE", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 86, "page_imprimee": "174", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.86", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4300, "texte": "THE PRETTY\nTHEATRE\n\nPART THREE\n\n(1)\nA LETTER FROM MLLE. GU1MARD TO M. DE\nLE FERTE INTEND ANT DES MENUS-PL AISIRS.\nLondres 26 may 1786 or 1787. (2)\nOn ne fait pas toujours ce que Von de-\nsire, mon cher petit bon ami, et fen ay bien\nla preuve, puisque malgrd celui que favois\nde vous icrire, des mon arrivee a Londres, je\nn'en ay pu trouver le moment. Mais Vami-\ntie est indulgente, et je compte trop sur la\nvotre pour ne pas etre convaincue quelle ne\nvous permettra pas d'etre injuste envers moi\nen vous laissant prendre pour negligence une\nimpossibility reelle.\nDepuis que je suis en cette ville on ne\nm'a pas encore laisse un seul instant de libre,\ncomblee des bontes de toutes les plus grandes\ndames, et principalement de M™e la duchesse\nde Devonshire. Je passe chez elle tout temps,\nou je ne suis pas employee au thiatre. En\nVerite, mon cher petit bon ami, la maniere\ndont on me recoit partout est si flatteuse quelle\npourroit bien faire tourner une tete moins sen-\nsee que celle de votre petite bonne amie,\nmais elle est ci'une trop rare bonte pour\npas a Vabri de toute epreuve. Vous allez en\njuger par les sages reflexions que ses nouveaus\nsucces lui ont fait faire, et dont elle va vous\nfaire part.\nJ'ai pense que je ne pouvois profiter\ncirconstance plus favorable pour terminer\nlamment ma carrieretheatrale, et je vous crois\ntrop mon ami pour ne pas approuver la re-\nsolution que je prends de quitter I'Opera.\nVous n'ignorez pas, que depuis quelque temps,\nil est devenu le centre des cabales, par con-\nsequent du mauvais gout, les perruquiers, les\nlaquais, sont devenus les juges des talents, les\nmiens n'ont jamais du leurs succes qua la\nbonne compagnie, et je ne veux pas risquer\nde devenir la pdture de celle dont on remplit\npresentement le parterre. II me seroit trop dur,\napres ving-cinq ans de suffrages bien soutenus,\nde finir par eprouver des desagrements, et\nparmi mes chers comarades, fen connois qui\nsont remplis de bonnes sur le chapi-\ntre. Or, comme dans tous les temps je n'ai\njamais cherche qua faire plaisir,]e\ntre le comble a mes procedds pour eux en\ndonnant ma demission. Disposes de ma place\nmon ami, mais si vous voules ecouter les con-\nseils de I'amitie, ne la donnes qu'au talent et\nnon a la protection ni au charlatanisme. Je\nvous le repete, il est tres dangereux de don-\nner legerement des premieres places, attendu\nque I'on n est plus matt de les oter aux\nsujets que Von a rendus pcssesseurs quand on\nfinit par voir clairement ne sont en etat\nde les remplir. II faut encourager les jeunes\nsujets en les recompensant bien. Soyez liberal\nen argent, mais avare des premieres places,\nsi vous volez ne pas fermer la porte de\n1'Opera aux vrais talents qui pourroient les\nmeriter. Excusez, mon . ami, si je vous donne\ndes conseils, mais c'est mon pour vous\nqui me les diete, ainsyque le desir que j'ay\nde ne pas voir detruire la belle\ndanse que j'ai Vu exister a I'Opera.\nOn m'a mande que vous aviez suspendu\n1'arret du conseil qui retablissoit les feux, fen\nsuis vraiment fachee; vous savez que je vous\nai toujours dit qu'il n'y avoit que ce moyen\nde retablir le bon ordre dans le service de\nI'Opera. On est bien plus empresse a remplir\nson devoir quand 1' interet est attache, et la\ncertitude de toucher son argent, tous les mois,\nsans nulle espece de conventions, rend bien\ndes sujets infiniment paresseux. Je tiens toujours\naux feux, sans eux cela ira toujours mal.\nJ'ai encore une grace a solliciter de votre\namitie, mon ami, c'est de permettre a\nvelon de tester a Londres jusqu'a la Jin du\nmois prochain. Independamment du service qui\nvous me rendrez en me laissant ce danseur,\nvous lui en rendrez aussi un bien grand, car\nil a paru un libelle a Paris, et il est accuse\nd'y etre pour quelques chose. On ma mande\nainsi qua lui quil etoit attendu a Paris par\nplusieurs mauvaises tetes de la cour et qu'on\nvouloit le rosser. Ce seroit une chose\ncheuse pour lui, qui (fen suis persuaded) ne\nle merite pas. Vous seul, mon ami, pouves le\nsoustraire a cette mauvaise affaire, en lui per-\nmettant de passer encore cinq semaines a Lon-\ndres. Dans cet intervalle, le tetes se calmeront\net a son retour on ne pensera plus au libelle.\nAccordes - moi cette grace, mon ami, fen\n\n(1) For parts 1. and 2 see \" The Mask October\n1924 and January 1925.\n(2) There is no date to the letter."}, {"page_pdf": 93, "page_imprimee": "177", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.93", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4193, "texte": "conserverai une bien vice reconnaissance, at-\ntendu quelle m arrangera aussi parfaitement\npuisque je viens de contracter, pour ces cinq\ndernieres semaines, un engagement de 650\nguindes qui, joints aux 950 que j'ai faites a\nmon bdndfice, me forment une tres jolie somme\na rapporter a Paris. Ce voyage na pas ete\nsi bete, hein! qu'en penses-vous? Dame, ce\nnest pas ma faute. lis m aiment a la folie,\nces bons Anglais ! Voila ce que c'est que le\nmerite !\nAh! ca, monsieur mon cher petit bon ami,\naimes - moi toujours bien, et autant que je\nvous aime, entendes - vous ? - moi, je\nvous en prie, et dites que vous me\nlaisses Nivelon. Vous nous rendrez service a\ntous les deux, et vous etes trop obligeant pour\nrefuser a votre petite bonne amie, qui vous\nembrasse de tout coeur.\nGUIMARD.\nMes respects je vous prie a Mme de la\nFerte ainsi qua Mme Desentelles, sans m'ou-\nblier aupres de son chaste epoux.\nMlle Sauniere vous porter a les commis-\nsions dont Mlle de la Bourdonnais m'avait\nchargde pour vous remettre.\nPall Mall No. 10.\nYOU remember this letter which is quoted\nby M. Edmond de Goncourt in the\n62nd paragraph of his delightful book on the\nfamous dancer.\nIt is a distinguished neatly written (l)\nexample of the usual theatric communications\nof all time which say \"1 am a great success\nbecause I am sought after for my art by great\npersons \" and which add \" I have made a\ngreat deal of money \".\nSometimes it is less studied as in the case\nof the fortunate dancer Mile. Boubon, when\nshe writes from London to the Hairdresser Al-\nbert of the Rue des Petits Champs saying \" Send\nme two more boxes of the Powder you keep\nfor the Princess Lamballe, for I am going to\ntake tea on the 1st of next month with the\nhighest personage in British Navy; one writes\nit so: Mr Midshipman and he has promised\nme the most sumptuous banquet of fish—\nthey call them les shrimps. I must not fail\nto appear a I'A Ibert and 1 pray youx not to\nforget, by the 1st of the month \".\nMile. Guimard as we see from her let-\nter was not left alone for an instant by the\ngreat ladies—in fact the Duchess of De-\nvonshire keeps her close to her all the time\nshe is not in the Theatre. Fortunate Duchess\nto be able to afford it—for Mile. Guimard's time\nwill cost the Duchess, or anybody else, money.\nThat is what is so admirable about La\nGuimard : she really did know how to make\nthe Pretty Theatre pay. Only one woman\never surpassed her in this.... the immense\nMile. Montansier; but then Mile. Montansier\nsurpassed every theatrical one in every thea-\ntrical thing, and for this became the head\nand front of the Pretty Theatre: there was\nnone like her, none. And some wretches even\nadded \" Thank God *\\\nBut La Guimard ran her close—was less\nof an agent and more or less of a free lance.\nShe seems to have managed to raise all\nher funds without bothering about any chorus,\nthat chorus on which la Montansier counted\nso greatly.\nAnd in 1772 to assist her to raise funds,\nshe persuaded one or more wealthy gentlemen\nto build h§r a maison. This Maison de\nMile. Guimard she sold in 1786: she sold it\nby lottery, 2500 tickets at 120 livres (so they\nsay ; others say 5 livres) a-piece were issued,\nsigned by Mile. Guimard and vised by\nM. Chavet the notary of Rue St. Martin. The\nlucky person to get the house for 120 livres\n(or for 5) for she bought but one ticket, was\nthe Comtesse du Langin who resold the place\nfor 500,000 francs to the banker Perregaux.\nThis house contained a little private Thea-\ntre from the designs of Architect Le Doux:\na jewel of a Theatre: a casket: able to hold\n500 spectators. The ceiling was painted by\nTaraval, the panels by Fragonard, the skirting\nboard by the great David. To the perfor-\nmances given here came every admirer of La\nGuimard and The Pretty Theatre. The re-\npertoire has been collected under the title\n\" Theatre d'Amour \".\nAssisting her would be Mile. Dervieux,\nMile. Duthe and other talented persons. La\nGuimard could hardly be described as pretty,\nbut, like Ophelia when mad, she, when sane,\nturned things to favour and to prettiness.\n{To be continued) %\n\n(1) It lies on my table as I write this, and every\nconsonant and every vowel in it breathe the practical\nbusiness woman.\n\nX. Y. Z."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c114", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c114", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "174", "page_fin": "177", "image_debut": 86, "image_fin": 93, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.24.1", "titre_corps": "PART THREE", "titre_sommaire": "PART THREE", "signature_source": "X. Y. Z", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 86, "page_imprimee": "174", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.86", "debut_caractere": 20, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4300, "texte": "PART THREE\n\n(1)\nA LETTER FROM MLLE. GU1MARD TO M. DE\nLE FERTE INTEND ANT DES MENUS-PL AISIRS.\nLondres 26 may 1786 or 1787. (2)\nOn ne fait pas toujours ce que Von de-\nsire, mon cher petit bon ami, et fen ay bien\nla preuve, puisque malgrd celui que favois\nde vous icrire, des mon arrivee a Londres, je\nn'en ay pu trouver le moment. Mais Vami-\ntie est indulgente, et je compte trop sur la\nvotre pour ne pas etre convaincue quelle ne\nvous permettra pas d'etre injuste envers moi\nen vous laissant prendre pour negligence une\nimpossibility reelle.\nDepuis que je suis en cette ville on ne\nm'a pas encore laisse un seul instant de libre,\ncomblee des bontes de toutes les plus grandes\ndames, et principalement de M™e la duchesse\nde Devonshire. Je passe chez elle tout temps,\nou je ne suis pas employee au thiatre. En\nVerite, mon cher petit bon ami, la maniere\ndont on me recoit partout est si flatteuse quelle\npourroit bien faire tourner une tete moins sen-\nsee que celle de votre petite bonne amie,\nmais elle est ci'une trop rare bonte pour\npas a Vabri de toute epreuve. Vous allez en\njuger par les sages reflexions que ses nouveaus\nsucces lui ont fait faire, et dont elle va vous\nfaire part.\nJ'ai pense que je ne pouvois profiter\ncirconstance plus favorable pour terminer\nlamment ma carrieretheatrale, et je vous crois\ntrop mon ami pour ne pas approuver la re-\nsolution que je prends de quitter I'Opera.\nVous n'ignorez pas, que depuis quelque temps,\nil est devenu le centre des cabales, par con-\nsequent du mauvais gout, les perruquiers, les\nlaquais, sont devenus les juges des talents, les\nmiens n'ont jamais du leurs succes qua la\nbonne compagnie, et je ne veux pas risquer\nde devenir la pdture de celle dont on remplit\npresentement le parterre. II me seroit trop dur,\napres ving-cinq ans de suffrages bien soutenus,\nde finir par eprouver des desagrements, et\nparmi mes chers comarades, fen connois qui\nsont remplis de bonnes sur le chapi-\ntre. Or, comme dans tous les temps je n'ai\njamais cherche qua faire plaisir,]e\ntre le comble a mes procedds pour eux en\ndonnant ma demission. Disposes de ma place\nmon ami, mais si vous voules ecouter les con-\nseils de I'amitie, ne la donnes qu'au talent et\nnon a la protection ni au charlatanisme. Je\nvous le repete, il est tres dangereux de don-\nner legerement des premieres places, attendu\nque I'on n est plus matt de les oter aux\nsujets que Von a rendus pcssesseurs quand on\nfinit par voir clairement ne sont en etat\nde les remplir. II faut encourager les jeunes\nsujets en les recompensant bien. Soyez liberal\nen argent, mais avare des premieres places,\nsi vous volez ne pas fermer la porte de\n1'Opera aux vrais talents qui pourroient les\nmeriter. Excusez, mon . ami, si je vous donne\ndes conseils, mais c'est mon pour vous\nqui me les diete, ainsyque le desir que j'ay\nde ne pas voir detruire la belle\ndanse que j'ai Vu exister a I'Opera.\nOn m'a mande que vous aviez suspendu\n1'arret du conseil qui retablissoit les feux, fen\nsuis vraiment fachee; vous savez que je vous\nai toujours dit qu'il n'y avoit que ce moyen\nde retablir le bon ordre dans le service de\nI'Opera. On est bien plus empresse a remplir\nson devoir quand 1' interet est attache, et la\ncertitude de toucher son argent, tous les mois,\nsans nulle espece de conventions, rend bien\ndes sujets infiniment paresseux. Je tiens toujours\naux feux, sans eux cela ira toujours mal.\nJ'ai encore une grace a solliciter de votre\namitie, mon ami, c'est de permettre a\nvelon de tester a Londres jusqu'a la Jin du\nmois prochain. Independamment du service qui\nvous me rendrez en me laissant ce danseur,\nvous lui en rendrez aussi un bien grand, car\nil a paru un libelle a Paris, et il est accuse\nd'y etre pour quelques chose. On ma mande\nainsi qua lui quil etoit attendu a Paris par\nplusieurs mauvaises tetes de la cour et qu'on\nvouloit le rosser. Ce seroit une chose\ncheuse pour lui, qui (fen suis persuaded) ne\nle merite pas. Vous seul, mon ami, pouves le\nsoustraire a cette mauvaise affaire, en lui per-\nmettant de passer encore cinq semaines a Lon-\ndres. Dans cet intervalle, le tetes se calmeront\net a son retour on ne pensera plus au libelle.\nAccordes - moi cette grace, mon ami, fen\n\n(1) For parts 1. and 2 see \" The Mask October\n1924 and January 1925.\n(2) There is no date to the letter."}, {"page_pdf": 93, "page_imprimee": "177", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.93", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4193, "texte": "conserverai une bien vice reconnaissance, at-\ntendu quelle m arrangera aussi parfaitement\npuisque je viens de contracter, pour ces cinq\ndernieres semaines, un engagement de 650\nguindes qui, joints aux 950 que j'ai faites a\nmon bdndfice, me forment une tres jolie somme\na rapporter a Paris. Ce voyage na pas ete\nsi bete, hein! qu'en penses-vous? Dame, ce\nnest pas ma faute. lis m aiment a la folie,\nces bons Anglais ! Voila ce que c'est que le\nmerite !\nAh! ca, monsieur mon cher petit bon ami,\naimes - moi toujours bien, et autant que je\nvous aime, entendes - vous ? - moi, je\nvous en prie, et dites que vous me\nlaisses Nivelon. Vous nous rendrez service a\ntous les deux, et vous etes trop obligeant pour\nrefuser a votre petite bonne amie, qui vous\nembrasse de tout coeur.\nGUIMARD.\nMes respects je vous prie a Mme de la\nFerte ainsi qua Mme Desentelles, sans m'ou-\nblier aupres de son chaste epoux.\nMlle Sauniere vous porter a les commis-\nsions dont Mlle de la Bourdonnais m'avait\nchargde pour vous remettre.\nPall Mall No. 10.\nYOU remember this letter which is quoted\nby M. Edmond de Goncourt in the\n62nd paragraph of his delightful book on the\nfamous dancer.\nIt is a distinguished neatly written (l)\nexample of the usual theatric communications\nof all time which say \"1 am a great success\nbecause I am sought after for my art by great\npersons \" and which add \" I have made a\ngreat deal of money \".\nSometimes it is less studied as in the case\nof the fortunate dancer Mile. Boubon, when\nshe writes from London to the Hairdresser Al-\nbert of the Rue des Petits Champs saying \" Send\nme two more boxes of the Powder you keep\nfor the Princess Lamballe, for I am going to\ntake tea on the 1st of next month with the\nhighest personage in British Navy; one writes\nit so: Mr Midshipman and he has promised\nme the most sumptuous banquet of fish—\nthey call them les shrimps. I must not fail\nto appear a I'A Ibert and 1 pray youx not to\nforget, by the 1st of the month \".\nMile. Guimard as we see from her let-\nter was not left alone for an instant by the\ngreat ladies—in fact the Duchess of De-\nvonshire keeps her close to her all the time\nshe is not in the Theatre. Fortunate Duchess\nto be able to afford it—for Mile. Guimard's time\nwill cost the Duchess, or anybody else, money.\nThat is what is so admirable about La\nGuimard : she really did know how to make\nthe Pretty Theatre pay. Only one woman\never surpassed her in this.... the immense\nMile. Montansier; but then Mile. Montansier\nsurpassed every theatrical one in every thea-\ntrical thing, and for this became the head\nand front of the Pretty Theatre: there was\nnone like her, none. And some wretches even\nadded \" Thank God *\\\nBut La Guimard ran her close—was less\nof an agent and more or less of a free lance.\nShe seems to have managed to raise all\nher funds without bothering about any chorus,\nthat chorus on which la Montansier counted\nso greatly.\nAnd in 1772 to assist her to raise funds,\nshe persuaded one or more wealthy gentlemen\nto build h§r a maison. This Maison de\nMile. Guimard she sold in 1786: she sold it\nby lottery, 2500 tickets at 120 livres (so they\nsay ; others say 5 livres) a-piece were issued,\nsigned by Mile. Guimard and vised by\nM. Chavet the notary of Rue St. Martin. The\nlucky person to get the house for 120 livres\n(or for 5) for she bought but one ticket, was\nthe Comtesse du Langin who resold the place\nfor 500,000 francs to the banker Perregaux.\nThis house contained a little private Thea-\ntre from the designs of Architect Le Doux:\na jewel of a Theatre: a casket: able to hold\n500 spectators. The ceiling was painted by\nTaraval, the panels by Fragonard, the skirting\nboard by the great David. To the perfor-\nmances given here came every admirer of La\nGuimard and The Pretty Theatre. The re-\npertoire has been collected under the title\n\" Theatre d'Amour \".\nAssisting her would be Mile. Dervieux,\nMile. Duthe and other talented persons. La\nGuimard could hardly be described as pretty,\nbut, like Ophelia when mad, she, when sane,\nturned things to favour and to prettiness.\n{To be continued) %\n\n(1) It lies on my table as I write this, and every\nconsonant and every vowel in it breathe the practical\nbusiness woman.\n\nX. Y. Z."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c115", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c115", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "n. p.", "page_fin": "n. p.", "image_debut": 87, "image_fin": 87, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.24.1.1", "titre_corps": "THE PRIVATE THEATRE OF MADEMOISELLE GUIMARD", "titre_sommaire": "THE PRIVATE THEATRE OF MADEMOISELLE GUIMARD", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 87, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.87", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 203, "texte": "THE PRIVATE THEATRE OF MADEMOISELLE GUIMARD.\nBuilt in 1772 by Architect Le Doux in her house. Inaugurated on December 8th\nwith Collè's \"La Partie de Chasse d' Henri IV\" followed by \"Pygmalion\".\nPlate 13."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c116", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c116", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "n. p.", "page_fin": "n. p.", "image_debut": 89, "image_fin": 89, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.24.1.2", "titre_corps": "GROUND PLAN OF THE PRIVATE THEATRE OF MADEMOISELLE GUIMARD", "titre_sommaire": "GROUND PLAN OF THE PRIVATE THEATRE OF MADEMOISELLE GUIMARD", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 89, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.89", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 69, "texte": "GROUND PLAN OF THE PRIVATE THEATRE OF\nMADEMOISELLE GUIMARD.\nPlate 14."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c117", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c117", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "n. p.", "page_fin": "n. p.", "image_debut": 91, "image_fin": 91, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.24.1.3", "titre_corps": "A PRETTY THEATRE", "titre_sommaire": "A PRETTY THEATRE", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 91, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.91", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 419, "texte": "A PRETTY THEATRE. PROJECT FOR A HOUSE FOR Mme. LA COMTESSE\nDU BARRY (1768-69): Architect LE DOUX.\nThe Theatre in this project of 1768-69 should be compared with that built by Le Doux\nfor La Guimard 1772 on a piece of this ground along the Chaussèe d'Antin. Compare\nalso with the Private Teatro of Cardinal Ottoboni built by Juvarra some seventy\nyears earlier in Roma, about 1705. (See Plate 2. The Mask, January. 7925)."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c118", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c118", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "178", "page_fin": "181", "image_debut": 94, "image_fin": 97, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.25", "titre_corps": "THE COMEDIE FRANCAISE IN PARIS. A PILGRIMAGE TO THE THEATRE AND A RECORD OF DISCOVERIES MADE IN THE BUILDING OF THE OLDEST EXISTING THEATRE IN FRANCE", "titre_sommaire": "THE COMEDIE FRANCAISE IN PARIS. A PILGRIMAGE TO THE THEATRE AND A RECORD OF DISCOVERIES MADE IN THE BUILDING OF THE OLDEST EXISTING THEATRE IN FRANCE", "signature_source": "Barrett H. Clark ; Oliver W. Larkin", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 94, "page_imprimee": "178", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.94", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 206, "texte": "THE COMEDIE FRANQAISE\nIN PARIS.\nA PILGRIMAGE TO THE THEATRE AND A\nRECORD OF DISCOVERIES MADE IN THE\nBUILDING OF THE OLDEST EXISTING\nTHEATRE IN FRANCE.\nBy Barrett H. Clark. Illustrations by Oliver W. Larkin."}, {"page_pdf": 94, "page_imprimee": "178", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.94", "debut_caractere": 299, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4689, "texte": "find that one house in every five, at a\nconservative estimate, ought to have its\ndistinguishing badge (J). If all these hou-\nses were purchased by the State and\nconverted into museums the people of\nParis would have to move to the\ncountry ; this is the reason, or one of\nthe reasons, why many a landlord has\nrefused to claim a noble lineage for his\nproperty. One in particular has effected\nwhat is really a posthumous eviction.\nI now write in the house where\nRacine lived during the last six years\nof his life, where Clairon lived for\nthirty, where Adrienne Lecouvrear met\nher tragic death, and where Voltaire\nwas a frequent visitor. Before me are\ndocuments proving these facts, but the\nlandlord, having hidden his marble\ntablet in the cellar, points down the\nstreet to No. 13, telling his illustrious\ntenants that they must apply elsewhere\nfor admission; he will have none of\nthem. For some time, (until there was\nsome talk in the Chamber of Deputies\nof purchasing such houses at a nominal\nsum) this, same landlord was proud to\nshow visitors the room in which he\nwas 44 sure the author of 4 Ph£dre *\nbreathed his last, \" and he would\ndoubtless have written indignant letters\nto the papers protesting against any\nupstart historian who dared question\nthe authenticity of the Hotel de Ranes.\nBut now it is different I\nNext door is the house, undistin-\nguished by any tablet, where Balzac\nlived as printer and publisher; you\nmay have your shoes half-soled under\nits eaves. Five minutes* walk from\nthere you may buy peas and onions in\nthe (unmarked) mansion where Lau-\nrence Sterne lived and wrote part of\nthe 44 Sentimental Journey **. Without\nknowing it you may sleep in Synge's\nroom for seven francs a night, rent Tur-\ngenev*s apartment, have breakfast in\nFlaubert's library, and drink an aperitif\nat the same bar over which Verlaine\nreceived his absinthe. All this is very\nTHAT practical common sense for\nwhich the French are celebrated is\nseen to best advantage in the use to\nwhich the nation has put her shrines\nand public monuments. The unin-\nformed tourist who has visited the\nLouvre and paid his respects to the\nVictor Hugo house in the Place des\nVosges is wont to imagine that every\nother double-starred attraction has like-\nwise been converted into a museum\nand cared for by the State. As he\nwanders through the streets, reading\nthe marble tablets that mark the house\nwhere 44 Alfred de Musset, born at\nsuch a place on such a day, died, \"\nor where Th£ophile Gautier spent two\nyears of his life, he is likely to be\nimpressed with the idea that the French\nare an altogether pious people of cul-\ntured historians, guardians of a brilliant\npast, eager to perpetuate in marble the\nlandmarks that recall an illustrious past.\nThe sentimental tourist, asl Henry\nJames would have called him, does not\nknow, however, that the houses now\ndistinguished by the familiar yellow\ntablet represent possibly less than one\npercent of the total that deserve com-\nmemoration. Let him enquire into the\nhistory of the houses in but a single\nold street in Paris and he will soon\npleasant and as it should be; the Pa-\nrisian cannot be expected to turn his\ncity into a museum; after all, Balzac\nand Voltaire and the rest are dead,\nand the butcher and post-card vendor\nmust live.\nTHE OLD STAGE IN PARIS.\nThere is one such monument of\nwhich I would try to render some\naccount, for it cannot long survive the\nuses to which it has been put. Were\nit not that the stage, and the shell at\nleast of the whole structure of the old\nCom£die Frangaise were still in exis-\ntence, the statement that Paris has no\nold theatres would be quite true. The\nstatement was made not long ago by\nan authority on stage history that the\noldest theatre in Paris dates only from\nthe end of the eighteenth century. The\nruin I am to tell about dates from the\nseventeenth (2).\nThe remains of what was for a\nhundred years the most brilliant, most\nimportant and most celebrated theatre\nin Europe, may be seen to-day not\nfifty yards from the* Boulevard St.\nGermain. The somewhat modernized\nfacade is distinguished from a row of\nsimilar facades by a tablet, now yellow\nwith age and all but undecipherable,\non which you may read that this is\n\n(i) See Volume Xf No. 3. TurgoVs\nPlan de Paris.\n(2) It has still older ruins, What we\nexpect (and we find in Italy alone) are\nthe Theatres of the 16th and iyth centu+\nries in fit working order. (Editor)."}, {"page_pdf": 95, "page_imprimee": "179", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.95", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6080, "texte": "the 44 former Hotel of the Comddiens\nFrangais, ** and that it was occupied\nby the King's Troupe between 1689\nand 1770. The wooden stage, inside\nstands almost as it stood when the\nTroupe moved to better quarters a\nhundred and fifty years ago. The\noriginal balconies and corridors have\nbeen made over into apartments, and\nthe parterre—or pit—is at present an\nopen courtyard. The stage and dres-\nsing rooms, fly galleries and loft above\nhave all been converted into store-\nrooms and offices for the use of a\nwholesale book distributor.\nThere are people working from\nmorning to night on the stage where\nClairon and Lecouvreur, Mol6 and\nLekain achieved fame; there are fa-\nmilies living in rooms the floors of\nwhich have been trod by Rousseau,\nDiderot, Voltaire and Beaumarchais,\ncooking their meals in kitchens once\noccupied by boxes where sat the kings\nof France—and their mistresses. The\nstairs up which Voltaire climbed to\ndiscuss with Clairon the play he was\nwriting and the very dressing-room in\nwhich that imperious minx received\nher illustrious admirers, are now used\nby porters bearing heavy boxes of books\nand made into platforms for the storing\nof old furniture and discarded office\nsupplies. With one exception, no one\nof all 1 addressed in the building knew\nthat he was rubbing elbows with the\nghosts of the past, and no one seemed\nto care.\nIt was by accident that I learned\nof the existence of the stage of the old\nCom£die. I had indeed often noticed\nthe tablet, but I assumed that the\nbuilding had been erected over the spot\nonce occupied by the theatre, and was\nnot, indeed, the famous building itself.\nTREADING HALLOWED\no GROUND. o\nOne day it occurred to me to enter\nthe courtyard of No. 14 Rue de\n1'Ancienne Com£die. The illustrator\nof these notes had armed himself with\na ground plan of the structure as it\nexisted in the middle of the eighteenth\ncentury, and together we succeeded in\nidentifying air the important parts of\nthe stage and 44 house \" that have been\npermitted to remain.\nPassing the concierge's door we\nenter the courtyard, the ground of\nwhich, now covered with cobblestones,\nmarks the exact location of the old\nparterre. This is a space twenty-seven\nby thirty-five feet square, formerly\nroofed in; now, of course, there is\nonly the open sky. At the other end\nof the court, facing us as we enter,\nis a series of three high windows and\na glazed door which, when thrown\nopen in warm weather, allows us to\nsee the stage opening as it was 200\nyears ago. On the occasion of our\nfirst visit the snow was falling, to that\nit was necessary to knock at the door.\nNo one answers our summons and\nwe walk boldly in. The floor, we\nperceive, is modem, but just under it\nis another, of solid oak planks; the\noriginal stage. Through packing boxes\nand heaps of books we are able to\nobserve the slant of the floor, a con-\nsiderable grade from the highest point\nup-stage right down to the curtain line.\nWe ask an employee for permis-\nsion to 44 look around \"—we are stu-\ndents of the French theatre and would\nlike to make a few sketches of this\nstage. The employee knows nothing of\nany stage and informs us that it is\nforbidden to enter. Since, however,\nwe have already entered, he is a little\nperplexed—he knows no regulations\nbeyond the first, but takes it upon\nhimself to tell us that we must make\nformal application to the owner. We\nnext ask whether it is forbidden to\nlook elsewhere. Oh, not at ail-outside\nhis own precincts we are quite at\nliberty I One takes the small stairway\nto the right.\nThe stairway, we see, proclaims its\nauthenticity by the style of its iron\nrailings and the size and shape, of the\nterra cotta tiles. We refer to our plan\nand identify it as one of two that gave\naccess on the first floor to two stage\nboxes, on the next to the actors'\ndressing rooms, and at the top to the\ngalleries over the stage. Nothing re-\nmains of the stage boxes except two\nplatforms, now used as store-rooms.\nThe dressing rooms, what is left of\nthem, are used as cloak rooms for the\nclerks. We mount to the second\nstory—which is, by European count,\nthe third, and, from behind a modern\ntemporary wall running round a large\noffice, we cat-ch sight of the ends of\nhuge beams supporting the roof.\nThe office occupies the greater part\nof the space once used for manipula-\nting such scenery as was used in\nelaborate productions. As we look out\nof the windows into the courtyard we\nare standing immediately over the old\nproscenium arch, and the solid beams\nthat formed its basis are now used to\nsupport the new floor. The windows\nthat allow us a view of the 4 4 house \"\nhave of course been put in during the\n- last century.\nA young man in the office appears\nto understand the object of our visit\nand one is not surprised to learn that he\nis working in a theatre. It is through\nhis courtesy and interest that we are\nallowed to break the rules of the house\nand descend to the floors below. We\nnow go down the stairway to the left.\nFrom this side the actors' dressing rooms\nhave entirely disappeared ; nothing re-\nmains but the floors, which are utilized\nfor some dark purpose which we are\nunable to fathom. Reaching the floor\nimmediately below, we stand in a\ngallery that was used by the manipu-\nlators of lights and of the elaborate\nscenery that was introduced after the\nmiddle of the eighteenth century. This\ngallery is about fourteen feet above the\nlevel of the stage and extends around\nthree sides of it. On a level with the\neye are small modern windows set in\njust above the bottom of the old\nproscenium opening. Between the floor\nof this gallery and that of the office\nabove—a space of less than eight\nfeet—is a forest of beams and rafters,\nuntouched, even by paint, since 1770.\nOn some of the cross beams overhead\nwe discover wooden pulleys used for\nraising and lowering stage-sets. Some\nof these are all but hidden by the\ninnumerable book bins and packing\nboxes, the weight of which threatens\nthe collapse of the entire gallery.\nONTO THE FORBIDDEN STAGE.\nWe now descend into the forbidden\narea of the stage itself. Here again\nare book bins and boxes, stoves, a small"}, {"page_pdf": 96, "page_imprimee": "180", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.96", "debut_caractere": 56, "fin_caractere_exclue": 5836, "texte": "elevator and many desks. We peer\ninto dark corners, measuring distances\nand deciphering our plan, and discover\nthat this space is practically intact;\nnothing has been done to the stage\nexcept to encumber it with the para-\nphernalia of a combined storeroom and\noffice. Take down the glass doorsy seal\nup the modern windows, clear out the\nbooks, desks and inclosed offices, and\nyou might produce a play before an\naudience standing, as audiences did, in\nthe pit, out in the open courtyard.\nLet us leave the stage for a mo-\nment and step into the street. The\nfacade is that of the ordinary seven-\nteenth century house, not appreciably\ndifferent from many another in the\nneighborhood.\nA new story has been added to the\nold structure, or rather the original\nmansards have been incorporated into\na new top story. The little shops\noccupying the ground floor were for-\nmerly used as entrances and ticket\nwindows. In the front part of the\nbuilding—between the street and the\ncourtyard—there is a staircase which\ngave access to the second and third\ntiers of boxes.\nOn the death of Moli&re in 1673,\nthe troupe he had organized and trained\nwas expelled from the Palais-Cardinal\n(now the Palais-Royal) at the instiga-\ntion of the composer Lully. Lully\nhad his own theatre at the time in\nthe Rue de Vaugirard, but feeling that\nhe was out of the fashionable district\nhe insisted on appropriating the theatre\nin which his old rival had found fame\nand success.\nMoli&re's successor, Lagrange, is\nforced to look for a new home. He\nfinds a tennis court in the Rue des\nFosses de Nesle (now the Rue Ma-\nzarine). This tennis court is converted\ninto a theatre, and the old Moli&re\ntroupe, joining forces with the Com£-\ndiens du Marais, sets up business for\na short time as the Theatre Gu£n£gaud.\nIn 1680 Louis XIV. issues a decree\nconsolidating the actors of the Th&tre\nGu6n6gaud with those of the Hotel\nde Bourgogne. It is this famous decree\nthat marks the establishment of the\ntheatre now known as the Com6die-\nFrangaise, or the Theatre-Frangais.\nIn his will Cardinal Mazarin had\nestablished the College des Quatre\nNations. The college occupied the\nground now marked by the cupola of\nthe Institute. Unfortunately for the\ncomedians, their theatre was just 200\nyards from the sacred precincts of the\ncollege. Complaints were made and\nin 1687 Louis issued another decree\nrequiring the actors to seek other\nquarters. The next move was to a\npoint not three minutes walk up the\nsame street toward what is now the\nBoulevard St. Germain, to another\ntennis court, evidently outside the zone\nwhere the college youths were allowed\nto wander The Jeu de paume de\nl'Etoile occupied an irregularly shaped\nplot of ground between the old Rue\ndes Foss6s-Saint-Germain-des-pr£s and\ntwo houses on the old Rue des Mauvais\ngargons. The Rue des Foss6s is now\nthe Rue de Fancienne Com6die, the\nother is the Rue Gr£goire-de-Tours.\nThe architect, Francois d'Orbay, set to\nwork filling the old spaces at his\ndisposal and in 1689 the new theatre\ninaugurated the most brilliant period of\nits long career with a performance of\nRacine's \" Phidre \" and\n\" Medecin malgr£ lui \".\nThe theatre was considered one of\nthe most magnificent buildings of Europe.\nThe \" house \" included three balconies\nof loges, not including the stage boxes\nand benches on the stage itself. It is\nsaid that 2,000 spectators could be\naccommodated. This seems an exag-\ngeration, though it must be borne in\nmind that there were no seats in the\nparterre, and that many hundreds can\nbe crowded into a space 850 feet\nsquare. Besides, there is no reason to\nbelieve that 250 years ago the French\nnation was any more particular about\nthe comfort of its audiences than it is\nnow. The parterre gods of the day,\ncalled \" Knights of the Chandelier \"\nbecause of the huge cluster of wax\ncandles that dripped grease into the\npit, were so tightly fitted into their\npen as to make it impossible to faint\nwith decency when the air became, as\nit often did, overheated. The Theatre\ndes Vari6t£s, now doing business on\nthe Boulevards, has been modeled, so\nfar as crowding and ventilation are\nconcerned, on the old Com£die Fran-\ngaise.\nLet us now return to the stage.\nLook for a moment at the accompa-\nnying diagram, a copy of the -sketch\nmade by the architect Biondel in 1752.\nWith the exception of the beams that\nsupport the galleries just over the stage,\nthe two stairways (B and C), and the\ntwo wooden walls (A), little of the\nstructure of the upper part of the stage\nremains.\nThe long double lines to the right\nand left of the open part of the stage\n(marked U) mark the position of rail-\nings behind which, indicated by a\nseries of lines, were the stage benches.\nThese benches were the occasion of\none of the most interesting episodes of\nstage history, and this particular stage\nwas the scene of a drama more eventful\nthan most of the tragedies enacted\nupon it.\nYou will notice that the open space\nbetween the railings is very small com-\npared with the total area behind the\ncurtain line (D). The stage benches\nand boxes below them occupied all\nthe floor space except an opening fifteen\nfeet wide at the curtain and eleven\nup-stage. The benches were the most\ndesirable places in the theatre, and\nwere occupied by the rich merchants,\nthe nobility and others who wished to\nshow themselves to the 44 house #\\\n44 During the entire evening of a\nperformance \", says one writer, 44 there\nwas not a moment's silence on the\nstage, even during the most affecting\ntragic scenes. Rich merchants, witty\npetits-maitrcs, entered and left, followed\nby servants in elaborate attire, bustled\nto and fro, talked and joked, while\nthe actors endeavored to drown out\nthe confusion and attract the attention\nof the audience \".\nDramatists bitterly complain of the\nnuisance: Cr£biIIon cites the case of a"}, {"page_pdf": 97, "page_imprimee": "181", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.97", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 3843, "texte": "well dressed young man who entered\nafter the curtain had risen; as he was\nlooking for his seat the audience ima-\ngined him to be the lover in the play,\nVoltaire never wearies of repeating that\nhe is forced to write his plays with a\nview to the convenience of the spec-\ntators on the benches, and must often\neliminate an effective scene because it\nwould be ridiculed by the petits-maitres.\nIndeed, that strict adherence to the\nunities which every self-respecting eigh-\nteenth century dramatist is everlastingly\npreaching about is attributable in large\nmeasure to the cramped stage of the\nConfedie. What was worse, no actor\nwas ever free of interruption and few\nplays escaped a shower of comments\nfrom the benches.\nTHE NUISANCE SIDE OF\no PLAYGOING. o\nAs we look down from the dusty\nplatform that surrounds the stage on\nthree sides it is almost impossible to\nconceive the narrowness of the space\nat the disposal of the old actors.\nThere where the bookkeeper now sits\nin his glass cage were rows of benches,\nand this side of the elevator shaft marks\nthe railing of the benches on the left.\nIt must have been at the very spot\nwhere now hangs a 44 No Smoking \"\nsign that a certain actor, playing the\npart of a messenger in a pseudo-Roman\ntragedy, arrived at a critical moment\nand found his way blocked by spec-\ntators. The actors down-stage waited\nfor his entrance and cue, and could\nnot continue. A tense moment, relieved\nimmediately after by a clarion voice\nfrom the pit:\n44 Make way for the messenger! \"\nWhat matter if the scene was spoiled !\nThis intolerable nuisance was borne\nfor over a hundred years, just as the\ninnumerable abuses of to-day are borne\nand will continue to be borne—for\nfinancial reasons* Everyone knows that\ngoing to the theatre in Paris is an\nordeal, but so long as the public is\nwilling to pay ushers for the privilege\nof being shown to the wrong seat, no\nchange will be made.\nSo it was with the benches, only\nin that case it was the actors who\nbenefited, and not, as to-day, the\nmanagers. However, in 1759 the\nCount de Lauraguais offered the means\nof effecting an immediate reform. H/s\ndrew up a report which he submitted\nto the court, and was permitted to pay\nfor the renovation of the stage. At a\ncost of 60,000 livres the stage was\nfinally cleared of the benches. The\nfirst performance on the new stage was\ndesigned to show what could be done\nunder conditions allowing the intro-\nduction of scenery and greater freedom\nof action to the players. Says the\nMercure de France after the opening\nnight: 44 Ijt was to be feared that the\nstage might seem too bate with no\none on it bat the actors ; however, it\nwas only necessary to witness upon it\nA comedy \", &c. The italics are mine.\nThe bench frequenters were furious\nand gathered in the old Cafe Procope,\njust opposite the theatre (and still in\nexistence) where, it is said, 44 the\nmirrors and chandeliers were the only\nsufferers \" in the row.\nIt was after 1759 that the pulleys\nfor handling scenery were installed in\nthe first gallery, of which I have already\nspoken. Just over our heads, under\nthe floor above, we discover two wooden\npulleys. On the opposite side of the\ngallery is one more, intact like the\nother two: but the fourth is gone.\nThese pulleys, 1 dare say, would not\nrevolutionize stage history; they are\ncertainly not the sort of relic the State\npreserves in glass cases but they do\nmean something. They mark an epoch,\nthey symbolize an event in theatrical\nhistory as momentous as the discovery\nof the cyclorama or the introduction\nof real water into a storm scene, and\nI think with regret of that fourth pulley\nwhich I am told, was 44 taken by the\nproprietor for his personal needs\n1 have often wondered what these\n44 personal needs \" were, and wondered\nagain how long before his 44 personal\nneeds \" will demand the utter demo~\nlition of the old building."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c119", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c119", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "178", "page_fin": "178", "image_debut": 94, "image_fin": 94, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.25.1", "titre_corps": "Facade of the Theatre during the 18th Century", "titre_sommaire": "Facade of the Theatre during the 18th Century", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 94, "page_imprimee": "178", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.94", "debut_caractere": 208, "fin_caractere_exclue": 297, "texte": "Facade of the Theatre during the 18th\nCentury. After an old engraving in\nl' Encyclopèdie."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c120", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c120", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "178", "page_fin": "178", "image_debut": 94, "image_fin": 94, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.25.2", "titre_corps": "Façade of the Theatre as it actually is", "titre_sommaire": "Façade of the Theatre as it actually is", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 94, "page_imprimee": "178", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.94", "debut_caractere": 4691, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4759, "texte": "Façade of the Theatre as it actually is.\nView from the Cafè Procope."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c121", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c121", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "179", "page_fin": "179", "image_debut": 95, "image_fin": 95, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.25.3", "titre_corps": "17th Century Staircase leading to the Dressing-rooms", "titre_sommaire": "17th Century Staircase leading to the Dressing-rooms", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 95, "page_imprimee": "179", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.95", "debut_caractere": 6082, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6171, "texte": "17th Century Staircase leading to the\nDressing-rooms. The door gives accesa\nto the Stage."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c122", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c122", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "180", "page_fin": "180", "image_debut": 96, "image_fin": 96, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.25.4", "titre_corps": "The stage as it looks today from the Gallery above it", "titre_sommaire": "The stage as it looks today from the Gallery above it", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 96, "page_imprimee": "180", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.96", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 54, "texte": "The stage as it looks today from the\nGallery above it."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c123", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c123", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "180", "page_fin": "180", "image_debut": 96, "image_fin": 96, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.25.5", "titre_corps": "Plan of the Stage. 1752", "titre_sommaire": "Plan of the Stage. 1752", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 96, "page_imprimee": "180", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.96", "debut_caractere": 5838, "fin_caractere_exclue": 5893, "texte": "Plan of the Stage. 1752. After an\nEngraving by Biondel."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c125", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c125", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "182", "page_fin": "182", "image_debut": 98, "image_fin": 98, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.26", "titre_corps": "CORRESPONDENCE", "titre_sommaire": "CORRESPONDENCE", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 98, "page_imprimee": "182", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.98", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1543, "texte": "CORRESPONDENCE.\n\nA DICTIONARY OF THE DRAMA.\nFaithfully yours,\nOne of your Earliest Subscribers.\nTo the Editor of the Mask*\nSir :\nLAST April in an article in \" The Mask ** Professor\nAllardyce Nicoll informed us that he was engaged with\nsome twenty students in the preparation of an elaborate\nDictionary of the Drama.\nMore recently a friend sent me a four-leaf prospectus\nof Professor Nicoll's School of Dramatic Study and Re-\nsearch, and on page 2 of this I read that A Dictionary\nof British Drama is being prepared.\nI suppose these refer to one and the same work ; and\nyet what a vast difference exists twixt the subject \" Drama \"\nand the subject \" British Drama I must say I am some\nwhat disappointed.\nThe best \" Dictionary of British Drama \" that I have\ncome across was begun by Davenport Adams — (you\nhave spoken of this in \" The Mask \" already) and was\npublished by Chatto & Windus. The first and only vo-\nlume is decidedly usefull.\nI understand that much of the material for a second\nvolume has existed ever since the work was stopped by\nthe death of Mr. Davenport Adams. So that Professor\nNicoll's labours need not be as arduous as at first they\nseemed likely to be: more especially since all the facts about\nBritish Drama could get without much difficulty into two or\nthree volumes, whereas an adequate Dictionary of Euro-\npean Drama would require at least twelve volumes.\nMay 1 at the same time ask when Mr. Gordon\nCraig's School for the Art of the Theatre is going to\nreopen? It seems to some of us to be more needed than\nit ever was."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c127", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c127", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "182", "page_fin": "182", "image_debut": 98, "image_fin": 98, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.26.2", "titre_corps": "A DICTIONARY OF THE DRAMA", "titre_sommaire": "A DICTIONARY OF THE DRAMA", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 98, "page_imprimee": "182", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.98", "debut_caractere": 17, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1543, "texte": "A DICTIONARY OF THE DRAMA.\nFaithfully yours,\nOne of your Earliest Subscribers.\nTo the Editor of the Mask*\nSir :\nLAST April in an article in \" The Mask ** Professor\nAllardyce Nicoll informed us that he was engaged with\nsome twenty students in the preparation of an elaborate\nDictionary of the Drama.\nMore recently a friend sent me a four-leaf prospectus\nof Professor Nicoll's School of Dramatic Study and Re-\nsearch, and on page 2 of this I read that A Dictionary\nof British Drama is being prepared.\nI suppose these refer to one and the same work ; and\nyet what a vast difference exists twixt the subject \" Drama \"\nand the subject \" British Drama I must say I am some\nwhat disappointed.\nThe best \" Dictionary of British Drama \" that I have\ncome across was begun by Davenport Adams — (you\nhave spoken of this in \" The Mask \" already) and was\npublished by Chatto & Windus. The first and only vo-\nlume is decidedly usefull.\nI understand that much of the material for a second\nvolume has existed ever since the work was stopped by\nthe death of Mr. Davenport Adams. So that Professor\nNicoll's labours need not be as arduous as at first they\nseemed likely to be: more especially since all the facts about\nBritish Drama could get without much difficulty into two or\nthree volumes, whereas an adequate Dictionary of Euro-\npean Drama would require at least twelve volumes.\nMay 1 at the same time ask when Mr. Gordon\nCraig's School for the Art of the Theatre is going to\nreopen? It seems to some of us to be more needed than\nit ever was."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c129", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c129", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "182", "page_fin": "182", "image_debut": 98, "image_fin": 98, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.27", "titre_corps": "FOREIGN NOTES", "titre_sommaire": "FOREIGN NOTES", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 98, "page_imprimee": "182", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.98", "debut_caractere": 1545, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4249, "texte": "FOREIGN NOTES\n\nMILANO\nO. Salamim.\nWE live in the most active city in Italy and yet we\ndo not advance very much in theatrical things. We\nare and like to remain Milanese — rather unconcerned\nas to what is going on in other places. We have our\ni eatro alia Scaia — which is larger than the Paris Opera\nHouse — and the singing is bfetter, the conductor a man\nof genius, and our direction is energetic and able. Yef\nsomehow while our work at the Scala pleases the middle\nclass shopkeeper and his family and strikes them as very\noriginal, and our old playhouse which is the perfection of\ncomfort, sanitation and regularity pleases the true Milanese\ngentiluomo we cannot exactly be said to do much in the\nf 1 .11 • \"«V\nway or brilliance.\nWe go on and on and we repeat masterpieces and do\nthem adequately — (the adequate with us is the high\nwater mark of endeavour and we are fantastically adequate)\nand oar theatre is a success, and yet something is lacking\n— a spark is lacking.\nReduce the whole proportions of this theatre to that\nof some small opera house in Voghera or Pesaro, reduce\nthe salaries and the expenses and the display and the\nnumbers of the performers, and any Milanese coming to\nour theatre wduld be in no way astonished. Toscanini\nwill always be Toscanini, that is to say, the first conductor\nof the age ; but he might be far better occupied conducting\nin a big hall like the Augusteo in Roma; in fact we are\nsure that his finer work would be heard better there.\nIn a theatre a master-conductor is more or less thrown\naway. What is needed in a theatre is the theatrical at\nits best; a musical, poetical, or a literary director is al-\nways an error.\nThere are other places for these great persons.\nThe Theatrical must dominate in a Theatre, and the\nTheatrical is, I regret to say it, the roguish ; the deity of\nthe place is not a solemn one, nor earnest, nor hectic:\nhe is easy going and nowadays a bit of a rascal.\nUnfortunately, Toscanini can never be that. He is the\nForbes Robertson of the Italian Theatre; a man who\nsomehow or other with all his immense adequacy is not\nheard at his best in the theatre.\n\nFROM LONDON.\nA leading London journal writes that a combination\nof Miss Gladys Cooper and Sir Gerald du Maurier\nin Mr, Frederick Lonsdale's new comedy 44 The Last\nof Mrs Cheyney \" may come about this season.\nIf it comes about, 44 this combination of three of the\noutstanding figures of the English Theatre \"it 44 should be\nthe big stage event of the autumn *\\\nFrom this statement one can guage how immense\nthe other events are likely to be.\n\nEric Blom in \"The Sackbut\".\nNOW THAT MADAME TUSSAUD'S IS LOST TO US,\nWHERE SHOULD WE TURN FOR AN ADEQUATE\nSUBSTITUTE, IF NOT TO COVENT GARDEN?"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c130", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c130", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "182", "page_fin": "182", "image_debut": 98, "image_fin": 98, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.27.1", "titre_corps": "MILANO", "titre_sommaire": "MILANO", "signature_source": "O. Salamim", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 98, "page_imprimee": "182", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.98", "debut_caractere": 1560, "fin_caractere_exclue": 3663, "texte": "MILANO\nO. Salamim.\nWE live in the most active city in Italy and yet we\ndo not advance very much in theatrical things. We\nare and like to remain Milanese — rather unconcerned\nas to what is going on in other places. We have our\ni eatro alia Scaia — which is larger than the Paris Opera\nHouse — and the singing is bfetter, the conductor a man\nof genius, and our direction is energetic and able. Yef\nsomehow while our work at the Scala pleases the middle\nclass shopkeeper and his family and strikes them as very\noriginal, and our old playhouse which is the perfection of\ncomfort, sanitation and regularity pleases the true Milanese\ngentiluomo we cannot exactly be said to do much in the\nf 1 .11 • \"«V\nway or brilliance.\nWe go on and on and we repeat masterpieces and do\nthem adequately — (the adequate with us is the high\nwater mark of endeavour and we are fantastically adequate)\nand oar theatre is a success, and yet something is lacking\n— a spark is lacking.\nReduce the whole proportions of this theatre to that\nof some small opera house in Voghera or Pesaro, reduce\nthe salaries and the expenses and the display and the\nnumbers of the performers, and any Milanese coming to\nour theatre wduld be in no way astonished. Toscanini\nwill always be Toscanini, that is to say, the first conductor\nof the age ; but he might be far better occupied conducting\nin a big hall like the Augusteo in Roma; in fact we are\nsure that his finer work would be heard better there.\nIn a theatre a master-conductor is more or less thrown\naway. What is needed in a theatre is the theatrical at\nits best; a musical, poetical, or a literary director is al-\nways an error.\nThere are other places for these great persons.\nThe Theatrical must dominate in a Theatre, and the\nTheatrical is, I regret to say it, the roguish ; the deity of\nthe place is not a solemn one, nor earnest, nor hectic:\nhe is easy going and nowadays a bit of a rascal.\nUnfortunately, Toscanini can never be that. He is the\nForbes Robertson of the Italian Theatre; a man who\nsomehow or other with all his immense adequacy is not\nheard at his best in the theatre."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c131", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c131", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "182", "page_fin": "182", "image_debut": 98, "image_fin": 98, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.27.2", "titre_corps": "FROM LONDON", "titre_sommaire": "FROM LONDON", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 98, "page_imprimee": "182", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.98", "debut_caractere": 3665, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4105, "texte": "FROM LONDON.\nA leading London journal writes that a combination\nof Miss Gladys Cooper and Sir Gerald du Maurier\nin Mr, Frederick Lonsdale's new comedy 44 The Last\nof Mrs Cheyney \" may come about this season.\nIf it comes about, 44 this combination of three of the\noutstanding figures of the English Theatre \"it 44 should be\nthe big stage event of the autumn *\\\nFrom this statement one can guage how immense\nthe other events are likely to be."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c133", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c133", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "182", "page_fin": "182", "image_debut": 98, "image_fin": 98, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.27.3", "titre_corps": "NOW THAT MADAME TUSSAUD'S IS LOST TO US", "titre_sommaire": "NOW THAT MADAME TUSSAUD'S IS LOST TO US", "signature_source": "Eric Blom", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 98, "page_imprimee": "182", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.98", "debut_caractere": 4107, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4249, "texte": "Eric Blom in \"The Sackbut\".\nNOW THAT MADAME TUSSAUD'S IS LOST TO US,\nWHERE SHOULD WE TURN FOR AN ADEQUATE\nSUBSTITUTE, IF NOT TO COVENT GARDEN?"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c135", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c135", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "183", "page_fin": "183", "image_debut": 99, "image_fin": 99, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.28", "titre_corps": "DESIGN BY FAOLO PARIGI FOR THE CEREMONY OF SOME GREAT PERSON IN THE CAPPELLA LA URENZIANAIN F1RENZE circa", "titre_sommaire": "DESIGN BY FAOLO PARIGI FOR THE CEREMONY OF SOME GREAT PERSON IN THE CAPPELLA LA URENZIANAIN F1RENZE circa", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 99, "page_imprimee": "183", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.99", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 559, "texte": "DESIGN BY FAOLO PARIGI FOR THE CEREMONY OF SOME GREAT PERSON IN THE\nCAPPELLA LA URENZIANAIN F1RENZE circa\nSomething which can be described as the Ugly Theatre, The family Parigi were called upon to decorate the grievous\nspectacles as well as the gay ones. This shows hozu they treated a funeral ceremony in a Florentine Church.\nBeing a spectacle it had to be dramatic,,,, theatrical. It was not held to be in bad taste. It expressed something\nin the hearts of the Italians, a people never prone to speculate too earnestly about-no thing at the , wrong moment."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c137", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c137", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "185", "page_fin": "189", "image_debut": 101, "image_fin": 105, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.29", "titre_corps": "BOOK REVIEWS", "titre_sommaire": "BOOK REVIEWS", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 101, "page_imprimee": "185", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.101", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6865, "texte": "BOOK REVIEWS.\n\nTHE DANCE by Cecil Sharpe &\nA. P. Oppe. Halton & Truscott\nSmith, Ltd. London 1924. 30/- net\nTHIS is a very delightful book which\nI, for one, would have printed on\nvery much thinner paper. There is no\nother fault (if this be a fault) that I can\nfind with the work of the publishers,\nwhich is done in a lavish manner, and\nwith taste.\nWhat is said in the book is exactly\nwhat was necessary to say, namely,\nthat we have in England \" sufficient\nmaterial from which to develop a spec-\ntacular dance for the theatre which\nshall consist of movements at once na-\ntural and expressive, and possessing the\nadvantage for England that they are\ncast in the dance idiom of our own\ncountry. \" All critics having any doubts\ncould not do better than copy this\nstatement and embellish it ten or\ntwelve times in the course of each year.\nForeign dances really do deserve a rest.\nIt really is time, I think, for an En-\nglish ballet. I should hate to become\nsceptical, but I am sceptical for this\nmoment. I am sceptical when I see\na thing called the English International\nOpera Company holding itself up on\nforeign operas. It is quite absurd to\ncall something which is not English, En-\nglish. Call it what you will but do\nnot call it English- There are heaps\nof other good names. And I dread lest\nan English ballet should be grown from\nRussian seed. It would be excessively\nstupid.\nCecil Sharpe, the author of this book,\ndevoted long years of his life, with\nvery little help from others, to searching\nfor an English folk dance tradition, for\nhe felt that, if he once found it and\ncould give it shape, an English ballet\nwould in time come into being.\nI haye often imagined an English\nballet, and I have a little imagination\nand can sometimes spend half an hour\nwatching the ballets which I myself\ncreate. Do not suppose me to be one\nof those superior beings who believe\nthat all is created solely through the\nimagination. Before all, perhaps, there\nis the dancer, and I should be sorry\nfor the public to be obliged to rely on\nme to cut the capers; but I can see\nthese ballets — these English ballets.\n< I see the curtain rising, I know the\ncolour. It is not the colour of the\nRussian ballet, nor that of the French;\nit is the English colour right enough.\nI see the first movement: that is En-\nglish, too. It is quite unlike anything\nthe great Diaghilev brought to England\nfrom Russia. It is rather more easy ;\nit is about six times as healthy. There\nwas always something just a trifle sick\nabout the Russians : a certain sickness\nsoused in perfumery. Of its kind it is\nwithout question the very last word,\nbut the kind has nothing whatever to\ndo with the English ballet which, as\nyou are doubtless aware, must have a\nmelancholy all it own and a merryness\nnot necessarily noisy.\nAnd I am told that Mr. Cochran\nhas started an English ballet. Well,\nwith all due respect to Mr. Cochran,\nI very much have my doubts. Mr.\nCochran, whom I have always thought\nowed much to influence of Mr. Duveen,\nis one of the most able men in the\ndramatic world to start a limited lia-\nbility company, but an English ballet\nis not in his line. Mr. Cochran is an\nimpresario : nothing certainly less — and\nnot more. It was Mr. Cecil Sharpe who\nwas the founder of the English ballet.\nNot that his rescuscitation of the Morris\ndance means very much. It would be\na mistake to take the English Morris\ndance as revived by Mr. Sharpe too\nseriously, but there are things in it which\ncan never be taken seriously enough.\nIn a little booklet by Ralph Gardiner,\ncalled \" The English Folk Dance Tra-\ndition \", the author says that one of\nthe great projects of the English Folk\nDance Society is the creation of an\nEnglish ballet comparable to those of\nRussia and Sweden. I do not like\nthat word u project \". Neither do I\nlike the suggestion that a dance society\nis to be left to the creating of this\nlong-waited-for ballet. I would ra-\nther Mr. Gardiner created it himself;\nor, if Mr. Gardiner is not a great dan-\ncer, that he should create it together\nwith one great dancer, preferably a\nman. Now and again societies give\nus original performers but not habitually.\nThe greatest French actor of the eigh-\nteenth century, Le Kain, came from a\nprivate society theatre, but somehow I\nlook for a great dancer to appear any\nday from the ranks of a pantomine\nchorus in Huddersfield, or Nottingham,\nor Bradford. Such a man would not\nbe in love with the Russian ballet. If\nanything he would rather fear it and\nbe silent where Chelsea gushes. And\nto such a man this book by Sharpe\nwould mean very little ; and the truth\nis that all this book can do is to keep\nin front of our eyes the fact that there\nis such a thing as the dance, and that\nit was very wonderful in France, and\nwas courageous in Italy, and charming\nin Vienna. Such a book can keep\nus all talking at the dinner table. It\nis like a little illustrated programme of\nan evening's entertainment which has\nlasted nineteen centuries, gone by in a\nflash like a bicycle goes by the win-\ndow, in a flash. The nineteen centuries\nof Dance and Ballet have gone by in\nthat flash, leaving England nothing\nbehind.\nI believe that there is really some-\nthing true in the fact that one must\nbe quick to catch a thing as it is going\nby; something true in it. Of course\nif you have a policeman at the\nend of the street and you give him\nhis orders he will stop the bicycle, but\nwhat worries me is that he might not\nbe able to arrest the intelligence of a\ncouple of centuries.... still one never\nknows.\nThis book by Sharpe and Opp&\ncontains a great deal of history. A\nnumber of dates, allied with a number\nof names, and illustrated by a number\nof superb reproductions; for there are\nseventy-five plates, and seven illustra-\ntions in the text, and the four colou-\nred plates engraved and printed by\nReiach are really charming; and these\nthings all help to make it very well\nworth its price, and I bless the au-\nthors for giving us a good index.\nHas the book sold well? I hear\nso often of books that do not sell well,\nand that always makes me worry about\npaper and the binding of books; and,\nas I said at the beginning I thought\nthat this paper was rather too heavy,\ntoo rich, I must now point to an extra\nfault; I think the binding is too ex-\npensive. If paper and binding had\nbeen less, could not the book have\ncome out at half the price —at 15/ -\nSuch a price is more within the reach\nof another four or five hundred people.\nAnd, still thinking about paper and the\nbinding of books, 1 wonder if it would\nnot be possible to bring the book\nout for 5/ -, giving a little less pe -\nhaps, and certainly eliminating more an 1\nmore of the swank. It's swank tha:\ncosts such a lot nowadays. Can't gc\nto a theatre ! Why not ? Plush seats,\nBristol board programmes, one shilling.\nAxminster carpets on staircase. Two\nhundred extra lamps for the auditorium.\nCostumes for the people who show"}, {"page_pdf": 102, "page_imprimee": "186", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.102", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6743, "texte": "you into your seat. Evening dress for\nthe manager; motor car to and from\nthe place. Hoity, toity. What is the\nmeaning of all this swank ? It is not\nworth anything, and yet millions of\npounds are wasted on it. You tell me\nthat nobody would visit the not-Swanky\ntheatre, that nobody would buy swank-\nless books. I would not like you to\nconsider me at all rude, but if you are\na good friend of mine I tell you that\nyou are deluded. If you had twoo or\nthree days to spare (and if I had) I\nwould go through all the details of the\nproduction of books and the manage-\nment of theatres, and I would show\nyou step by step where all this swank\nwas unnecessary and how it totted up\nto the waste of many millions of\npounds.\nI only regret the swellness of this\nparticular book because it is a book I\nshould like to see many thousand peo-\nple possessing. The same publishers\nissue another book on 44 Old French\nline Engravings\", this they limit to\n1250 copies, and issue at three gui-\nneas and seven guineas, which seems\nto me a very proper thing to do, be-\ncause old French line engravings are\nthings which very few cultured people\nlove to ponder over; and their book\nof 44 Old French Colour Prints *\\ by\nCampbell Dodgson, also limited, is quite\nreasonable at three guineas ; but 44 The\nDance which is a popular thing, be-\nlongs to the public, and the public\nshould be able to buy all its popular\nthings very cheaply.\n\nFUCINI. NOVELLE E POESIE,\nEdited by Henry Furst D. Litt. : Uni-\nversity of Chicago Italian series.\nTHE little books of this series are\nedited by Mr Ernest Hatch Wil-\nkins. And it is, to judge from this\nvolume, a really delightful series.\nScholarly, not too bulky, pleasant good\npaper, solidly bound, copious notes,\nand Dr Furst's notes are clear, brief\nand entertaining: it is just what is\nwanted.\nFucini was born in 1843. 44 No\nwriter \" says Dr Furst, 44 excelled\nhim in simplicity and purity of style,\nin serenity of outlook, humour and\ngenuine feeling He wrote in the\nPisan dialect. 44 He taught belle let-\ntere (or, as he said, cartoline postali)\nat a boyfs school in Pistoia \". Then\nhe became an inspector of schools,\n14 an occupation for which his nature\nwas perfectly adapted \". He died in\n192L\nMatthew Arnold was older by\nr twenty years but they were contem-\ni poraries. I should like to read an\n5 imaginary conversation between these\nt two who were both poets and both\nE inspectors of schools.\n5 Dr Furst gives us three out of the\nr hundred sonnets of Fucini and ten of\n• the tales and a selection from Fucini's\n► impressions of Napoli. Ever since the\n: sonnets appeared in 1872 they must\n: have proved a source of inspiration to\n' hundreds of comedians; Musco, Fer-\nravilla, Petrolini, who have assuredly\n■ held the book in their hands as so\nmuch treasure; and it is only when\nsuch comedians read such verses aloud\nthat we, the poor public, ever get the\nfull value of them.\nFor there is something loud in\nthem : and the loud has more in it\nthan the timid suspect, for to the timid\nthere is mostly rudeness ia the loud.\nFor my part I want to hear more\nsonnets, verses, tales of genius spoken\naloud, but not by the poets : by the\nactors and to people who delight to\nlisten as the Italians do. I cannot\nabide to be listening with folk who\nare waiting for something pathetic,\nsententious, witty or biting. The loud\nis anyhow a guarantee that we are to\nbe spared these things : I feel safe with\nthe loud the moment it strikes up. It\nis after all only the old elephant of\nthe jungle : but the pathetic, the sen-\ntentious and the witty, as they start,\nremind me too immediately of the\ncrocodile, the lion and the tiger cat.\nI have never loved the lion to the\nextent that tradition does. He is\nsupposed to be so bold, so direct,\nwhereas he approaches his prey in a\ntortuous way. Ferravilla would be\nalways likening people to animals, I am\ntold. 44 Look —a horse \" he would say,\nor 44 a grey cat Many an actor has\nthis instinct and looks quickly for the\nanimal each man stands for.\n\nTHE CALL OF THE NIRVANA,\nDrama in Five Acts by Rudolf Broda,\nEnglish version with the collaboration\nof Selma B. Stone. The Four Seas\nCo. Boston.\nTHIS publishing house in its announce-\nments, prospectuses and wrappers\ntells the public that this series of books,\nie The Contemporary Series, are books\nof belles-lettres,—poetry, plays, essays,\nissued in an attractive format and\navailable at a popular price. But when\nI search to discern how popular is this\nprice nothing informs me.\nI am however rewarded, for I find\nsomething else, which is, that these\n• books include a playlet by Benavente,\ni one by Gordon Bottomley and one by\nf Von Hofmannsthal.\ni M The Call of the Nirvana \" is\nrather more than a bit dull: it is the\n! copyright of Ernst Bircher, Verlag\nAktiengesellchaft in Berne. It reads\nbadly. It might, who knows, act well\nand it might not. I can conceive no-\nthing more undramatic, but then I can\nconceive nothing less attractive than\nthe 44 heavy antique wove paper the\n44 coloured wrappers 99 and the 44 spe-\ncial designs\" which are all made a\ngreat point of in the announcements.\nIn 1923 the same firm issued 4< The\nArt of Cineplastics \" by Elie Faure\ntranslated from the French by Walter\nPach, Price I/—. (They announced\nprices in those days). A rare 1000\ncopies were issued — 44 1000 copies\nonly '* — and 25 on Stratford Paper\nwhatever that may be. M. Faure says\nin this booklet that Chaplin (re Charlie)\nmakes him think of Shakespeare.... he\nhas the same bewildering and yet lucid\nlyricism that Shakespeare had 41 Lucid\nLyricism *#! and there is something in\nMr Walter Pach that reminds me of\nShakespeare,—the silver sound, I think,\n44 and music with its silver sound \".\nBut the golden silence of Chaplin,\nhow that can be compared with Shakes-\npeare who is all words puzzles me.\nCompare Charlie with an actor and\nI'm with you, Elie. Compare him\nwith Ferravilla.... but where has Charlie\nsuddenly gone to ?\n\nAROUND THEATRES by Max\nBeerbohm. Heinemann.\nAvery remarkable book of Dra-\nmatic Criticisms appeared in Lon-\ndon in the year 1924 and no one\nnoted it. It was called 44 Around\nTheatres *\\ was in two volumes, and\nis by Mr. Max Beerbohm.—Well, I\nalmost wonder if I need go on.\nIs it necessary today to explain why\nany book by Mr Beerbohm must be\nthe best book of the year. Have we\nforgotten that there is an art of wri-\nting ?\nAs a rule we cannot write and I\nam almost convinced that the thing we\ncall thinking is not exactly thinking.\nBut Mr. Bernard Shaw, Sir A. W.\nPinero, Mr Rudyard Kipling, and a\ndozen more \" great writers\" and\n44 thinkers '* are, I believe, convinced\nthat they can both write and think:\nand, being so convinced, they set to\nwith a will, and, thinking it all out,\nthey then write it all down. As Iam\ndoing here."}, {"page_pdf": 103, "page_imprimee": "187", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.103", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6671, "texte": "But what troubles me is that I know\n1 am doing it badly. No such doubt\n'roubles them—as she said \" no bloom-\nng fear\nWhat I want to be saying in two\nwords, and take a hundred and miss\ndoing it, is that I think Beerbohm is\none of the best brains and one of the\nfew perfect writers we have had, and\nI cannot say it. To plump it out would\nbe of no good. Even a drama must\nhave a beginning, a middle and an\nend.\nAnd I am so impatient; I want the\naudience to come in with me to all\nour Theatres—to this one here—to sit\ndown—hold up their hands to a cur-\ntain on which are flashed the words\n\" All's understood \" and go out again\nand enjoy themselves there. As I am\ndoing here.\nBut Mr Shaw, Sir A. W. Pinero\nand the others don't want that at all.\nGood gracious no. They want nothing\nto be understood until they have for-\nced us all to come to heel —to enter\na parody of the real playhouse, to sit\nthere three hours and go out more\nconfused than before. Then and then\nonly may we go home and take twenty-\nfive years waiting for the light to\ndawn.... and slowly, slowly get the\nglimmering that we—just—have—wa-\nsted— twenty-five — years listening to\nmodern dramatists talking about prac-\ntically nothing at all.\nSome of us arrive at this by a sort\nof short cut to happiness and avoid\ngoing to listen to modern dramatists\ntalking. I am one of these. Some\ntwenty-six years ago I heard a play\nby Mr Pinero and three years later\none by Mr Shaw, and I never want\nto hear another. Some thirty years\n♦ago 1 read a page by Mr. Max Beer-\nfbohm and I never intend to miss ano-\nther.\nExplain why it is that these bore\nus and the other enchants. Or ra-\nther let me do so in two lines. It\nis because Mr Beerbohm is a born\nartist and Mr. Shaw and Sir A. W.\nPinero and many of the other admira-\nble gentlemen in the Dramatic field\nnever were and so never can be\nanything in any way whatever ap-\nproaching to the condition of artists.\nAnd so while Mr Shaw for three\nyears wrote a dramatic criticism each\nweek in the \" Saturday Review \", re-\ntiring from the post to give place to\nBeerbohm who for twelve years wrote\na dramatic criticism each week for the\nsame \" Saturday Review \", the Shaw\nessays count as nothing and the Beer-\nbohm essays are well-nigh perfect.\nShaw, who looks like Hercules,\ngives in after three years of it; Beer-\nbohm, who looks like anything but\nHercules, beats him by enduring nine\nyears longer than the giant was able\nto ....this is of course a point everyone\nwill have noted.\nI regret that these two new volumes\nare two out of a rare set of nine, for\nthose who should know of these Dra-\nmatic Criticisms will not come to know\nof them until Messrs Heinemann is-\nsue a popular edition ; and let us hope\nthis will appear during 1926. I do\nhope this with all my heart.\nI had intended to lift tempting pas-\nsages from these essays but I will not:\nyou must somehow get hold of a copy\nand read all the essays. There is one\non Henry Irving which you will read\nseveral times. I advise you to read it\nafter you have read Mr Shaw's article\non \" Mr Irving takes paregoric \" dated\nMay 4th 1895. In that article Mr\nShaw is constrained to state, of the\nStory of Waterloo, that \" there is\nabsolutely no acting in it—none what-\never \" ; he asserts, too, that a call-boy\ncould have performed a certain passage\nin that play. In fact Mr Shaw, besides\nbeing no artist, is woefully ignorant of\nacting ; yet he assumes, when he writes,\nall the assurance of one who knows\nall about it.\nMr Beerbohm, on the other hand,\nis a born actor, and, so far as I know,\nmakes no pretention at all to being\nthat. Every fine artist has a bit of\ngenius for acting. Giotto and Cellini,\nFragonard, Mozart, all of 'em had it ;\nand poor Shaw is totally without that\nbit of genius.... for the reason above\nstated.\nI delight to see, in this the stupid\nage, our G. B. S. raised up to be a\ncentral figure.\nIf it were not a stupid age, Beer-\nbohm would in all probability have\nwrit us our plays ;... they would have\nbeen powerful humorous things.... no-\nthing would have been amiss. Instead\nof this we have his Dramatic Criticisms\n—two books just as wise as they are\nunaffected, as useful to the stage as they\nare useful to the student of the En-\nglish language. The student of English\nhas profitted ; the theatre, as represented\nby those who elbow their way in\nand out of its stagedoor, has not\nprofitted.\nBut those of us who do care very\nmuch that the playhouse shall recover\nitself, as assuredly it shall, offer to\nMr. Beerbohm our admiration and our\nthanks for the lessons he gave us every\nSaturday for twelve years and which\nsome day we hope to show him we\nhave more or less understood.\n\nRING MASTERS.\nRICHARD WAGNER\n& JAMES .\nMy Circus Life by James Lloyd with\na preface by G. K. Chesterton,\nNoel Douglas. Price 5j*\nWagner's Music Drama of the Ring\nby L. Archier Leroy ; engravings by\nPaul Nash. (Noel Douglas) Price / 2 j-6*\nNOEL Douglas of 38 Great Ormond\nStreet, London is a new-comer in\nthe Publishers' Ring. He enters the magic\ncircle with a crack of the whip. And\nout trot some of the prettiest little po-\nnies ever I did see, in the shape of\nbooks as buxom as good work and\nmaterials and watchful eyes can make\nthem.\nWhen we see good craftsmanship in\nthe publishing or theatrical line or, for\nthat matter, in the way of restaurants,\nHotels, or Governments, our minds\noften turn to thinking of the unseen\nworkmen who can make or mar all\ncooperative work.\nIs it not some sort of toast to absent\nguests some of us offer silently to the\ngood workmen on seeing their work :\n— are the curses not loud but deep to\nthe bad workmen.\nAnd of course the good ones know\nof this—feel it in their bones—be they\nhidden by a big curtain or thick walls,\nby black ink or red tape. The bad\nworkmen never know what they get\nfrom us or what they misss That's\nwhat renders them surly and makes\nthem strike.\nAnd the good hidden workman, on\nhearing the rounds of applause, looks\nat the ring-master as he strides out to\nacknowledge with a bow the approval\nof the public for the work of himself\nand his men.\nOn the return of the ring-master\ndoes he go round to all and sundry\nand say \" It was you, old chap, who\nmade the show ;—the applause is yours,\nnot mine\nRing-masters may once in a blue\nmoon realize when some one member\nof a company has actually done the\nwork of forty—but he has to be very\nill first, ...laid up, unable to be on\nthe spot.\nThe ringmasters, for all the applause\nthey endure, are to be respected.\nWhen I first saw Barnum's Big Circus\nthere were three rings. In each a\nring-master. And here we have three\nof them too. Douglas, Wagner and\nLloyd.\nDouglas is dressy, Wagner classic,\nand Lloyd knows his business. Bar-"}, {"page_pdf": 104, "page_imprimee": "188", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.104", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6883, "texte": "num, the Deity of Showmen, presides\nover the whole business.\nThe cover of the Wagner book has\nmade itself up like the face of a clown\n—Grock couldn't have done it better ;\nthat of the Lloyd book is like the\ngreen satin trousers of Fratellini. And\nthe insides of both books bubble with\nfun. Even as all clowns get their laughs\nthrough being deadly in earnest, so do\nsome of the better kind of Ring-masters.\nAnd Wagner gets his that way.\nNot for Wagner is there any value\nin that vulgar saying about laughing\nlast. He never laughs, just as the classic\nold ring-master of 1870 never laughed.\nHe lets others do this and he lets others\ntalk and sing and run about. Wagner\n• has let Mr. Leroy his devoted admirer\ntalk, and for 196 pages Mr. Leroy\ntalks Wagner at us. He and Mr. Barbor\ncrack some jokes at his expense and the\nhorses trot round ; there's the circus.\nImmense as ever, Richard Wagner\ntowers in the centre.\nIt is a circus I never go to.\nOn the other hand nothing could\nkeep me out of Mr. James Lloyd's\ncircus.\nHis kind is the genuine article. The\njoke L. A. Leroy makes with H. R.\nBarbor about Wagner being a Man of\nthe theatre hits no one but the giant\nhimself. Lloyd is here to prove it a\njoke and a rather unkind one.\nOnly men like Lloyd are men of the\ntheatre. Festespiels by the hundred,\nBeechams by the score, Dalcroze's by\nthe million, will never be true theatre.\nA passage in Mr. Leroy's introduction\nstrikes me as curiously blind. He writes;\n\" When this (some trifle cr other) has\nbeen accomplished we may look for-\nward to a production of \" Tristan \",\nperhaps, which does not in any way\nremind us of an evening at Lord George\nSanger's estimable show \".\nHe fails to see, with most Wagne-\nrians, that what Wagner lacked was\nSanger's genius.... the genius of the\ngenuine Showman, and that his sole\nchance ofj being taken as a serious\ntheatre man lay in a forlorn hope that\nsome day he might remind us of Lord\nGeorge Sanger.\nI could understand a Wagner who\nbegan the way he did; who went :\nthrough it all and came out cured, and\nthen began his work. But to go on\nand in still further, to grow more and '\nmore Wagnerian when he should have 1\ngrown more and more Sangerian, that's <\nthe trouble.\nThese two books are made to live I\nside by side. Mr Lloyd's faults are t\nall the showman's—in a book he has -\n41 been and gone anJ done it\" as\nMr. Chesterton says in a charming\nIntroduction.\nAnd inasmuch as he has been a\nshowman and gone off afterwards and\ndone a book to say what exactly is\nthe whole life of a showman—a man\nof the theatre — by so much has he\nblazed light on the rare old smoke\nwhich Mr. Leroy and some three hun-\ndred other very clever men produce from\ntheir bonfires as they go round and\nround and round them throwing in this\nand that fillet, root and entrail, so as\nto make the charm work, and ultimately,\nwe hope, \" to share i* the gains *\\\n\" Up from the clown \" is the motto\nof the men of the theatre, not down\nfrom the Gods How long will it\ntake humanity (and one may add the\ncritic) to see this ?\nIs it not the cry \" up from the\nape \" that gives man at last a hope ?\nIf it is \" down from the Gods \" then\nall hope has gone. And if Wagner\nbe one of the Giants—if his spirit has\nreached so high as Bach, Beethoven and\nMozart, what the deuce are his gnomes\ndoing numbling round our cauldron ?\n\nJACOPONE DA TODI, POET\nAND MYSTIC. 1228*1306; by\nEvelyn Underbill. Dent Sons.\n16/— net.\nIF ever an intemperate man walked\nthis earth it was Jacopone da Todi\n—but there have been few whose in-\ntemperance took them off the earth as\ndid his. He soared with intempe-\nrance ; a lack of cardinal virtue laun-\nched him into Heaven. He loved so\nmuch that he loved all but himself.\nA writer in \" The Mask \" (J) recently\ntold us something of his story but I\nthink it very unlikely that its readers\nwill ever hear it retold correctly. Even\npagans nowadays are such scandal-\nmongers, such back-biters; and Jaco-\npone was that unforgivable thing, a true\nChristian. Mad, but Christlike in parts.\nIn some ways he resembles that\nfigure created by Walter Pater, Den-\nnys d*Auxerois. But Dennys was far\nmadder for he seems to have had two\nmasters—Jacopone had but one. Po-\nsitively he believed in love and not in\nFamour. (\nAnd this is one of the best books j\nwe have about him in our English (\nlanguage. It also contains thirty* four <\nof his songs in Italian and in English, j\nThe publishers announce only thirty- |\nthree but I counted twice and counted ,\nthirty-four. (\n_ s\nI regret that the talented authoress\nforgot to include J. A. Symonds' work\nin her \" Bibliography \" : and, while I\nam captious, let me indulge a regret\nthat so many publishers use quite such\nthick paper.\nI don't like rough blotting like pa-\nper to touch, and I don't think any\nlover of books likes it. Neither do 1\nlike the top edge of a fine book to be\npainted. If gilt, well and good; or if\nyeliowed, very carefully, it passes. But\nall depends on how these difficult jobs\nare done. Still the great firm of Dent\nis not alone in occasionally doing a\nlittle clumsy work. It is more or less\nthe fashion today. Not half enough\nconsideration is paid to those ancient\nproblems which beset even the devoted\n, lovers of good covers, paper, type, set-\nting and covers. *\nI have noticed that the Cambridge\nPress has a delicate taste in such mat-\nters. Chatto & Windus too. I often\nlike the books Jonathan Cape sends out.\nThe work of Mr Heinemann used to\nbe refined and some of it is so still.\nAll the good publishers try to pro-\nduce fine work of course ; but nowa-\ndays the right kind of brain and eye\nseems too often not to be employed by\nthese publishers.\nWe all know (or suppose) that good\ncardboard, cloth, paper and the like\nare hard to get and that all these\nthings are rather more expensive; but it&\nbrains I'm talking about, the special brain\nwhich understands what are* the quali-\nties needed in book work and how to\nhandle the book-binders and printers.\nThe Curwen Press has some real ta~\nlent, and so I take it that the Press\nhas men of brains and taste in control..\nLet printers experiment more with\nnewer papers, newer shapes, colours z\nand by new I mean those papers and\ncolours which are in front of their\nnoses and so near and so cheap that\nthey fail for this reason to be aware-\nof them.\nAnd why put on such heavy and\ncostly covers ? why such armour-clad\naffairs ? why not aim for delicacy and\ngood sense.\nThis is just what I feel Jacopone\nwould have said had he ever known\nof any but the most superb and yet\nthe cheapest binding, printing and\npaper. Experiment, for heaven's sake,,\ndear publishers. Put aside a small'\nsum of money a year to be used solely\nfor making experiments ; make them un-\nbeknown to us and on no account risk\nan experiment in public. Experiment is\nonly for the laboratory, and, if done\nseriously, would cost you only a few\nhundreds a year.\n(i) Vol. X. No. 2. April 1924. f"}, {"page_pdf": 105, "page_imprimee": "189", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.105", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6358, "texte": "THE GREATER LAW by Leo-\nnard C. White• Stage Play Publi-\nshing Bureau. London. //-: cloth\nbound, J?/-.\nI have read many a worse play, and\nsome merrier comedies,... for this is\ncalled \" a comedy in one act But\nI have some how never felt myself\nkept waiting quite as long for the point\nto be made ; and I fear I must call\nit a fault in this author to have kept\nthe audience in ignorance of where he\nwas going and what he was going to do.\nFor £ 1. 1. 0 amateurs may re-\npresent this piece, and I think they\nwill find their work none too easy.\nTo the lines in the stage direction\non page I Trevelyan crosses with the\ncups of tea I would here add and\nfalling over the sofa with them, en-\ntirely disappears. I feel it would be ef-\nfective, anyhow, and would risk it for\nthe sake of the audience who I believe\nwould never forget it.\n\nTHE ANGEL OF THE\nCHIMES by Fortune du Boisgoby.\nTHE CONVICT COLONEL: by\nFortune du Boisgoby.\nTHE NEAPOLITAN LOVERS by\nAlexandre Dumas. Stanley Paul &.\nCo. London. Translated by R. S.\nGarnett. Price 2/6 net each.\nFIRST the great old man.\nDumas was fifty-seven years old\nwhen he wrote this hook and there\nare some chapters as good as anything\nin \" Monte Cristo \" or t\\>e other mas-\nter pieces.\nHe was in Napoli, installed in the\nChiatamone Palace by Garibaldi, and\nthere he brought to life Ferdinando,\nKing of the two Sicilies and Jerusa-\nlem, Infante of Spain, Duke of Parma,\nof Piacenza, of Castro, and hereditary\nGrand Prince of Tuscany, that prepo-\nsterous but sensible Italian whom the\nlazzaroni of Napoli called \" II Re Na-\nsone \" King big Nose #\\\nThe genius with which Dumas brings\nhim to life is one of the things we\nshall never cease to marvel at : — how\ndoes he do it ? how can this being be\nmade to move, to walk right out into\nour room, and exist for us as he exi-\nsted in realty. For he is real and not\nmade up. He is preposterous ; yet he\nis likable, and admirable. He has most\nof the faults of a poor king and the\nqualities of a perfect one — He is, in\nfact, a king.\nMost novelists give us less than a\npoor actor does when playing the part.\nAll else in the book, good as it is,\nfades by the side this brilliant creation.\nThere slops Emma Hamilton, and\nthere stalks Nelson : Lord Acton looks\npoisonous and Queen Caroline daggers.\nThese are not fortunate enough to be\nmore than sketches ; yet put any one of\nthem into either of the two works by\ndu Boisgoby and our attention would\nbe rivetted on these figures and we\nshould take them to be alive. It is\nbecause Ferdinand is a round little\nmasterpiece that the others become flat.\nDu Boisgoby does not create any\nfigure at all worth while in his my-\nstery tales, but he is readable. Not\nso readable as Bennett with his \" Grand\nBabylon Hotel \", or Chesterton with\nhis \" Man who was Thursday \". What\nfirst class entertainers are these two\nthrillers! As good as either, to my\nthinking, is A. E. W. Mason's \" The\nHouse of the Arrow Mason doesn't\ndisappoint; \" The Winding Stair \"....\n\"The Villa Rose \"....Yes. I like Mason.\nBut I am forgetting that it is du\nBoisgoby I am supposed to say I like;\nand, if you don't give me Mason, Ches-\nterton, or. the author of \" The Cap-\ntive of Love du Boisgoby will do.\n\nTHE SISTERS' TRAGEDY\nand Three other Plays hy Richard\nHugh es. Heinemann Ltd. 6/- net,\n£- '\nALTHOUGH there are many lite-\nrary men, critics and theatrical\npeople who still hold that plays should\nnot be published, but should be kept\nstrictly from the public except through\nthe medium of the stage, I must say\nthat for my part I am grateful to re-\nceive these things and thus be enabled\nto enjoy them in my walks and my\ntrain and my automobile.\nAnd I should imagine that these\nparticular four plays by Mr. Hughes\nwould be of considerable value to any\ntheatre the repertory system had not\nutterly baffled. As it is, the repertory\nsystem acts as a spook to us or seems to\nbe too stupid a thing and too ordinary\nfor any English theatre manager to\ncomprehend.\nWell, it is of no use wasting more\ntime in talking about that: it's all been\ntalked in and out of existence;—let it\ngo then, and let us read these excel-\nlent plays without further regrets.\nThe newer school of English play-\nwrights, to which Mr. Hughes belongs,\nis on the right road. It is concerned\nwith plays which are plays, not plays\nwhich are Sermons or Debates or\nDrugs or Propaganda. Questions seem\nno longer to teaze the younger drama-\ntists. What a blessing. We really\nare getting on at last. Woman takes\nher place in these new dramas instead\nof being put up in a pillory for the\nDramatist to throw oranges at her or\nto flatter her \" good-fellow \"-ship.\nYes, indeed we are getting on. Or\nrather, Mr. Hughes and the others are\ngetting us on, so good luck to them\none and all.\n\nAN ITALIAN DICTIONARY\nby Alfred Hoare. Second Edition.\nCambridge University Press. 42f net.\nC.1 ■\" * tUTux l*n 1 VfiMIU IHIIIWIIII ■ 111 I\nTHIS admirable Dictionary, the most\ncomplete and helpful we have\never used, should be in every public\nand university and school library, and\nclose to the hand of every student\nwhose work brings him into any rela-\ntion whatever with Italian matters and\nItalian literature.\nMr Hoare has based his work on\nthe best authorities; he has arranged it\non a lucid and most helpful plan: in\nits comprehensiveness, its completeness,\nits wealth of illustrative quotations and\nof special phrases and proverbs,- and\nits inclusion of both old technical words\nand modern terms and phrases which\nwe have found in no other Italian-\nEnglish Vocabulary, we consider it far\nsuperior to any other existing in En-\nglish. The Cambridge University Press\nhas issued it in a convenient volume,\nadmirably arranged, and printed in fine\nclear type, and, together with Mr Hoare,\nrendered a valuable service to every\nEnglish student of the Italian language\nby the publication of this work.\n\nTHE BULLETINS The Smith-\nsonian Institute.\n■■ ■■■—■■■■\"\" ■ I m i ■mi. — I i\nONLY two words are needed to\ntell of the valuable Bulletins is-\nsued by the Smithsonian Institute, Wash-*\nington, and everyone who knows but\none of them will want to see the\nothers.\nThese Bulletins, together with the\nGeographical Magazine, form the most\nserious and the most brilliant publica-\ntion which America issues,\nThey contain little of Theatric in-\nterest and you have to search carefully *\nto find even that little: but the search\nis worth while."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c139", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c139", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "185", "page_fin": "186", "image_debut": 101, "image_fin": 102, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.29.2", "titre_corps": "THE DANCE by Cecil Sharpe &", "titre_sommaire": "THE DANCE by Cecil Sharpe &", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 101, "page_imprimee": "185", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.101", "debut_caractere": 15, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6865, "texte": "THE DANCE by Cecil Sharpe &\nA. P. Oppe. Halton & Truscott\nSmith, Ltd. London 1924. 30/- net\nTHIS is a very delightful book which\nI, for one, would have printed on\nvery much thinner paper. There is no\nother fault (if this be a fault) that I can\nfind with the work of the publishers,\nwhich is done in a lavish manner, and\nwith taste.\nWhat is said in the book is exactly\nwhat was necessary to say, namely,\nthat we have in England \" sufficient\nmaterial from which to develop a spec-\ntacular dance for the theatre which\nshall consist of movements at once na-\ntural and expressive, and possessing the\nadvantage for England that they are\ncast in the dance idiom of our own\ncountry. \" All critics having any doubts\ncould not do better than copy this\nstatement and embellish it ten or\ntwelve times in the course of each year.\nForeign dances really do deserve a rest.\nIt really is time, I think, for an En-\nglish ballet. I should hate to become\nsceptical, but I am sceptical for this\nmoment. I am sceptical when I see\na thing called the English International\nOpera Company holding itself up on\nforeign operas. It is quite absurd to\ncall something which is not English, En-\nglish. Call it what you will but do\nnot call it English- There are heaps\nof other good names. And I dread lest\nan English ballet should be grown from\nRussian seed. It would be excessively\nstupid.\nCecil Sharpe, the author of this book,\ndevoted long years of his life, with\nvery little help from others, to searching\nfor an English folk dance tradition, for\nhe felt that, if he once found it and\ncould give it shape, an English ballet\nwould in time come into being.\nI haye often imagined an English\nballet, and I have a little imagination\nand can sometimes spend half an hour\nwatching the ballets which I myself\ncreate. Do not suppose me to be one\nof those superior beings who believe\nthat all is created solely through the\nimagination. Before all, perhaps, there\nis the dancer, and I should be sorry\nfor the public to be obliged to rely on\nme to cut the capers; but I can see\nthese ballets — these English ballets.\n< I see the curtain rising, I know the\ncolour. It is not the colour of the\nRussian ballet, nor that of the French;\nit is the English colour right enough.\nI see the first movement: that is En-\nglish, too. It is quite unlike anything\nthe great Diaghilev brought to England\nfrom Russia. It is rather more easy ;\nit is about six times as healthy. There\nwas always something just a trifle sick\nabout the Russians : a certain sickness\nsoused in perfumery. Of its kind it is\nwithout question the very last word,\nbut the kind has nothing whatever to\ndo with the English ballet which, as\nyou are doubtless aware, must have a\nmelancholy all it own and a merryness\nnot necessarily noisy.\nAnd I am told that Mr. Cochran\nhas started an English ballet. Well,\nwith all due respect to Mr. Cochran,\nI very much have my doubts. Mr.\nCochran, whom I have always thought\nowed much to influence of Mr. Duveen,\nis one of the most able men in the\ndramatic world to start a limited lia-\nbility company, but an English ballet\nis not in his line. Mr. Cochran is an\nimpresario : nothing certainly less — and\nnot more. It was Mr. Cecil Sharpe who\nwas the founder of the English ballet.\nNot that his rescuscitation of the Morris\ndance means very much. It would be\na mistake to take the English Morris\ndance as revived by Mr. Sharpe too\nseriously, but there are things in it which\ncan never be taken seriously enough.\nIn a little booklet by Ralph Gardiner,\ncalled \" The English Folk Dance Tra-\ndition \", the author says that one of\nthe great projects of the English Folk\nDance Society is the creation of an\nEnglish ballet comparable to those of\nRussia and Sweden. I do not like\nthat word u project \". Neither do I\nlike the suggestion that a dance society\nis to be left to the creating of this\nlong-waited-for ballet. I would ra-\nther Mr. Gardiner created it himself;\nor, if Mr. Gardiner is not a great dan-\ncer, that he should create it together\nwith one great dancer, preferably a\nman. Now and again societies give\nus original performers but not habitually.\nThe greatest French actor of the eigh-\nteenth century, Le Kain, came from a\nprivate society theatre, but somehow I\nlook for a great dancer to appear any\nday from the ranks of a pantomine\nchorus in Huddersfield, or Nottingham,\nor Bradford. Such a man would not\nbe in love with the Russian ballet. If\nanything he would rather fear it and\nbe silent where Chelsea gushes. And\nto such a man this book by Sharpe\nwould mean very little ; and the truth\nis that all this book can do is to keep\nin front of our eyes the fact that there\nis such a thing as the dance, and that\nit was very wonderful in France, and\nwas courageous in Italy, and charming\nin Vienna. Such a book can keep\nus all talking at the dinner table. It\nis like a little illustrated programme of\nan evening's entertainment which has\nlasted nineteen centuries, gone by in a\nflash like a bicycle goes by the win-\ndow, in a flash. The nineteen centuries\nof Dance and Ballet have gone by in\nthat flash, leaving England nothing\nbehind.\nI believe that there is really some-\nthing true in the fact that one must\nbe quick to catch a thing as it is going\nby; something true in it. Of course\nif you have a policeman at the\nend of the street and you give him\nhis orders he will stop the bicycle, but\nwhat worries me is that he might not\nbe able to arrest the intelligence of a\ncouple of centuries.... still one never\nknows.\nThis book by Sharpe and Opp&\ncontains a great deal of history. A\nnumber of dates, allied with a number\nof names, and illustrated by a number\nof superb reproductions; for there are\nseventy-five plates, and seven illustra-\ntions in the text, and the four colou-\nred plates engraved and printed by\nReiach are really charming; and these\nthings all help to make it very well\nworth its price, and I bless the au-\nthors for giving us a good index.\nHas the book sold well? I hear\nso often of books that do not sell well,\nand that always makes me worry about\npaper and the binding of books; and,\nas I said at the beginning I thought\nthat this paper was rather too heavy,\ntoo rich, I must now point to an extra\nfault; I think the binding is too ex-\npensive. If paper and binding had\nbeen less, could not the book have\ncome out at half the price —at 15/ -\nSuch a price is more within the reach\nof another four or five hundred people.\nAnd, still thinking about paper and the\nbinding of books, 1 wonder if it would\nnot be possible to bring the book\nout for 5/ -, giving a little less pe -\nhaps, and certainly eliminating more an 1\nmore of the swank. It's swank tha:\ncosts such a lot nowadays. Can't gc\nto a theatre ! Why not ? Plush seats,\nBristol board programmes, one shilling.\nAxminster carpets on staircase. Two\nhundred extra lamps for the auditorium.\nCostumes for the people who show"}, {"page_pdf": 102, "page_imprimee": "186", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.102", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1404, "texte": "you into your seat. Evening dress for\nthe manager; motor car to and from\nthe place. Hoity, toity. What is the\nmeaning of all this swank ? It is not\nworth anything, and yet millions of\npounds are wasted on it. You tell me\nthat nobody would visit the not-Swanky\ntheatre, that nobody would buy swank-\nless books. I would not like you to\nconsider me at all rude, but if you are\na good friend of mine I tell you that\nyou are deluded. If you had twoo or\nthree days to spare (and if I had) I\nwould go through all the details of the\nproduction of books and the manage-\nment of theatres, and I would show\nyou step by step where all this swank\nwas unnecessary and how it totted up\nto the waste of many millions of\npounds.\nI only regret the swellness of this\nparticular book because it is a book I\nshould like to see many thousand peo-\nple possessing. The same publishers\nissue another book on 44 Old French\nline Engravings\", this they limit to\n1250 copies, and issue at three gui-\nneas and seven guineas, which seems\nto me a very proper thing to do, be-\ncause old French line engravings are\nthings which very few cultured people\nlove to ponder over; and their book\nof 44 Old French Colour Prints *\\ by\nCampbell Dodgson, also limited, is quite\nreasonable at three guineas ; but 44 The\nDance which is a popular thing, be-\nlongs to the public, and the public\nshould be able to buy all its popular\nthings very cheaply."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c140", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c140", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "186", "page_fin": "186", "image_debut": 102, "image_fin": 102, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.29.3", "titre_corps": "FUCINI. NOVELLE E POESIE", "titre_sommaire": "FUCINI. NOVELLE E POESIE", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 102, "page_imprimee": "186", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.102", "debut_caractere": 1406, "fin_caractere_exclue": 3988, "texte": "FUCINI. NOVELLE E POESIE,\nEdited by Henry Furst D. Litt. : Uni-\nversity of Chicago Italian series.\nTHE little books of this series are\nedited by Mr Ernest Hatch Wil-\nkins. And it is, to judge from this\nvolume, a really delightful series.\nScholarly, not too bulky, pleasant good\npaper, solidly bound, copious notes,\nand Dr Furst's notes are clear, brief\nand entertaining: it is just what is\nwanted.\nFucini was born in 1843. 44 No\nwriter \" says Dr Furst, 44 excelled\nhim in simplicity and purity of style,\nin serenity of outlook, humour and\ngenuine feeling He wrote in the\nPisan dialect. 44 He taught belle let-\ntere (or, as he said, cartoline postali)\nat a boyfs school in Pistoia \". Then\nhe became an inspector of schools,\n14 an occupation for which his nature\nwas perfectly adapted \". He died in\n192L\nMatthew Arnold was older by\nr twenty years but they were contem-\ni poraries. I should like to read an\n5 imaginary conversation between these\nt two who were both poets and both\nE inspectors of schools.\n5 Dr Furst gives us three out of the\nr hundred sonnets of Fucini and ten of\n• the tales and a selection from Fucini's\n► impressions of Napoli. Ever since the\n: sonnets appeared in 1872 they must\n: have proved a source of inspiration to\n' hundreds of comedians; Musco, Fer-\nravilla, Petrolini, who have assuredly\n■ held the book in their hands as so\nmuch treasure; and it is only when\nsuch comedians read such verses aloud\nthat we, the poor public, ever get the\nfull value of them.\nFor there is something loud in\nthem : and the loud has more in it\nthan the timid suspect, for to the timid\nthere is mostly rudeness ia the loud.\nFor my part I want to hear more\nsonnets, verses, tales of genius spoken\naloud, but not by the poets : by the\nactors and to people who delight to\nlisten as the Italians do. I cannot\nabide to be listening with folk who\nare waiting for something pathetic,\nsententious, witty or biting. The loud\nis anyhow a guarantee that we are to\nbe spared these things : I feel safe with\nthe loud the moment it strikes up. It\nis after all only the old elephant of\nthe jungle : but the pathetic, the sen-\ntentious and the witty, as they start,\nremind me too immediately of the\ncrocodile, the lion and the tiger cat.\nI have never loved the lion to the\nextent that tradition does. He is\nsupposed to be so bold, so direct,\nwhereas he approaches his prey in a\ntortuous way. Ferravilla would be\nalways likening people to animals, I am\ntold. 44 Look —a horse \" he would say,\nor 44 a grey cat Many an actor has\nthis instinct and looks quickly for the\nanimal each man stands for."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c141", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c141", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "186", "page_fin": "186", "image_debut": 102, "image_fin": 102, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.29.4", "titre_corps": "THE CALL OF THE NIRVANA", "titre_sommaire": "THE CALL OF THE NIRVANA", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 102, "page_imprimee": "186", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.102", "debut_caractere": 3990, "fin_caractere_exclue": 5911, "texte": "THE CALL OF THE NIRVANA,\nDrama in Five Acts by Rudolf Broda,\nEnglish version with the collaboration\nof Selma B. Stone. The Four Seas\nCo. Boston.\nTHIS publishing house in its announce-\nments, prospectuses and wrappers\ntells the public that this series of books,\nie The Contemporary Series, are books\nof belles-lettres,—poetry, plays, essays,\nissued in an attractive format and\navailable at a popular price. But when\nI search to discern how popular is this\nprice nothing informs me.\nI am however rewarded, for I find\nsomething else, which is, that these\n• books include a playlet by Benavente,\ni one by Gordon Bottomley and one by\nf Von Hofmannsthal.\ni M The Call of the Nirvana \" is\nrather more than a bit dull: it is the\n! copyright of Ernst Bircher, Verlag\nAktiengesellchaft in Berne. It reads\nbadly. It might, who knows, act well\nand it might not. I can conceive no-\nthing more undramatic, but then I can\nconceive nothing less attractive than\nthe 44 heavy antique wove paper the\n44 coloured wrappers 99 and the 44 spe-\ncial designs\" which are all made a\ngreat point of in the announcements.\nIn 1923 the same firm issued 4< The\nArt of Cineplastics \" by Elie Faure\ntranslated from the French by Walter\nPach, Price I/—. (They announced\nprices in those days). A rare 1000\ncopies were issued — 44 1000 copies\nonly '* — and 25 on Stratford Paper\nwhatever that may be. M. Faure says\nin this booklet that Chaplin (re Charlie)\nmakes him think of Shakespeare.... he\nhas the same bewildering and yet lucid\nlyricism that Shakespeare had 41 Lucid\nLyricism *#! and there is something in\nMr Walter Pach that reminds me of\nShakespeare,—the silver sound, I think,\n44 and music with its silver sound \".\nBut the golden silence of Chaplin,\nhow that can be compared with Shakes-\npeare who is all words puzzles me.\nCompare Charlie with an actor and\nI'm with you, Elie. Compare him\nwith Ferravilla.... but where has Charlie\nsuddenly gone to ?"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c142", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c142", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "186", "page_fin": "187", "image_debut": 102, "image_fin": 103, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.29.5", "titre_corps": "AROUND THEATRES by Max", "titre_sommaire": "AROUND THEATRES by Max", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 102, "page_imprimee": "186", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.102", "debut_caractere": 5913, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6743, "texte": "AROUND THEATRES by Max\nBeerbohm. Heinemann.\nAvery remarkable book of Dra-\nmatic Criticisms appeared in Lon-\ndon in the year 1924 and no one\nnoted it. It was called 44 Around\nTheatres *\\ was in two volumes, and\nis by Mr. Max Beerbohm.—Well, I\nalmost wonder if I need go on.\nIs it necessary today to explain why\nany book by Mr Beerbohm must be\nthe best book of the year. Have we\nforgotten that there is an art of wri-\nting ?\nAs a rule we cannot write and I\nam almost convinced that the thing we\ncall thinking is not exactly thinking.\nBut Mr. Bernard Shaw, Sir A. W.\nPinero, Mr Rudyard Kipling, and a\ndozen more \" great writers\" and\n44 thinkers '* are, I believe, convinced\nthat they can both write and think:\nand, being so convinced, they set to\nwith a will, and, thinking it all out,\nthey then write it all down. As Iam\ndoing here."}, {"page_pdf": 103, "page_imprimee": "187", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.103", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4642, "texte": "But what troubles me is that I know\n1 am doing it badly. No such doubt\n'roubles them—as she said \" no bloom-\nng fear\nWhat I want to be saying in two\nwords, and take a hundred and miss\ndoing it, is that I think Beerbohm is\none of the best brains and one of the\nfew perfect writers we have had, and\nI cannot say it. To plump it out would\nbe of no good. Even a drama must\nhave a beginning, a middle and an\nend.\nAnd I am so impatient; I want the\naudience to come in with me to all\nour Theatres—to this one here—to sit\ndown—hold up their hands to a cur-\ntain on which are flashed the words\n\" All's understood \" and go out again\nand enjoy themselves there. As I am\ndoing here.\nBut Mr Shaw, Sir A. W. Pinero\nand the others don't want that at all.\nGood gracious no. They want nothing\nto be understood until they have for-\nced us all to come to heel —to enter\na parody of the real playhouse, to sit\nthere three hours and go out more\nconfused than before. Then and then\nonly may we go home and take twenty-\nfive years waiting for the light to\ndawn.... and slowly, slowly get the\nglimmering that we—just—have—wa-\nsted— twenty-five — years listening to\nmodern dramatists talking about prac-\ntically nothing at all.\nSome of us arrive at this by a sort\nof short cut to happiness and avoid\ngoing to listen to modern dramatists\ntalking. I am one of these. Some\ntwenty-six years ago I heard a play\nby Mr Pinero and three years later\none by Mr Shaw, and I never want\nto hear another. Some thirty years\n♦ago 1 read a page by Mr. Max Beer-\nfbohm and I never intend to miss ano-\nther.\nExplain why it is that these bore\nus and the other enchants. Or ra-\nther let me do so in two lines. It\nis because Mr Beerbohm is a born\nartist and Mr. Shaw and Sir A. W.\nPinero and many of the other admira-\nble gentlemen in the Dramatic field\nnever were and so never can be\nanything in any way whatever ap-\nproaching to the condition of artists.\nAnd so while Mr Shaw for three\nyears wrote a dramatic criticism each\nweek in the \" Saturday Review \", re-\ntiring from the post to give place to\nBeerbohm who for twelve years wrote\na dramatic criticism each week for the\nsame \" Saturday Review \", the Shaw\nessays count as nothing and the Beer-\nbohm essays are well-nigh perfect.\nShaw, who looks like Hercules,\ngives in after three years of it; Beer-\nbohm, who looks like anything but\nHercules, beats him by enduring nine\nyears longer than the giant was able\nto ....this is of course a point everyone\nwill have noted.\nI regret that these two new volumes\nare two out of a rare set of nine, for\nthose who should know of these Dra-\nmatic Criticisms will not come to know\nof them until Messrs Heinemann is-\nsue a popular edition ; and let us hope\nthis will appear during 1926. I do\nhope this with all my heart.\nI had intended to lift tempting pas-\nsages from these essays but I will not:\nyou must somehow get hold of a copy\nand read all the essays. There is one\non Henry Irving which you will read\nseveral times. I advise you to read it\nafter you have read Mr Shaw's article\non \" Mr Irving takes paregoric \" dated\nMay 4th 1895. In that article Mr\nShaw is constrained to state, of the\nStory of Waterloo, that \" there is\nabsolutely no acting in it—none what-\never \" ; he asserts, too, that a call-boy\ncould have performed a certain passage\nin that play. In fact Mr Shaw, besides\nbeing no artist, is woefully ignorant of\nacting ; yet he assumes, when he writes,\nall the assurance of one who knows\nall about it.\nMr Beerbohm, on the other hand,\nis a born actor, and, so far as I know,\nmakes no pretention at all to being\nthat. Every fine artist has a bit of\ngenius for acting. Giotto and Cellini,\nFragonard, Mozart, all of 'em had it ;\nand poor Shaw is totally without that\nbit of genius.... for the reason above\nstated.\nI delight to see, in this the stupid\nage, our G. B. S. raised up to be a\ncentral figure.\nIf it were not a stupid age, Beer-\nbohm would in all probability have\nwrit us our plays ;... they would have\nbeen powerful humorous things.... no-\nthing would have been amiss. Instead\nof this we have his Dramatic Criticisms\n—two books just as wise as they are\nunaffected, as useful to the stage as they\nare useful to the student of the En-\nglish language. The student of English\nhas profitted ; the theatre, as represented\nby those who elbow their way in\nand out of its stagedoor, has not\nprofitted.\nBut those of us who do care very\nmuch that the playhouse shall recover\nitself, as assuredly it shall, offer to\nMr. Beerbohm our admiration and our\nthanks for the lessons he gave us every\nSaturday for twelve years and which\nsome day we hope to show him we\nhave more or less understood."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c143", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c143", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "187", "page_fin": "188", "image_debut": 103, "image_fin": 104, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.29.6", "titre_corps": "RING MASTERS", "titre_sommaire": "RING MASTERS", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 103, "page_imprimee": "187", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.103", "debut_caractere": 4644, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6671, "texte": "RING MASTERS.\nRICHARD WAGNER\n& JAMES .\nMy Circus Life by James Lloyd with\na preface by G. K. Chesterton,\nNoel Douglas. Price 5j*\nWagner's Music Drama of the Ring\nby L. Archier Leroy ; engravings by\nPaul Nash. (Noel Douglas) Price / 2 j-6*\nNOEL Douglas of 38 Great Ormond\nStreet, London is a new-comer in\nthe Publishers' Ring. He enters the magic\ncircle with a crack of the whip. And\nout trot some of the prettiest little po-\nnies ever I did see, in the shape of\nbooks as buxom as good work and\nmaterials and watchful eyes can make\nthem.\nWhen we see good craftsmanship in\nthe publishing or theatrical line or, for\nthat matter, in the way of restaurants,\nHotels, or Governments, our minds\noften turn to thinking of the unseen\nworkmen who can make or mar all\ncooperative work.\nIs it not some sort of toast to absent\nguests some of us offer silently to the\ngood workmen on seeing their work :\n— are the curses not loud but deep to\nthe bad workmen.\nAnd of course the good ones know\nof this—feel it in their bones—be they\nhidden by a big curtain or thick walls,\nby black ink or red tape. The bad\nworkmen never know what they get\nfrom us or what they misss That's\nwhat renders them surly and makes\nthem strike.\nAnd the good hidden workman, on\nhearing the rounds of applause, looks\nat the ring-master as he strides out to\nacknowledge with a bow the approval\nof the public for the work of himself\nand his men.\nOn the return of the ring-master\ndoes he go round to all and sundry\nand say \" It was you, old chap, who\nmade the show ;—the applause is yours,\nnot mine\nRing-masters may once in a blue\nmoon realize when some one member\nof a company has actually done the\nwork of forty—but he has to be very\nill first, ...laid up, unable to be on\nthe spot.\nThe ringmasters, for all the applause\nthey endure, are to be respected.\nWhen I first saw Barnum's Big Circus\nthere were three rings. In each a\nring-master. And here we have three\nof them too. Douglas, Wagner and\nLloyd.\nDouglas is dressy, Wagner classic,\nand Lloyd knows his business. Bar-"}, {"page_pdf": 104, "page_imprimee": "188", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.104", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 3319, "texte": "num, the Deity of Showmen, presides\nover the whole business.\nThe cover of the Wagner book has\nmade itself up like the face of a clown\n—Grock couldn't have done it better ;\nthat of the Lloyd book is like the\ngreen satin trousers of Fratellini. And\nthe insides of both books bubble with\nfun. Even as all clowns get their laughs\nthrough being deadly in earnest, so do\nsome of the better kind of Ring-masters.\nAnd Wagner gets his that way.\nNot for Wagner is there any value\nin that vulgar saying about laughing\nlast. He never laughs, just as the classic\nold ring-master of 1870 never laughed.\nHe lets others do this and he lets others\ntalk and sing and run about. Wagner\n• has let Mr. Leroy his devoted admirer\ntalk, and for 196 pages Mr. Leroy\ntalks Wagner at us. He and Mr. Barbor\ncrack some jokes at his expense and the\nhorses trot round ; there's the circus.\nImmense as ever, Richard Wagner\ntowers in the centre.\nIt is a circus I never go to.\nOn the other hand nothing could\nkeep me out of Mr. James Lloyd's\ncircus.\nHis kind is the genuine article. The\njoke L. A. Leroy makes with H. R.\nBarbor about Wagner being a Man of\nthe theatre hits no one but the giant\nhimself. Lloyd is here to prove it a\njoke and a rather unkind one.\nOnly men like Lloyd are men of the\ntheatre. Festespiels by the hundred,\nBeechams by the score, Dalcroze's by\nthe million, will never be true theatre.\nA passage in Mr. Leroy's introduction\nstrikes me as curiously blind. He writes;\n\" When this (some trifle cr other) has\nbeen accomplished we may look for-\nward to a production of \" Tristan \",\nperhaps, which does not in any way\nremind us of an evening at Lord George\nSanger's estimable show \".\nHe fails to see, with most Wagne-\nrians, that what Wagner lacked was\nSanger's genius.... the genius of the\ngenuine Showman, and that his sole\nchance ofj being taken as a serious\ntheatre man lay in a forlorn hope that\nsome day he might remind us of Lord\nGeorge Sanger.\nI could understand a Wagner who\nbegan the way he did; who went :\nthrough it all and came out cured, and\nthen began his work. But to go on\nand in still further, to grow more and '\nmore Wagnerian when he should have 1\ngrown more and more Sangerian, that's <\nthe trouble.\nThese two books are made to live I\nside by side. Mr Lloyd's faults are t\nall the showman's—in a book he has -\n41 been and gone anJ done it\" as\nMr. Chesterton says in a charming\nIntroduction.\nAnd inasmuch as he has been a\nshowman and gone off afterwards and\ndone a book to say what exactly is\nthe whole life of a showman—a man\nof the theatre — by so much has he\nblazed light on the rare old smoke\nwhich Mr. Leroy and some three hun-\ndred other very clever men produce from\ntheir bonfires as they go round and\nround and round them throwing in this\nand that fillet, root and entrail, so as\nto make the charm work, and ultimately,\nwe hope, \" to share i* the gains *\\\n\" Up from the clown \" is the motto\nof the men of the theatre, not down\nfrom the Gods How long will it\ntake humanity (and one may add the\ncritic) to see this ?\nIs it not the cry \" up from the\nape \" that gives man at last a hope ?\nIf it is \" down from the Gods \" then\nall hope has gone. And if Wagner\nbe one of the Giants—if his spirit has\nreached so high as Bach, Beethoven and\nMozart, what the deuce are his gnomes\ndoing numbling round our cauldron ?"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c144", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c144", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "188", "page_fin": "188", "image_debut": 104, "image_fin": 104, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.29.7", "titre_corps": "JACOPONE DA TODI, POET", "titre_sommaire": "JACOPONE DA TODI, POET", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 104, "page_imprimee": "188", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.104", "debut_caractere": 3321, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6883, "texte": "JACOPONE DA TODI, POET\nAND MYSTIC. 1228*1306; by\nEvelyn Underbill. Dent Sons.\n16/— net.\nIF ever an intemperate man walked\nthis earth it was Jacopone da Todi\n—but there have been few whose in-\ntemperance took them off the earth as\ndid his. He soared with intempe-\nrance ; a lack of cardinal virtue laun-\nched him into Heaven. He loved so\nmuch that he loved all but himself.\nA writer in \" The Mask \" (J) recently\ntold us something of his story but I\nthink it very unlikely that its readers\nwill ever hear it retold correctly. Even\npagans nowadays are such scandal-\nmongers, such back-biters; and Jaco-\npone was that unforgivable thing, a true\nChristian. Mad, but Christlike in parts.\nIn some ways he resembles that\nfigure created by Walter Pater, Den-\nnys d*Auxerois. But Dennys was far\nmadder for he seems to have had two\nmasters—Jacopone had but one. Po-\nsitively he believed in love and not in\nFamour. (\nAnd this is one of the best books j\nwe have about him in our English (\nlanguage. It also contains thirty* four <\nof his songs in Italian and in English, j\nThe publishers announce only thirty- |\nthree but I counted twice and counted ,\nthirty-four. (\n_ s\nI regret that the talented authoress\nforgot to include J. A. Symonds' work\nin her \" Bibliography \" : and, while I\nam captious, let me indulge a regret\nthat so many publishers use quite such\nthick paper.\nI don't like rough blotting like pa-\nper to touch, and I don't think any\nlover of books likes it. Neither do 1\nlike the top edge of a fine book to be\npainted. If gilt, well and good; or if\nyeliowed, very carefully, it passes. But\nall depends on how these difficult jobs\nare done. Still the great firm of Dent\nis not alone in occasionally doing a\nlittle clumsy work. It is more or less\nthe fashion today. Not half enough\nconsideration is paid to those ancient\nproblems which beset even the devoted\n, lovers of good covers, paper, type, set-\nting and covers. *\nI have noticed that the Cambridge\nPress has a delicate taste in such mat-\nters. Chatto & Windus too. I often\nlike the books Jonathan Cape sends out.\nThe work of Mr Heinemann used to\nbe refined and some of it is so still.\nAll the good publishers try to pro-\nduce fine work of course ; but nowa-\ndays the right kind of brain and eye\nseems too often not to be employed by\nthese publishers.\nWe all know (or suppose) that good\ncardboard, cloth, paper and the like\nare hard to get and that all these\nthings are rather more expensive; but it&\nbrains I'm talking about, the special brain\nwhich understands what are* the quali-\nties needed in book work and how to\nhandle the book-binders and printers.\nThe Curwen Press has some real ta~\nlent, and so I take it that the Press\nhas men of brains and taste in control..\nLet printers experiment more with\nnewer papers, newer shapes, colours z\nand by new I mean those papers and\ncolours which are in front of their\nnoses and so near and so cheap that\nthey fail for this reason to be aware-\nof them.\nAnd why put on such heavy and\ncostly covers ? why such armour-clad\naffairs ? why not aim for delicacy and\ngood sense.\nThis is just what I feel Jacopone\nwould have said had he ever known\nof any but the most superb and yet\nthe cheapest binding, printing and\npaper. Experiment, for heaven's sake,,\ndear publishers. Put aside a small'\nsum of money a year to be used solely\nfor making experiments ; make them un-\nbeknown to us and on no account risk\nan experiment in public. Experiment is\nonly for the laboratory, and, if done\nseriously, would cost you only a few\nhundreds a year.\n(i) Vol. X. No. 2. April 1924. f"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c145", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c145", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "189", "page_fin": "189", "image_debut": 105, "image_fin": 105, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.29.8", "titre_corps": "THE GREATER LAW by", "titre_sommaire": "THE GREATER LAW by", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 105, "page_imprimee": "189", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.105", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 825, "texte": "THE GREATER LAW by Leo-\nnard C. White• Stage Play Publi-\nshing Bureau. London. //-: cloth\nbound, J?/-.\nI have read many a worse play, and\nsome merrier comedies,... for this is\ncalled \" a comedy in one act But\nI have some how never felt myself\nkept waiting quite as long for the point\nto be made ; and I fear I must call\nit a fault in this author to have kept\nthe audience in ignorance of where he\nwas going and what he was going to do.\nFor £ 1. 1. 0 amateurs may re-\npresent this piece, and I think they\nwill find their work none too easy.\nTo the lines in the stage direction\non page I Trevelyan crosses with the\ncups of tea I would here add and\nfalling over the sofa with them, en-\ntirely disappears. I feel it would be ef-\nfective, anyhow, and would risk it for\nthe sake of the audience who I believe\nwould never forget it."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c146", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c146", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "189", "page_fin": "189", "image_debut": 105, "image_fin": 105, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.29.9", "titre_corps": "THE ANGEL OF THE", "titre_sommaire": "THE ANGEL OF THE", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 105, "page_imprimee": "189", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.105", "debut_caractere": 827, "fin_caractere_exclue": 3188, "texte": "THE ANGEL OF THE\nCHIMES by Fortune du Boisgoby.\nTHE CONVICT COLONEL: by\nFortune du Boisgoby.\nTHE NEAPOLITAN LOVERS by\nAlexandre Dumas. Stanley Paul &.\nCo. London. Translated by R. S.\nGarnett. Price 2/6 net each.\nFIRST the great old man.\nDumas was fifty-seven years old\nwhen he wrote this hook and there\nare some chapters as good as anything\nin \" Monte Cristo \" or t\\>e other mas-\nter pieces.\nHe was in Napoli, installed in the\nChiatamone Palace by Garibaldi, and\nthere he brought to life Ferdinando,\nKing of the two Sicilies and Jerusa-\nlem, Infante of Spain, Duke of Parma,\nof Piacenza, of Castro, and hereditary\nGrand Prince of Tuscany, that prepo-\nsterous but sensible Italian whom the\nlazzaroni of Napoli called \" II Re Na-\nsone \" King big Nose #\\\nThe genius with which Dumas brings\nhim to life is one of the things we\nshall never cease to marvel at : — how\ndoes he do it ? how can this being be\nmade to move, to walk right out into\nour room, and exist for us as he exi-\nsted in realty. For he is real and not\nmade up. He is preposterous ; yet he\nis likable, and admirable. He has most\nof the faults of a poor king and the\nqualities of a perfect one — He is, in\nfact, a king.\nMost novelists give us less than a\npoor actor does when playing the part.\nAll else in the book, good as it is,\nfades by the side this brilliant creation.\nThere slops Emma Hamilton, and\nthere stalks Nelson : Lord Acton looks\npoisonous and Queen Caroline daggers.\nThese are not fortunate enough to be\nmore than sketches ; yet put any one of\nthem into either of the two works by\ndu Boisgoby and our attention would\nbe rivetted on these figures and we\nshould take them to be alive. It is\nbecause Ferdinand is a round little\nmasterpiece that the others become flat.\nDu Boisgoby does not create any\nfigure at all worth while in his my-\nstery tales, but he is readable. Not\nso readable as Bennett with his \" Grand\nBabylon Hotel \", or Chesterton with\nhis \" Man who was Thursday \". What\nfirst class entertainers are these two\nthrillers! As good as either, to my\nthinking, is A. E. W. Mason's \" The\nHouse of the Arrow Mason doesn't\ndisappoint; \" The Winding Stair \"....\n\"The Villa Rose \"....Yes. I like Mason.\nBut I am forgetting that it is du\nBoisgoby I am supposed to say I like;\nand, if you don't give me Mason, Ches-\nterton, or. the author of \" The Cap-\ntive of Love du Boisgoby will do."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c147", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c147", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "189", "page_fin": "189", "image_debut": 105, "image_fin": 105, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.29.10", "titre_corps": "THE SISTERS' TRAGEDY", "titre_sommaire": "THE SISTERS' TRAGEDY", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 105, "page_imprimee": "189", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.105", "debut_caractere": 3190, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4727, "texte": "THE SISTERS' TRAGEDY\nand Three other Plays hy Richard\nHugh es. Heinemann Ltd. 6/- net,\n£- '\nALTHOUGH there are many lite-\nrary men, critics and theatrical\npeople who still hold that plays should\nnot be published, but should be kept\nstrictly from the public except through\nthe medium of the stage, I must say\nthat for my part I am grateful to re-\nceive these things and thus be enabled\nto enjoy them in my walks and my\ntrain and my automobile.\nAnd I should imagine that these\nparticular four plays by Mr. Hughes\nwould be of considerable value to any\ntheatre the repertory system had not\nutterly baffled. As it is, the repertory\nsystem acts as a spook to us or seems to\nbe too stupid a thing and too ordinary\nfor any English theatre manager to\ncomprehend.\nWell, it is of no use wasting more\ntime in talking about that: it's all been\ntalked in and out of existence;—let it\ngo then, and let us read these excel-\nlent plays without further regrets.\nThe newer school of English play-\nwrights, to which Mr. Hughes belongs,\nis on the right road. It is concerned\nwith plays which are plays, not plays\nwhich are Sermons or Debates or\nDrugs or Propaganda. Questions seem\nno longer to teaze the younger drama-\ntists. What a blessing. We really\nare getting on at last. Woman takes\nher place in these new dramas instead\nof being put up in a pillory for the\nDramatist to throw oranges at her or\nto flatter her \" good-fellow \"-ship.\nYes, indeed we are getting on. Or\nrather, Mr. Hughes and the others are\ngetting us on, so good luck to them\none and all."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c148", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c148", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "189", "page_fin": "189", "image_debut": 105, "image_fin": 105, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.29.11", "titre_corps": "AN ITALIAN DICTIONARY", "titre_sommaire": "AN ITALIAN DICTIONARY", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 105, "page_imprimee": "189", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.105", "debut_caractere": 4729, "fin_caractere_exclue": 5825, "texte": "AN ITALIAN DICTIONARY\nby Alfred Hoare. Second Edition.\nCambridge University Press. 42f net.\nC.1 ■\" * tUTux l*n 1 VfiMIU IHIIIWIIII ■ 111 I\nTHIS admirable Dictionary, the most\ncomplete and helpful we have\never used, should be in every public\nand university and school library, and\nclose to the hand of every student\nwhose work brings him into any rela-\ntion whatever with Italian matters and\nItalian literature.\nMr Hoare has based his work on\nthe best authorities; he has arranged it\non a lucid and most helpful plan: in\nits comprehensiveness, its completeness,\nits wealth of illustrative quotations and\nof special phrases and proverbs,- and\nits inclusion of both old technical words\nand modern terms and phrases which\nwe have found in no other Italian-\nEnglish Vocabulary, we consider it far\nsuperior to any other existing in En-\nglish. The Cambridge University Press\nhas issued it in a convenient volume,\nadmirably arranged, and printed in fine\nclear type, and, together with Mr Hoare,\nrendered a valuable service to every\nEnglish student of the Italian language\nby the publication of this work."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c149", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c149", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "189", "page_fin": "189", "image_debut": 105, "image_fin": 105, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.29.12", "titre_corps": "THE BULLETINS The", "titre_sommaire": "THE BULLETINS The", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 105, "page_imprimee": "189", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.105", "debut_caractere": 5827, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6358, "texte": "THE BULLETINS The Smith-\nsonian Institute.\n■■ ■■■—■■■■\"\" ■ I m i ■mi. — I i\nONLY two words are needed to\ntell of the valuable Bulletins is-\nsued by the Smithsonian Institute, Wash-*\nington, and everyone who knows but\none of them will want to see the\nothers.\nThese Bulletins, together with the\nGeographical Magazine, form the most\nserious and the most brilliant publica-\ntion which America issues,\nThey contain little of Theatric in-\nterest and you have to search carefully *\nto find even that little: but the search\nis worth while."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c150", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c150", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "189", "page_fin": "190", "image_debut": 105, "image_fin": 106, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.30", "titre_corps": "MAGAZINES", "titre_sommaire": "MAGAZINES", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 105, "page_imprimee": "189", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.105", "debut_caractere": 6360, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6506, "texte": "MAGAZINES.\n\nTHE \" Theatre Arts Monthly\ncontinues to do as well as ever;\nindeed better, since it is giving us\nmore information of American theatres"}, {"page_pdf": 106, "page_imprimee": "190", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.106", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4739, "texte": "of the last century, and abstaining from\ntoo much speculation about the new\nmovement in Europe.\nBut for all this Mr Macgowan has\na fling at that movement in a recent\nnumber and the fling fails.\nHe supposes that this New Move~\nment was started and planned for a\nshort run. He lives in a land where\n(so I hear) a house of ten stories is\noften built to last but a year and to\nbe swept away and another built on\nits site, and this, second, house in its\nturn is broken up for a third to be\nraised, and all this in the space of\neight or nine years.\nMuch as we must all adore Ame-\nrica we never cared a straw for that\nsort of thing. And so Mr Macgowan\nis wrong to suppose that anyone in\nthe year 1925 can sum up the results\nin America of the seed sown in 1900,\nThe results will be seen, I should\nguess, about the year 1960 or 2000.\nThe amiable writer manifests his\nway of seeing things wrong by clai-\nming that the old Park Theatre,\nNew York, of 1805 44 might have\ndelighted Palladio, Inigo Jones and\nCopeau in equal measure Whether\nit delights Copeau remains to be dis-\ncovered; but no one who knows any-\nthing of the work of Palladio and\nJones can have a moment's hope that\nit would have given these men anything\nbut excrutiating delight of a ribald kind.\nAppia and Craig it seems, according\nto Macgowan, are not doing as they\nfondly suppose they are, but they have\nbeen for years 44 fighting the battle of\nrealism against artificiality \".\nIf we did not hold that Mr Mac-\ngowan had done some good service to\nthe New Movement we should put\nhim down as a bit of an ignoramus\nand a very sleepy fellow. The fact\nis, America hustles him along witlFsome\nmillions more of its good boys and true,\nand he is not allowed the time to stop\nand think twice or three times over a\nmatter—or, say, seven or eight times.\nIn Europe it is still customary to give\nmost of the time to thinking so as to\nsee and to understand, and a few hours\nto the writing down the conclusions.\nIn America three minutes are al-\nlowed for thought and one glimpse is\npermitted, and then copy has to be\nready by six o'clock the same evening.\nAlways bear this in mind when rea-\nding the 44 Theatre Arts Monthly \"\nand you'll never bear a single one of\nthe boys any ill will:—but, if you fail\nto remember it, its ten to one you'll grow\nwaxy as did St John Ervine, or, worse\nstill, contemptuous like some of his\nbetters.\ni 44 Ah ! but the potentialities of Ame-\n' rica—think of the potentialities \" says\nthe American.\n; Potentiality is possession of dominant\npower, possibility of action, and Ame-\nrica is not holding back anything; nothing\n' is allowed to lie dormant : all is exploi-\nted the moment it has been netted : to\n■ net it, to bag it, the young fellows come\nover to Europe, and, as 44 The Lite-\nrary Digest \" puts it, 44 ransack Eu-\nrope on a Harvard travelling scho-\nlarship \". Exactly. Ransack Europe—\nand take back nothing in a bag.\nNo, dear and much admired Ameri-\ncans, not so will you ever come to own\nthe right to boast proudly that your land\nhas Potentialities. Your own Whitman\nhad potentialities when he was thirty\nand he had done it by himself and by\nwaiting. He absorbed all he could\nAsiatic and European—but he absor-\nbed more that was in the trees and lakes\nof his own land. Then he wrote a poem,\nhis 44 Song of Myself \", and became\nWhitman, not Tennyson-and-water.\nWE stick to it.... 44 The Review\nof Reviews \" is one of the very\nfew illuminating journals issued. Its\nAmerican version and the other ver-\nsions of the same notion are the others\nthat make up the few things to which\nwe refer. For here at a glance live\nfolly of the majority is revealed, and\nas a rule the minority is made to look\nas foolish.\nIt is only in the 44 Review of Re-\nviews \" that we can see that while\none half of England howls down\nMr. Churchill, the other half howls\ndown the last three or four Chancellors\nof the Exchequer, whoever they may\nbe; while the Premier is exe-\ncrated seemingly by 44 everyone \" today,\nevery other one execrated the late\nPremier yesterday. So everyone is\nbeing howled down.\nSides cease to exist in the 44 Review\nof Reviews \" for all are laid flat. It's\nlike Punch and Judy. Punch alone\nrules supreme. Be the governors po-\nwerful or vacillating, cruel or kind,\nall's one—they are all wrong.\nThe majority must chatter, must\nhave its way, must pull down, break,\nspoil and cry for the moon.\nThis the 45 Review of Reviews \" re-\nveals as no other journal ever has re-\nvealed, for it extracts all the howls, and\nof course all the praise where it can\nbe found, from all the journals and\nthese it reprints. Every man is exa ted\n—Rulers alone, whoever they be, are\ndegraded—not by the Review of Re-\nviews, for that Review has a ruler too,\nbut by the Laws of Democracy."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c151", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c151", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "189", "page_fin": "190", "image_debut": 105, "image_fin": 106, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.30.1", "titre_corps": "THE \" Theatre Arts Monthly", "titre_sommaire": "THE \" Theatre Arts Monthly", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 105, "page_imprimee": "189", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.105", "debut_caractere": 6372, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6506, "texte": "THE \" Theatre Arts Monthly\ncontinues to do as well as ever;\nindeed better, since it is giving us\nmore information of American theatres"}, {"page_pdf": 106, "page_imprimee": "190", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.106", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4739, "texte": "of the last century, and abstaining from\ntoo much speculation about the new\nmovement in Europe.\nBut for all this Mr Macgowan has\na fling at that movement in a recent\nnumber and the fling fails.\nHe supposes that this New Move~\nment was started and planned for a\nshort run. He lives in a land where\n(so I hear) a house of ten stories is\noften built to last but a year and to\nbe swept away and another built on\nits site, and this, second, house in its\nturn is broken up for a third to be\nraised, and all this in the space of\neight or nine years.\nMuch as we must all adore Ame-\nrica we never cared a straw for that\nsort of thing. And so Mr Macgowan\nis wrong to suppose that anyone in\nthe year 1925 can sum up the results\nin America of the seed sown in 1900,\nThe results will be seen, I should\nguess, about the year 1960 or 2000.\nThe amiable writer manifests his\nway of seeing things wrong by clai-\nming that the old Park Theatre,\nNew York, of 1805 44 might have\ndelighted Palladio, Inigo Jones and\nCopeau in equal measure Whether\nit delights Copeau remains to be dis-\ncovered; but no one who knows any-\nthing of the work of Palladio and\nJones can have a moment's hope that\nit would have given these men anything\nbut excrutiating delight of a ribald kind.\nAppia and Craig it seems, according\nto Macgowan, are not doing as they\nfondly suppose they are, but they have\nbeen for years 44 fighting the battle of\nrealism against artificiality \".\nIf we did not hold that Mr Mac-\ngowan had done some good service to\nthe New Movement we should put\nhim down as a bit of an ignoramus\nand a very sleepy fellow. The fact\nis, America hustles him along witlFsome\nmillions more of its good boys and true,\nand he is not allowed the time to stop\nand think twice or three times over a\nmatter—or, say, seven or eight times.\nIn Europe it is still customary to give\nmost of the time to thinking so as to\nsee and to understand, and a few hours\nto the writing down the conclusions.\nIn America three minutes are al-\nlowed for thought and one glimpse is\npermitted, and then copy has to be\nready by six o'clock the same evening.\nAlways bear this in mind when rea-\nding the 44 Theatre Arts Monthly \"\nand you'll never bear a single one of\nthe boys any ill will:—but, if you fail\nto remember it, its ten to one you'll grow\nwaxy as did St John Ervine, or, worse\nstill, contemptuous like some of his\nbetters.\ni 44 Ah ! but the potentialities of Ame-\n' rica—think of the potentialities \" says\nthe American.\n; Potentiality is possession of dominant\npower, possibility of action, and Ame-\nrica is not holding back anything; nothing\n' is allowed to lie dormant : all is exploi-\nted the moment it has been netted : to\n■ net it, to bag it, the young fellows come\nover to Europe, and, as 44 The Lite-\nrary Digest \" puts it, 44 ransack Eu-\nrope on a Harvard travelling scho-\nlarship \". Exactly. Ransack Europe—\nand take back nothing in a bag.\nNo, dear and much admired Ameri-\ncans, not so will you ever come to own\nthe right to boast proudly that your land\nhas Potentialities. Your own Whitman\nhad potentialities when he was thirty\nand he had done it by himself and by\nwaiting. He absorbed all he could\nAsiatic and European—but he absor-\nbed more that was in the trees and lakes\nof his own land. Then he wrote a poem,\nhis 44 Song of Myself \", and became\nWhitman, not Tennyson-and-water.\nWE stick to it.... 44 The Review\nof Reviews \" is one of the very\nfew illuminating journals issued. Its\nAmerican version and the other ver-\nsions of the same notion are the others\nthat make up the few things to which\nwe refer. For here at a glance live\nfolly of the majority is revealed, and\nas a rule the minority is made to look\nas foolish.\nIt is only in the 44 Review of Re-\nviews \" that we can see that while\none half of England howls down\nMr. Churchill, the other half howls\ndown the last three or four Chancellors\nof the Exchequer, whoever they may\nbe; while the Premier is exe-\ncrated seemingly by 44 everyone \" today,\nevery other one execrated the late\nPremier yesterday. So everyone is\nbeing howled down.\nSides cease to exist in the 44 Review\nof Reviews \" for all are laid flat. It's\nlike Punch and Judy. Punch alone\nrules supreme. Be the governors po-\nwerful or vacillating, cruel or kind,\nall's one—they are all wrong.\nThe majority must chatter, must\nhave its way, must pull down, break,\nspoil and cry for the moon.\nThis the 45 Review of Reviews \" re-\nveals as no other journal ever has re-\nvealed, for it extracts all the howls, and\nof course all the praise where it can\nbe found, from all the journals and\nthese it reprints. Every man is exa ted\n—Rulers alone, whoever they be, are\ndegraded—not by the Review of Re-\nviews, for that Review has a ruler too,\nbut by the Laws of Democracy."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c152", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c152", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "190", "page_fin": "192", "image_debut": 106, "image_fin": 108, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.31", "titre_corps": "EDITORIAL NOTES", "titre_sommaire": "EDITORIAL NOTES", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 106, "page_imprimee": "190", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.106", "debut_caractere": 4741, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6726, "texte": "EDITORIAL NOTES.\n\nOUTBURST IN\nBBOAA—BOMB—K—a ■ ■■■ rk RNINRMWI I w~m r IIW m 1111——«C»BI\nWHEN Mr. St. John Ervine, in\nhis famous speech delivered at\nthe Authors' Club on October 22nd\n1923, declared that we in England\nwere passing through a period of tran-\nsition from masculine feminine, and\ndeteriorating too, he was obviously\nrude but probably right: when he ad-\nded that owing to feminine predomi-\nnance tragedy vanished and its place\nwas taken by comedy, he was growing\nrather more polite and a little vague :\nbut, by the time he had wound up by\nsaying that if the writers wanted to\nget the world back on to decent lines\nthey had to start off with the gloomiest\npossible view of it, he had descended\nto the honied small talk of the draw-\ningrooms and was utterly wrong.\nWriters do not get the world back ;\n—if writers do anything with the world\nthey fan it or poke it as it goes for-\nwards on its own career. It is much\nto be one of the world's lacqueys,\noutrunners, or pages, and the artists,\nwriters and acrobats are all just about\nthat.\nMr. Ervine is rather like that lady\nof the other day who, at the end of\nthe second act of \" Fallen Angels \"\nstood up in a box at the Globe Thea-\ntre, London and said that, as a mem-\nber of the British public she protes-\nted.. ; at which the other nine hun-\ndred and ninety-nine members of that\nBritish public broke in more rudely\nand said 4# sit down \".\nIt was not a man, you note, who\nrose up and protested against the co-\nmedy as Mr. Ervine would have us\nsuppose : on the contrary, a man did\nrise up later from a stall afcd remark\nthat he had come to the theatre to be\namused and that he 'did not relish\nhaving his amusement interrupted in\nthe ladylike Ervine way. But the lady\nhaving blundered, (just like Ervine)\nblundered on and said she wasn't going\naway and that what she thought of\nNoel Coward was..., at which her voice\nwas drowned by the nine hundred and\nninety nine British Publicans male and\nfemale, and no one noticed if she did"}, {"page_pdf": 107, "page_imprimee": "191", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.107", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6886, "texte": "or didn't 44 go away \". She would\nhave been a fool not to.\nWe haven't seen 44 Fallen Angels \",\nand we have not read it though aw-\nfully keen to read it now. Nor have\nwe heard what it's about; or whether\ngood, bad or indifferent : but we have\nseen and heard too many ladies in\nLondon protesting. Some protest quietly,\nbut we prefer the Ervine kind. Of\ncourse it's a bit vain to up and tell\na whopper openly, but it shows a bit\nof Ervinism. Honest honest Ervine, he\nreally is a very proper sort of a duf.\nfer: whereas the other kind of lady\nwho protests quietly, damning things\nin the meanest way, is the lady we\nlike least. She'll not say out that its\na damnable play, be it by Coward,\nMaugham or Ervine. She'll say the\nauthor smells; or 'tis a pity he's so\ndirty; or that he has no windows in\nhis house. We know of two celebra-\nted ladies (one is now dead,... had a\npublic funeral too : the other may have\none) who both attempted to damn\ntwo artists (one of them our best\nplaywright) in the way we state. This\nis why we rather admire old Ervine\nand the protesting lady of the Globe\ntheatre.\nBut all of them, all these theatre going\ncritics, have the wrong notion in their\nhead. They go to see a play in the\nwrong way. The only way to go is\nfor an evening's amusement or refresh-\nment ; and the sole way to do this is\nto go there passively, leaving any sense\nof one's own importance and all one's\nown fixed ideas at the box-office with\none's 10/6.\nProtesters are not the public and\nare generally dead-heads; they get tic-\nkets somehow for nothing. 44 The pu-\nblic \" is no one but he who pays; and\nhe who pays, unless he is a fool, is\nnever going to a theatre to protest. We\nalways pay for our tickets, and when\nwe don't enjoy the comedy, well, the\ndisappointment sharpens us up. Besides,\nthere is generally something good in\nevery evening's entertainment, and it\nis folly to annoy oneself or one's fel-\nlow theatre-goer during the evening.\nThe dramas written today are good\nor bad in as much as the conditions\ngoverning us are good or bad.\nAt least so it seems to us; and, in\na letter received on this very point\nfrom M. Francois M. Florian. (dated\n44 September 1st, at the hour of 11. 45\nbetween Vilvoorden and Bruxelies\")\nhe would seem to agree with us. He\nsays; 44 if you don't like the kind of\nplays a country produces you must\nchange the conditions prevailing in the\nland if you want better \"; and he\ncontinues: 44 That is * how it seems to\n44 me as I wander from city to city.\n44 Half my life is spent in a second-\n44 class compartment of a French, Ita-\n44 lian or German train, and I must\n44 say I prefer your English trains and\n44 their third class carriages. But Iam\n44 never going to grumble at the others....\n441 pay my 153 lire or my 73 francs\n44 and thank the directors with a full\n44 heart whenever I hear that old cry\n44 44 Premier Service \". The Train\n44 game and the Theatre game are\n44 alike in this, that one must ' play\n44 the game ' as you say in both ca-\n44 ses. Ervine and that lady and the\n44 other ladies you wrote me of are\n44 playing some other game—la crosee\n44 may be \".\n\nBRITISH OPERA.\nIN our last issue we voiced the sen-\ntiment of many millions of Briti-\nshers ; ie, that British Opera should be\nBritish and be damned to the foreign\nstuff, till it was more British.\nProfessor Nicoll voices a fine mino-\nrity of folk who believe Art to be In-\nternational (0.\nWhat we said was not that the Bri-\ntish National Opera Company does not\nperform one British Opera, but does\nperform too many foreign Operas.\nIf it performed Purcell and Macken-\nzie and Sullivan and Delius and a do-\nzen others—Dent, Shaw, Bantock—all\nof them, we should not have blamed\nit for taking such a name as the Bri-\ntish National Opera Company.\nProfessor Nicoll avoids the point.\nWho objects to Rossini, Bizet, Wag-\nner, Debussy and the others. Their\nworks are adorable—but they must not\nflourish, and be flourished by us, till\nthe operas of Britishers are also being\nproduced. All of us would then wel-\ncome the foreign work. Why must we\nin England have Wagner plus Reinhardt\nforced on us and not be allowed to\nhave Purcell plus Craig as a pre-\nlude ?\nMr. Smith has touched on this ten-\ndency in his Reply in these columns\nthis quarter (2). We wish England would\nrouse up and do more than merely\ntouch on it :—we wish that the Press\nwould bring it home once and for all\nto the English people that they are\nbeing cheated of our best artists, both\nthe dead masters and their living fol-\nlowers,\n(1) See page 163-4.\n(2) See page 164-6.\n\nMISREPRESENTATION\n*' Vous I'avez voulu, vous Tavez voulu,\nGeorges Dandin \".\nWELL now, who'd have thought it.\nIt appears that Gordon Craig's\nschool has 44 sought to make the actor\n44 more remote, masking him, robbing\n44 him of personality, so that he should\n44 seem isolated, a creature a different\n44 birth At least that is what 44 The\nLabour Monthly recently asserted.\nThat interesting publication knows a\ngood deal.... same as hundreds of 44 La-\nbour \" folk, — whatever 44 Labour \" is.\nWe too have laboured, and yet we\ncannot bring ourselves to feel isolated,\nand 44 Labour \" is only an awfully iso-\nlated thing if it stands itself aloof from\nall other things. To be so stern about\nit, to feel that a special name—ie La-\nhour—is needed to denote what we\nalways supposed was a little universe!\nand everyday act, strikes us now and\nagain as rather far fetched.\nTo be remote, to rob the actor of\ntrue personality, is the last notion to\nappeal to the Gordon Craig School,\nof that we are quite sure. So M. E.\nof the Labour Monthly must give us\nanother chance if he feels like it,\nand give another guess. This one was\nwrong. In the age when men were\nnearest to the ideals of Socialism, ac-\ntors were masked. Not to make them\naloof—remote—isolated, but solely for\na technical reason. It makes for mud-\ndled thought to feel as M. E. feels.\nBut then a good Conservative in\nEngland would also object to a mask-\ned actor; or to a really good actor\nwere he masked or not. A Liberal\nwould agree with the Conservative and\nthe Socialist here. In fact very few\nmen if they get tied up to a political\nparty can cut away from it all at the\nsensible moment and revel in Theatri-\ncals, and so they miss very much.\nAll thought of party in a playhouse\nbrings there a host of suspicions.\n44 He is doing this for a reason \"\nmurmurs the Citizen Smith: Sir M,\nE. Smith is equally sure of that too—\nbut for the opposite reason Wil-\nliam Mc. Black-Smith, the judge,\nis positive of it and the other Smiths\ndisagree with all these and hold to\ntheir opinion which is that there's a\nmotive behind that Mask—a fell pur-\npose hidden behind this backcloth, and\nthose pink lights mean a certain loss\nof votes at the next election. All of\nwhich is fiddle-faddle. Artists are not\nclever like that—they can do a bit in\ntheir own line but that's not the line.\nThey hold very few views and sel-"}, {"page_pdf": 108, "page_imprimee": "192", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.108", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1511, "texte": "dom an opinion—except on technical\nmatters, and they strive to enjoy them-\nselves in their work and give pleasure,\nAnd this they often succeed in doing.\nWhy should our good friend M. E.\ngo for the Gordon Craig School when\nthe Gordon Craig School only has\none aim, to do some good work—do\nit well —and to give some pleasure ?\nIt s a pity. But then hundreds of\nfolk in England are for ever going for\nthings about which they are mistaken,\nThey have that smallest of passions—\nthe passion for trying to bring us all\nup—to form us after their own like-\nness. Fearful loss of time—absurd path\nto wander in and get lost.\nAnd so we have no Theatre in\nEngland. Everyone wants it to be as\nhe wants. Ask him what it is he\nwants and he can't give a sound ans-\nwer. Yet he wont have Craig—he\nwon't have Barker; he won't have\nanything except what he wants.\nAnd so that's all he gels. Isn't it\ntime for them to sit quiet for a bit—and\nlet the artists give the Public their best ?\nThe artist can do that but he can't do\nmore : and while everyone of the public\nis giving an opinion in the different Dai-\nlies, Weeklies and Monthlies, the artist\ncannot even begin to give you his best.\nAfter all, what he knows he can\ngive you must be rather better than\nanything you can think of for yourselves;\nbut there of course you don't agree,\nAnd your opinion is of more value to\nyou than his art :—well then have and\nhold to your opinion. But don't ask for\nthings to be better—for now they are\nprecisely as you wanted them, George\nDandin."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c154", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c154", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "190", "page_fin": "191", "image_debut": 106, "image_fin": 107, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.31.2", "titre_corps": "OUTBURST IN", "titre_sommaire": "OUTBURST IN", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 106, "page_imprimee": "190", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.106", "debut_caractere": 4759, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6726, "texte": "OUTBURST IN\nBBOAA—BOMB—K—a ■ ■■■ rk RNINRMWI I w~m r IIW m 1111——«C»BI\nWHEN Mr. St. John Ervine, in\nhis famous speech delivered at\nthe Authors' Club on October 22nd\n1923, declared that we in England\nwere passing through a period of tran-\nsition from masculine feminine, and\ndeteriorating too, he was obviously\nrude but probably right: when he ad-\nded that owing to feminine predomi-\nnance tragedy vanished and its place\nwas taken by comedy, he was growing\nrather more polite and a little vague :\nbut, by the time he had wound up by\nsaying that if the writers wanted to\nget the world back on to decent lines\nthey had to start off with the gloomiest\npossible view of it, he had descended\nto the honied small talk of the draw-\ningrooms and was utterly wrong.\nWriters do not get the world back ;\n—if writers do anything with the world\nthey fan it or poke it as it goes for-\nwards on its own career. It is much\nto be one of the world's lacqueys,\noutrunners, or pages, and the artists,\nwriters and acrobats are all just about\nthat.\nMr. Ervine is rather like that lady\nof the other day who, at the end of\nthe second act of \" Fallen Angels \"\nstood up in a box at the Globe Thea-\ntre, London and said that, as a mem-\nber of the British public she protes-\nted.. ; at which the other nine hun-\ndred and ninety-nine members of that\nBritish public broke in more rudely\nand said 4# sit down \".\nIt was not a man, you note, who\nrose up and protested against the co-\nmedy as Mr. Ervine would have us\nsuppose : on the contrary, a man did\nrise up later from a stall afcd remark\nthat he had come to the theatre to be\namused and that he 'did not relish\nhaving his amusement interrupted in\nthe ladylike Ervine way. But the lady\nhaving blundered, (just like Ervine)\nblundered on and said she wasn't going\naway and that what she thought of\nNoel Coward was..., at which her voice\nwas drowned by the nine hundred and\nninety nine British Publicans male and\nfemale, and no one noticed if she did"}, {"page_pdf": 107, "page_imprimee": "191", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.107", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 3098, "texte": "or didn't 44 go away \". She would\nhave been a fool not to.\nWe haven't seen 44 Fallen Angels \",\nand we have not read it though aw-\nfully keen to read it now. Nor have\nwe heard what it's about; or whether\ngood, bad or indifferent : but we have\nseen and heard too many ladies in\nLondon protesting. Some protest quietly,\nbut we prefer the Ervine kind. Of\ncourse it's a bit vain to up and tell\na whopper openly, but it shows a bit\nof Ervinism. Honest honest Ervine, he\nreally is a very proper sort of a duf.\nfer: whereas the other kind of lady\nwho protests quietly, damning things\nin the meanest way, is the lady we\nlike least. She'll not say out that its\na damnable play, be it by Coward,\nMaugham or Ervine. She'll say the\nauthor smells; or 'tis a pity he's so\ndirty; or that he has no windows in\nhis house. We know of two celebra-\nted ladies (one is now dead,... had a\npublic funeral too : the other may have\none) who both attempted to damn\ntwo artists (one of them our best\nplaywright) in the way we state. This\nis why we rather admire old Ervine\nand the protesting lady of the Globe\ntheatre.\nBut all of them, all these theatre going\ncritics, have the wrong notion in their\nhead. They go to see a play in the\nwrong way. The only way to go is\nfor an evening's amusement or refresh-\nment ; and the sole way to do this is\nto go there passively, leaving any sense\nof one's own importance and all one's\nown fixed ideas at the box-office with\none's 10/6.\nProtesters are not the public and\nare generally dead-heads; they get tic-\nkets somehow for nothing. 44 The pu-\nblic \" is no one but he who pays; and\nhe who pays, unless he is a fool, is\nnever going to a theatre to protest. We\nalways pay for our tickets, and when\nwe don't enjoy the comedy, well, the\ndisappointment sharpens us up. Besides,\nthere is generally something good in\nevery evening's entertainment, and it\nis folly to annoy oneself or one's fel-\nlow theatre-goer during the evening.\nThe dramas written today are good\nor bad in as much as the conditions\ngoverning us are good or bad.\nAt least so it seems to us; and, in\na letter received on this very point\nfrom M. Francois M. Florian. (dated\n44 September 1st, at the hour of 11. 45\nbetween Vilvoorden and Bruxelies\")\nhe would seem to agree with us. He\nsays; 44 if you don't like the kind of\nplays a country produces you must\nchange the conditions prevailing in the\nland if you want better \"; and he\ncontinues: 44 That is * how it seems to\n44 me as I wander from city to city.\n44 Half my life is spent in a second-\n44 class compartment of a French, Ita-\n44 lian or German train, and I must\n44 say I prefer your English trains and\n44 their third class carriages. But Iam\n44 never going to grumble at the others....\n441 pay my 153 lire or my 73 francs\n44 and thank the directors with a full\n44 heart whenever I hear that old cry\n44 44 Premier Service \". The Train\n44 game and the Theatre game are\n44 alike in this, that one must ' play\n44 the game ' as you say in both ca-\n44 ses. Ervine and that lady and the\n44 other ladies you wrote me of are\n44 playing some other game—la crosee\n44 may be \"."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c155", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c155", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "191", "page_fin": "191", "image_debut": 107, "image_fin": 107, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.31.3", "titre_corps": "BRITISH OPERA", "titre_sommaire": "BRITISH OPERA", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 107, "page_imprimee": "191", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.107", "debut_caractere": 3100, "fin_caractere_exclue": 4529, "texte": "BRITISH OPERA.\nIN our last issue we voiced the sen-\ntiment of many millions of Briti-\nshers ; ie, that British Opera should be\nBritish and be damned to the foreign\nstuff, till it was more British.\nProfessor Nicoll voices a fine mino-\nrity of folk who believe Art to be In-\nternational (0.\nWhat we said was not that the Bri-\ntish National Opera Company does not\nperform one British Opera, but does\nperform too many foreign Operas.\nIf it performed Purcell and Macken-\nzie and Sullivan and Delius and a do-\nzen others—Dent, Shaw, Bantock—all\nof them, we should not have blamed\nit for taking such a name as the Bri-\ntish National Opera Company.\nProfessor Nicoll avoids the point.\nWho objects to Rossini, Bizet, Wag-\nner, Debussy and the others. Their\nworks are adorable—but they must not\nflourish, and be flourished by us, till\nthe operas of Britishers are also being\nproduced. All of us would then wel-\ncome the foreign work. Why must we\nin England have Wagner plus Reinhardt\nforced on us and not be allowed to\nhave Purcell plus Craig as a pre-\nlude ?\nMr. Smith has touched on this ten-\ndency in his Reply in these columns\nthis quarter (2). We wish England would\nrouse up and do more than merely\ntouch on it :—we wish that the Press\nwould bring it home once and for all\nto the English people that they are\nbeing cheated of our best artists, both\nthe dead masters and their living fol-\nlowers,\n(1) See page 163-4.\n(2) See page 164-6."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c156", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c156", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "191", "page_fin": "192", "image_debut": 107, "image_fin": 108, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.31.4", "titre_corps": "MISREPRESENTATION", "titre_sommaire": "MISREPRESENTATION", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 107, "page_imprimee": "191", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.107", "debut_caractere": 4531, "fin_caractere_exclue": 6886, "texte": "MISREPRESENTATION\n*' Vous I'avez voulu, vous Tavez voulu,\nGeorges Dandin \".\nWELL now, who'd have thought it.\nIt appears that Gordon Craig's\nschool has 44 sought to make the actor\n44 more remote, masking him, robbing\n44 him of personality, so that he should\n44 seem isolated, a creature a different\n44 birth At least that is what 44 The\nLabour Monthly recently asserted.\nThat interesting publication knows a\ngood deal.... same as hundreds of 44 La-\nbour \" folk, — whatever 44 Labour \" is.\nWe too have laboured, and yet we\ncannot bring ourselves to feel isolated,\nand 44 Labour \" is only an awfully iso-\nlated thing if it stands itself aloof from\nall other things. To be so stern about\nit, to feel that a special name—ie La-\nhour—is needed to denote what we\nalways supposed was a little universe!\nand everyday act, strikes us now and\nagain as rather far fetched.\nTo be remote, to rob the actor of\ntrue personality, is the last notion to\nappeal to the Gordon Craig School,\nof that we are quite sure. So M. E.\nof the Labour Monthly must give us\nanother chance if he feels like it,\nand give another guess. This one was\nwrong. In the age when men were\nnearest to the ideals of Socialism, ac-\ntors were masked. Not to make them\naloof—remote—isolated, but solely for\na technical reason. It makes for mud-\ndled thought to feel as M. E. feels.\nBut then a good Conservative in\nEngland would also object to a mask-\ned actor; or to a really good actor\nwere he masked or not. A Liberal\nwould agree with the Conservative and\nthe Socialist here. In fact very few\nmen if they get tied up to a political\nparty can cut away from it all at the\nsensible moment and revel in Theatri-\ncals, and so they miss very much.\nAll thought of party in a playhouse\nbrings there a host of suspicions.\n44 He is doing this for a reason \"\nmurmurs the Citizen Smith: Sir M,\nE. Smith is equally sure of that too—\nbut for the opposite reason Wil-\nliam Mc. Black-Smith, the judge,\nis positive of it and the other Smiths\ndisagree with all these and hold to\ntheir opinion which is that there's a\nmotive behind that Mask—a fell pur-\npose hidden behind this backcloth, and\nthose pink lights mean a certain loss\nof votes at the next election. All of\nwhich is fiddle-faddle. Artists are not\nclever like that—they can do a bit in\ntheir own line but that's not the line.\nThey hold very few views and sel-"}, {"page_pdf": 108, "page_imprimee": "192", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.108", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1511, "texte": "dom an opinion—except on technical\nmatters, and they strive to enjoy them-\nselves in their work and give pleasure,\nAnd this they often succeed in doing.\nWhy should our good friend M. E.\ngo for the Gordon Craig School when\nthe Gordon Craig School only has\none aim, to do some good work—do\nit well —and to give some pleasure ?\nIt s a pity. But then hundreds of\nfolk in England are for ever going for\nthings about which they are mistaken,\nThey have that smallest of passions—\nthe passion for trying to bring us all\nup—to form us after their own like-\nness. Fearful loss of time—absurd path\nto wander in and get lost.\nAnd so we have no Theatre in\nEngland. Everyone wants it to be as\nhe wants. Ask him what it is he\nwants and he can't give a sound ans-\nwer. Yet he wont have Craig—he\nwon't have Barker; he won't have\nanything except what he wants.\nAnd so that's all he gels. Isn't it\ntime for them to sit quiet for a bit—and\nlet the artists give the Public their best ?\nThe artist can do that but he can't do\nmore : and while everyone of the public\nis giving an opinion in the different Dai-\nlies, Weeklies and Monthlies, the artist\ncannot even begin to give you his best.\nAfter all, what he knows he can\ngive you must be rather better than\nanything you can think of for yourselves;\nbut there of course you don't agree,\nAnd your opinion is of more value to\nyou than his art :—well then have and\nhold to your opinion. But don't ask for\nthings to be better—for now they are\nprecisely as you wanted them, George\nDandin."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c157", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c157", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "192", "page_fin": "192", "image_debut": 108, "image_fin": 108, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.32", "titre_corps": "A SYMPOSIUM REPLY", "titre_sommaire": "A SYMPOSIUM REPLY", "signature_source": "J. S", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 108, "page_imprimee": "192", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.108", "debut_caractere": 1513, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2495, "texte": "A SYMPOSIUM REPLY.\nJ. S.\n\nHaving just received this reply from Mr\nMax Beerbohm we print it on this last page\nof the volume rather than hold it over for\nthe January number.\n1. They were joined together, forming a\nsquare.\nExactly why this was done is and will\nalways be debateable.\n2. Prof. Guilliatri maintains that it was\n\" La Nobil Donna Macbetti \" (on which\nShakespeare founded his well-known tragedy).\n3. Three scenes ? Three ? three hundred\nwas the average on ordinary evenings. On\nfestas they totted up to 3,000,000 and more.\n4. It is both. San Gallo was an unblush-\ning plagiarist. Reinhardt, as compared with\nhim, is original and crimson-cheeked.\n1B. The ospitiiwere the hospiti, the guests;\nin modern parlance the free list, or \" paper\n2B. Teatro comes from the Latin theatrum\nwhich comes from the Greek ©eaxpov which\ncomes from ©£0|iat? which means I see.\n3B. Foro & foyer. It was much used by\nthe audience during the intratti (entr'actes)\nand also during the atti (actes)."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c158", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c158", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "192", "page_fin": "192", "image_debut": 108, "image_fin": 108, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.32.1", "titre_corps": "Diagram 1", "titre_sommaire": "Diagram 1", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 108, "page_imprimee": "192", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.108", "debut_caractere": 2497, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2507, "texte": "Diagram I."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c159", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c159", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "192", "page_fin": "192", "image_debut": 108, "image_fin": 108, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.32.2", "titre_corps": "Diagram 2", "titre_sommaire": "Diagram 2", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 108, "page_imprimee": "192", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.108", "debut_caractere": 2509, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2519, "texte": "Diagram 2."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c161", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c161", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "192", "page_fin": "192", "image_debut": 108, "image_fin": 108, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.33", "titre_corps": "A DEBT TO DOSTOEVSKI", "titre_sommaire": "A DEBT TO DOSTOEVSKI", "signature_source": "J. S", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 108, "page_imprimee": "192", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.108", "debut_caractere": 2521, "fin_caractere_exclue": 3836, "texte": "A DEBT TO DOSTOEVSKI.\nJ. S.\nMR. Hugh Walpole, writing to \"The\nTimes \", informs us that owing\nto the Russian Revolution, the sole\nsurviving member of the Dostoevski\nfamily, Miss Aim6e Dostoevski, is left\nwithout resources and that she is ill in\nSwitzerland. Russia did not enter the\nCopyright Convention till Dostoevski's\nworks had been translated into al-\nmost every European language, so the\ngreat writer's family never received a\npenny from these European and Ame-\nrican translations —and we know how\nfew pennies he received for his works in\nhis own Russia and how he was dri-\nven to his writing.\nAnyhow some two years ago a fund\nwas started in Switzerland by friends\nand admirers of Miss Dostoevski, but\nthe fund was exhausted last August.\nMr. Walpole informs us that 44 the\nsmallest sums contributed to this fund,\naddressed Dostoevski Fund, C/o Comp-\ntoir d'Escompte de Geneve, Rue du\nSimplon, Vevey, will be thankfully re-\nceived and acknowledged\". We have\nsent a small sum and we hope that\none or two of our readers who have\nby chance not seen 44 The Times\"\nletters will send along too; — for,\nif they can believe it, these i requests\nare sometimes not responded to as\nquickly as one would suppose.\nSomething comes in between the\nimpulse and the deed and nothing is\ndone.\nSo in remembrance of the great\nwriter"}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c163", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c163", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "193", "page_fin": "193", "image_debut": 109, "image_fin": 109, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.34", "titre_corps": "[Publicité]", "titre_sommaire": "[Publicité]", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 109, "page_imprimee": "193", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.109", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 918, "texte": "BHEBODBHMHHKaSI\n§®j\n♦\nLtd ❖\nANNOUNCE\nA NEW BOOK by GORDON CRAIG\nBOOKS & THEATRES\nWith about thirty Illustrations\n#\nThis delightful volume contains a collection of Essays about books in general and the\ntheatre in particular, told with the freshness and charm which characterised the author's\nWoodcuts and Some Words. The volume is illustrated with a remarkable series of\nphotographs of old Italian Theatres, etc.\nPROSPECTUS POST FREE\nRoyal 8vo. lis. Sd. net.\nBy the same Author\nWOODCUTS & SOME WORDS. Sq. Royal 4to. Limited Edition £, 3.3.0 net,\nSmall Fcap 4to, 10s. 6d. net.\nTOWARDS A NEW THEATRE. Sq. Royal 4to, 26s. net.\nPIRANDELLO'S PLAYS IN ENGLISH\nSix Characters in Search of an Author, Henry IV, Right You Are. In One Volume 6s. net.\nAlso: Each in His Own Way : The Pleasure of Honesty: Naked. The Three Plays\nin one Volume, io.y. 6d. net.\nq WRITE FOR AUTUMN LIST\nALDINE HOUSE. 66 CHANDOS STREET. LONDON W. C. 2."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c164", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c164", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "193", "page_fin": "193", "image_debut": 109, "image_fin": 109, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.35", "titre_corps": "[Publicité]", "titre_sommaire": "[Publicité]", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 109, "page_imprimee": "193", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.109", "debut_caractere": 920, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1700, "texte": "a\nJUST PUBLISHED.\nCUCHULAIN N\nAN EPIC DRAMA OF THE GAEL.\nBy TERENCE GRAY, Author of\n\" Hatshepsut \" etc.\nDemy cloth. Many illustrations. 12)6 net. Postage yd.\nThe author has woven into one vast circle the\nwonderful stories of ancient Ireland. His illustrations\nshow some novel stage-settings\nBy the same Author.\nDANCE DRAMA. Experiments in\nthe Art of the Theatre. Illustrated\nin line and colour.\nDemy 8vo. sewed, 5.?. net. (Postage 6d.)\nAn enthusiastic plea for the future of the Drama.\nSTAGE-LIGHTING FOR\n\" LITTLE \" THEATRES.\nby C. HAROLD RIDGE\nwith a Foreword by BASIL DEAN and an Intro-\nduction by TERENCE GRAY.\nDemy 8vo, cloth. Illustrated, net. (Postage id.)\nHow to achieve good effects at small cost and\ntrouble: with full diagrams.\nW. HE FEE R& SONS LTD.\nCAMBRIDGE. ENGLAND."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c165", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c165", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "193", "page_fin": "193", "image_debut": 109, "image_fin": 109, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.36", "titre_corps": "[Publicité]", "titre_sommaire": "[Publicité]", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 109, "page_imprimee": "193", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.109", "debut_caractere": 1702, "fin_caractere_exclue": 2034, "texte": "AN ITALIAN\nDICTIONARY\nBy A. HOARE, M. A.\nSecond, Edition. Demy 4to. 42s. net.\nThe work is recognized as the\nstandard Italian dictionary in this\ncountry.... The clear arrangement\nof the matter and the admirable\nprinting make the book a pleasure\nto consult \". — The Scotsman.\nO\nCAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS\nFETTER LANE. LONDON, E. C. 4."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c166", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c166", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "194", "page_fin": "194", "image_debut": 110, "image_fin": 110, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.37", "titre_corps": "[Publicité]", "titre_sommaire": "[Publicité]", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 110, "page_imprimee": "194", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.110", "debut_caractere": 0, "fin_caractere_exclue": 424, "texte": "GARDEN CITIES\nAND\nTOWN PLANNING\nIS THE ORGAN OF THE GARDEN\nCITIES & TOWN PLANNING ASSO-\nCIATION AND THE INTERNATIONAL\nFEDERATION FOR TOWN AND\nCOUNTRY PLANNING AND GARDEN\nCITIES. IT CONTAINS INFORMA-\nTION ABOUT HOUSING AND TOWN\nPLANNING QUESTIONS OF ALL\nOVER THE WORLD, AND IS ILLUS-\nTRATED WITH PPIOTOGRAPHS AND\nPLANS.\no\nTHE SUBSCRIPTION IS 73h\nPER ANNUM, POST FREE.\nO\nPUBLISHED A T,\n3, GRA Y'S INN PLA CE,\nLONDON, IV. C, 1."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c167", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c167", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "194", "page_fin": "194", "image_debut": 110, "image_fin": 110, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.38", "titre_corps": "[Publicité]", "titre_sommaire": "[Publicité]", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 110, "page_imprimee": "194", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.110", "debut_caractere": 426, "fin_caractere_exclue": 606, "texte": "CANTAGALLI\nARTISTIC MAJOLICAS\nARCHITECTURAL\nDECORATIONS\nREPRODUCTIONS OF\nWORKS OF\nDELLA ROBBIA\nO\nMANUFACTURY\nFLORENCE\n(PORTA ROMANA)\no\nBRANCH EST A BLISHMEN T\nROME\nVIA BABUINO 182."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c168", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c168", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "194", "page_fin": "194", "image_debut": 110, "image_fin": 110, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.39", "titre_corps": "[Publicité]", "titre_sommaire": "[Publicité]", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 110, "page_imprimee": "194", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.110", "debut_caractere": 608, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1044, "texte": "NOTES\nAND\nUER I E S\nA MEDIUM OF INTER-'\nCOMMUNICATION FOR\nLITERARY MEN, GENE-\nRAL READERS, ETC.\nF0UN D E D 1849.\na\nWEEKLY.\nPRICE 6d. POST FREE 7<J.\nANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION\n£ 1-15-4 post free.\n(Including' two Indexes).\nu\nTHE MASK\n(Volume 9, 1925) says :\nu Notes dk Queries \" is published\nby the Bucks. Free Press, 20\nHigh Wycombe. Bucks. England,\nfrom whom you will order it ifyou\nwant to enjoy one of the few\nunspoiled magazines of the day."}]}, {"article_id": "bm-bmtnaau-1925-10-01-c169", "article_bluemountain": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01#c169", "volume": "bmtnaau_1925-10_01", "ocr_source": "OCR Blue Mountain (ALTO), transcription TEI : lignes lb/@facs", "texte_sans_correction": true, "page_debut": "194", "page_fin": "194", "image_debut": 110, "image_fin": 110, "pages_selon": "pagination imprimée relevée dans le METS Blue Mountain (ORDERLABEL) ; [n] = page sans folio restituée", "url_article": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.2.40", "titre_corps": "[Publicité]", "titre_sommaire": "[Publicité]", "signature_source": "", "controle": "bornes données par la structure logique METS/ALTO de Blue Mountain (blocs ALTO de chaque constituant)", "pages": [{"page_pdf": 110, "page_imprimee": "194", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.110", "debut_caractere": 1046, "fin_caractere_exclue": 1370, "texte": "| PLACE A j\n| DEFINITE |\n| ORDER TO-DAY |\n| AR C HIT ECT U R E j\n1 A MAGAZINE OF g\nI Monthly ARCHITECTURE Subscnption Terms |\n1 !/\" AND THE ALLIED l4/\" 1\nI Post free 1/3 ARTS & CRAFTS per annum 1\n| OVER 50 PAGES J\n1 of Matter §\n1 and Illustrations s C 1\n1 PUBLISHERS, THE BUILDER, LTD.\n| CATHERINE ST. AND YORK ST., W.C.2. g"}]}], "pages_ocr_originales": [{"page_pdf": 2, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.2", "texte": "THE MAST<r\nT O i\n\nLA TOPOGRAF 1A D1 ROMA.\nDouble Plate of Nolli's Plan of Roma, independent of the other plates. Showing the whole Plan on a smaller scale, Piranesi, the Elder, has worked on this Plate.\nPlate 1."}, {"page_pdf": 3, "page_imprimee": "1", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.3", "texte": "T K\n\nFOREWORD\n\nIN Nolli's Plan of Roma, which is here offered for the\nfirst time in a handy form and at a popular price, we\nhave a leaf of genuine History, for it is all fact.\nBooks about the Roma of the 18th century may con-\ntain as much fancy as fact, and that in time renders them\nof little use to the historian. We talk of the Roman streets,\nof the Palaces, Theatres, Churches and other monuments;\nwe write of the Piazza Navona or the Palazzo Rospigliosi,\nand though all these may be known by hearsay to us they\nstill remain vague, ....vague as to position, form, size, and\nin their relation to their surroundings.\nWe may have seen these places, but. perhaps forgotten\none of them, and, certainly, quite forgotten where they are\nplaced, how surrounded, or how one reaches them from\nthe Porta del Popolo or from the Porta di S. Giovanni\nLaterano.\nAsk yourself to define the track leading from Porta\ndel Popolo to the Piazza Navona without looking at any"}, {"page_pdf": 4, "page_imprimee": "2", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.4", "texte": "plan. It is only a matter of pulling down a few street\n....but can you do it?\nTo save you the trouble here is Nolli. He can stanc\non your desk in his present form: in 1748 he was far to<\nbig a book to be handy: and even if you can get a cop)\nnow it is too large to serve you as reference book, for it i:\na folio of thirty six pages, and measures one foot sever\ninches by one foot two inches.\n4 4 The Mask \" having seen that, besides this plan oi\nRoma being one of the very best, it was used frequently bj\nthe most active students of the Theatre, thought that, by\nreducing it to a practical size it would be doing some ser-\nvice. So now you can have your Mollis Plan of Roma\nclose at hand to refer to when rereading the many books\nwhich deal with Roma, no matter what the subject. Not\nonly theatrical students but scholars of all kinds will find\nit useful.\nThe Plan illustrates many hundreds of books, but it\nalso corrects, and with authority, a number of them, sup-\nplementing others. Errors have sometimes crept into these\nDooks because the chief guide, ie Roma itself, was not\nproperly followed.\nNolli shows us eight Theatres, most of them very\nclearly defined. Teatro Alibert, 296:\nTeatro Argentina, 771:\nTeatro Capranica, 332:\nTeatro de' Granari, 618:\nTeatro della Pace, 611:\nTeatro della Pallaccorda, 444:\nTeatro di Tordinona, 536:\nTeatro della Valle, 795.\nBut we must not forget that this short list of eight thea-\ntres represents none but the 44 public playhouses \": and thai\nin many a palace was a magnificent Teatro privato oi\n»"}, {"page_pdf": 5, "page_imprimee": "3", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.5", "texte": "a Teatrino. And, lest we develope any wrong notion about\nRoma and its manner of doing things of this kind in the\nseventeenth and eighteenth Centuries, let us state what a\nprivate Theatre was not in those days.\nMerely because it was private, it was not anything\nwhich today we call \"amateurish but inasmuch as it was\nan \" amatore delle arti\", a lover of the arts, who devoted a\nlarge portion of his wealth and time to the care of his\nTeatro, so was the work amateurish, but only in this sense.\nDevoting time and money to his Teatro did not as\na rule mean that he interfered with the work, the con-\nstruction of the place, the production or composition of plays,\n>pera or ballet. Counts Pepoli and Albergatti, two of the\noremost amatori d'arte of Italy, did assuredly write plays,\ntnd perform in them; but as a rule the great people of\nloma made and kept their private theatres more for the\nentertainment of their guests and to avoid the inconvenien-\n:es of the public playhouses with their crush, draughts,\nloise and suffocation.\nAmongst those who had Private Theatres in Roma\nvere the Queen of Poland, Maria Casimira, who in 1709\nived in Pal azzo de Torres alia Trinita del Monte: Olimpia\n\\ldobrandini, the famous Principessa di Rossano; the\nSpanish Ambassador whose private theatre in the Spanish\n3alace was built in 1688: the Barberini family, whose\nheatre it is said seated 3000 people and was opened in\n1634. The Prince Galicano had a private Theatre at\nvhich Evelyn in 1645 witnessed \" a magnificent opera \".\nThen there was the teatro of Palazzo Rospigliosi; those of\n3alazzo Corsini; of Palazzo Colonna in Borgo, (the Co-\nonna family had it seems two private theatres, one of these\nmown as \" il grand teatro del Contestabile Colonna \"); of\nthe Palazzo Panfili in the Corso; and of the Collegio Ro-\nmano. The most fashionable theatre of 1639 was a pri-"}, {"page_pdf": 6, "page_imprimee": "4", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.6", "texte": "vate Theatre built by Bernini in the Fonderia del Yati-\ncano. Lastly there was the teatrino built for Cardinal Pietro\nOttoboni by Juvarra in about 1 700, a building of three\ntiers and most beautifully designed interior. We have seen\nthe almost unknown original designs. In 1678 during the\ncarneval there were 130 comedies given in the private\ntheatres of Roma.\nBut most of our readers probably know all about\nthese places and what was performed there, and the Plan\nis nnlv to serve as a means of locating their exact positions.\n\nJ. S."}, {"page_pdf": 7, "page_imprimee": "5", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.7", "texte": "A NEW PLAN OF ROMA\nBY GIOVAN BATTISTA NOLLI.(1)\nPUBLISHED IN THE YEAR MDCCXLVIII.\n(i)\nFOREWORD BY THE DESIGNER.\nALTHOUGH the leaves of the large Plan\nof Roma ought to be all united\ntogether, so as to have them all extended\nbefore the eye, as are usually all Geo-\ngraphical Maps, yet, if it should please\nanyone to have them bound, in book form,\nit is to be noted that, to be able to make\nuse of its indexes, desiring to find those\nBuildings or Places which are in the same\nPlan, it is necessary first to find in the\nalphabetical Index the name of that Buil-\nding or Place which one is seeking, and\nio see what is the number by which it\nts indicated on the sheets ; then the same\nnumber is found in the other numerical\nIndex, and in this wise one will know in\nwhich Rione it is described : and, seeing\nin that same Rione the number already\nfound, one will see the Place or Building\ndesired. At the top of each sheet are\nrepeated the Rione,and, some being de-\nscribed in a single sheet, others in several\nsh eets, there is indicated, beside the name\nof each one, those sheets in which some\npart of this same Rione is included, and\nin one of which there will be found the\nnumber of the Building, or Place, which\none seeks.\nRIONI OR DIVISIONS OF THE CITY.\nRione I. Monti Sheet 14. 15. 16. Rione VIII. S. Eustacio 19.\n20.21.22.27. « IX. Pigna 19.\n28.\n\" II. Trevi 20.21.26.27. X. Campitelli 6.9.14.15.19.\n\" III. Colonna 19. 20. 25. 26. \" Xl- S- AnSel° l9'\n27. \" XII. Ripa 5.6,8.12.13.\n\" IV. Campo Marzo 19. 25. 26. 19.\n\" V. Ponte 18.19.24.25. \" XIII. Trastevere 12. 13. 18. 19.\n\" VI. Parione 18. 19. 24.\n\" VII. Regola 18.19. 11 XIV. Borgo 23.24.\n\n(1} IAMB A TTISTA, or Giovan Battista Nolli was born at\nVJT Como, in Italy, about thebeginning of the eighteenth\ncentury. An architect by profession, he built the church of\nS. Dorotea in Roma, and in 1748 made a plan of that city,\nwhich was issued under the title of \" Nuova Pianta di Roma\nIt is a plan of the modern city with indications of the ancient\nruins, and was considered the finest which had been executed\nup to that time. Some years later, about 1755, he made another\nplan of ancient Roma.\nHe died in 1780, ten years after his son Carlo, who, a\npainter and engraver, predeceased him, in Naples where he\nhad gone to work for the King of Naples, in 1770.\n(2) r I AHERE are two Indexes in the original edition. We\n1 have not included the Alphabetical Index, thinking that\none Index would be enough for the moment. We have used\nthe two, and find the one i?icluded here to be the more useful\nof the two.\n*\nBUT we will give the Alphabetical Index in the next\nnumber of \" The Mask and those who wish can\nhine the whole work together."}, {"page_pdf": 8, "page_imprimee": "6", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.8", "texte": "INDEX OFNUMBERS ON THE PLAN.\nRIONE I. - MONTI.\n1. Chiesa di S. Stefano Rotondo T.C. 43\n2. Strada della Ferratella\n3. Ruine Antiche 44\n4. Abitazione de' PP. Penitenzieri di\nS. Gio. Laterano\n5. Cliiesa patriarc. e\" Paroc. di hS. Gio.\nLaterano\n6. Palaz Pontifieio ora Conservatorio di\nZitelle\n7. Cbiesa di S. Maria in Fonte\n8. Chiesa delle SS. Rufina, e Seconda\n9. Chiesa di S. Gio. in Fonte\n10. Obelisco gi& del Circo Massimo\n11. Sped, di S. Gio. per gli Uomini\n12. Cliiesa di S. Andrea unita al d. Sped.\n13. Sped, di S. Gio. per le Donne\n14. Obelisco Lodovisio giacente\n15. Sancta, Sanctorum e Scala santa\n16. Orat e Confrat del Sagramento in\nS. Gio. Laterano"}, {"page_pdf": 9, "page_imprimee": "7", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.9", "texte": "17' 'lieid(leLLxivU'0 linovato da N* S'\nBenedetto XIV\n• £a*P. f. Margarita\n19. Cap. di S. M. de Cisterciensi\n<20. Anfiteatro Castrense\n2L. Chiesa di S. Croce in Gernsalem T.C.\no0 t °? Cisterci Lombardi\n-2. lenipio di Venere, e Cupidine\n23. Strada Felice\n24. Terme di S. Elena\n25. Acquedotto di Claudio Imp.\n26. Tempio di Minerva Medina\n27. Chiesa di S. Bibiana\n28. Chiesa di S. Matteo in Merculana T.C.\ne conv. di Agostiniani Jrland.\n29. Chiesa di SS. Pietro? e Marcellino\nT. C. e Monast. de Maroniti di S. An-\ntnnin AW(,\n,,n /u,;!\" aJ pi t rT. n n\nChiesa di S. Clemente I. C. e Conven.\n\"e' Ibernesi\n31- Chiesa di S. Maria di Loreto, e Ospi-\nzio de Convalescenti\n32. Terme di Tito Imp."}, {"page_pdf": 10, "page_imprimee": "8", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.10", "texte": "33. Conserve d'acqua per d. Terme dette\nle sette sale\n34. Strada delle sette sale\n35. Palaz, e Villa Gaetani\n36. Chiesa di S. Giuliano, e Ospiz. dei\nCarmelit. della Provin. Romana\n37. R. A. d' volgarmente, i Trofei di\nMario\n38. Chiesa di S. Eusebio I. C. e Monast\nde' Celestini\n39. Ruin© credute della Villa di Meceuate\n40. Chiesa de' SS. Vito e Modesto D.C. e\nMonasterio de Cistercien. della Pro-\nvincia Romana\n41. Arco di Gallieno Imp.\n42. Chiesac'della Conceze e conservatorio\ndetto delle Viperesclie\n43. Memoria della Reconciliazione di En-\nrico IV\n44. Argine di Tarquinio\n45. Chiesa di S. Antonio Abate, e casa\nde' Canonici Reg. di d. Santo di Vien-\nna in Erancia\n46. Sped, di S. Antonio Abate\n47. Abitazione de' PP. Penitenzieri d.\nS. Maria Maggiore"}, {"page_pdf": 11, "page_imprimee": "9", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.11", "texte": "48. Colonna gia del Tempio della Pace\n49. Chiesa patriarc. di S. Mi Maggiore\n50. Obelisco gia del Mausol d'Ang.\n51. Palazzo Ciarnpini.\n52. Strada Paolina\n53. Palazzo Ravenna\n54. Strada dell' Olmo\n55. Palazzo Pocavena\n56. C. P. di S. Prassede T. 0. e Monast.\nde Vallombrosani\n57. Strada della Coroncina\n58. C. P. di S. Martino a' Monti T. C. e\nconv. de' Carroelitani con mine cre-\ndute delle Terme di Tito\n59. Chiesa di S. Lucia in selee e Monast.\ndi Agostiniane con R. A. e Torre\n60. Chiesa di S. M. della Purificazione e\nMonast di Monaclie di S. Chiara\ncon It. A,\n61. Cap. gia S. M. in Monasterio\n62. Monast. di Oblate di S. Francesco di\nPaola\n63. Yicolo di Monti Pollaeco\n64. Cbiesa di S. Pietro in Vincoli T. C. e"}, {"page_pdf": 12, "page_imprimee": "10", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.12", "texte": "Monasterio di Canonici Reg. di S. Sal*\nvatore\n65. C. P. di S. Franc, di Paola e conv.\nde' Minimi di Calabria con Tore\n66. Orat. e confr. di d. Santo\n67. Chiesa della concezion e Monast. di\ncappuccine dette Farnesiane\n68. Vicolo dell'Agnello d° Scelerato\n69. Vicolo del Cardello\n70. Chiesa di SS. Andrea Apost. e Ber-\nnardino de' Rigattieri\n71. Tempio creduto d' Isside e Serapide\n72 Chiesa di S. Francesca Romana e\nMonasterio d' Olivetani\n73. Arco di Tito Imp.\n74. Tempio della Pace\n75. Conservatorio delle Zitelle Mendicanti\ndel P. caravita\n76. Chiesa di S. Pantaleone a'Monti e\nconvitto di Preti Secolari\n77. Yicolo del Pozzolo"}, {"page_pdf": 13, "page_imprimee": "11", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.13", "texte": "78. Yicolo de'Pozzi\n79. Strada Alessandrina\n80. Ohiesa de SS. Cosmo, e Damiano D.C.\ne con. de' PP. del 3 ordine di S. Franc0\n81. Chiesa di S. Lorenzo in Miranda de'gli\nspeziali gi& Tempio d'Antoniuo, e\nFaustina\n82. Strada della salara vecchia\n83. Yicolo del Lauro\n84. Strada del Sole\n85. Avanzi del Foro Palladio, o di Xerva\n86. Torre di Conti\n87. Piazza delle Carrette\n88. Yicolo delle Pernicone\n89. C. P. de SS. Quirico, e G-iulitta T. C.\n©Ospizio de' Domenicani di S. Marco\ndi Firenze\n90. Orat. e Confr. del Sagramento in detta\nohiesa\n91. Strada di Torre de' eonti\n92. Chiesa di S. Agata de' Tessitori"}, {"page_pdf": 14, "page_imprimee": "12", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.14", "texte": "93. Strada della Croce Bianca\n94. Chiesa di S. Adriauo D. C. e conv.\nde' PP. della Mercede della prov.\nRoman a\n95. Orat. di S. M. del Riscatto degli\nAcqnavitari e Tabaccari\n96. Arco di Settimio Severo\n97. Chiesa de SS. Martina e Luca del-\nl'accademia de'Pittori\n98. Strada Bonella\n99. Strada del Priorato\n100. Palazzo Ghislieri\n101. Strada Creriiona, e Mannorella\n102. Strada delle Chiavi d'oro\n103. Chiesa di S. Urbano, e Monastero delle\nMonache Cappuccine\n104. Vicolo di Carbonari\n105. Palazzino Conti\n106. C. P. di S. Lorenzo a' Monti\n107. Strada di Testa Spaccata\n108. Strada di Marforio\n109. Palazzino Carandini\n110. Palazzino Mantica con sepolcro di\nCajo Pnblicio\n111. Luogo della Ripresa de' Barbari\n112. Piazza di' Marcel de' Corvi\n113. Piazza e colonna Trajana"}, {"page_pdf": 15, "page_imprimee": "13", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.15", "texte": "114. Chiesa delio Spirito Santo, e Mona-\nstero di Canonicliesse Lateranensi\n115. Chiesa di S. Enfemia, e Conserva-\nt.orio di Zitelle\n116. Vicolo de' Taroli\n117. Palazzi Cevra\n118. Salita di Monte Magnanapoli\n119. Ruine de' Bagni di Paolo\n120. Ospizio per le vedove\n121. C. P. di S- Min. Oampo Carleo\n122. Strada di Campo Carleo\n123. Chiesa dell' Annunziatn, e Monast.\ndi Donienicane nel Foro di ISTerva\n124. Arco di Pontani\n125. Yicolo degli Ibernesi\n120. Collegio degli Ibernesi\n127. Piazza del Grillo\n128. Palazzo del Grillo con Torre\n129. Salita del Grillo\n130. Chiesa di S. Caterina di Siena, e\nMonastero di Donienicane con Torre\n131. Chiesa di SS. Domenico, e Sisto, e\nMonastero di Domenieane della Pro-\nvincia di Lombardia"}, {"page_pdf": 16, "page_imprimee": "14", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.16", "texte": "132. Cbiesa di S. Bernardino, e Monast.\ndi Monacbe del 3 ordine di S. Franc0\n133. Collegio Faccioli\n134. Strada Bacciua\n135. C. P. di S. Salvatore, e Casa de' Ca-\ntecuraeni\n136. Orat. di S. Gio. Battista de' Neofiti\ne conservat. delle Neofiti\n137. Cliiesa di S. Maria de Monti e Col-\nlegio de Neofiti in cura de Pij Operari\n138. Orat. e Confr. di S M della Neve\n139. Strada Leonina\n140. Cliiesa di S. M. del Pasrolo, e Ospiz.\nde Monaci Basiliani Kuteni\n141. Strada de Serpen ti\n142. Strada delle Carrette\n143 Abitaze Stefanoni con Torre\n144. Vicolo del Sambuco"}, {"page_pdf": 17, "page_imprimee": "15", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.17", "texte": "145. Piazza de' Zingari\n146. Strada Clementina\n147. Yicolo di Cimarra\n148. Palazzo Passarini\n149. Palazzo Cimarra\n150. Yicolo di Ciancaleone\n151. Strada Paradisi\n152. Strada TTrbana\n153. Cliiesa di S. Lorenzo in Fonte e\nOspiz. TTrbano de' Coitegiani\n154. Piazza, e Strada della Suburra\n155. Ospiz. de Benfratelli Spagnnoli\n156. Strada Graziosa\n157. Cliiesa delPAnnunziata e Monast. di\nAgostiniane de le Turchine\n158. Monnst. delle Filippine\n159 Abitazione Cantarelli con Torre\n160. Salita di Sforza\n161. Vicolo di Buinaglia"}, {"page_pdf": 18, "page_imprimee": "16", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.18", "texte": "162. Chiesa del Bambino Gesu e convitto\ndi oblate Agostiniani\n163. Vicolo della Caprareccia\n164. Chiesa di S. Lorenzo in Pane, e\nPerna T. C. e Monast. di Monache\ndi S. Chiara con It. A.\n165. Torre nella Yigua di Monache\n166. Strada del Boscbetto\n167. Palazzino Corasoli\n168. Chiesa di S. Agata in Snburra D. C. e\nMonast. de'Monaci di Monte Yergine\n169. Palazzo Panfiii\n170. Palazzino Reali\n171. Vicolo de' Mazzarini\n172. Palazzo Pianetti\n173. Palazzo Rospigliosi\n174. Palazzo della Consulta\n175. Chiesa di S- M. Maddal. a Monte\nCavallo e Monast. di Domenicane\n176. Chiesa del Sagramento, e Monast.\ndi Cappuccine"}, {"page_pdf": 19, "page_imprimee": "17", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.19", "texte": "177. Chiesa di S. Andrea, e Eoviziato\nde Gesuiti\n178. Chiesa di S. Vitale unita a detto\nNoviziato\n179. Chiesa di S. Anna e S. Gioachino,\ne Ospiz. de' Carmelitani Scalzi\n180 Chiesa di S. Carlo, e Ospiz. de' Tri-\nnitari Scalzi Spagnuoli\n181. Quattro Eontane\n182. Chiesa di S. Dionisio, e conv. de\nTrinitari Scalzi Francesi\n183. Strada di S. Vitale\n184. Palazzino dell' Emo Albani S. Cleme\n185. Chiesa di S. Paolo p. Eremita e Ospiz\ndi Eremiti TJngari di d° Santo\n186. Chiesa di S. M. della Sanity, ©\nS. Efrem, e Ospiz. per Siriaci\n187. Palazzino dell' Emo Alessandro Al-\nbani\n188. Cliiesa di S. Pudenziana T. C. e\nMonast. de Cistercien. Riforni; di\nS. Bernardino con R. A."}, {"page_pdf": 20, "page_imprimee": "18", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.20", "texte": "189. Chiesa di S. Norberto. e Collegio de\nMonaci Preraostrateusi\n190. Palazzo Albani\n191. Chiesa di S. Teresa, e Monast. di\nCarmelitane Scalze\n192. Cbiesa dell' Incarnazione e Monast,\n> dell© Carmelit di S. M. Maddalena\nde' Pazzi de le Barberine\n193. Cbiesa di S. Caionnita al d° Monnst.\n194. Ospiz. di Ermiti Camaldolesi To-\nscani\n195. Chiesa di S. Bernardo T. C , e Mo-\nnast. di Cistercien Pi form. cli d.\nSanto\n19G. Orat. di S. Caterina unita alia Sudetla\n197. Granari Pubblici\n198. Piazza di Termine\n199. Palaz, © Villa Negroni gia Montaltq"}, {"page_pdf": 21, "page_imprimee": "19", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.21", "texte": "200. Conserve <1 Vienna delle Tonne Dio-\ncleziane \"\n201. Luogo dove si seppelliscono i x>r°te-\nstanti\n202. Castro Pretorio\n203. Chiesa di S. M. degli Angeli T. C, e\nMonast. de' Certosini nolle Terme\nDioeleziane\n204. Granari pubblici\n205. Fontana dell'acqua Felice\nRIONE II, - TREYI.\n206. C. P. di Susanna T. C. e Mouastero\ndi Monaehe Cisterci"}, {"page_pdf": 22, "page_imprimee": "20", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.22", "texte": "207. Cliiesa di S. Maria del la Vittoria e\nconv : de' Carmelit Scalzi Italiani\n208. Tempio detto <1 i Venere\n209. Avanzi del Circo do di Flora\n210. Yicolo del Falcone\n211. Chiesadi S. Nicolb di Tolentino e coil-\nvento di Agostiniani Scalze con Torre\n212. Vicolo della Colonna\n213. Cliiesa di S. Basilio, e Monastero\ndi Basiliani Italo-Greci\n214. Piazza Barberina gia Sforza e Gr;-\nman a\n215. Palazzo Barberini con Guglia gia-\ncente nel Cortile\n216. Palazzo Barberini per la famiglia"}, {"page_pdf": 23, "page_imprimee": "21", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.23", "texte": "217. Palazzino Galloppi\n218. Chiesa di S. Andrea e Collegio Scoz-\nzese\n219. Palazzo Grimani\n220. Strada Rasella\n221. Cliiesa di S. Maria della Neve e\nOspiz. de Cistercien. Risorm. Fuliensi\n222. Yicolo degli Avignonesi\n223. Yicolo della Palma\n224. CP di S. Nicolo in Arcione, e\nOspiz. de' Servi di Maria\n225. Orat, del bmo Crocif. agonizante"}, {"page_pdf": 24, "page_imprimee": "22", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.24", "texte": "della Confr. del Sagramt0 di detta\nChiesa\n226. Palazzo dell' Emo Gentili\n227. Vicolo de Gallinaccio\n228. Chiesa di S. Gio. e Colleg de' Ma-\nroniti\n229. Strada de Maroniti\n230. Palazzo del Emo Alberoni\n231. Cliiesa e Confr. de SS. Angeli Cu-\nstodi\n232. Palazzo Panfili\n233. Acquedotto delPacqna Vergine\n234. Palazzo Bufalo\n235. Strada della Cliiavica del Bufalo\n236. Cliiesa di S. Claudio de Borgoguoni\n237. Yicolo del Merangolo\n238. C. P. di S. M. in Via T. C. e conv,\nde' Servi di Maria"}, {"page_pdf": 25, "page_imprimee": "23", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.25", "texte": "239. Orat. e Confr. del Sagr. ind. Chiesa\n240. Piazza di Poli\n241. Palazzo Conti\n242. 0. P. di S. M. in Trivio, e casa de\nMinistri degli Infermi\n243. Fontana di Trevi e sua Piazza\n244 Palazzo Cavalieri\n245. S trad a Kuova\n246. Piazza © Vicolo di Scanderbecli\n247. C. P. de' SS. Vincenzo ed Anastasio,\ne Casa de' Chierici Minori\n248. Yicolo del Babuccio\n249. Dataria Apostolica, e Eesidenza del\nDatario\n250. Palazzo Pontificio nel Quirinale\n251. Orat. del Beato Nicold de' Rnpe\nnella Guardia de' Svizzeri\n252. Piazza di Monte Cavallo con Font."}, {"page_pdf": 26, "page_imprimee": "24", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.26", "texte": "253. Quartieri per la Guardia Reale\n254. Scuderia Pontificia\n255. Abitazione per la Famiglia Pontif.\n256. Chiesa di S. Croce, e Bonaventura\nde' Lncchesi con Spedale\n257. Palazzo Testa Piccolomini\n258. Palazzo e Giardino del Contestable\nColonna con R. A.\n259. Chiesa di S. Silvestro, e Noviziato\nde' Teatini\n360. Palazzo Vidman, e Ospizio de' Ve-\nscovi Yeneti\n201. Palazzo Florenzi\n262. Palazzo Molara\n263. Piazza delle 3 Cannelle, e Fontana\n264. Palazzino Stella\n265. Abitazione della Famiglia di Casa\n( olonna con Torre\n266. Palazzo Grassi\n267. S. M. del Carmine Orat della Confr.\naggregata alia Cliiesa di S. Marti no\na' Monti\n268. Vicolo de' Colonnesi con Arco\n269. Palazzo Cigolini"}, {"page_pdf": 27, "page_imprimee": "25", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.27", "texte": "270. Palazzo Scarlatti\n271. Palazzo Papi\n272. Chiesa e confr. del Nome di Maria\n278. Palazzo Bonelli\n274. Cliiesa di'S. M. di Loreto dell' Uni-\nversity de' Fornari Italiani\n275. Spedale dell' universita snd.a\n276. Palazzo Parracciani\n277. Palazzo Bolognetti\n278. Cliiesa di S, Romnaldo, e Ospizio\nde' Camaldolesi\n279. Palazzo Altemps Isimbardi S, Casa\ndi Lore to\n280. Vicolo del Piombo\n281. Palazzo e Giardino Colonna\n282. Strada della Pilotta con due Ar-\nchi\n283. C. P. de' S.S. XII Apostoli T. C. e\nconv. de'Minimi Conventuali\n284. Palazzo Odescalco\n285. Palazzo dell'Accademia di Francia"}, {"page_pdf": 28, "page_imprimee": "26", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.28", "texte": "286. C. P. di S. Marcello T. C, e Con-\nvento de' Serviti\n287. Orat. © Conf. del Crocif. in d. Chiesa\n28S. Palazzo Millini\n289. Palazzo Muti Papazzurri\n290. Palazzino della Comp. de'SS. XII\nApostoli\n291. Strada del Umilta\n292. Palazzo Mnti Papazzurri\n393. Piazza della I'ilotta\n294. Palazzo Ciogni\n295. Palazzo Grimaldi\n296. Chiesa di S. M. dell' Uroilta, © Mo-\nnastero di Domenicane\n297. Palazzo Maccarani\n298 Strada dell© Vergini\n299. Chiesa di S. M. dell© Vergini, e Mo-\nnastero di Agostinian©\n300. Palazzo Colonna di Carbognano\n301. Strada dell© Mnratte\n302. Piazza di Sciarra, © Arco di Carbo-\ngnano\nElOKE III. - COLONEA.\n303. Palazzo dell' Ereditk Lanci\n304. Ospiz. di S. Croc© de' Monaci Ci-\nstercien di Lombardia\n305. Piazza Rosa"}, {"page_pdf": 29, "page_imprimee": "27", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.29", "texte": "306. Palazzo Spada\n307. Yicolo del Pozzo\n308. Yicolo di Cacciabove\n309. Palazzo Ghigi\nColonna di Marco Aurelio, e Piazza\ndetta Colonna\n311. Palazzo dell' Ospizio Apostolico Abi-\ntazione di Monsig Yicegevente\n312. Palazzo della Casa degii Or fan i\n313. Palazzo del Cinque\n314. Palazzo delle Monaclie Agostiniane\ndella Terra di Calvi\n315. Piazza di Pietra\n316. Chiesa de SS* Bartolomeo e Alessan-\ndro e Sped, de Bergamaschi, e Colleg.\nCerasoli\n317. Palazzo Niccoliui\n318. Palazzo Guelfi Camaiani Montauti e\nKovarelli\n319. Yicolo dell'Archetto\n320. Palazzo Montecatini\n321. Palazzo di S. Giac. degli Incurabili\n322. Dogana di Terra con Colonue An-\ntiche\n323. Cliiesa di S. Mauto\n324. Seminario Komano"}, {"page_pdf": 30, "page_imprimee": "28", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.30", "texte": "ooc Palazzo Serlupi\n326. Vicolo de* Pastini\n327. Vicolo della Spada d'Orlando\n328 Palazzo della Confr. del Rosario con\ndue Colonne Antiche nel Cortile\n329. Piazza Capranica\n330 CP di S. M. in Aquiro D. C. e Col-\n' legio'Salviati e casa degli Orfani\n331. TEATRO CAPRANICA\n332. Teatro Cap-ranica\n333. Collegio Capranica\n334. Chiesa di S. M. Maddalena, e Casa\nde' Ministri degli Infermi\n335. Vicolo delle Colonuelle\n336. Palazzo delle Monac. di Campo Marzo\n337. Strada di Monte Citorio\n338. Piazza di Monte Citorio, e Piedestallo\ndella Colonna Antonina\n339. Palazzo dell'Ospiz. Apostolico d('\nl,a Curia Innocenziana\n340. Colonna Antonina giaoente\n341. Chieaa della Sma J riuitit, e Casa\nde Missionary\n342. Palazzo Mariscotti\n243. Palazzo Rondinini\n344. Palazzo Conti con Obehsco Solare\ngiacente"}, {"page_pdf": 31, "page_imprimee": "29", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.31", "texte": "345. Palazzo Paiorabara\n346. Palazzo Yerospi\n347. Palazzo Teodoli\n348. Palazzo Grhigi per la famiglia\n319. Palazzo Magnani\n350. C. P. di S. Lorenzo in Lucina T. C.\ne Casa di Chierici Minori\n351. Palazzo Ottoboni con Torre\n352. Palazzo Araadori Prelatura\n353. Sito dell'Arco di Marco Aurelio gi^t\nd° di Portogallo\n351. Strada del Gambaro\n355. Palazzo Raggi\n356. Chiesa diS. M. Maddalena e Monast.\ndi Agostiniane dette le Convertite\n357. Chiesa di S. Silvestco in Capite T* C.\ne Monast. di monache di S. Chiara\n358. Strada della Vite\n359. Strada Frattina\n360. Strada del Moretto\n361. Chiesa di S. Grio. e Ospiz de'P.P,\ndella Mercede Scalzi Spagnuoli\n362. Palazzi Bernini\n363. Palazzo Olgiati\n361. Chiesa de' SS. Re' Magi, e Collegio\nTJrbano di Propaganda Fide"}, {"page_pdf": 32, "page_imprimee": "30", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.32", "texte": "365. C. P. di S. Andrea delle Fratte, e\nConvento de'Minimi\n366. S.S. Andrea Apost. e Franc, di Paola\norat della confr. del Sagramento in\nd. Chiesa\n367. Collegio Nazzareno\n368. Palazzi de'Angelis\n369. Piazza de' due Macelli\n370. Strada Paolina\n371. Yicolo de Zucchelli\n372. Cbiesa di S. M. dell'Idria detta di\nCostantinopoli de' Siciliani\n373. Chiesa di S. Giuseppe a' Capole\nCase e Monastero di Teresiane\n374. Chiesa de SS. Iddfonso, e Tomaso\ndi Villanova, e Ospiz. di AgGstiniani\nScalzi Spagnuoli\n375. Chiesa di S. Francesca Bomana e\nconvento di Trinitari Italiani\n376. Orat. dell'Assunta della Confr. del\nSagram. di S. Susanna\n377. Ospiz. di Benedettini Spagnuoli\n378. Palazzino Perucclii\n379. Strada della Purificazione\n380. Chiesa della Sma concezione, e\nconvento de' Cappuccini\n381. Palazzo Lucatelli\n382. Palazzo e Yilla Ludovisi\n383. Strada Salara\n384. Chiesa di S. Isidoro e Collegio de'\nMin Osservanti Irlandesi\n385. Palazzo Guarnieri\no BIONE IY. - CAMPO MABZO. o\n386. Palazzo Tomati\n387. Strada Gregoriana\n388. Piazza Mignanelli\n38th Palazzi Mignanelli\n390. Palazzo Zuccari, Nazari Comp. della\nNunziata\n391. Chiesa della Trinita de'Monte T. C.\ne Convento de' Minimi Francesi\n392. Palazzo, e Villa Medici\n393. Obolisco in detta Yilla\n394. Cap. di S. Gaetano in da Yilla\n395. Piazza di Spagna\n396. TEATBO DETTO D'ALIBEBT\n397. Strada Margntta\n398. Palazzo Boncompagni\n399. Fontana, e Strada del Babuino\n400. Vicolo del Borghetto\n401. Chiesa P. di S. M del Popolo T. C.\ne conv. di Agostiniani Lombardi\n402. I uogo dove si sepelliscono gP Impe-\nnitenti e Muro Tor to\n403. Piazza del Popolo con Fontana, e\nObelisco gi& del Circo Massimo\n404. Cbiesa di S. M. di Monte Santo, e\nconvento di Carmelitani Biformati\n405. Strada Laurina\n406. Strada Orsini\n407. Cbiesa di Gesu, e Maria, e Convento\nd'Agostiniani Scalzi\n408. Oratorio e Confr. di Gesu, Me Giu-\nseppe\n409. Chiesa di S. Atanasio de' Greci\n410. Arco, e Strada de' Greci\n411. Collegio Greco\n412. Cbiesa di S. Orsola, e Monastero di\nAgostiniane dette le Orsoline\n413. Strada Yittoria\n414. Strada de' Sediari\n415. Palazzo Gomez\n416. Strada della Croce\n417. Strada delle Carozze\n418. Palazzo della Beligione di Malta\n419. Palazzo della Porta\n420. Strada della Serena\n421. Palazzo della Trinita de' Pellegrini\n422. Strada Condotti\n423. Cbiesa della Trinita e ospizio de'\nTrinitari Castigliani\n424. Oratorio e Conf. del Sagramento in\nS. Lorenzo in Lncina\n425. Palazzo Avogadri\n426. Palazzo Nunez\n427. Palazzo Maruscelli\n428. Strada Porgognona\n429. Palazzo di Spagna\n430. Strada di Boccaleone\n431. Yicolo del Gambaro\n432. Palazzo Manfroni\n433. Strada del Corso\n434. Palazzo Buspoli\n435. Strada del Leoncino\n436. Piazza della Torretta\n437. Palazzo della S. Casa de' Loreto\n438. Piazza di Campo Marzo\n439. Palazzo Valdina Cremona\n440. Cbiesa di S. M. in Campo Marzo e\nMonast. di Benedettine, con 2 chiese\ninteriori di S. Maria, e di S. Grego-\nrio Nazzinzeno\n441. Strada di Campo Marzo\n442. Piazza di Firenze\n443. Yicolo di Ascanio\n444. TEATBODELLAPALLACCOBDA\n445. Palazzo Cardelli\n446. Palazzo'di Firenze\n447. C. P. di S. Nicolb de' Perfetti e\nospizio di Domenicani di S. Sabina\n448. Oratorio e Confr. del Sagramento e\nS. Catarina di Siena in da. Cbiesa\n449. Yicolo della Lupa\n450. Cbiesa di SS. Biagio, e Cecilia de'\nMaterassari\n451. Palazzo Borghese\n452. Piazza Borghese\n453. Palazzo Borghese per la Famiglia\n454. Vicolo del Merangolo\n455. Piazza di Monte d'Oro\n456. Ospizio de' Liegesi\n457. Palazzino Quarantotto\n458. Strada del Macello\n459. ChiesaColleg: di S. GirolamodeSchia-\nvoni T. C. con Spedale per Nazionali\n460. Strada del Grottino\n461. Cbiesa di S. Ambrogio, e S. Carlo\ndi Milanesi con Spedale\n462. Oratorio e Confr. de' Milanesi\n463. Strada di Schiavoni\n464. Piazza delle Carrette\n465. Piazza degli Otto Cantoni\n466. Strada, e vicolo delle Colonnelle\n467. Yicolo della Pergola\n468. Chiesa e Confr. di S. Bocco\n469. Oratorio sotto la detta Invocazione\n470. Spedale per gli Uomini\n471. Spedale per le donne partorienti\n472. Maus. di Augusto, e Palazzo Correa\n473. Strada de' Pontefici\n474. Yicolo della Frezza\n475. Palazzo Minucci\n476. Chiesa di S. Giacomo degl'Incurabili\n477. Spedale per le donne\n478. Spedale per gli Domini\n479. Chiesa di S. M. Porta Paradisi\n480. Sped, dismesso di S. Giacomo sud.\n481. Palazzo di S. Giacomo sudetto\n482. Yicolo del Yantaggio\n483. Palazzo Bondinini\n484 Chiesa di S. M. de' Miracoli de\nPP. del 3 ordine Biformati di S. Fran-\ncesco Francesi\n485. Yicolo dell'Inferno\n486. Piazza de' Miracoli\n487. Yicolo de' Miracoli\n488. Piazza dell' Oca\n489. Yicolo della Penna\n490. Yicolo delle Scalette\n491. Palazzo Cardelli gia Capponi\n492. Cbiesa di S. M. della providdenza, e\nconserv. di zitelle a Bipetta\n493. Dogana di Bipetta\n494. Strada e Porto di Bipetta\n495. Cbiesa di S. Gregorio dell'Universit&\nde' Muratori\n496. Oratorio di d°. Santo della da. Dni-\nversita\n497. Strada Leccosa\n498. Palazzo de' Aste de' Genova\n499. Collegio Clemeutino\n500. Torre del detto Collegio\n501. Piazza Nicosia\n502. Palazzo Negroni\n503. Palazzo Celesi ora Negroni\n504. C. P. di S. Ivo de' Britanni\n505. Yicolo della Campana\n506. Chiesa di S. Antonio di Padova de'\nPortoghesi con conv. di Preti © Spe.\n507. Vicolo del Leoncino\n508. C, P. © Colleg. di S. Lucia della Tinta\n509. Strada di Mont© Brianzo\no RIO N E V . - PONTE o\n510. Palazzo de* Romanis\n511. Palazzo Carafa Prelatura\n512. Palazzo della confr. del Confalone\ncon Torre\n513. Yicolo della Palombella\n514. Strada de' Gigli d' Oro\n515. Cliiesa di S. Apollinare e Collegio\nGermanico Ungarico\n516. Arco detto di S. Agostino\n517. Piazza Palomba\n518. Torre Sanguigna in Casa Conti\n519. Palazzo Altemps con cap. Insigne di\nS. Aniceto Papa e Martire\n520. Yicolo de' Soldati\n521. Palazzo Gottifredi\n522. C. P. di S. M. in Posterula e Mo-\nnastero di Celestini\n523. Arco detto di Parma\n524. Strada dell'Orso\n525. C. P. di Simon© Profeta\n526. Palazzo Cesi\n527. Strada della Maschera d'Oro\n528. Strada Gaetana\n529. Palazzo Sacripanti\n530. Piazza Fiammetta\n531. Palazzo Sampieri\n532. Cbiesa di S. Trifone\n533. Palazzo Lancellotti\n534. Yicolo de' Matriciani\n535. Chiesa di S. Salvatorein Lauro della\nNazione Picena, e 2 collegi annessi\n536. TEA TP O DI TOR DI NO NA.\n537. Yicolo di Yeccbiarelli\n538. Yicolo della Palma\n539. Confortaria pei condannati a morte\n540. Palazzo Altoviti\n541. Yestigie del Ponte Trionfale\n542. Yicolo dell'Agnello\n543. Yicolo del Grancio\n544. Strada di S. Gio. de' Fiorentini\n545. Yicolo delle Telline\n546. Palazzo Lavaiani\n547. Palazzo Niecolini\n548. Piazza del Agnello\n549. C. P. di Gio. de' Fiorentini con Spe-\ndali pei Nazionali\n550. Oratorio di S. Orsola detto il coti-\nsolato.\n551. Yicolo dell'Oro\n552. Palazzo de Rossi\n553. Cbiesa di S. M. della Purificazione\nde' Transalpini\n554. Yicolo de' Cimatori\n555. Collegio di Bandinelle\n556. Yicolo delle Palle\n557. Palazzo Saccbetti\n558. C. P. di S. Biagio della Pagnotta\n559. Cbiesa de SS. Faustino e Giovita\ndetta ancora di S. Anna de Bresciani\n560. Chiesa e Confr. di S. M. del Suffragio\n561. Oratorio annesso a detta Cbiesa\n562. Oratorio e Confr. del Confalone con\nChiesa sotterranea di S. Lucia\n563. Yicolo della Scimia\n564. Strada Giulia\n565. Cbiesa di S. Elisabetta della TJni-\nversitk de' Mendicanti Invalidi\n566. Strada di Bancbi vecchi.\n567. Palazzo del Nero\n568. Piazza di Sforza\n569. Palazzo Sforza e Cesarini\n570. Palazzo Spada\n571. Vicolo del Pavone\n572. Banco di S. Spirito\n573. Strada de' Bancbi, con 2 fontane\n574. Palazzo Cicciaporci\n575. C. P. e collegio de' SS. Gelso e Giu-\n1 ano\n576. Oratorio e Confr. del Sagr in detta\nChiesa\n577. Strada di Panico"}, {"page_pdf": 33, "page_imprimee": "31", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.33", "texte": "578. Chiesa e Confr. di S. Giuliano\n579. Palazzo Cappoui di Firenze\n580. Palazzo Camerata\n581. Piazza di Monte Giordano con Fontana\n582. Palazzo Gabrielli\n583. Vicolo della Gatta\n584. Casa di Rafaelle d'Urbino.\n585. Strada de Coronari\n586. C. P. de' SS. Simone, e Giuda\n587. Palazzo Tanara\n588. Strada della PaJlaccorda al Fico\n589. Piazza del Avila\n590. Vicolo del Coralio\n591. Piazza del Fico\n592. Chiesa di S Biagio della Fossa del-\n1'university degli Osti\n593. Palazzo Sala\n594. Palazzo del Drago\n595. Palazzo del Antico Monte di Piety\n596. Palazzo Bonaventura\n597. Piazza della Pace\n598. Palazzo di S. M. dell'Anima\n599. C. P. di S. M. della Pace T. C. e\nMonastero de' Canonici Lateranensi\n600. Chiesa di S. M. dell'Anima della\nNazione Teutonica con couvitto de'\nPreti ed Ospizio\n601. Yicolo della Yolpe\n602. Yicolo del Sole\no it I ONE VI. - PARIONE o\n603. Chiesa di S. Nicolb de* Lorenesi\n604. Palazzo Ornani\n605. Piazza Navona con 3 Fontane e Obe-\nlisco del circo di Caracalla\n606. Chiesa di S. Giacoino de* Spagnuoli\ncon convitto de* Preti e Spedale de*\nCastiglioni\n607. Palazzo Panfili\n608. Chiesa di S. Agnese e Palaz. Panfili\n609. Palazzo Maculani\n610. Torre Millina\n611. TEATRO DELLA PACE\n612. Strada della Pace\n613. Collegio Nardini\n614. Palazzo della comp. di Sancta Sanc-\ntorum Residenza del Governatore\ndi Roma\n615. C. P. di S. Tomaso in Parione T. C.\n616. Palazzo Galli e Colloretti\n617. Vicolo de' Granari\n618. TEATR'O DE' GRANARI\n619. Chiesa e Conf. della Nativity di N.\nS. G. C. detta degli Agonizanti\n620. Piazza di Pasquino\n621. Palazzo Caraccioli P. di Santobuono\n622. Vicolo della Cuccagna\n623. Palazzo Lancellotti\n624. Chiesa di S. Pantaleone, e casa de'\nPP. delle scuole pei scuole pubbliche\n625. Palazzi Massimi\n626. Palazzo della Compag. de' SS. XII\nApostoli\n627. Palazzo Trulli\n628. Strada del Paradiso\n629. Palazzo Manfroni\n630. Piazza del Paradiso\n631. Chiesa di S. Elisabetta del univer-\nsity dei Garzoni Tedesclii de Fornare\ncon Spedale\n632. Strada de' Chiavari\n633. Piazza de' Satiri\n634. Chiesa di S. Barbara dell'Univ. de'\nLibrari\n635. C. P di S. M. di Grotta Pinta\n636. Palazzo Pio coil ruine del Teatro di\nPompeo\n637. Piazza del Biscione\n638. Piazza di Campo di Fiore con Fontana\n639. Piazza Pollaroli\n640. Strada de' Baullari\n641. Yicolo dell'Acquila\n642. Palazzo Galli\n643. Palazzo Bonardi\n644. Yicolo do Leutari\n645. Chiesa colleg. insigne, e P. di S. Lo-\nrenzo in Damaso\n646. Orat. e Confr. del Sagr. in d. Chiesa\n647. Cancelleria Apostolica\n648. Piazza, e Vicolo de' Cimatori\n649. Strada del Pellegrino\n650. Vicolo di Savelli\n651. Palazzo Buoncompagni con Torre\n652. Piazza di Sovra\n653. Strada di Panone\n654. Vicolo del Governo\n655. Palazzo Gaucei\n656. Chiesa di S. M. in Vallicella, e Casa\nde' P. P. della Congregazione del-\n1'Oratorio\n657. Orat. dell'Assunta e S. Cecilia de'\ndetti Padri\n658. Yicolo dei Cartari\n659. Yicolo di Calabraga\n660. C. P. di S. Stefano in Piscinnla\nRIONE VII, - REGOLA\n661. Chiesa di S. Luc. della Confrat. del\nConfalone con convit. di Preti Se-\ncolari\n662. Carceri Nuove\n663. Piazza Padella\n604. C. P. di S. Nicolb degli Incoronati\n665. Palazzo Mancini\n666. Chiesa di S. Filippo Neri\n667. Oratorio e Congr. delle Piaghe di\nGesii Cristo\n668. Piazza della Chiavica di S. Lucia\n669. Yicolo della Moretta\n670. Palazzo Bossi\n671. Palazzo Incoronati\n672. Palazzo de' Aste\n673. Palazzo Orsini\n674. Palazzo Rocci ora Spada\n675. Piazza di Ricci\n676. Yicolo dello Struzzo\n677. Collegio Ghislieri\n678. Chiesa dello Spirito S. de' Napolitani\n679. Orat. e Confr. de' medesimi\n680. Palazzo Ricci\n681. C. P. di S. Gio. in Ayno\n682. Strada di Monserrato\n683. Palazzo Pannini\n684. Palazzo Capponi di Firenze ,\n685. Yicolo de' Cappellari\n686. Palazzo Ghigi Montorio\n687. Vicolo di Montorio\n688. Chiesa di S M. di Monserrato degli\nAragonesi con Sped.\n689. Yicolo della Lunetta\n690. Chiesa di S. Eligio degli Orefici\n691. Strada dell'Armata\n692. Palazzo degli Atti\n693. Palazzo Falconieri\n694. Palazzo Falconiere\n695. Chiesa di S. Caterina de' Sanesi\n696. Palazzo Baldocci\n697. Chiesa di S. Tomaso Cantuariense\ne Collegio degl'Inglesi\n698. Palazzo del collegio Inglese\n699. Chiesa e Casa di S. Brigida dell'or-\ndine del Siho Salvatore\n700. Palazzo Fioravante\n701. Chiesa di S. Girolamo della Comp.\ndella Carity, e Casa per i Preti del-\nl'Oratorio\n702. C. P. di S. Caterina della Rota\n703. Chiesa e Confr. di S. M. dell' Ora-\nzione detta della Morte.\n704. Fontana detta il Mascherone di Far-\nnese\n705. Palazzo Farnese con Arco sopra\nStrada Giulia\n706. Piazza Farnese con due Fontane\n707. Yicolo del Gallo\n708. Palazzo Pighini\n709. Palazzo Mandosi\n710. Chiesa di S. M. della Quercia del-\n1'University de' Macellari\n711. Yicolo de' Yenti\n712. Palazzo di Cavalieri dell' Ordine Teu-\ntonico\n713. Chiesa de' SS. Gio. Apost. e Petro-\nnio de' Bolognese\n714. Strada della Catena\n715. Palazzo Spada\n716. Palazzo Spada gia Campo di Ferro\n717. Strada e Vicolo di Capo di Ferro\n718. Piazza di Spada\n719. Yicolo de' Batestrari\n720. Vicolo delle Grotte\n721. Strada di Giupponari\n722. Chiesa di SS. Teresa, e Gio. della\nCroce, e Ospiz. de Carmelitani Scaizi\n723. Chiesa di S. Marti no gia della Confr.\ndella Dottrina Cristiana\n724. Piazza di Monte di Pieta\n725. Cap. di S. M., e Sacro Monte di Piety\n726. Chiesa della Trinity, e Ospizio de*\nPellegrini, e Convalescenti\n727. Oratorio e confr. di detta Chiesa\n728. Strada de' Pettinari\n729. Palazzo Cacoia\n730. C. P. di S.Salvatore in Onda e Ospiz.\nde' Min. Conventuali\n731. Chiesa diS. Franc, d' Assisi, e Colleg.\nEcclesiastico, e Sped, pei Sacerdoti\n732. Ponte Gianicolo ora Ponte Sisto\n733. Conserv. de' SS. Clemente, e Cre-\nsceutino per Zitelie dettele Zoocolette\n734. Chiesa di S. Paolo Apost., e Conv.\nde' P.P. del 3 ordine di S. Francesco\nSiciliani\n735. Oratorio di S. Giacomo Apost. de'\nCappellari\n736. Piazza degli Specchi\n737. C. P. de' S. M. in Monticelli e Casa\nde' PP. della Dottrina Cristiana Avi-\ngnonesi\n738. C. P. di S. Salvat. in Campo\n739. Palazzo Alibrandi\n740. Palazzo Santa Croce\n741. Palazzo S. Croce per la Famiglia\n742. Piazza di Branca\n743. Palazzo di Signoribus\n744. Yicolo de' Sediari\n745. Strada della Regola\n746. Chiesa P. de. S.S. Vincenzo e Ana-\nstasio della Comp. di Cuochi\n747. Yicolo del Merangolo\n748. Chiesa di S. Bartolomeo de' Vaccinari\n749. Piazza de' Cenci\n750. Palazzi Cenci con due Archi\n751. C, P. di S. Tomaso a Cenci\n752. Yicolo de' Cenci\n753. Chiesa di Maria del Pi an to della\nConfr. della Dottr. Cristiana\n754. Oratorio della confr. suddetta\n755. Chiesa di S. Maria in Cacaberio de'\nCocchieri\n756. Avanzi d'un Antico Portico\nRIONE VIII. - S. EUTTACHIO\n757. C. P. di S. Maria in Publicolis\n758. Strada del Falegname\n759. C P. di S. Carlo, a Catinari e casa\ndi Bernabiti\n760. Palazzo Jacobelli\n761. Piazza del Monte della Farina\n762. Strada del Monte della Farina\n763. Chiesa di S. Anna, e Monastero de1\nBenedettine\n764. Chiesa di S. Elena de' Credenzieri\n765. Palazzo Cavalieri\n766. Palazzo Cavalierini\n767. Strada Argentina\n768. Chiesa de' SS. Cosimo, e Damiano de*\nBarbieri\n769. Oratorio de' medesimi Santi de' detti\nBarbieri\n770. Strada de' Cesarini\n771. TEATRO D'ARGENTINA\n772. Chiesa di S. Giuliano de' Fiammin-\nghi con Sped, pei Nazionali\n773. Torre Argentina nelle Case di Ce-\nsarini\n774. Chiesa dei Sudario de' Piernontesi\n775. Chiesa di S. Andrea della Valle, e\ncasa de' Teatini\n776. Vicolo deli'Abate Luigi\n777. Palazzo Coltrolini\n778. Palazzo Alberini\n779. Strada della Yalle\n780. Palazzo Couti"}, {"page_pdf": 34, "page_imprimee": "32", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.34", "texte": "781. Palazzo Pescatori\n782. Palazzi del Bufalo\n783. Piazza della Valle\n784. Cbiesa P. di S. M. in Monterone, e\nConvit. de' P.P. della Mercede Scalzi\nI tali an i\n785. Arco Moderno della Ciambella\n786. Cbiesa di S. Benedetto e Scolastica\nde' Xorcini\n787. Palazzi Sinibaldi\n788. Vicolo di Nari\n789. Palazzo Nari\n790. Strada della Palombella\n791. Piazza de' Caprettari\n792. Palazzo Cenci\n793. Palazzo Lanti\n794. Palazzo Capranica\n795. TEATRO DELLA VALLE\n796. Vicolo del Melone\n797. Strada de' Sediari, e Taccari\n798. Strada de' Canestrari, o della Catena\ndella Sapienza\n799. Universita e Scuole pubbliche dette\nla Sapienza\n800. Chiesa di S. Tvo nella Sapienza\n801. Piazza di S. Eustachio\n802. Chiesa Coll e paroc. di d Santo D. C.\n803. Vicolo dell'Albergo de' Marcbegiani\n804. Palazzo Carpegna\n805. Piazza Madama\n806. Palazzo Medici detto di Madama con\nruine delle Terme Alessandrine\n807. Chiesa di S. Salvatore in Thermis\n808. C. P. di S. Luigi de Francesi\n809. Convit. di Preti, e Sped, dei Nazi.\n810. Vicolo de' Matriciani\n811. Piazza Lombarda\n812. Strada delle Cinque Lune\n813. Strada del Pinaco\n814. Palazzo del Collegio Germanico Un-\ngarico\n815. Collegio Germanico Ungarico\n816. C. P. di S. Agostino T. C. e Conv.\ndegli Agostiniani\n817. Fontanella, e strada della Scrofa\n818. Palazzo Casali\n819. Vicolo de' Spagnuoli\n820. Vicolo della Vaccarella\n821. Palazzo della Compagnia di Saneta\nSanctorum\n822. Palazzo Palma con Torre\n823. Palazzo Nari\n824. Palazzo Rita\n825. C. P. di S. Salvatore delle Cappelle\n826. Palazzo Accoramboni\n827. Piazza del Pozzo delle Cornaccbie\n828. Palazzo di S. Giacomo de Spagnuoli\n829. Palazzo Patrizi\n830. Piazza Rondinina\n831. Palazzo Borghese\n832. Palazzo Giustiniani\n833. Avanzi di un antico Portico\n834. Piazza della Rotonda con fontana e\nGuvlia\n835. Palazzo Crescenzi\n836. Palazzo Melchiorri\no RIONE IX. - PIGNA o\n837. Cbiesa Colleg. e paroc. di S. Maria\nad Marty res detta la Rotonda D. C.\ngia Pantheon\n838. Orat. e Confr. del Sagr, in d. Chiesa\n839. Palazzino Corsini Palombara\n840. Accademia Ecclesiastica\n841 Cap. di S. Caterina da Siena dentro\nla Casa della Comp. della Nunziata\n842. Piazza della Minerva con' Elefante,\ne Guglia\n843. Palazzo de' Domenicani della Mi-\nnerva\n844. C. P. di S. Maria Sopra Minervg T.\nC., e conv. de' Domenicani\n845. Strada di Pie di Marmo\n846. Piazza del Collegio Romano\n847. Cbiesa di S. Tgnazio Collegio de' Ge-\nsniti, e Scuole pubbliche dette il\nCollegio Romano\n848. Orat. di S. Maria della Piet& detto\ndel P. Caravita con Arco\n849. Palazzo de' Carolis\n850. Fontana del Facchino\n851. Cbiesa colleg. e P. di S. Maria in\nVia Lata Diaconia Cardinalizia\n852. Palazzo Panfili con R. A.\n853. Palazzo Panfili\n854 Palazzo Panfili\n855. Palazzo Verospi\n856. Palazzo d'Aste\n857. Palazzo Gottiftedi\n858. Vicolo della Gatta\n859. Chiesa di S. Marta, e Monast. di\nA gostiniane\n860. C. P. di S. Stefano del Cacco, eMo-\nnastero di Silvestrini\n861. Palazzo Altieri\n862. Palazzo Inganni\n863. Palazzo Colonna\n864. Scuole delle Mastre Pie\n865. Palazzo Amadei\n866. Cbiesa e Confr. delle Stimate di S.\nFrancesco\n867. Palazzi Marescotti\n868. Palazzo Cesi\n869. Chiesa di S. Gio. della Pigna\n870. Palazzo Nunez\n871. Palazzo Foseca\n872. Vicolo de Cestari\n873. Cbiesa di S. Chiara e Monastero di\nMonache di detta Santa\n874* Ruine delle Terme di Marco Agrippa\n875. Strada detta l'Arco della Ciambella\n876. Palazzo della Prelatura Spinola\n877. Palazzo Muti Sacchetti\n878. Palazzo della Prelatura Bussi\n879. Palazzo Strczzi\n880. Falazzo Origo\n881. Piazza Strozzi\n882. Palazzo Cesarini\n883. C. P. di S. Nicolo a Cresarini, e casa\nde Somaschi unita con arco\n884. Colonne 4 Antiche nel Coitile de'\ndette Somaschi\n885. Palazzo Colonna di Sonnino\n886. Torre nelPAbitazione Persiani\n887. Piazza, e Chiavica dell'Olmo\n888. Strada Florida\n889. Vicolo de' Cesarini\n890. Ospizio de' Preti Pellegrini\n891. Nuova Casa. e Scuole pie de' P. P.\ndelle Scuole pie\n892. Arco de' Ginnasi\n893. C. P. di S. Lucia delle Botteghe\noscure e Monastero de' Teresiane\n894. Palazzo Ginnasi\n895. Collegio Ginnasi\n896 Via Celsa\n897. Palazzo Montemarte\n898. Palazzo della comp. del Salvat. ad\nSan eta Sanctorum\n899. Palazzo Viseardi\n900. Palazzo Petroni\n901. Palazzo Petroni\n902. Cbiesa del Gesh, e Casa Professa\nde' Gesniti\n903. Palazzo di Venezia\n904. Vicolo di Madonna Lucrezia\n905. Cap. della B. V. presso S. Marco\n906. Piazza di Venezia con Fontana\n907. Cbiesa Colleg. e Paroc. di S. Marco\nT. C.\nRIONE X. - CAMPITELLI\n908. Orat., e Confr. di S. Gregorio Tau-\nmaturgo\n909. Palazzo Circi\n910. C. P. di S. Venanzo de' Camerinesi\n911. Palazzo Muti Bussi\n912. Palazzo Silvestri\n913. Palazzo Gamberuoci\n914. Cbiesa della B. Rita de' Casciani\n915. Vicolo della Pedacchia\n916. Palazzo dell'eredita di Pietro da\nCortona\n917. Cbiesa di S Maria d'Araeeli T. C.\ne conv. de' Min. Osservanti\n918. Palazzo del Mnseo Capitolino\n919. Palazzo detto dei Conservatori\n920. Resideuza del Senatore con Torre e\nCarceri an nesse\n921. Chiesa di S. Giuseppe de' Falegnami\nsopra la Carcere di S. Piet.ro\n921. Cbiesa della Carcere di S. Pietrodetta\nMaraertina e da molti Tulliana\n922. Orat. di S Giuseppe de' 1 alegnami\n923. Colonne del Tempio di Giove Tonante\n924. Portico del Tempio della Concordia\n925. Colonna Antica\n926. Dogana della Grascia con Torre\n927. Piazza di Carapo Vaccino con Fon-\ntana.\n928. Tre Anticlie Colonne Scanellate\n929. Cbiesa di S. M. Liberatrice\n930. R. dell'A. Palazzo de* Cesari\n931. Cbiesa di S. Bonaventura e conv\nde' Min. Osservanti del Ritiro\n932. Chiesa di S. Sabastiano alia pol-\nveriera\n933. Torre alia via della Polveriera\n934. Meta Sndante\n935. Arco di Costantino Magno\n936. Camp, di S. Maria della Pieta denfro\nl'ANTFITEATRO FLAYIO DETTO\nIL COLOSSEO\n937. Fenile prima sped, di S. Gio. La-\nterano\n938. Cbiesa di SS. Quattro Coronati T. C.\ne mouastero di Agostinianee conserv.\ndelle Or fane con Torre\n939. Cbiesa di S. Silvest.ro degli Scultori\ne Scarpelliiii annessa a d. Cbiesa\n940. Cbiesa di S. Maria Imperatriee\n941. Chiesa di S. Tomaso in Formis\n942. Chiesa di S. M. in Domenica T. C.\ne Monast. di Melchiti di S. Basilio\n943. Piazza della Navicella con Navi\nVotiva\n944. Obelisco nella Villa Mattei\n945. Cap. del Crocefisso nella Piazza\ndella Ferratella\n946. Cbiesa di S. Gio. a Porta Latina T.\nC. e Conv. de' Minimi della Pro-\nvincia Romana\n947. Cap. di S. Gio. in Oleo\n948. Arco di Neron Claudio Druso\n949. Chiesa di S. Sisto T. C. e conv. di\nDomenicani Irlandesi\n950. Cap. di S. Domenico Annessa\n951. Strada di S. Sisto Vecchio\n952. Vicolo delle Mole\n, 953. Luogo del Settizonio di Severo Imp.\n954. Chiesa di S. Gregorio Magno sul\nMonte Celio, e Monast. di Carnal-\ndolesi\n955. Cap. di S. Silvia in S. Gregorio\n956. Cap. di S. Andrea Apost. in S. Gre-\ngorio\n957. Cap. di S. Barbara in S Gregorio\n958. Chiesa di SS. Gio. e Paolo T. C. e\nNoviziato de' Missionari\n959. Ruina della Curia Ostilia\n960. Cap. di S. Maria de' Cerclii\n961. Cbiesa Colleg. di S. Anastasia T. C.\n962. Cbiesa di S. Teodoro creduta gi&\nTempio di Romolo\n963. Orat. e Confr. del Cuore di Gesu\n964. Strada delle Grazie\n► 965. Vicolo de' Fecili\n966. Cbiesa di S. M. della Consolazione\n967. Sped pergli Uomini feriti\n; 968. Cbiesa di S. Maria delle Grazie\n969. Spedale per le donne\n' 970. Strada di Monte Tarpeo\n. 971. Salita di Monte Caprino\n972.. Vicolo de' Saponari\n973. Vicolo della Bufbla e Muri Anicbi\n974. Piazza Montanara\n975. Chiesa di S. Maria in Vinci di Sa-\nponari\n976. Piazza della Catena, e Strada de'\nSngarari\n977. Oratorio di S. Andrea in Vinci degli\nScultori, e Scarpellini\n978. Rocca Tarpea\n979. Palazzo Oatfarelli\n980. Strada e Torre de' Specchi"}, {"page_pdf": 35, "page_imprimee": "33", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.35", "texte": "981. Chiesa e Confr. di S. Orsola e Ca-\nterina\n982. Ospizio de' Cistercien. delle Tre\nFontane\n983. Ospizio de' Geronimini di S. Alessio\n984. Palazzo Massimi\n985. Palazzo Ruspoli\n986. Chiesa di S. Francesca Rom. e Mo-\nnastero di Oblate dette di Tor de1\nSpecehi\n987. Palazzo Capizucchi\n988. Palazzo Artieri con Arco\n989. C. P. di S. M. in Portico da di Cam -\npitelli D. O. e Casa de Chierici Rego-\nlari della Madre di Dio\n990. Palazzo Cavalletti\n991. Piazza Capizucchi\n992. Palazzo Cardelli\n993. Palazzo Maccarani\n994. Piazza Margana\n995. Palazzo Astalli\nR I O N E XT. - S. ANG E L O\n996. Palazzo della Congr. de1 Nobili al\nGesu con Torre\n997. Palazzo Mattei di Paganica\n998. Strada delle Botteghe oscure\n999. Chiesa del Salvat. e S. Stanislao, e\nOspiz de* Polacchi\n1000. Vicolo de1 Polacchi\n1001. Palazzo Altieri\n1002. Palazzo Patrizi\n1003. Chiesa di S Caterina de Funari e\nMonastero di Agostinne, e conserv.\ndi Zitelle\n1004. Palazzo Mattei di Giove\n1005. Palazzo Negroni\n1006. Palazzo Mattei di Paganica\n1007. Piazza Paganica\n1008. Palazzo Moroni\n1009. Chiesa di S. Sebastiano de'Mercanti\n1010. Palazzo della comp. della Nunziata\nora depositaria Urbana\n1011. Palazzo Boccapaduli\n1012. Piazza Costaguti\n1013. Palazzo Santa Croce con Torre\n1014. Collegio delPTJmbria\n1015. Palazzo Costaguti\n1016. Piazza Mattei con fontana\n1017. Chiesa di S. Ambrogio della Mas-\nsima, e monasterio di Benedettine\n1018. Piazza Serlupi\n1019. Palazzo Serlupi\n1020. Chiesa Colleg., e Paroc. di S. An-\ngelo in Pascaria D. C.\n1021. Orat. di S. Andrea de* Pescivendoli\n1022. Palazzo Orsini gia TEATRO DI\nMAR CELLO\n1023. Piazza di Pescaria e Colonne An-\ntichi\n1024. Strada di Pescaria\n1025. Piazza Giudea fuori del Ghetto con\nfontana Ghetto degli Ebrei\n1026. Piazza Giudea dentro del Ghetto\n1027. Strada della Rua\n1028. Piazza de' Marcelli\n1029. Piazza delle Scuole con Fontana\n1030. Cinque Scuole degli Ebrei cioe Ca-\ntalana Siciliana, Castigliana Scuola\nnuova, e Scuola del Tempio\n1031 Strada della Finmara\n1032. Vicolo della Torre\n1033. Piazza delle 3 cannelle con font,la\n1034. Yicolo de' Savelli con fontana\n1035. Strada Quattrocapi\no RIO N E XII. - R I P A o\n1036. Chiesa di S. Gregorio a Ponte 4\nCapi e congr. della divina Piety\n1037. Palazzo dell'Emo Lercari\n1038. C. Colleg. e P. di S. Niccolo in\nCarcere D. C.\n1039. Orat , e Confr. del Sagramento in\n1040. Cliiesa di S. Galla, e Ospiz. per gli\nDomini\n1041. Ospiz. di S. Luigi Gonzaga per le\nDonne\n1042. Strada e Arco di Porta Leone\n1043. Piazza e Yicolo della Fontanella\n1044. Strada delle Carrozze'\n1045. Yicolo di Buccimazza\n1046. Chiesa di S. Omobono de' Sartori\n1047. Chiesa di S. Eligio de' Ferrari\n1048. Orat. di S. Eligio de' medesimi\n1049. Chiesa di S. Gio. Decollato della\nConfr. della Misericordia\n1050. Orat. di S. Gio. della medesima\n1051. Sepoltura de' Giustiziati\n1052. Sepoltura di S. Aniano de' Pia-\nnellari e Lavorati Calzolari\n1053. Arco detto di Giano\n1054. Arco eretto da Negozianti a Set-\ntimio Severo\n1055. Chiesa di S. Giorg'o in Velabro D.\nC. e Ospiz. di Agostiniani di Genova\n1056. Acqua Juturna\n1057. Luogo ove si seppelliscono i Giudei\n1058. Luogo del Circo Massimo\n1059. Chiesa di S. Prisca T. C. e Ospiz.\ndi Agostiniani Lombardi con R. A.\n1060. Chiesa di S. Balbina T. C e casa\ndi Pii Operari con Torre\n1061. Chiesa di SS. Nereo, e Achilleo T. C.\n1062. Chiesa di S. Cesareo T. C.\n1063. Acqnedotto di Claudio\n1064. Terme Antoniane\n1065. Conserve dell'Acqua di d. Terme\n3066. Chiesa di S. Saba\n1067. Cap. di S. Maria dell'Arco in un\nTorrione\n1068. Sepolcro di Caio Cestio\n1069. Luogo ove si seppelliscono i Pro-\ntestanti\n1070. Ruine dell'Emporio\n1071. Yicolo della Serpe\n1072. Strada della Marmorata con Arco\n1073. Cap. di S. Lazaro a Marmorata\n1074. Bastione di Paolo III\n1075. Chiesa di S. M. del Priorato\n1076. Chiesa di S. Alessio T. C. e Monast.\ndi Geronimini Lombardi\n1077. Chiesa di S. Sabina T. C. e con-\nvento de' Domenicani\n1078. Cap di S. M. Maggiore in Aventino\n1019. Ruine delle Terme di Traian Decio\nImp.\n1080. Strada della Salara con Arco\n1081. Antiche Saline\n1082. Antiche ruine\n1083. Yestigie del Ponte Snblicio\n1084. Chiesa di S Anna <le' Calzettari\n1085. Yioolo della Greca\n1086. Chiesa Colleg. insigne e paroc. di\nS. M, in Cosmedin D. C. detta la\nboccadella, Yerita, e ruine del Tem-\npio della Pudicizia\n1087. Piazza della Bocea della Yerita con\nfontana e font anile\n1088. Sbocco della Cloaca Massima\n1089. Chiesa di S. M. del Sole prima\nS. Stefano delle Carozze gi& Tem-\npio Antico\n1090. Chiesa di S. M. Egiziaca e ospiz.\ndegli Armeni gia Tempio della For-\ntuna Virile\n1091. Casa del Yolgo detta di Pilato\n1092. Ponte Fabricio or Quattro Capi\n1093. Chiesa di S. Gio. Calibita e conv.\nde' Benfratelli d'Italia\n1094. Sped, de' Suddetti\n1095. Yicolo della Moletta\n1096. Muri Antichi\n1097. Vicolo del Isnla, e muri antichi\n1098. C. P. di S- Bartolomeo all'Isola T.\nC. e conv. de' Min. osservanti con\nTorre\n1099. Ponte Cestio, or di S. Bartolomeo\nRIONE XIII. - TRASTEVERE\n1100. Piazza di Molara\n1101. Chiesa di S. Eligio de Sellari\n1102. Piazza delle Gensole\n1103. Yicolo delle Boccie\n1104. C. P. di S. Benedetto in Piscinola\n1105. Vicolo della Scarpetta\n1106. Strada della Malva\n1107. Ponte Senatorio or Ponte Rotto\n1108. C. P. di S. Salvatore a Ponte Rotto\n1109. Strada de' Vascellari\n1110. Orat. di S. Andrea de' Vascellari\n1111. Strada de' Salumi\n1112. Vicolo de' Frati\n1113. Yicolo della Palma\n1114. Piazza de' Vascellari\n1115. Yicolo de' Vascellari\n1116. Chiesa di S. M. in Cappella\n1117. Strada anicia, e Frangipaua\n1118. Strada Gregoriana\n1119. Conser. di S. Pasquale per Zitelle\n1120. Chiesa di S. Gio. de Genovesi con\nSpedale\n1121. C. P. di S. Cecilia T. C. e Monast.\nde' Benedettine\n1122. Chiesa di S. M. dell'Orto di 13 Uni-\nversity unite\n1123. Sped, di d. University\n1124. Vicolo del Canale\n1125. Dogana da del passo del Vino\n1126. Dogana di Ripa Grande\n1127. Chiesa di S. M. del buon Viaggio\nannessa alia chiesa di S. Agata in\nTrastevere\n1128. Chiesa della Traffigurazione del\nSig. dentro l'Ospiz. Apost. detto di.\nS. Micliele\n1129. Ospiz. per le donne iuvalide\n1130. Ospiz. per gli Uomini invalidi\n1131. Ospiz. per i Fanciulli in cura de'\nPP. delle Scnole Pie\n1132. Casa di Correzion de' Fanciulli\n1133. Carceri delle donno\n1134. Chiesa di S. Franc, a Ripa e conv.\ndi Min. Osserv. Riformati\n1135. Strada di Monticelli\n1136. Chiesa di SS. Cosmo, e Damiano\ndetta di S- Oosmato e Monastero di\nMonache di S. Chiara\n1137. Mura di Settimo Severo\n1138. Piazza di Fontana Secca\n1139. Chiesa di S. Pasquale giy ,SS. 40\nM. N. e conv. de' Min. Osserv.\nScalzi Spagnuoli\n1140. Strada delle Fratte\n1141. Strada delle Rim esse\n1142. Piazza di Monte di Fiore\n1143. C. P. di S. Grisogono T. C. e conv.\nde' Carmelit. della Congregazione di\nMantova\n1444. Orat. e Confr. della B.V. del Carmine\n1145. Piazza della Crocetta\n1146. Chiesa Paroc. di S. Salvat. della\nCorte, e Ospizio de Minimi della\nProv. Romana\n1147. Yicolo del Bnco\n1148. Yicolo della Crociata\n1149. Strada delle due Mole\n1150. Yicolo della Stella\n1151. Piazza dell'Olmo\n1152. Strada. I iazza del Muro Novo\n1153. Yicolo di Sacchetti\n1154. Chiesa di S. Bonosa de' Calzolai\n1155. Yicolo dell'Aicaccio\n1156. Chiesa di S. Agata, e Colleg. de'\nPP. della Dottr. Cristiana di Roma,\ne Scuole Pie\n1157. Piazza Romana\n1158. Torre della S. Casa di Loreto\n1159. Chiesa di S. M., e S. Gallicano\n1160. Sped, per gli Uomini\n1161. Sped, per le donne\n1162. Yicolo del Pozzo\n1163. Palazzo delle Monache di S. Anna\n1164. Chiesa di S. Calisto T. C. e Ospiz.\nde' Monaci Cassinensi\n1165. Chiesa Colleg. insigne di S. M, in\nTrastevere\n1166. Orat. e Contr. del Sagr. in d. Chiesa\n1167. Palazzo Ossoli\n1168. Palazzo Leoni\n1169. Chiesa di S. Apollonia e Monast.\ndi Monache del 3 Ordine di S. Franc.\n1170. Chiesa di S. Marg.ta, e Monast. d.\nMonache del 3 ordine di S. Franc0"}, {"page_pdf": 36, "page_imprimee": "34", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.36", "texte": "1171. C hie&a delle SS.. Rutin a, e Seconda\nMonast di Oblate Agostiniane\n1172. Piazza Ruaccia\n1173. Yicolo della Renella\n1174. Yicolo del Moro\n1175. Piazza di Renzi\n117«. Yicolo del Pelliccia\n1177. Yicolo del Cipresso\n1178. Piazza e Yicolo del Cinque\n1179. Piazza di Ponte Sisto\n1180. Yicolo del Bologna\n1181. Strada della Scala\n1182. Chiesa di S. Egidioero e Monastero\ndi Carmelitane Scalze\n1183. Yicolo del Leoncino\n1184. Yicolo del Merangolo\n1185. Vicolo della Frusta\n1186. Chiesa di S. Pietro in Montorio T.\nT. e Conv. de Min. Osservanti Ri-\nformati\n1187. Cap. della Crucifissione di S. Pietro\n1188. Piazza Pensile con Fontana\n1189. Cap. di S. Antonio di Padova\n1190. Fontana dell'acqua Paola\n1191. Acquedotto dell'acqua Paola\n1192. Orto Botanico della Sapienza\n1193. Bosco Parrasio degli Arcadi\n1194. Conservatorio dell'Assunta\n1195. Fabbrica del Tabacco\n1196. Chiesa di S. Maria de 7 dolori e\nMonastero di Oblate Agostiniane\n1197. Strada del Mattonato\n1198. Yicolo del Canestraro\n1199. Chiesa di S. Maria della Scala D.\nC. e Conv. de' Carmelit. Scalzi\n1200. Orat. e Confr. di S. Teresa in d. Ch.\n1201. Piazza degli Fornaci\n1202. Strada Benedetta\n1203. C. P. di S. Gio. della Malva e easa\nde Ministri degli Infermi\n1204. Orat. e Confr. del Sagr. in d. Chiesa\n1205. Vicolo de' Moroni\n1206. Chiesa di S. Dorotea, e Ospiz. de'\nMin. Conventuali della Provincia\nRoman a\n1207. Porta Settimiana\n1208. Strada della Longara\n1209. Yicolo de' Riari\n1210. Palazzo e Orti Corsini\n1211. Palazzo e Giardino Farnese\n1212. Antieo Palazzo di Agostino Ghigi\noggi Farnese\n1213. Strada de' Riari\n1214. Chiesa di S. Croce, e Monastero di\nAgostiniane della Penitenza\n1215. Yicolo delle Scalette\n1216. Chiesa di S. Giacomo e Monast. di\nMonache di le Convertite\n1217. Strada di S. G iacomo gik via Mas-\nsimi\n1218. Palazzo Lanti\n1219. Yicolo dir Spagna\n1220. Chiesa della Concezione e Monastero\ndi Oblate Camaldolesi\n1221. Ch iesa di S. M. Regina Coeli, e\nMonast. di Carmelitane Scalze\n1222. Strada di Regina Coeli\n1223. Chiesa della Yisitazione e Monast.\ndi Monache di S. Franc, di Sales\n1224. Vicolo d'Aliberti\n1225. Chiesa di S. Giusep., e Casa de'\nPii Operari\n1226. Chiesa di S. Leonardo e Ospiz. di\nEremiti Camaldolesi di Monte Ca-\nrona\n1227. Palazzo Salviati\n1228. Chiesa di S. Onofrio T. C. e conv.\nd'Eremiti del B. Pietro da Pisa\n1229. Luogo ove SermoneggianO i PP.\ndella Congr. dell'Orat.\n1230. Conserv. di S. M. dell'Rifugio detto\ndelle Penitent! del P.re Bussi\n1231. Conserv. di S. M. della Clemenza\ndetta delle Malmaritate\n1232. Cap. di S. Maddalena nello Sped,\nde' Pazzi\n1233. Sped, de Pazzi per Gli TJomini\n1234. Sped, per le donne\n1235. Cap. del SS. Crocifisso nel Ceme-\nterio di S. Spirito\ni R ION E XI V . - BORGO\n1236. Bastioni a' S. Spirito\n1237. Porta di S. Spirito\n1238. Cbiesa Paroc. di S. Spirito in Sascia,\ne Casa de' Canonici Regolari Ospi-\ntalieri\n1239. Palazzo della Residenza del Com-\nmendator di S. Spirito\n1240 Chiesa di S. Tecla in S. Spirito, e\nconserv. delle Fancinlle Projette\n■ 1241. Conserv. de' Fanciulle Projette\n1242. Sped, di S. Spirito\n1243. Aggiunta a' d' Sped, fatta da N.\nS. Benedetto XIY\n1244. Strada di Borgo S. Spirito\n1245. Orat. e Confr. di S. Spirito\n1246. Strada di Borgo Yecchio\n1247. Strada di Borgo Nnovo\n1248. C. P. di S. Giacomo Scossacavalli,\ne Piazza con Fontana\n1249. Orat., e Confr. del Sagr. in d. Ch.\n1250. Chiesa di S. Filippo Neri, e ospiz.\ndi quel che si convertono alia Fede\nCattolica\n1251. Palazzo deil'Ospizio suddetto\n1252. Abitazione de P.P. Gesuiti peni-\ntenzieri di S. Pietro in Yaticano\n1253. Piazza Sannesia\n1254. Palazzo Cavalieri gia Sannesi\n1255. Palazzo Serristori\n1256. Palazzo Cesi\n1257. Chiesa di S. Lorenzo in Piscibns e\nXoviziato de' P.P. delle Scuole pie\ne scuole publicbe de' medesimi\n1258. Palazzo Marij con Quartiere della\nGuardia Reale\n1259. Cbiesa di SS. Michele, e Magno\n1260. Palazzo Barberini con Yilla\n1261. Palazzo Cesi\n1262. Strada della Catena\n1263. Strada delle Carrette\n1264. Si to della Chiesa gia di S. Salva-\ntore al Torrione unita al Palazzo del\nS. Offizio :\n1265. Palazzo e Carceri del S. Offizio\n1266. Yicolo del Leoncino\n1267. Cappeletta della B. Y. Sotto l'Arco\ne Abitazione de Cavalligeri\n1267. Yicolo del Perugino\n1269. Strada di Campo Santo\n1270. Strada del Braccio\n1271. Chiesa di S. M. di Pietk in Campo\nSanto della Xazion Tedesca\n1272. Orat., e confr, di detta Xazione in\nd. Chiesa\n1273. Sped, di Campo Santo per le donne\nTedesche\n1274. Chiesa di S. Stefano degli Ungari\ndel Coll. Germanico Ungarico\n1275. Yicolo della Scalone\n1276. Cap. della Concezione\n1277. Seminario del Capitolo di S. Pietro\n1278. Chiesa di S. Martae, e Ospiz. de'\nTrinitsri Scalzi Italiani\n1279. Chiesa di S. Stefano, e ospiz. di\nMonaci Copti di S. Antonio Abate\n1280. Piazza del Fosso con Fontana\n1281. Acquedotto dell'Acqua Paola\n1282. Strada Scaccia\n1283. Mnra della Citta fatte da S. Leone IY\n1284. Sagrestia di S. Pietro in Yaticano\n1285. Chiesa Patriarc. e Paroc. di S. Pie-\ntro in Vaticano\n1286. Piazza di S. Pietro con 2 Fontane\ne obelisco gia del Circo di Nerone\n1287. Palazzi Pontifici Yatic. e Giardino\n1.288. Zecca Pontificia\n1289. Chiesa di S. Martino degli Svizzeri\n1290. Quartiere della Guardia Svizzera\n1291. Porta Antica di Roma e Corridore\ndi Alessandro YI\n1293. Strada di Borgo Angelico\n1293. Chiesa di S. Anna de Parafrenieri\n1294. Chiesa e confr. di S. Egidio\n1295. Chiesa di S. Pellegrino della Guar-\ndia Svizzera\n1296. Chiesa di S. M. delle Grazie, e conv.\nde' Romiti di Porta Angelica\n1297. Strada di Borgo Angelico\n1298. Strada di Borgo Vittorio\n1299. Piazza delle Yaschette\n1300. Piazza di Catalone\n1301. Strada di Borgo Pio\n1302. Strada del Campanile\n1303. Yicolo d'Orfeo\n1304. Yicolo delle Palle\n1305. Yicolo del Farinone\n1306. Yicolo del Mascherino\n1307. Piazza del Mascherino\n1308. Palazzo Accoramboni\n1309. Chiesa di S. M. della Purita de'\ncaudetari de* Sig.ri Card, con Arco\n1310. Palazzo Giraud\n1311. C. P. di S. M. Traspontina T. C. e\nCon. di Carmelitani\n1312. Orat. per la Dottrina Cristiana\n1313. Strada di Borgo S, Angelo\n1314. Chiesa di S. Angelo in Borgo\n1315. Orat. e Confr. di S. Angelo\n1316. Yicolo dei Frati\n1317. Yicolo del Yillano\n1318. Ponte Elio. o' Adriano, or S. Angelo\nJ 319. Mole Adriana, or Castel S. Angelo\n1320. Chiesa della B. Y. del Rosario den-\ntro il Castello\nTWO ABB RE VI AT10 NS.\nFrequently recurring.\nT. C. - Titolo Cardinalizio\nD. C. - Diaconia Cardinalizia\nERRATA.\nFor 331 Teatro Capranica read: 331\nPalazzo Capranica.\nROME\nWAS NOT\nBUILT\nI N A\nDAY"}, {"page_pdf": 37, "page_imprimee": "35", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.37", "texte": "MECHANISM INSTALLED IN THE TEATRINO\nOF THE COLLEGIO ROMANO IN ROMA.\n\nTHE PRIVATE TEAT RING\nOF THE COLLEGIO ROMANO\nIN ROMA\nJ. S.\n\nFROM THE CONTINUATION OF DUMONT'S\n41 PARALLfeLE DES PLANS ET DES PLUS\nBELLES SALLES DES SPECTACLES PUBLIQUES\no D'EUROPE\" OF 1760. o\nThis Continuation teas published 1775.\nI have selected these two and six other plans and\ndesigns of stages and stage scenes because they\nillustrate a point in the development of the Theatre\nin Roma in the 18th century,\nI have not seen them reproduced in any book\nor journal since they were first printed in that\ncentury. Every day it is the very celebrated\n\" La Scala \" at Milano, or the equally celebrated\n44 San Carlo \" in Napoli which we see reproduced\nfor us, until surely the world is in danger of\ngrowing tired of them.\nnpHE date when the theatre was put up in the\n•*» Collegio Romano is unknown to me : whether\nthere was one only or the place had more is also\nunknown to me.\nColleges in Italy were not slow to provide\ngood stages for the students and their study of\ndeportment and speech. In Parma in the first\nhalf of the 17th century we find in the Collegio\ndei Nobili such a theatre. This College continued\nto improve its theatre, and about 1652 had mo-\nveable scenes of the triangular kind of which Sab-\nbattini had written in 1637 ; and by about 1750\nhad two Theatres, one large and one small.\nThe point I wish to make, is, that documents\nexist which show us very complete Italian College\nTheatres, and that they are not merely temporary\nstages."}, {"page_pdf": 38, "page_imprimee": "36", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.38", "texte": "THE THREE LARGE ROMAN THEATRES OF THE 18th CENTURY.\n£. TEATRO ALIBERTI in Via Margutta. 2. TEATRO ARGENTINA in Strada de' Cesarini. 3. TEATRO\nTOR DI NONA opposite Castel Sant'Angelo.\nAll three were public Theatres. The Tor di Nona was first built in 1660 but soon destroyed by fire; it was\nrebuilt in 1671 : destroyed in 1698, and rebuilt in 1735, and this is the plan given above (fig 3). This buil-\nding was destroyed by fire in 1780, and again built in 1781 ; it fell in ruins in 1785 when it was again rebuilt,\nand again in 1795; restored in 1830, restored again in 1867, it was finally destroyed in 1882, and in 1886 demo-\nlished for ever to make room for a new embankment to the Tevere. Surely few Theatres have been more\nPhoenix-like. The Teatro Alibert or Aliberti (fig. /), first known as Teatro delle Dame, built in 1718, was\nburnt at the end of the 19th century. The Teatro Argentina (fig. 2) was built in 1732 and still exists."}, {"page_pdf": 39, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.39", "texte": "SCENE FROM THE OPERA \"CARLO MAGNO\",\nproduced in 1729 in the Ottoboni Teatrino and designed by\nN. Michetti: 1729.\nPlate 2.\n\nREPRODUCED FROM THE LIBRETTO OF 4< CARLO MAGNO n ROMA 1729.\nENGRAVINGS BY BALPASAR GABBUGGINi AND F. VASCONI.\n\nTHE PRIVATE TEATRINO OF CARDINALOTTOBONl\nin Roma, designed and built by the Architect Juvarra circa\n1700-1705.\n\nTHE MASK\n1925"}, {"page_pdf": 41, "page_imprimee": "37", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.41", "texte": "THE PRETTY\nTHEATRE\n\nPART TWO\nAS I said in my opening notes on this\ntheme, I do not intend to be critical. My\npurpose is more that of the print-collector\nthan of the writer.\nHave you not seen this print-collector in\nsome old shop, in Rue de la Seine or Rue\ndes Beaux Arts, as he sits by the hour\nturning over hundreds of prints of all subjects\nand of all centuries.... silent.... pausing to\nlook at some, turning over others without more\nthan a glance, picking out with deliberation,\nbut without a word said, one here, one\nthere ; laying them in a heap. Then, after a\ngood three hours' search, silently paying for\nthese, ....going home.... undoing his package....\ngoing more slowly over each print.... saying\nnothing.\nMy purpose is his: he thinks a devil of\na lot, may be ; but whatever he thinks it is\nhis delight in the print as a print, including\nsubject, condition of the print, name of en-\ngraver, date, quality of the work and price.\nAnd so is it here with me. If some are\ncensorious, when they hear of Mile. Guimard,\nSophie Arnould and Madame Montansier, to\nselect three of the most remarkable names\nfrom a big bouquet, .... if some find the private\ntheatres of the first two ladies mere hot-beds\nof vice and the many public theatres ruled\nover by the third dens of infamy, I have come\nto look on them as the old print collector looks\nupon his treasures. They have cost me very\nlittle, and have given me great pleasure:\nI have read so much about them, seen the\nhouses they made and seen them recorded again;\n1 have seen them die : even come to forget\nthem in the centuries which followed: remem-\nbered them again while contemplating subse-\nquent centuries : see them again now. I for\none cannot pick one of them out for censure.\nBut I muse at times: La Guimard is\nworth the threepence I gave for her: Sophie\nat a golden guinea was not dear: Madame\nMontansier .... I would any day give again\nthe shilling I was asked for her and without\na murmur.\nIf the price is sometimes low, what of that:\nI gave what the print-seller asked. For a song\nby Mozart there is no price, ....so rare that\nfew can hear it, so cheap that anyone may\nhave it: for a glance at the Palazzo Ducale\nin Genova nothing is asked ; you may even\npass it for nothing and not see it. So that\nit seems that the price of a thing is nothing\nby which to guage the value : \" nothing for\nnothing and dam little for sixpence \" sounds\npretty so far as it goes, but the sound is its\nprincipal asset. There is not truth there.\nYou sometimes can get all for nothing and\nsometimes for a thousand pounds nothing.\nThe pretty is often held to be so cheap\nthat it is not worth any notice at all; and\nassuredly a little of it can be afforded by any\nof us and is useful to all. It is useless to\ndeny that. \"Whether in certain centuries it\nwas worth quite so much as the price put on\nit is another matter. I cannot tell; ....I leave\nit to the Due d'Orleans and the Prince d'Henin\nto settle that between them.... if they ever\nmeet nowadays.\nThe pretty, spite of it being so cheap,\npossibly cost the Theatre of Europe and its\nDrama a pretty penny. What of that?....\nare we not here today to pay the mortgage ?\nI have the utmost sympathy with those\nwho feel they are too poor to do more than\nadd to this debt, for the next century will have\nto pay. Possibly that is one of the reasons\nwhy so many well-to-do actors nowadays warn\ntheir sons against taking up the profession.\nBut let us return to my print shop.\nThe last time I was in Zenabella I\ndiscovered a book in my print shop. It was\na hovel of a place, and there lay Zola's\n\" Nana \". I bought it; I took it home and\nI read it.\n\nNANA.\n\n\" All Paris Will visit your Theatre \" Say,\nmy brothel, answered the Manager\nI suppose that there are very few people\nliving today who are reading Emile Zola's\nnovel \" Nana \" for the first time : yet I have\nbut just finished reading it and for the first\ntime, although I began it some thirty years\nago and came to a full stop at the passage\nin Chapter One where a manager of a Theatre\nasks a habituee of his playhouse to drop the"}, {"page_pdf": 42, "page_imprimee": "38", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.42", "texte": "word \" theatre \" and substitute the word\n\" brothel\" (0.\nKnowing dozens of theatres which were\nserious places, (serious as churches, banks, or\nships) I drew the line at any further interest\nfor a book, whose author, I saw, promised to\nkeep up the fantastic old delusion of the out-\nsider.\nThat the theatre this Zola was to write\nof, was no theatre at all, settled it for me that\nI should not be interested. I put the book\ndown.\n€J That I was probably prejudiced only\noccurs to me now. For have not there been\nwriters who made novels out of Banks full of\nThieves, Churches full of Knaves ? The\nworld is full of men and women, and men and\nwomen full of pranks, passions, vices and\nvirtues.\nAre we to read only about virtues and\nthe virtuous ? They exist and are often hidden,\nand so to reveal them with what we call\n\" art * is to do a trick not without beauty.\nBut no virtue is quite valuable surrounded by\na sea ot virtues ; how mark a poor single virtue,\nhow illumine it, if no vices are there to set\noff its brilliance ? Too much virtue may be\nas vile as too much vice.\n* * *\nCI So three days ago when I was in need\nof a book to read .... a novel above all else....\nI happened to pick up a copy of \" Nana\"\non a bookstall. For three francs I bought it,\nand in three days I have read it.\nAnd it is awefull.\nIt deals with the life of a woman who\ngoes on to the stage without any qualifications,\nwithout genius or talent, unable to act, but\npossessed of an astounding personality.... of\nthe personality which attracts.... of animal\nmagnetism.\nThis personality is not the personality of\na Rachel, who also attracted besides having\na genius as a tragic actress; it is not a bril-\nliant personality, it is just a weak one; she\nis amiable, a hundred times amiable, loveable,\nand all over the place.\nBy means of this personality displayed on\nthe stage she brings all Paris to her feet.\nShe lives every kind of life, ....in poor quar-\nters, in gaudy well-to-do ones, in neat ones,\nin sumptuous ones, and finally dies of the\nsmallpox, her face eaten away.\nTo the end, and even beyond it, she\nstill continues to attract.\nThis is not repulsive although it does not\nsound exactly attractive. But there is an un-\nder current which is interesting, more attrac-\ntive, stranger, for those of us who work in\nTheatres and want to see the Theatre of the\nworld taking on a new lease of life. It is a\ntheme which recurs and recurs, and each\ntime it does so it reminds us of paragraphs\nwe read today in the newspapers, or of photo-\ngraphs we have seen only yesterday in the\nshop windows. It is the theme of the Impre-\nsario and the hangers-on to Theatres, ....let\nit be instantly added the tenth-rate ones, these\nflashy gentlemen with their big press agencies\nand their paragraphed expressions of heartfelt\ndesire to uplift the drama, even to make it\nsacred, ....even if they have to sweeten the\npill for the public by serving up the moral\nwith something that tastes good; in short, the\nmost beautiful women that can be found in\nEurope and America.\nWe hear of these funny fellows every day.\nIn \" Nana \" we have their portraits.\nII.\nWHEN some suave theatrical impresario or\ndirector wrote to Nana, ....was she at\nthat time in Berlin or Prague?... saying he\nwanted to see her really a success, that it\nwas his way to work for love could not\ndream of business where she was concerned,\n....that her immense talents were being hid-\nden, that he felt it was part of his life's work\nto bring her to Pariis (or was it New York ?),\nshe naturally ran off to Paris or New York\nas quickly as possible. Yes, it was to Paris\nshe ran. And became a great success ; had\nsome twenty lovers immediately, ....yes, in-\nstantly.... ; took up with a twenty-first, a man\n\n(1) Even today I wince for the Theatre when Zola\nis so appalling rude about it. Yet Ido not find him old-\nfashioned although it is the fashion to call him that. The\nthing which makes him seem so to people of today is that\nthey have not read him. If Congreve be up-to-date it is\nbecause they do read him. Zola is now successfully\ndisposed of after a struggle, and because he added grief\nand pain to his tale he is to be shelved. Had he spangled\nand powdered his heroine at her death and let her laugh\na little more ironicallyv she and he today would be a la\nmode."}, {"page_pdf": 43, "page_imprimee": "39", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.43", "texte": "of wealth and left the twenty for a month ;\nthen after a few weeks more took the twenty\nback with the twenty first. Then threw them\nall over; disappeared with a hideous looking\nactor ; stayed with him a few months in more\nor less poverty in Montmartre; then sank to\nworse poverty and haunted the cafe of some\nold woman who was always eager to see new\nfaces ; appeared on the stage for two nights,\nand in those two nights managed to win ano-\nther protector, who lavished on her millions\nof francs ; ...♦all this was quite natural. The\nimpresario and the manager, looking holy,\nwere photographed with the lady between them;\nall Paris was impressed, .... just like today.\nAnd our 1924 Theatre is where it was\nin 1870: it is where these impresarios and\nmanagers, with their clever manipulation of\nwomen, would have it.\nIt is devilish clever to be sure. The\nworld gets bitten by a longing to see a sa-\ncred play, ....having heard that the Oberam-\nmergau Passion Play is not to be seen unless\nthe world will travel all the way to Oberam-\nmergau, and then only once in every ten\nyears. So the impresario and the manager\nresolve to make up a substitute to console a\nfretful world. It shall have its sacred play,\n.... but it wont really be so sacred as all\nthat, because we are prudent gentlemen from\nthe East, and know that the 'Western world\n(which, by the way, we despise) only wants\nto have the shadow of sacred things ; if there\nmust be any substance let it be as fleshy as\npossible.\nAnd Nana is again caught in the net....\nand landed ever so gently; put on the mar-\nket ; praised by the modern press agent month\nby month for her dramatic virtues, then each\nwreek, then each day; cables are sent round\nthe world of her amazing talents (and she\nwith but one, ard that the old magnetism\npossessed by myriads of women) ; photographs\nfill the back pages of daily papers; and a\nrich man, also from the East, is found to act\nnobly by supporting the immense expense,\n....so great is his love for art ....and religion,\nespecially the Christian religion. In short the\nwhole thing almost causes the impresario to\nbreak down with emotion so noble he is, she\nis, they all are.\nEvery day and in every land this is being\ndone in Theatres, on a small scale and on a\nlarge scale.\nIf not a \" religious \" play it's a Revue,\nor a Historical play; any old theme serves,\n.... it's the woman is the goods.\nDo you want any examples pointed out\nto you ? There's no need, they are so evident.\nThe small town of Zenabella, in which, I\nwrite this, has given me the details which I\nhave here related.\nPerhaps in New or in Paris or in\nLondon today there are no ludicrous jokes of\nthis sacred art business being perpetrated.\nI leave you to decide that.\nBut here in Zenabella a dark-skinned\nfellow of the name of Moses Bethany came\nand bamboozled the entire province (and the\ntown itself) with his productions of a thing\nhe called \" A Miraculous Play \", in which\nthere was nothing sacred at all. But hew he\nfooled them ! ! !\nSo do read \" Nana it tells you how\nit is done so much better than I can.\n€jj A strange and sad point made by\nZola is the amazing infidelity of his Heroine :\nhe is always returning and returning to this.\nOf her amours I do not speak; I refer to the\ninfidelity of her mind. And she and most\nof her fellow-actresses are adepts at abusing\neveryone with their tongues. Yet Madame\nBerton's pretty book had not then appea-\nred (1).\nThere is hardly one, favoured or not fa-\nvoured, whom these ladies do not abuse like\npickpockets. It is a curious point; ..S.is it true\nto life ?\nHave actresses such utterly unfaithful minds,\nso little control over their tongues? Do they\nreally slander to the extent Zola makes out ?\nIf so, is it due to the constant changing of\ntheir very nature each night, due to their pro-\nfession which forces them to this capacious\nversatility ? Is it due to this profession that\nthey come to behave like nothing real, and\nsee all real life and living beings as false life\nand false beings,as they open a door on the\nstage and go on into an unreal existence ? I\nthink it is; and so possibly they may be\nexempt from the blame due to others, for they\nhave no sense left of realities.\nIf this be true, then, if they lied they\nwould lie like truth, making the very truth\nseem falsehood to it\" : this goes without saying.\nOne is not an actress, 1 suppose, for nothing.\n\n(I) Vide Mask. Vol, X. Page 135."}, {"page_pdf": 44, "page_imprimee": "40", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.44", "texte": "And yet so many of these great ladies in the\nParis story are dancers, singers, chorus-girls ;\nall blended together, as in life, I suppose;\njournalists, singers, bankers, painters and girls ;\nan odd crew.... and all so real.\nOne wonders, is the whole book a libel,\nor is it true ?... or is it mezzo e mezzo.\nIII.\nNOW it begins to look as though these few\nnotes on the Pretty Theatre were soon\nto develope into the Ugly Theatre.\nBut 'tis no such thing. The prettiness is\nthere, and under it what is under all else.\nWe shall soon come to pretty Mile. Gui-\nmard, her mother, Mr Leger and the Mar-\nquis de Soubise. And Fragonard will step\ninto the room ... or rather into that little pri-\nvate Theatre of hers ; and Fragonard is a\nguarantee for the perfection of prettiness.\nA few measurements of her theatre, a\nfew dates as to when the place was put\nup ....and put up for auction.... cannot de-\ntract greatly from the charm; dates are in\nany case valuable as a basis for Terpsicore\nto pirouette on.... and even to die on,... for-\ngotten.\nPoor Terpsichore, one of \" le ballerine \"\nwho dominated nGt only the realms of the\nstage but also those of \"la Galanterie \".\nTo be continued.\n\nX. Y. Z.\n\nIMITATION.\nA NOTE\nBY JAN KLAASSEN\nWITH STORY BY A. DUMAS PERE.\nIMITATING to perfection is certainly a talent,\nand it is this special talent which is pos-\nsessed by the Russians. They derive it from\nthe far East.\nAnd in the Russian Theatre this talent has\nbeen so cleverly employed that it has tho-\nroughly dazzled Europeans and Americans.\nWith the Russians imitation really be-\ncomes almost masterly.\nIn defence of this it is often with justice\nadvanced that Russians are not the only imi-\ntators : that even Italy was glad to derive from\nthe East, and that her Architecture, Painting,\nhouse decoration and all is directly inspired\nby the East. Nay, more, Eastern artists came\nto Italy at a moment when the arts were in a\nsad plight, and helped the Italians to recover\nthemselves.\nBut that is quite another matter, and the art\nof the Italian architects, sculptors, and painters,\nthough derived from Greece or Byzantium\nin the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, (0 is a\nrather greater feat than the making of a wig\nwhich, when worn, is to be taken for growing\nhair.\nTo derive from another nation is not to\nimitate slavishly. The Italians have derived,\nbut have not the requisite nature or knack for\nimitating. The Russians assuredly have both\nthis nature and the knack.\nRussia's far-famed Ballet is the fruit of\nthis slick talent, and the other forms of Dra-\nmatic art are thought out and executed by men\nwho possess immense powers of mimicry.\nBy this I do not mean that they take ideas\nfrom Antoine or from Reinhardt: I mean that\nthey take a drama to pieces, find models of\neach piece in life, and then with astounding\npatience, make facsimiles so that you can hardly\ntell the difference from the originals.\nPersonally I find this very attractive, just\nas I found the Queen's Dolls' House attractive.\nIt seemed to me to be a real Palace in mi-\nniature.... all was there.... only a small Pri-\nvate Theatre was lacking.\n\n(/) Those interested in this subject can trace it out in\ninnumerable works on Italian art. The following are a few\nlines taken here and there from the \" Renaissance in Italy\n{Fine Aids) \" by J. A, Symonds, referring to the Oriental and\nGrczco-Roman influences felt by the early masters of archi-\ntecturey painting and sculpture, such as Cimabue, Niccola Pi-\nsano, and other thirteenth century artists.\n41 The Tuscans never forgot the domes of their remote\nancestors; the Romans adhered closely to Latin traditions;\nthe Southerners were affected by Byzantine and Saracenic\nmodels\ntl The intercourse of Venice with Alexandria determined\nthe unique architecture of S. Mark's. The Arabs and Nor-\nmans left ineffaceable traces of their sojourn on Palermo.\n....All along the coasts we here and there find evidences of\nOriental style imported into mediaeval Italy....\n\" Existing thus in the midst of many potent influences, and\nsurrounded by the ruins of past civilisation, the Italians re-\ncombined and mingled styles of marked variety. The Roman,\nByzantine, Saracenic, Lombard, and German traditions were\nblended in their architecture, as the presiding genius of each\nplace determined.\n41 In the Campo Santo at Pisa may still be seen a sarcho-\nphagus representing the story of Hippolytus and Phcsdra....\nStudying the heroic nudities and noble attitudes of this bas-\nrelief Niccola {Pisano) rediscover ed the right way of art—\nnot by merely copying his model, but by divining the secret of\nthe grand style."}, {"page_pdf": 45, "page_imprimee": "41", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.45", "texte": "I admit that mimicry may possibly have\nno relation whatever with art: anyhow it in-\ntrigues me.\nAs an illustration of this colossal power of\nmimicry I think the following tale by Alexandre\nDumas pere will please.\nDumas visits a private Collection in a small\ntown of Southern France belonging to\nM. Grassei: —\n\" I confess that I expected to see one of\nthose poor collections to be met with in pro-\nvincial towns, with three or four stuffed fish\nhanging from the ceiling; but I was agreably\nsurprised to find in the very first room some\nmagnificent vases by Bernard de Palissy, and\na complete collection of stones and minerals\nfrom Mount Sinai,—a collection which, pro-\nbably, could not be found in the Paris Mu-\nseum of Natural History. Unfortunately I was\nnot sufficiently learned in minerology to appre-\nciate it properly : I accordingly turned to a\nquantity of objects of the middle ages, and\nabove all to some locks and keys, which\nwere carved with a taste and skill that would\nhave done honour to Benvenuto Cellini.\nIn this manner we passed successively\nthrough four or five rooms, filled with cu-\nrious objects, the majority of which had been\nprocured for M. Grasset by one of his friends,\na learned and brave sea-captain, who had\nsailed round the world I don't know how\nmany times, and who had arrived back from\nChina about a fortnight or three weeks pre-\nviously, bringing with him a most singular\nexample, not of the intellect, but of .the pa-\ntience, of the worshippers of the Great Dragon.\nAmongst the different pairs of trousers\nwhich the captain had had made for him be-\nfore leaving Paris there was one which was\nconsidered a master-piece: it was one of those\nmiracles which sometimes issue from the esta-\nblishments of Vaudeau or Poole, and which\nenvelop the boots, indicate the calf, abolish\nthe knee, mark the thigh, and deny the exis-\ntence of corporation. Accordingly, thanks to\nthe predilection entertained for them by their\nowner, the trousers, after having flourished\nalong the coast, at the Cape of Good Hope\nand the Isle of France, arrived at Canton,\nnearly worn out. Nevertheless, owing to that\nfashionable cut of which nothing, not even the\nfact of being new, can supply the place, they\nstill looked very well, when the Sailor, who\nserved as the captain's valet, spilled half the\noil contained in af lamp which he was clea-\nning, on the very middle of the thigh of the\nunfortunate pair.\nThis blow, in spite of his philosophy, had\nsuch an effect upon the captain, that he had\nnot quite recovered from it when one of his\nCanton associates came as usual to smoke a\npipe of opium with him. He found him in\nsuch a state of vexation that he feared some\ngreat misfortune must have befallen him, and\naccordingly enquired what had occurred to\nalter his habitual good humour. The captain\nshowed him the unfortunate trousers, which he\nhad now thrown aside : — \" There ! \" said\nhe, \"just look ! The very pair you were com-\nplimenting me on yesterday ! \".\nThe friend took the trousers, and turned\nthem about with the most provoking calm.\nWhen he was quite convinced that they could\nhot be worn again, he observed : —\n\" Well, you must have another pair made \".\n\" Another pair made! \" retorted the ca-\nptain, \" And who's to make another pair,\n.... some of your Chinese fellows ? \".\n\" Certainly, some of my Chinese fellows! \"\nreturned the friend with imperturbable coolness.\n\" Yes, and get a sack sent to me, made\nin their regular style! \" continued the captain,\nshrugging his shoulders.\n\" They won't make you a sack \", said the\nother,\" and, if you only supply them the model\nupon which you want them made, they will\nturn you out a pair of trousers that Vaudeau\nwouldn't know from his own \".\n\" Really ? \", said the captain.\n\" Upon my honour \", assured the friend.\n\" Weil, I have heard hundreds of times of\nthe fidelity of the Chinese in imitation \".\n\" And what you have heard upon the\nsubject has been less than the truth \".\n\" By heaven, you make me anxious to try\nthem\n\" Do try, especially as it won't cost you\nmuch. How much did you pay for those\ntrousers ?\n\" Fifty-five or sixty francs, I don't quite\nremember \".\n\"Well, you can see what they're capable\nof doing here for fifteen \".\n\" And what tailor must I take them to ? \".\n\" The first you come to. Mine if you like,\nhe lives at the gate \"."}, {"page_pdf": 46, "page_imprimee": "42", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.46", "texte": "The captain takes his trousers under his arm,\nfollows his friend, and arrives at the tailor's.\n\" Now \", said the friend, \" explain what\nycu want, and I will translate your words\nto him \".\nThe captain did not need to be told twice,\nand, spreading out the trousers, he pointed\nout their cut, and ended by saying that he\nwanted a pair exactly like them. The friend\ntranslated the order, and laid great stress on\nthe directions.\n\" Very well \", said the tailor, \" in three\ndays the gentleman shall have what he wants\".\n\" What does he say? \" asked the captain\nimpatiently.\n\"He says you shall have them in three\ndays \".\n\" Three days ! That's a long time \", says\nthe captain.\nThe friend translated the captain's remark\nto the Chinese, who looked at the trousers\nagain, shook his head, and said a few words\nin reply to the interpreter.\n\"Well?\" asked the captain.\n\" He says there's a great deal of work\nto do and that three days are not too long\nin order to have it done properly \".\n\" Well, three days then: but don't let him\nbreak his word \".\nAnd the two friends went away, repeating\ntheir directions to the craftsman for the last time,\nThree days afterwards, as the captain and\nhis friend were smoking their pipe of opium,\nthe servant opened the door, and announced\nthe tailor.\n\"Oh ho\", said the captain; \"Well, let\nus see if he is as skilful as he is punctual\".\n\" There they are \" said the tailor.\n\" Let's try them \", said the captain as he\ntook the trousers from the hands of the tailor,\nput them on, and, in order to be certain that\nthey fitted well, told the tailor to draw up the\nblinds.\n\" Why, they fit wonderfully\", said the\nfriend.\n\"I should think so\" said the captain:\n\" he has given me my old pair. But where\nare the others, you stupid ? \" he exclaimed to\nthe Chinese.\nThe friend translated the remark to the\ntailor, who gave the other pair with a trium-\nphant look.\nThe captain changed the trousers.\n\"Well, I must be mad \" said he. \" This\npair now seems to be mine. Where can the\nnew ones be ?\nThe friend expressed the captain's doubts\nto the tailor, who held out the trousers upon\nwhich he had just finished working.\n\"Well, here is the new pair\" said thefriend.\n\"No, can't you see they are the old\nones ? \" replied the captain. \" Why hang it,\nthere's the spot of grease ! \".\n\" And there's one on the pair you have\n°n What' fool's wit can this be?\"\n\" The friend turned to the Chinese, que-\nstioned him, and, upon hearing his reply,\nburst into a shout of laughter \".\n\"Well?\" said the captain.\n\" Well \", said the friend, \" What did you\norder from this good man \" ?\n\" I ordered a pair of trousers \".\n\" Like your own \".\n\" Yes, like my own\n\"Well, he has made them so like that\nyou can't tell the difference that's all. But\nhe tells me that his greatest trouble has been\nto wear them out, and spot them in exactly\nthe same places ; and that he must charge you\nfive francs extra, because he failed with two\npairs before coming to a satisfactory result;\nnow, however, he defies you to distinguish\none pair from the other. You must allow\nthat that's well worth twenty francs \".\n\" Indeed it is \", replied the captain, as\nhe drew a Napoleon from his pocket and gave\nit to the Chinese,\nThe Chinese thanked him, and asked for\nthe Captain's custom so long as he remained\nin Canton, although, he added, if he always\nhad such difficult work given him, there would\nbe no profit on it.\nFrom that day the captain could never tell\none pair of trousers from the other, so much\nalike were they. He brought them both back\nto France as specimens of Chinese industry,\nand had promised to make a present of them\nto M. Grasset. If he kept his word, they\nmust be far from being the least interesting\nthings in the collection.\nMOSCOW and Leningrad are midway\" on\nthe road from Paris to China. The\ntrousers may be Parisian, but the trick is\nOriental; and the net result, as someone has\nremarked, the synthetic Orient Express."}, {"page_pdf": 47, "page_imprimee": "43", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.47", "texte": "\"THE SACKBUT\" AND\nTHE NEED FOR MUSIC.\nBY GORDON CRAIG.\nWHENEVER I see \" The Sackbut \", that Musical\nReview with a gay cover which appears every month,\nand costs but one shilling, and is altogether quite an achieve-\nment, I am always delighted. The production is due to the\nenergy of Miss Ursula Greville, her managing Editor,\nand her Committee, which includes, amongst others, P. G.\nKonody and Granville Bantock.\nIt contains excellent historical articles on Lully, Rossini,\nJohn Braham, and other articles by modern writers, ....by\nKalisch and Gatti on Strauss and Malipiero, it is a most\nreadable shillingsworth, and its publishers are J. Curwen and\nSons Ltd.\nI would suggest that the need for music is positive, and\nthat if something can be done to bring it to U3 rather more\noften something should be done.\nI am today well fitted to say a word for the first time\nabout the need for music, for, though I am only an artist,\nand ignorant of the history of music, and quite unaware\nwho really is who in the modern stream, I am one who\nonce made a daily use of music; I mean i fed on it.\nAnd when I can no longer hear it I fear to grow thin\nat heart; and if it does not come to me I cannot hear it;\n....and so I starve, for seldom does it come.\nBut I have been hearing it for the last six days. I hear\nit from four in the afternoon until long past midnight. And\nthen I hear it once more in the morning from ten to eleven.\nWill you know where I am and what it is I hear ?\nI am in a big town in the north of Italy, having come\nhere to see and study an old and celebrated Theatre.\nI lodge in a top-but-one-floor room of a hotel which\nlooks on to a very untidy courtyard ; and the courtyard is\nfull of hangings and cries and thuds and knockings. The\nfar-off hum of wheels and motor horns is soothing to my\near, which finds the slamming of shutters, the beating of\ncarpets, the howls of servants, ringing of big electric bells,\nand crackling of cutlery and china, something to meet with\nfortitude.\nSo much for the noise.\nBut, as I said, this noise gives way to music at four\no'clock, No noise could stand up against such music. I rather\nlike it; it has the common touch which Mr. Kipling tells\nus we should try never to lose. Ido not believe 1 shall\nlose it; but, spite of Mr. Kipling, to say truly I sometimes\nwish 1 could. And my wish is in a measure granted, for\nI lose it in the morning as I will tell you later.\nThis music, from four o'clock to past midnight, which\nsweeps the courtyard of all its hideous noises, breaks threa-\nteningly outside my window in a great splash, and 1 feel\nin danger. I mean it quite seriously but without offence ;\nI am threatened by the breakers of modern Jazz music.\nTo this Jazz, millions of people dance each afternoon and\nevery night when bored by the dull old fashioned tinkle\nat the Cinema. (It is, I hear, now acknowledged that folk\nonly go to a cinema for the sake of the music).\nThe first time it attacked me I stood and listened to it\nwith attention for full ten minutes. Perhaps this show of\nrespect for it appeased and propitiated its far-off god and\nwon for me the favour of its own African particular; for\nwhen I sat down to listen to it without impatience for the\nnext thirty minutes I found it bearable.\nI concluded that I could stay without doubt where I was;\nneed not move to another hotel as for a moment 1 had\nfelt I should have to do ; and that 1 could do my work,\nwhich, whatever it be, I always enjoy doing, and in more\nor less any reasonable surroundings.\nSo I tried to work. 1 got on quite well; though 1\nadmit I was feeling quite ill.\nFor eight days I felt quite ill every time I heard that\nmusic, but now I hive grown to rather like it. At first\nI believed that I was out of touch with it, because I was\nnot down there and in it; and dancing hellishly in the flames\nwith some deadly serious modern lady who is not such a\nfool as to ask why she does anything but just does it.\nWell, I don't always like to be outdone by the great,\nso every afternoon from four to eight and from ten to\ntwelve I will work on through this steaming noise, (which\n1 am beginning to like) this landing-stage chatter, and ask\nno questions.\nBut its morning now, and up above me a player, I\nthink a careful lady-player, has just ended an hour s\npractice. She has the uncommon touch. Of all tunes to\nhear coming down to me from on high, one of Chopin's\nslighter and loveliest things was the most unexpected. ..\nand the sun seemed to break through the ceiling.\ni have heard this piece of music some hundred times ;\nbut not since 1937 have I chanced to hear it.\nThat is a long time to be without something on which\none feeds, and I mention it because it is a serious matter,\nthis starving of the heart.\nI cannot engage a private orchestra, and I cannot go\nout to hear music. Very often there is none to go out\nto hear, i have to work, and regularly. I daresay I could\nwork less regularly.\nSo as I cannot hear music in my home by the sea, near\nGenova, or go out to hear it, perhaps I ought to stay in this\ntop-but-one floor room for the rest of my life since I have\nagain found music, ....and ask no questions as to its quality.\nI ought to embrace the full ignorance of the shattering\nstrains and move to its blood and thunier rhythm which\nis not without decision; allow my new work to be colou-\nred by its blood and strengthened by its thundering, its\nclanging and tumbling form; for there seems a chance that\nin the morning the dear lady upstairs may be practising her\nbit over and over again. These seventeen years I have been\nmore or less without all music, and that is, I submit, to\nbe without a very needful thing.\nIf when 1am at home a man with a dancing bear\nchances to comes down the road 1 go to the window and\nwatch and listen ;orif an organ passes and, playing as it\npasses, passes away, I go on with my work thoroughly\ndisturbed, but thoroughly ....and well disturbed as I follow\nit to the last far off note. All that was difficult becomes\nas easy as laughing then; all that was problematical is\nsolved. Wasn't that music; and isn't that where music\nis so magical. And mustn't music come and go like that,\n....sometimes lingering a while longer, causing us to throw\ndown the spade or the pen, to stop measuring, and to stand\nstill and silent in our room or our field ?\nIs not that music ?\nIf it be, when may we expect to be favoured with a\nlittle ?\nIs Music perhaps a national thing?... if so, then of\ncourse each nation will see that it is put in its right place....\nthat it waits its turn. First the tram service, next the matter\nof drainage, and then that bothersome music.\nBut if music is not a National thing, if it is so good,\nso easy, so harmless that individuals can deal with it, let"}, {"page_pdf": 48, "page_imprimee": "44", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.48", "texte": "them. 1 mean bring it alive again, and bring it in the right\nway and the easiest way to everyone who needs it.\nHow ? There must be ten thousand ways besides the\n44 Merrie England \" way. I suggest that the ordinary way\nmight be discovered.\n* The organs and the bears and the traffic meantime\nremain to cheer us, three or fcur times a year; until, with\nhearts once more whole again, musicians ccme pouring back\nto our cities, and we hear many dozens of old tunes\nagain—as I hear one of mine now on the floor above me.\nThe positive need for music has not, 1 think, just yet\nbeen made clear to those people who have the control of\nmost things in the world, and who, by a little thought,\ncould bring music again into our daily existence.\nThere is Mr. Otto Kahn ; there was Sir Ernest Speyer;\nthey both gave large sums of money I am told to secure\nmusic a hearing in London and New York. There was\nthe Comtesse Greffuhle in Paris; there is Contessa Picco-\nlomini in Roma. These lovers of music have done a little\n—all they could do—and yet music does not reach me\nor you or our neighbours.\nThere is Lord Berners ; there is Vaughan Williams and\nGoossens, and there is Martin Shaw in London. Shaw is\nassuredly trying to get music to those who need it; and\npossibly others are doing something. But as well attempt\nto send coals from Newcastle in a handbag as leave the\ndistribution of music to the unaided efforts of the men who\nare making it.\nIt's a life's work to create any little tune anyhow;\nand then to spread it far and wide, that takes a whole life;\nand Kahn, Speyer, Morgan and Ford cannot give up their\nbanking and motor businesses to devote their full time and\nstrength to the spreading of music far and wide.\nIf they could, it is just such energies who could do\nthis task ; ....no lesser effort by lesser men can do it.\nIt's folly to fail about music, and failure has been\nachieved if we are only to get it by going to a theatre for\nit—or to a concert.\nMusic means health ; it means light; it means all which\na world today unable to afford most things ciies out for\ntoday and is refused.\nI am no prophet, but, had I a prophesying gift, I think\nI would risk a safe word about music.\nI would say that if you can bring music into the streets\ninto courtyards, into museums, into railway stations, into*\nevery place where crowds go and pass from, you can again\nand again rout scepticism, drunkenness and ill health. You\ncan get a long way towards solving half your troublesome\nmodern problems.\nBut you must do it cunningly, with great art.\nI will give you two examples, one bad, one good.\nMusic was introduced into a Museum one or two years\nago. I think it was in London at one of the South\nKensington Museums.\nHow was it introduced into this place of wandering\npassages and courtyards gemmed with delicious things to\nlook at and to stud}', before which hundreds pass along daily,\nlooking at them, and hundreds of others sit studying them ?\nThis is what happened. A closed room was put aside\nfor the music. Caspita I a closed room for this fairy, for\nthis thing born with wings which are even now not crushed.\nAnyone in the museum who happened to find cut that\nmusic could be heard there could go away from the silver\ncaskets, leave the golden frames and the tapestries and\nhear G concert!\nIncredible to me is such an innocence of the true nature\nof music *\nIs anything mere unpractical, when a world is sick for\nlack of a little first-aid, than the notice 44 First aid can be\nobtained by applying for a ticket (Price one shilling) and\nby going in search of the aid\nFirst aid has to be brought to the sick for the sick\ncannot even crawl to where it sits, if it squats in state for\nthe sake o an exaggerated good form.\nMy second example illustrates this.\nOutside and below my house by the sea winds a long\nuphill road. One day last year three men came along this\nroad. They were Russians or Poles or some kind of\nforeigners, and they carried an instrument apiece. They\nseemed to be artists—painters may be—and, walking from\ntown to town, they were going towards Roma.\nAs they came along they were playing a strange song\nof the north. I stopped in my work to listen ; and liste-\nning, I put dewn my pencil and rose up quickly and\nran to call the others. 44 Did you hear the music? \" 44 Yes,\nisn't it lovely\".\nIt was indeed very lovely. Nothing wonderful like\nStrauss or Debussy perhaps; nor like Beethoven ; but in\nthe open air and coming tcwards us, these strange wild\nnotes sounded perfectly lovely and there an end to ar-\ngument.\nI ran out into the garden and leaned over the wall;—\nthey had passed, and, getting fifty paces away, had come\nto the end of their delicious piece. And they stopped. They\ndid not talk or laugh.\nThey were a little weary with their walking I dare\nsay; and besides this, a man full of wine was coming from\nthe direction in which they were going, gesticulating and\nlurching and making those bursting blatant noises which\ncome from the drinkers who are less gay than gloomy.\nHe was addressing the heavens, and called on them to\nwitness to the misery that mankind and the government\nhad brought him to.\nAnd then this happened. The three young men with\nthe music, who had sat down by the roadside, stood up\narid went towards him surrounding him on three sides,\nhemming him in like three of Robin Hood's outlaws would\nonce have hemmed in some rich farmer. And before you\ncould count nine they had begun to play music. They\nplayed it around him, all over him and into him ; and,\nwill ycu believe me, he stopped dead still, uttered never a\nsound, stood steady and with head depressed and turned\non one side listening.\nThey played on for over five minutes. Then without\na word they passed on towards Roma. The drunkard\npassed my house leaving them : not a sound, not a stagger,\nno lurching.\nThe days of miracles are past I knew, but the day of\nmusic will never pass.\nWe stand in great need of music today. Is there no\none who will bring it to us?"}, {"page_pdf": 49, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.49", "texte": "PALAZZO BARBERINI.\nIn which was the Theatre built by Bernini.\nPlate 3.\n\nTHE MASK\ni 9 2 5"}, {"page_pdf": 51, "page_imprimee": "45", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.51", "texte": "A NOTE UPON\n\"THE MASK\".\nBY LENNOX ROBINSON.\nREPRINTED FROM\nTHE OBSERVER. LONDON.\nBELIEVING that many friends of \" The Mask \"\nof the New Movement in the Theatre will be interested\nin the following extract from an article by Mr Lennox\nRobinson published in \" The Observer \"9 London, on\nOctober 12th last, we reprint it, for those who may not\nhave seen it, by kind permission of the Editor of \" The\nObserver \", Mr /• L. Garvin.\n%\n44 THE BEST THEATRICAL MAGAZINE\no IN THE WORLD ' \\ o\nIT may seem an extraordinary thing to say, but 1 am\nalmost certain that Mr. Gordon Craig is the personage in\nthe English theatre to-day who most \" matters . True,\nin one sense he is not \"in \" the theatre at all; he pro-\nduces nothing, has no theatre of his own, makes a for-\ntune for no playwright, exploits no players, but, in spite\nof these things—or perhaps because of them—he looms\nwith a dreadful indistinct importance. No man in the\nEnglish theatre is so hated and reviled, no man so pas-\nsionately defended and revered.\n* *\nA man who can arouse such feelings of hatred and\nlove can indubitably be no nonentity. People do not\nguash their teeth and foam at the mouth over something\nthat does not matter, but foam and gnash the theatre\ndoes over Mr. Craig, and he evidently matters to a very\nintense degree. It is a little difficult to say just why\n(though it is easy to say that he is a genius, and that\ngenius always makes itself felt), and, turning over the\npages of the current number of \" The Mask\" I tried to\ndiscover what exactly was his secret, and why our attention\nis so arrested. For there is no doubt he does arrest it.\n45 The Mask \" is an amazing publication.\nI confess that, as a general rule, I am bored to extinc-\ntion by theatrical history and theatrical memoirs, and that\nit is almost inconceivable to myself . that I should find\nmyself reading with avidity of the plays witnessed by\nJohn Evelyn in London in the middle of the seventeenth\ncentury. Extracts from his diary, together with Mr. Craig's\ncomments thereon, fill a large portion of this \" Mask ,\nand I find myself reading every word greedily. Does my\ninterest spring from Mr. Craig's passionate, almost pathetic,\ninterest in the theatre, or is it awakened only by his own\nfine, vivid style ? But he has the faculty of inspiring\nothers. Every page of \" The Mask ' glows. Compared\nwith any other theatrical paper I know, it is as ginger-\nale long-opened is to champagne. This yellow magazine\nbubbles, is gay and provocative and sometimes perverse\nand absurd, but most often wise and serious, and at every\nmoment stimulating. It is as easy to imagine falling asleep\nat one's own execution as nodding over \" The Mask \".\nWhen I am feeling depressed I wonder whether there\nis any \" art \" of the theatre worth making a pother about,\nbut then the vision rises of this middle-aged Englishman\nin Florence (or is it in Rapallo ?) breaking his heart over\nit, and my spirits rise and I feel there must be something\nfor him to break his heart about. But his heart is very\nnearly broken. He knows it when, having dreamed of\nan interchange (\" not as propaganda, but to give delight \")\nof artists between the countries of the world, he cries out :\n\" I can see this because I am blind. But some one touches\nme on the shoulder as I write, and my pen slows down.\nAs though in a train that has stopped at no station,\nbut by some hedgerow; everyone popping heads out\nfrom the windows and having sensational moments. But\nthere is nothing really sensational: rather, a dull fact—the\nstoker is drunk; and what but intoxicated am I with this\nhope of what never was and what never will be ? \" And\nbecause we know that his heart is very nearly broken,\nwe continue to harry him and gibe him (though, as some-\none else in the magazine says with perfect ruth, he\nhas done nothing to interfere with our success in the\ntheatre), The quarry is panting, is very nearly down;\nif we can keep the hunt going a very little longer, he\nwill be only hound's meat. But 1 feel that Mr. Craig\nwould be the last person in the world to wish anyone to\nmake a poor mouth about him, and I content myself with\nsaying that if we have not given him a theatre he has\ngiven us the best theatrical magazine in the world.\n* October 1924.. Vol. 10 No. 4."}, {"page_pdf": 52, "page_imprimee": "46", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.52", "texte": "CORRESPONDENCE.\n\nTo the Editor of \"The Mask\".\nYours truly,\nA. E. DOBELL.\nDear Sir:\nRE 44 A Protest from an Actor \" in your issue for\nOctober. I hope to be abie to aliay the wrath of\n44 An English Actor , and vindicate the artist or artists\nresponsible for the three very interesting illustrations you\nhrave reproduced from any intention to insult the members\nof the Theatrical Professions.\nI have in my possession a number of Juvenile books\npublished by S. and J. Fuller, at the Temple of Fancy,\n1810 11, each of which contains a number of coloured\nprints similar to those you have reproduced. The prints\nare all headless as in your examples, but accompanying\neach set are, or should be, a detachable head and several\nhats which are made to fit in a slot at the back of the\nprint, so that the head and appropriate head-gear is easily\nattached to all the characters.\nI enclose, for reproduction, the 44 Character Harlequin \",\nwith the head in position. This is one of the Character\nfrom 44 Frank Feignwells Attempts to amuse his friends\non Twelrth Night, exhibited in a series of Characters\"\nLondon: printed for S. and J. Fuller, 1811.\nFour other titles in this series are Young Albert, the\nRoscius, Phoebe the Cottage Maid, exemplified in a series\nof rural figures. The History of Little Fanny. The History\nand Adventures of Little Henry.\n77 Charing Cross Road;\nLondon, W. C. 2.\nThe designs fondly sent by Mr Dobell would have\nbeen charming things to print; but the pictures for this\nquarter already exceed in number the usual allowance,\nand, added to this, they are in colour and would lose too\nmuch if translated into half-tone. But we thank him for\nhis timely information, and hope that, not only will our\nreaders be interested by it, as we ourselves are, but\nalso that \"An English Actor99 will be appeased. Ed.\n\n\"THE NEW THEATRE AND CINEMA OF\nSOVIET RUSSIA\"\n\nThe Editor of \"The Mask\".\nYours faithfully\nHUNTLY CARTER.\nSir :\nOF course my book, 44 The New Theatre and Cinema\nof Soviet Russia is well worth 52/-. My best\nthanks to Mr.. Gordon Craig for the suggestion. But as I\ndesire, as evidently Mr. Craig does, to produce a demand\nfor it let me say that its actual price is 25/-.\nWe thank Mr. Huntly Carter for his correction, and\nmuch regret that our printers, by reversing the 5 and the 2,\nmore than doubled the cost of his exceedingly cheap boofo\nreviewed on page /85 of our last number. But, as\nMr. Craig has nothing to do with the printers, we will\ntender the author s thanks to J. B., the reviewer; and to\nMr. Carter our apologies, for the error. Ed.\n\nFOREIGN NOTES.\n\nLONDON. WET WEMBLEY.\nJ. B.\n|N November, in one final downpour of rain, the Prince\ni of Wales, >in an excellent speech, closed the big Empire\nExhibition after what has been undoubtedly a great success.\nFinancial success is not the only success, and of course\nthe Exhibition has cost much more money than it took\nin. But the Nation, and its exhibitons at Wembley, will\nobviously win back far more than they will be able to\ncalculate. I hey will make money, and wonder why, and\nperhaps not attribute it to this big show. But it is the\nshow which will have done it all the same.\nAnd what of the rain ? The picture of thousands\nof soaking Londoners with umbrellas is possibly an endu-\nring sight.... would it be any less so had provision been\nmade to keep them dry?\nWe suggest that architects be allowed to control the\nbuilding of future exhibitions ; being practical people, ar-\nchitects know all about how to protect crowds of people\nfrom great rains and great heat. They employ the arch,\nthe arcade, and many devices to do this. A good architect\nalso makes a fine looking piece of work, and the Empire\nExhibition was not a fine looking piece of work.\nWe also suggest that our next Pageant be somehow\nmade rather more original, five or six times less vast, and\ncost a third of the sum.\nIt has surprised many people to learn that the Pa-\ngeant cost a sum of money sufficient to have given England\na couple of Theatres in which to house its Drama, which\nDrama they say is in a poor plight. If it be so, one of\nthe reasons would seem to be, that there is too much\nmoney in England, not too little. Yet how often do people\nwho, one would think, should know better, privately or\npublicly inform all of us who would like to see good\nthings well supported that there is no money.\nWhat a horrid fib!"}, {"page_pdf": 53, "page_imprimee": "47", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.53", "texte": "BOOK REVIEWS.\n\n/ PROFETI DI BABILONIA by\nG. F. Malipiero. Bottega di Poesia,\nMilano. Price 15 lire.\nTHIS Milanese Publishing Company\nproduces a quantity of books, some\nprinted very badly, and some excel-\nlently. It uses a poor sandy sort of\npaper without sufficient reason : for if\nthere is no perfect paper in Italy, young\nItalians could soon make some.\nIt is all nonsense nowadays\nto say there is no this, no that, with\nan awakened Italy easily able to make\neverything and make it perfectly.\nAnyhow, Signor Malipiero makes\nall he makes perfectly ; and this de-\nlightful book of scenes, letters, and\nextracts collected from 18th century\nwritings by Chiari, Carlo and Gaspare\nGozzi, Calsabigi, Affo, Algarotti, Ar-\nteaga, Metastasio, Milizia, and many\nothers, with an excellent preface and\nnotes by Malipiero himself, is as good\nas it could be.\nThe subject is the Theatre : they\nall speak of the Theatre of their time;\nand, as they are all serious men, the\ncollection is an important one, ....in\nsome ways the most important which\nexists.\nThe book consists of 438 pages of\nadmirable writing with one plate, is\nwell covered, distinguished in appearance,\nand costs only fifteen lire. It is, by\nthe way, dedicated to an Englishman.\nFourteen more books are announced\nia this series, 44 I Fascicoli Musicali \",\nof which this is the first.\nWe could do without a good half-\ndozen of them: for example, 44 Nerone\ndi Boifo \" by Guj ; 44 Opera and\nDrama \" by Wagner; 44 Falstaff di\nG. Verdi \" by della Corte ; 44 Beet-\nhoven \" by Rolland; and 44 Debussy\"\nby Perracchio. It is Italians, not Ger-\nmans and Frenchmen, we want to\nknow better.\nAs for Boito and Verdi, I some-\ntimes fee! that too much time has\nalready been devoted to these remar-\nkably famous composers.\nMore time given to telling us about\nthe lesser known composers and libret-\ntists and their assistants is what we\nlook for now. More about Pepoli,\nAlbergatti and Contarini, and their\nhouses and teatrini : more of Bibiena\nand his family, of the Galliari family,\nof the Mauri (or Mauro) family : of\nF. C. Motta, of Petronio Nanni, and\nRivani; of the singers and dancers\nwho are out-shaddowed today by the\neternal 4 4 return visit \" of Farinello\nand Cafarello.\nWhat of Sancta Stella, and Pi-\nstocci, what of architects like Sighizzi?\nHow is it that seemingly no book or\nbooklet exists telling us all about his\nservice to the Theatre ?\nI believe all these figures wait for\nSignor Malipiero to give them place\nand prominence, in a new book, for\nhe has a way of dealing with these\nfine things and people which does ho-\nnour to them.\n\nWOMAN IN WORLD HISTORY.\nHER PLACE IN THE GREAT\nRELIGIONS, by E. M. White.\nHerbert Jenkins. 8/6 net.\nWE dont quite like the title of the\nbook : ....however. Do we like\nthe book ? In it the author is stated\nto have 44 ransacked the ages and roam-\n\" ed the world to trace woman's\n44 influence in the story of civilization,\n44 with special* reference to the great\n44 religions, and to their effect on the\n44 position of womanhood. As the\n44 term religion has been taken in its\n44 broadest sense, it has included all\n44 the social and artistic spheres which\n44 each religion has touched, and thejre-\n44 fore the book covers nearly all the\n44 field of woman's hisjtory. The aim\n44 has been appreciation before criticism,\n44 and the conclusions reached are\n44 neither anti-man nor anti-feminist\nCertainly, in her 395 pages, Miss\nWhite gives us a great deal that is\ninteresting in regard to the life of\nwomen, from primitive times, and down\nthrough ancient Egypt, Babylonia and\nAssyria, through Hinduism, Buddhism,\nMahammedanism and Judaism, through\nancient Greece and Rome, and down\nfrom the beginning of the Christian Era\nto the present time : and her work is\nthe more useful because it is non-pole-\nmical : she has neither the frenzied\ndesire to prove that woman is at all\npoints the equal of man 44 only better\na desire, even if one which is never\nrealized,lhat characterizes certain ....too\ncertain.... feminist writers : nor has she\nthe inborn contempt for women which\ndetracts from the value of the writings\nof certain virulent anti-feminists. Her\nonly aim is to trace down through the\nages certain influences which reacted\nupon, and emanated from, one half of\nthe human species ; and the ways in\nwhich, in different periods, they rose\nto or lapsed from the fullest accom-\nplishment of their especial functions and\nprivileges as individuals and in relation\nto man and to the human family at\nlarge. It is not an unambitious aim,\nand we would recommend this book\nto the study of those who have often\ndisputed the conviction, now and again\nexpressed by writers in \" The Mask *\\\nthat women are not exactly in their\nright place upon the stage : they may\nlearn here that it was not any sign of\nthe belittlement of women by men, or\nof degradation, or undue weakness on\ntheir own part, when they preferred\nto hold their lives aloof from publicity,\nand especially from what a Russian\nauthor has called \"an amorous display'*\nbefore a public, for that spoilt public's\nentertainment.\nIt is a vexed question, I must\nadmit ; whether it be better to suffer\nthe slings and arrows, or to take arms\nagainst a sea ... and end the troubles.\nAnd I for one rather like to see\none role always acted by a woman :\nI refer to the part of \" Hamlet,...\"\nwith of course a man in the role of\nthe \" player queen\n\nMASKS AND DEMONS. K. Mac\nGowan and H. Rosse. Martin Hop-\nkjnson : London : 15/— net.\nWE already referred to this book\nin July 1924 when it reached us\nfrom its American publishers, Messrs\nHarcourt, Brace & Co ; we are glad\nnow to see that a English edition has\nappeared, and would recommend all\ntheatre students to secure a copy for\nthe sake of the large number of excel-\nlent illustrations it contains of masks\nof many nations, and the entertaining\ntext,\n\nRESTORATION COMEDY by\nBonamy Dohree. The Clarendon\nPress. Oxford. 6/— net.\nTHE Publishers announce that\"This\n44 book gives a general view of\n4 4 Comedy in the period from Etherege\n44 to Farquhar, and places certain aspects\n44 of Restoration Comedy in a new\n44 light. It investigates more thoroughly\n44 than has yet been done the vexed\n44 question of French influence, and\n44 proves by ample quotation that Res-\n44 toration Comedy was, in the main,\n48 a natural development of late Eliza-\n44 bethan work. But the principal"}, {"page_pdf": 54, "page_imprimee": "48", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.54", "texte": "41 content is a description and criticism\n44 of the work of the chief writers\n44 of the period, apart from any\n44 theory \".\nYes, and the whole thing is well\ndone; but where are the plays ?\nThis charming book of 182 pages\ngives us quite a number of passages\nfrom the plays, as though the author\nhad really felt as he went along that\nhe really couldn't continue to talk,\n(and talk so well) about them while\nwe, his hearers, were left utterly in the\ndark as to what he was talking about.\nSo he strikes a wax vesta now and\nagain and points to the pictures : 44 You\nsee what I mean \", he seems to say\nas he quotes a bit; at which out\ngoes the quotation, and we are again\nplunged in obscurity.\nThe fact is there are very few of\nus who know these plays well enough ;\nand I feel that Mr Dobree's ten chapters\nwould have been only in their right\nplace as prefaces to the plays of the\nsix authors on whom he discourses.\nWithout the plays the book is but\ndelightful meandering.\nOn page 138, for example, Mr Do-\nbree tells us that, 44 a thread of sadness\n44 and disillusion runs through these\n44 plays, and live passions break through\n44 the veil of cynicism wherewith the\n44 critical comedy clothes itself. We\n44 pierce through the social world to\n44 the realm of our underlying motives,\n44 to our ardours and desires, for beauty\n44 as well as for grosser satisfactions ;\n44 and Congreve reveals himself as a\n44 poet pleading for finer living \".\nWell, the thread of what you will\nmay run where it likes, but unless we\ncan be helped to follow it we are\nprone to grow a little sleepy.\nIt is of no use to say that we\nnierce through the social world \", and\nthat 44 Congreve reveals himself \", for,\nlacking the plays, no such blessed re-\nvelation can be ours.\nIn short, speech about a thing lacks\nall sanity without the hearers are first\ntold what it's all about and until they\ncan judge for themselves. A vague\nrecollection of Shakespeare is something\nto us when we come to read Coleridge\non his plays. And besides, we all\nhave a Shakespeare in the house. But\nwhen it comes to a play by Etherege\nand Shadwell, or even Congreve, unless\nthe play be in the same volume and\njoined to the discourse about it, we\nshall never be lured by the orator to\nread the play, to go out and hunt for\na copy, to buy the play or listen to the\norator; and it's quite likely we shall\ndamn the best orator and wonder why\nthe publisher didn't have enough faith\nso die Drama itself and had too much\nin the critic of it.\nIt is futile to hope that we shall\nbe sent by Mr Dobree to Eiherege,\nfor there is not time in 1925 for even\nthe average man to go trotting around ;\nand I for one will wager that very few\nof the exceptional men will have time\nto do so.\nBesides, there are too few and too\nexpensive Congreves and Ethereges in\nthe market. WANTED a shilling\nCongreve: ,.,.and for our part we\nwant that volume prefaced by Mr\nDobree.\nYes, there's something in it, isn't\nthere ?\n\nLIFE OF WILLIAM CONGREVE\nby Edmund Gosse C. B. Heinemann.\n7/6.\nMR Gosse is always gallant, and so\nhe was one of the earliest, if not\nthe very first, to write the Life of\nCongreve.\nHe might have written the life of\nEtheridge, but what would there have\nbeen gallant in such an act as that ?\nNo. Congreve the bore, that's the\nman to stand by, to prop up, force\nbefore the Public, stick to, and finally\ntriumph with.\nThat's the splendid English gallantry\nof it, and in Mr Gosse gallantry glows\nwith a steady flame.\nWhen I speak of Congreve as a\nbore, I only mean that he fails to be\nbrilliant like Etheridge or powerful like\nWycherley. He meanders, he has grace,\nhe is charming, .... he is, in fact, a\nperfect bore.\nWhat pains he is at to make no\nfaults, this perfect Congreve. But it\nis Mr Gosse and his book we have to\nconsider, and it seems to me as good\ntoday as it was when it first appeared\nsome years ago.\nWritten probably with great difficulty,\nit has about it all the signs of easy\nwriting.\nWhat is known of Congreve is ali\nthere, and what is known is really\nhardly worth recording.\nHow remarkable then that so great\nan impression has been made with this\nbook upon ali of us.\n\nTHE THEATRE: IDEAS AND\nIDEALS. J. W. H. Faulkner.\nA. Stockwell, London. 2/—.\nI wonder whether Mr Faulkner is\nquite correct in his statement that\n\" the first Theatre was built by the\nGreeks between three and four hundred\nyears before Christ M?\nI have an idea that theatres existed\nlong before that.\nAnd I wonder, is Mr Faulkner\ncorrect when he says that 44 An Exhi-\n44 bition of Paintings, a Concert, a\n44 Recital of Verses, a Display of Dan-\n44 cing.... none of these are entertain-\n44 ments \".\n1 wonder what he would call Po-\nlitics, as we receive them daily through\nthe newspaper. I, who am a theatre-\ngoer, rather resent seeing so much\ndrama made out of politics in our\nDaily Papers. It makes me quite bo-\nred when I go to hear a play.\nThe ideas and ideals set forth in\nthis little booklet of 32 pages are\nfreshly stated and familiar to us. The\nmore often they are repeated (provided\nanyone listens) the better for the London\nstage.\nUnfortunately in London hardly\nanyone has time to listen, except to\nhis own voice. What with having to\nget through a hard day's work, and\nhaving to sit through the wrong play\nat night, (for it's difficult to back a\nwinner each time), listening has to be\nput off until our August days at Mar-\ngate, when all we want to listen to\nthen is what are the tame waves saying.\nBut everyone belonging to the Bri-\ntish Drama League should assuredly\npurchase this two shillings's worth of\nIdeas and Ideals, and do their very\nbest to spread them through the length\nand breadth of the land.\nBut the first thing to do is to per-\nsuade people to listen,\n\nSMARAGDAS LOVER ; A Dra-\nmatic Phantasmagaria by W. /. Tur-\nner. Chatto & Windus. 5/-\nMR W. J, Turner has a very\nstrong, a very genuine sense of\nthe Theatre. It is needless to tell\nhim he avoids coming to the ordinary\nHecuba or to warn him not to be\ntempted away by unrealities, for it is\njust by wandering exactly where he\nwanders that he will come across the\nreal lady, There will then be no\ndoubt at all what Hecuba is to him\nand he to Hecuba. Shell be right\nthere, tragic or comic as he wills.\nMeantime, spite of this essential gift\nof his, he has not come across her\nthis time. But he is almost there.\nThis is not a little to be able to\nsay. For he hasn't been looking for\nher in any of the places she long\nago left.\nHis Phantasmagoria is a wierd and\nenchanting comedy which I think the\nEnglish actors of our day could make very\nlittle out of. When you have read it, if"}, {"page_pdf": 55, "page_imprimee": "49", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.55", "texte": "you have an eye to its exploitation on the\nmodern stage, you more than likely close\nthe volume with the word 44 unsatis-\nfactory \" but what else can a thing\nof this kind be ? is not a Phantasma-\ngoria 44 a crowd or succession of dim\nor doubtfully real figures \" ?\nIn any event it is good reading for\nit moves along and without effort, so\nlong as one remembers that nothing is\nquite real. Sometimes it exceeds even\nunreality, not only in the situations but\nin the very speeches, as, for example,\nwhen the Prime Minister in the play\nsays of Sir Leo Edward Meyer,\n44 Extraordinary people these Jews!\nAll the world s shadiest transactions\nare done in their houses but never\nby them \".\nAgain i come to the principal de-\nfect in all plays, and that is not any\nfault committed by the authors. This\ndefect is that we are fast asleep in\nEngland so far as our Theatre is con-\ncerned. Proof: This.... Were we awake\nwe would of course produce this drama\nwithin the month; and the same au-\nthor's 44 Popomac \" play would have\ncome (come and gone, or come and\nstayed) at least a year ago.\nBut no, we are asleep. And how\nwe dream, to be sure. We dream\nthat by selecting what we think to be\nexcellent plays made in the right way\nwe may get at last at the plays.\nGloriously comic, crazy, dream. We\nshall get at last at the plays if we\nproduce without any pausing or any\nsilly sort of superior hesitation, every\nplay which every writer of even fair\ntalent, has the courage to pen.\nWe shall produce them cheaply,\nrapidly and well. It is quite easy to\ndo it cheaply and well provided you're\nrapid about it.\nWe shall thus put upon the stage\nmany hundreds of new plays each year,\nthree or four of which will prove\ntheir worth, thirty, or forty their promise,\nand some hundreds will pass away.\nWe (sleeping) dream that we can\nbe cleverer than that. Utter delu-\nsion.\nIn any case I hope Mr Turner\nwill write and publish every play that\nhe has even the faintest desire to write\nand publish, even if the London stage\nis not yet awake: for we want to see\nall that he has in his imagination;\ntechnically we see what he might do\nshould he wish to; but if the Theatre\nwill go on dreaming he cannot exactly\nexercise that wish to any great extent.\nThe English stage is in the condi-\ntion it was in years ago, Men of ta-\nlent exist who should be given Thea-\ntres so as to wake it up. Till it wakes\nup the work of thousands of writers,\nactors, producers, will be wasted, and\nI do not believe England can afford\nto waste in this manner, I wont call it\nshameful; it is merely excessively stupid\n\nA GUIDE TO CAPER by Thomas\nBodkin and Denis Eden. (Chatto &\nWindus). 5 shillings.\nC.\nAT'OU follow the pictures, not the\ntext, of this Guide,... if you want\nto get there: but the text helps.\nIt's the best five shillings* worth I\nhave seen for many a day. Mr Eden\nis a new name to us, but there is no-\nthing at all of the beginner about his\nwork.\nThe second picture, the last picture,\nthe ninth, tenth and eleventh pictures\nall play with light. If the sun is down\nthe moon shines; or a fire, or the stars\ntwinkle, and it is this light which gives\nus so much happiness when we look\nat these inhabitants of Caper, living the\nmost sensible existence man could ever\nlive, even after thinking about it for\nyears.\nI am an entire admirer of this ar-\ntist. I have nothing to find fault\nwith,... the whole thing is perfect.\nAnd not the least perfect thing about\nit is Messrs Chatto & Windus's ins-\ntinct or judgement, in having recogni-\nzed in Mr Eden an artist of first class\nfancy. Just as courtesy is in every\ntouch, so is there courtesy in the way\nit has been brought out.\nCharm is a word which extends to\nhoydens, Mrs Jordan was charming\nThis book is more than that.... and\nthe way it has been issued by the\npublishers, its paper, its covers, wrap-\nper, title page and all, reveals an un-\nderstanding for which I can find no\nbetter word than courtesy. If ten\nthousand copies be not sold quite soon\nI shall be very much surprised.\n\nTHE SLEEPING BEAUTY by\nEdith Sitwell. Duckworth. 5/- net.\nA poem of 96 pages is an achieve-\nment. I suppose Miss Sitwell a\nlover of the more eleborate drawings\nby Aubrey Beardsley.\nNever having read anything of hers\nbefore this is my impression.\nFirst that there are seasons and\nseasons for poems. I feel that this\none came out in the wrong season.\nI am in a cold room as I read this\npoem, and I wonder why it does not\ngo easily. Not Miss Sitwell's fault, but\nmine to be so placed twixt the cold and\nthis deep sea.\nObviously Miss Sitwell is full of\ngifts, clever, a poet, ....a graceful one;\nand with an ability to go on.\nAs I read it I find myself unable\nto believe that the Sleeping Beauty is\na theme any poet could make anything\nmore out of than has Miss Sit well.\n\nJUDAS. A Tragedy in Three Acts\nby Claude Houghton. 7he Four Sees\nCo. Boston. 2.00.\nI do not think that everyone and\nanyone should be at liberty to take\nup a pen and write tragedies in three\nacts or in four.\nIf they do so, and fail to write\nwell, I see no reason why they should\never do it again.\nMr Houghton has done ill, and I\nhope his next will be free from all\nthat I find in this play.\n\nTHYREA AND OTHER SON-\nNETS by John Ferguson. Andrew\nMelrose, Ltd. 1/6 net.\nTHIS little book of Sonnets, reprin-\nted from the 44 English Review\n44 Irish Monthly \" and other papers,\nis in its second edition. 1he theme\nof a large number of the sonnets is\nderived from theatre life and experien-\nces. It has an introduction by Mr.\nW. L. Courtney who writes 44 Here is\na booklet of sonnets which I can warm-\nly commend to the judicious reader \".\nI transmit his message to the readers\nof 44 The Mask \".\n\nBOOK NOTES.\n\nHERE in Italy much Theatre litera-\nture is continually published.\nAn interesting article on the work\nof Gordon Craig by Henry Furst ap-\npeared in \" II Piccolo * lately.\nAnother appeared on the same\nsubject in \" Comoedia \" for November\n10th, which is issued in Milano. The\narticle was written by A. Nasaili Rocca,\nwho contributed an article on the old\nTheatres of Piacenza to the October\nnumber of \" The Mask .\n\" Comoedia \" often contains inte-\nresting items. It is published by Mon-\ndadori, (Galleria Vittorio Emanuele 74)\nMilano, and edited by Umberto Frac-\nchia, a young writer of talent and\nexperience.\nO\n\nPITY THE POOR PLAY WRITER.\n44 The average fee for a three act\nplay is five pounds per performance .\nMonica Ewer, in\n44 Play Production for Everyone \"."}, {"page_pdf": 56, "page_imprimee": "50", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.56", "texte": "EDITORIAL NOTES.\n\nTHE ITALIAN THEATRE.\nTHE old Italian Theatre, and by\nthat we mean its professional Thea-\ntre as it is today, pleases us so much\nthat, unless very fine innovations are\nmade, we would respectfully suggest\nthat it is perhaps better for the Ita-\nlians to avoid novelties.\nTheir Theatre is not the first in\nEurope because of the elegance and\ncomfort of its poltrone and its palchi\n(there England and America lead),\nnor because scenographically it is suf-\nficient, or because it is developing a\nnew group of excellent playwrights.\nIt is first by virtue of its first-class\nacting and singing, because acting and\nsinging come to Italians apparently with\nimmense ease ....not because of any\ncleverness, which after all is a very\nsmall thing at best.\nFirst they have a language; they\nknow how to speak it : they never\nmumble, drawl, are never foggy; all\nis crisp, deliberate, and rapid. They\nknow how to carry themselves ; they\nare born professionals; they 44 act\nthey do not pretend to deceive us\nthat they are 44 real \".\nYet while acting they never play at\n44 make believe \" ; they do not imi-\ntate toy soldiers and fashion plates and\nstatuary. While they are never unreal\nin that sense, 44 Realism \" has never\nbeen thinkable to them, for they know\nwhat is what, and find Realism as\nlaughable as they find forced arti-\nficiality depressing.\nThis it is which we think places\nall Italian actors in another sphere to\nthe actors of Russia, who are born\n*\nrealists and deuced serious about it all,\nor born copyists of statuary, engra-\nvings, wooden toys and the like. Ita-\nlian actors are not like German actors,\nwho are always earnest and clever but\nnever quite the thing. Certainly En-\nglish actors are the most gentlemanly\nin Europe; and French actors, ever\nthe neatest; but Italian actors are ac-\ntors before Abraham was,\nSo that when nowadays innovations\nare made in the way that the 44 Indepen-\ndenti the 44 Tetiteairo \" or T6thys-\nTheatre make them, or as Signor Bra-\ngaglia makes them, we regret to say\nthat they ring false. The 44 innovators \"\ndo nothing original.\nIt is all what we call rather cheap.\nWe have seen the designs for the\nnew 44 Teatro del Convegno \" and it\nstrikes us they are curiously poor.\nIf Italy possessed the knack for imi-\ntating northern nations, it would not\nhave waited twenty years to seize on\nthe notion used- now as an inn vation\nfor the new stage of the 44 Teatro del\nConvegno \".\nThe 44 Piccola Canobbiana \" de-\nsigns for stage machines and audito-\nrium and proscenium are no better.\nSironi's designs for 44 I cavalieri \"\nare influenced by northern notions but\nare not at all good.\nAs for Signor Bragaglia, he has\nmuch excellent energy, little judgment\nand no originality. He catches hold\nof all the notions he can find in the\nbooks of the last twenty-five years,\nand on a small stage he manages to\nhuddle them all together, bringing out\nmuch printed matter to announce their\nexistence. The whole effect is that of\na mis-fit. Of course he does not\nadmit where he has gathered most of\nthese notions : he seems to think that\nthey are public property. By thus using\nthem he becomes one of the public.\nWe don't like it a bit. Signor Bra-\ngaglia can, we feel sure, do better, ....or\ndo less. It's not at all worthy of the\nimmense tradition of the Italian stage.\nItalians have imagination, have always\nhad it. So that to echo and to copy\nis, in an Italian, very poor, and in no\nway represents the new spirit which\nhas inspired Italy to stand on its own\nmerits in all things, and which seems\nto possess enough force to last out the\ncenturies.\nThe Facist Theatre, when it comes,\nwill be one of the blossoms of this\nNew Italy which today has no time\nto turn to thoughts of blossoming, since\nits sole thought is the natural one, ....that\nof spreading roots.\nPlenty of time for the arts later on.\nInevitably those arts will blossom in\ntime. Meanwhile these sad attempts\nto 44 innovate \" in the grand Italian\ntheatre are rather ridiculous; and the\nnotion that the Italian spectators, are\ntaken in cannot be maintained for a\nmoment.\n\nA POET'S THEATRE.\nMR John Masefield has built him-\nself a theatre at Boar's Hill, near\nOxford.\n\" What ridiculous nonsense \" is the\nverdict of those folk who cannot al-\nlow that a Theatre may be other than\nthe swagger Teatro Fenice in Venezia\nor the Prinz Regenten in Munchen.\nAs though Selva and Semper (or\nwhoever built the Wagner Theatre)\nare to be the only model husbandmen.\nWho knows better than a Dramatic\npoet what kind of Theatre is suited to his\nplays ? We understand that the Poetic\nDrama by several poets will be presented\nby Mr Masefield at his playhouse, which\nis a simply constructed building in his\ngarden, and is designed to accommodate\nabout one hundred persons. A first\nproduction has been already given, and\nafter Christmas it is hoped that an Eliza-\nbethan comedy may be produced. The\nstage is broad and sceneries are not\ngoing to be allowed to be a nuisance.\nOne London paper was cruel enough\nto say that 44 artistic curtains \" would\nbe used in place of the sceneries. As\na matter of fact we believe that Mr\nMasefield has around him a group of\ndisciples, not studying how to write,\nbut helping Mr Masefield how to play\nat theatres.\nAnd in our. opinion to play at Thea-\ntres in England is the very best thing\none could possibly do. And if in the\ncountry, the country wvay of doing this\nis ihe right way. That is why we\nutterly disbelieve the shocking suggestion\nof 44 artistic curtains Country thatch\ncountry wattles, country oak planks,,.,\nany of these as a background if you\nlike; there is danger in 44 artistic curtains \"\nthey are apt to catch fire. But then this\nwould assuredly bring Mr Masefield's\nplayhouse all the advertisement from\nwhich we think a country theatre should\nbe entirely exempt, but which the prac-\ntical man, even if he be in the desert,\nthinks is necessary.\nThe unfortunate fate of too many\na country playhouse is that it becomes\nthrough advertisement, just what the\npoet would hate it to be, ....what the\npoet never for a moment suspected it\nwas being lured to be; that is to say,\na bit of a sensation.\nWe recall the fate of several coun-\ntry, or semi-rural, playhouses, Before a\nyear was out someone (assuredly not\nthe Poet) had been over-energetic;\n(that 4 practical * person over again) it\nhad been dragged or pushed up to\nLondon, where it played a while and\nwent out, puff, like a lamp.\nWhy, after having chosen a noble\nrural spot as the place of places for\na Theatre, a dash should be made at\nthe first chance for London, is puzzling.\nGoethe, who played with Theatres,\nplayed with a real playhouse ....in\nWeimar.... with a Court as well as"}, {"page_pdf": 57, "page_imprimee": "51", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.57", "texte": "the towns-people as spectators. He\nworked hard at this playhouse of his,\nand it was even less than the poodle\nyou will remember which caused his\ndownfall as Theatre Director. It was\neven Fraulein Caroline Jagemann.\nAnd there have been other poets who\nfor a time have had little playhouses.\nVoltaire had one at Ferney. Here,\nabout 1776, Lekain stopped for some\ndays to perform to a select and ap-\npreciative audience. At Cirey, too,\nVoltaire had a playhouse of his own :\nand some years earlier had one in his\nvilla at Vernier, but we never hear of\nhim suddenly carrying his charming if\namateur troupe to Paris or Berlin.\nWe have not seen any drawings or\nengravings of these Theatres, but in\n1772, (about the time of the Ver-\nnier theatricals) it was customary to\nbe too magnificent rather than too\nsimple. The playhouse was a word\nwhich stood for something with style,\na sparkle of swagger in it. The poet\nAlbergatti liked things to look well-\ndressed, and so his theatre in Zola\nnear Bologna was the very thing. A\nlittle bit of a village this same Zola,\nbut then a big piece of a Chateau,\nand in the Chateau some Teatrino\nas Mr Stein would say, to seat three\nhundred people. And the poet Pe-\npoli.... how many theatres he built in\nhis houses in Venezia and Bologna\nand in his villas at Codalunga and\nelsewhere has net yet been decided.\nBut it is on record that he not only\nhad his own plays and those of other\npoets performed in them, but also\noperas in prose and ballets, in which\nPepoli danced, 44 the best dancer of\nthem all \" says the historian.\nBut of all private country theatres\nthat at Esterhaz, where Haydn lived\nfor many years writing his divine things\nfor the only quite divine performers....\nfor marionnettes.... is the country thea-\ntre we like to think of most. Haydn\nand Masefieid would have got on well\ntogether, we believe. What a pity\nthat the old Count Esterhazy of those\ndays is no more among us to show us\nall how.... exactly how.... a country\ntheatre should be set before the King :\n—or rather before himself and his\nhousehold. But as he is not with us,\nand as no lord seems to have retained\nthe old tricks that lords once played,\nwe must be content when a poet or\nany other artist rigs out a theatre for\nhimself. It's not the thing to do;...\n' Art for Art's sake' is no fun at all;\nand theatre for theatre's even less: but\nwhat would you ?... when a poet is\nat the same time a grand Signore he\ncan do these things as some of us\nthink they should be done ; when he\nhas only his crown of laurels, even if\nhe do them better, he cannot do them\nas they should be done.\nMr Masefieid will do them like a sim-\nple English poet, and that means he will\ndo them just as well as they can pos-\nsibly be done ; and those of us who\ncannot be there, will feel envious of those\nwho can, and who will hear beautiful\nverse spoken as it should be spoken.\nSee plate 2 and Page 35 for some\nidea of what a little private Theatre\nmeant in the 28th centmy, Ed.\n\nVALUELESS NEWS.\nTHE Observer in its issue for No-\nvember 2nd. had an exceptionally\nfunny twenty-five lines about a Berlin\nTheatre. Here it is : —\nEVEN BERLIN SHOCKED.\nTHE DRAMATIC THE A TRE\nCOMES TO GRIEF.\nThe movement of a few enthu-\nsiasts to help forward the great band\nof unacted dramatists has received a\ncrushing blow. The new \" Dramatic\nTheatre \", which opened with every\nencouragement from the critics, and\nwhich produced George Kaiser's (t Bil-\nles and Jeanne \" as its first venture,\nhas since alienated every type of au-\ndience by a succession of extravagant\nplays violating all canons of good\ntaste even in so exceptionally broad-\n-minded a city as Berlin.\nThe result is a triumph for the\nwatchful Clerical Centre party, whose\nmembers have their own theatre league,\nbut needed their own house. While\nthe Social-Democrats support their own\nexcellent '' People's Theatre *which\ncarefully avoids plays of reactionary\ntendency, the tf Dramatic Theatre \"\nhas now become the home of the po-\nlitical Catholics, whose taste in drama\nis characterised not so much by pro-\npaganda as by elimination. This rules\nout, for instance, not only three-cor-\nnered problems, but divorce in its\nentirety. This is a triumph for the\nideals of the Centre, which would pass\nunnoticed in a Catholic province, but\nis a sign of its renewed activity in\nBerlin.\nq What foolery and what cliches !\nReally, it is time to ask even this\nwell-nigh perfect journal to make a\nscrap of its Foreign Theatre Correspon-\ndents and start afresh.\nFor some time we have studied\ncarefully the theatrical news sent to\n44 The Observer \" from Wien, Berlin,\nand Budapest; and have wondered how\nlong Mr Garvin would let it go on.\nWhy is foreign theatrical news\nnecesary to 44 The Observer unless\nit be either very entertaining or very\ninforming ?\nWe suppose that the only people\nwho feel the necessity are those who\nare ever active in informing London\nthat the North European Theatre is\nquite the most important upon earth.\nHundreds of English actors doubt-\nless read 44 The Observer \", but they\nwill surely not be impressed by the\nnonsense which week after week is\nsent from Wien, Berlin and Pest.\nFor example what the dickens is\nthere of interest in this twaddle from\nBerlin about some Theatre which is\n44 the home of the political Catholics \"\nand \" whose taste is characterised by\nelimination \" ? And how comes it that\nthis or any taste 44 rules out \" divorce\nin its entirety, and how is this 44 a\ntriumph for the ideals of the Centre \" ?\nAnd then, 44 Catholic province 44 re-\nnewed activity 44 watchful clerical\ncentre party \", 44 broadminded city of\nBerlin\".—Really, 44 Observer \" ! you\nwho are the very pride of journalism\nand our delight, to accept such Pro-\npaganda from the Theatre of Elimi-\nnation in Berlin is not what you came\ninto existence to do. To hear from\nWien or Budapest that an audience\nhas sat spellbound, or that one could\nhave heard a pin drop, hardly carries\nas far as London.\nBesides, what Austria and Germany\ndo in Theatres is not half as important\nas the good 44 Observer\" seems to\nthink. If there is space that needs fill-\ning, we know of a good number of peo-\nple who could make that space glitter.\nThere is much being done in the\nEuropean and American Theatre week\nby week; but, strange as this may\nsound to some ears, it is not always\nto be found inside a playhouse.\nFor example, a book now and\nagain appears which does more to\nadvance the European Theatre than\ntwo years of energetic acting and pro-\nducing will do. Yet we hear nothing\nof this book,... or next to nothing. A\nfoolish conference is held, and it is re-\nported gravely. Or a new society for-\nmed, and reported as gravely. No dis-\ncernment is shown by the reports\ntwixt what is of value and what worth-\nless. This is a pity and a great waste\nof valuable space, time and money.\n11 Observer n will pardon this pre-\nsumption from the smallest serious paper\non earth to the largest and most im-\nportant;... but it is w The Mask's *\nspeciality, this little matter of Thea-\ntres. Like all specialists it thinks it\nknows. Who knows,... perhaps it may."}, {"page_pdf": 58, "page_imprimee": "52", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.58", "texte": "VENEZIA AND PROGRESS.\nTO judge from some recent articles\nin 44 The Manchester Guardian **\nand 44 The Daily Telegraph \" people\ndo not seem to realize in England that\nItaly is not a Museum or a Theatre,\nand that its Cities, however superb,\nhave no wish to crumble just to oblige\nthe tourists and the archeologists.\nItaly looks on it that life comes\nfirst, and all the rest comes after.\nAnd if electric motors are to be\nof any aid towards bringing to life\npart of Venezia or of any other city in\nItaly, what sort of being is it that will\ncry out about this? Venezia and the\ncities of Italy are not for him, they\nare for those who live and work and\ndie there.\n44 The Mask \" is all for the Arts.\nYou know that, we think. But only\nfor Art which comes along because a\npeople is alive. When a city is dead,\na nation drugged, a continent dulled,\nArt had better wait awhile in that\ncity, nation or continent.\nTrue, perhaps, that around some\ncities (did the Italian nation wish it)\na wall or a line might be drawn with\norders given that it was too good an\nexample of ancient work to be dis-\nturbed. Such a place might be roped\noff and put apart as a National Mo-\nnument, and outside its walls a new\ncity built. Inside its walls the very\nplainest but cleanest accommodation\nmight be provided for all who wished\nto study and work there in the monu-\nment, as in a vast Biblioteca, and\nspecial permissions granted to such on\nthat understanding. We have often\nfelt that cities like Venezia or San Gi-\nmignano might well be reserved for\nsuch a purpose.\nBut if the cities must be used, and\nmust be brought up to date, why not?\nWhere is Shakespeare's, Bacon's and\nElizabeth's London ? Has the loss of\nthat particular place (and lost it is)\nbeen no gain ? And if Titian's, Tie-\npolo's and the Doges* Venezia should\npass, where would be the loss ? To\nus, yes; to you, yes, to many thou-\nsands yes, ....but to many millions,\nprobably no. What use in architecture\nfor which the millions of people have no\ncare, which new laws no longer love ?\nGondolas are pretty boats, and to\nglide is sometimes a pleasant necessity,\nand a canal is not always as bad as\nit seems. But, since Shakespeare's Plays\nare not valued by us, Englishmen had\nbetter, we think, pause before too has-\ntily criticizing their Venetian friends.\nHow comes it that we English\ncriticize ?\nIs it just because we somehow be-\nlieve Venezia to belong to us, ....to be\nour honeymoon spot, our playground.\nAnd what are we ? a nation of\npeople more forward than any in prai-\nsing speed, electricity, cinema, liste-\nning-in ; ....and we quickly produce a\nmillion pounds if promised a safe in-\nvestment in something up-to-date and\na curse to everyone.\nIn Manchester we weakly give over\na poor cheap little National Theatre\nto a Cinema firm : with a lot of word\nprotest yet without real resistence, we\nyield it up; yet we have the audacity\nto tell Venezia from Manchester to keep\nitself unspotted from the monopoly for\nthe supply of motors.\nPrivate enterprise could have saved\nfor Manchester its Theatre Royal; and\nhad the 44 Manchester Guardian \" spo-\nken with the spirit it so often shows\nin other matters, (ie, in money matters)\nno commonplace motor-driven cinema\ncould have come into the Theatre\nRoyal.\nWhen Manchester can save one\nTheatre, and a grand old place like the\nTheatre Royal, it will be quite time\nenough for Manchester to lecture Ve-\nnezia.\n\nAS OTHERS SEE ....LONDON.\nJ. S.\nCAN anyone tell us what caused\nSir Alfred Butt or the Drury\nLane Committee to piace Mr Basil\nDean at the head of Drury Lane\nTheatre ?\nAccording to George Jean Nathan\nof New York, Dean would seem to\nbe a man of very- small talent, as\nthe following passage from an article\nin 44 The American Mercury \" will\nshow. Dean has been over in New\nYork producing plays. We want to\nsee a man put into Drury Lane who\nhas no time to go to New York or\nNewhaven to produce anything.\nNathan says that 44 It is not James\n44 Elroy Flecker's 44 Hassan \" that has\n44 failed, it is Mr Basil Dean's. Flecker\n44 wrote a play rich in the music of\n44 romance and poesy, as beautiful a\n44 thing of its kind as has appeared\n44 in recent dramatic literature; Dean\n44 staged it with all the imagination\n44 and rhythm of a sailor's smoker.\n44 The production, indeed, served as a\n44 piquant example of the low level to\n44 which the English stage, in this\n44 respect, has sunk. Dean is regarded\n44 as one of the best and most artistic\n44 of London producers, Over here,\n44 they do finer work up alleys.\n44 I have passed an eye over seven\n44 or eight of Dean's productions, three\n44 in New York and the others in\n44 England. All of them have been\n44 drolly incompetent. Not only has\n44 the gentleman apparently no sense of\n44 the dramatic, not only is he seeming-\n44 ly quite innocent of the technic of\n44 projecting a manuscript over the\n44 footlights, but he is, to boot, utterly\n44 without a sense of beauty and a\n44 sense of form. His ideas of scenic\n44 investiture go back to the day when\n44 furniture was painted on the back-\n44 drop and when a 4 big production *\n44 was any one in which the stage\n44 was so packed and crowded with\n44 scenery and irrelevant but costly\n44 props that the actors had to make\n44 their entrances from the wings side-\n44 ways. His ideas of lighting are so\n44 absurdly antiquated that even some\n44 of the most patriotic London re-\n44 viewers have difficulty in concealing\n44 their derisory hiccups. For Dean\n44 appears to believe that all that is\n44 necessary to achieve some exception-\n44 ally nobby illumination effects are\n44 a half dozen vari coloured gelatine\n44 slides supplemented by an indefati-\n44 gable fellow stationed at the dimmer.\n44 He sought to evolve mystery with\n44 a mere blue light and romance with\n44 a pink one. In the matter of dra-\n44 matic suggestion, he was equally\n44 unhappy. His scenes of melodrama\n44 were painstakingly languid ; his scenes\n44 of physical passion, as, for exam-\n44 pie, the one wherein the fair Yasmin\n44 conquers the flesh of Hassan, were\n44 as sexual as playing postoffice.\n44 Thus was a beautiful poem with\n44 its beautiful incidental music of Fre-\n44 derick Delius and with all its poten-\n44 tial stage wonder reduced to no-\n44 thing \".\nThis comes of being possessed of an\nability to push into Drury Lane with-\nout credentials. This comes of dis-\nhonest theatrical Criticism.\nLondon is slowly being made a\nlaughing stock by this sort of thing,\nand it is time the London Press said\nso clearly.\nUnfortunately Walkley, Archer,\nGrein and a few others do nothing to\nimprove matters. They either are cy-\nnical about our stage or gush about\nits worst elements. Not that Walkley\nor Archer err about playwrights; but\nto Theatricals they are sense-blind.\nGrein is not blind; he is merely ut-\nterly unfitted for a responsible positiou\nas a critic of our English Theatre.\n\nAll Rights reserved\\ January 1925*\nGerente responsabile Antonio Mctrainu\nTipografia Giuntina, Firenze,"}, {"page_pdf": 59, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.59", "texte": "THE MASK\n1908^^^^!925\n\nON A DESIGN BY SANGALLO\nAN INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM.\n\nIN our last two Symposiums we invited the Actors, Managers and\nCritics to the table. This time we invite the Architects, Designers\nand Scholars.\nThey are more bashful and so respond with rather less rapidity\nthan did the performers and the critics. But we believe that the few\nanswers will prove of considerable interest to our readers, all of whom\ncan suggest solutions to the difficult problem for themselves.\nWe think that most of the writers have come to a solution\nbut for us the matter still remains unsolved.\nA PRELIMINARY NOTE ABOUT THE DESIGN.\nTHIS design is by Antonio San Gallo the Younger (1485-1546) and is\nreproduced for the first time from the original drawing in the Uffizi Library\nin Firenze.\nI It is for a Theatre, showing the stage, scene and spectators seats.\nThe special thing which has concerned the artist is a revolving triangular scene for\neach side of the stage.\nWhat exactly was this scene to do or what it do. It looks to us like\na bit of a puzzle, and for this reason interesting.\nWas the triangular scene raised up above the ospitii or rooms ? Was it behind\nthem ? If behind, where did it show ?"}, {"page_pdf": 60, "page_imprimee": "152", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.60", "texte": "Was the front side of the Ospitii a transparency ?\nOr was there hung a square of cloth in front of the two top portions of the\nospitii which, when raised, revealed which ever side of the triangle was turned to\nfit the opening left exposed ?\nThe square opening indicated on the left side of the scene suggests the later notion.\nThe date of the drawing, about 1515 to 1530, makes it worth while studying.\nFor Palladio was but born in 1518 dying in 1580 and did not erect his\nfirst stage until 1565, and not till 1 545 did Serlio's second Book of Architecture appear\nwith its scenic section : only in 1 539 did he build his wooden Theatre in Vicenza.\nThis San Gallo (for there were six in all) is supposed to have assisted Raf-\nfaello and Bramante, both of whom concerned themselves with the questions of scenes,\nmachines and stages. Is this perhaps some record of Raffaello's work in Rome ?\nAmong San Gallo's contemporaries in scenic work were Peruzzi, Aristotile,\nGenga and Pericoli.\nVitruvio's book had appeared for the first time about 1486—one year after\nSan Gallo's birth : so this is an early document. Miss Campbell in her admirable\nbook \" Scenes and Machines \" (1923) does not mention it or its designer.\nScholars and artists will note several interesting points besides the two revolving\ntriangular scenes.\nWE therefore put the following questions :\n1. How were these triangular side scenes used ?\n2. Can anyone say for what play ?\n3. Were there but three scenes on each triangle or were others attached as\nthe play progressed,—ie. a new one for each \" ascione \" or \"action\" or scene?\n4. Is this the artist's sketch for work to be done, or is it a record by the artist\nof work he had seen done ?\nBesides answers to these questions we invited any additional information or\nsupposition no matter how extravagant. Without dashing in with a guess or two,\nhow arrive at any solution of what seems to be one of the most interesting\nexamples of the use of triangular side scenes.\nWE also felt it would be of interest to other students if one or two answers could be\ngiven on the following points :—\n(IB) What were the ospiiii and why so called ?\n(2B) Why was the place for the spectators called Teatro and not the whole building?\n(3B) What is the foro and why on the plan does it take such space? How was it!\nused ?\n(4B) Have we aula regia correctly translated ? was it a fixed scene fit for tragedy ? —\nor what was it ?\nTHE ANSWERS.\nBRUNO BRUNELL1. (Cortina d'Ampezzo).\n1. I hold that the triangular \"machine \"\n~~ geared behind the \" ospitii \" through an\nrture which was opened every time the\nHb. \\\naction required it, as appears from the perspec-\ntive drawing of the stage right hand side. The\nposition in which the \" macchina \" appears\non the left side must be a schematic simpli-\nfication to make plain, by means of the draw-\n\nJ. S."}, {"page_pdf": 61, "page_imprimee": "153", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.61", "texte": "ing, where it was to be inserted: it must\nhave been supported by a pivot at the height\nof the first piano of the \" ospitii \". It cor-\nresponds in this sense also with the other de-\nsign in the ground-plan, at the left side of\nthe stage (a triangle set in a square).\n2. 1 believe it is impossible. At the\nvery most the indication of the \" aula regia \"\nmay lead us to presume that it served for a\ntragedy.\n3. It is probable that only three scenes\nwere painted, as it is indicated that the\n\" macchina \" served for each \" ascione \" or\nscene.\n4. The notes which accompany the de-\nsign lead rather to the supposition that these\nwere jottings made by Sangallo subsequent\nto some performance at which he had been\npresent.\nIB. The \" ospitii \" seem here like small\nstages ( palcoscenici) upon which took place\nazioni complimentary to the principal azione ;\nperhaps allegorical azioni. Elsev/here, on\nthe contrary, (for example in the illustrations\nof an edition of Terenzio which 1 have in\nmy library, but have not the possibility of\nconsulting here) they appear rather as pal-\nchetti, platforms, reserved for honoured guests.\n2B. The \" aula regia \" in tragic plays\nwas the part of the stage reserved to the\npersonages of royal lineage : it is also a remin-\nder of the Greek theatre, which had the\nporta regia in the permanent scene—a thing\nwhich the classic theatre often reproduced\namong us ; (see the Teatro Olimpico).\nThe back of the stage was, on the con-\ntrary, reserved for the populace, and the\nrepresentation for which this stage served left\nevidently a large part to the masses.\nJOHN MASEFIELD. (OxfoTd).\n1. They revolved upon some central pole,\nlike the merry-go-round. I made a little mo-\ndel to prove this. You can get charming\naffects by such means. The scene at the\nback may have remained the same, or may\nlave been changed by simply raising and\ndropping, in the usual way.\n2. No doubt someone can, and will.\n3. There is no limit to Italian invention:\n3r other genius.\n4. Artist s jottings of something very good\nwhich he could do better, or thought he could.\n1 B. Tiring chambers, which looked like\nbuildings, and were used as such when the\nplay demanded.\n2 B. The spectators \" go to the theatre \",\nthe actors to the stage.\n3 B. All magnificence should be ample,\nThis was the setting for the plays of the con-\ntemporaries of Michael Angelo, who were\nmuch concerned with the right use of space,\nor as they called it, \" with the art of de-\n»#\nsign.\n4 B.... ?\nFRANCOIS M. FLORIAN. (Lucerne).\nMy dear Mr John Semar,—you ask too\nmuch. You would like me to make a fool\nof myself or a historian, or a pedant. Do\nhonour to the imagination of man or at least\nto his fancy, and do not ask us to be lear~\nned about what no one can know. Our fancy\nis so nimble you know.\n1 have no doubt that this good Antonio\nSan Gallo scribbled down hundreds of such\nlittle notions as the one in your design. Raf-\nfaello did the same. Aristotle San Gallo,\nAntonio s father or uncle or nephew (what\nmatter which) did the same. Peruzzi, Sab-\nbattini, Chiaramonte, Bramante, Genga- (see\nwhat a lot of names I know), Pericolo (molto!)\nLa Cecca (ah), Lancia, Buontalenti, Baldi\nProfondavalle ....how many thousands of such\nlittle sketches aod scribblings must they have\nlet fly from their wrists into the air. Where\nare they all now ? Still flying in the air ? I\nsuspect! How catch them all, get them all\ninto their right order again? ...!and once in\norder how then fill in those gaps which\nthe men when living talked, filling in with a\nword or two here, a word or two there.\nTo rebuild an old wall exactly as it was\nyou have to collect all the old stones. Col-\nlect them then if you can ....but don't forget\nthe mortar or whatever else served to join\nthem. And when putting them together try\nto get them each in his old place, so as to\nget the wall to look as it really looked. Then\ngive 150 years of time and may be you'll\nrecover the old beauty.\nBut have you ever yet seen this done, or\nhave you perhaps seen a picture of it ? I fear\nthat's all you can ever see or hope to see,\nI fear you can never reconstruct an old wall\nprecisely as it was and as for an old idea,"}, {"page_pdf": 62, "page_imprimee": "154", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.62", "texte": "you need a lot of humbug to join its dis-\njointed notions, as the bricks need a lot of\nold mortar.\nAh what folly your pretty plan exposes.\nYou solemnly set out to ask twenty or thirty\nwise men to explain what is beyond explana-\ntion, to reconstruct, plus common sense, this\nfunny notion by the good Antonio. And the\nten or twelve will respond—solemnly: and\nyou will as solemnly print their \" conclu-\nsions \".\nBut you have done a good thing through\nyour folly. You have once again proved how\nimportant it is that artists of 1925 shall create\nafresh, shall go ahead, do any wild thing,\nmad thing, rather than that maddest of things,\nreconstruct.\nYou have made it clear for the hundredth\ntime, that to waste time wondering what it\nwas they did in 1525 or 1825 may be a\ngood waste of second rate time, but is an\nabominable waste of first rate time. First\nrate time is the day, the hour, the moment\nof the artist. Waste him and his hours and\nmoments, and you and your nation are playing\nthe fool. He is nimble and he is gifted by\nthe Gods, and you run a grave risk in not\nasking him to be himself, to invent ever new-\ner things for everyone. Let him remain\nyoung since he has a young mind and spirit *,\nlet him go ahead; let him sow seed; let\nhim amuse himself that way since he enjoys it.\nEncourage that in him—and reap the harvest.\nAnd now as I shall be in Koln next week\nI shall go and study for a few days at the Thea-\ntrewissenschaft Institute at their University—\nfor 1 very much doubt the entire truth of\nwhat I have written here.— Perhaps a little\nsuffering in the Institute will make it clearer.\n° W. R. LETHABY. (London). O\nForo I suppose was the Roman Forum,\nAula Regia was rather the Basilica or Pu-\nblic Hall in the Forum than a Royal Palace.\n1 suppose spectators looked through the Ba-\nsilica into the Forum beyond. It would seem\nto have been a classical Roman play in which\n\" the Gods \" appear.\nMay not the hospitalia be Inns ? A Ro-\nman theatre was a semicircle with a scene,\nin adopting the word in the middle ages\nthe curved part may have been the theatre\nproper. The opitio (?) on left seems to have\nan open room ( camera) on upper floor and\ntwo windows on exterior below; also door\nbelow on left of centre. The right hand one\nhas two external windows in each floor. The\nbig flag-like thing 1 suppose is one side of\ntriangular revolving scenes: similar one shown\nsmaller on right in position ? That is raised\nhigh ? Three scenes on revolving triangular\nframes are well known. They allowed three\neasy changes and possibly more if loose pain-\ntings were hung up over the first lot.\n0 GORDON CRAIG. (Genova)~o\n1. I haven't the faintest idea—and I shall\nbe very surprised if anyone else is able to\nspeak with authority. It is the only drawing\n1 know of where triangles are used\nanother scene.... for obviously they revolved\ninside those side ospitiishowing though the\nupper part of the face of the side scenes.\nBut everyone can see this : — I can suggest\nnothing new. A god or a saint appears sur-\nrounded by clouds and seraphs as in the„old\nbox of tricks revealed by Furtenbach, Padre\nBrueil and others.\n3. If a thing can go round like this trian-\ngular affair it certainly would tempt many a\nscenic man to make use of the fact and put\nnew scenes on it on each revolution. — but\nItalians of that day wouldn't.\n4. I think it is a record of something seen\non a stage,—the sketchy drawing suggests\nthis and the artist's notes make it more\nevident\n1 B. What are \" Ospitii \" ? I have no\nnotion ....places for the actors to wait and\nrecover in ?\n2B. Teatro was a place to see a show\nin and a semicircle seems to have been pro-\nved best for seeing from—whereas a full cir-\ncle or an oval was best for hearing in and\nan Odeo was made so.\n3 B. This Foro has always puzzled me, and\nI have come across no explanation which is at\nall illuminating. Was it a place built out in\nfalse perspectives—built of thin wood and\nplaster and not to be approached by the per-\nformers, ....not a \" practicabile \" ? I imagine so.\nThe spectators in those days, were but only\nprinces and men of taste, but were by no means\nprejudiced against a bit vof unnecessary sce-\nnery. The acting and singing were perfect,\n— had to be — so if Raffaello, Peruzzi or"}, {"page_pdf": 63, "page_imprimee": "155", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.63", "texte": "San Galio wished to build up some imitation\nForums or Palaces, why not ? No one would\nnote them beyond their worth. No one would\nfail to note them and their worth. A per-\nformance was then looked on as a delight, to\nsee and to hear.\nNot display, either in voice or trappings,\nbut style was the thing. The critics praised\nthe first rate in terms of the first rate,—and\nDemocracy had not at that time made itself\nunsafe for the whole world.\nHORACE WYNDHAM. (\n1. Possibly as a \" strong post \", behind\nwhich an inferior company of players might\ntake shelter from angry critics and disappoin-\nted members of the audience.\n2. This looks to me like an ambitious ef-\nfort to dramatise one of the earlier books of\nEuclid, as a \" Great Triangular Drama \" or\n\" Problem Play\n3. This depends. Really economical ma-\nnagers would probably have only one scene\nthroughout, labelling each act \" the same\n4. Probably a sketch for work which the\nartist hoped he would persuade an adventu-\nrous manager to produce.\nALFRED MORTIER. (Paris).\nThe drawing or sketch which you attri-\nbute to Antonio di San Gallo has very much\ninterested me. Here are the thoughts that it\nhas suggested to me.\nLet us first examine the manuscript text,\nwhich accompanies the sketch. On certain\npoints my interpretation differs from yours.\nInstead of facivevano I read facieoano. But\nthat is unimportant, the sense remaining the\nsame. Instead .of \" come dicie di tre\nsorte \" which you translate exactly by \" as I\nsaid of three kinds \", I propose to read: si\nfacieva varii adornamenti comedici e di tre\nsorte.\nComedici is an ancient word, which has\ndisappeared from the Italian language, but\nwhich is derived in direct line from the La-\ntin comoedicus and signifies \" relative to the\ncomedy \".\nThe sense which I propose seems to me\nclearer, more accurate and more plausible.\nWill you note, in fact, that the version \" come\ndicie\" (as I said) relates to nothing, since\nSan Gallo has not spoken at all before of\nthree sorts of ornaments (1).\n\" Secondo la materia \" signifies quite\nobviously \" according to the material of the\ncomedy \"; that is to say, according to the\ndecorative requirements necessitated by the\nsubject of the piece, according to the scene,\nthe place, where the action passes ; and can\nsignify, in addition, according to the nature\nof the subject-matter, for you are not una-\nware that there were already, at the time of\nBaldassare Peruzzi, three types of decors, di-\nstinguished, one from another, as the comic,\nthe tragic, and the satiric or pastoral.\nFinally, you translate \" aula regia \" by\n\" Royal palace which seems to me not\nvery exact, and which could lead the stu-\ndent into error. The aula is, originally, an\ninterior court yard usually surrounded by co-\nlumned porticoes. If you look attentively, on\nSan Gallo's sketch, at the part which I have\ndesignated on my plan by the letters M and\nN, (2) you will see that, in M especially,\nSan Gallo has slighty indicated some co-\nlumns standing out from the facade of the\nbuilding and consequently forming a portico.\nAnd, at the foot of these columns, he has\nwritten in \" aula regia \", thus clearly in-\ndicating that this part of the scene, bordered\nby colonnades on the two sides of the stage,\nconstituted the aula, or royal court flanked\nby palaces.\nFurther on, beyond the aula, is seen the\nperspective of the scene which San Gallo calls\nthe Foro. Here an alternative presents itself:\nmust we understand by Foro any public place\nwhatsoever, or more especially the Roman\nForum ?\nThe question is of importance. Were it\na matter of the Roman Forum, that would\nlocalize the researches and permit us to de-\nduce that this scene was destined for a play\nthe action of which was laid at Rome. From\n1510 to 1530 these pieces are not numerous;\nI for my part know only the \" Amicizia \"\nof Jacopo Nardi, and the \" Tullia \", a tra-\ngedy by Lodovico Martelli, whose action\ntakes place at Rome. Later, in 1546, there\nis the Orazia by the Aretine and, before that,\n\n(!) An Italian scholar tells us that the leaflet we re-\nproduced evidently followed on from something else, as it\nbegan in the middle of a sentence; so there is no know-\ning what may have preceded. (Editor).\n(2) As in our \" key \" plan. See Plate 12. (Editor)."}, {"page_pdf": 64, "page_imprimee": "156", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.64", "texte": "in 1542, the Talanta by the same author;\nbut the scene of the Talanta was constructed\nand painted by Vasari, who speaks of it in\none of his Letters.\nFor these reasons I hold that, by Foro,\nSan Gallo meant to signify some place (pub-\nlic square) whatsoever of a city, showing\nthe vista of its streets and houses, as usually\ndone in his times.\nIn conclusion, it would be also well to\ndefine with exactitude the expression \"ed\nera cosa (or perhaps casa, which would be\nmore precise) posticcia \", which you have\ntranslated by the somewhat vague term of\n\" constructed thing \", but of which the true\nsense would be \" factitious thing that is\nto say a \" chose factice \", which signifies\na house actually constructed. We must not\nin fact forget that, in the earliest days of\nstage scenery,... until 1535 at least,... the pa-\nlaces and houses on the stage were solidly\nconstructed in wood ; it is only later that Ser-\nlio advises replacing the solid wood with can-\nvas painted and fixed upon frames as is still\ndone today.\nSan Gallo takes care, then, to specify\nthat the two lateral \" ospitij \" are not to be\nconstructed, but that they are \" cosa postic-\ncia '*; that is to say, capable of being remo-\nved or replaced easily and at will. (2) That\nis why I consider that you have been right\nto add \" moveable\", and 1 reply to your\npoint of interrogation: *' Yes, Sir, certainly\nmoveable \".\nWhy \" moveable \" ? For a very simple\nreason; which is that, after the death of Gi-\nrolamo Genga, his pupil Baldassare Lancia\nor Lanci of Urbino (1510-1571), and also\nAristotile di San Gallo who was — let us note\nthis important detail—the uncle of our An-\ntonio di San Gallo, began to establish gira-\nting scenery decors.\nThe \" Ospitij \" of which San Gallo\nspeaks are thus made of painted canvas fixed\nup on frameworks, and consequently light and\neasily \" moveable \", so as to obtain some\n\" changements a vue \".\nIn his treaty on \" Perspettiva pratica \"\n(Roma, Mascardi 1644) on page 91, Jacopo\nBarozzi da Vignola speaks at length, and\ngives a design, of the system of the -\nments a vue. And, like our San Gallo, he\ndescribes the triangular apparatus used to\nthis end, turning on a central pivot.\nHe recalls (2) his memories: at Castro, at\nthe Duke Pierluigi Farnese's, the scene changed\ntwice, and was constructed by Aristotile di\nSan Gallo. At Florence, likewise, in 1569,\nat the \" Palazzo ducale \" the scene changed\nseveral times, and the decors were made by\nBaldassare Lanci d' Urbino, of whom I have\nspoken above.\nLet us note in regard to this an interesting\ndetail. Towards 1542 Aristotile di San Gallo,\nwithout employment, goes to Roma to his\nnephew Antonio di San Gallo, to seek work;\nfor Antonio held a good position there in\ndecoration and architecture. It is in the fol-\nlowing year (3) that Aristotile repairs to Castro\nto execute the rotating scenery of which I\nhave spoken above. It is possible that the\nnephew may have shown the uncle his draw-\nings and his ideas about the girating scene.\n5|C *\nLet us now examine attentively the sketch\nof Antonio di San Gallo.\nThe drawing A presents no difficulty.\nIt is a prismatic chassis (framework), a prism\nturning on a pivot. According to Barozzi da\nVignola, each face of the prism was painted\nwith a different subject or view. Here it\nseems that each face of the prism may have\nbeen surrounded by a frame, and that it had\nsome slight depth, so as to afford place for\none or more actors ; in short, a veritable little\nscene, and not merely a flat painted surface.\nIn fact, in his commentary, San Gallo says :\n\" Perche in ogni facia a varij li efetti doe in\nuna Vaparitione delli dei etc....\nIf an apparition, god, goddess or phantom,\ncan find place there, that means that the little\nscene has depth; but necessarily a very re-\nstricted depth, on account of the other faces\nof the prism. That matters little however,\n\n(1) Opere di Vasari, Firenze, 1882 pg. 284).\n(2) Serlio expressly says that the ospizia were origi-\nnally of massive wood, and they were such in 1513 at\nUrbino for the Calandria, the decor of which was made\nby Gerolamo Genga. (Editor).\n(1) In our copy only A triangular affair is described*\nNot this one. Another sort altogether. {Editor).\n(2) We are under the impression that it is Dr Ignazio\nDante, the commentator of Vignola, who remembered and\nrecords these two performances. His edition of Vignola\nappeared in Rome for the first time in 1583, followed by\n4 later editions in 1602, 1611, 1683 (Bologna) and 1743.\n(Venezia). See Haym 1773. {Editor).\n(3) Letter of Claudio Tolomei of June 27 1543."}, {"page_pdf": 65, "page_imprimee": "157", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.65", "texte": "for an apparition generally remains motionless\nand does not need much space as do the\nactors who come and go. Thus the prismatic\nscene suffices perfectly for its function.\nWe now come to the enigmatic question\nof the manoeuvring of the apparatus.\nThis is my interpretation, founded not\nupon hypotheses but solely on the most care-\nful examination of the San Gallo design of\nwhich you have failed to perceive an impor-\ntant detail, which to my mind illumines the\nwhole working. (I)\nAt the outset and normally the \" ospitij\nare free, because they serve as coulisses for\nthe actors who come on or go off the stage.\nWe have seen this system practised in our\ndays by Max Reinhardt(2>, who, having sup-\npressed the ancient portants forming a coulisse,\nreplaced them by some constructions, not\nsuspecting, probably, that his intended novelty\nwas some centuries old.\nBut here it is that, owing to the exigencies\nof the drama or action (per ascione), the\nmachinist wishes to utilize the macchina (fi-\ngure H) (3) or prismatic apparatus.\nFor the moment this \" macchina \" is si-\ntuated in what we call the \" cintres \" of the\ntheatre, or, to be clearer, in the upper struc-\nture, that high part invisible to the spectators.\nThis upper part of the theatre was perfectly\nadapted for the preparation up there of all\nthat was required. Barozzi da Vignola(4)\n(op. cit. p. 91) relates that he has seen the\nsky open and that \" there appeared in the\nair a great number of men in the form of\ngods, who sang and played a delicious music,\nand at the same time a cloud descended\nunder their feet, which covered in the whole\nscene \".\nConsequently the \" macchina \" H was, if\nnecessary, equipped with its scenery up there.\nThe <f macchina \" H could rise and des-\ncend at will, supported by its central pivot,\nexactly like one of our modern lifts. When\nit was high up, the actors of the piece had\nthe free use of their \" ospitio which tra-\nversed only the stock of the lift. When H\nhad to descend, the actors withdrew from the\nospitio so as not to be crushed.\nAt the desired moment, and planned\nfor example, for the apparition of the gods, H\ndescended. When once H was at the bottom,\nthe ospitio G mounted to the flies, like the\ncover of a box which one lifts up.\nIn your questions you ask: Was the trian-\ngular scene behind the ospitii or rooms ?\nI reply : no, and I prove it. Will you\nlook on my plan (figure BCDE), at the little\ntriangle E (2). You will there perceive a detail\nwhich has escaped you, and which San Gallo\nhas indicated on his sketch. The triangle is\nset in a square.\nThe square is the \" ospitio \", a structure\nwhich, indeed, possesses its four sides, as\nhere: unless it be that, on the back side, in-\nvisible to the spectator, there is an empty\nspace permitting the angle of the triangular\nprism to exceed the line, as the drawing of\nSan Gallo clearly indicates.\nYou then ask : was there hung a square\nof cloth in front, etc....\nAnd I conclude : no, not a piece of stuff\nbut a veritable cage, which covered and hid\nthe triangle until the moment when the cage\nwas hauled up into the air and allowed the\ntriangle be seen.\nThus the ospitio was not transparent.\n* *\nHere then is my reply to your question\nNo. I.\nTo question No. 2, (\" Can anyone say\nfor what play ?) I am incompetent to reply\nand have not the time to make the necessary\nresearches. All that I can say is that the\npiece is a tragedy since the scene takes place\nin an aula regia.\nNo. 3. Nothing would prevent the adjust-\nment, during the course of the piece, of other\ndecors to the triangle, since two sides of it\nwere always invisible to the spectators.\nNo. 4. San Gallo's drawing seems to me\nto refer to a past work which he has seen,\nfor he says : \" si facievano, fingevasi.... donde\n\n(1) How happy we are to have left so much for our\nguests to tell us at this gathering we need not say. We\nare honoured to see them at our table and to hear them\nexchanging their views—differing or agreeing and in this\nfriendly spirit. {Editor).\n(2) It had been practised in England in 1900 before\nProf. Reinhardt adopted it a few years later (Editor).\n(3) See Plate 12. (Editor).\n(4) We believe it is Dr. Ignatio Dante who relates\nthis, not Vignola (Editor).\n(1) i. e. decorated or stage-set.\n(2) Triangle indicated E on our key plan. (Editor)."}, {"page_pdf": 66, "page_imprimee": "158", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.66", "texte": "uscivano etc.... Had it been a question\nof a present work or one to be prepared, he\nwould have written: \"si fanno, fingonsi.... ;\nor else.... \" si faranno, etc.... \".\n* * ❖\nFurther Remarks.\nI am surprised that San Gallo's design\nis dated from 1515 to 1530. (1) Lacking any\nformal and documentary certitude 1 hold it\nto be later, the date being given us when\nAristotile di San Gallo made use of the trian-\ngular scene and the changement a at\nCastro.\nThe great square opening to which you\ndraw attention in the ospizio F on the left\ndoes not seem to me seriously to weaken my\ntheory. I doubt whether this was an ope-\nning, for such opening would have allowed\nthe ascent and descent of the triangular lift\nto be seen, and would have consequently\nbeen opposed to the purpose of the ospitii,\nwhich were destined, on the contrary, to\nhide the lifts.\nThis square seems to me to be a kind\nof balcony, but closed at the bottom in such\na way as not to let the interior be seen.\nFinally I draw your attention on my dia-\ngram to the lines L and L, which do not\nfigure on your \" Key to the design but\nwhich exist on the original design, and which\nare the lines of perspective of the triangle (2).\n«£• of*\ncr^m\nDear Sir.\n1 add some observations to my letter of\nyesterday.\n1° In observing, on the design by San\nGallo, the prismatic apparatus raised to the up-\nper part of the theatre (figure H in my plan) (3)\none notes that it is furnished with a frame.\nIt is, then, actually a little scene—and thus\nthis apparatus differs from the flat painted\nsurface mentioned by Barozzi da Vignola.\nMoreover one perceives two indications\nwhich represent, according to me, two per-\nsonages. Iis the head and Yis the body.\nY head.\nThis personage, a god or an apparition,\nis indicated in a yet clearer fashion in the\nenlarged apparatus (2) (figures A on my plan),\nshowing the right arm raised, the left arm\nbent. It seems to appear in the middle of a\nlandscape of rocks. (3)\n2° I add likewise that if aula signifies\n\" cour interieure (interior court) or peristyle,\nit may equally mean \" Salle d'un palais \"\n\" Saloon, hall, of a palace\", and in the pre-\nsent case it is this latter sense which ought\nto prevail, for San Gallo expressly states\n\" fingievasi una sala \".\nOne may then ask oneself what the back\nof the decor or Foro represented; for if the\naula regia represents a closed salle, the back\ncan no longer represent the perspective of a\ncity, habitually painted in the XVI century.\nThere is here a little difficulty to resolve.\n3° El parato ? I think that by this word\nmust be understood the decorated part of the\ntheatre (la partie decoree du theatre), the\nconstructed part (partie construite) as opposed\nto the merely painted perspective.\nA. M. NASALLI-ROCCA. (Ptacenz4\nIn any case I can tell you at once that the\nverbs used in the past tense make me think\nthat Sangallo was treating of a representa-\ntion seen by him. It would be well to make\nhistorical researches.\n1. It seems from the design that the la-\nteral triangular scenes were used to change\nthe picture with the greatest celerity at each\nchange of action or ascione, such as the an-\ncient \" pieces \", comprising a succession of\nsomewhat complex events, often called for.\n2. It is not possible to say for what\nplay without making precise and accurate re-\nsearches regarding the activities of Antonio\nSan Gallo.\n3. The interesting machine, which must\nhave worked a perno (pivot-wise) on the\nospitii, was evidently invented for a special\nplay in which there was to be a rapid ap-\n\n(.1) We dated it so, recalling that in 1515 Giorgio\nVasari made machines for the performances at the'Court\nof Tuscany. The triangle was the most obvious of all\nmachines and employed since the time of Augustus.\n(2) We had observed these and took them to be\ncurved lines and too troublesome to put in by type. We\ntook them to represent a dome and a figure on top, or\neven clouds turning the square into an oval. Who knows ?\nDr. Mortier's explanation seems to us better. (Editor).\n(3) See our \" key plan, Plate 12. (Editor).\n(1) See the part indicated by H, Plate 12. (Editor).\n(2) See figure A, in key plan. (Editor):\n(3) Strange, but to us the figure seems to be surroun-\nded not by rocks but by four angels or saints. (Editor)."}, {"page_pdf": 68, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.68", "texte": "A DESIGN BY ANTONIO SAN GALLO IL GIOVANE (1485-1546) SHOWING DEVICE FOR A\nTRIANGULAR SCENE FOR A THEATRE,\nfrom a hitherto unpublished design in the Uffizi Library, Firenze.\nPlate 11.\n\nTHE MASK «\n1925"}, {"page_pdf": 69, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.69", "texte": "A KEY TO THE SAN GALLO DESIGN AND MS.\n\nItalian : Aularezio e li ospi | talia si\nfacivevano | in sul proscienio que j llo che\nnoi diciamo | el parato e fingieva | si una\nsala e da ogni | canto uno ospitio | overo\nCamera don j de uscivano li recitanti j e\ndera cosa postitia perche | secondo la ma-\nteria si facie | va varii adornamenti | come\ndicie di tre sorte. I\nEnglished literally :\nRoyal palace and the hospitalia (or\nroom) made on the stage that we call the\nparato (apparatus f decors f) and represen-\nted a sala and at each angle an ospitio or\nroom whence the actors came forth and it\nwas a constructed thing (moveable f) because\naccording to the effect of the play (*) there\nwere made various adornments as 1 said\nof three kinds.\n(*) doubtful.\nItalian '. Triangulare | machina quale j\nsi gira secondo li | efetti della Comedia |\nperche in ogni facia | a varij li efetti cioe |\nin una laparitione | delli dei | nel atra un\naltro atto | nelaltra uno ato.\nEnglished literally :\nTriangular machine which turns accor-\nding to the effects of the comedy because\non each side it has different effects ; that\nis, in one the apparition of the gods in the\nother another act in the other another act.\n\nTHE MASK\n1925\n\nPlate 12."}, {"page_pdf": 71, "page_imprimee": "159", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.71", "texte": "parition of Olympian Gods. This rendered\nnecessary the rapid transformation of the\nscene. There could be three fixed scenes as,\non the other hand, there could be others set\nor hung over these when the play so required.\n4. It is more probable that the artist may\nhave planned a machine and a scene adapted\nto a particular play rather than have recorded\na work already accomplished, because in this\nlatter case there would perhaps be more am-\nple and definite theatrical details.\n1 B. It is certain that the ospitii were the\nrooms set apart for the actors; and they ap-\npear evidently to be such, both from their\nposition at the sides of the scene, and from\nthe inscription which accompanies the sketch\nattributed to Sangallo il giovane. I believe\nthat the name of ospitii derives from the analo-\ngous denomination in use in the Greco-Roman\ntheatre which, precisely at the sides of the\nstage, had the galleries destined to receive\nand shelter the actors and Theatrical pro-\nperties.\n2B. The Teatro in the past was gene-\nrally the stable part of the building destined\nfor spectacles, and precisely that defined by\nthe place for the spectators and the cavea.\nThus, in the design, the part denominated\nteatro, with the accessory space destined for\nthe orchestra, and the other given over to the\nconstruction of the scena (stage). The scena\nwas in fact an addition ; moveable, and added\nlater; and evidently did not form part of the\nteatro as built, but was only like a joined-on\nstructure.\n3 B. The foro is the usual place destined\nfor public gatherings and does not appear to\nhave any special significance\" in our pre-\nsent case. If it is held, as appears, that the\ndrawing relates to a particular work, it is\nevident that in the representation of the scenic\nsetting there must have been a foro, but whe-\nther Greek, Roman, Fantastic-mythological,\ndoes not matter. In the matter of the di-\nmensions the sketch has no pretensions to\ntechnical exactness ; and, on the other hand,\nit being necessary to give a proportion, the\nforo had to be more ample than the Aula\nRegia.\n4B. Aula Regia is right in so far as it\nshould relate to a definite scene for a parti-\ncular work which required the representation\nof a regal hall with a view through an open\nbackground on to the Foro.\nALLARDYCE NICOLL. (London)-\nIn connection with the exceedingly inte-\nresting early XVI century drawing which has\nbeen kindly sent to me I should like to make\na few remarks both on the MS text and on\nthe plan itself.\n1. Although I am not a palaeographer I\nam inclined to question some of the reading\nof the MS. Lines 5 and 10 of the first pas-\nsage are clearly doubtful; I should suggest\nthat the word 44 parato \" in the former should\nbe read 44 parete \" and that 44 e dera cosa\npostitia\" should be read 44 aveva cosa (or\n' cosi ') posti tre \". The \"u\" of the word\nI take to be \" aveva \"is not unlike the 44 u \"\nin the first word of the passage, while the\n\"tre\" is very similar to the \"tre\" in the\nlast line of all. The translation would then\nbe as follows :\n\" Aula regia and the hospitalia were\n\" made on the proscenium which we call the\n4 wall * and a sala was simulated and at\n\" each side an ospitio or room whence the\n\" actors came forth. This had 3 stations so\n\" that according to the subject matter various\ndecorations were given, as I said, of three\n<< 1 •J »»\nkinds .\nIt seems to me that this gives a better\nsense to the whole passage.\n2. While the drawing, judging from the\npast tense of the verbs, is not a design for a\nperformance not given, 1 question whether it\nreally represents an Italian theatre. If this\ndrawing be compared with the fanciful Ro-\nman theatre given in the Jocundus edition of\nVitruvius (1513) a startling similarity will be\napparent. The \" teatro \" is simply a trans-\nlation of the Greek @£axpov (from ©saa&at\n4 to see ') in its original sense of 4 the audi-\ntorium '. In Vitruvius we get the hospitalia\nat each side and in the middle the valvae\nregiae, corresponding to the aula regia here.\nFinally, at the rear of the stage is a square\nodeum which would be the equivalent of the\nforo in the drawing. As regards the triangulate\nmachina, Daniello Barbaro has a note in his\nedition of Vitruvius which may serve as a\ncommentary :\n44 Vtrunque aliae portae erant concharum\n\" modo, quas Nichios dicimus, ita pro fronte\n44 scenae tres erant apertiones, ante quas in\n44 singulis machinae erant collocatae triangu-\n44 lares axibus versatiles, in singulis earum"}, {"page_pdf": 72, "page_imprimee": "160", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.72", "texte": "\" frontibus picturae erant secundum fabularum,\n\" quas agebant, opportunitatem. Nam in una\n\"comica scena, pro Comoediis, in altera tra-\n\"gica pro tragoediis, in tertia satyris designa-\n\" batur. Vertebantur illae facies, & ab illis ma-\n\" chinis Dii loquebantur\nMay this drawing not be an attempt to\nsketch out a reconstruction of the early stage\nas that stage was known to the groping Re-\nnascence theorists ?\nSEN. CORRADQ RICCI. (Roma).\nI could tell you various things which I\nthink respecting the drawing by Sangallo, but\ndo not find that I can write them, as drawings\nwould have to be made and perhaps a little\nmodel would also be necessary. If you have\noccasion to come to Roma, or I to Firenze, it\nwill be well to meet and discuss it. It seems\nto me an interesting thing.\no JACK B. YE AT S. {Ireland), o\nI have no knowledge of these things but\nwould suggest a Chinese origin.\nFERDINANDO MASSAI. {Firenze).\n1B. Ospitii, (see to , that is to\nlodge, receive, take into one's house, refer-\nring to persons from without; Vocabulary of\nthe Crusca :) were the rooms which received\nthe actors before and after they had performed\ntheir part. Today they are called \" camerini\".\n2B. A rhetorical figure: naming the part\nfor the whole.\n3B. \" Forum is the name given to the\npart at the back of the stage\": the word\nis taken from Vitruvius, etc. \" thus wrote\nA. M. Salvini in his Annotations upon the\n\" Fiera \" of Michael Angelo Buonarroti.\n4B. Aularegia, in the theatre, is the most\nconspicuous place which represented in the\ndramas the royal scenes. Tommaseo Bellini.\n(Dizionario della lingua italiana).\nI do not believe that one can translate it\nin English as \" Royal Palace \".\nAMONG others invited to take part in this\nsymposium, but who have written to say\nthey felt incompetent to help us to a solu-\ntion, were Dr Cesare Levi, Mr Lennox\nRobinson and Mr George Jean Nathan. Ed.\n\nSPONTANEOUS VULGARITY\nOR\nEVERYONE HIS OWN KING.\nJ. S.\n-mi—nmiiwiii II in I Mil iiinwium HI 11111111 mn—TBHIBI ■ IIMJULUJILJ\nWE have often said that the two most\nbackward Theatres of Europe are the\nParisian and the London stages.\nTheatres like dogs grow to be like their\nmasters, and the London and Paris theatres\nhave preferred to have as masters their public\nrather than their best artists.\nFor years they have made themselves ri-\ndiculous grovelling before these masters instead\nof ridding themselves once and for all of such\nstupid tyrants. \" What the Public wants we\nwill give that is the heroic phrase of these two\ntoadies.\nAnd whenever we have derided this\npair of Europeans Pantaloons their paid watch-\ndogs have given out a howl of righteous\nindignation.\nRead this extract from one of the biggest\nof English dailies, recording better than we\ncould ever do the precise level to which the\nFrench and English Theatre world has gone\ndown.\nHere is the immortal passage : —\n\" At the Theatre Frangais the other eve-\nning, Alfred de Musset's \" Fantasio \" was\ngiven before an audience comprising, as usual\nat this time of the year, a considerable pro-\nportion of English-speaking visitors.\n\" In the second act, one of the characters\ndiscusses travel and observes that he might\nhave gone to London to see what the English\nwere like, but he preferred to save himself\nthe trouble, as they all came to Paris.\n\" These sentiments were highly appre-\nciated by the English spectators, and they\nimmediately broke into a round of ap-\nplause \".\nWhen in past ages a King or an Em-\nperor visited the Theatre and some line in\nthe play could be taken as an allusion to the\nadmired monarch, an audience would some-\ntimes rise up and applaud; —it is never on\nrecord that the King rose up and applauded\nhimself.\nBut what would you have? — To-day\nevery true democrat is his own King; — how\ncharming then, since there is no one to ap-\nplaud him, that he should applaud himself."}, {"page_pdf": 73, "page_imprimee": "161", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.73", "texte": "ENGLISH ACTORS\nAND ITALIAN\nACTORS.\nA COMPARISON\nBY UMBERTO FRACCHIA.\nUMBERTO FRACCHIA writer, is drama-\ntic critic of the journal \" II Secolo\nis editor of the magazine and\nis courageously spreading the reforms which\nshould reconduct the Italian theatre to the\nperfection of its origins and its traditions.\nAs a Writer of a delicate and exquisite\nimpressionism, his two novels, II Perduto\nAmore \" (the Lost Love), and \"Angela and\nthe recent volume of tales, \" Piccola genie di\ncitta \" (Little people of the city) set him\namong the most prominent of the younger li-\nterary men, and in direct reaction from the\nnarrative literature of the period which we\nmight call d'Annunzian.\nTo his daily work as critic he brings the\ndefinite characteristics of a personality which\ndoes not simulate, which knows how clearly\nto distinguish and separate art from what is\nnot art. The pretentious and tenacious obsti-\nnacies of the old dramaturgs, the like igno-\nrance of the scenographers, the base specula-\ntions of the capocomici, ...the actor-managers,\nand of the trade-like actors, find in him an\nenemy; while every intelligent young worker,\nand all the courageous and go-ahead innova-\ntors have in him the most faithful of allies.\nHis very face, the face of an adolescent sur-\nmounted by a precocious > inspires\ntrust and diffuses an encouraging serenity which\nsays very little and does very much.\nRaffaello Calzini.\nENGLISH ACTORS AND ITALIAN.\nSOME time back, while carrying out for my\npaper (I) an enquiry into the conditions\nof the dramatic theatre in the principal nations\nof Europe, I had the opportunity, during a\nbrief stay which I made in London, to com-\npare the English actor, with whom I was\nwholly unacquainted, with the Italian actor,\nall of whose good qualities and all of whose\ndefects I know thoroughly well. I have not\nbeen able to pursue my studies in this matter\nvery deeply. Hence I am the first to recog-\nnize that, in speaking of the English actor,\nI shall not be able to pass any judgments,\nbut merely to give my \" impressions \", leaving\nto the reader, more expert than I, the task\nof correcting my probable errors.\nThe English actor has above all a \" style\nwhich the Italian actor lacks. He seems to\nignore the genial improvisations which are the\nnatural product of a nature extraordinarily\nsubject to the gusts alike of the true and of\nthe false passions. The lack of \" dramatic\ntemperament \" which, according to us people\nof the south, is inherent in the English race,\nmakes itself felt also in the theatre. It is thus I\nexplain how it is that the English actor, who\nseemed to me excellent in acting comedy,\nfarce, pantomime and classic tragedy, appeared\nto me somewhat cold, colourless, and meagre\nin expression in the interpretation of the\nmodern drama. But this defect is also con-\ntributed to by the \" School \", which I believe\nis a \" high school \" for all, and which perhaps\nderives from the special social education\n.pertaining to certain classes of the English\nnation. The dress, the bearing, the gesture,\nthe tone of voice, of the leading actor and\nof the leading actress are not noticeably\ndistinguishable from those of the lowest super\nwho comes to the front of the stage to speak\nthe single line of ten words which constitutes\nhis whole part.\nA correct, measured, easy naturalness, the\nmechanical foundation of which only the\nmediocre actors disclose, while the better\nones know how marvellously to conceal every\ntrace of study and of effort, constitutes exactly,\nin my opinion, the \" style \"of the English\nactor. It is not the disordered, unequal and\nfrequently even discordant spontaneity of the\nItalian actor, and it is not the elegant but man-\nnered stylization of the French actor. It is a\nquid medium between these two extremes.\nCertainly, on the English stages, bad actors\nare also to be met with; but some small degree\nof style exists equally in all, be they good or\nbad :—a sign that all obey one and the same\nrule.\nI have also noted, (and whoever knows\nthe habits of the Italian actor will not be\nsurprised by this observation of mine) that all\n\n(1) 14 Comoedia *\\ a fortnightly illustrated Journal of\nthe Theatre, Milano."}, {"page_pdf": 74, "page_imprimee": "162", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.74", "texte": "keep themselves strictly within the limits of\nthe part assigned to them. The perfect sub-\ndivision of work, which characterizes the\nEnglish people in other fields and which\nconstitutes its great strength, is evidently\nobserved also upon the stage.\nGive an Italian actor of some merit a part,\nbe it but of modest dimensions, in which he\nhas the opportunity of displaying his own\npowers, and, at the opportune moment, (which\nis almost always inopportune) you will see\nhim seek by every means to attract to\nhimself the attention of the public, usurping,\nfor a moment or so, the place of the leading\nactor and creating for his own personage,\nhowever insignificant it be, the illusion of\nbeing for that moment the protagonist of the\ndrama.\nIt does not, on the contrary, seem to me\nto be one of the habits of the English actor\nto overcharge or distort his part for love of\ntheatrical effect. I did not chance, for example,\nat the entrance alone upon the stage of a\nleading actress, to see that which is normal\nin Italy,—an emptiness, a truly \" splendid iso-\nlation left around her instantly as though\nshe were suddenly mounted upon a pedestal\nand the others were but poor pigmies at her\nfeet.\nIn yet stronger contrast with this correct\ndiscipline, and with the measured naturalness\nto which I have referred already, are the\nexcesses, exorbitant even for us who know\nthe volcanic dramaticity of Grasso and the\nclamorous comicality of Musco and of Petro-\nlini, to which the English actors attain in the\ndrama of adventure of the type of that \" Good\nLuck \" which was represented during the past\nyear at Drury Lane, and in classic farce, as\nin \" The Merry Wives of Windsor \" which\nat that time was being performed by a Shake-\nspearean company at the Golders Green\nHyppodrome. It was in fact a revelation to\nme to see with how much unrestrained brio\nthere unfolded before my eyes, accustomed to\nthe timid—(timid through a too great respect) —\nItalian interpretations of the same comedy, the\ngay adventures which set forth the Garter Inn,\nthe streets, and Windsor Park (l). A work\nwhich I had until the previous day considered\narchaic appeared to me all at once as extraor-\ndinarily alive, thanks to the overpowering and\nbroad comicality of its interpreters. In like\nmanner as the English actors adopt this spe-\ncial method in the classic farce of Shake-\nspeare does the Italian actor change in style,\nin manners, in customs, when he acts Goldoni.\nIn conclusion, I consider that our Italian\ntheatre lacks a good scuola di plotone, while\nthe English theatre would perhaps be benefitted\nby a course of individual exercises.\nThe Italian actor can boast a greater\nwealth of natural gifts, a greater ductility and\nelasticity of talent, a more sensitive and im-\npassioned nature. The English actor can\nboast in his turn the superiority which derives\nfrom a disciplined study, from a more cons-\ncientious respect for his art; and, above all,\nfrom the habit of reciting without a prompter\nwhich gives him an extraordinary mastery of\nhimself and of his own resources.\n\n(1) Until Miss Ellen Terry came to show English\nactors how to unloose the comedy and make it alive it\nhad been just as timid in our land. (Editor).\n\nTHE PROMPTER\nE. G. C.\nIT may slrike Italian students of the Theatre as strange\nthat my appreciation of the work done by the Italian\nPrompter has increased not lessened.\nI remember once listening to an early rehearsal of an\nItalian Company. I heard the Prompter giving each word.\n\" Then it comes automatically and easily into the ear of\nthe actor \" I thought; \" what a blessing! He has not\nto think ; — all he needs to do is to feel. What a release\nfrom an incubus I thought. Hamlet is there on the\nstage. The ghost appears. He does not know what he\nwill say — and slowly his ear hears the words afar off\nand yet tiny and close in his ear. Angels and ministers\nof grace.... defend us.... why, it is one of the great\nblessings of the Italian stage; it was an inspiration on the\npart of who ever first thought to invent this Prompter.\nDoubtless it was the Dramatic Poet who was the first\nPrompter — and I see no reason why he should not\ncontinue to perform this part of his task.\nAnd this — this wonderful aid to spontaneity — is the\nfigure il Gran Signor Pirandello and others will have\nremoved, so as to save the stage !\n\" Angels and ministers of grace defend us"}, {"page_pdf": 75, "page_imprimee": "163", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.75", "texte": "UNIVERSITIES AND THE DRAMA\nA REPLY BY PROFESSOR ALLARDYCE NICOLL.\nIT is far from my wish to quarrel with the\naims and intentions of The Mask, a pe-\nriodical which I, as everyone who is truly\ninterested in the drama, most heartily admire\nand honour.\nAt the same time, there are three paragraphs\nin the recent (July) number which seem to\nme to demand some comment, the more espe-\ncially as two of them are directly inspired\nby my own article in the last issue.\nI refer to Mr. C. G. Smith's letter on\np. 143, to the Editorial Note,— Drama not\nTheatre—on p. 144, and the other note—\nBritish Opera—on p. 150.\nIn many ways, everyone will agree with\ncertain points raised by Mr. Smith. Undoubt-\nedly \" theatricals \" can be carried too far in\na university, and, moreover, \" theatricals\"\nare not fundamentally theatrical at all. It is\nunquestionably bad for students who have a\nliving to make to be led to imagine that they\nare budding Hamlets, and the inglorious (and,\nbe it whispered, on occasions mute) Hamlets\nof College productions can hardly be said to\nhelp on the work of the drama. So far\nMr. Smith, the writer of the Editorial Note\nand I agree. There come now the further\nassumptions that only \"young gentlemen\" go\nto the University and that there is no use in\nstudying the \" laws \" of drama. In the first\nplace, conditions have vastly changed from the\ntime when Collegio this or Collegio that built\ntheatres for its students in XVIII century\nItaly. I can say from experience that the\nmajority of my students have had to deprive\nthemselves of many things before they could\nattend the College classes and all of them\nhave had to think with due seriousness of\nbread and butter questions when they took\ntheir degrees. Secondly, there seems to be\nsome sort of confusion concerning the vital\nquestion of study of the drama and of the\ntheatre. Why does The Mask print va-\nluable plans of Rome and of Paris? Why\ndoes it present to its readers engravings and\ndrawings of by gone theatres? Why does\nit delve into the musty records of the past?\nBecause Mr. Gordon Craig, one of our most\ndistinguished creative artists, knows that inspi-\nration for future endeavour may come from these\nrecords. Surely this is a task which a University\nmay well perform? By studying intensively the\ndocuments of departed centuries, by collecting\ntogether all available materials, by providing\na centre of information on these subjects a\nUniversity may well make itself an integral\npart of the great body theatric.\nPerhaps my views may be clearer if I set\ndown a concrete instance. At East London\nCollege in the University of London I am\nstarting in October (and I trust Mr. Smith\nwill aid me) a School of Dramatic Study\nand Research. This School will not appeal\nprimarily to ordinary undergraduate students;\nit will not exist for the purpose of '' training\nyoung gentlemen in the crafts of the stage \";\nit will not indulge in amateur theatricals.\nOur appeal will be to the acting pro-\nfession and to the student of the theatre.\nWe shall engage in research work such as is\nso ably presented in the pages of \" The\nMask \".\nWe shall endeavour to make the results of\nthat research available by talking of the va-\nrious periods of dramatic literature (treating\nthe drama as drama and not as poetry), of\nthe theatrical art of past times, of the con-\nceptions of drama in past ages, of the latest\nmovements in the international world of the\nTheatre.\nThe Theatre cannot \"be a little world\nby itself for the Theatre belongs to huma-\nnity, and perhaps the Universities may have\nsomething to give to it which the artistry of\nthe theatre will transmute into gold.\nIn announcing this new School of Drama\nin The Mask, I wish therefore to note that I\ndo not wish to train the \" young gentlemen \"\nstudents to be actors, or scene-painters, or\ncostume-designers, or producers. My aim —\nand this I think should be the aim of all\nUniversity departments of this kind — is to\nprovide a cultural centre which may in its\nown way (however slightly) improve the con-\nditions of the theatrical world. It is only the\nlesser and the unsuccessful artists who cry out\nabout the sanctity of art and the contamina-\ntion of scholarship. Your Leonardo da Vinci"}, {"page_pdf": 76, "page_imprimee": "164", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.76", "texte": "and your Dante and your Milton never made\nthat mistake.\nWhile amateur theatricals will not be in-\ndulged in at this new centre, revival of un-\nknown works of the past and performance of\nnew works will form part of the activities of\nthe School. If professional actors and actres-\nses, aided by professional artists and produ-\ncers, co-operate, there seems to be no reason\nwhy a University should not provide the\ncentre for an \"experimental\" theatre. The\nordinary theatrical work in London is hope-\nlessly commercialised. Commercialism of a\ngood sort is, of course, not to be despised\nin the stage world; Shakespeare gave us\nHamlet and Moliere gave us Les Femmes\nSaoanles under those conditions. But the\ncommercialism in the theatre of today is not\nof the right sort; it is parasitic and art-quel-\nling.\nSurely then, there is reason to welcome\nany endeavour which strives, not to curb the\nartist, but to give him the opportunity of de-\nveloping and improving his art ?\nWith these general remarks on the Uni-\nversities and the drama, I should like to make\none comment on the British Opera.\nNo one could be more eager to see\nPurcell on the stage than I, yet one must\never remember that art, especially the art of\nthe theatre, is international.\nThe British National Opera Company is\nan endeavour to create for London a centre\nof interpretative artistry such as Berlin and\nVienna and Paris already possess.\nTo limit the B.N.O.C. to the performance\nof all British seems to me unduly\ninsular.\nSurely a National Theatre, if that ever\ncomes into existence, would not refuse to\nplay Ibsen or Moliere or Goldoni any more\nthan a Continental theatre, nationally supported,\nwould refuse to play Shakespeare or Sheridan ?\nI must apologize for occupying so much\nspace in the pages of The Mask. I have\nhad to write at length because I think there\nhave been misconceptions all round, because I\nbelieve that the theatre can thrive only when\nit is regarded by all in an international spirit,\nand because I look confidently to the suppor-\nters of The Mask and to lovers of the theatre\nsuch as Mr. Smith for encouragement and aid\nin my effort to establish a centre for real dra-\nmatic and theatrical study in London.\nMR. C. G. SMITH'S REPLY\nTHE Editor of \" The Mask \", having\ncourteously shown me an advance proof\nof Professor N icoll*s letter relating to my own\nin the last number, enables me to reply with-\nout delay to some of his points and to make,\nif necessary, yet clearer what I then wrote\nregarding \" University and Drama\nProfessor Nicoll announces the imminent\nestablishment of a school for the study of\nthe art of the theatre at the East London\nCollege.\nThis, in some ways, is an excellent plan.\nIt will not, it is true, be able to train actors\nor make artists, but it can ultimately develope\ncriticism and produce critics; and that is\nsomething.\nBut why does Professor Nicoll take ex-\nception to what he calls my \" assumption \"\nthat \" only ' Young gentlemen * go to the Un-\nversity \" ! why does he seem to slight the old\nEnglish notion that young gentlemen have still\nsome sort of claim though gentlemen ? He\nsays that \" conditions have vastly changed \".\nBut surely conditions have never changed,\nnever can change, to such an extent that a\nCollege education will aim, even if at times it\nfail, to make its students anything other or\nless than gentlemen ?\nOur Colleges are, we shall always suppose,\nto lend men, be they by nature boors, ani-\nmals, what you will, a certain manner; nay,\nmore manners.\nThat is what one feels regarding such an\ninstitution as the old Collegio dei Nobili in\nParma: it did lend its students manners, ad-\ndress, a certain polish. And that is definite\ngain. It matters nothing whether the student\nbe poor, of humble parentage, rich or of the\nbluest blood. Every man surely wishes to\nhave fine manners, nor will he object if the\nworld note it. And the old College Theatres\nwere of value in so far as they contributed to-\nwards this end.\nProfessor Nicoll seems to lay great store\nby the fine fact that a student has paid for\nhis own Education; that he has sacrificed\nmany things to do so, and has had to con-\nsider bread and butter questions while doing\nso.\nThat's A1 highly creditable; but itN\ndoesn't in itself constitute any superiority over\nthose less unfortunately equipped. And those"}, {"page_pdf": 77, "page_imprimee": "165", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.77", "texte": "who believe it does, might consider the words\nof that ballad by Gilbert the wise .... a Lon-\ndoner and which begins :\nSpurn not the nobly born\nwith love affected\nNor treat with virtuous scorn\nthe well connected.\nHigh rank involves no shame....\nWe boast an equal claim\nWith him of humble name\nto be respected.\nBlue blood.... blue blood.... etc.\nProfessor Nicoll must not imagine that any\nof us undervalue the born democrat and the\nintellectual Bolschevic, but some of us can\nnever be brought nor bring ourselves to under-\nvalue the born gentleman. That is all.\nThe second point in my letter in which\nProfessor Nicoll finds \"some sort of confusion\"\nis that wherein I maintained that the study of\nthe Theatre and the Drama were not quite\nof an equal value to a University man:\nthat, while a little drama was most valuable,\ntheatricals were not particularly so ; were, in\nfact, something of a waste of time and\nmoney. And I added that it was perhaps\nthe Theatres more than the Colleges which\nneeded the millions to endow them with the\npower to study Theatricals: in fact that if\nthey were financially endowed with such po-\nwer it would be rendered unnecessary for Col-\n1 a »\nleges to step in: .... dare I even say, butt in.\nProfessor Nicoll mentions Mr Gordon\nCraig, and by so doing strengthens my argu-\nment.\nMr Craig, says Professor Nicoll, has per-\nsuaded the Editor of \" The Mask \" to pub-\nblish \" valuable plans of Rome and Paris and\npresent its readers with engravings and draw-\nings of bygone Theatres and he is to be\npraised \".\nBut praise is cheap, and soft words butter\nno parsnips\". Is Mr. Craig merely to be\n4 praised ' for his services,... a little sweet\nwind blown upon him.... while Colleges are\nto receive solid support to play at Theatri-\ncals, usurp a position not their own ? Because\nMr Craig is an artist, not a collegiate body,\n(not even a Professor like Herr Max Rein-\nhardt) is he to step aside — be side-step-\nped — ; passed over and denied support while\nthat support is given to Universities and Col-\nleges for the very work he initiated and was\nborn to do ?\nHe it is who wishes to reestablish his\n\" School for the Art of the Theatre and\nis entitled to do so since the whole idea for\nsuch Schools originated with him. It seems\nhowever that Professor Nicoll would prefer to\ndo it for him and is laying his plans to do so.\nNow Professor Nicoll is a most able Pro-\nfessor, and he cannot be blamed because he\nis not an artist. To blame him would be as\nirrational as to blame a man for being born\nwith a silver spoon in his mouth.\nBut for all this it is, I think, the artist\nand not the professor who can be relied on\nbest, to give to the theatre all it needs. And,\nso long as college professors put themselves\nforward to usurp the offices which ought by\nevery right to be filled by artists and theatre\nmen, they continue to do the theatre, regar-\nding which they profess to be solicitous, se-\nrious harm.\nProfessor Nicoll writes in rather too pa-\nthetic a tone. He says he thinks there is\nsurely room for 44 any endeavour which strives\nto give the artist opportunity of developing\nand improving his art \". Which is a fine-\nsounding phrase, but a hollow one when\nexamined.\nThe best way to 44 give the artist oppor-\ntunity \" is to stand out of his light, to set\nfoot in no position which should be his by\nright of birth, endowment and capacity; to\nbring the powers of a trained academic intel-\nligence to bear so as to induce those in power,\nthose with financial control, to afford artist\nfunds to work with and opportunity to work.\nFirst put bur friend Gordon Craig into a\nposition to develope the art he knows so well,\nso that artists can thrive through him: then\nthere will be plenty of room in the outer\ncircle for a hundred professors and their ac-\ntivities.\nBut for the Professors to push forward\ntoday into the theatre and say 44 we can do\nthis , while there is a man who has been\ndoing it for twenty years yet who is still waiting\nfor the power and means to give to others\nthe result of his efforts, is a little too much.\nI wonder how the readers of 44 The Mask \"\nfeel about it ?\nMr Craig has had countless imitators.\nNow one more has to be added to the list,\nas Professor Nicoll, who long ago had his\nown task assigned him, pushes forward to run\nthe Gordon Craig School for the Art of the"}, {"page_pdf": 78, "page_imprimee": "166", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.78", "texte": "Theatre, calling it \" The London University\nSchool of Dramatic Study and Research \".\nIt is just what Professor Baker did at\nHarvard.\nFor years Craig had projected and called\nfor such a School. Baker, across the Atlantic,\nlooking up from correcting the theses of the\nyoung gentlemen of Harvard, heard and echoed\nhim, and, being quite smart, got it.\nBut Baker's School was what Nicoll's\nSchool will be, .... a Professor's School.\nCraig called for a school for serious crafts-\nmen who should then be drafted into a spe-\ncial, an experimental, Theatre; who should\nstudy practically under artists, not under pro-\nfessors. And, while he still awaits his op-\nportunity, professors parody the whole scheme,\nsquandering endowment money and their own,\nand, I fear, their students', time\nIf I am a little warm in my expressions\nin this note it is that I for one dislike to see\na valuable artist like Craig wasted, while\nevery amateur seems able to push forward,\nelbowing his way into a position which Craig\nrefuses to use elbows to gain.\n\nMEASURED\nRECITATION\nA STUDY ON THE\nPOETICAL RHYTHMS OF SPEECH\nBY LORENZO GUIDO BREZZO\n11 'tis we musicians know n\n(R. Browning: Abt Vogltr),\nPURE RHYTHM\n1. - Rhythm is the order of elements in\nsuccession.\n2. - A rhythm measure (shortly a )\nis a duration unity that can be repeated inde-\nfinitely in succession.\n3. - Measured isochronism finds its origin\nin the tendency of the mind to perceive phe-\nnomena under the aspect of unity. That per-\nception is easy in proportion to the degree of\nlikeness possessed by the component elements;\nfor, the greater the likeness, the weaker will\nbe the power of attracting attention, exercised\nby each.\n4. - In order to become perceptible to the\near, a measure must be filled with sound. As\nregards speech, the sound is the spoken language.\n5. - In order to make each measure per-\nceived separately, the sound must undergo a\nmodification at the beginning of every measure.\nThe modification, in the present case, is one\nof intensity.\n6. - If we consider the spoken language as\na prolonged sound, every fraction of that sound\nbetween two successive moments of diminished\nintensity constitutes a syllable (1\\\n7. - \" The strength of each separate force-\nimpulse, such as we give to the separate syl-\nlables, tends to diminish progressively. The\nbeginning of each of these force-impulses marks\nthe beginning of the syllable \" We shall\ncall this beginning \" accent \", and use it to\nmark the beginning of the measure.\n8. - When every measure is marked by\nan accent, we have the measured diction,\nwhich gives rise to poetical rhythm. Ordinary (i.\ne. unmeasured) diction produces prose rhythm.\n\n(1) SWEET. A handbook of phonetics, p. 87. —\nJONES. The pronunciation of English, p. 55.\n(2) SWEET. Ibid.p. 89."}, {"page_pdf": 79, "page_imprimee": "167", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.79", "texte": "9. Accent isochronism is therefore the first\nfundamental law of poetical rhythm (1).\n10. - The syllables of any indefinite set\nnever possess accents of equal intensity. If\nwe call the weakest accents 1, accents 2 will\ndivide the set into groups of several measures.\nEach group constitutes a foot. The foot-accent\ntends towards isochronism (9), that is, the set\nis apt to fall into equal feet.\n11. - We shall indicate the measure and\nthe foot by means of the symbols — , VJ . It\nmust be remembered that either of them stands\nfor a measure, not for a syllable. The former\nstands for a measure marked by accent 2,. the\nlatter for a measure marked by accent 1. To\navoid confusion, they shall be called strong and\nWeak, not longa and brevis.\n12. - In any definite set of syllables, some foot-\naccents are stronger. We shall call them 3\nThey will divide the sets into groups, and each\ngroup constitutes a metre. The metre-accent\ntends toward isochronism (9).\n13. - The secondfundamental law o\nrhythm is seen at work constantly for the first\ntime, in connection with the metre. The ac-\ncent proper to a rhythm-member finds its place\nat the end of the member. The reason is\nthis. An accent is a point on which attention\nis focused : what enables a stronger accent to\nattract attention is the difference between its\nown intensity, and that of the weaker accents.\nNow, this difference cannot be felt unless the\nweaker accents be heard first.\n14. - As it is easier to imagine few than\nmany objects together, the rhythm-member that\nis apt to prevail is always the simplest pos-\nsible (3). This fact constitutes the third fun-\ndamental law of poetical rhythm.\n15. This is the notation of the metre of\ntwo two-measure feet, which is the simplest\npossible :\n16. - In any indefinite set of metres, some\nmetre-accents are stronger. We shall mark\nthem 4 (,). They will divide the sets into\ngroups : each group constitutes a verse. The\nverse-accent is final (13), and tends to iso-\nchronism (9). This is the notation of the two-\nmetre verse :\n17. - In the same way, groups of verses are\nformed with final isochronous accents which\nwill be marked 5. Each group constitutes a\npolustich :\n18. - Stanzas are formed in the same way,\nwith final isochronous accents to be marked 6.\nHere is the two-polystich stanza :\n19. - Intermediate rhythm members are not\nas a rule found between the stanza and the\npoem. The last accent of the poem is its\naccent proper, which might* be marked 7, if\nnecessary.\n20. - In the typical stanza scheme (18)\nall the rhythm-members of the same order are\nalike, and all the members are binary. Rhythm\nis therefore perceived here under the aspect\nof unity, as perfectly as possible.\n21. \" Besides the tendency to unity (3), the\nmind possesses a tendency to perceive phe-\nnomena under the aspect of multiplicity. So\nthe perception of a phenomenon is not satis-\nfactory, unless it takes place under both\naspects (2). Unconsciously following this second\ntendency, usage has modified the typical stanza\nscheme, imperfect because too unitary, into\nforms much too numerous to be recorded,\nwhich are obtained by combining in every\n\n(1) 44 The fundamental and necessary law of verse-\nrhythm is the equality of time-periods marked by stress ' .\nPublications of the Modern Language Association of Ame-\nrica, vol. XXXIX, no. 4, Dec. 1924: Report of the\nCommittee on Metrical Notation.\n(2) Further on, it will be sufficient to mark metre-\naccents by placing the sign | before the stressed syllable.\n(3) It must be noticed that a quaternary member is sim-\npler than a ternary one, for it can split into two equal\ngroups; a senary member is simpler than a quinary one,\nfor it can be split into two or three equal groups, and\nso on.\n(1) Further on it will be sufficient to mark metre-accents\nby placing the sign |j before the stressed syllable.\n(2) We cannot, in a non-phylosophical study search\nfor reasons for this fact. Those who admit the existence\nof an objective reality, separated from the perceiving sub-\nject, will think the fact to be connected with the nature\nof that reality; that is, the universe to be, in some my-\nsterious and apparently contradictory way, one and, mani-\nfold at the same time."}, {"page_pdf": 80, "page_imprimee": "168", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.80", "texte": "possible way rhythm-members composed of\nany number of members of inferior order. In\nthese derivative schemes, any of the above-\nmentioned accent-isochronisms may be inter-\nrupted, or disappear. Yet, if we consider\nthe schemes that are met with in the literary\npractice, we shall find that, besides the indispen-\nsable measure-isochronism (8), several others are\ngenerally preserved, among which, stanza-iso-\nchronism is hardly ever wanting.\nSPEECH RHYTHM\n22. -Up to now, we have considered\nsyllables as if they were elements not subject,\nin their grouping, to any law but that of\nrhythm, so that we might use them to embody\nany given pure-rhythm scheme, as we might\nwith the sounds of a musical instrument. If\nthe language were an arbitrary construction,\nif it were possible, in order to represent ideas\nto make up words of such shape and size as\nwe please, we might make speech-members\ntally exactly with the members of any pure-\nrhythm scheme. Every simple idea could be\nrepresented by means of a one measure word,\nevery coumpound idea by means of as many\nwords as there are measures in the foot, and\nso on. But language is an autonomous and\nirregular construction, which we can make use\nof only on condition of respecting its laws.\nIn most cases, therefore, the correspondence\nbetween speech-members and pure-rhythm\nscheme members will be unattainable.\n23. - The members of speech are : the\nword, the phrase, the clause, the period.\n24. - Division of speech-members—. This\nis obvious as far as words are concerned. As\nto clauses and periods, the grammar principles\non the analysis of sentences are sufficient\nA phrase is more difficult to define (2),\nand therefore more difficult to divide by rule.\nYet the difficulty disappears in practice, most\nparticular instances being very clear.\n25. - Accent. — Each member of speech\nis endowed with a proper accent, which could\nbe called the centre of gravity of the whole\nmember. That accent must not be confused\nwith emphasis, which is a further stress added\noccasionally to a word accent, in order to\ngive prominence to the idea for which that\nword stands (I). Since the nature of that\naccent is rhythmical, the accent itself shall\nobey the rules of pure rhythm, as far as lan-\nguage structure and the meaning of speech\nwill permit.\nNamely : Word-accents have a fixed seat\nof linguistic origin, which cannot, as a rule,\nbe influenced by rhythm-law.\nPhrase-, clause-, and period-accents fol-\nlow the second fundamental law of poetical-\nrhythm (13), and place themselves at the end\nof the member.\nNot all accents marked with the same\nnumber have exactly the same degree of in-\ntensity. Yet, to take into account all possible\ndegrees is unnecessary and would lead to\nconfusion. The meaning of numbers in our\nnotation is that any accent of a given order\n—3, for instance-is always stronger than\nthe strongest accent of the inferior order—2—,\nand weaker than the weakest accent of the\nsuperior order—4—.\nThe word on which the accent falls need\nnot be the most important of the member, as\nhere we have to do with accent, not with\nemphasis (25). As long as the accent does\nnot lend the word a prominence inconsistent\nwith the natural meaning of the member, the\nword itself is immaterial.\nIn the following clause, the last word is\na different one at each inversion. Yet the\naccent always falls on that.\nBut time drives flocks from field to \\\\ fold(2)\nFrom field to fold drives time the jj flocks\nThe flocks from field to fold drives (| time\nFrom field to fold time flocks does || drive\nIt is easy to make up similar examples for\nthe phrase and the period.\n26. - Separation of speech-members. —\nSpeech-members are separated from each\nother by means of caesurae. We have syl-\nlable-, word-, phrase-, clause-, and period-cae-\nsurae. A caesura is a moment of relaxed\n\n(1) NESFIELD. English grammar, past and present,\np. 102.\n(2) Ibid. p. 2. Nesfield's definition of the phrase is\nbut a negative one.\n(1) As the nature of emphasis is not rhythmical but\nlogical, the fact itself is outside the scope of our present\nresearch. Besides, emphasis is, to a great extent, arbitrary\nand variable.\nSee E. A. Poe: The Rationale of verse. Complete\nWorks: Black, London 1901, vol. Ill, p. 242.\n(2) RALEIGH. Answer to Marlow s Passionate Shep-\nherd."}, {"page_pdf": 81, "page_imprimee": "169", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.81", "texte": "attention, caused by a diminution of intensity,\nwhich will soon attain to silence, whenever\nthe caesura is of some importance. Since there\ncannot be degrees of silence as there are\ndegrees of intensity, silence-caesurae are in-\ntensified by being lengthened. As a rule,\nthe stronger the accent, the more important\nwill be the following caesura.\nMEASURED DICTION\n27. - Ordinary speech diction is not mea-\nsured, since neither the syllables nor the cae-\nsurae have an absolutely fixed duration. The\nrelative duration values (quantity) proper to\nspeech-sounds, already variable in themselves\nto a notable extent, are moreover incessantly\nmodified by emphasis Yet this variety\nis restrained by limits which cannot be disre-\ngarded in practice, for it is through keeping\nwithin these limits that each uttered portion\nof speech can retain a quantitative physiognomy\nsufficient for its instant recognition. Clearness\nand power of speech greatly depend upon\nthat.\nSpeech becomes measured in order to\nacquire further unity through rhythm (3). That\nend is desirable only inasmuch as it can be\nattained without loss of clearness or power,\nor, at least, with greater gain than loss. Mea-\nsured diction, therefore, must needs be founded\non ordinary good diction. One of its charac-\nteristic features is, that accent always prevails\nover emphasis (25).\n28. - Measures and syllables. —As the\nsyllable is practically the shortest element of\nthe language, it is apt to coincide with the\nmeasure which is the least member of pure\nrhythm. So a measure will usually be filled\nup with a syllable of average length. The\nresult will be that its relative duration will\nprove sometimes a little longer, sometimes a\nlittle shorter than in ordinary diction. If\nthis difference exceeds a certain limit, the\ndiction becomes too artificial, and clearness\nor power of speech is impaired. In that case,\nthe syllable shall be made to last more than\none measure, or a measure shall be filled up\nwith several syllables. Naturalness of utte-\nrance is further preserved :\na) By beginning a syllable after the be-\nginning of a measure, and filling up the gap\neither with a lengthened preceding syllable,\nor with a caesura, according to sense. This\nis often done with weak syllables and occa-\nsionally with strong syllables in weak feet.\nThe fourth syllable begins towards the\nmiddle of the fourth measure.\nb) By beginning a syllable before the be-\nginning of a measure and shortening the pre-\nceding syllable accordingly.\nThe fourth syllable lasts somewhat less and\nthe fifth somewhat more than a measure.\n29. - Feet and words. — Feet naturally\ntend to be binary (14), if that is compatible\nwith natural diction. If not, they become\nternary, again to revert to binary grouping as\nsoon as possible. Yet, should they be com-\npelled to remain ternary for a considerable\ntime, the tendency to the simplest member (14)\nwould be overcome by the law of isochro-\nnism (9), and ternary grouping would acquire\na certain degree of stability.\nThe tendency to foot-accent isochronism\nwill sometimes induce a lengthening, or, less\nfrequently, a shortening of a syllable, not no-\nticeable in ordinary diction, and which is\nquite permissable, so long as it does not in-\nterfere with clearness or power of speech.\nThe second syllable is lengthened in mea-\nsured diction that foot-accent isochronism may\nbe preserved.\n30. - Metres and phrases. — Everything\nthat has been said about feet and words, ap-\nplies to metres and phrases, with the only dif-\nference that metre-accent isochronism will be\nmore often interrupted. For, if it is easy to\nget rid of a redundant measure by shortening\na syllable, or to obtain an extra measure by\n\n(1) SWEET'S Handbook,p. 97.\n(1) TAGORE. Gilanjali, 2.\n(2) SPENSER. T Bridal Day.\n(3) TAGORE. Gitanjali, 2."}, {"page_pdf": 82, "page_imprimee": "170", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.82", "texte": "lengthening a syllable or inserting a short\ncaesura, it is hardly ever possible to make\naway with the duration of one or several feet, or\nto wedge in a long caesura without marring\nthe sense. Yet, instances of metres, partly\nfilled up with words, and completed by means\nof added silent measures, are very often to be\nmet with (34). Here are examples of how\ndifferent metres get formed under the influ-\nence of speech-rhythm;\nThe binary metre is preserved throughout,\nas the sense allows the syllable \" cap \" to\nhave accent 3 on it.\nAs the sense forbids the first syllable of\n\" little \" having an accent stronger than 2,\nthe metre becomes ternary. On the other\nhand, as \"cap \" cannot have an accent weaker\nthan 3, the following metre consists of a single\nfoot.\nA new foot, with accent 2 (tiny) being\nadded, the metre becomes quaternary.\nOwing to the new foot (pretty), with\naccent 2, the metre becomes quinary. It is\nto be noticed that quinary metres are already\ncomparatively rare, and longer metres are\nbecoming rarer and rarer as ihe number of\ncomponent reet increases.\n31. - Verses and clauses. — The difficulty\nof preserving accent-isochronism is still greater.\n32. - Polystichs and periods. — To pre-\nserve accent-isochronism is all but impossible.\n33. - There are no members of speech\nthat outwardly correspond to stanzas. They\nare made up of several periods linked toge-\nther into a compound one by the sense.\n34. - Duration of caesurae. — When a\nsufficient number of measures marked by syl-\nlable-accents has been heard, the measure is\nkept up, for some time, by habit, in the mind,\nthough the voice be silent. The same thing\nhappens with all rhythm-members. It is clear\nthat the period of a rhythm-member cannot\nchange during silence, for want of accent.\nTherefore a caesura (9) shall normally last\nas many measures as are required, in order\nthat the first subsequent accent may fall in\nwith the accent-period in progress.\n35. - From what has been said, it follows\nthat measured diction does not necessarily\ndepend on any special arrangement of words,\nthough that arrangement may have a great\ninfluence upon the degree of excellence of\nthe poetical rhythm obtainable in each instance.\nTherefore, under the aspect of rhythm we\ncannot properly speak of poetical or prose\nform as visible in writing, since speech, in\nwhatever form be it written, is always ame-\nnable to measured as well as to ordinary\ndiction.\nPOETICAL RHYTHM FORMS\nTO BE MET WITH IN PRACTICE.\n36. - Since the poetical rhythm-form of a\nliterary piece is determined by the interplay\nof pure-rhythm laws, and the laws of speech,\nit is different for each piece, so that no list\nof pre established schemes can possibly be\ngiven. Yet, in that interplay, we shall di-\nstinguish three phases, to one of which any\ngiven form can be ascribed.\n37. - First phase. — The members of speech\nare moulded upon the pattern of a pure-rhythm\nscheme.\na) Syllables are moulded upon measures :\nThis happens very frequently, as it is\nrather easy to arrange the speech so as to\nhave a set of syllable-words that can be made\n\n(!) We feel we must apologize for atrociously spoi-\nling the first line in Kipling's Mandalay. We took the\nliberty of so doing, as the example suited our present\npurpose, to perfection.\n(1) MARLOW'S Passionate Shepherd."}, {"page_pdf": 83, "page_imprimee": "171", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.83", "texte": "to last one measure each, withont loss of ;\nnatural diction. 1\nb) Words are moulded upon feet:\nThis is not so easy, as it is often impos-\nsible to arrange the speech so as to have a\nset of words identical in number of syllables,\nnatural quantity and accent.\nc) Phrases are moulded upon metres :\nEx: The longer 1 life, the more of || fence ;\nThe more of | fence, the greater |J pain,\nThe greater pain, the less de | fence,\nThe less de fence, the greater | gain<2>.\nd) Clauses are moulded upon verses:\nEx. Open the temple-gates unto my [j love,\nOpen them wide that she may enter || in;\nAnd all the posts adorn as doth be || hove,\nAnd all the pillars deck with garlands ||\ntrim\nThis case is extremely common.\ne) Periods are moulded upon poiystichs :\nEx : The ghosts of Ossian skim the misty vale,\nAnd hosts of Sylphids on the moon-beam\nsail <♦>.\n/) Compound periods are moulded upon\nstanzas:\nEx: What should we talk of dainties, then,\nOr better meat than's fit for men ?\nThese are but vain; that's only good\nWhich God hath blessed and sent for\nfood (5).\nThis case is normal with hardly any ex-\nception.\n38. - Second phase. — Speech members\nare no longer moulded upon the pattern of\na pure rhythm-scheme, yet the latter is still\npartly made perceptible through rhyme. Rhyme\nis an assimilation of sounds under the aspect\nof quality. It is chiefly employed as a factor\nof unitary perception; but this point does not\nconcern us here, as it has nothing to do with\nrhythm.\nRhyme is also used to mark the end of\na rhythm-member, generally a verse (,). Then\nits office is akin to that of accent; in fact,\nit might be called a quality accent.\na) Verses are made perceptible through\nrhyme:\n39. - Third phase. — Rhyme having dis-\nappeared, pure I-rhythm members no longer\nretain a means of their own through which\nto make themselves perceptible side by side\nwith speech-members.\nThat means that one of the two rhythm-\npatterns must be sacrificed. Which shall it\nbe? If we give up speech-rhythm, we betray\na tendency towards a uni-lateral notion of\n\n(1) DRYDEN'S, Alexander's Feast.\n(2) WYATT. One might object that these are clau-\nses, not phrases. That is true; yet rhythmically speaking,\nthe place of a phrase is sometimes taken up by a clause.\n(3) SPENSER. The Bridal Day.\n(4) H. K. WHITE. Clifton Grove.\n(5) RALEIGH. Answer to Marlow's 'Passionate\nShepherd.\n(1) See POE. The Rationale of Verse, etc.\np. 232.\n(2) MILTON. II penseroso. In order to make speech-\nmembers clearly seen, we begin a new line at each\nclause.\n(3) J. MONTGOMERY. Religion."}, {"page_pdf": 84, "page_imprimee": "172", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.84", "texte": "poetical art, that is, towards considering it as\nbeing outside the pale of ideas, and akin to\ninstrumental music. So it seems that the\nadvisability of abandoning pure rhythm may\nbe taken for granted.\nYet, shall a poet take pains to cut his\nsentences into an elaborate system of lines\nand use a number of otherwise totally unne-\ncessary capitals, only to give his readers the\ntrouble of undoing his work ? The argument\nis a strong one ; yet it can be reversed. Shall\na poet—Milton for instance, — carefully break\nhis lines and build up their fragments into\nspeech-members of ever-changing length, that\nthe reader may do his best to merge that\nbeautiful variety into a monotonous sequence\nof iambic pentameters ? If a poet desires a\npure-rhythm scheme to be perceptible in his\nwork, let him make it tally with his speech-\nmembers.\n40. -In the following examples, the no-\ntation is calculated to give prominence to\nspeech-rhythm only. Pure-rhythm schemes,\nwhen existing, have been disregarded.\nPolystichs are separated from each other\nby means of a blank line.\nCaesurae are marked, when necessary, by\nmeans of blank measures <x).\n41. - Example I.\n\n(1) It might be objected that, while our notation\nshows exactly the duration of the time-interval between\nany two successive accents, it possesses no signs to mark\nsyllable-quantity, such as, for instance, are suggested in\nthe above quoted \" Report of the Committee on Metri-\ncal Notation. \"To justify this want, we give the follow-\ning reasons. On the one hand, we think a syllable-\nquantity notation is unnecessary. What is indispensable\ncan be shown by the position of the measure-signs. For\nthe rest, the reader will be guided by good natural dic-\ntion (27). On the other hand, we fear that any such\nnotation would either prove confusingly complex, or fall\nshort of precision.\n(!) HAMLET, III, 1."}, {"page_pdf": 85, "page_imprimee": "173", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.85", "texte": "43. - If we compare the two last examples,\nthe first of which was written by the poet in\nthe manner peculiar to the pure-rhythm scheme\ncalled iambic pentameter, the second in the\none peculiar to prose, we get further evidence\nof what was stated at No. 35: namely, that\ndiction, as marked by us, does not, as far\nas rhythm is concerned, afford any ground for\ndistinguishing prose form from poetical form.\nThe rhythm features of the two are the same:\nmeasure-accent isochronism maintained throu-\nghout, foot-accent isochronism seldom inter-\nrupted, metre-accent isochronism broken oftener,\nverse-accent isochronism all but wanting, po-\nlystich-accent isochronism wanting altogether.\nIt is true that in the second example, we\noften find a syllable lasting two measures,\nwhereas in the first, that happens only once.\nYet such cases, as well as the opposite ones\nof one measure filled up with several syllables,\nare extremely frequent in numerous poems\nunmistakably written in what is usually called\n44. - We shall conclude our study by ob-\nserving that the same has enabled us to take\na bird's-eye view of the whole range of pos-\nsible poetical rhythm forms, from those through\nwhich unity alone is best expressed, and which\ncan be realized only with the help of pure\nsound in instrumental music, (18) to some\nchosen from actual literature, among such as\nbest embody multiplicity. (41-42).\nThe search for and analysis of particular\nforms, together with the examination of their\naesthetic worth, cannot be the object of an\nessay on general principles.\nYet, let us state a fundamental rule: The\nbetter a rhythmic form unites harmoniously\nwell-balanced expression of unity and multi-\nplicity with clearness and power of speech\nthe higher its literary merit will be.\n\n(1) TAGORE. Gitanjali, 2.\n(1) E. BARRETT-BROWNING, A musical instrument.\n(2) HAMLET, III, 1.\no ADDITIONAL WORKS TO BE CONSULTED, O\nABERCROMBIE Lascelles. 'Principles of Prosody, (1923).\nANDREW. Writing and Reading of VerseI\nBAUM P. F. The Principles of English Versification,\nCambridge, Harv. Univ. Press, 1922.\nDABNEY J. P. Musical Basis of Verse. Longmans, 1901,\nGOUJON H. L'Expression du Rhytme Mental dans la\nM&lodie et la Parole. Paris, Paulin, 1907.\nGUEST E. History of English Rhythm ; London, 1882.\nLANIER. Science of English Verse, (1880).\nMAYOR J. H. Chapters on English Metre. Macmillan,l 901.\nOMOND, Study of Metre, (1903).\nOLIVERO F. II ritornello e la Ripetizione in E. A. Poe, in\n\" Studi sul Romanticism© inglese Bari, Laterza, 1914.\nSAINTSBURY, History of English Prosody. Macmillan*\nSCHIPPER J. A History of English Versification. Cla-\nrendon Press, 1910.\nSTEWART G. R. A Method toward the Study of Di~\npodic Verse, in \" Publications of The Modern Lan-\nguage Association of America Vol. XXXIX, No. 4,\nDecember 1924.\nSTEWART G. R. Modern Metrical Technique, (1922).\nTHOMSON William. The Rhythm of Speech.\nVERRIER. Metriqne Anglaise, (1909)."}, {"page_pdf": 86, "page_imprimee": "174", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.86", "texte": "THE PRETTY\nTHEATRE\n\nPART THREE\n\n(1)\nA LETTER FROM MLLE. GU1MARD TO M. DE\nLE FERTE INTEND ANT DES MENUS-PL AISIRS.\nLondres 26 may 1786 or 1787. (2)\nOn ne fait pas toujours ce que Von de-\nsire, mon cher petit bon ami, et fen ay bien\nla preuve, puisque malgrd celui que favois\nde vous icrire, des mon arrivee a Londres, je\nn'en ay pu trouver le moment. Mais Vami-\ntie est indulgente, et je compte trop sur la\nvotre pour ne pas etre convaincue quelle ne\nvous permettra pas d'etre injuste envers moi\nen vous laissant prendre pour negligence une\nimpossibility reelle.\nDepuis que je suis en cette ville on ne\nm'a pas encore laisse un seul instant de libre,\ncomblee des bontes de toutes les plus grandes\ndames, et principalement de M™e la duchesse\nde Devonshire. Je passe chez elle tout temps,\nou je ne suis pas employee au thiatre. En\nVerite, mon cher petit bon ami, la maniere\ndont on me recoit partout est si flatteuse quelle\npourroit bien faire tourner une tete moins sen-\nsee que celle de votre petite bonne amie,\nmais elle est ci'une trop rare bonte pour\npas a Vabri de toute epreuve. Vous allez en\njuger par les sages reflexions que ses nouveaus\nsucces lui ont fait faire, et dont elle va vous\nfaire part.\nJ'ai pense que je ne pouvois profiter\ncirconstance plus favorable pour terminer\nlamment ma carrieretheatrale, et je vous crois\ntrop mon ami pour ne pas approuver la re-\nsolution que je prends de quitter I'Opera.\nVous n'ignorez pas, que depuis quelque temps,\nil est devenu le centre des cabales, par con-\nsequent du mauvais gout, les perruquiers, les\nlaquais, sont devenus les juges des talents, les\nmiens n'ont jamais du leurs succes qua la\nbonne compagnie, et je ne veux pas risquer\nde devenir la pdture de celle dont on remplit\npresentement le parterre. II me seroit trop dur,\napres ving-cinq ans de suffrages bien soutenus,\nde finir par eprouver des desagrements, et\nparmi mes chers comarades, fen connois qui\nsont remplis de bonnes sur le chapi-\ntre. Or, comme dans tous les temps je n'ai\njamais cherche qua faire plaisir,]e\ntre le comble a mes procedds pour eux en\ndonnant ma demission. Disposes de ma place\nmon ami, mais si vous voules ecouter les con-\nseils de I'amitie, ne la donnes qu'au talent et\nnon a la protection ni au charlatanisme. Je\nvous le repete, il est tres dangereux de don-\nner legerement des premieres places, attendu\nque I'on n est plus matt de les oter aux\nsujets que Von a rendus pcssesseurs quand on\nfinit par voir clairement ne sont en etat\nde les remplir. II faut encourager les jeunes\nsujets en les recompensant bien. Soyez liberal\nen argent, mais avare des premieres places,\nsi vous volez ne pas fermer la porte de\n1'Opera aux vrais talents qui pourroient les\nmeriter. Excusez, mon . ami, si je vous donne\ndes conseils, mais c'est mon pour vous\nqui me les diete, ainsyque le desir que j'ay\nde ne pas voir detruire la belle\ndanse que j'ai Vu exister a I'Opera.\nOn m'a mande que vous aviez suspendu\n1'arret du conseil qui retablissoit les feux, fen\nsuis vraiment fachee; vous savez que je vous\nai toujours dit qu'il n'y avoit que ce moyen\nde retablir le bon ordre dans le service de\nI'Opera. On est bien plus empresse a remplir\nson devoir quand 1' interet est attache, et la\ncertitude de toucher son argent, tous les mois,\nsans nulle espece de conventions, rend bien\ndes sujets infiniment paresseux. Je tiens toujours\naux feux, sans eux cela ira toujours mal.\nJ'ai encore une grace a solliciter de votre\namitie, mon ami, c'est de permettre a\nvelon de tester a Londres jusqu'a la Jin du\nmois prochain. Independamment du service qui\nvous me rendrez en me laissant ce danseur,\nvous lui en rendrez aussi un bien grand, car\nil a paru un libelle a Paris, et il est accuse\nd'y etre pour quelques chose. On ma mande\nainsi qua lui quil etoit attendu a Paris par\nplusieurs mauvaises tetes de la cour et qu'on\nvouloit le rosser. Ce seroit une chose\ncheuse pour lui, qui (fen suis persuaded) ne\nle merite pas. Vous seul, mon ami, pouves le\nsoustraire a cette mauvaise affaire, en lui per-\nmettant de passer encore cinq semaines a Lon-\ndres. Dans cet intervalle, le tetes se calmeront\net a son retour on ne pensera plus au libelle.\nAccordes - moi cette grace, mon ami, fen\n\n(1) For parts 1. and 2 see \" The Mask October\n1924 and January 1925.\n(2) There is no date to the letter."}, {"page_pdf": 87, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.87", "texte": "THE PRIVATE THEATRE OF MADEMOISELLE GUIMARD.\nBuilt in 1772 by Architect Le Doux in her house. Inaugurated on December 8th\nwith Collè's \"La Partie de Chasse d' Henri IV\" followed by \"Pygmalion\".\nPlate 13.\n\nTHE MASK\n1925"}, {"page_pdf": 89, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.89", "texte": "GROUND PLAN OF THE PRIVATE THEATRE OF\nMADEMOISELLE GUIMARD.\nPlate 14.\n\nTHE MASK\ni925"}, {"page_pdf": 91, "page_imprimee": "n. p.", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.91", "texte": "A PRETTY THEATRE. PROJECT FOR A HOUSE FOR Mme. LA COMTESSE\nDU BARRY (1768-69): Architect LE DOUX.\nThe Theatre in this project of 1768-69 should be compared with that built by Le Doux\nfor La Guimard 1772 on a piece of this ground along the Chaussèe d'Antin. Compare\nalso with the Private Teatro of Cardinal Ottoboni built by Juvarra some seventy\nyears earlier in Roma, about 1705. (See Plate 2. The Mask, January. 7925)."}, {"page_pdf": 93, "page_imprimee": "177", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.93", "texte": "conserverai une bien vice reconnaissance, at-\ntendu quelle m arrangera aussi parfaitement\npuisque je viens de contracter, pour ces cinq\ndernieres semaines, un engagement de 650\nguindes qui, joints aux 950 que j'ai faites a\nmon bdndfice, me forment une tres jolie somme\na rapporter a Paris. Ce voyage na pas ete\nsi bete, hein! qu'en penses-vous? Dame, ce\nnest pas ma faute. lis m aiment a la folie,\nces bons Anglais ! Voila ce que c'est que le\nmerite !\nAh! ca, monsieur mon cher petit bon ami,\naimes - moi toujours bien, et autant que je\nvous aime, entendes - vous ? - moi, je\nvous en prie, et dites que vous me\nlaisses Nivelon. Vous nous rendrez service a\ntous les deux, et vous etes trop obligeant pour\nrefuser a votre petite bonne amie, qui vous\nembrasse de tout coeur.\nGUIMARD.\nMes respects je vous prie a Mme de la\nFerte ainsi qua Mme Desentelles, sans m'ou-\nblier aupres de son chaste epoux.\nMlle Sauniere vous porter a les commis-\nsions dont Mlle de la Bourdonnais m'avait\nchargde pour vous remettre.\nPall Mall No. 10.\nYOU remember this letter which is quoted\nby M. Edmond de Goncourt in the\n62nd paragraph of his delightful book on the\nfamous dancer.\nIt is a distinguished neatly written (l)\nexample of the usual theatric communications\nof all time which say \"1 am a great success\nbecause I am sought after for my art by great\npersons \" and which add \" I have made a\ngreat deal of money \".\nSometimes it is less studied as in the case\nof the fortunate dancer Mile. Boubon, when\nshe writes from London to the Hairdresser Al-\nbert of the Rue des Petits Champs saying \" Send\nme two more boxes of the Powder you keep\nfor the Princess Lamballe, for I am going to\ntake tea on the 1st of next month with the\nhighest personage in British Navy; one writes\nit so: Mr Midshipman and he has promised\nme the most sumptuous banquet of fish—\nthey call them les shrimps. I must not fail\nto appear a I'A Ibert and 1 pray youx not to\nforget, by the 1st of the month \".\nMile. Guimard as we see from her let-\nter was not left alone for an instant by the\ngreat ladies—in fact the Duchess of De-\nvonshire keeps her close to her all the time\nshe is not in the Theatre. Fortunate Duchess\nto be able to afford it—for Mile. Guimard's time\nwill cost the Duchess, or anybody else, money.\nThat is what is so admirable about La\nGuimard : she really did know how to make\nthe Pretty Theatre pay. Only one woman\never surpassed her in this.... the immense\nMile. Montansier; but then Mile. Montansier\nsurpassed every theatrical one in every thea-\ntrical thing, and for this became the head\nand front of the Pretty Theatre: there was\nnone like her, none. And some wretches even\nadded \" Thank God *\\\nBut La Guimard ran her close—was less\nof an agent and more or less of a free lance.\nShe seems to have managed to raise all\nher funds without bothering about any chorus,\nthat chorus on which la Montansier counted\nso greatly.\nAnd in 1772 to assist her to raise funds,\nshe persuaded one or more wealthy gentlemen\nto build h§r a maison. This Maison de\nMile. Guimard she sold in 1786: she sold it\nby lottery, 2500 tickets at 120 livres (so they\nsay ; others say 5 livres) a-piece were issued,\nsigned by Mile. Guimard and vised by\nM. Chavet the notary of Rue St. Martin. The\nlucky person to get the house for 120 livres\n(or for 5) for she bought but one ticket, was\nthe Comtesse du Langin who resold the place\nfor 500,000 francs to the banker Perregaux.\nThis house contained a little private Thea-\ntre from the designs of Architect Le Doux:\na jewel of a Theatre: a casket: able to hold\n500 spectators. The ceiling was painted by\nTaraval, the panels by Fragonard, the skirting\nboard by the great David. To the perfor-\nmances given here came every admirer of La\nGuimard and The Pretty Theatre. The re-\npertoire has been collected under the title\n\" Theatre d'Amour \".\nAssisting her would be Mile. Dervieux,\nMile. Duthe and other talented persons. La\nGuimard could hardly be described as pretty,\nbut, like Ophelia when mad, she, when sane,\nturned things to favour and to prettiness.\n{To be continued) %\n\n(1) It lies on my table as I write this, and every\nconsonant and every vowel in it breathe the practical\nbusiness woman.\n\nX. Y. Z."}, {"page_pdf": 94, "page_imprimee": "178", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.94", "texte": "THE COMEDIE FRANQAISE\nIN PARIS.\nA PILGRIMAGE TO THE THEATRE AND A\nRECORD OF DISCOVERIES MADE IN THE\nBUILDING OF THE OLDEST EXISTING\nTHEATRE IN FRANCE.\nBy Barrett H. Clark. Illustrations by Oliver W. Larkin.\n\nFacade of the Theatre during the 18th\nCentury. After an old engraving in\nl' Encyclopèdie.\n\nfind that one house in every five, at a\nconservative estimate, ought to have its\ndistinguishing badge (J). If all these hou-\nses were purchased by the State and\nconverted into museums the people of\nParis would have to move to the\ncountry ; this is the reason, or one of\nthe reasons, why many a landlord has\nrefused to claim a noble lineage for his\nproperty. One in particular has effected\nwhat is really a posthumous eviction.\nI now write in the house where\nRacine lived during the last six years\nof his life, where Clairon lived for\nthirty, where Adrienne Lecouvrear met\nher tragic death, and where Voltaire\nwas a frequent visitor. Before me are\ndocuments proving these facts, but the\nlandlord, having hidden his marble\ntablet in the cellar, points down the\nstreet to No. 13, telling his illustrious\ntenants that they must apply elsewhere\nfor admission; he will have none of\nthem. For some time, (until there was\nsome talk in the Chamber of Deputies\nof purchasing such houses at a nominal\nsum) this, same landlord was proud to\nshow visitors the room in which he\nwas 44 sure the author of 4 Ph£dre *\nbreathed his last, \" and he would\ndoubtless have written indignant letters\nto the papers protesting against any\nupstart historian who dared question\nthe authenticity of the Hotel de Ranes.\nBut now it is different I\nNext door is the house, undistin-\nguished by any tablet, where Balzac\nlived as printer and publisher; you\nmay have your shoes half-soled under\nits eaves. Five minutes* walk from\nthere you may buy peas and onions in\nthe (unmarked) mansion where Lau-\nrence Sterne lived and wrote part of\nthe 44 Sentimental Journey **. Without\nknowing it you may sleep in Synge's\nroom for seven francs a night, rent Tur-\ngenev*s apartment, have breakfast in\nFlaubert's library, and drink an aperitif\nat the same bar over which Verlaine\nreceived his absinthe. All this is very\nTHAT practical common sense for\nwhich the French are celebrated is\nseen to best advantage in the use to\nwhich the nation has put her shrines\nand public monuments. The unin-\nformed tourist who has visited the\nLouvre and paid his respects to the\nVictor Hugo house in the Place des\nVosges is wont to imagine that every\nother double-starred attraction has like-\nwise been converted into a museum\nand cared for by the State. As he\nwanders through the streets, reading\nthe marble tablets that mark the house\nwhere 44 Alfred de Musset, born at\nsuch a place on such a day, died, \"\nor where Th£ophile Gautier spent two\nyears of his life, he is likely to be\nimpressed with the idea that the French\nare an altogether pious people of cul-\ntured historians, guardians of a brilliant\npast, eager to perpetuate in marble the\nlandmarks that recall an illustrious past.\nThe sentimental tourist, asl Henry\nJames would have called him, does not\nknow, however, that the houses now\ndistinguished by the familiar yellow\ntablet represent possibly less than one\npercent of the total that deserve com-\nmemoration. Let him enquire into the\nhistory of the houses in but a single\nold street in Paris and he will soon\npleasant and as it should be; the Pa-\nrisian cannot be expected to turn his\ncity into a museum; after all, Balzac\nand Voltaire and the rest are dead,\nand the butcher and post-card vendor\nmust live.\nTHE OLD STAGE IN PARIS.\nThere is one such monument of\nwhich I would try to render some\naccount, for it cannot long survive the\nuses to which it has been put. Were\nit not that the stage, and the shell at\nleast of the whole structure of the old\nCom£die Frangaise were still in exis-\ntence, the statement that Paris has no\nold theatres would be quite true. The\nstatement was made not long ago by\nan authority on stage history that the\noldest theatre in Paris dates only from\nthe end of the eighteenth century. The\nruin I am to tell about dates from the\nseventeenth (2).\nThe remains of what was for a\nhundred years the most brilliant, most\nimportant and most celebrated theatre\nin Europe, may be seen to-day not\nfifty yards from the* Boulevard St.\nGermain. The somewhat modernized\nfacade is distinguished from a row of\nsimilar facades by a tablet, now yellow\nwith age and all but undecipherable,\non which you may read that this is\n\n(i) See Volume Xf No. 3. TurgoVs\nPlan de Paris.\n(2) It has still older ruins, What we\nexpect (and we find in Italy alone) are\nthe Theatres of the 16th and iyth centu+\nries in fit working order. (Editor).\n\nFaçade of the Theatre as it actually is.\nView from the Cafè Procope."}, {"page_pdf": 95, "page_imprimee": "179", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.95", "texte": "the 44 former Hotel of the Comddiens\nFrangais, ** and that it was occupied\nby the King's Troupe between 1689\nand 1770. The wooden stage, inside\nstands almost as it stood when the\nTroupe moved to better quarters a\nhundred and fifty years ago. The\noriginal balconies and corridors have\nbeen made over into apartments, and\nthe parterre—or pit—is at present an\nopen courtyard. The stage and dres-\nsing rooms, fly galleries and loft above\nhave all been converted into store-\nrooms and offices for the use of a\nwholesale book distributor.\nThere are people working from\nmorning to night on the stage where\nClairon and Lecouvreur, Mol6 and\nLekain achieved fame; there are fa-\nmilies living in rooms the floors of\nwhich have been trod by Rousseau,\nDiderot, Voltaire and Beaumarchais,\ncooking their meals in kitchens once\noccupied by boxes where sat the kings\nof France—and their mistresses. The\nstairs up which Voltaire climbed to\ndiscuss with Clairon the play he was\nwriting and the very dressing-room in\nwhich that imperious minx received\nher illustrious admirers, are now used\nby porters bearing heavy boxes of books\nand made into platforms for the storing\nof old furniture and discarded office\nsupplies. With one exception, no one\nof all 1 addressed in the building knew\nthat he was rubbing elbows with the\nghosts of the past, and no one seemed\nto care.\nIt was by accident that I learned\nof the existence of the stage of the old\nCom£die. I had indeed often noticed\nthe tablet, but I assumed that the\nbuilding had been erected over the spot\nonce occupied by the theatre, and was\nnot, indeed, the famous building itself.\nTREADING HALLOWED\no GROUND. o\nOne day it occurred to me to enter\nthe courtyard of No. 14 Rue de\n1'Ancienne Com£die. The illustrator\nof these notes had armed himself with\na ground plan of the structure as it\nexisted in the middle of the eighteenth\ncentury, and together we succeeded in\nidentifying air the important parts of\nthe stage and 44 house \" that have been\npermitted to remain.\nPassing the concierge's door we\nenter the courtyard, the ground of\nwhich, now covered with cobblestones,\nmarks the exact location of the old\nparterre. This is a space twenty-seven\nby thirty-five feet square, formerly\nroofed in; now, of course, there is\nonly the open sky. At the other end\nof the court, facing us as we enter,\nis a series of three high windows and\na glazed door which, when thrown\nopen in warm weather, allows us to\nsee the stage opening as it was 200\nyears ago. On the occasion of our\nfirst visit the snow was falling, to that\nit was necessary to knock at the door.\nNo one answers our summons and\nwe walk boldly in. The floor, we\nperceive, is modem, but just under it\nis another, of solid oak planks; the\noriginal stage. Through packing boxes\nand heaps of books we are able to\nobserve the slant of the floor, a con-\nsiderable grade from the highest point\nup-stage right down to the curtain line.\nWe ask an employee for permis-\nsion to 44 look around \"—we are stu-\ndents of the French theatre and would\nlike to make a few sketches of this\nstage. The employee knows nothing of\nany stage and informs us that it is\nforbidden to enter. Since, however,\nwe have already entered, he is a little\nperplexed—he knows no regulations\nbeyond the first, but takes it upon\nhimself to tell us that we must make\nformal application to the owner. We\nnext ask whether it is forbidden to\nlook elsewhere. Oh, not at ail-outside\nhis own precincts we are quite at\nliberty I One takes the small stairway\nto the right.\nThe stairway, we see, proclaims its\nauthenticity by the style of its iron\nrailings and the size and shape, of the\nterra cotta tiles. We refer to our plan\nand identify it as one of two that gave\naccess on the first floor to two stage\nboxes, on the next to the actors'\ndressing rooms, and at the top to the\ngalleries over the stage. Nothing re-\nmains of the stage boxes except two\nplatforms, now used as store-rooms.\nThe dressing rooms, what is left of\nthem, are used as cloak rooms for the\nclerks. We mount to the second\nstory—which is, by European count,\nthe third, and, from behind a modern\ntemporary wall running round a large\noffice, we cat-ch sight of the ends of\nhuge beams supporting the roof.\nThe office occupies the greater part\nof the space once used for manipula-\nting such scenery as was used in\nelaborate productions. As we look out\nof the windows into the courtyard we\nare standing immediately over the old\nproscenium arch, and the solid beams\nthat formed its basis are now used to\nsupport the new floor. The windows\nthat allow us a view of the 4 4 house \"\nhave of course been put in during the\n- last century.\nA young man in the office appears\nto understand the object of our visit\nand one is not surprised to learn that he\nis working in a theatre. It is through\nhis courtesy and interest that we are\nallowed to break the rules of the house\nand descend to the floors below. We\nnow go down the stairway to the left.\nFrom this side the actors' dressing rooms\nhave entirely disappeared ; nothing re-\nmains but the floors, which are utilized\nfor some dark purpose which we are\nunable to fathom. Reaching the floor\nimmediately below, we stand in a\ngallery that was used by the manipu-\nlators of lights and of the elaborate\nscenery that was introduced after the\nmiddle of the eighteenth century. This\ngallery is about fourteen feet above the\nlevel of the stage and extends around\nthree sides of it. On a level with the\neye are small modern windows set in\njust above the bottom of the old\nproscenium opening. Between the floor\nof this gallery and that of the office\nabove—a space of less than eight\nfeet—is a forest of beams and rafters,\nuntouched, even by paint, since 1770.\nOn some of the cross beams overhead\nwe discover wooden pulleys used for\nraising and lowering stage-sets. Some\nof these are all but hidden by the\ninnumerable book bins and packing\nboxes, the weight of which threatens\nthe collapse of the entire gallery.\nONTO THE FORBIDDEN STAGE.\nWe now descend into the forbidden\narea of the stage itself. Here again\nare book bins and boxes, stoves, a small\n\n17th Century Staircase leading to the\nDressing-rooms. The door gives accesa\nto the Stage."}, {"page_pdf": 96, "page_imprimee": "180", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.96", "texte": "The stage as it looks today from the\nGallery above it.\n\nelevator and many desks. We peer\ninto dark corners, measuring distances\nand deciphering our plan, and discover\nthat this space is practically intact;\nnothing has been done to the stage\nexcept to encumber it with the para-\nphernalia of a combined storeroom and\noffice. Take down the glass doorsy seal\nup the modern windows, clear out the\nbooks, desks and inclosed offices, and\nyou might produce a play before an\naudience standing, as audiences did, in\nthe pit, out in the open courtyard.\nLet us leave the stage for a mo-\nment and step into the street. The\nfacade is that of the ordinary seven-\nteenth century house, not appreciably\ndifferent from many another in the\nneighborhood.\nA new story has been added to the\nold structure, or rather the original\nmansards have been incorporated into\na new top story. The little shops\noccupying the ground floor were for-\nmerly used as entrances and ticket\nwindows. In the front part of the\nbuilding—between the street and the\ncourtyard—there is a staircase which\ngave access to the second and third\ntiers of boxes.\nOn the death of Moli&re in 1673,\nthe troupe he had organized and trained\nwas expelled from the Palais-Cardinal\n(now the Palais-Royal) at the instiga-\ntion of the composer Lully. Lully\nhad his own theatre at the time in\nthe Rue de Vaugirard, but feeling that\nhe was out of the fashionable district\nhe insisted on appropriating the theatre\nin which his old rival had found fame\nand success.\nMoli&re's successor, Lagrange, is\nforced to look for a new home. He\nfinds a tennis court in the Rue des\nFosses de Nesle (now the Rue Ma-\nzarine). This tennis court is converted\ninto a theatre, and the old Moli&re\ntroupe, joining forces with the Com£-\ndiens du Marais, sets up business for\na short time as the Theatre Gu£n£gaud.\nIn 1680 Louis XIV. issues a decree\nconsolidating the actors of the Th&tre\nGu6n6gaud with those of the Hotel\nde Bourgogne. It is this famous decree\nthat marks the establishment of the\ntheatre now known as the Com6die-\nFrangaise, or the Theatre-Frangais.\nIn his will Cardinal Mazarin had\nestablished the College des Quatre\nNations. The college occupied the\nground now marked by the cupola of\nthe Institute. Unfortunately for the\ncomedians, their theatre was just 200\nyards from the sacred precincts of the\ncollege. Complaints were made and\nin 1687 Louis issued another decree\nrequiring the actors to seek other\nquarters. The next move was to a\npoint not three minutes walk up the\nsame street toward what is now the\nBoulevard St. Germain, to another\ntennis court, evidently outside the zone\nwhere the college youths were allowed\nto wander The Jeu de paume de\nl'Etoile occupied an irregularly shaped\nplot of ground between the old Rue\ndes Foss6s-Saint-Germain-des-pr£s and\ntwo houses on the old Rue des Mauvais\ngargons. The Rue des Foss6s is now\nthe Rue de Fancienne Com6die, the\nother is the Rue Gr£goire-de-Tours.\nThe architect, Francois d'Orbay, set to\nwork filling the old spaces at his\ndisposal and in 1689 the new theatre\ninaugurated the most brilliant period of\nits long career with a performance of\nRacine's \" Phidre \" and\n\" Medecin malgr£ lui \".\nThe theatre was considered one of\nthe most magnificent buildings of Europe.\nThe \" house \" included three balconies\nof loges, not including the stage boxes\nand benches on the stage itself. It is\nsaid that 2,000 spectators could be\naccommodated. This seems an exag-\ngeration, though it must be borne in\nmind that there were no seats in the\nparterre, and that many hundreds can\nbe crowded into a space 850 feet\nsquare. Besides, there is no reason to\nbelieve that 250 years ago the French\nnation was any more particular about\nthe comfort of its audiences than it is\nnow. The parterre gods of the day,\ncalled \" Knights of the Chandelier \"\nbecause of the huge cluster of wax\ncandles that dripped grease into the\npit, were so tightly fitted into their\npen as to make it impossible to faint\nwith decency when the air became, as\nit often did, overheated. The Theatre\ndes Vari6t£s, now doing business on\nthe Boulevards, has been modeled, so\nfar as crowding and ventilation are\nconcerned, on the old Com£die Fran-\ngaise.\nLet us now return to the stage.\nLook for a moment at the accompa-\nnying diagram, a copy of the -sketch\nmade by the architect Biondel in 1752.\nWith the exception of the beams that\nsupport the galleries just over the stage,\nthe two stairways (B and C), and the\ntwo wooden walls (A), little of the\nstructure of the upper part of the stage\nremains.\nThe long double lines to the right\nand left of the open part of the stage\n(marked U) mark the position of rail-\nings behind which, indicated by a\nseries of lines, were the stage benches.\nThese benches were the occasion of\none of the most interesting episodes of\nstage history, and this particular stage\nwas the scene of a drama more eventful\nthan most of the tragedies enacted\nupon it.\nYou will notice that the open space\nbetween the railings is very small com-\npared with the total area behind the\ncurtain line (D). The stage benches\nand boxes below them occupied all\nthe floor space except an opening fifteen\nfeet wide at the curtain and eleven\nup-stage. The benches were the most\ndesirable places in the theatre, and\nwere occupied by the rich merchants,\nthe nobility and others who wished to\nshow themselves to the 44 house #\\\n44 During the entire evening of a\nperformance \", says one writer, 44 there\nwas not a moment's silence on the\nstage, even during the most affecting\ntragic scenes. Rich merchants, witty\npetits-maitrcs, entered and left, followed\nby servants in elaborate attire, bustled\nto and fro, talked and joked, while\nthe actors endeavored to drown out\nthe confusion and attract the attention\nof the audience \".\nDramatists bitterly complain of the\nnuisance: Cr£biIIon cites the case of a\n\nPlan of the Stage. 1752. After an\nEngraving by Biondel."}, {"page_pdf": 97, "page_imprimee": "181", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.97", "texte": "well dressed young man who entered\nafter the curtain had risen; as he was\nlooking for his seat the audience ima-\ngined him to be the lover in the play,\nVoltaire never wearies of repeating that\nhe is forced to write his plays with a\nview to the convenience of the spec-\ntators on the benches, and must often\neliminate an effective scene because it\nwould be ridiculed by the petits-maitres.\nIndeed, that strict adherence to the\nunities which every self-respecting eigh-\nteenth century dramatist is everlastingly\npreaching about is attributable in large\nmeasure to the cramped stage of the\nConfedie. What was worse, no actor\nwas ever free of interruption and few\nplays escaped a shower of comments\nfrom the benches.\nTHE NUISANCE SIDE OF\no PLAYGOING. o\nAs we look down from the dusty\nplatform that surrounds the stage on\nthree sides it is almost impossible to\nconceive the narrowness of the space\nat the disposal of the old actors.\nThere where the bookkeeper now sits\nin his glass cage were rows of benches,\nand this side of the elevator shaft marks\nthe railing of the benches on the left.\nIt must have been at the very spot\nwhere now hangs a 44 No Smoking \"\nsign that a certain actor, playing the\npart of a messenger in a pseudo-Roman\ntragedy, arrived at a critical moment\nand found his way blocked by spec-\ntators. The actors down-stage waited\nfor his entrance and cue, and could\nnot continue. A tense moment, relieved\nimmediately after by a clarion voice\nfrom the pit:\n44 Make way for the messenger! \"\nWhat matter if the scene was spoiled !\nThis intolerable nuisance was borne\nfor over a hundred years, just as the\ninnumerable abuses of to-day are borne\nand will continue to be borne—for\nfinancial reasons* Everyone knows that\ngoing to the theatre in Paris is an\nordeal, but so long as the public is\nwilling to pay ushers for the privilege\nof being shown to the wrong seat, no\nchange will be made.\nSo it was with the benches, only\nin that case it was the actors who\nbenefited, and not, as to-day, the\nmanagers. However, in 1759 the\nCount de Lauraguais offered the means\nof effecting an immediate reform. H/s\ndrew up a report which he submitted\nto the court, and was permitted to pay\nfor the renovation of the stage. At a\ncost of 60,000 livres the stage was\nfinally cleared of the benches. The\nfirst performance on the new stage was\ndesigned to show what could be done\nunder conditions allowing the intro-\nduction of scenery and greater freedom\nof action to the players. Says the\nMercure de France after the opening\nnight: 44 Ijt was to be feared that the\nstage might seem too bate with no\none on it bat the actors ; however, it\nwas only necessary to witness upon it\nA comedy \", &c. The italics are mine.\nThe bench frequenters were furious\nand gathered in the old Cafe Procope,\njust opposite the theatre (and still in\nexistence) where, it is said, 44 the\nmirrors and chandeliers were the only\nsufferers \" in the row.\nIt was after 1759 that the pulleys\nfor handling scenery were installed in\nthe first gallery, of which I have already\nspoken. Just over our heads, under\nthe floor above, we discover two wooden\npulleys. On the opposite side of the\ngallery is one more, intact like the\nother two: but the fourth is gone.\nThese pulleys, 1 dare say, would not\nrevolutionize stage history; they are\ncertainly not the sort of relic the State\npreserves in glass cases but they do\nmean something. They mark an epoch,\nthey symbolize an event in theatrical\nhistory as momentous as the discovery\nof the cyclorama or the introduction\nof real water into a storm scene, and\nI think with regret of that fourth pulley\nwhich I am told, was 44 taken by the\nproprietor for his personal needs\n1 have often wondered what these\n44 personal needs \" were, and wondered\nagain how long before his 44 personal\nneeds \" will demand the utter demo~\nlition of the old building."}, {"page_pdf": 98, "page_imprimee": "182", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.98", "texte": "CORRESPONDENCE.\n\nA DICTIONARY OF THE DRAMA.\nFaithfully yours,\nOne of your Earliest Subscribers.\nTo the Editor of the Mask*\nSir :\nLAST April in an article in \" The Mask ** Professor\nAllardyce Nicoll informed us that he was engaged with\nsome twenty students in the preparation of an elaborate\nDictionary of the Drama.\nMore recently a friend sent me a four-leaf prospectus\nof Professor Nicoll's School of Dramatic Study and Re-\nsearch, and on page 2 of this I read that A Dictionary\nof British Drama is being prepared.\nI suppose these refer to one and the same work ; and\nyet what a vast difference exists twixt the subject \" Drama \"\nand the subject \" British Drama I must say I am some\nwhat disappointed.\nThe best \" Dictionary of British Drama \" that I have\ncome across was begun by Davenport Adams — (you\nhave spoken of this in \" The Mask \" already) and was\npublished by Chatto & Windus. The first and only vo-\nlume is decidedly usefull.\nI understand that much of the material for a second\nvolume has existed ever since the work was stopped by\nthe death of Mr. Davenport Adams. So that Professor\nNicoll's labours need not be as arduous as at first they\nseemed likely to be: more especially since all the facts about\nBritish Drama could get without much difficulty into two or\nthree volumes, whereas an adequate Dictionary of Euro-\npean Drama would require at least twelve volumes.\nMay 1 at the same time ask when Mr. Gordon\nCraig's School for the Art of the Theatre is going to\nreopen? It seems to some of us to be more needed than\nit ever was.\n\nFOREIGN NOTES\n\nMILANO\nO. Salamim.\nWE live in the most active city in Italy and yet we\ndo not advance very much in theatrical things. We\nare and like to remain Milanese — rather unconcerned\nas to what is going on in other places. We have our\ni eatro alia Scaia — which is larger than the Paris Opera\nHouse — and the singing is bfetter, the conductor a man\nof genius, and our direction is energetic and able. Yef\nsomehow while our work at the Scala pleases the middle\nclass shopkeeper and his family and strikes them as very\noriginal, and our old playhouse which is the perfection of\ncomfort, sanitation and regularity pleases the true Milanese\ngentiluomo we cannot exactly be said to do much in the\nf 1 .11 • \"«V\nway or brilliance.\nWe go on and on and we repeat masterpieces and do\nthem adequately — (the adequate with us is the high\nwater mark of endeavour and we are fantastically adequate)\nand oar theatre is a success, and yet something is lacking\n— a spark is lacking.\nReduce the whole proportions of this theatre to that\nof some small opera house in Voghera or Pesaro, reduce\nthe salaries and the expenses and the display and the\nnumbers of the performers, and any Milanese coming to\nour theatre wduld be in no way astonished. Toscanini\nwill always be Toscanini, that is to say, the first conductor\nof the age ; but he might be far better occupied conducting\nin a big hall like the Augusteo in Roma; in fact we are\nsure that his finer work would be heard better there.\nIn a theatre a master-conductor is more or less thrown\naway. What is needed in a theatre is the theatrical at\nits best; a musical, poetical, or a literary director is al-\nways an error.\nThere are other places for these great persons.\nThe Theatrical must dominate in a Theatre, and the\nTheatrical is, I regret to say it, the roguish ; the deity of\nthe place is not a solemn one, nor earnest, nor hectic:\nhe is easy going and nowadays a bit of a rascal.\nUnfortunately, Toscanini can never be that. He is the\nForbes Robertson of the Italian Theatre; a man who\nsomehow or other with all his immense adequacy is not\nheard at his best in the theatre.\n\nFROM LONDON.\nA leading London journal writes that a combination\nof Miss Gladys Cooper and Sir Gerald du Maurier\nin Mr, Frederick Lonsdale's new comedy 44 The Last\nof Mrs Cheyney \" may come about this season.\nIf it comes about, 44 this combination of three of the\noutstanding figures of the English Theatre \"it 44 should be\nthe big stage event of the autumn *\\\nFrom this statement one can guage how immense\nthe other events are likely to be.\n\nEric Blom in \"The Sackbut\".\nNOW THAT MADAME TUSSAUD'S IS LOST TO US,\nWHERE SHOULD WE TURN FOR AN ADEQUATE\nSUBSTITUTE, IF NOT TO COVENT GARDEN?"}, {"page_pdf": 99, "page_imprimee": "183", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.99", "texte": "DESIGN BY FAOLO PARIGI FOR THE CEREMONY OF SOME GREAT PERSON IN THE\nCAPPELLA LA URENZIANAIN F1RENZE circa\nSomething which can be described as the Ugly Theatre, The family Parigi were called upon to decorate the grievous\nspectacles as well as the gay ones. This shows hozu they treated a funeral ceremony in a Florentine Church.\nBeing a spectacle it had to be dramatic,,,, theatrical. It was not held to be in bad taste. It expressed something\nin the hearts of the Italians, a people never prone to speculate too earnestly about-no thing at the , wrong moment."}, {"page_pdf": 101, "page_imprimee": "185", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.101", "texte": "BOOK REVIEWS.\n\nTHE DANCE by Cecil Sharpe &\nA. P. Oppe. Halton & Truscott\nSmith, Ltd. London 1924. 30/- net\nTHIS is a very delightful book which\nI, for one, would have printed on\nvery much thinner paper. There is no\nother fault (if this be a fault) that I can\nfind with the work of the publishers,\nwhich is done in a lavish manner, and\nwith taste.\nWhat is said in the book is exactly\nwhat was necessary to say, namely,\nthat we have in England \" sufficient\nmaterial from which to develop a spec-\ntacular dance for the theatre which\nshall consist of movements at once na-\ntural and expressive, and possessing the\nadvantage for England that they are\ncast in the dance idiom of our own\ncountry. \" All critics having any doubts\ncould not do better than copy this\nstatement and embellish it ten or\ntwelve times in the course of each year.\nForeign dances really do deserve a rest.\nIt really is time, I think, for an En-\nglish ballet. I should hate to become\nsceptical, but I am sceptical for this\nmoment. I am sceptical when I see\na thing called the English International\nOpera Company holding itself up on\nforeign operas. It is quite absurd to\ncall something which is not English, En-\nglish. Call it what you will but do\nnot call it English- There are heaps\nof other good names. And I dread lest\nan English ballet should be grown from\nRussian seed. It would be excessively\nstupid.\nCecil Sharpe, the author of this book,\ndevoted long years of his life, with\nvery little help from others, to searching\nfor an English folk dance tradition, for\nhe felt that, if he once found it and\ncould give it shape, an English ballet\nwould in time come into being.\nI haye often imagined an English\nballet, and I have a little imagination\nand can sometimes spend half an hour\nwatching the ballets which I myself\ncreate. Do not suppose me to be one\nof those superior beings who believe\nthat all is created solely through the\nimagination. Before all, perhaps, there\nis the dancer, and I should be sorry\nfor the public to be obliged to rely on\nme to cut the capers; but I can see\nthese ballets — these English ballets.\n< I see the curtain rising, I know the\ncolour. It is not the colour of the\nRussian ballet, nor that of the French;\nit is the English colour right enough.\nI see the first movement: that is En-\nglish, too. It is quite unlike anything\nthe great Diaghilev brought to England\nfrom Russia. It is rather more easy ;\nit is about six times as healthy. There\nwas always something just a trifle sick\nabout the Russians : a certain sickness\nsoused in perfumery. Of its kind it is\nwithout question the very last word,\nbut the kind has nothing whatever to\ndo with the English ballet which, as\nyou are doubtless aware, must have a\nmelancholy all it own and a merryness\nnot necessarily noisy.\nAnd I am told that Mr. Cochran\nhas started an English ballet. Well,\nwith all due respect to Mr. Cochran,\nI very much have my doubts. Mr.\nCochran, whom I have always thought\nowed much to influence of Mr. Duveen,\nis one of the most able men in the\ndramatic world to start a limited lia-\nbility company, but an English ballet\nis not in his line. Mr. Cochran is an\nimpresario : nothing certainly less — and\nnot more. It was Mr. Cecil Sharpe who\nwas the founder of the English ballet.\nNot that his rescuscitation of the Morris\ndance means very much. It would be\na mistake to take the English Morris\ndance as revived by Mr. Sharpe too\nseriously, but there are things in it which\ncan never be taken seriously enough.\nIn a little booklet by Ralph Gardiner,\ncalled \" The English Folk Dance Tra-\ndition \", the author says that one of\nthe great projects of the English Folk\nDance Society is the creation of an\nEnglish ballet comparable to those of\nRussia and Sweden. I do not like\nthat word u project \". Neither do I\nlike the suggestion that a dance society\nis to be left to the creating of this\nlong-waited-for ballet. I would ra-\nther Mr. Gardiner created it himself;\nor, if Mr. Gardiner is not a great dan-\ncer, that he should create it together\nwith one great dancer, preferably a\nman. Now and again societies give\nus original performers but not habitually.\nThe greatest French actor of the eigh-\nteenth century, Le Kain, came from a\nprivate society theatre, but somehow I\nlook for a great dancer to appear any\nday from the ranks of a pantomine\nchorus in Huddersfield, or Nottingham,\nor Bradford. Such a man would not\nbe in love with the Russian ballet. If\nanything he would rather fear it and\nbe silent where Chelsea gushes. And\nto such a man this book by Sharpe\nwould mean very little ; and the truth\nis that all this book can do is to keep\nin front of our eyes the fact that there\nis such a thing as the dance, and that\nit was very wonderful in France, and\nwas courageous in Italy, and charming\nin Vienna. Such a book can keep\nus all talking at the dinner table. It\nis like a little illustrated programme of\nan evening's entertainment which has\nlasted nineteen centuries, gone by in a\nflash like a bicycle goes by the win-\ndow, in a flash. The nineteen centuries\nof Dance and Ballet have gone by in\nthat flash, leaving England nothing\nbehind.\nI believe that there is really some-\nthing true in the fact that one must\nbe quick to catch a thing as it is going\nby; something true in it. Of course\nif you have a policeman at the\nend of the street and you give him\nhis orders he will stop the bicycle, but\nwhat worries me is that he might not\nbe able to arrest the intelligence of a\ncouple of centuries.... still one never\nknows.\nThis book by Sharpe and Opp&\ncontains a great deal of history. A\nnumber of dates, allied with a number\nof names, and illustrated by a number\nof superb reproductions; for there are\nseventy-five plates, and seven illustra-\ntions in the text, and the four colou-\nred plates engraved and printed by\nReiach are really charming; and these\nthings all help to make it very well\nworth its price, and I bless the au-\nthors for giving us a good index.\nHas the book sold well? I hear\nso often of books that do not sell well,\nand that always makes me worry about\npaper and the binding of books; and,\nas I said at the beginning I thought\nthat this paper was rather too heavy,\ntoo rich, I must now point to an extra\nfault; I think the binding is too ex-\npensive. If paper and binding had\nbeen less, could not the book have\ncome out at half the price —at 15/ -\nSuch a price is more within the reach\nof another four or five hundred people.\nAnd, still thinking about paper and the\nbinding of books, 1 wonder if it would\nnot be possible to bring the book\nout for 5/ -, giving a little less pe -\nhaps, and certainly eliminating more an 1\nmore of the swank. It's swank tha:\ncosts such a lot nowadays. Can't gc\nto a theatre ! Why not ? Plush seats,\nBristol board programmes, one shilling.\nAxminster carpets on staircase. Two\nhundred extra lamps for the auditorium.\nCostumes for the people who show"}, {"page_pdf": 102, "page_imprimee": "186", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.102", "texte": "you into your seat. Evening dress for\nthe manager; motor car to and from\nthe place. Hoity, toity. What is the\nmeaning of all this swank ? It is not\nworth anything, and yet millions of\npounds are wasted on it. You tell me\nthat nobody would visit the not-Swanky\ntheatre, that nobody would buy swank-\nless books. I would not like you to\nconsider me at all rude, but if you are\na good friend of mine I tell you that\nyou are deluded. If you had twoo or\nthree days to spare (and if I had) I\nwould go through all the details of the\nproduction of books and the manage-\nment of theatres, and I would show\nyou step by step where all this swank\nwas unnecessary and how it totted up\nto the waste of many millions of\npounds.\nI only regret the swellness of this\nparticular book because it is a book I\nshould like to see many thousand peo-\nple possessing. The same publishers\nissue another book on 44 Old French\nline Engravings\", this they limit to\n1250 copies, and issue at three gui-\nneas and seven guineas, which seems\nto me a very proper thing to do, be-\ncause old French line engravings are\nthings which very few cultured people\nlove to ponder over; and their book\nof 44 Old French Colour Prints *\\ by\nCampbell Dodgson, also limited, is quite\nreasonable at three guineas ; but 44 The\nDance which is a popular thing, be-\nlongs to the public, and the public\nshould be able to buy all its popular\nthings very cheaply.\n\nFUCINI. NOVELLE E POESIE,\nEdited by Henry Furst D. Litt. : Uni-\nversity of Chicago Italian series.\nTHE little books of this series are\nedited by Mr Ernest Hatch Wil-\nkins. And it is, to judge from this\nvolume, a really delightful series.\nScholarly, not too bulky, pleasant good\npaper, solidly bound, copious notes,\nand Dr Furst's notes are clear, brief\nand entertaining: it is just what is\nwanted.\nFucini was born in 1843. 44 No\nwriter \" says Dr Furst, 44 excelled\nhim in simplicity and purity of style,\nin serenity of outlook, humour and\ngenuine feeling He wrote in the\nPisan dialect. 44 He taught belle let-\ntere (or, as he said, cartoline postali)\nat a boyfs school in Pistoia \". Then\nhe became an inspector of schools,\n14 an occupation for which his nature\nwas perfectly adapted \". He died in\n192L\nMatthew Arnold was older by\nr twenty years but they were contem-\ni poraries. I should like to read an\n5 imaginary conversation between these\nt two who were both poets and both\nE inspectors of schools.\n5 Dr Furst gives us three out of the\nr hundred sonnets of Fucini and ten of\n• the tales and a selection from Fucini's\n► impressions of Napoli. Ever since the\n: sonnets appeared in 1872 they must\n: have proved a source of inspiration to\n' hundreds of comedians; Musco, Fer-\nravilla, Petrolini, who have assuredly\n■ held the book in their hands as so\nmuch treasure; and it is only when\nsuch comedians read such verses aloud\nthat we, the poor public, ever get the\nfull value of them.\nFor there is something loud in\nthem : and the loud has more in it\nthan the timid suspect, for to the timid\nthere is mostly rudeness ia the loud.\nFor my part I want to hear more\nsonnets, verses, tales of genius spoken\naloud, but not by the poets : by the\nactors and to people who delight to\nlisten as the Italians do. I cannot\nabide to be listening with folk who\nare waiting for something pathetic,\nsententious, witty or biting. The loud\nis anyhow a guarantee that we are to\nbe spared these things : I feel safe with\nthe loud the moment it strikes up. It\nis after all only the old elephant of\nthe jungle : but the pathetic, the sen-\ntentious and the witty, as they start,\nremind me too immediately of the\ncrocodile, the lion and the tiger cat.\nI have never loved the lion to the\nextent that tradition does. He is\nsupposed to be so bold, so direct,\nwhereas he approaches his prey in a\ntortuous way. Ferravilla would be\nalways likening people to animals, I am\ntold. 44 Look —a horse \" he would say,\nor 44 a grey cat Many an actor has\nthis instinct and looks quickly for the\nanimal each man stands for.\n\nTHE CALL OF THE NIRVANA,\nDrama in Five Acts by Rudolf Broda,\nEnglish version with the collaboration\nof Selma B. Stone. The Four Seas\nCo. Boston.\nTHIS publishing house in its announce-\nments, prospectuses and wrappers\ntells the public that this series of books,\nie The Contemporary Series, are books\nof belles-lettres,—poetry, plays, essays,\nissued in an attractive format and\navailable at a popular price. But when\nI search to discern how popular is this\nprice nothing informs me.\nI am however rewarded, for I find\nsomething else, which is, that these\n• books include a playlet by Benavente,\ni one by Gordon Bottomley and one by\nf Von Hofmannsthal.\ni M The Call of the Nirvana \" is\nrather more than a bit dull: it is the\n! copyright of Ernst Bircher, Verlag\nAktiengesellchaft in Berne. It reads\nbadly. It might, who knows, act well\nand it might not. I can conceive no-\nthing more undramatic, but then I can\nconceive nothing less attractive than\nthe 44 heavy antique wove paper the\n44 coloured wrappers 99 and the 44 spe-\ncial designs\" which are all made a\ngreat point of in the announcements.\nIn 1923 the same firm issued 4< The\nArt of Cineplastics \" by Elie Faure\ntranslated from the French by Walter\nPach, Price I/—. (They announced\nprices in those days). A rare 1000\ncopies were issued — 44 1000 copies\nonly '* — and 25 on Stratford Paper\nwhatever that may be. M. Faure says\nin this booklet that Chaplin (re Charlie)\nmakes him think of Shakespeare.... he\nhas the same bewildering and yet lucid\nlyricism that Shakespeare had 41 Lucid\nLyricism *#! and there is something in\nMr Walter Pach that reminds me of\nShakespeare,—the silver sound, I think,\n44 and music with its silver sound \".\nBut the golden silence of Chaplin,\nhow that can be compared with Shakes-\npeare who is all words puzzles me.\nCompare Charlie with an actor and\nI'm with you, Elie. Compare him\nwith Ferravilla.... but where has Charlie\nsuddenly gone to ?\n\nAROUND THEATRES by Max\nBeerbohm. Heinemann.\nAvery remarkable book of Dra-\nmatic Criticisms appeared in Lon-\ndon in the year 1924 and no one\nnoted it. It was called 44 Around\nTheatres *\\ was in two volumes, and\nis by Mr. Max Beerbohm.—Well, I\nalmost wonder if I need go on.\nIs it necessary today to explain why\nany book by Mr Beerbohm must be\nthe best book of the year. Have we\nforgotten that there is an art of wri-\nting ?\nAs a rule we cannot write and I\nam almost convinced that the thing we\ncall thinking is not exactly thinking.\nBut Mr. Bernard Shaw, Sir A. W.\nPinero, Mr Rudyard Kipling, and a\ndozen more \" great writers\" and\n44 thinkers '* are, I believe, convinced\nthat they can both write and think:\nand, being so convinced, they set to\nwith a will, and, thinking it all out,\nthey then write it all down. As Iam\ndoing here."}, {"page_pdf": 103, "page_imprimee": "187", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.103", "texte": "But what troubles me is that I know\n1 am doing it badly. No such doubt\n'roubles them—as she said \" no bloom-\nng fear\nWhat I want to be saying in two\nwords, and take a hundred and miss\ndoing it, is that I think Beerbohm is\none of the best brains and one of the\nfew perfect writers we have had, and\nI cannot say it. To plump it out would\nbe of no good. Even a drama must\nhave a beginning, a middle and an\nend.\nAnd I am so impatient; I want the\naudience to come in with me to all\nour Theatres—to this one here—to sit\ndown—hold up their hands to a cur-\ntain on which are flashed the words\n\" All's understood \" and go out again\nand enjoy themselves there. As I am\ndoing here.\nBut Mr Shaw, Sir A. W. Pinero\nand the others don't want that at all.\nGood gracious no. They want nothing\nto be understood until they have for-\nced us all to come to heel —to enter\na parody of the real playhouse, to sit\nthere three hours and go out more\nconfused than before. Then and then\nonly may we go home and take twenty-\nfive years waiting for the light to\ndawn.... and slowly, slowly get the\nglimmering that we—just—have—wa-\nsted— twenty-five — years listening to\nmodern dramatists talking about prac-\ntically nothing at all.\nSome of us arrive at this by a sort\nof short cut to happiness and avoid\ngoing to listen to modern dramatists\ntalking. I am one of these. Some\ntwenty-six years ago I heard a play\nby Mr Pinero and three years later\none by Mr Shaw, and I never want\nto hear another. Some thirty years\n♦ago 1 read a page by Mr. Max Beer-\nfbohm and I never intend to miss ano-\nther.\nExplain why it is that these bore\nus and the other enchants. Or ra-\nther let me do so in two lines. It\nis because Mr Beerbohm is a born\nartist and Mr. Shaw and Sir A. W.\nPinero and many of the other admira-\nble gentlemen in the Dramatic field\nnever were and so never can be\nanything in any way whatever ap-\nproaching to the condition of artists.\nAnd so while Mr Shaw for three\nyears wrote a dramatic criticism each\nweek in the \" Saturday Review \", re-\ntiring from the post to give place to\nBeerbohm who for twelve years wrote\na dramatic criticism each week for the\nsame \" Saturday Review \", the Shaw\nessays count as nothing and the Beer-\nbohm essays are well-nigh perfect.\nShaw, who looks like Hercules,\ngives in after three years of it; Beer-\nbohm, who looks like anything but\nHercules, beats him by enduring nine\nyears longer than the giant was able\nto ....this is of course a point everyone\nwill have noted.\nI regret that these two new volumes\nare two out of a rare set of nine, for\nthose who should know of these Dra-\nmatic Criticisms will not come to know\nof them until Messrs Heinemann is-\nsue a popular edition ; and let us hope\nthis will appear during 1926. I do\nhope this with all my heart.\nI had intended to lift tempting pas-\nsages from these essays but I will not:\nyou must somehow get hold of a copy\nand read all the essays. There is one\non Henry Irving which you will read\nseveral times. I advise you to read it\nafter you have read Mr Shaw's article\non \" Mr Irving takes paregoric \" dated\nMay 4th 1895. In that article Mr\nShaw is constrained to state, of the\nStory of Waterloo, that \" there is\nabsolutely no acting in it—none what-\never \" ; he asserts, too, that a call-boy\ncould have performed a certain passage\nin that play. In fact Mr Shaw, besides\nbeing no artist, is woefully ignorant of\nacting ; yet he assumes, when he writes,\nall the assurance of one who knows\nall about it.\nMr Beerbohm, on the other hand,\nis a born actor, and, so far as I know,\nmakes no pretention at all to being\nthat. Every fine artist has a bit of\ngenius for acting. Giotto and Cellini,\nFragonard, Mozart, all of 'em had it ;\nand poor Shaw is totally without that\nbit of genius.... for the reason above\nstated.\nI delight to see, in this the stupid\nage, our G. B. S. raised up to be a\ncentral figure.\nIf it were not a stupid age, Beer-\nbohm would in all probability have\nwrit us our plays ;... they would have\nbeen powerful humorous things.... no-\nthing would have been amiss. Instead\nof this we have his Dramatic Criticisms\n—two books just as wise as they are\nunaffected, as useful to the stage as they\nare useful to the student of the En-\nglish language. The student of English\nhas profitted ; the theatre, as represented\nby those who elbow their way in\nand out of its stagedoor, has not\nprofitted.\nBut those of us who do care very\nmuch that the playhouse shall recover\nitself, as assuredly it shall, offer to\nMr. Beerbohm our admiration and our\nthanks for the lessons he gave us every\nSaturday for twelve years and which\nsome day we hope to show him we\nhave more or less understood.\n\nRING MASTERS.\nRICHARD WAGNER\n& JAMES .\nMy Circus Life by James Lloyd with\na preface by G. K. Chesterton,\nNoel Douglas. Price 5j*\nWagner's Music Drama of the Ring\nby L. Archier Leroy ; engravings by\nPaul Nash. (Noel Douglas) Price / 2 j-6*\nNOEL Douglas of 38 Great Ormond\nStreet, London is a new-comer in\nthe Publishers' Ring. He enters the magic\ncircle with a crack of the whip. And\nout trot some of the prettiest little po-\nnies ever I did see, in the shape of\nbooks as buxom as good work and\nmaterials and watchful eyes can make\nthem.\nWhen we see good craftsmanship in\nthe publishing or theatrical line or, for\nthat matter, in the way of restaurants,\nHotels, or Governments, our minds\noften turn to thinking of the unseen\nworkmen who can make or mar all\ncooperative work.\nIs it not some sort of toast to absent\nguests some of us offer silently to the\ngood workmen on seeing their work :\n— are the curses not loud but deep to\nthe bad workmen.\nAnd of course the good ones know\nof this—feel it in their bones—be they\nhidden by a big curtain or thick walls,\nby black ink or red tape. The bad\nworkmen never know what they get\nfrom us or what they misss That's\nwhat renders them surly and makes\nthem strike.\nAnd the good hidden workman, on\nhearing the rounds of applause, looks\nat the ring-master as he strides out to\nacknowledge with a bow the approval\nof the public for the work of himself\nand his men.\nOn the return of the ring-master\ndoes he go round to all and sundry\nand say \" It was you, old chap, who\nmade the show ;—the applause is yours,\nnot mine\nRing-masters may once in a blue\nmoon realize when some one member\nof a company has actually done the\nwork of forty—but he has to be very\nill first, ...laid up, unable to be on\nthe spot.\nThe ringmasters, for all the applause\nthey endure, are to be respected.\nWhen I first saw Barnum's Big Circus\nthere were three rings. In each a\nring-master. And here we have three\nof them too. Douglas, Wagner and\nLloyd.\nDouglas is dressy, Wagner classic,\nand Lloyd knows his business. Bar-"}, {"page_pdf": 104, "page_imprimee": "188", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.104", "texte": "num, the Deity of Showmen, presides\nover the whole business.\nThe cover of the Wagner book has\nmade itself up like the face of a clown\n—Grock couldn't have done it better ;\nthat of the Lloyd book is like the\ngreen satin trousers of Fratellini. And\nthe insides of both books bubble with\nfun. Even as all clowns get their laughs\nthrough being deadly in earnest, so do\nsome of the better kind of Ring-masters.\nAnd Wagner gets his that way.\nNot for Wagner is there any value\nin that vulgar saying about laughing\nlast. He never laughs, just as the classic\nold ring-master of 1870 never laughed.\nHe lets others do this and he lets others\ntalk and sing and run about. Wagner\n• has let Mr. Leroy his devoted admirer\ntalk, and for 196 pages Mr. Leroy\ntalks Wagner at us. He and Mr. Barbor\ncrack some jokes at his expense and the\nhorses trot round ; there's the circus.\nImmense as ever, Richard Wagner\ntowers in the centre.\nIt is a circus I never go to.\nOn the other hand nothing could\nkeep me out of Mr. James Lloyd's\ncircus.\nHis kind is the genuine article. The\njoke L. A. Leroy makes with H. R.\nBarbor about Wagner being a Man of\nthe theatre hits no one but the giant\nhimself. Lloyd is here to prove it a\njoke and a rather unkind one.\nOnly men like Lloyd are men of the\ntheatre. Festespiels by the hundred,\nBeechams by the score, Dalcroze's by\nthe million, will never be true theatre.\nA passage in Mr. Leroy's introduction\nstrikes me as curiously blind. He writes;\n\" When this (some trifle cr other) has\nbeen accomplished we may look for-\nward to a production of \" Tristan \",\nperhaps, which does not in any way\nremind us of an evening at Lord George\nSanger's estimable show \".\nHe fails to see, with most Wagne-\nrians, that what Wagner lacked was\nSanger's genius.... the genius of the\ngenuine Showman, and that his sole\nchance ofj being taken as a serious\ntheatre man lay in a forlorn hope that\nsome day he might remind us of Lord\nGeorge Sanger.\nI could understand a Wagner who\nbegan the way he did; who went :\nthrough it all and came out cured, and\nthen began his work. But to go on\nand in still further, to grow more and '\nmore Wagnerian when he should have 1\ngrown more and more Sangerian, that's <\nthe trouble.\nThese two books are made to live I\nside by side. Mr Lloyd's faults are t\nall the showman's—in a book he has -\n41 been and gone anJ done it\" as\nMr. Chesterton says in a charming\nIntroduction.\nAnd inasmuch as he has been a\nshowman and gone off afterwards and\ndone a book to say what exactly is\nthe whole life of a showman—a man\nof the theatre — by so much has he\nblazed light on the rare old smoke\nwhich Mr. Leroy and some three hun-\ndred other very clever men produce from\ntheir bonfires as they go round and\nround and round them throwing in this\nand that fillet, root and entrail, so as\nto make the charm work, and ultimately,\nwe hope, \" to share i* the gains *\\\n\" Up from the clown \" is the motto\nof the men of the theatre, not down\nfrom the Gods How long will it\ntake humanity (and one may add the\ncritic) to see this ?\nIs it not the cry \" up from the\nape \" that gives man at last a hope ?\nIf it is \" down from the Gods \" then\nall hope has gone. And if Wagner\nbe one of the Giants—if his spirit has\nreached so high as Bach, Beethoven and\nMozart, what the deuce are his gnomes\ndoing numbling round our cauldron ?\n\nJACOPONE DA TODI, POET\nAND MYSTIC. 1228*1306; by\nEvelyn Underbill. Dent Sons.\n16/— net.\nIF ever an intemperate man walked\nthis earth it was Jacopone da Todi\n—but there have been few whose in-\ntemperance took them off the earth as\ndid his. He soared with intempe-\nrance ; a lack of cardinal virtue laun-\nched him into Heaven. He loved so\nmuch that he loved all but himself.\nA writer in \" The Mask \" (J) recently\ntold us something of his story but I\nthink it very unlikely that its readers\nwill ever hear it retold correctly. Even\npagans nowadays are such scandal-\nmongers, such back-biters; and Jaco-\npone was that unforgivable thing, a true\nChristian. Mad, but Christlike in parts.\nIn some ways he resembles that\nfigure created by Walter Pater, Den-\nnys d*Auxerois. But Dennys was far\nmadder for he seems to have had two\nmasters—Jacopone had but one. Po-\nsitively he believed in love and not in\nFamour. (\nAnd this is one of the best books j\nwe have about him in our English (\nlanguage. It also contains thirty* four <\nof his songs in Italian and in English, j\nThe publishers announce only thirty- |\nthree but I counted twice and counted ,\nthirty-four. (\n_ s\nI regret that the talented authoress\nforgot to include J. A. Symonds' work\nin her \" Bibliography \" : and, while I\nam captious, let me indulge a regret\nthat so many publishers use quite such\nthick paper.\nI don't like rough blotting like pa-\nper to touch, and I don't think any\nlover of books likes it. Neither do 1\nlike the top edge of a fine book to be\npainted. If gilt, well and good; or if\nyeliowed, very carefully, it passes. But\nall depends on how these difficult jobs\nare done. Still the great firm of Dent\nis not alone in occasionally doing a\nlittle clumsy work. It is more or less\nthe fashion today. Not half enough\nconsideration is paid to those ancient\nproblems which beset even the devoted\n, lovers of good covers, paper, type, set-\nting and covers. *\nI have noticed that the Cambridge\nPress has a delicate taste in such mat-\nters. Chatto & Windus too. I often\nlike the books Jonathan Cape sends out.\nThe work of Mr Heinemann used to\nbe refined and some of it is so still.\nAll the good publishers try to pro-\nduce fine work of course ; but nowa-\ndays the right kind of brain and eye\nseems too often not to be employed by\nthese publishers.\nWe all know (or suppose) that good\ncardboard, cloth, paper and the like\nare hard to get and that all these\nthings are rather more expensive; but it&\nbrains I'm talking about, the special brain\nwhich understands what are* the quali-\nties needed in book work and how to\nhandle the book-binders and printers.\nThe Curwen Press has some real ta~\nlent, and so I take it that the Press\nhas men of brains and taste in control..\nLet printers experiment more with\nnewer papers, newer shapes, colours z\nand by new I mean those papers and\ncolours which are in front of their\nnoses and so near and so cheap that\nthey fail for this reason to be aware-\nof them.\nAnd why put on such heavy and\ncostly covers ? why such armour-clad\naffairs ? why not aim for delicacy and\ngood sense.\nThis is just what I feel Jacopone\nwould have said had he ever known\nof any but the most superb and yet\nthe cheapest binding, printing and\npaper. Experiment, for heaven's sake,,\ndear publishers. Put aside a small'\nsum of money a year to be used solely\nfor making experiments ; make them un-\nbeknown to us and on no account risk\nan experiment in public. Experiment is\nonly for the laboratory, and, if done\nseriously, would cost you only a few\nhundreds a year.\n(i) Vol. X. No. 2. April 1924. f"}, {"page_pdf": 105, "page_imprimee": "189", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.105", "texte": "THE GREATER LAW by Leo-\nnard C. White• Stage Play Publi-\nshing Bureau. London. //-: cloth\nbound, J?/-.\nI have read many a worse play, and\nsome merrier comedies,... for this is\ncalled \" a comedy in one act But\nI have some how never felt myself\nkept waiting quite as long for the point\nto be made ; and I fear I must call\nit a fault in this author to have kept\nthe audience in ignorance of where he\nwas going and what he was going to do.\nFor £ 1. 1. 0 amateurs may re-\npresent this piece, and I think they\nwill find their work none too easy.\nTo the lines in the stage direction\non page I Trevelyan crosses with the\ncups of tea I would here add and\nfalling over the sofa with them, en-\ntirely disappears. I feel it would be ef-\nfective, anyhow, and would risk it for\nthe sake of the audience who I believe\nwould never forget it.\n\nTHE ANGEL OF THE\nCHIMES by Fortune du Boisgoby.\nTHE CONVICT COLONEL: by\nFortune du Boisgoby.\nTHE NEAPOLITAN LOVERS by\nAlexandre Dumas. Stanley Paul &.\nCo. London. Translated by R. S.\nGarnett. Price 2/6 net each.\nFIRST the great old man.\nDumas was fifty-seven years old\nwhen he wrote this hook and there\nare some chapters as good as anything\nin \" Monte Cristo \" or t\\>e other mas-\nter pieces.\nHe was in Napoli, installed in the\nChiatamone Palace by Garibaldi, and\nthere he brought to life Ferdinando,\nKing of the two Sicilies and Jerusa-\nlem, Infante of Spain, Duke of Parma,\nof Piacenza, of Castro, and hereditary\nGrand Prince of Tuscany, that prepo-\nsterous but sensible Italian whom the\nlazzaroni of Napoli called \" II Re Na-\nsone \" King big Nose #\\\nThe genius with which Dumas brings\nhim to life is one of the things we\nshall never cease to marvel at : — how\ndoes he do it ? how can this being be\nmade to move, to walk right out into\nour room, and exist for us as he exi-\nsted in realty. For he is real and not\nmade up. He is preposterous ; yet he\nis likable, and admirable. He has most\nof the faults of a poor king and the\nqualities of a perfect one — He is, in\nfact, a king.\nMost novelists give us less than a\npoor actor does when playing the part.\nAll else in the book, good as it is,\nfades by the side this brilliant creation.\nThere slops Emma Hamilton, and\nthere stalks Nelson : Lord Acton looks\npoisonous and Queen Caroline daggers.\nThese are not fortunate enough to be\nmore than sketches ; yet put any one of\nthem into either of the two works by\ndu Boisgoby and our attention would\nbe rivetted on these figures and we\nshould take them to be alive. It is\nbecause Ferdinand is a round little\nmasterpiece that the others become flat.\nDu Boisgoby does not create any\nfigure at all worth while in his my-\nstery tales, but he is readable. Not\nso readable as Bennett with his \" Grand\nBabylon Hotel \", or Chesterton with\nhis \" Man who was Thursday \". What\nfirst class entertainers are these two\nthrillers! As good as either, to my\nthinking, is A. E. W. Mason's \" The\nHouse of the Arrow Mason doesn't\ndisappoint; \" The Winding Stair \"....\n\"The Villa Rose \"....Yes. I like Mason.\nBut I am forgetting that it is du\nBoisgoby I am supposed to say I like;\nand, if you don't give me Mason, Ches-\nterton, or. the author of \" The Cap-\ntive of Love du Boisgoby will do.\n\nTHE SISTERS' TRAGEDY\nand Three other Plays hy Richard\nHugh es. Heinemann Ltd. 6/- net,\n£- '\nALTHOUGH there are many lite-\nrary men, critics and theatrical\npeople who still hold that plays should\nnot be published, but should be kept\nstrictly from the public except through\nthe medium of the stage, I must say\nthat for my part I am grateful to re-\nceive these things and thus be enabled\nto enjoy them in my walks and my\ntrain and my automobile.\nAnd I should imagine that these\nparticular four plays by Mr. Hughes\nwould be of considerable value to any\ntheatre the repertory system had not\nutterly baffled. As it is, the repertory\nsystem acts as a spook to us or seems to\nbe too stupid a thing and too ordinary\nfor any English theatre manager to\ncomprehend.\nWell, it is of no use wasting more\ntime in talking about that: it's all been\ntalked in and out of existence;—let it\ngo then, and let us read these excel-\nlent plays without further regrets.\nThe newer school of English play-\nwrights, to which Mr. Hughes belongs,\nis on the right road. It is concerned\nwith plays which are plays, not plays\nwhich are Sermons or Debates or\nDrugs or Propaganda. Questions seem\nno longer to teaze the younger drama-\ntists. What a blessing. We really\nare getting on at last. Woman takes\nher place in these new dramas instead\nof being put up in a pillory for the\nDramatist to throw oranges at her or\nto flatter her \" good-fellow \"-ship.\nYes, indeed we are getting on. Or\nrather, Mr. Hughes and the others are\ngetting us on, so good luck to them\none and all.\n\nAN ITALIAN DICTIONARY\nby Alfred Hoare. Second Edition.\nCambridge University Press. 42f net.\nC.1 ■\" * tUTux l*n 1 VfiMIU IHIIIWIIII ■ 111 I\nTHIS admirable Dictionary, the most\ncomplete and helpful we have\never used, should be in every public\nand university and school library, and\nclose to the hand of every student\nwhose work brings him into any rela-\ntion whatever with Italian matters and\nItalian literature.\nMr Hoare has based his work on\nthe best authorities; he has arranged it\non a lucid and most helpful plan: in\nits comprehensiveness, its completeness,\nits wealth of illustrative quotations and\nof special phrases and proverbs,- and\nits inclusion of both old technical words\nand modern terms and phrases which\nwe have found in no other Italian-\nEnglish Vocabulary, we consider it far\nsuperior to any other existing in En-\nglish. The Cambridge University Press\nhas issued it in a convenient volume,\nadmirably arranged, and printed in fine\nclear type, and, together with Mr Hoare,\nrendered a valuable service to every\nEnglish student of the Italian language\nby the publication of this work.\n\nTHE BULLETINS The Smith-\nsonian Institute.\n■■ ■■■—■■■■\"\" ■ I m i ■mi. — I i\nONLY two words are needed to\ntell of the valuable Bulletins is-\nsued by the Smithsonian Institute, Wash-*\nington, and everyone who knows but\none of them will want to see the\nothers.\nThese Bulletins, together with the\nGeographical Magazine, form the most\nserious and the most brilliant publica-\ntion which America issues,\nThey contain little of Theatric in-\nterest and you have to search carefully *\nto find even that little: but the search\nis worth while.\n\nMAGAZINES.\n\nTHE \" Theatre Arts Monthly\ncontinues to do as well as ever;\nindeed better, since it is giving us\nmore information of American theatres"}, {"page_pdf": 106, "page_imprimee": "190", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.106", "texte": "of the last century, and abstaining from\ntoo much speculation about the new\nmovement in Europe.\nBut for all this Mr Macgowan has\na fling at that movement in a recent\nnumber and the fling fails.\nHe supposes that this New Move~\nment was started and planned for a\nshort run. He lives in a land where\n(so I hear) a house of ten stories is\noften built to last but a year and to\nbe swept away and another built on\nits site, and this, second, house in its\nturn is broken up for a third to be\nraised, and all this in the space of\neight or nine years.\nMuch as we must all adore Ame-\nrica we never cared a straw for that\nsort of thing. And so Mr Macgowan\nis wrong to suppose that anyone in\nthe year 1925 can sum up the results\nin America of the seed sown in 1900,\nThe results will be seen, I should\nguess, about the year 1960 or 2000.\nThe amiable writer manifests his\nway of seeing things wrong by clai-\nming that the old Park Theatre,\nNew York, of 1805 44 might have\ndelighted Palladio, Inigo Jones and\nCopeau in equal measure Whether\nit delights Copeau remains to be dis-\ncovered; but no one who knows any-\nthing of the work of Palladio and\nJones can have a moment's hope that\nit would have given these men anything\nbut excrutiating delight of a ribald kind.\nAppia and Craig it seems, according\nto Macgowan, are not doing as they\nfondly suppose they are, but they have\nbeen for years 44 fighting the battle of\nrealism against artificiality \".\nIf we did not hold that Mr Mac-\ngowan had done some good service to\nthe New Movement we should put\nhim down as a bit of an ignoramus\nand a very sleepy fellow. The fact\nis, America hustles him along witlFsome\nmillions more of its good boys and true,\nand he is not allowed the time to stop\nand think twice or three times over a\nmatter—or, say, seven or eight times.\nIn Europe it is still customary to give\nmost of the time to thinking so as to\nsee and to understand, and a few hours\nto the writing down the conclusions.\nIn America three minutes are al-\nlowed for thought and one glimpse is\npermitted, and then copy has to be\nready by six o'clock the same evening.\nAlways bear this in mind when rea-\nding the 44 Theatre Arts Monthly \"\nand you'll never bear a single one of\nthe boys any ill will:—but, if you fail\nto remember it, its ten to one you'll grow\nwaxy as did St John Ervine, or, worse\nstill, contemptuous like some of his\nbetters.\ni 44 Ah ! but the potentialities of Ame-\n' rica—think of the potentialities \" says\nthe American.\n; Potentiality is possession of dominant\npower, possibility of action, and Ame-\nrica is not holding back anything; nothing\n' is allowed to lie dormant : all is exploi-\nted the moment it has been netted : to\n■ net it, to bag it, the young fellows come\nover to Europe, and, as 44 The Lite-\nrary Digest \" puts it, 44 ransack Eu-\nrope on a Harvard travelling scho-\nlarship \". Exactly. Ransack Europe—\nand take back nothing in a bag.\nNo, dear and much admired Ameri-\ncans, not so will you ever come to own\nthe right to boast proudly that your land\nhas Potentialities. Your own Whitman\nhad potentialities when he was thirty\nand he had done it by himself and by\nwaiting. He absorbed all he could\nAsiatic and European—but he absor-\nbed more that was in the trees and lakes\nof his own land. Then he wrote a poem,\nhis 44 Song of Myself \", and became\nWhitman, not Tennyson-and-water.\nWE stick to it.... 44 The Review\nof Reviews \" is one of the very\nfew illuminating journals issued. Its\nAmerican version and the other ver-\nsions of the same notion are the others\nthat make up the few things to which\nwe refer. For here at a glance live\nfolly of the majority is revealed, and\nas a rule the minority is made to look\nas foolish.\nIt is only in the 44 Review of Re-\nviews \" that we can see that while\none half of England howls down\nMr. Churchill, the other half howls\ndown the last three or four Chancellors\nof the Exchequer, whoever they may\nbe; while the Premier is exe-\ncrated seemingly by 44 everyone \" today,\nevery other one execrated the late\nPremier yesterday. So everyone is\nbeing howled down.\nSides cease to exist in the 44 Review\nof Reviews \" for all are laid flat. It's\nlike Punch and Judy. Punch alone\nrules supreme. Be the governors po-\nwerful or vacillating, cruel or kind,\nall's one—they are all wrong.\nThe majority must chatter, must\nhave its way, must pull down, break,\nspoil and cry for the moon.\nThis the 45 Review of Reviews \" re-\nveals as no other journal ever has re-\nvealed, for it extracts all the howls, and\nof course all the praise where it can\nbe found, from all the journals and\nthese it reprints. Every man is exa ted\n—Rulers alone, whoever they be, are\ndegraded—not by the Review of Re-\nviews, for that Review has a ruler too,\nbut by the Laws of Democracy.\n\nEDITORIAL NOTES.\n\nOUTBURST IN\nBBOAA—BOMB—K—a ■ ■■■ rk RNINRMWI I w~m r IIW m 1111——«C»BI\nWHEN Mr. St. John Ervine, in\nhis famous speech delivered at\nthe Authors' Club on October 22nd\n1923, declared that we in England\nwere passing through a period of tran-\nsition from masculine feminine, and\ndeteriorating too, he was obviously\nrude but probably right: when he ad-\nded that owing to feminine predomi-\nnance tragedy vanished and its place\nwas taken by comedy, he was growing\nrather more polite and a little vague :\nbut, by the time he had wound up by\nsaying that if the writers wanted to\nget the world back on to decent lines\nthey had to start off with the gloomiest\npossible view of it, he had descended\nto the honied small talk of the draw-\ningrooms and was utterly wrong.\nWriters do not get the world back ;\n—if writers do anything with the world\nthey fan it or poke it as it goes for-\nwards on its own career. It is much\nto be one of the world's lacqueys,\noutrunners, or pages, and the artists,\nwriters and acrobats are all just about\nthat.\nMr. Ervine is rather like that lady\nof the other day who, at the end of\nthe second act of \" Fallen Angels \"\nstood up in a box at the Globe Thea-\ntre, London and said that, as a mem-\nber of the British public she protes-\nted.. ; at which the other nine hun-\ndred and ninety-nine members of that\nBritish public broke in more rudely\nand said 4# sit down \".\nIt was not a man, you note, who\nrose up and protested against the co-\nmedy as Mr. Ervine would have us\nsuppose : on the contrary, a man did\nrise up later from a stall afcd remark\nthat he had come to the theatre to be\namused and that he 'did not relish\nhaving his amusement interrupted in\nthe ladylike Ervine way. But the lady\nhaving blundered, (just like Ervine)\nblundered on and said she wasn't going\naway and that what she thought of\nNoel Coward was..., at which her voice\nwas drowned by the nine hundred and\nninety nine British Publicans male and\nfemale, and no one noticed if she did"}, {"page_pdf": 107, "page_imprimee": "191", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.107", "texte": "or didn't 44 go away \". She would\nhave been a fool not to.\nWe haven't seen 44 Fallen Angels \",\nand we have not read it though aw-\nfully keen to read it now. Nor have\nwe heard what it's about; or whether\ngood, bad or indifferent : but we have\nseen and heard too many ladies in\nLondon protesting. Some protest quietly,\nbut we prefer the Ervine kind. Of\ncourse it's a bit vain to up and tell\na whopper openly, but it shows a bit\nof Ervinism. Honest honest Ervine, he\nreally is a very proper sort of a duf.\nfer: whereas the other kind of lady\nwho protests quietly, damning things\nin the meanest way, is the lady we\nlike least. She'll not say out that its\na damnable play, be it by Coward,\nMaugham or Ervine. She'll say the\nauthor smells; or 'tis a pity he's so\ndirty; or that he has no windows in\nhis house. We know of two celebra-\nted ladies (one is now dead,... had a\npublic funeral too : the other may have\none) who both attempted to damn\ntwo artists (one of them our best\nplaywright) in the way we state. This\nis why we rather admire old Ervine\nand the protesting lady of the Globe\ntheatre.\nBut all of them, all these theatre going\ncritics, have the wrong notion in their\nhead. They go to see a play in the\nwrong way. The only way to go is\nfor an evening's amusement or refresh-\nment ; and the sole way to do this is\nto go there passively, leaving any sense\nof one's own importance and all one's\nown fixed ideas at the box-office with\none's 10/6.\nProtesters are not the public and\nare generally dead-heads; they get tic-\nkets somehow for nothing. 44 The pu-\nblic \" is no one but he who pays; and\nhe who pays, unless he is a fool, is\nnever going to a theatre to protest. We\nalways pay for our tickets, and when\nwe don't enjoy the comedy, well, the\ndisappointment sharpens us up. Besides,\nthere is generally something good in\nevery evening's entertainment, and it\nis folly to annoy oneself or one's fel-\nlow theatre-goer during the evening.\nThe dramas written today are good\nor bad in as much as the conditions\ngoverning us are good or bad.\nAt least so it seems to us; and, in\na letter received on this very point\nfrom M. Francois M. Florian. (dated\n44 September 1st, at the hour of 11. 45\nbetween Vilvoorden and Bruxelies\")\nhe would seem to agree with us. He\nsays; 44 if you don't like the kind of\nplays a country produces you must\nchange the conditions prevailing in the\nland if you want better \"; and he\ncontinues: 44 That is * how it seems to\n44 me as I wander from city to city.\n44 Half my life is spent in a second-\n44 class compartment of a French, Ita-\n44 lian or German train, and I must\n44 say I prefer your English trains and\n44 their third class carriages. But Iam\n44 never going to grumble at the others....\n441 pay my 153 lire or my 73 francs\n44 and thank the directors with a full\n44 heart whenever I hear that old cry\n44 44 Premier Service \". The Train\n44 game and the Theatre game are\n44 alike in this, that one must ' play\n44 the game ' as you say in both ca-\n44 ses. Ervine and that lady and the\n44 other ladies you wrote me of are\n44 playing some other game—la crosee\n44 may be \".\n\nBRITISH OPERA.\nIN our last issue we voiced the sen-\ntiment of many millions of Briti-\nshers ; ie, that British Opera should be\nBritish and be damned to the foreign\nstuff, till it was more British.\nProfessor Nicoll voices a fine mino-\nrity of folk who believe Art to be In-\nternational (0.\nWhat we said was not that the Bri-\ntish National Opera Company does not\nperform one British Opera, but does\nperform too many foreign Operas.\nIf it performed Purcell and Macken-\nzie and Sullivan and Delius and a do-\nzen others—Dent, Shaw, Bantock—all\nof them, we should not have blamed\nit for taking such a name as the Bri-\ntish National Opera Company.\nProfessor Nicoll avoids the point.\nWho objects to Rossini, Bizet, Wag-\nner, Debussy and the others. Their\nworks are adorable—but they must not\nflourish, and be flourished by us, till\nthe operas of Britishers are also being\nproduced. All of us would then wel-\ncome the foreign work. Why must we\nin England have Wagner plus Reinhardt\nforced on us and not be allowed to\nhave Purcell plus Craig as a pre-\nlude ?\nMr. Smith has touched on this ten-\ndency in his Reply in these columns\nthis quarter (2). We wish England would\nrouse up and do more than merely\ntouch on it :—we wish that the Press\nwould bring it home once and for all\nto the English people that they are\nbeing cheated of our best artists, both\nthe dead masters and their living fol-\nlowers,\n(1) See page 163-4.\n(2) See page 164-6.\n\nMISREPRESENTATION\n*' Vous I'avez voulu, vous Tavez voulu,\nGeorges Dandin \".\nWELL now, who'd have thought it.\nIt appears that Gordon Craig's\nschool has 44 sought to make the actor\n44 more remote, masking him, robbing\n44 him of personality, so that he should\n44 seem isolated, a creature a different\n44 birth At least that is what 44 The\nLabour Monthly recently asserted.\nThat interesting publication knows a\ngood deal.... same as hundreds of 44 La-\nbour \" folk, — whatever 44 Labour \" is.\nWe too have laboured, and yet we\ncannot bring ourselves to feel isolated,\nand 44 Labour \" is only an awfully iso-\nlated thing if it stands itself aloof from\nall other things. To be so stern about\nit, to feel that a special name—ie La-\nhour—is needed to denote what we\nalways supposed was a little universe!\nand everyday act, strikes us now and\nagain as rather far fetched.\nTo be remote, to rob the actor of\ntrue personality, is the last notion to\nappeal to the Gordon Craig School,\nof that we are quite sure. So M. E.\nof the Labour Monthly must give us\nanother chance if he feels like it,\nand give another guess. This one was\nwrong. In the age when men were\nnearest to the ideals of Socialism, ac-\ntors were masked. Not to make them\naloof—remote—isolated, but solely for\na technical reason. It makes for mud-\ndled thought to feel as M. E. feels.\nBut then a good Conservative in\nEngland would also object to a mask-\ned actor; or to a really good actor\nwere he masked or not. A Liberal\nwould agree with the Conservative and\nthe Socialist here. In fact very few\nmen if they get tied up to a political\nparty can cut away from it all at the\nsensible moment and revel in Theatri-\ncals, and so they miss very much.\nAll thought of party in a playhouse\nbrings there a host of suspicions.\n44 He is doing this for a reason \"\nmurmurs the Citizen Smith: Sir M,\nE. Smith is equally sure of that too—\nbut for the opposite reason Wil-\nliam Mc. Black-Smith, the judge,\nis positive of it and the other Smiths\ndisagree with all these and hold to\ntheir opinion which is that there's a\nmotive behind that Mask—a fell pur-\npose hidden behind this backcloth, and\nthose pink lights mean a certain loss\nof votes at the next election. All of\nwhich is fiddle-faddle. Artists are not\nclever like that—they can do a bit in\ntheir own line but that's not the line.\nThey hold very few views and sel-"}, {"page_pdf": 108, "page_imprimee": "192", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.108", "texte": "dom an opinion—except on technical\nmatters, and they strive to enjoy them-\nselves in their work and give pleasure,\nAnd this they often succeed in doing.\nWhy should our good friend M. E.\ngo for the Gordon Craig School when\nthe Gordon Craig School only has\none aim, to do some good work—do\nit well —and to give some pleasure ?\nIt s a pity. But then hundreds of\nfolk in England are for ever going for\nthings about which they are mistaken,\nThey have that smallest of passions—\nthe passion for trying to bring us all\nup—to form us after their own like-\nness. Fearful loss of time—absurd path\nto wander in and get lost.\nAnd so we have no Theatre in\nEngland. Everyone wants it to be as\nhe wants. Ask him what it is he\nwants and he can't give a sound ans-\nwer. Yet he wont have Craig—he\nwon't have Barker; he won't have\nanything except what he wants.\nAnd so that's all he gels. Isn't it\ntime for them to sit quiet for a bit—and\nlet the artists give the Public their best ?\nThe artist can do that but he can't do\nmore : and while everyone of the public\nis giving an opinion in the different Dai-\nlies, Weeklies and Monthlies, the artist\ncannot even begin to give you his best.\nAfter all, what he knows he can\ngive you must be rather better than\nanything you can think of for yourselves;\nbut there of course you don't agree,\nAnd your opinion is of more value to\nyou than his art :—well then have and\nhold to your opinion. But don't ask for\nthings to be better—for now they are\nprecisely as you wanted them, George\nDandin.\n\nA SYMPOSIUM REPLY.\nJ. S.\n\nHaving just received this reply from Mr\nMax Beerbohm we print it on this last page\nof the volume rather than hold it over for\nthe January number.\n1. They were joined together, forming a\nsquare.\nExactly why this was done is and will\nalways be debateable.\n2. Prof. Guilliatri maintains that it was\n\" La Nobil Donna Macbetti \" (on which\nShakespeare founded his well-known tragedy).\n3. Three scenes ? Three ? three hundred\nwas the average on ordinary evenings. On\nfestas they totted up to 3,000,000 and more.\n4. It is both. San Gallo was an unblush-\ning plagiarist. Reinhardt, as compared with\nhim, is original and crimson-cheeked.\n1B. The ospitiiwere the hospiti, the guests;\nin modern parlance the free list, or \" paper\n2B. Teatro comes from the Latin theatrum\nwhich comes from the Greek ©eaxpov which\ncomes from ©£0|iat? which means I see.\n3B. Foro & foyer. It was much used by\nthe audience during the intratti (entr'actes)\nand also during the atti (actes).\n\nDiagram I.\n\nDiagram 2.\n\nA DEBT TO DOSTOEVSKI.\nJ. S.\nMR. Hugh Walpole, writing to \"The\nTimes \", informs us that owing\nto the Russian Revolution, the sole\nsurviving member of the Dostoevski\nfamily, Miss Aim6e Dostoevski, is left\nwithout resources and that she is ill in\nSwitzerland. Russia did not enter the\nCopyright Convention till Dostoevski's\nworks had been translated into al-\nmost every European language, so the\ngreat writer's family never received a\npenny from these European and Ame-\nrican translations —and we know how\nfew pennies he received for his works in\nhis own Russia and how he was dri-\nven to his writing.\nAnyhow some two years ago a fund\nwas started in Switzerland by friends\nand admirers of Miss Dostoevski, but\nthe fund was exhausted last August.\nMr. Walpole informs us that 44 the\nsmallest sums contributed to this fund,\naddressed Dostoevski Fund, C/o Comp-\ntoir d'Escompte de Geneve, Rue du\nSimplon, Vevey, will be thankfully re-\nceived and acknowledged\". We have\nsent a small sum and we hope that\none or two of our readers who have\nby chance not seen 44 The Times\"\nletters will send along too; — for,\nif they can believe it, these i requests\nare sometimes not responded to as\nquickly as one would suppose.\nSomething comes in between the\nimpulse and the deed and nothing is\ndone.\nSo in remembrance of the great\nwriter\n\nAll Rights reserved. October 1925.\nGerente responsabile Antonio Maraini.\nTipografia Giuntina, Firenze."}, {"page_pdf": 109, "page_imprimee": "193", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.109", "texte": "BHEBODBHMHHKaSI\n§®j\n♦\nLtd ❖\nANNOUNCE\nA NEW BOOK by GORDON CRAIG\nBOOKS & THEATRES\nWith about thirty Illustrations\n#\nThis delightful volume contains a collection of Essays about books in general and the\ntheatre in particular, told with the freshness and charm which characterised the author's\nWoodcuts and Some Words. The volume is illustrated with a remarkable series of\nphotographs of old Italian Theatres, etc.\nPROSPECTUS POST FREE\nRoyal 8vo. lis. Sd. net.\nBy the same Author\nWOODCUTS & SOME WORDS. Sq. Royal 4to. Limited Edition £, 3.3.0 net,\nSmall Fcap 4to, 10s. 6d. net.\nTOWARDS A NEW THEATRE. Sq. Royal 4to, 26s. net.\nPIRANDELLO'S PLAYS IN ENGLISH\nSix Characters in Search of an Author, Henry IV, Right You Are. In One Volume 6s. net.\nAlso: Each in His Own Way : The Pleasure of Honesty: Naked. The Three Plays\nin one Volume, io.y. 6d. net.\nq WRITE FOR AUTUMN LIST\nALDINE HOUSE. 66 CHANDOS STREET. LONDON W. C. 2.\n\na\nJUST PUBLISHED.\nCUCHULAIN N\nAN EPIC DRAMA OF THE GAEL.\nBy TERENCE GRAY, Author of\n\" Hatshepsut \" etc.\nDemy cloth. Many illustrations. 12)6 net. Postage yd.\nThe author has woven into one vast circle the\nwonderful stories of ancient Ireland. His illustrations\nshow some novel stage-settings\nBy the same Author.\nDANCE DRAMA. Experiments in\nthe Art of the Theatre. Illustrated\nin line and colour.\nDemy 8vo. sewed, 5.?. net. (Postage 6d.)\nAn enthusiastic plea for the future of the Drama.\nSTAGE-LIGHTING FOR\n\" LITTLE \" THEATRES.\nby C. HAROLD RIDGE\nwith a Foreword by BASIL DEAN and an Intro-\nduction by TERENCE GRAY.\nDemy 8vo, cloth. Illustrated, net. (Postage id.)\nHow to achieve good effects at small cost and\ntrouble: with full diagrams.\nW. HE FEE R& SONS LTD.\nCAMBRIDGE. ENGLAND.\n\nAN ITALIAN\nDICTIONARY\nBy A. HOARE, M. A.\nSecond, Edition. Demy 4to. 42s. net.\nThe work is recognized as the\nstandard Italian dictionary in this\ncountry.... The clear arrangement\nof the matter and the admirable\nprinting make the book a pleasure\nto consult \". — The Scotsman.\nO\nCAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS\nFETTER LANE. LONDON, E. C. 4."}, {"page_pdf": 110, "page_imprimee": "194", "url_page": "https://bluemountain.princeton.edu/bluemtn/?a=d&d=bmtnaau192510-01.1.110", "texte": "GARDEN CITIES\nAND\nTOWN PLANNING\nIS THE ORGAN OF THE GARDEN\nCITIES & TOWN PLANNING ASSO-\nCIATION AND THE INTERNATIONAL\nFEDERATION FOR TOWN AND\nCOUNTRY PLANNING AND GARDEN\nCITIES. IT CONTAINS INFORMA-\nTION ABOUT HOUSING AND TOWN\nPLANNING QUESTIONS OF ALL\nOVER THE WORLD, AND IS ILLUS-\nTRATED WITH PPIOTOGRAPHS AND\nPLANS.\no\nTHE SUBSCRIPTION IS 73h\nPER ANNUM, POST FREE.\nO\nPUBLISHED A T,\n3, GRA Y'S INN PLA CE,\nLONDON, IV. C, 1.\n\nCANTAGALLI\nARTISTIC MAJOLICAS\nARCHITECTURAL\nDECORATIONS\nREPRODUCTIONS OF\nWORKS OF\nDELLA ROBBIA\nO\nMANUFACTURY\nFLORENCE\n(PORTA ROMANA)\no\nBRANCH EST A BLISHMEN T\nROME\nVIA BABUINO 182.\n\nNOTES\nAND\nUER I E S\nA MEDIUM OF INTER-'\nCOMMUNICATION FOR\nLITERARY MEN, GENE-\nRAL READERS, ETC.\nF0UN D E D 1849.\na\nWEEKLY.\nPRICE 6d. POST FREE 7<J.\nANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION\n£ 1-15-4 post free.\n(Including' two Indexes).\nu\nTHE MASK\n(Volume 9, 1925) says :\nu Notes dk Queries \" is published\nby the Bucks. Free Press, 20\nHigh Wycombe. Bucks. England,\nfrom whom you will order it ifyou\nwant to enjoy one of the few\nunspoiled magazines of the day.\n\n| PLACE A j\n| DEFINITE |\n| ORDER TO-DAY |\n| AR C HIT ECT U R E j\n1 A MAGAZINE OF g\nI Monthly ARCHITECTURE Subscnption Terms |\n1 !/\" AND THE ALLIED l4/\" 1\nI Post free 1/3 ARTS & CRAFTS per annum 1\n| OVER 50 PAGES J\n1 of Matter §\n1 and Illustrations s C 1\n1 PUBLISHERS, THE BUILDER, LTD.\n| CATHERINE ST. AND YORK ST., W.C.2. g"}]}